Notebookcheck

MSI GE75 Raider 9SG (Core i9-9880H, RTX 2080) 笔记本电脑评测

酷睿 i9-9880H的首次亮相。 相比于去年较为失败的第8代Core i9-8950HK,第9代Core i9-9880H实际上是一个很好的选择,特别是如果你重视同时拥有的大量线程,游戏玩家也将受益于相比较i7-8750H的略微性能提升。
Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (translated by Zewei Shen),
Coffee Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook MSI
MSI GE75 9SG (GE75 Series)
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile - 8192 MB, Core: 1380 MHz, Memory: 1750 MHz, GDDR6, 430.64, Optimus
Memory
32768 MB 
, DDR4-2666, PC4-21300, 19-19-19-43, 双通道
Display
17.3 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, Chi Mei N173HCE-G33, AHVA, CMN175C, 144 Hz, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel HM370
Storage
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, 1024 GB 
Soundcard
NVIDIA TU104 - High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm headphones, 3.5 mm microphone, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC
Networking
Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5)
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 27.5 x 397 x 268.5
Battery
65 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD (720p)
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声扬声器, Keyboard: 巧克力键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, Dragon Center 2.5, Norton Security, MSI True Color, SteelSeries Engine 3, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
2.66 kg, Power Supply: 978 g
Price
3300 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

428 mm 314 mm 58 mm 4.6 kg428 mm 314 mm 30 mm 3.7 kg419 mm 287 mm 30 mm 2.9 kg399 mm 279 mm 27.6 mm 2.7 kg397 mm 268.5 mm 27.5 mm 2.7 kg399 mm 272 mm 19 mm 2.6 kg393 mm 266 mm 18.9 mm 2.4 kg
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
176.6 MB/s ∼100% +551%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80 MB/s ∼45% +195%
MSI GE75 9SG
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27.14 MB/s ∼15%
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26 MB/s ∼15% -4%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
207.82 MB/s ∼100% +527%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s ∼42% +162%
MSI GE75 9SG
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
33.17 MB/s ∼16%
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
32 MB/s ∼15% -4%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
686 MBit/s ∼100% +4%
Acer Predator Triton 700
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
682 MBit/s ∼99% +3%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
661 MBit/s ∼96%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
271 (min: 246, max: 281) MBit/s ∼40% -59%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
681 MBit/s ∼100% 0%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
680 MBit/s ∼100%
Acer Predator Triton 700
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
551 MBit/s ∼81% -19%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
327 (min: 275, max: 394) MBit/s ∼48% -52%
376.4
cd/m²
393.6
cd/m²
362.8
cd/m²
358.6
cd/m²
400.7
cd/m²
361.7
cd/m²
358.8
cd/m²
383.3
cd/m²
356.3
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Chi Mei N173HCE-G33
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 400.7 cd/m² Average: 372.5 cd/m² Minimum: 21.44 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 400.7 cd/m²
Contrast: 1179:1 (Black: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.33 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9, calibrated: 1.39
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
92.1% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 58.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.24
MSI GE75 9SG
Chi Mei N173HCE-G33, AHVA, 17.3, 1920x1080
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AU Optronics B173HAN04.2, IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN, 17.3, 1920x1080
Acer Predator Triton 700
AUO B156HAN04.2 (AUO42ED), IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
Chi Mei N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN WLED, 17.3, 1920x1080
Response Times
-383%
-23%
1%
-435%
-133%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
7.2 (3.8, 3.4)
40 (20, 20)
-456%
7.2 (3.6, 3.6)
-0%
8 (4.4, 3.6)
-11%
44.8 (21.2, 23.6)
-522%
28 (16.4, 11.6)
-289%
Response Time Black / White *
6.6 (3.2, 3.4)
27 (16, 11)
-309%
9.6 (4.4, 5.2)
-45%
5.6 (3.8, 1.8)
15%
29.6 (15.6, 14)
-348%
13.6 (11.8, 1.8)
-106%
PWM Frequency
26040 (10)
26000 (19)
0%
25000 (14)
-4%
Screen
-34%
-17%
-14%
-94%
-40%
Brightness middle
400.7
322
-20%
288
-28%
240
-40%
291
-27%
273
-32%
Brightness
372
303
-19%
287
-23%
248
-33%
277
-26%
273
-27%
Brightness Distribution
89
84
-6%
91
2%
83
-7%
84
-6%
90
1%
Black Level *
0.34
0.32
6%
0.2
41%
0.22
35%
0.22
35%
0.26
24%
Contrast
1179
1006
-15%
1440
22%
1091
-7%
1323
12%
1050
-11%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.33
2.97
-123%
2.33
-75%
2.14
-61%
5.52
-315%
3.52
-165%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.51
5.08
-45%
5.34
-52%
5.04
-44%
10.72
-205%
6.34
-81%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.39
2.29
-65%
2.47
-78%
1.54
-11%
2.09
-50%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.3
2.26
-74%
1.19
8%
1.62
-25%
6.59
-407%
3.11
-139%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.45 90%
2.41 91%
2.28 96%
2.44 90%
2.43 91%
CCT
6735 97%
6892 94%
6710 97%
6846 95%
7816 83%
6999 93%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
58.2
57
-2%
57
-2%
77
32%
58
0%
76
31%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
92.1
87
-6%
88
-4%
100
9%
89
-3%
100
9%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-209% / -87%
-20% / -18%
-7% / -11%
-265% / -151%
-87% / -60%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.2 ms rise
↘ 3.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
7.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.8 ms rise
↘ 3.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.3 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 26040 Hz ≤ 10 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 26040 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 26040 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 50 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18082 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970980990100010101020103010401050106010701080109011001110112011301140115011601170118011901200121012201230124012501260127012801290130013101320133013401350136013701380139014001410142014301440145014601470148014901500151015201530154015501560157015801590160016101620163016401650166016701680169017001710172017301740175017601770178017901800181018201830184018501860187018801890190019101920193019401950Tooltip
MSI GE75 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1619 (1602.44-1728.31)
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1887 (1855.46-1948.65)
Eurocom Sky X4C GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700K, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1307 (1221.26-1330.45)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
Intel Core i9-9900K
212 Points ∼95% +12%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
205 Points ∼92% +8%
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Core i7-8700K
192 Points ∼86% +2%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
190 Points ∼85% +1%
Average Intel Core i9-9880H
  (181 - 198, n=10)
190 Points ∼85% +1%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
189 Points ∼84%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
Intel Core i7-8750H
176.28 Points ∼79% -7%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
Intel Core i5-9300H
176 Points ∼79% -7%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
175 Points ∼78% -7%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
142 Points ∼63% -25%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
Intel Core i9-9900K
1968 Points ∼45% +14%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
1721 Points ∼39%
Average Intel Core i9-9880H
  (1317 - 1721, n=10)
1505 Points ∼34% -13%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1378 Points ∼31% -20%
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Core i7-8700K
1359 Points ∼31% -21%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
1115 Points ∼25% -35%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
Intel Core i7-8750H
1068.63 (min: 913.12, max: 1068.63) Points ∼24% -38%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
897 Points ∼20% -48%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
Intel Core i5-9300H
757 Points ∼17% -56%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
742 Points ∼17% -57%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average Intel Core i9-9880H
  (441 - 474, n=6)
457 Points ∼86% +4%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
441 Points ∼83%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
429 Points ∼81% -3%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
362 Points ∼68% -18%
CPU (Multi Core)
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
3712 Points ∼37%
Average Intel Core i9-9880H
  (2953 - 3712, n=6)
3277 Points ∼33% -12%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
2427 Points ∼24% -35%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
1685 Points ∼17% -55%
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
15071
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
42456
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
6967
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
82.03 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
18.94 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.11 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
133.39 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1721 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
189 Points
Help
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, Transcend TS1TMTE850
8740 Points ∼68% +4%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
8732 Points ∼67% +4%
MSI GE75 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
8419 Points ∼65%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
7697 Points ∼59% -9%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
4451 Points ∼34% -47%
Productivity
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
8968 Points ∼86% +7%
MSI GE75 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
8416 Points ∼81%
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, Transcend TS1TMTE850
8277 Points ∼79% -2%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
7759 Points ∼74% -8%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
6209 Points ∼60% -26%
Essentials
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, Transcend TS1TMTE850
9777 Points ∼85% +2%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
9776 Points ∼85% +2%
MSI GE75 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
9608 Points ∼84%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
8968 Points ∼78% -7%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
7471 Points ∼65% -22%
Score
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
6558 Points ∼81% +4%
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, Transcend TS1TMTE850
6387 Points ∼79% +1%
MSI GE75 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6306 Points ∼78%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
5816 Points ∼72% -8%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
4237 Points ∼52% -33%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, Transcend TS1TMTE850
6055 Points ∼92% +1%
MSI GE75 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6004 Points ∼91%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
5801 Points ∼88% -3%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
5574 Points ∼85% -7%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
4877 Points ∼74% -19%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, Transcend TS1TMTE850
5859 Points ∼96% +29%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
5720 Points ∼94% +26%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
4918 Points ∼81% +8%
MSI GE75 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4550 Points ∼75%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
4041 Points ∼66% -11%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4550 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
6004 points
Help
MSI GE75 9SG
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
Acer Predator Triton 700
2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
AS SSD
-28%
9%
10%
-2%
-84%
Copy Game MB/s
1054.21
474.73
-55%
295.55
-72%
Copy Program MB/s
198.24
234.73
18%
192.94
-3%
Copy ISO MB/s
3193.07
686.8
-78%
412.55
-87%
Score Total
4899
2405
-51%
4771
-3%
4066
-17%
3282
-33%
881
-82%
Score Write
2127
878
-59%
2091
-2%
1553
-27%
1243
-42%
254
-88%
Score Read
1805
1026
-43%
1721
-5%
1691
-6%
1350
-25%
417
-77%
Access Time Write *
0.05
0.044
12%
0.031
38%
0.038
24%
0.041
18%
0.097
-94%
Access Time Read *
0.067
0.063
6%
0.08
-19%
0.056
16%
0.062
7%
0.235
-251%
4K-64 Write
1799.48
708.48
-61%
1733.9
-4%
1235.98
-31%
913.1
-49%
172.7
-90%
4K-64 Read
1641.92
848.05
-48%
1576.8
-4%
1346.92
-18%
1056.86
-36%
351.41
-79%
4K Write
89.17
86.84
-3%
122.46
37%
97.68
10%
92.99
4%
38.34
-57%
4K Read
27.02
35.71
32%
53.01
96%
38.37
42%
41.47
53%
14.07
-48%
Seq Write
2381.34
828.44
-65%
2347.01
-1%
2196.29
-8%
2371.95
0%
425.71
-82%
Seq Read
1358.11
1418.7
4%
910.97
-33%
3058.28
125%
2517.2
85%
511.18
-62%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3087 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2399 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 453.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 337.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1465 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2370 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 44.98 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 116.1 MB/s
3DMark
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H
5538 Points ∼59%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
4655 Points ∼49% -16%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
3721 Points ∼40% -33%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H
3020 Points ∼32% -45%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X
11294 Points ∼75% +16%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H
9816 Points ∼65% +1%
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H
9754 Points ∼65%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
8512 Points ∼57% -13%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700
6977 Points ∼47% -28%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
6716 Points ∼45% -31%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H
5783 Points ∼39% -41%
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
5697 Points ∼38% -42%
Schenker Compact 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
5408 Points ∼36% -45%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H
1789 Points ∼12% -82%
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X
10820 Points ∼73% +17%
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H
9266 Points ∼63%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H
9018 Points ∼61% -3%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
8098 Points ∼55% -13%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700
6942 Points ∼47% -25%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
6639 Points ∼45% -28%
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
5773 Points ∼39% -38%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H
5679 Points ∼38% -39%
Schenker Compact 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
5569 Points ∼38% -40%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H
1909 Points ∼13% -79%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X
27620 Points ∼68% +12%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H
25203 Points ∼62% +2%
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H
24623 Points ∼61%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
21515 Points ∼53% -13%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700
21104 Points ∼52% -14%
Acer Predator Triton 700
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
18120 Points ∼45% -26%
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
17980 Points ∼44% -27%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
17335 Points ∼43% -30%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H
15731 Points ∼39% -36%
Schenker Compact 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
14193 Points ∼35% -42%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H
9292 Points ∼23% -62%
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK
7374 Points ∼18% -70%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H
6331 Points ∼16% -74%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H
16523 Points ∼73%
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X
13644 Points ∼60% -17%
Schenker Compact 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
12916 Points ∼57% -22%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700
12643 Points ∼56% -23%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
11825 Points ∼52% -28%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
11625 Points ∼51% -30%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H
11339 Points ∼50% -31%
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
11115 Points ∼49% -33%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H
9159 Points ∼41% -45%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H
9099 Points ∼40% -45%
Acer Predator Triton 700
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
9075 Points ∼40% -45%
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK
8450 Points ∼37% -49%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H
6399 Points ∼28% -61%
1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X
37989 Points ∼74% +12%
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H
34050 Points ∼67%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H
33741 Points ∼66% -1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
29453 Points ∼58% -14%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700
28621 Points ∼56% -16%
Acer Predator Triton 700
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
23694 Points ∼46% -30%
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
23261 Points ∼45% -32%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
22005 Points ∼43% -35%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H
20157 Points ∼39% -41%
Schenker Compact 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
18750 Points ∼37% -45%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H
13125 Points ∼26% -61%
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK
9032 Points ∼18% -73%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H
8220 Points ∼16% -76%
3DMark 06 Standard
39973 points
3DMark 11 Performance
27116 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
41840 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
18947 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
9266 points
Help
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop)
110 fps ∼100% +1%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
109 fps ∼99%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
  (69 - 124, n=7)
103 fps ∼94% -6%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
99 fps ∼90% -9%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
78 (min: 42) fps ∼71% -28%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
65 fps ∼59% -40%
Schenker Compact 15
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
65 (min: 43) fps ∼59% -40%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
44 (min: 9) fps ∼40% -60%
0102030405060708090100Tooltip
MSI GE75 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR: Ø89.4 (84-96)
low med. high ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 341.4 303.9 280.7 190.9 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 289.7 250.1 173 95.3 fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 250.6 187.2 161.7 144.3 fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 146 120 115 109 fps
MSI GE75 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, Transcend TS1TMTE850
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
Noise
-9%
-18%
-1%
-9%
-3%
off / environment *
28.2
30
-6%
30
-6%
29
-3%
30
-6%
30
-6%
Idle Minimum *
30.4
30
1%
36
-18%
29
5%
32
-5%
32
-5%
Idle Average *
30.4
34
-12%
37
-22%
32
-5%
34
-12%
33
-9%
Idle Maximum *
33.4
37
-11%
43
-29%
33
1%
37
-11%
34
-2%
Load Average *
37.1
52
-40%
50
-35%
47
-27%
43
-16%
41
-11%
Witcher 3 ultra *
54.2
53
2%
57
-5%
49
10%
57
-5%
50
8%
Load Maximum *
56.4
54
4%
61
-8%
51
10%
62
-10%
54
4%

* ... smaller is better

Noise Level

Idle
30.4 / 30.4 / 33.4 dB(A)
Load
37.1 / 56.4 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 28.2 dB(A)
Max. Load
 45 °C45 °C43.6 °C 
 38.4 °C48.8 °C36 °C 
 30.8 °C28.4 °C29.6 °C 
Maximum: 48.8 °C
Average: 38.4 °C
52 °C45 °C51.8 °C
29.6 °C29 °C39.6 °C
25.6 °C26.6 °C27 °C
Maximum: 52 °C
Average: 36.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  50 °C | Room Temperature 20.4 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.8 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 39.7 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 42.5 °C / 109 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-3.2 °C / -5.8 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.744.52538.440.53138.738.84038.740.5503742.16335.443.48034.946.710034.253.31253457.116032.461.82003265.92503269.131531.47140030.366.350029.571.763029.382.980029.285.3100029.280.4125028.976.5160028.580.7200028.886.6250028.583.1315028.377.6400028.174.9500028.275.3630028.171.780002874.9100002880.91250027.679.61600027.775.2SPL40.892.9N497.9median 28.9median 75.2Delta1.96.435.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMSI GE75 9SGApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI GE75 9SG audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.06 / 1.6 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 13.9 / 18.8 / 23.1 Watt
Load midlight 112.3 / 291.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
MSI GE75 9SG
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, AHVA, 1920x1080, 17.3
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ, AHVA, 1920x1080, 17.3
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0), TN, 1920x1080, 17.3
Acer Predator Triton 700
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY, TN WLED, 1920x1080, 17.3
Power Consumption
19%
-3%
-61%
-31%
4%
Idle Minimum *
13.9
7
50%
19
-37%
31
-123%
28
-101%
15
-8%
Idle Average *
18.8
15
20%
22
-17%
35
-86%
33
-76%
20
-6%
Idle Maximum *
23.1
22
5%
30
-30%
45
-95%
41
-77%
26
-13%
Load Average *
112.3
92
18%
104
7%
130
-16%
94
16%
97
14%
Witcher 3 ultra *
231
207
10%
167
28%
268
-16%
160
31%
186
19%
Load Maximum *
291.5
254
13%
203
30%
374
-28%
222
24%
239
18%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
4h 54min
MSI GE75 9SG
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 65 Wh
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
R5 3550H, Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), 64 Wh
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh
Acer Predator Triton 700
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 54 Wh
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 51 Wh
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 65 Wh
Battery Runtime
46%
-22%
-51%
-37%
-4%
Reader / Idle
757
298
150
303
468
WiFi v1.3
294
430
46%
230
-22%
144
-51%
186
-37%
281
-4%
Load
122
52
70
38
53
Witcher 3 ultra
50

Pros

+ 尺寸和重量在满血RTX 2080 17英寸游戏笔记本电脑中较小
+ 相比较Core i7-8750H的多线程性能提升
+ 游戏性能略强一些
+ 易于维修和升级
+ 非常响亮的四音箱设计
+ 单键RGB照明

Cons

- 比较严重的屏幕漏光
- CPU负载下温度高
- 拆机影响保修
- 稍高的功耗
- 玩游戏时仍然很吵闹
- 还是没有雷电3
- SD卡读卡器速度慢
- 没有G-Sync
MSI GE75 9SG笔记本电脑评测. Test model provided by MSI
MSI GE75 9SG笔记本电脑评测. Test model provided by MSI

Core i9-9880H就是Core i9-8950HK应该有的样子。这两个额外的内核使其具有相比较Core i7-8750HCore i7-9750H明显的性能优势。在考虑任何性能限制之前, i7-8750H平均性能要差约36%。

缺点来自于同模具下塞入了更多核的CPU。也就是说,当CPU完全负载时,核心温度和功耗会更高。运行Prime95时,i9-9880H稳定在90°C,而i7-8750H的SKU则为73°C。与此同时,游戏功耗231 W,而去年的GE73 8SG则仅为207 W。未充分利用所有八个内核的应用程序将比六核Core i7系列的性能提升更少。

当然,GE75 9SG只是Core i9-9880H的一个应用。 i9-9880H(2.3-3.8 GHz)的非常大的频率范围意味着其他OEM可能会有较慢的频率,从而可能比我们在此评测出的性能更差。尽管如此,我们对第9代Core i9的第一次尝试已经看起来非常有前景。

爱好者们会想要考虑第9代Core i9,特别是如果他们依赖于针对8个CPU内核优化的应用程序。游戏玩家也可以从i9-9880H中获益,尽管大多数游戏的性能提升幅度要小于10%。在任何一种情况下,与去年的Core i9-8950HK相比,新CPU处于更好的定位。

MSI GE75 9SG - 09/20/2019 v7
Allen Ngo

Chassis
75 / 98 → 76%
Keyboard
85%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
59 / 80 → 74%
Weight
59 / 10-66 → 87%
Battery
63 / 95 → 66%
Display
89%
Games Performance
98%
Application Performance
93%
Temperature
83 / 95 → 87%
Noise
75 / 90 → 84%
Audio
81%
Camera
48 / 85 → 56%
Average
77%
86%
Gaming - Weighted Average
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > MSI GE75 Raider 9SG (Core i9-9880H, RTX 2080) 笔记本电脑评测
Allen Ngo, 2019-07-14 (Update: 2019-07-14)
Allen Ngo
Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - US Editor in Chief