结论 - Surface Laptop Ultra 有些令人失望
Microsoft 的新款 Surface Laptop Ultra 本应是一款设计用力过猛、毫不妥协的旗舰笔记本电脑。然而，经过评测，我们不得不说，它还是做出了一些妥协，而且我们不确定这些取舍是否符合目标用户的需求。你当然能获得 Nvidia 全新的 RTX Spark N1X SoC，其性能表现出色且稳定，无论是在持续负载下还是使用电池供电时都是如此。如果你想在本地运行 AI 模型，可以选配最高 128 GB 内存，还能获得一块峰值亮度超过 2000 尼特、色彩准确的超高亮度 Mini-LED 屏幕。当然，还有让 Microsoft 引以为傲的磁吸式 USB-C 接口。
然而，问题在于这块 Mini-LED 面板的实现效果不佳。首先，这是一块响应速度较慢的 IPS 面板（Mini-LED 是 IPS 屏幕与 Mini-LED 背光的组合），响应时间较长，即使搭配 120 Hz 刷新率，也会出现明显的拖影。其次，它不支持局部调光。这意味着整块面板的表现就像一块黑位偏高的 IPS 屏幕，因此黑色内容看起来会泛灰。与优秀的 Mini-LED 面板（例如 MacBook Pro 16）或高端 OLED 面板（ProArt P16）相比，这块面板影响了整体使用体验。
此外，还有其他令人失望的方面，例如不支持 SD-Express，以及仅提供一个 SSD 插槽。与尺寸更大的 ProArt P16 相比，其机身也显得相当厚重。尽管做工和结构稳固性都很出色，但转轴仍有明显晃动。总而言之，Surface Laptop Ultra 有些令人失望，尤其是考虑到其高昂的售价。
Pros
Cons
规格参数
机身、连接性和输入设备
Microsoft 采用深灰色金属机身（基础款为银色），做工精良，底座和屏幕上盖都十分稳固。深色版本不太容易沾染指纹，也很容易清洁。不过，我们对整体设计有所保留。虽然底座乍看之下相当纤薄，但其下方还有一层占地面积略小的结构。再加上 2 kg 的重量，与 16 英寸的 Asus ProArt P16 等机型相比，Surface Laptop Ultra 显得笨重得多。转轴也有些不够稳固，而且由于底座没有凹槽，打开屏幕上盖并不容易。可维护的部件仅限于风扇、电池以及唯一的 M.2-2280 SSD。背光键盘整体上使用起来非常舒适，但如果键程稍长一些会更好。触觉反馈触控板表现出色。
在连接性方面，Microsoft 对右侧的磁吸式 USB-C 充电器颇为自豪，但我们依然对其具体实现方式不太满意。它确实能用，但只能用于右侧的 USB-C 接口（接头本身的形状有所不同），而且虽然可以改变插接方向，却会挡住 USB-A 接口。SD 读卡器的传输速度不错，但遗憾的是不支持 SD-Express。Wi-Fi 7 模块的传输速度很快，1080p 网络摄像头的成像效果也不错。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 (A-DATA SD-Express 8.0 512 GB) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (22.3 - 567, n=36, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 (A-DATA SD-Express 8.0 512 GB) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (37.3 - 1455, n=35, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Networking | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
显示屏 - 亮度高，但不支持局部调光
Microsoft 采用了 Mini-LED 触摸屏，但画质存在问题。画面清晰，色彩丰富，但我们未能找到开启局部调光的方法。这意味着它的表现与普通 IPS 面板无异，黑位亮度高达 0.61，显然会影响对比度。另一个主要问题是拖影（即使在 120 Hz 模式下也是如此），由于响应时间较长，拖影非常明显。此外，Mini-LED 背光还存在闪烁现象。
唯一真正的亮点是亮度。我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件进行分析，测得 SDR 峰值亮度超过 1,000 尼特（只有启用环境光传感器的 MacBook Pro & Yoga Pro 能达到这一水平），HDR 峰值亮度则超过 2,000 尼特。Microsoft 提供了准确的 P3 和 sRGB 色彩配置文件。总体而言，竞品采用的 OLED 面板以及 MacBook Pro 的 Mini-LED 面板都能提供更出色的画质。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 1059 cd/m²
Contrast: 1736:1 (Black: 0.61 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.3 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.68}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.4 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.93}
88.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
98.4% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
99.6% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.22
CCT: 6505 K
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 LP150UD171878, Mini-LED, 3270x2180, 15", 120 Hz | Asus ProArt P16 H7607 ATNA60HC05-0, OLED, 3840x2400, 16", 120 Hz | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.2", 120 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 ATNA60KA01-0, OLED, 3200x2000, 16", 120 Hz | Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra ATNA60HR05-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -5% | -4% | -3% | -12% | |
| HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 2034 | 1644 -19% | 1737 -15% | 1600 -21% | 1182 -42% |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 99.6 | 99 -1% | 99.3 0% | 97.4 -2% | 97 -3% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 98.4 | 98.9 1% | 100 2% | 100 2% | 99.9 2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 88.8 | 89 0% | 88.2 -1% | 96.8 9% | 85.3 -4% |
| Response Times | 87% | 18% | 92% | 66% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 51 ? | 2.23 ? 96% | 43 ? 16% | 0.27 ? 99% | 0.5 ? 99% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 57.2 ? | 0.43 ? 99% | 41.2 ? 28% | 0.37 ? 99% | 0.4 ? 99% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 4650 ? | 960 ? | 14880 | 1200 | 240 ? |
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 100 | 33 67% | 90 10% | 22 78% | 100 -0% |
| Screen | 155% | -2% | 22% | 3% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1059 | 717 -32% | 710 -33% | 974 -8% | 499 -53% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1050 | 722 -31% | 682 -35% | 979 -7% | 505 -52% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 90 | 98 9% | 93 3% | 98 9% | 97 8% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.61 | 0.03 95% | |||
| Contrast (:1) | 1736 | 23900 1277% | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 1.6 -23% | 1.1 15% | 0.9 31% | 0.9 31% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.1 | 4.8 -17% | 2.1 49% | 1.7 59% | 2.1 49% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 3.3 -38% | 2.7 -13% | 1.3 46% | 1.6 33% |
| Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.19 100% | 2 110% | 2.21 100% | 2.22 99% |
| CCT | 6505 100% | 6547 99% | 6760 96% | 6751 96% | 6445 101% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 79% /
99% | 4% /
2% | 37% /
30% | 19% /
13% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 27.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 29.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 99 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (19.6 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 51 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 25.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 25.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.13 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (30.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 4650 Hz Amplitude: 100 % | ≤ 100 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 4650 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 4650 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7575 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能 - RTX Spark N1X
测试条件
Surface Laptop Ultra 仅提供默认的 Windows 电源设置。我们在基准测试中使用了最佳性能模式。
| 个人资料 | TDP | CB24 Multi | Steel Nomad | Cyberpunk 2077 QHD 超高 | 最大风扇噪声 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 最佳效率 | 65/45 W | 1505 积分 | 2485 积分 | 43.9 帧/秒 | 36.7 dB(A) |
| 均衡 | 70/52 W | 1633 积分 | 2825 积分 | 50.4 帧/秒 | 38.4 dB(A) |
| 最佳性能 | 80/62 W | 1682 积分 | 3134 积分 | 54.6 帧/秒 | 46.2 dB(A) |
| 电池（最佳性能） | 80/62 W | 1679 积分 | 2981 积分 | 52.9 fps | 46.2 dB(A) |
处理器性能
新款 Nvidia RTX Spark N1X（20 核）的处理器性能与 Asus ProArt P16 相近，优于 Intel 的 Panther Lake 型号以及 AMD 的 Zen 5 芯片。不过，Apple 的 M5 Pro 和 M5 Max CPU 要快得多。在持续负载和电池供电下，性能保持稳定。有关新款 RTX Spark N1X CPU 的更多性能和能效测试，请参阅我们的综合分析文章。下图展示了原生 CPU 基准测试结果，我们还在下方提供了模拟运行的基准测试结果。
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
| CPU Performance rating | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (1682 - 1726, n=2) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (327 - 2490, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (72.5 - 201, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (130 - 131, n=2) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Geekbench 6.7 / Multi-Core | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (20031 - 20296, n=2) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4983 - 30057, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 6.7 / Single-Core | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (3092 - 3096, n=2) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1591 - 4336, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
Cinebench R15 多核循环测试
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance rating | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max -11! | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (16591 - 17944, n=2) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4861 - 33362, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1237 - 2459, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (1314 - 1317, n=2) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1887 - 12912, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (6184 - 6679, n=2) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (482 - 833, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (485 - 488, n=2) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (3575 - 3677, n=2) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (856 - 5224, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (184.8 - 326, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (255 - 257, n=2) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Average of class Multimedia (100 - 557, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (192 - 195, n=2) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (81294 - 82683, n=2) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (26062 - 130368, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4526 - 7337, n=52, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (5669 - 5677, n=2) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6.08 - 36.1, n=52, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (12.5 - 12.6, n=2) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (59.5 - 64.2, n=2) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (23.9 - 72.5, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (0.52 - 0.538, n=2) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (0.3903 - 0.609, n=52, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
| Performance rating | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 -1! | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra -1! | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 -1! | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core -1! | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 -1! | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (2214 - 50388, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (11573 - 11989, n=2) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (12867 - 201874, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (43518 - 45056, n=2) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (4319 - 4431, n=2) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (626 - 8623, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Average of class Multimedia (13483 - 181505, n=30, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (886 - 28794, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (3995 - 4077, n=2) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6395 - 105740, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (24955 - 26051, n=2) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (109563 - 116546, n=2) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8171 - 126790, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (1365 - 1445, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (143.8 - 2022, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1014 - 26875, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (6259 - 6472, n=2) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (77372 - 77724, n=2) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8187 - 88533, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU CheckMate | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (569 - 4742, n=23, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (1279 - 1342, n=2) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
系统和存储设备
系统性能出色，Surface Laptop Ultra 的响应也非常迅速。我们也没有发现任何稳定性问题，对于全新一代芯片来说，这一点值得肯定。ARM 版 Windows 仍可能存在兼容性问题，但在这一点上，我们必须称赞 Microsoft，因为他们在官方规格中提到了这个问题。我们的评测机配备了 SK hynix 的 1 TB PCIe 5.0 SSD。部分基准测试的结果偏低，但 DiskSpeed 测得的速度超过 14 GB/s，而且这一性能可以持续保持。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 4: Overall
WebXPRT 5: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core, NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 -1! | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (866 - 3231, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core, NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU (1579 - 1750, n=2) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (931 - 2677, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core, NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU (1386 - 1488, n=2) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (907 - 4522, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core, NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU (1838 - 2102, n=2) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (605 - 2073, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core, NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU (1481 - 1641, n=2) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core, NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU (393 - 408, n=2) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (167.3 - 415, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| WebXPRT 5 / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (107 - 124, n=19, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core, NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU (107 - 107, n=2) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (228 - 835, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core, NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU (290 - 293, n=2) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
* ... smaller is better
» No benchmarks for this notebook found!
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (153516 - 157183, n=2) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (11299 - 157183, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (133601 - 134029, n=2) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (11624 - 174586, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (225242 - 225987, n=2) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (11755 - 225987, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Average of class Multimedia (84.1 - 535, n=47, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
* ... smaller is better
* ... smaller is better
磁盘限速：DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8
GPU 和游戏性能
GPU 性能与 GeForce RTX 5070 非常接近，但正如我们在Asus ProArt P16 评测中所见，RTX Spark GPU 受益于统一内存，甚至能够处理光线追踪或路径追踪，而这即使对 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 来说也是一项挑战。有关更多 AI 和内容创作基准测试，请参阅我们的 RTX Spark N1X 分析。
在游戏性能方面，需要注意的是，大多数游戏必须通过模拟运行，这会损耗性能，而且部分游戏目前尚不兼容，例如 Call of Duty、Battlefield 6 或 F1 25。不过，我们预计这种情况很快就会改善。我们在 Surface Laptop Ultra 上运行 GTA V 时也遇到了性能问题，而 ProArt P16 上则没有出现这种情况。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 27011 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 22706 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 12832 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 3134 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 12900 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
| Average of class Multimedia (12 - 105, n=18, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU (n=1) | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
| Average of class Multimedia (20 - 186, n=18, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU (n=1) | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| Average of class Multimedia (133 - 1042, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 | |
| Average NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU (337 - 350, n=2) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom METAL | |
| Average of class Multimedia (17.8 - 68, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
* ... smaller is better
| Cyberpunk 2077 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6.41 - 112.3, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7.61 - 144.4, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (13.3 - 303, n=52, last 2 years) | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (30.3 - 170.9, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (16.9 - 103, n=52, last 2 years) | |
Cyberpunk 2077 超高画质 FPS 图表
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 111.1 | 106.1 | 99.7 | 97.4 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 140.4 | 117.9 | 95.7 | 83.5 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 68.6 | 70.5 | 55 | ||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 350 | 230 | 213 | 192 | 140 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 97.4 | 75.8 | |||
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 99.3 | 96.1 | 85.6 | 76.6 | 54.6 |
排放与功耗
系统噪声
Surface Laptop Ultra 在空闲和轻负载时通常非常安静，甚至完全无声。较厚的机身结构也有助于降低风扇噪声，例如，与更纤薄的 Asus ProArt P16 相比，其最大风扇噪声低约 5 dB(A)，最高为 46 dB(A)。不过，负载结束后，风扇仍会以约 36 dB(A) 的噪声水平持续运转几分钟，这有点令人烦恼。而且还要过很久，风扇才会再次停转。我们没有注意到其他电子噪声。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 24 / 24 / 26 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 27.8 / 46.2 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A) | ||
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 Spark RTX N1X 20-Core, RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU | Asus ProArt P16 H7607 Spark RTX N1X 20-Core, RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max M5 Max, M5 Max 40-Core GPU | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra Ultra 7 356H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -11% | -7% | -12% | -8% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 24 | 24 -0% | 24.8 -3% | 24.1 -0% | 25.1 -5% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 24 | 24 -0% | 24.8 -3% | 24.1 -0% | 25.1 -5% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 24 | 24 -0% | 24.8 -3% | 24.1 -0% | 25.1 -5% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 26 | 30.1 -16% | 24.8 5% | 25.1 3% | 25.1 3% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 27.8 | 38.7 -39% | 33.8 -22% | 44.2 -59% | 36.9 -33% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 46.2 | 51.1 -11% | 48.9 -6% | 52.7 -14% | 48.5 -5% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 46.2 | 51.1 -11% | 53.9 -17% | 52.7 -14% | 48.5 -5% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
轻负载下，机身保持十分凉爽，即使在满载时，表面温度也不会过高。键盘区域中央会明显发热，但仍可正常打字，底板后部最高 45 °C 的温度也不成问题。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.2 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.9 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 38.3 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the class Multimedia.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.3 °C / 90.1 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (-3.6 °C / -6.4 F).
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 Spark RTX N1X 20-Core, RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU | Asus ProArt P16 H7607 Spark RTX N1X 20-Core, RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max M5 Max, M5 Max 40-Core GPU | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra Ultra 7 356H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -2% | 11% | 2% | 4% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 47.2 | 43 9% | 43.3 8% | 41.8 11% | 42.7 10% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 44.9 | 48.6 -8% | 42.9 4% | 47.9 -7% | 49.1 -9% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 27.8 | 28.2 -1% | 23.4 16% | 26.3 5% | 25.4 9% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 27.4 | 29.3 -7% | 23.5 14% | 27.6 -1% | 25.5 7% |
* ... smaller is better
扬声器
音响系统（四个模块）表现不错，但还无法完全媲美 Asus ProArt P16、Apple MacBook Pro 16 或 Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra 等设备。
Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Asus ProArt P16 H7607 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 0.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 6.2% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
功耗和电池续航时间
明亮的 Mini-LED 面板使 SDR 模式下的最大待机功耗增加至约 24 瓦。压力测试期间的最大功耗为 145 瓦，但很快就稳定在约 130 瓦，因此 140W 电源适配器足够使用（未使用电池供电）。
电池续航（92 Wh）并不出色，在亮度为 150 尼特的 Wi-Fi 测试中为 10.5 小时，而在 SDR 最高亮度下仅为 4.5 小时。我们还在更合理的 500 尼特亮度下测试了 Wi-Fi 续航，结果为 7 小时多一点。
| Off / Standby | 0.27 / 0.53 Watt |
| Idle | 6.7 / 22.7 / 24 Watt |
| Load |
/ 145.1 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU, Spark RTX N1X 20-Core, SK hynix PCB01 HFS001TFM9X179N GL | Asus ProArt P16 H7607 RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU, Spark RTX N1X 20-Core, SanDisk PC SN5100S 2TB | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max M5 Max 40-Core GPU, M5 Max, Apple SSD AP2048Z | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101 | Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ultra 7 356H, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 6% | 19% | -11% | 24% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 6.7 | 7.7 -15% | 2.7 60% | 8.8 -31% | 4.4 34% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 22.7 | 13.4 41% | 13.3 41% | 16.1 29% | 6.4 72% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 24 | 13.7 43% | 13.5 44% | 16.5 31% | 7.1 70% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 115.4 | 134.5 -17% | 128.9 -12% | 160.6 -39% | 134.3 -16% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 115.7 | 131.3 -13% | 136.7 -18% | 157.9 -36% | 133 -15% |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 145.1 | 146.8 -1% | 150.3 -4% | 177.4 -22% | 143.9 1% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 141 | 89.3 | 55.1 |
* ... smaller is better
《Cyberpunk》/ 压力测试功耗
外接显示器功耗
Notebookcheck 评分
Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026
- 10/19/2026 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Total Sustainability Score: 对比中的潜在竞争对手
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 87.1%  | Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra 2026 Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core ⎘ NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $3,699.99 Surface Laptop Ultra - 15" -... 2. $3,999.99 Surface Laptop Ultra - 15" -... 3. $2,599.99 Surface Laptop Ultra - 15" -... List Price: 5094€ | 2 kg | 18 mm | 15.00" 3270x2180 262 PPI Mini-LED |
2. 90.3%  | Asus ProArt P16 H7607 Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core ⎘ NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU ⎘ 128 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $6,199.00 HIDevolution [2025] ASUS Pro... 2. $4,599.00 HIDevolution [2025] ASUS Pro... 3. $469.00 ASUS ProArt 27" 4K UHD Monit... List Price: 6699€ | 1.8 kg | 13 mm | 16.00" 3840x2400 283 PPI OLED |
3. 92.4%  | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max Apple M5 Max ⎘ Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU ⎘ 48 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | List Price: 5699€ | 2.1 kg | 16.8 mm | 16.20" 3456x2234 254 PPI Mini-LED |
4. 90.4%  | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 2800€ | 1.9 kg | 17.9 mm | 16.00" 3200x2000 236 PPI OLED |
5. 90.7%  | Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 356H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1000 GB SSD | List Price: 3599€ | 1.9 kg | 15.4 mm | 16.00" 2880x1800 212 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
