联想ThinkPad T14 G3评测--商务笔记本用英特尔和Nvidia更糟糕
我们已经测试了ThinkPad T14 G3版本配备了AMD Ryzen 7 Pro包括快速的Radeon 680M iGPU进行了广泛的测试,但联想也继续提供配备英特尔处理器和可选NvidiaGeForce GPU的14英寸商务笔记本电脑。通过21AJS00400型号,我们现在有这样一个代表,结合了 Alder Lake酷睿i7-1260P与 GeForce MX550在我们的测试台上。我们可以忽略Raptor Lake处理器还没有在这里使用的事实,因为性能的提高只会是很小的,因为我们已经能够看到 我们已经能够看到.
基本上,AMD和英特尔型号共享相同的外壳和输入设备、网络摄像头和扬声器。因此,在下面的测试中,我们将主要集中在哪个版本更好,以及额外的显卡是否真的还值得的问题上。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
86.4 % | 03/2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 i7-1260P, GeForce MX550 | 1.5 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
88.8 % | 09/2022 | Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE R7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M | 1.4 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
88.7 % | 12/2022 | HP EliteBook 840 G9 i7-1280P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.5 kg | 19 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
88.8 % | 10/2022 | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 1.3 kg | 16.6 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
90.3 % | 09/2022 | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 15.6 mm | 14.20" | 3120x2080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
与ThinkPad T14 G3 AMD的区别
除了掌托上的贴纸不同外,两个ThinkPad T14版本在外观上没有任何区别,所以我们请你参考我们的 对AMD型号的广泛测试关于这一点的广泛测试。基本连接也是一样的,但联想在AMD型号中放弃了USB 4.0,而英特尔版本则有两个USB-C连接,支持雷电4。
通过AX211无线局域网卡,英特尔型号还支持现代的6-GHz网络,但我们在测试中无法使用参考网络路由器连接到相应的网络。然而,在常规5G网络中的表现也非常好。我们的测试装置已经做好了WWAN准备,后面的Nano-SIM卡插槽以及LTE模块所需的天线都已经到位。
Networking | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
维护
在内部布局上也有区别。虽然联想提供的是 AMD型号只提供焊接的内存,不向用户提供任何扩展功能,而英特尔机型的情况则不同。除了焊接的模块(在我们的案例中是16GB),还有一个免费的SO-DIMM插槽,使RAM的总量可能达到48GB。
显示 - 面板抽奖继续
正如在以前的ThinkPad型号中已经出现的那样,联想也为当前的型号使用了不同的面板制造商。尽管我们的两台测试机都配备了14英寸低功耗全高清面板,但即使保留了两个版本(甚至更多,因为过去有多达4个版本)的基本技术规格,这里还是存在差异。与与我们以前的AMD测试装置的LG面板相比我们目前的英特尔测试设备使用的是友达的面板,主观上并不完全令人信服,因为明亮的区域看起来略有颗粒感。这里的响应时间也明显较慢,而且有一些明显的重影效果,例如在移动鼠标指针时。然而,这里也没有使用PWM。
亮度也是如此,它比LG型号的亮度低。然而,它仍然达到了宣传的400cd/m²。由于黑值较低,对比度没有理由抱怨。我们的测试设备没有任何混浊或屏幕出血的问题,即使在最高亮度水平也没有。
|
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 399 cd/m²
Contrast: 2105:1 (Black: 0.19 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.6
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
77.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
76.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.11
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 B140UAN02.1, IPS, 1920x1200, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE LP140WU1-SPB2, IPS, 1920x1200, 14.00 | HP EliteBook 840 G9 Chi Mei CMN1435, IPS, 1920x1200, 14.00 | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti MNE007ZA1-1, IPS, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 TMX1422, IPS, 3120x2080, 14.20 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -7% | -8% | -3% | 12% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 76.3 | 69.2 -9% | 67.6 -11% | 74.1 -3% | 94.6 24% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 97.4 -3% | 98.7 -1% | 97.4 -3% | 99.5 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 77.9 | 71.5 -8% | 69.7 -11% | 75.3 -3% | 86.5 11% |
Response Times | 40% | -19% | 54% | 55% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 62.6 ? | 41.4 ? 34% | 66 ? -5% | 31.5 ? 50% | 25.4 ? 59% |
Response Time Black / White * | 34.9 ? | 19.2 ? 45% | 46.4 ? -33% | 14.5 ? 58% | 17.1 ? 51% |
PWM Frequency | |||||
Screen | 16% | 14% | -6% | 22% | |
Brightness middle | 400 | 451 13% | 391.3 -2% | 421 5% | 603 51% |
Brightness | 395 | 435 10% | 368 -7% | 416 5% | 586 48% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 94 3% | 86 -5% | 89 -2% | 91 0% |
Black Level * | 0.19 | 0.21 -11% | 0.32 -68% | 0.28 -47% | 0.39 -105% |
Contrast | 2105 | 2148 2% | 1223 -42% | 1504 -29% | 1546 -27% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.5 | 2.4 31% | 1.49 57% | 3.2 9% | 1.1 69% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.2 | 4.1 43% | 3.29 54% | 5.5 24% | 2.2 69% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.6 | 1.3 19% | 0.44 72% | 2 -25% | 1.2 25% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.8 | 3.3 31% | 1.7 65% | 4.4 8% | 1.5 69% |
Gamma | 2.11 104% | 2.13 103% | 2.12 104% | 2.22 99% | 2.17 101% |
CCT | 6662 98% | 6848 95% | 6488 100% | 6384 102% | 6549 99% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 16% /
14% | -4% /
5% | 15% /
3% | 30% /
25% |
* ... smaller is better
我们用专业的CalMAN软件(X-Rite i1 Pro 2)测量了该面板。尽管在交付状态下有轻微的绿色/蓝色色调,但这在日常操作中并不十分明显,对于一台商务笔记本电脑来说,结果已经很不错了。通过我们自己的校准(可从上面的链接免费下载颜色配置文件),我们能够进一步改善颜色的再现。结合完整的sRGB色彩空间覆盖,该面板相当适用于偶尔的图像或视频处理任务。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
34.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.5 ms rise | |
↘ 18.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
62.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 28.2 ms rise | |
↘ 34.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
该面板在户外表现尚可,但你仍应避免直接光源的反射。IPS面板的可视角度稳定性非常好。
性能 - Alder Lake和GeForce MX550
测试条件
联想Vantage应用程序提供了一个 "智能冷却 "模式,但在我们的测试中,这个模式在短时间内对性能产生了负面影响。因此,在我们的基准测试和测量中,我们停用了这种模式(通过应用程序或使用Fn+T组合键)。
处理器 - 酷睿i7-1260P
我们已经知道酷睿i7-1260P的Alder Lake一代,凭借其4个快速性能核心和8个效率核心,性能非常好,但英特尔处理器也因此消耗了大量的电力。在ThinkPad T14 G3中,该处理器允许消耗的最大功率达58瓦,恒定功率为42瓦。单核性能优于AMD机型,而多核性能则不相上下。
Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test
在Cinebench循环中,整体性能保持相对稳定。这里还有一个有趣的现象是与新的 猛禽湖酷睿i7-1360P的比较。的比较,它在第一次运行中具有优势,但随后下降到旧的Alder Lake处理器的水平。只有单核性能仍然略胜一筹,但总体而言,你也可以毫无顾虑地选择酷睿i7-1260P。
在电池运行时,允许处理器最大消耗32瓦,导致多核测试中的性能下降约30%。你可以在我们的技术部分找到更多的基准测试 我们的技术部分.
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P | |
Average of class Office |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (3173 - 12150, n=27) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Average of class Office (1056 - 15743, n=122, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (1155 - 1812, n=25) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Average of class Office (529 - 1995, n=121, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (1234 - 4748, n=25) | |
Average of class Office (356 - 5904, n=120, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (448 - 698, n=25) | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Average of class Office (181.3 - 764, n=120, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (549 - 2034, n=29) | |
Average of class Office (160.8 - 2642, n=120, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (165.4 - 260, n=27) | |
Average of class Office (82.6 - 284, n=118, last 2 years) |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Average of class Office (214 - 2844, n=121, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (264 - 906, n=26) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (16146 - 47064, n=25) | |
Average of class Office (4226 - 62349, n=121, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (4064 - 5791, n=25) | |
Average of class Office (2233 - 6687, n=121, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (3866 - 10570, n=25) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 | |
Average of class Office (1018 - 11980, n=122, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (1436 - 1786, n=25) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Average of class Office (510 - 1974, n=122, last 2 years) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (3.45 - 13.6, n=26) | |
Average of class Office (1.55 - 17.4, n=120, last 2 years) |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Average of class Office (31.3 - 117.5, n=120, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (40.2 - 65.7, n=25) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Average of class Office (0.4244 - 1.397, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (0.4559 - 0.727, n=25) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 | |
Average of class Office | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Average of class Office (763 - 24250, n=120, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (2176 - 10898, n=26) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Average of class Office (4027 - 102228, n=120, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (11015 - 56906, n=26) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Average of class Office (279 - 4442, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (669 - 2709, n=26) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (42571 - 82493, n=26) | |
Average of class Office (8031 - 113016, n=120, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 | |
Average of class Office (404 - 14288, n=120, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (2901 - 6975, n=26) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Average of class Office (2054 - 54365, n=120, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (5950 - 26376, n=26) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Average of class Office (5226 - 147611, n=120, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (16041 - 92356, n=26) |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (259 - 771, n=26) | |
Average of class Office (67.6 - 1018, n=120, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Average of class Office (432 - 12755, n=120, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (1237 - 5858, n=26) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (13261 - 43652, n=26) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Average of class Office (4814 - 48177, n=120, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 |
系统性能
实际上,英特尔版本的ThinkPad T14 G3也是一台反应非常灵敏的笔记本电脑,我们无法注意到任何问题。然而,我们的测试装置在合成基准测试中只显示了平均性能。这主要是由于存储性能不好,因为工作内存只在单通道配置下运行。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (5870 - 6235, n=2) | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 | |
Average of class Office (2325 - 7157, n=105, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (9729 - 10132, n=2) | |
Average of class Office (5095 - 20841, n=105, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (8189 - 9245, n=2) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Average of class Office (3041 - 10198, n=105, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (6891 - 7021, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Average of class Office (1912 - 9056, n=105, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, NVIDIA GeForce MX550 () | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Average of class Office (348 - 1891, n=106, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, NVIDIA GeForce MX550 () | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Average of class Office (393 - 1870, n=106, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, NVIDIA GeForce MX550 () | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Average of class Office (340 - 1982, n=106, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, NVIDIA GeForce MX550 () | |
Average of class Office (258 - 2017, n=106, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE |
PCMark 10 Score | 5870 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (25125 - 71544, n=25) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Office (7158 - 88119, n=121, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (24983 - 72065, n=25) | |
Average of class Office (7325 - 87297, n=121, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (23512 - 66799, n=25) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Office (7579 - 94965, n=121, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Average of class Office (44.3 - 188.3, n=122, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (77.9 - 118.4, n=21) |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
在我们的标准化延迟测试中(上网冲浪、4K YouTube视频复制和CPU负载),当前BIOS版本的测试装置在实时音频应用中的使用显示出一些明显的限制。 但也可能有一些限制是由Nvidia驱动造成的,因为几个驱动版本在这方面都存在问题。在 AMD型号的T14 G3在这方面没有任何问题。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE |
* ... smaller is better
存储解决方案
我们的测试装置使用的是1TB版本的三星PM9A1,这是980 Pro的OEM变体。虽然PCIe 4.0固态硬盘提供了非常好的传输速率,但在持续负载下一段时间后,速率会下降。然而,这在日常业务操作中没有影响。第一次启动后,有904GB的存储空间可供用户使用。你可以找到更多的SSD基准测试 这里.
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
除了集成的 Iris Xe Graphics G7处理器,联想还为我们的测试配置配备了一个专用的 GeForce MX550具备2GB的VRAM。该显卡允许最大消耗30瓦,与英特尔略显过时的iGPU相比,在基准测试中也有明显的优势。然而,集成的 Radeon 680M在AMD型号中表现出相同的水平,至少在合成测试中是如此。因此,我们必须问一个问题,为什么你在这里需要额外的显卡。
另一方面,在实际的游戏基准测试中,GeForce GPU与集成的Radeon 680M相比有一点优势,但这一优势并不明显。那些喜欢在结束工作后在工作用笔记本电脑上玩一轮游戏的人,明显更适合使用 申科视界14和德 RTX 3050 Ti,比如说。
在持续负载和电池运行的情况下,图形性能保持稳定。你可以在我们的技术部分找到更多的GPU基准测试 我们的技术部分.
3DMark 11 Performance | 10068 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5764 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 2695 points | |
Help |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX550 () | |
Average of class Office (94 - 236, n=4, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
Average of class Office (155 - 675, n=6, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX550 () | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Average of class Office (343 - 3786, n=109, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX550 () | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD | |
Average of class Office (322 - 1215, n=18, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating - Percent | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Average of class Office |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Average of class Office (2.66 - 34, n=110, last 2 years) |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Average of class Office (3.35 - 47.8, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Average of class Office (2.03 - 35.7, n=102, last 2 years) |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Average of class Office (6.6 - 56.5, n=96, last 2 years) |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Average of class Office (7.8 - 121.2, n=123, last 2 years) |
The Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | 4K | |
GTA V (2015) | 159.9 | 152.3 | 73.4 | 33.7 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 149 | 89 | 48 | 24 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 142.1 | 127 | 110.4 | 101.1 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 69.2 | 34.3 | 20.8 | ||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 109.9 | 95.2 | 73.4 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 95 | 40 | 32 | 30 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 147 | 59 | 51 | 45 | |
F1 2021 (2021) | 152.7 | 53.5 | 47.4 | 25.7 | |
F1 22 (2022) | 59.4 | 51.3 | 41.2 | 28.1 |
排放和电源管理
噪声水平
ThinkPad T14 G3的英特尔型号在低负载下是一个非常安静的伙伴,但风扇的高速旋转有点令人讨厌。 即使速度迅速降低,风扇最初的转速也非常明显。在更大的负载下,该设备的整体噪音也比AMD版本略大,我们在游戏和压力测试中测得的最大噪音几乎达到40 dB(A)。我们的测试设备不产生任何其他电子噪音。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.6 / 23.6 / 23.6 dB(A) |
Load |
| 35.1 / 39.6 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.6 dB(A) |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 GeForce MX550, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, Kioxia BG5 KBG5AZNV512G | HP EliteBook 840 G9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1280P, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 1% | -3% | -14% | 0% | |
off / environment * | 23.6 | 24.2 -3% | 24.3 -3% | 24.4 -3% | 23.5 -0% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.6 | 24.2 -3% | 24.5 -4% | 24.4 -3% | 23.5 -0% |
Idle Average * | 23.6 | 24.2 -3% | 24.5 -4% | 24.4 -3% | 23.5 -0% |
Idle Maximum * | 23.6 | 25.8 -9% | 26 -10% | 27.8 -18% | 25.9 -10% |
Load Average * | 35.1 | 32.2 8% | 32.3 8% | 43.3 -23% | 33.8 4% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 39.6 | 34.1 14% | 39 2% | 48.2 -22% | 35.4 11% |
Load Maximum * | 39.6 | 38.8 2% | 44.7 -13% | 48.8 -23% | 40.6 -3% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
联想对ThinkPad T14 G3的表面温度总体上有很好的把握,但在低负载下,不幸的是,该设备已经比AMD型号的温度略高。在更大的负载下,我们测量的最高温度略高于40℃(104°F),所以这并不导致任何限制,你仍然可以舒适地打字,也可以把设备放在腿上。
在压力测试期间,GPU性能保持稳定,约为30瓦,但处理器在几分钟后不得不大规模地节制其性能,从最高50瓦下降到只有15瓦。如果你看一下消耗量,你也可以立即看到,65瓦的电源在这里永远无法提供足够的功率,但后面会有更多的内容。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.4 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.5 °C / 94.1 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-6.8 °C / -12.2 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 Intel Core i7-1260P, NVIDIA GeForce MX550 | Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M | HP EliteBook 840 G9 Intel Core i7-1280P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 6% | 27% | -3% | 7% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 46.4 | 48.2 -4% | 32.8 29% | 48.4 -4% | 43.1 7% |
Maximum Bottom * | 43.1 | 52.8 -23% | 36.6 15% | 57.1 -32% | 42 3% |
Idle Upper Side * | 33.9 | 24.4 28% | 21.6 36% | 28.1 17% | 29.4 13% |
Idle Bottom * | 31.4 | 24.5 22% | 22.2 29% | 29 8% | 29.4 6% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
消耗功率
英特尔型号的耗电量比 AMD版本在所有情况下,甚至在空闲运行时也是如此(但不同的面板也可能在这里起作用)。此外,65瓦的电源在负载下的尺寸不够大,因为设备在这里的前三分钟必须从电池中吸取电能,电池容量也下降到~95%。只有在处理器达到15瓦的水平后(见上文),电源才能够在压力测试期间提供足够的电力。
我们不得不说,联想显然限制了这种情况下的性能。使用100瓦的电源,我们能够在压力测试开始时测量到101瓦的最大消耗量,然后在~85瓦时趋于平缓。有了这个,CPU的性能也会更好,但另一方面,这也会对风扇噪音和表面温度产生影响。
Off / Standby | 0.33 / 0.8 Watt |
Idle | 4.3 / 6.2 / 7 Watt |
Load |
63.5 / 66.1 Watt |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 GeForce MX550, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, Kioxia BG5 KBG5AZNV512G | HP EliteBook 840 G9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1280P, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 26% | 10% | -63% | -55% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.3 | 2.4 44% | 2.2 49% | 7.5 -74% | 6.5 -51% |
Idle Average * | 6.2 | 5.3 15% | 5.3 15% | 10.4 -68% | 13.7 -121% |
Idle Maximum * | 7 | 5.6 20% | 8.5 -21% | 11.4 -63% | 14.4 -106% |
Load Average * | 63.5 | 39.7 37% | 54.3 14% | 83.3 -31% | 64.6 -2% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 52.5 | 42.8 18% | 51 3% | 92.7 -77% | 57.2 -9% |
Load Maximum * | 66.1 | 50.6 23% | 67.3 -2% | 110.3 -67% | 90.9 -38% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test
Power Consumption with External Monitor
电池寿命
同样的行为在电池测试中继续,在我们的两次WLAN测试中,英特尔型号明显超过了AMD版本(一次在全亮度,然后在150cd/m²)。我们测量了冲浪时的7-8小时,而AMD型号持续了约9.5-13小时。
Pros
Cons
结论--ThinkPad T14 G3的AMD性能更好
单看ThinkPad T14 G3,它是一款不错的商务笔记本电脑,同样是英特尔/英伟达的组合,其图形性能略高于英特尔的老化iGPU。相较于 AMD版本,有几个优势,如英特尔处理器的单核性能更高,专用的GeForce MX550的游戏性能略好。此外,英特尔型号还提供Thunderbolt 4,并有一个SO-DIMM插槽,允许你扩展工作内存。
另一方面,也有一些缺点,如负载下的功耗明显较高,附带的65瓦电源太弱,导致在CPU/GPU综合负载下性能被人为扼杀。风扇的声音也变大了,电池寿命也变短了。同时,AMD处理器在多核测试中表现出相同的水平,而消耗的电量更少。
由于增加了显卡,ThinkPad T14 G3也消耗了更多的电力,而与AMD版本相比,额外的性能却非常小。因此,额外的模块几乎不值得,那些可以不使用雷电4的人如果选择AMD版的ThinkPad T14 G3,将获得更好的商务笔记本电脑,而且电池寿命更长。
另一个问题是面板情况,但这也适用于ThinkPad T14 G3的所有型号。例如,LG的面板在测试中比友达光电的型号留下了更好的印象,尽管在这两种情况下都是14英寸低功率显示屏。我们已经在早期的机型中看到了这种面板的抽奖活动,不幸的是,你永远无法提前知道使用的是哪种面板。
即使T14 G3已经在市场上销售了一段时间,英特尔 ,新的移动
Raptor Lake CPU是一个相当令人失望的整体更新,在这一点上,我们不知道AMD的新机型何时会到来。至少,我们不期望在未来几个月内有更新。</p>价格和可用性
联想ThinkPad T14 G3的英特尔版本从1012.32美元起售,Nvidia配置从1067.52美元起售。
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400
-
03/21/2023 v7
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.