AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX首次亮相。雷蛇Blade 14笔记本电脑评测

现在差不多一年了,2021年的刀锋14可以在今天发布,它仍然是目前大多数(如果不是所有)14英寸笔记本电脑的顶峰。它的AMD Zen 3 Ryzen 9 5900HX CPU和GeForce RTX 3070/3080显卡在笔记本游戏领域毫不逊色,但今年的更新进一步提高了性能,采用了更新的Zen 3+ Ryzen 5900HX CPU,更快的内存,以及GeForce RTX 3070 Ti和3080 Ti显卡选项。
配置从2000美元开始,GeForce RTX 3060 和144 Hz FHD显示器,到3500美元,RTX 3080 Ti 和165 Hz QHD显示器。所有SKU都配备了相同的Ryzen 9 6900HX CPU,100W TGP目标,16GB DDR5-4800焊接内存和1TB PCIe4 x4 NVMe SSD。我们的审查单位是中间选项,配备RTX 3070 Ti和165 Hz QHD显示器,零售价约为2700美元。
刀片14的直接竞争对手是华硕Zephyrus G14系列。然而,由于14英寸游戏笔记本很少,我们也将把Blade 14与更多传统尺寸的15.6英寸或更大的型号进行比较,如微星Stealth GS66或联想Legion C7.
更多Razer评论。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
89.4 % | 05/2022 | Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 1.8 kg | 16.8 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1440 | |
87.5 % | 07/2021 | Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 1.8 kg | 16.8 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1440 | |
90.5 % | 03/2022 | Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 19.9 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1440 | |
86.5 % | 03/2022 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R R9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800S | 1.7 kg | 19.5 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
84.5 % | 02/2022 | MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.2 kg | 19.8 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | |
86.6 % | 02/2021 | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 20.9 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 |
箱子 - 小尺寸的经典Razer产品
机箱仍然与去年的版本相同,因为2022年的版本只是内部性能更新。然而,一年前的设计仍然感觉很新鲜,特别是由于14英寸游戏空间的竞争仍然稀少。它仍然比 Zephyrus G14有明显的优势,而重量也差不多,感觉更密实。当然,雷蛇用户将放弃华硕独特的AniMe Matrix LED功能,而选择更薄、更平滑的一体式结构。
我们对高端超极本所期待的一些基本功能,如指纹识别器或网络摄像头快门,仍然没有。
连接性 - 没有雷电或Razer核心的兼容性
Networking | |
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12 | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12 | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 |
网络摄像头
相机已经从去年的720p升级到今年的1080p,以获得更清晰的画面。

维护
配件和保修
盒子里有一些雷蛇的标志贴纸,还有常见的交流适配器和文件。至于保修,雷蛇在笔记本的标准一年有限保修的基础上,为每一个新购买的电池引入了两年的保护。
输入设备 - 感觉就像在超极本上打字一样
显示屏 - QHD,所有的钟声和口哨声
我们2022年的测试设备上的1440p IPS面板是TL140BDXP02-2,而我们2021年的设备是TL140BDXP02-0。其他一切都在它们之间几乎是相同的,基本上是同比的观看体验。这仍然是目前市场上唯一的14英寸机型之一,它具有原生165赫兹刷新率、FreeSync Premium、完整的DCI-P3覆盖率和快速响应时间。
值得注意的是 最新的华硕Zephyrus G14型号已经转移到16:10,而刀片14仍然是16:9。然而,与Razer不同的是,华硕型号没有165赫兹的选项。
|
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 354 cd/m²
Contrast: 957:1 (Black: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.66 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
85.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX TL140BDXP02-0, IPS, 2560x1440, 14.00 | Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 TL140BDXP02-2, IPS, 2560x1440, 14.00 | Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti BOE NE173QHM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R NE140QDM-NX1 (BOE0A1D), IPS-Level, 2560x1600, 14.00 | MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Sharp LQ156T1JW04 (SHP153C), IPS-Level, 2560x1440, 15.60 | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS AU Optronics B156ZAN05.1, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 0% | 1% | 0% | -0% | 3% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 97.2 | 97.2 0% | 98.7 2% | 97.4 0% | 96.4 -1% | 89.1 -8% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 99.9 0% | 99.9 0% | 99.9 0% | 99.7 0% | 99.9 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 85.7 | 85.4 0% | 86.2 1% | 85.5 0% | 85.6 0% | 99.1 16% |
Response Times | 16% | 10% | 55% | 55% | 42% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 16.8 ? | 16.4 ? 2% | 17.6 ? -5% | 8.8 ? 48% | 6 ? 64% | 8.2 ? 51% |
Response Time Black / White * | 15.2 ? | 10.8 ? 29% | 11.4 ? 25% | 6 ? 61% | 8.4 ? 45% | 10.4 ? 32% |
PWM Frequency | 27170 ? | |||||
Screen | -8% | -18% | -32% | -72% | -41% | |
Brightness middle | 354 | 331.1 -6% | 335.9 -5% | 480 36% | 272 -23% | 406 15% |
Brightness | 328 | 318 -3% | 294 -10% | 456 39% | 253 -23% | 407 24% |
Brightness Distribution | 86 | 91 6% | 75 -13% | 80 -7% | 87 1% | 88 2% |
Black Level * | 0.37 | 0.36 3% | 0.38 -3% | 0.48 -30% | 0.25 32% | 0.42 -14% |
Contrast | 957 | 920 -4% | 884 -8% | 1000 4% | 1088 14% | 967 1% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.66 | 2.25 -36% | 2.82 -70% | 2.62 -58% | 3.73 -125% | 4.36 -163% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.83 | 4.62 -21% | 5.04 -32% | 6.71 -75% | 9.43 -146% | 7.55 -97% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 1.7 -6% | 1.7 -6% | 4.2 -163% | 6.5 -306% | 3.1 -94% |
Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.3 96% | 2.14 103% | 2.16 102% | 2.172 101% | 2.36 93% |
CCT | 6542 99% | 6751 96% | 6382 102% | 7122 91% | 6485 100% | 6371 102% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.12 | 0.98 | 3.63 | |||
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 86.7 | |||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.9 | |||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 3% /
-3% | -2% /
-10% | 8% /
-11% | -6% /
-36% | 1% /
-18% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
15.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.4 ms rise | |
↘ 6.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.4 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
16.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.4 ms rise | |
↘ 8.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21940 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
性能 - Ryzen 9 6900HX首次亮相
测试条件
处理器 - 明显的单线程性能提升
我们在2021年刀片14的评论中指出,相对于其他H系列CPU,单线程性能令人失望。值得庆幸的是,较新的 Ryzen 9 6900HX解决了这些问题,单线程和多线程性能分别比上一代提升了约30%和10%。 Ryzen 9 5900HX对应的产品。原始多线程性能与第12代酷睿i7-12800HX相比,在个位数百分点之内。 酷睿i7-12800H在较大的 刀片17.简而言之,Blade 14确实可以提供与 "常规尺寸 "游戏笔记本电脑类似的CPU性能水平。
Ryzen 9 6900HX在较大的机箱上可能运行得更快。15.6英寸的 华硕ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS配有较早的Ryzen 9 5900HX,例如,在处理器性能方面与我们较小的Blade 14不相上下。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | 64 Bit Single-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Corsair One i300 | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (5403 - 5813, n=5) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Corsair One i300 | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (544 - 612, n=5) | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC | |
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR |
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Corsair One i300 | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (13740 - 15100, n=5) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE |
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Corsair One i300 | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (1483 - 1576, n=5) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Corsair One i300 | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (2194 - 2411, n=4) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Corsair One i300 | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (245 - 253, n=4) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR |
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU | |
Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (212 - 242, n=6) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Corsair One i300 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Corsair One i300 | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (62123 - 65357, n=5) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Corsair One i300 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (5727 - 5920, n=5) | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 | |
Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Eluktronics RP-15 |
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Corsair One i300 | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (9647 - 10490, n=5) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W |
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Corsair One i300 | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (1523 - 1604, n=5) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE | |
Eluktronics RP-15 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Corsair One i300 | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (17.6 - 18.7, n=5) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (50.1 - 65.2, n=3) | |
Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Corsair One i300 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (0.4742 - 0.4808, n=5) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Corsair One i300 |
Cinebench R23: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | 64 Bit Single-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (16192 - 17963, n=5) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (101849 - 110797, n=5) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (3480 - 3804, n=5) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (102463 - 107007, n=5) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (12861 - 13062, n=5) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (863 - 911, n=5) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (8748 - 9540, n=5) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (28094 - 30006, n=5) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 |
系统性能
PCMark结果比去年的型号略微快了几个百分点。更值得注意的是,分数与许多大型游戏笔记本电脑相当,包括 微星GE76系列.
PCMark 10 Score | 7332 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (48427 - 53345, n=5) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (50457 - 53321, n=5) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (54912 - 57246, n=5) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (83.4 - 92.3, n=5) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备 - 现在有了PCIe4 x4支持
我们对2021年刀片14的主要抱怨之一已经在2022年型号上得到解决。用户现在可以配置更快的PCIe4 x4 NVMe固态硬盘,而不是局限于PCIe3 x4速度。从我们的连续读取率 三星PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR可以达到超过6600MB/s的持续速度,而去年的三星PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR的持续速度约为3500MB/s。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能--升级不多
性能跃升来自 GeForce RTX 3070到2021年刀片14中的 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti在我们的2022型号中的性能跳跃是轻微到中等的,取决于游戏和分辨率设置。如果在较低的图形设置下,2022模型上的游戏运行速度可以达到30%至40%,而在原生1440p分辨率下的较高设置将看到更小的优势,低于10%。赛博朋克2077》就是一个很好的例子,会出现这种情况。我们怀疑Ryzen 9 5900HX的单线程CPU性能的显著提升是在CPU约束的情况下帧率更快的原因,而2022型号更快的DDR5-4800内存在高分辨率下游戏时比旧的2021型号中更慢的DDR4-3200内存贡献更大。
根据3DMark基准测试,移动RTX 3070和移动RTX 3070 Ti之间的差异相对较小,尽管在某些分辨率上运行实际游戏时,可以观察到较大的性能余量。这表明,今年的Blade 14上更快的CPU和内存对GPU的瓶颈作用较小。
目标TGP继续被限制在100W,这是性能尺度的低端。微星 MSI Vector GP66例如,微星Vector GP66配备了与我们的2022年Blade 14相同的RTX 3070 Ti GPU,但其TGP目标更高,为150 W,图形性能提高了15%至20%。
在平衡配置文件而不是最高性能配置文件上运行将对CPU和GPU的性能产生大约6%的影响。
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 15 | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (13799 - 40880, n=10) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
Dell G15 5510-43NHT | |
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM |
3DMark 11 Performance | 28006 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 60242 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 23725 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 9638 points | |
Help |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | |
1280x720 Lite Quality | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (141.1 - 207, n=7) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 15 | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 |