Notebookcheck Logo

华硕TUF游戏F17笔记本评测。良好的3D性能和电池寿命满足了暗淡的显示屏

最大的性能。 两年后,华硕终于更新了该系列的机箱,并增加了桤木湖CPU与DDR5内存和RTX GPU,在我们的案例中是RTX 3060与完整的140 W TGP。虽然这听起来很有希望,但我们需要记住,不是所有的闪光点都是金子,TUF Gaming F17有一些缺陷,我们在审查中发现了这些缺陷。更新:与最初所说的相反,该机箱没有任何问题。
Christian Hintze, 👁 Christian Hintze (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Alder Lake Gaming Geforce

继去年的小规模更新之后,华硕今年选择了对其经济实惠的17英寸游戏笔记本电脑进行大修。其结果是一个新设计和更新的外壳,一个支持DDR5内存的英特尔Alder Lake CPU,以及总共四个GPU选项,包括我们审查单位的GTX 3060。

除了其直接的第11代前辈,我们的对比组中还包括一些17英寸游戏笔记本,包括 联想Legion 5 17,以及 MSI GE76 Raider(相同的CPU), 微星 微星Katana GF76(相同的GPU与11代CPU),以及 申克XMG核心17(第十代CPU)。

Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W (TUF Gaming F17 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-12700H 14 x 1.7 - 4.7 GHz, 111 W PL2 / Short Burst, 45 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-P
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU - 6144 MB, 140 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), Geforce 511.79, MUX Switch
Memory
16384 MB 
, 2x 8GB DDR5-4800 (2.400 MHz), up to 32 GB
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, AU Optronics B173HAN04.9 (AUO4B9D), IPS, glossy: no, 144 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N, 1024 GB 
, 865 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: Headset jack
Networking
Intel Ethernet Connection I219-LM (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 25 x 394 x 264
Battery
90 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 720P HD camera
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo Speakers, Keyboard: Chiclet RGB, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.515 kg, Power Supply: 725 g
Price
1750 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
84.1 %
04/2022
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg25 mm17.30"1920x1080
82.8 %
10/2021
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.7 kg26 mm17.30"1920x1080
85.2 %
02/2022
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
3.1 kg24.3 mm17.30"1920x1080
87.5 %
01/2022
MSI GE76 Raider
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3 kg26 mm17.30"1920x1080
80.4 %
09/2021
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.7 kg25.2 mm17.30"1920x1080
83.9 %
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg30.05 mm17.30"2560x1440

外壳 - 金属盖子,塑料底座

蒸汽朋克设计?
蒸汽朋克设计?
"物理 "缺口
"物理 "缺口
LED显示屏
LED显示屏

更新后的设计采用了与前代相似的颜色。之前非常突出的TUF标志已经被移除,取而代之的是金属显示盖中间一个小得多的突出印记。装饰有 "假螺丝 "的边角保持不变。

在顶部,我们发现一种突出的物理凹槽,容纳了摄像头和麦克风,作为打开显示盖的闩锁。没有办法只用一只手打开笔记本电脑;需要两只手。

在显示屏盖子关闭的情况下,一个小的星形LED面板显示笔记本电脑的当前状态,例如,它是否正在充电或是否已置于飞行模式。

打开显示盖后,可以发现另一个不同之处。底座由坚固的塑料制成,不再有 "时尚 "的梯度装饰,而是完全水平,因此是平的。相应地,键盘也不再凹进到顶部的机箱中。

风扇通风口不再沿着设备的整个宽度定位,而是变得更小,现在位于右侧。

说到厚度,华硕的官方规格为22.9毫米,这很有欺骗性。它的最薄处可能只有这么厚,但是它的50%以上的表面又被提高了2-3毫米,导致实际厚度接近25毫米。

就占地面积而言,新设计比前代产品略窄几毫米,而且能够减轻约200克(7盎司)的重量。

它的大多数(公认的旧)竞争对手都更大,除了稍薄但明显更重的联想Legion 。

尺寸比较

395.7 mm 260.8 mm 30.05 mm 2.5 kg399 mm 269 mm 26 mm 2.7 kg399 mm 290 mm 24.3 mm 3.1 kg398 mm 273 mm 25.2 mm 2.7 kg397 mm 284 mm 26 mm 3 kg394 mm 264 mm 25 mm 2.5 kg

连接性 - Thunderbolt 4;Wi-Fi不佳

端口与前代产品基本保持一致,除了一个USB-A端口变成了USB-C端口外,总共有两个USB-C端口,其中一个与雷电4控制器相连。

此外,鉴于后部两侧配备了额外的风扇通风口,所有的端口都稍微向前移动。右撇子会很高兴听到该设备的右侧只配备了一个USB端口,而左撇子可能会对这个定位提出异议。我们还发现该设备的耳机插孔离USB-A端口太近。否则,端口间距总体上还可以。

左边:电源、LAN、HDMI 2.0b、Thunderbolt 4、USB-C 3.2 Gen 2、USB-A 3.0、音频插孔
左边:电源、LAN、HDMI 2.0b、Thunderbolt 4、USB-C 3.2 Gen 2、USB-A 3.0、音频插孔
对。Kensington,USB-A 3.0
对。Kensington,USB-A 3.0
后方。风扇通风口
后方。风扇通风口

沟通

有线通信由CPU的集成控制器处理,该控制器在2015年首次推出。相应地,它只支持高达1 Gbps的速度。相比之下,许多现代网络控制器支持2.5Gbps或更高的速度。

无线通信是由非常常见的英特尔AX201适配器处理的。不幸的是,F17的执行速度特别慢,传输速度只有其竞争对手的一半左右。这在其前辈身上已经存在,我们很失望地看到它没有得到解决和改进。

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1541 (1418min - 1606max) MBit/s ∼100% +242%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1394 (758min - 1577max) MBit/s ∼90% +210%
MSI GE76 Raider
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1257 (650min - 1337max) MBit/s ∼82% +179%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1775, n=322)
1162 MBit/s ∼75% +158%
Average of class Gaming
  (450 - 1622, n=166, last 2 years)
1158 MBit/s ∼75% +157%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
892 (836min - 935max) MBit/s ∼58% +98%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
 
582 (312min - 680max) MBit/s ∼38% +29%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
450 (211min - 459max) MBit/s ∼29%
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1711 (861min - 1776max) MBit/s ∼100% +304%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1302 (718min - 1672max) MBit/s ∼76% +208%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (136 - 1743, n=322)
1261 MBit/s ∼74% +198%
Average of class Gaming
  (90 - 1743, n=166, last 2 years)
1232 MBit/s ∼72% +191%
MSI GE76 Raider
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1137 (588min - 1235max) MBit/s ∼66% +169%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
650 (595min - 706max) MBit/s ∼38% +54%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
 
569 (350min - 709max) MBit/s ∼33% +35%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
423 MBit/s ∼25%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750Tooltip
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12: Ø422 (403-429)
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø650 (595-706)
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1682 (861-1776)
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø441 (211-459)
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø892 (836-935)
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1541 (1418-1606)

网络摄像头

F17配备了一个普通的720p网络摄像头,色彩不佳,整体图像质量很差。

ColorChecker
14.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
21.7 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W: 16.32 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 23.26 ∆E

安全问题

F17有一个Kensington锁以及TPM 2.0。其他安全功能,例如指纹识别器,并不具备。

配件和保修

就F17的价格范围而言,除了一个240瓦的电源外,盒子里没有其他配件。

欧洲客户得到24个月的有限保修,而美国客户又一次只满足于12个月。

保修期将持续到2024年
保修期将持续到2024年

维护

三种不同的长度
三种不同的长度

底盖是由12个容易看到的十字螺丝固定的。不幸的是,它们有三种不同的长度,所以你需要跟踪哪颗螺丝的位置。

撬开底盖原来是一个相对简单的经验。卸下盖子后,你可以接触到风扇、电池、SSD和RAM。后两者由一个黑色塑料盖子保护,用胶带固定,此外,固态硬盘也被某种金属箔覆盖,以改善散热。另外还有一个M.2插槽,可供额外的固态硬盘使用。

拆除底板
拆除底板
2个填充的RAM插槽
2个填充的RAM插槽
SSD
SSD
次要的SSD插槽
次要的SSD插槽

与FX706相比,新机型在内部看起来很不一样。值得注意的是,它有额外的热管,更大的扬声器,重新定位的SSD等等。

目前的模式
目前的模式
前(前)任的继承人
前(前)任的继承人

输入设备--小键盘

键盘

键盘布局仍然大体相同,对于17英寸的笔记本来说,它的数字键盘非常窄。光标键仍然只有普通键的一半大小;上/下键占用一个普通键的空间。

新的是位于键盘上方左上方的四个额外的功能键,用于调高和调低音量、静音和启动Armory Crate软件。和以前一样,电源键在右上角是一个专门的独立实体,而作为游戏笔记本上常见的WASD键有一个独立的半透明的白色,与键盘的其他部分形成鲜明的对比。

键盘采用三段式RGB背光,不能对每个键进行自定义,只能对每个区域进行自定义。

键程仍然相对较短,反馈明显但比前代产品更柔和。总的来说,这款键盘的打字感觉非常舒适,噪音排放适中。

当前的键盘
当前的键盘
前(前)任的继承人
前(前)任的继承人
专用的电源按钮
专用的电源按钮
WASD键
WASD键

触摸板

触摸板
触摸板

触摸板不再有专门的按钮,但现在比以前大一些(约13 x 7.7厘米/5.1 x 3英寸)。它的表面是令人愉快的光滑,只有在非常缓慢的移动中才会有轻微的粘性。我们还发现在右下角有一个小死角。

集成的按钮工作正常,没有任何问题,并且有适度的噪音排放。

显示屏 - 昏暗,并非真正为游戏而设

哑光子像素阵列
哑光子像素阵列
可见的背光灯出血
可见的背光灯出血

华硕唯一的显示屏是由友达光电生产的FHD IPS 144 Hz面板。

该面板是众所周知的,并且已经存在了相当长的一段时间,鉴于其低亮度只有268尼特,30-40毫秒的缓慢响应时间,以及60%的sRGB和大约41%的AdobeRGB的色彩空间覆盖率,我们已经习惯于看到它被用于更实惠的笔记本电脑,如微星GF75薄。

从正面看,由于整体亮度低,它的黑色水平相当低,使其对比度相对较高。光照度为89%,还算不错。

虽然该面板没有受到PWM闪烁的影响,但它确实受到了轻微但仍然明显的背光出血的影响,沿着其边缘。

59.7%的sRGB
59.7%的sRGB
41.5%的AdobeRGB
41.5%的AdobeRGB
261
cd/m²
256
cd/m²
271
cd/m²
270
cd/m²
287
cd/m²
268
cd/m²
263
cd/m²
277
cd/m²
260
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AU Optronics B173HAN04.9 (AUO4B9D)
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 287 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 268.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Contrast: 1688:1 (Black: 0.17 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.1 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4, calibrated: 5.1
ΔE Greyscale 4.24 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
41.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.44
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
AU Optronics B173HAN04.9 (AUO4B9D), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
AU Optronics AUI8294 (B173HAN04.9), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
LEN173FHD, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
MSI GE76 Raider
AU Optronics B173HAN05.4 (AUOE295), IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 17.30
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
AU Optronics B173HAN04.9, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
BOE CQ NE173QHM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30
Display
0%
62%
57%
-1%
67%
Display P3 Coverage
40.2
40.1
0%
64.8
61%
63.1
57%
39.8
-1%
68.1
69%
sRGB Coverage
59.7
60
1%
97.2
63%
94
57%
59.5
0%
98.5
65%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
41.5
41.4
0%
66.7
61%
65.2
57%
41.12
-1%
69.3
67%
Response Times
21%
66%
77%
9%
62%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
39.2 ?(18.2, 21)
32.4
17%
15 ?(7, 8)
62%
5.6 ?(2, 3.6)
86%
36.8 ?(17.2, 19.6)
6%
16.8 ?(8.4, 8.4)
57%
Response Time Black / White *
29.6 ?(15.4, 14.2)
22.4
24%
9 ?(5, 4)
70%
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
68%
26 ?(13.6, 12.4)
12%
10 ?(4.8, 5.2)
66%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-5%
21%
24%
-15%
4%
Brightness middle
287
266
-7%
323
13%
290
1%
260
-9%
370
29%
Brightness
268
264
-1%
305
14%
290
8%
251
-6%
333
24%
Brightness Distribution
89
79
-11%
89
0%
96
8%
85
-4%
84
-6%
Black Level *
0.17
0.32
-88%
0.25
-47%
0.23
-35%
0.26
-53%
0.38
-124%
Contrast
1688
831
-51%
1292
-23%
1261
-25%
1000
-41%
974
-42%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.1
3.97
22%
1.87
63%
1.59
69%
3.9
24%
2.41
53%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.72
8.93
-2%
4.84
44%
3.17
64%
20.64
-137%
7.32
16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
5.1
3.5
31%
0.92
82%
0.87
83%
3.71
27%
1.19
77%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.24
1.8
58%
2.57
39%
2.5
41%
1.6
62%
3.9
8%
Gamma
2.44 90%
2.31 95%
2.42 91%
2.253 98%
2.068 106%
2.287 96%
CCT
6008 108%
6754 96%
7012 93%
6640 98%
6511 100%
7302 89%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
41.4
69
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
60
93
Total Average (Program / Settings)
5% / -1%
50% / 36%
53% / 39%
-2% / -9%
44% / 26%

* ... smaller is better

手动校准显示面板几乎没有改善其图像质量。虽然灰度精度略有提高,但我们发现色彩精度根本没有改善。

灰度
灰度
饱和度
饱和度
颜色检测器
颜色检测器
灰度标定
灰度标定
饱和度校验
饱和度校验
校准的ColorChecker
校准的ColorChecker

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15.4 ms rise
↘ 14.2 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 72 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (23.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
39.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.2 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (37 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21940 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

由于亮度低,户外使用性非常有限。图像太暗,在明亮的环境中根本无法阅读和使用。

对于IPS面板,我们发现友达光电的面板提供了相对较差的可视角度,在极端角度下亮度明显下降,使这个已经很暗的显示屏更加暗淡,更无法使用。

性能 - 最大的3D性能

搭配了 英特尔酷睿i7-12700HNvidia Geforce RTX 3060与16GB的DDR5内存搭配,应该足够强大,可以完成所有的任务和挑战,包括现代游戏,除了可能有一些例外,应该在原生FHD分辨率下以最大的细节完美流畅地运行。

虽然所有SKU的处理器都是相同的,但GPU却不是,华硕提供了四种不同的GPU选择。RTX 3050、RTX 3050 Ti、RTX 3060和RTX 3070。

 

测试条件

为了达到可能的最佳效果,我们通过随附的Armory Crate软件将性能配置文件设置为 "涡轮"。

鉴于许多选项只能使用华硕自己的软件进行配置,用户基本上没有选择,只能使用它。请记住,一些制造商使用他们的软件来收集用户活动数据。

军械库板条箱
军械库板条箱

处理器

在第1次和第2次运行期间,从111瓦到45瓦
在第1次和第2次运行期间,从111瓦到45瓦
从第3次运行开始,从79到45W,再到以后
从第3次运行开始,从79到45W,再到以后

ǞǞǞ 英特尔酷睿i7-12700H是英特尔目前Alder Lake家族的成员,总共有14个内核(6个P核,8个E核),共有20个线程。其集成的英特尔Xe图形处理器具有96个EUs,运行速度高达1.4GHz。

在我们30分钟的CineBench循环中,我们的i7-12700H开始时的水平与微星GE76 Raider的Core i9-12900HK相当,但随后迅速下降到更适合上一代的i9-11900H的水平。这在看CPU的TDP时变得非常明显。在前两次运行中,CPU的功耗在几秒钟内达到111W的峰值,然后降低到45W。从第三次迭代开始,峰值被记录为更低的75-80W,然后迅速降低到只有45W。

换句话说:短期爆发性能比前代产品快30%左右,而长期持续性能却没有。

在电池方面,性能从2820点(第一次运行)和1925点(第二次运行及以后)下降到只有1768点。这种性能下降是明显的,但仍然相对较小。

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

01503004506007509001050120013501500165018001950210022502400255027002850Tooltip
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø1955 (1902.5-2820.28)
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM Intel Core i9-11900H: Ø1874 (1698.44-2029.22)
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø2722 (2660.99-2908.88)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | 64 Bit Single-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
87.5 pt ∼88%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
 
75.3 pt ∼75%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
70.7 pt ∼71%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
64.9 pt ∼65%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
60.4 pt ∼60%
Average of class Gaming
 
59.1 pt ∼59%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
56.7 pt ∼57%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
49.3 pt ∼49%
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Multi Core)
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
18288 Points ∼100% +31%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (4032 - 19250, n=16)
15880 Points ∼87% +14%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
13934 Points ∼76%
Average of class Gaming
  (4032 - 19282, n=155, last 2 years)
12045 Points ∼66% -14%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
11567 Points ∼63% -17%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
11080 Points ∼61% -20%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
10416 Points ∼57% -25%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
8408 Points ∼46% -40%
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Single Core)
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1909 Points ∼100% +7%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
1790 Points ∼94%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (778 - 1825, n=15)
1723 Points ∼90% -4%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
1574 Points ∼82% -12%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
1497 Points ∼78% -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (778 - 1920, n=154, last 2 years)
1470 Points ∼77% -18%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
1366 Points ∼72% -24%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
1225 Points ∼64% -32%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
6849 Points ∼100% +42%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1576 - 7382, n=16)
5962 Points ∼87% +24%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
4808 Points ∼70%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
4403 Points ∼64% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (1397 - 7382, n=227, last 2 years)
4273 Points ∼62% -11%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
4214 Points ∼62% -12%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
4059 Points ∼59% -16%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
3244 Points ∼47% -33%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
734 Points ∼100% +7%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
689 Points ∼94%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (300 - 702, n=16)
667 Points ∼91% -3%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
600 Points ∼82% -13%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
579 Points ∼79% -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (300 - 736, n=227, last 2 years)
542 Points ∼74% -21%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
535 Points ∼73% -22%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
476 Points ∼65% -31%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
2909 (2660.99min - 2908.88max) Points ∼100% +3%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
2820 (1902.5min - 2820.28max) Points ∼97%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1379 - 2903, n=16)
2592 Points ∼89% -8%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
2029 Points ∼70% -28%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
1823 (1645.14min - 1822.57max) Points ∼63% -35%
Average of class Gaming
  (536 - 2944, n=239, last 2 years)
1797 Points ∼62% -36%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
1723 Points ∼59% -39%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
1382 Points ∼48% -51%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
275 Points ∼100% +7%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
257 Points ∼93%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (113 - 263, n=16)
250 Points ∼91% -3%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
241 Points ∼88% -6%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
226 Points ∼82% -12%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
223 Points ∼81% -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (108 - 277, n=229, last 2 years)
217 Points ∼79% -16%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
196 Points ∼71% -24%
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
326 Seconds * ∼100% -32%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
299.7 Seconds * ∼92% -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (168 - 732, n=226, last 2 years)
295 Seconds * ∼90% -19%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
284 Seconds * ∼87% -15%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
247 Seconds * ∼76%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (171 - 732, n=15)
245 Seconds * ∼75% +1%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
242 Seconds * ∼74% +2%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
181 Seconds * ∼56% +27%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
72836 MIPS ∼100% +32%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (22844 - 73067, n=15)
61120 MIPS ∼84% +11%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
55010 MIPS ∼76%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
50441 MIPS ∼69% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (21148 - 76063, n=226, last 2 years)
48605 MIPS ∼67% -12%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
45428 MIPS ∼62% -17%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
45311 MIPS ∼62% -18%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
40876 MIPS ∼56% -26%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
6144 MIPS ∼100% +10%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
5870 MIPS ∼96% +5%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
5588 MIPS ∼91%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
5511 MIPS ∼90% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (2743 - 5863, n=15)
5507 MIPS ∼90% -1%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
5393 MIPS ∼88% -3%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
5369 MIPS ∼87% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (2743 - 6506, n=226, last 2 years)
5361 MIPS ∼87% -4%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
13648 Points ∼100% +8%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
12661 Points ∼93%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (5144 - 13745, n=16)
12013 Points ∼88% -5%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
8470 Points ∼62% -33%
Average of class Gaming
  (2783 - 14294, n=219, last 2 years)
8162 Points ∼60% -36%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
7725 Points ∼57% -39%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
6688 Points ∼49% -47%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
6641 Points ∼49% -48%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1918 Points ∼100% +9%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
1756 Points ∼92%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (803 - 1851, n=16)
1712 Points ∼89% -3%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
1576 Points ∼82% -10%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
1568 Points ∼82% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (703 - 1918, n=219, last 2 years)
1421 Points ∼74% -19%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
1417 Points ∼74% -19%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
1264 Points ∼66% -28%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
19.9 fps ∼100% +41%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (4.67 - 21.4, n=15)
16.9 fps ∼85% +20%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
14.9 fps ∼75% +6%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
14.1 fps ∼71%
Average of class Gaming
  (4.67 - 22, n=225, last 2 years)
13.5 fps ∼68% -4%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
13.3 fps ∼67% -6%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
13.2 fps ∼66% -6%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
11.1 fps ∼56% -21%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
86.1 s * ∼100%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
56.1 s * ∼65% +35%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
53.3 s * ∼62% +38%
Average of class Gaming
  (23.9 - 113, n=223, last 2 years)
52.9 s * ∼61% +39%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
49.2 s * ∼57% +43%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (34.2 - 92, n=15)
47.7 s * ∼55% +45%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
45.8 s * ∼53% +47%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
38.9 s * ∼45% +55%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
0.577 sec * ∼100% -25%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.559 sec * ∼97% -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.4218 - 1.088, n=222, last 2 years)
0.556 sec * ∼96% -21%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
0.533 sec * ∼92% -16%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
0.529 sec * ∼92% -15%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (0.448 - 1.052, n=15)
0.4953 sec * ∼86% -7%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4614 sec * ∼80%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
0.4252 sec * ∼74% +8%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2820 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
257 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
194 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Help
Performance Rating
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
86.1 pt ∼86%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
84.5 pt ∼85%
Average of class Gaming
 
81.1 pt ∼81%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
 
75.2 pt ∼75%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
66.7 pt ∼67%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
65.1 pt ∼65%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM -9!
Intel Core i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
0 pt ∼0%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE -9!
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
0 pt ∼0%
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
12636 KRay/s ∼100% +86%
Average of class Gaming
  (2585 - 19199, n=180, last 2 years)
11544 KRay/s ∼91% +70%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
10072 KRay/s ∼80% +48%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9065 KRay/s ∼72% +33%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (2585 - 9576, n=15)
7939 KRay/s ∼63% +17%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
6797 KRay/s ∼54%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
78250 Points ∼100% +142%
Average of class Gaming
  (12439 - 110797, n=180, last 2 years)
62775 Points ∼80% +94%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
52336 Points ∼67% +62%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40570 Points ∼52% +25%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (12439 - 41732, n=15)
36423 Points ∼47% +12%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
32381 Points ∼41%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3178 MB/s ∼100% +36%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (833 - 3442, n=15)
2820 MB/s ∼89% +21%
Average of class Gaming
  (833 - 4851, n=180, last 2 years)
2805 MB/s ∼88% +20%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2675 MB/s ∼84% +15%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2543 MB/s ∼80% +9%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2331 MB/s ∼73%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
106414 Points ∼100% +7%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
99296 Points ∼93%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (57923 - 99861, n=15)
95321 Points ∼90% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (30447 - 132615, n=180, last 2 years)
88751 Points ∼83% -11%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
76986 Points ∼72% -22%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
72108 Points ∼68% -27%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
10237 Points ∼100% +23%
Average of class Gaming
  (3007 - 17639, n=180, last 2 years)
9921 Points ∼97% +19%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
9157 Points ∼89% +10%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (3249 - 9928, n=15)
8997 Points ∼88% +8%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
8862 Points ∼87% +7%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
8317 Points ∼81%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
43274 Points ∼100% +129%
Average of class Gaming
  (7135 - 61370, n=180, last 2 years)
33892 Points ∼78% +80%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
25823 Points ∼60% +37%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
24693 Points ∼57% +31%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (7135 - 27081, n=15)
21847 Points ∼50% +16%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
18863 Points ∼44%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
100062 MB/s ∼100% +102%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
98939 MB/s ∼99% +100%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (31839 - 102398, n=15)
81537 MB/s ∼81% +65%
Average of class Gaming
  (11368 - 156370, n=180, last 2 years)
74705 MB/s ∼75% +51%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
49493 MB/s ∼49%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
34383 MB/s ∼34% -31%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
1085 MB/s ∼100% +38%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (305 - 1164, n=15)
972 MB/s ∼90% +24%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
787 MB/s ∼73%
Average of class Gaming
  (305 - 1209, n=201, last 2 years)
668 MB/s ∼62% -15%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
649 MB/s ∼60% -18%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
609 MB/s ∼56% -23%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
0 MB/s ∼0% -100%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
0 MB/s ∼0% -100%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
6505 KRay/s ∼100% +66%
Average of class Gaming
  (1437 - 10472, n=180, last 2 years)
6253 KRay/s ∼96% +60%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
5481 KRay/s ∼84% +40%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
5239 KRay/s ∼81% +34%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1437 - 5742, n=15)
4597 KRay/s ∼71% +17%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
3917 KRay/s ∼60%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40000 MPixel/s ∼100% +22%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (22254 - 46643, n=15)
33750 MPixel/s ∼84% +3%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
32915 MPixel/s ∼82%
Average of class Gaming
  (8341 - 46643, n=180, last 2 years)
24077 MPixel/s ∼60% -27%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
20568 MPixel/s ∼51% -38%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
16101 MPixel/s ∼40% -51%

系统性能

在PCMark 10中,F17的表现比我们预期的要差得多,比同类系统的平均水平低6-15%。它只在数字内容创作中能够超过自己的前辈,但总体上表现得更慢。我们能够通过第二次运行测试来重现这些结果。

从主观上讲,该系统表现得非常平稳,没有任何明显的打嗝现象。

PCMark 10 / Score
MSI GE76 Raider
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8007 Points ∼100% +34%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
6901 Points ∼86% +15%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (5986 - 7426, n=3)
6861 Points ∼86% +15%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU
6615 Points ∼83% +11%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
6505 Points ∼81% +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (4077 - 8186, n=191, last 2 years)
6416 Points ∼80% +7%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
5986 Points ∼75%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
5685 Points ∼71% -5%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
MSI GE76 Raider
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10688 Points ∼100% +15%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
10602 Points ∼99% +14%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (9289 - 10499, n=3)
10027 Points ∼94% +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (7148 - 11205, n=190, last 2 years)
9797 Points ∼92% +5%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
9695 Points ∼91% +4%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU
9639 Points ∼90% +4%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9289 Points ∼87%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
9182 Points ∼86% -1%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
MSI GE76 Raider
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10100 Points ∼100% +64%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9071 Points ∼90% +47%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU
9027 Points ∼89% +47%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
8874 Points ∼88% +44%
Average of class Gaming
  (6161 - 10638, n=190, last 2 years)
8614 Points ∼85% +40%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (6161 - 9602, n=3)
8278 Points ∼82% +34%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
7217 Points ∼71% +17%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
6161 Points ∼61%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
MSI GE76 Raider
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
12905 Points ∼100% +27%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (10118 - 11672, n=3)
10655 Points ∼83% +5%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
10175 Points ∼79%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9274 Points ∼72% -9%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU
9026 Points ∼70% -11%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
8684 Points ∼67% -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (3670 - 13098, n=190, last 2 years)
8629 Points ∼67% -15%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
7526 Points ∼58% -26%
CrossMark / Overall
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (1649 - 1910, n=2)
1780 Points ∼100% +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (974 - 2108, n=23, last 2 years)
1701 Points ∼96% +3%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1649 Points ∼93%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU
1337 Points ∼75% -19%
CrossMark / Productivity
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (1536 - 1797, n=2)
1667 Points ∼100% +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (907 - 2062, n=23, last 2 years)
1658 Points ∼99% +8%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1536 Points ∼92%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU
1370 Points ∼82% -11%
CrossMark / Creativity
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (1963 - 2072, n=2)
2018 Points ∼100% +3%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1963 Points ∼97%
Average of class Gaming
  (1027 - 2165, n=23, last 2 years)
1771 Points ∼88% -10%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU
1372 Points ∼68% -30%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 2230, n=23, last 2 years)
1647 Points ∼100% +36%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (1210 - 1798, n=2)
1504 Points ∼91% +24%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1210 Points ∼73%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU
1148 Points ∼70% -5%
PCMark 10 Score
5986 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
62554 MB/s ∼100% +18%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (43855 - 77803, n=15)
55799 MB/s ∼89% +5%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
52925 MB/s ∼85%
Average of class Gaming
  (18074 - 77803, n=180, last 2 years)
41939 MB/s ∼67% -21%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
38867 MB/s ∼62% -27%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
36548 MB/s ∼58% -31%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65452 MB/s ∼100% +4%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
62745 MB/s ∼96%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (45897 - 76185, n=15)
58908 MB/s ∼90% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (20318 - 76185, n=180, last 2 years)
45768 MB/s ∼70% -27%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
44282 MB/s ∼68% -29%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
40016 MB/s ∼61% -36%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
64282 MB/s ∼100% +11%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
57728 MB/s ∼90%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (42088 - 66256, n=15)
55885 MB/s ∼87% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (15975 - 66256, n=180, last 2 years)
44175 MB/s ∼69% -23%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
40678 MB/s ∼63% -30%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
36998 MB/s ∼58% -36%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
92.6 ns * ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (90.1 - 122, n=15)
78.7 ns * ∼85%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
78.5 ns * ∼85%
Average of class Gaming
  (78.1 - 122, n=202, last 2 years)
62.4 ns * ∼67%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
56.6 ns * ∼61%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
0 ns * ∼0%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
0 ns * ∼0%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
0 ns * ∼0%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

不幸的是,我们在启动Edge浏览器时已经发现了明显的DPC延迟。积极的一面是,从那时起,无论我们进行什么测试,这些都没有变得更糟。这意味着我们的4K/60 FPS YouTube视频测试运行得不是很好,总共有14个丢帧。我们对这种行为的主要怀疑是NT的内核驱动。

YouTube测试视频
YouTube测试视频
LatencyMon主页
LatencyMon主页
LatencyMon 驱动程序
LatencyMon 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
4527 μs * ∼100% -95%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2319 μs * ∼51%
MSI GE76 Raider
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1642 μs * ∼36% +29%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU
1564 μs * ∼35% +33%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1399 μs * ∼31% +40%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
743 μs * ∼16% +68%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

我们的评测单元配备了1TB SK Hynix PCIe 3 SSD,它在我们的SSD/HDD排行榜上排在第44位。 SSD/HDD排行榜的第44位.同样的SSD已经安装在F17的前身中。它总体表现良好,但无法跟上XMG Core或MSI Raider中的三星固态硬盘。

持续的读取性能原来是相当不稳定的,并在短时间内出现波动。这可能是其总体上低于PCMark平均性能的原因之一。

SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3364 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3042 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 514 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 445.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 25.64 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 213.9 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 1665 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 2024 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
94.7 pt ∼95%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
61.9 pt ∼62%
Average of class Gaming
 
56.7 pt ∼57%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
56.5 pt ∼57%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
55.9 pt ∼56%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
 
54.7 pt ∼55%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU
44 pt ∼44%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
25.7 pt ∼26%
DiskSpd
seq read
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2529 (2450.31min - 2528.54max) MB/s ∼100% +42%
Average of class Gaming
  (170 - 4931, n=189, last 2 years)
2249 MB/s ∼89% +26%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2183 (2113.09min - 2182.51max) MB/s ∼86% +23%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
2144 (2055.42min - 2144.01max) MB/s ∼85% +20%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
  (1780 - 2383, n=17)
2063 MB/s ∼82% +16%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU
1956 (1938.61min - 1956.43max) MB/s ∼77% +10%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1780 (1752.32min - 1780.06max) MB/s ∼70%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1780 (1752.32min - 1780.06max) MB/s ∼70% 0%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
1061 (106.95min - 1061.13max) MB/s ∼42% -40%
seq write
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3923 (3818.83min - 3922.64max) MB/s ∼100% +48%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2643 (2559.24min - 2642.87max) MB/s ∼67%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2643 (2559.24min - 2642.87max) MB/s ∼67% 0%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
2425 (2355.41min - 2424.54max) MB/s ∼62% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (174 - 7889, n=188, last 2 years)
2416 MB/s ∼62% -9%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
  (1886 - 2909, n=17)
2362 MB/s ∼60% -11%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2095 (2074.34min - 2094.85max) MB/s ∼53% -21%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU
1604 (1586.29min - 1604.11max) MB/s ∼41% -39%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
978 (971.82min - 978.46max) MB/s ∼25% -63%
seq q8 t1 read
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
6722 (5765.49min - 6722max) MB/s ∼100% +91%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 13195, n=189, last 2 years)
3650 MB/s ∼54% +4%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
  (3515 - 3607, n=17)
3566 MB/s ∼53% +1%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
3542 (3289.1min - 3542.3max) MB/s ∼53% +1%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
3515 (2963.07min - 3514.83max) MB/s ∼52%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
3515 (2963.07min - 3514.83max) MB/s ∼52% 0%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
3468 (3143.21min - 3467.64max) MB/s ∼52% -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU
2646 (2421.6min - 2645.77max) MB/s ∼39% -25%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
1985 (1757.88min - 1984.76max) MB/s ∼30% -44%
seq q8 t1 write
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4999 (4978.75min - 4998.98max) MB/s ∼100% +66%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
3302 (3294.84min - 3301.55max) MB/s ∼66% +10%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
3091 (2656.88min - 3090.57max) MB/s ∼62% +3%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
  (2869 - 3098, n=17)
3016 MB/s ∼60% 0%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
3012 (2669.05min - 3012.29max) MB/s ∼60%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
3012 (2669.05min - 3012.29max) MB/s ∼60% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (86.2 - 9830, n=189, last 2 years)
2891 MB/s ∼58% -4%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU
1597 (1579.16min - 1597.4max) MB/s ∼32% -47%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
979 (974.28min - 979.37max) MB/s ∼20% -67%
4k q1 t1 read
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
89.8 (89.42min - 89.75max) MB/s ∼100% +175%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
68.6 (68.41min - 68.6max) MB/s ∼76% +110%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
  (32.6 - 70.5, n=17)
56.5 MB/s ∼63% +73%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.53 - 97.4, n=189, last 2 years)
54.6 MB/s ∼61% +67%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU
47.4 (47.27min - 47.41max) MB/s ∼53% +45%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
47.3 (42.61min - 47.31max) MB/s ∼53% +45%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
32.6 (30.94min - 32.64max) MB/s ∼36%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
32.6 (30.94min - 32.64max) MB/s ∼36% 0%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
32.4 (32.28min - 32.44max) MB/s ∼36% -1%
4k q1 t1 write
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
275 (273.95min - 275.11max) MB/s ∼100% +27%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
216 (185.22min - 215.93max) MB/s ∼79%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
216 (185.22min - 215.93max) MB/s ∼79% 0%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
173 (172.14min - 172.83max) MB/s ∼63% -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.79 - 421, n=188, last 2 years)
165.7 MB/s ∼60% -23%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
  (81.2 - 216, n=17)
154.7 MB/s ∼56% -28%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU
144 (143.24min - 143.97max) MB/s ∼52% -33%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
136 (136.06min - 136.26max) MB/s ∼49% -37%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
112 (108.3min - 111.94max) MB/s ∼41% -48%
4k q32 t16 read
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4073 (4064.94min - 4073.47max) MB/s ∼100% +84%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2214 (2192.88min - 2214.37max) MB/s ∼54%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2214 (2192.88min - 2214.37max) MB/s ∼54% 0%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
1888 (1886.26min - 1887.59max) MB/s ∼46% -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.1 - 4198, n=188, last 2 years)
1693 MB/s ∼42% -24%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
  (692 - 2217, n=17)
1378 MB/s ∼34% -38%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU
1079 (1063.35min - 1079.33max) MB/s ∼26% -51%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
751 (741.76min - 751.2max) MB/s ∼18% -66%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
310 (293.77min - 309.72max) MB/s ∼8% -86%
4k q32 t16 write
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
2668 (2644.15min - 2667.88max) MB/s ∼100% +16%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2307 (2258.85min - 2307.29max) MB/s ∼86%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2307 (2258.85min - 2307.29max) MB/s ∼86% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.15 - 4249, n=188, last 2 years)
1700 MB/s ∼64% -26%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU
1200 (1178.03min - 1199.78max) MB/s ∼45% -48%
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1066 (1060.72min - 1066.17max) MB/s ∼40% -54%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
976 (973.27min - 976.25max) MB/s ∼37% -58%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
  (394 - 2341, n=17)
911 MB/s ∼34% -61%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
429 (419.23min - 429.09max) MB/s ∼16% -81%
AS SSD
Score Total
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8982 Points ∼100% +63%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
5520 Points ∼61% 0%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
5514 Points ∼61%
Average of class Gaming
  (910 - 9279, n=182, last 2 years)
4988 Points ∼56% -10%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
  (3615 - 6117, n=14)
4839 Points ∼54% -12%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
4695 Points ∼52% -15%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU
3055 Points ∼34% -45%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
1816 Points ∼20% -67%
Score Read
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3344 Points ∼100% +58%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2121 Points ∼63%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
2005 Points ∼60% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (389 - 3587, n=182, last 2 years)
1859 Points ∼56% -12%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
  (1330 - 2291, n=14)
1740 Points ∼52% -18%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1666 Points ∼50% -21%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU
1274 Points ∼38% -40%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
649 Points ∼19% -69%
Score Write
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3997 Points ∼100% +72%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
2488 Points ∼62% +7%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2324 Points ∼58%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
  (1638 - 2660, n=14)
2248 Points ∼56% -3%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2232 Points ∼56% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (335 - 4414, n=182, last 2 years)
2193 Points ∼55% -6%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU
1190 Points ∼30% -49%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
872 Points ∼22% -62%
Seq Read
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5120 MB/s ∼100% +93%
Average of class Gaming
  (252 - 6562, n=182, last 2 years)
3004 MB/s ∼59% +13%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
2876 MB/s ∼56% +8%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2837 MB/s ∼55% +7%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
  (2635 - 3133, n=14)
2834 MB/s ∼55% +7%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU
2725 MB/s ∼53% +3%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2656 MB/s ∼52%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
1704 MB/s ∼33% -36%
Seq Write
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3692 MB/s ∼100% +46%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
2803 MB/s ∼76% +11%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2535 MB/s ∼69%
Average of class Gaming
  (308 - 7663, n=182, last 2 years)
2360 MB/s ∼64% -7%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
  (1243 - 2969, n=14)
1919 MB/s ∼52% -24%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1565 MB/s ∼42% -38%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU
1364 MB/s ∼37% -46%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
716 MB/s ∼19% -72%
4K Read
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
82.8 MB/s ∼100% +187%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
55.4 MB/s ∼67% +92%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
55.3 MB/s ∼67% +92%
Average of class Gaming
  (20 - 108, n=182, last 2 years)
54 MB/s ∼65% +87%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
  (28.8 - 66.9, n=14)
52.7 MB/s ∼64% +83%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU
45.38 MB/s ∼55% +57%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
37.77 MB/s ∼46% +31%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
28.83 MB/s ∼35%
4K Write
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
241.3 MB/s ∼100% +309%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
152.9 MB/s ∼63% +159%
Average of class Gaming
  (18 - 364, n=182, last 2 years)
146.1 MB/s ∼61% +148%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU
132.4 MB/s ∼55% +124%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
  (59 - 184.8, n=14)
126.8 MB/s ∼53% +115%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
106.9 MB/s ∼44% +81%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
66 MB/s ∼27% +12%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
59 MB/s ∼24%
4K-64 Read
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2749 MB/s ∼100% +50%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1827 MB/s ∼66%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
1662 MB/s ∼60% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (216 - 2959, n=182, last 2 years)
1505 MB/s ∼55% -18%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
  (1011 - 1923, n=14)
1404 MB/s ∼51% -23%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1327 MB/s ∼48% -27%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU
956 MB/s ∼35% -48%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
441.2 MB/s ∼16% -76%
4K-64 Write
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3387 MB/s ∼100% +68%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
2101 MB/s ∼62% +4%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2011 MB/s ∼59%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
  (1342 - 2216, n=14)