华硕TUF游戏F17笔记本评测。良好的3D性能和电池寿命满足了暗淡的显示屏

最大的性能。 两年后，华硕终于更新了该系列的机箱，并增加了桤木湖CPU与DDR5内存和RTX GPU，在我们的案例中是RTX 3060与完整的140 W TGP。虽然这听起来很有希望，但我们需要记住，不是所有的闪光点都是金子，TUF Gaming F17有一些缺陷，我们在审查中发现了这些缺陷。更新：与最初所说的相反，该机箱没有任何问题。

Christian Hintze, 👁 Christian Hintze (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 04/19/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Alder Lake Gaming Geforce

继去年的小规模更新之后，华硕今年选择了对其经济实惠的17英寸游戏笔记本电脑进行大修。其结果是一个新设计和更新的外壳，一个支持DDR5内存的英特尔Alder Lake CPU，以及总共四个GPU选项，包括我们审查单位的GTX 3060。

除了其直接的第11代前辈，我们的对比组中还包括一些17英寸游戏笔记本，包括联想Legion 5 17，以及 MSI GE76 Raider(相同的CPU), 微星微星Katana GF76(相同的GPU与11代CPU)，以及申克XMG核心17(第十代CPU)。

Test device courtesy of Cyberport

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W (TUF Gaming F17 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i7-12700H 14 x 1.7 - 4.7 GHz, 111 W PL2 / Short Burst, 45 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-P

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU - 6 GB VRAM, 140 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), Geforce 511.79, MUX Switch

Memory

16 GB

, 2x 8GB DDR5-4800 (2.400 MHz), up to 32 GB

Display

17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, AU Optronics B173HAN04.9 (AUO4B9D), IPS, glossy: no, 144 Hz

Mainboard

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH

Storage

SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N, 1024 GB

, 865 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Connections

2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: Headset jack

Networking

Intel Ethernet Connection I219-LM (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth Bluetooth 5.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 25 x 394 x 264

Battery

90 Wh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: 720P HD camera
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo Speakers, Keyboard: Chiclet RGB, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

2.515 kg, Power Supply: 725 g

Price

1750 Euro

Links

Asus homepage
Asus notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
84.1 %	04/2022	Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	2.5 kg	25 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
82.8 %	10/2021	Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	2.7 kg	26 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
85.2 %	02/2022	Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	3.1 kg	24.3 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
87.5 %	01/2022	MSI GE76 Raider i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	3 kg	26 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
80.4 %	09/2021	MSI Katana GF76 11UE i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	2.7 kg	25.2 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
83.9 %		Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	2.5 kg	30.05 mm	17.30"	2560x1440

外壳 - 金属盖子，塑料底座

更新后的设计采用了与前代相似的颜色。之前非常突出的TUF标志已经被移除，取而代之的是金属显示盖中间一个小得多的突出印记。装饰有 "假螺丝 "的边角保持不变。

在顶部，我们发现一种突出的物理凹槽，容纳了摄像头和麦克风，作为打开显示盖的闩锁。没有办法只用一只手打开笔记本电脑；需要两只手。

在显示屏盖子关闭的情况下，一个小的星形LED面板显示笔记本电脑的当前状态，例如，它是否正在充电或是否已置于飞行模式。

打开显示盖后，可以发现另一个不同之处。底座由坚固的塑料制成，不再有 "时尚 "的梯度装饰，而是完全水平，因此是平的。相应地，键盘也不再凹进到顶部的机箱中。

风扇通风口不再沿着设备的整个宽度定位，而是变得更小，现在位于右侧。

说到厚度，华硕的官方规格为22.9毫米，这很有欺骗性。它的最薄处可能只有这么厚，但是它的50%以上的表面又被提高了2-3毫米，导致实际厚度接近25毫米。

就占地面积而言，新设计比前代产品略窄几毫米，而且能够减轻约200克（7盎司）的重量。

它的大多数（公认的旧）竞争对手都更大，除了稍薄但明显更重的联想Legion 。

尺寸比较

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE MSI Katana GF76 11UE MSI GE76 Raider Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W DIN A4 ❌

连接性 - Thunderbolt 4；Wi-Fi不佳

端口与前代产品基本保持一致，除了一个USB-A端口变成了USB-C端口外，总共有两个USB-C端口，其中一个与雷电4控制器相连。

此外，鉴于后部两侧配备了额外的风扇通风口，所有的端口都稍微向前移动。右撇子会很高兴听到该设备的右侧只配备了一个USB端口，而左撇子可能会对这个定位提出异议。我们还发现该设备的耳机插孔离USB-A端口太近。否则，端口间距总体上还可以。

左边：电源、LAN、HDMI 2.0b、Thunderbolt 4、USB-C 3.2 Gen 2、USB-A 3.0、音频插孔

沟通

有线通信由CPU的集成控制器处理，该控制器在2015年首次推出。相应地，它只支持高达1 Gbps的速度。相比之下，许多现代网络控制器支持2.5Gbps或更高的速度。

无线通信是由非常常见的英特尔AX201适配器处理的。不幸的是，F17的执行速度特别慢，传输速度只有其竞争对手的一半左右。这在其前辈身上已经存在，我们很失望地看到它没有得到解决和改进。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1541 (1418^min - 1606^max) MBit/s ∼100% +242%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1394 (758^min - 1577^max) MBit/s ∼90% +210%
MSI GE76 Raider Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1257 (650^min - 1337^max) MBit/s ∼82% +179%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (49.8 - 1775, n=324)	1161 MBit/s ∼75% +158%
Average of class Gaming (450 - 1580, n=71, last 2 years)	1132 MBit/s ∼73% +152%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE	892 (836^min - 935^max) MBit/s ∼58% +98%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM	582 (312^min - 680^max) MBit/s ∼38% +29%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	450 (211^min - 459^max) MBit/s ∼29%
iperf3 receive AX12
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1711 (861^min - 1776^max) MBit/s ∼100% +304%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1302 (718^min - 1672^max) MBit/s ∼76% +208%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (136 - 1743, n=324)	1261 MBit/s ∼74% +198%
Average of class Gaming (90 - 1700, n=71, last 2 years)	1177 MBit/s ∼69% +178%
MSI GE76 Raider Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1137 (588^min - 1235^max) MBit/s ∼66% +169%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE	650 (595^min - 706^max) MBit/s ∼38% +54%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM	569 (350^min - 709^max) MBit/s ∼33% +35%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	423 MBit/s ∼25%

Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12: Ø422 (403-429)

Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø650 (595-706)

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1682 (861-1776)

Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø441 (211-459)

Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø892 (836-935)

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1541 (1418-1606)

网络摄像头

F17配备了一个普通的720p网络摄像头，色彩不佳，整体图像质量很差。

ColorChecker Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W: 16.32 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 23.26 ∆E

安全问题

F17有一个Kensington锁以及TPM 2.0。其他安全功能，例如指纹识别器，并不具备。

配件和保修

就F17的价格范围而言，除了一个240瓦的电源外，盒子里没有其他配件。

欧洲客户得到24个月的有限保修，而美国客户又一次只满足于12个月。

维护

底盖是由12个容易看到的十字螺丝固定的。不幸的是，它们有三种不同的长度，所以你需要跟踪哪颗螺丝的位置。

撬开底盖原来是一个相对简单的经验。卸下盖子后，你可以接触到风扇、电池、SSD和RAM。后两者由一个黑色塑料盖子保护，用胶带固定，此外，固态硬盘也被某种金属箔覆盖，以改善散热。另外还有一个M.2插槽，可供额外的固态硬盘使用。

与FX706相比，新机型在内部看起来很不一样。值得注意的是，它有额外的热管，更大的扬声器，重新定位的SSD等等。

输入设备--小键盘

键盘

键盘布局仍然大体相同，对于17英寸的笔记本来说，它的数字键盘非常窄。光标键仍然只有普通键的一半大小；上/下键占用一个普通键的空间。

新的是位于键盘上方左上方的四个额外的功能键，用于调高和调低音量、静音和启动Armory Crate软件。和以前一样，电源键在右上角是一个专门的独立实体，而作为游戏笔记本上常见的WASD键有一个独立的半透明的白色，与键盘的其他部分形成鲜明的对比。

键盘采用三段式RGB背光，不能对每个键进行自定义，只能对每个区域进行自定义。

键程仍然相对较短，反馈明显但比前代产品更柔和。总的来说，这款键盘的打字感觉非常舒适，噪音排放适中。

触摸板

触摸板不再有专门的按钮，但现在比以前大一些（约13 x 7.7厘米/5.1 x 3英寸）。它的表面是令人愉快的光滑，只有在非常缓慢的移动中才会有轻微的粘性。我们还发现在右下角有一个小死角。

集成的按钮工作正常，没有任何问题，并且有适度的噪音排放。

显示屏 - 昏暗，并非真正为游戏而设

华硕唯一的显示屏是由友达光电生产的FHD IPS 144 Hz面板。

该面板是众所周知的，并且已经存在了相当长的一段时间，鉴于其低亮度只有268尼特，30-40毫秒的缓慢响应时间，以及60%的sRGB和大约41%的AdobeRGB的色彩空间覆盖率，我们已经习惯于看到它被用于更实惠的笔记本电脑，如微星GF75薄。

从正面看，由于整体亮度低，它的黑色水平相当低，使其对比度相对较高。光照度为89%，还算不错。

虽然该面板没有受到PWM闪烁的影响，但它确实受到了轻微但仍然明显的背光出血的影响，沿着其边缘。


261 cd/m²	256 cd/m²	271 cd/m²
270 cd/m²	287 cd/m²	268 cd/m²
263 cd/m²	277 cd/m²	260 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

AU Optronics B173HAN04.9 (AUO4B9D)

X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 287 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 268.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Contrast: 1688:1 (Black: 0.17 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.1 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.2, calibrated: 5.1
ΔE Greyscale 4.24 | 0.57-98 Ø5.4
41.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.44

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 3)

	Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W AU Optronics B173HAN04.9 (AUO4B9D), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM AU Optronics AUI8294 (B173HAN04.9), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE LEN173FHD, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	MSI GE76 Raider AU Optronics B173HAN05.4 (AUOE295), IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 17.30	MSI Katana GF76 11UE AU Optronics B173HAN04.9, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) BOE CQ NE173QHM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30
Display		0%	62%	57%	-1%	67%
Display P3 Coverage	40.2	40.1 0%	64.8 61%	63.1 57%	39.8 -1%	68.1 69%
sRGB Coverage	59.7	60 1%	97.2 63%	94 57%	59.5 0%	98.5 65%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	41.5	41.4 0%	66.7 61%	65.2 57%	41.12 -1%	69.3 67%
Response Times		21%	66%	77%	9%	62%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	39.2 ?(18.2, 21)	32.4 17%	15 ?(7, 8) 62%	5.6 ?(2, 3.6) 86%	36.8 ?(17.2, 19.6) 6%	16.8 ?(8.4, 8.4) 57%
Response Time Black / White *	29.6 ?(15.4, 14.2)	22.4 24%	9 ?(5, 4) 70%	9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4) 68%	26 ?(13.6, 12.4) 12%	10 ?(4.8, 5.2) 66%
PWM Frequency
Screen		-5%	21%	24%	-15%	4%
Brightness middle	287	266 -7%	323 13%	290 1%	260 -9%	370 29%
Brightness	268	264 -1%	305 14%	290 8%	251 -6%	333 24%
Brightness Distribution	89	79 -11%	89 0%	96 8%	85 -4%	84 -6%
Black Level *	0.17	0.32 -88%	0.25 -47%	0.23 -35%	0.26 -53%	0.38 -124%
Contrast	1688	831 -51%	1292 -23%	1261 -25%	1000 -41%	974 -42%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.1	3.97 22%	1.87 63%	1.59 69%	3.9 24%	2.41 53%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.72	8.93 -2%	4.84 44%	3.17 64%	20.64 -137%	7.32 16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	5.1	3.5 31%	0.92 82%	0.87 83%	3.71 27%	1.19 77%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.24	1.8 58%	2.57 39%	2.5 41%	1.6 62%	3.9 8%
Gamma	2.44 ^90%	2.31 ^95%	2.42 ^91%	2.253 ^98%	2.068 ^106%	2.287 ^96%
CCT	6008 ^108%	6754 ^96%	7012 ^93%	6640 ^98%	6511 ^100%	7302 ^89%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)		41.4				69
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)		60				93
Total Average (Program / Settings)		5% / -1%	50% / 36%	53% / 39%	-2% / -9%	44% / 26%

* ... smaller is better

手动校准显示面板几乎没有改善其图像质量。虽然灰度精度略有提高，但我们发现色彩精度根本没有改善。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 15.4 ms rise
29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14.2 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (22.3 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
39.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18.2 ms rise
39.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 52 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (35.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19046 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

由于亮度低，户外使用性非常有限。图像太暗，在明亮的环境中根本无法阅读和使用。

对于IPS面板，我们发现友达光电的面板提供了相对较差的可视角度，在极端角度下亮度明显下降，使这个已经很暗的显示屏更加暗淡，更无法使用。

性能 - 最大的3D性能

搭配了英特尔酷睿i7-12700H和 Nvidia Geforce RTX 3060与16GB的DDR5内存搭配，应该足够强大，可以完成所有的任务和挑战，包括现代游戏，除了可能有一些例外，应该在原生FHD分辨率下以最大的细节完美流畅地运行。

虽然所有SKU的处理器都是相同的，但GPU却不是，华硕提供了四种不同的GPU选择。RTX 3050、RTX 3050 Ti、RTX 3060和RTX 3070。

测试条件

为了达到可能的最佳效果，我们通过随附的Armory Crate软件将性能配置文件设置为 "涡轮"。

鉴于许多选项只能使用华硕自己的软件进行配置，用户基本上没有选择，只能使用它。请记住，一些制造商使用他们的软件来收集用户活动数据。

处理器

ǞǞǞ 英特尔酷睿i7-12700H是英特尔目前Alder Lake家族的成员，总共有14个内核（6个P核，8个E核），共有20个线程。其集成的英特尔Xe图形处理器具有96个EUs，运行速度高达1.4GHz。

在我们30分钟的CineBench循环中，我们的i7-12700H开始时的水平与微星GE76 Raider的Core i9-12900HK相当，但随后迅速下降到更适合上一代的i9-11900H的水平。这在看CPU的TDP时变得非常明显。在前两次运行中，CPU的功耗在几秒钟内达到111W的峰值，然后降低到45W。从第三次迭代开始，峰值被记录为更低的75-80W，然后迅速降低到只有45W。

换句话说：短期爆发性能比前代产品快30%左右，而长期持续性能却没有。

在电池方面，性能从2820点（第一次运行）和1925点（第二次运行及以后）下降到只有1768点。这种性能下降是明显的，但仍然相对较小。

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø1955 (1902.5-2820.28)

Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM Intel Core i9-11900H: Ø1874 (1698.44-2029.22)

MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø2722 (2660.99-2908.88)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	87.5 pt ∼88%
Average of class Gaming	76.2 pt ∼76%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H	76.1 pt ∼76%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Core i7-12700H	70.7 pt ∼71%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM Intel Core i9-11900H	64.9 pt ∼65%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE Intel Core i7-11800H	60.4 pt ∼60%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	56.7 pt ∼57%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	49.3 pt ∼49%

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	18288 Points ∼100% +31%
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34521, n=237, last 2 years)	16251 Points ∼89% +17%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (4032 - 19330, n=62)	15624 Points ∼85% +12%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Core i7-12700H	13934 Points ∼76%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM Intel Core i9-11900H	11567 Points ∼63% -17%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE Intel Core i7-11800H	11080 Points ∼61% -20%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	10416 Points ∼57% -25%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	8408 Points ∼46% -40%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	1909 Points ∼100% +7%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Core i7-12700H	1790 Points ∼94%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (778 - 1826, n=61)	1757 Points ∼92% -2%
Average of class Gaming (527 - 2169, n=235, last 2 years)	1674 Points ∼88% -6%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM Intel Core i9-11900H	1574 Points ∼82% -12%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE Intel Core i7-11800H	1497 Points ∼78% -16%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	1366 Points ∼72% -24%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	1225 Points ∼64% -32%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	6849 Points ∼100% +42%
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=238, last 2 years)	6139 Points ∼90% +28%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (1576 - 7407, n=62)	5926 Points ∼87% +23%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Core i7-12700H	4808 Points ∼70%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM Intel Core i9-11900H	4403 Points ∼64% -8%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE Intel Core i7-11800H	4214 Points ∼62% -12%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	4059 Points ∼59% -16%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	3244 Points ∼47% -33%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	734 Points ∼100% +7%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Core i7-12700H	689 Points ∼94%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (300 - 704, n=62)	678 Points ∼92% -2%
Average of class Gaming (169 - 825, n=238, last 2 years)	646 Points ∼88% -6%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM Intel Core i9-11900H	600 Points ∼82% -13%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE Intel Core i7-11800H	579 Points ∼79% -16%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	535 Points ∼73% -22%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	476 Points ∼65% -31%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	2909 (2660.99^min - 2908.88^max) Points ∼100% +3%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Core i7-12700H	2820 (1902.5^min - 2820.28^max) Points ∼97%
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=241, last 2 years)	2607 Points ∼90% -8%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (1379 - 2916, n=68)	2517 Points ∼87% -11%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM Intel Core i9-11900H	2029 Points ∼70% -28%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE Intel Core i7-11800H	1823 (1645.14^min - 1822.57^max) Points ∼63% -35%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	1723 Points ∼59% -39%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	1382 Points ∼48% -51%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	275 Points ∼100% +7%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Core i7-12700H	257 Points ∼93%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (113 - 263, n=63)	253 Points ∼92% -2%
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 312, n=242, last 2 years)	251 Points ∼91% -2%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM Intel Core i9-11900H	241 Points ∼88% -6%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE Intel Core i7-11800H	226 Points ∼82% -12%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	223 Points ∼81% -13%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	196 Points ∼71% -24%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	326 Seconds * ∼100% -32%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	299.7 Seconds * ∼92% -21%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE Intel Core i7-11800H	284 Seconds * ∼87% -15%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Core i7-12700H	247 Seconds * ∼76%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM Intel Core i9-11900H	242 Seconds * ∼74% +2%
Average of class Gaming (91 - 1259, n=239, last 2 years)	234 Seconds * ∼72% +5%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (168 - 732, n=61)	224 Seconds * ∼69% +9%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	181 Seconds * ∼56% +27%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	72836 MIPS ∼100% +32%
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=235, last 2 years)	65860 MIPS ∼90% +20%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (22844 - 73067, n=61)	60268 MIPS ∼83% +10%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Core i7-12700H	55010 MIPS ∼76%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM Intel Core i9-11900H	50441 MIPS ∼69% -8%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	45428 MIPS ∼62% -17%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE Intel Core i7-11800H	45311 MIPS ∼62% -18%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	40876 MIPS ∼56% -26%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	6144 MIPS ∼100% +10%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM Intel Core i9-11900H	5870 MIPS ∼96% +5%
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=236, last 2 years)	5816 MIPS ∼95% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (2743 - 5972, n=61)	5644 MIPS ∼92% +1%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Core i7-12700H	5588 MIPS ∼91%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE Intel Core i7-11800H	5511 MIPS ∼90% -1%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	5393 MIPS ∼88% -3%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	5369 MIPS ∼87% -4%

Geekbench 5.4 / Multi-Core
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	13648 Points ∼100% +8%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Core i7-12700H	12661 Points ∼93%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (5144 - 13745, n=62)	11710 Points ∼86% -8%
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=234, last 2 years)	11587 Points ∼85% -8%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE Intel Core i7-11800H	8470 Points ∼62% -33%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM Intel Core i9-11900H	7725 Points ∼57% -39%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	6688 Points ∼49% -47%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	6641 Points ∼49% -48%

Geekbench 5.4 / Single-Core
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	1918 Points ∼100% +9%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Core i7-12700H	1756 Points ∼92%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (803 - 1851, n=62)	1731 Points ∼90% -1%
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2139, n=234, last 2 years)	1689 Points ∼88% -4%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM Intel Core i9-11900H	1576 Points ∼82% -10%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE Intel Core i7-11800H	1568 Points ∼82% -11%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	1417 Points ∼74% -19%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	1264 Points ∼66% -28%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	19.9 fps ∼100% +41%
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=239, last 2 years)	18.2 fps ∼91% +29%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (4.67 - 21.8, n=62)	16.7 fps ∼84% +18%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM Intel Core i9-11900H	14.9 fps ∼75% +6%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Core i7-12700H	14.1 fps ∼71%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE Intel Core i7-11800H	13.3 fps ∼67% -6%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	13.2 fps ∼66% -6%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	11.1 fps ∼56% -21%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Core i7-12700H	86.1 s * ∼100%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	56.1 s * ∼65% +35%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	53.3 s * ∼62% +38%
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=235, last 2 years)	50.8 s * ∼59% +41%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE Intel Core i7-11800H	49.2 s * ∼57% +43%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM Intel Core i9-11900H	45.8 s * ∼53% +47%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (34.2 - 95.3, n=61)	45.8 s * ∼53% +47%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	38.9 s * ∼45% +55%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	0.577 sec * ∼100% -25%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE Intel Core i7-11800H	0.559 sec * ∼97% -21%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	0.533 sec * ∼92% -16%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM Intel Core i9-11900H	0.529 sec * ∼92% -15%
Average of class Gaming (0.375 - 4.47, n=235, last 2 years)	0.503 sec * ∼87% -9%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (0.4441 - 1.052, n=61)	0.4724 sec * ∼82% -2%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Core i7-12700H	0.4614 sec * ∼80%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	0.4252 sec * ∼74% +8%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2820 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

257 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

194 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming	95.7 pt ∼96%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	81 pt ∼81%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H	79 pt ∼79%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	78.9 pt ∼79%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	62 pt ∼62%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	61.4 pt ∼61%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM ^-9! Intel Core i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	0 pt ∼0%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE ^-9! Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	0 pt ∼0%

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming (2585 - 55084, n=213, last 2 years)	14770 KRay/s ∼100% +117%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	12636 KRay/s ∼86% +86%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (2585 - 17957, n=61)	10801 KRay/s ∼73% +59%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	10072 KRay/s ∼68% +48%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	9065 KRay/s ∼61% +33%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	6797 KRay/s ∼46%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	78250 Points ∼100% +142%
Average of class Gaming (12439 - 234848, n=213, last 2 years)	77647 Points ∼99% +140%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (12439 - 90760, n=61)	52646 Points ∼67% +63%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	52336 Points ∼67% +62%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	40570 Points ∼52% +25%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	32381 Points ∼41%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Gaming (629 - 9930, n=213, last 2 years)	3651 MB/s ∼100% +57%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	3178 MB/s ∼87% +36%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (833 - 4242, n=61)	3078 MB/s ∼84% +32%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	2675 MB/s ∼73% +15%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	2543 MB/s ∼70% +9%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	2331 MB/s ∼64%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	106414 Points ∼100% +7%
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 186519, n=213, last 2 years)	101342 Points ∼95% +2%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	99296 Points ∼93%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (57923 - 103202, n=61)	97871 Points ∼92% -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	76986 Points ∼72% -22%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	72108 Points ∼68% -27%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 30810, n=213, last 2 years)	11117 Points ∼100% +34%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	10237 Points ∼92% +23%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	9157 Points ∼82% +10%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (3249 - 9939, n=61)	9064 Points ∼82% +9%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	8862 Points ∼80% +7%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	8317 Points ∼75%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	43274 Points ∼100% +129%
Average of class Gaming (7135 - 124377, n=213, last 2 years)	41380 Points ∼96% +119%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (7135 - 44760, n=61)	27881 Points ∼64% +48%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	25823 Points ∼60% +37%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	24693 Points ∼57% +31%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	18863 Points ∼44%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Average of class Gaming (18146 - 236139, n=213, last 2 years)	105215 MB/s ∼100% +113%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	100062 MB/s ∼95% +102%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	98939 MB/s ∼94% +100%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (31839 - 144360, n=61)	84959 MB/s ∼81% +72%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	49493 MB/s ∼47%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	34383 MB/s ∼33% -31%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	1085 MB/s ∼100% +38%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (305 - 1171, n=61)	972 MB/s ∼90% +24%
Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2231, n=227, last 2 years)	959 MB/s ∼88% +22%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	787 MB/s ∼73%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	649 MB/s ∼60% -18%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	609 MB/s ∼56% -23%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	0 MB/s ∼0% -100%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM Intel Core i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	0 MB/s ∼0% -100%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming (1437 - 29473, n=213, last 2 years)	8021 KRay/s ∼100% +105%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	6505 KRay/s ∼81% +66%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (1437 - 9692, n=61)	5974 KRay/s ∼74% +53%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	5481 KRay/s ∼68% +40%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	5239 KRay/s ∼65% +34%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	3917 KRay/s ∼49%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	40000 MPixel/s ∼100% +22%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (12863 - 52207, n=61)	32995 MPixel/s ∼82% 0%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	32915 MPixel/s ∼82%
Average of class Gaming (8341 - 52949, n=214, last 2 years)	31433 MPixel/s ∼79% -5%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	20568 MPixel/s ∼51% -38%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	16101 MPixel/s ∼40% -51%

系统性能

在PCMark 10中，F17的表现比我们预期的要差得多，比同类系统的平均水平低6-15％。它只在数字内容创作中能够超过自己的前辈，但总体上表现得更慢。我们能够通过第二次运行测试来重现这些结果。

从主观上讲，该系统表现得非常平稳，没有任何明显的打嗝现象。

PCMark 10 / Score
MSI GE76 Raider GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	8007 Points ∼100% +34%
Average of class Gaming (4477 - 9331, n=194, last 2 years)	7264 Points ∼91% +21%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (5986 - 8156, n=12)	7232 Points ∼90% +21%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	6901 Points ∼86% +15%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU	6615 Points ∼83% +11%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	6505 Points ∼81% +9%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	5986 Points ∼75%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	5685 Points ∼71% -5%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
MSI GE76 Raider GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	10688 Points ∼100% +15%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	10602 Points ∼99% +14%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (9289 - 12144, n=12)	10576 Points ∼99% +14%
Average of class Gaming (7334 - 12176, n=193, last 2 years)	10460 Points ∼98% +13%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	9695 Points ∼91% +4%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU	9639 Points ∼90% +4%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	9289 Points ∼87%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	9182 Points ∼86% -1%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
MSI GE76 Raider GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	10100 Points ∼100% +64%
Average of class Gaming (6161 - 11833, n=193, last 2 years)	9459 Points ∼94% +54%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (6161 - 10362, n=12)	9156 Points ∼91% +49%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	9071 Points ∼90% +47%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU	9027 Points ∼89% +47%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	8874 Points ∼88% +44%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	7217 Points ∼71% +17%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	6161 Points ∼61%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
MSI GE76 Raider GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	12905 Points ∼100% +27%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (8950 - 12554, n=12)	10653 Points ∼83% +5%
Average of class Gaming (5288 - 16424, n=193, last 2 years)	10575 Points ∼82% +4%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	10175 Points ∼79%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	9274 Points ∼72% -9%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU	9026 Points ∼70% -11%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	8684 Points ∼67% -15%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	7526 Points ∼58% -26%

CrossMark / Overall
Average of class Gaming (974 - 2295, n=117, last 2 years)	1842 Points ∼100% +12%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1649 - 2017, n=11)	1806 Points ∼98% +10%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	1649 Points ∼90%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU	1337 Points ∼73% -19%

CrossMark / Productivity
Average of class Gaming (907 - 2166, n=117, last 2 years)	1762 Points ∼100% +15%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1536 - 1958, n=11)	1723 Points ∼98% +12%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	1536 Points ∼87%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU	1370 Points ∼78% -11%

CrossMark / Creativity
Average of class Gaming (1027 - 2514, n=117, last 2 years)	1988 Points ∼100% +1%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	1963 Points ∼99%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1816 - 2084, n=11)	1949 Points ∼98% -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU	1372 Points ∼69% -30%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 2275, n=117, last 2 years)	1690 Points ∼100% +40%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1210 - 2207, n=11)	1665 Points ∼99% +38%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	1210 Points ∼72%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU	1148 Points ∼68% -5%

PCMark 10 Score		5986 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	62554 MB/s ∼100% +18%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (25615 - 80511, n=61)	53737 MB/s ∼86% +2%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	52925 MB/s ∼85%
Average of class Gaming (18074 - 80776, n=213, last 2 years)	52684 MB/s ∼84% 0%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	38867 MB/s ∼62% -27%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	36548 MB/s ∼58% -31%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	65452 MB/s ∼100% +4%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	62745 MB/s ∼96%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (25586 - 79442, n=61)	57183 MB/s ∼87% -9%
Average of class Gaming (20318 - 89096, n=213, last 2 years)	56563 MB/s ∼86% -10%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	44282 MB/s ∼68% -29%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	40016 MB/s ∼61% -36%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	64282 MB/s ∼100% +11%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	57728 MB/s ∼90%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (23679 - 88660, n=61)	54607 MB/s ∼85% -5%
Average of class Gaming (15975 - 80441, n=213, last 2 years)	53652 MB/s ∼83% -7%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	40678 MB/s ∼63% -30%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	36998 MB/s ∼58% -36%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	92.6 ns * ∼100%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	78.5 ns * ∼85%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (76.2 - 133.9, n=61)	75.1 ns * ∼81%
Average of class Gaming (76.2 - 135.3, n=227, last 2 years)	73.9 ns * ∼80%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	56.6 ns * ∼61%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	0 ns * ∼0%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM Intel Core i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	0 ns * ∼0%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	0 ns * ∼0%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

不幸的是，我们在启动Edge浏览器时已经发现了明显的DPC延迟。积极的一面是，从那时起，无论我们进行什么测试，这些都没有变得更糟。这意味着我们的4K/60 FPS YouTube视频测试运行得不是很好，总共有14个丢帧。我们对这种行为的主要怀疑是NT的内核驱动。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Katana GF76 11UE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	4527 μs * ∼100% -95%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2319 μs * ∼51%
MSI GE76 Raider GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1642 μs * ∼36% +29%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU	1564 μs * ∼35% +33%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	1399 μs * ∼31% +40%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	743 μs * ∼16% +68%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

我们的评测单元配备了1TB SK Hynix PCIe 3 SSD，它在我们的SSD/HDD排行榜上排在第44位。 SSD/HDD排行榜的第44位.同样的SSD已经安装在F17的前身中。它总体表现良好，但无法跟上XMG Core或MSI Raider中的三星固态硬盘。

持续的读取性能原来是相当不稳定的，并在短时间内出现波动。这可能是其总体上低于PCMark平均性能的原因之一。

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3364 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3042 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 514 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 445.3 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 25.64 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 213.9 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 1665 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 2024 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	93.4 pt ∼93%
Average of class Gaming	72.9 pt ∼73%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	60.4 pt ∼60%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	54.8 pt ∼55%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	54.5 pt ∼55%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	52.7 pt ∼53%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU	42.7 pt ∼43%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	24.4 pt ∼24%

DiskSpd
seq read
Average of class Gaming (834 - 6045, n=195, last 2 years)	3144 MB/s ∼100% +77%
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2529 (2450.31^min - 2528.54^max) MB/s ∼80% +42%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2183 (2113.09^min - 2182.51^max) MB/s ∼69% +23%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	2144 (2055.42^min - 2144.01^max) MB/s ∼68% +20%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N (1780 - 2383, n=18)	2071 MB/s ∼66% +16%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU	1956 (1938.61^min - 1956.43^max) MB/s ∼62% +10%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	1780 (1752.32^min - 1780.06^max) MB/s ∼57%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	1780 (1752.32^min - 1780.06^max) MB/s ∼57% 0%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	1061 (106.95^min - 1061.13^max) MB/s ∼34% -40%
seq write
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3923 (3818.83^min - 3922.64^max) MB/s ∼100% +48%
Average of class Gaming (399 - 9108, n=194, last 2 years)	3356 MB/s ∼86% +27%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2643 (2559.24^min - 2642.87^max) MB/s ∼67%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2643 (2559.24^min - 2642.87^max) MB/s ∼67% 0%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	2425 (2355.41^min - 2424.54^max) MB/s ∼62% -8%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N (1886 - 2909, n=18)	2343 MB/s ∼60% -11%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2095 (2074.34^min - 2094.85^max) MB/s ∼53% -21%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU	1604 (1586.29^min - 1604.11^max) MB/s ∼41% -39%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	978 (971.82^min - 978.46^max) MB/s ∼25% -63%
seq q8 t1 read
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	6722 (5765.49^min - 6722^max) MB/s ∼100% +91%
Average of class Gaming (1620 - 16089, n=195, last 2 years)	5530 MB/s ∼82% +57%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N (3515 - 3607, n=18)	3565 MB/s ∼53% +1%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	3542 (3289.1^min - 3542.3^max) MB/s ∼53% +1%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	3515 (2963.07^min - 3514.83^max) MB/s ∼52%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	3515 (2963.07^min - 3514.83^max) MB/s ∼52% 0%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	3468 (3143.21^min - 3467.64^max) MB/s ∼52% -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU	2646 (2421.6^min - 2645.77^max) MB/s ∼39% -25%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	1985 (1757.88^min - 1984.76^max) MB/s ∼30% -44%
seq q8 t1 write
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4999 (4978.75^min - 4998.98^max) MB/s ∼100% +66%
Average of class Gaming (86.2 - 14571, n=195, last 2 years)	4132 MB/s ∼83% +37%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	3302 (3294.84^min - 3301.55^max) MB/s ∼66% +10%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	3091 (2656.88^min - 3090.57^max) MB/s ∼62% +3%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N (2869 - 3098, n=18)	3014 MB/s ∼60% 0%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	3012 (2669.05^min - 3012.29^max) MB/s ∼60%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	3012 (2669.05^min - 3012.29^max) MB/s ∼60% 0%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU	1597 (1579.16^min - 1597.4^max) MB/s ∼32% -47%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	979 (974.28^min - 979.37^max) MB/s ∼20% -67%
4k q1 t1 read
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	89.8 (89.42^min - 89.75^max) MB/s ∼100% +175%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	68.6 (68.41^min - 68.6^max) MB/s ∼76% +110%
Average of class Gaming (23.3 - 97.4, n=195, last 2 years)	65.8 MB/s ∼73% +102%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N (32.6 - 70.5, n=18)	56.9 MB/s ∼63% +75%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU	47.4 (47.27^min - 47.41^max) MB/s ∼53% +45%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	47.3 (42.61^min - 47.31^max) MB/s ∼53% +45%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	32.6 (30.94^min - 32.64^max) MB/s ∼36%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	32.6 (30.94^min - 32.64^max) MB/s ∼36% 0%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	32.4 (32.28^min - 32.44^max) MB/s ∼36% -1%
4k q1 t1 write
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	275 (273.95^min - 275.11^max) MB/s ∼100% +27%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	216 (185.22^min - 215.93^max) MB/s ∼79%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	216 (185.22^min - 215.93^max) MB/s ∼79% 0%
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 421, n=194, last 2 years)	210 MB/s ∼76% -3%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	173 (172.14^min - 172.83^max) MB/s ∼63% -20%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N (81.2 - 216, n=18)	153.8 MB/s ∼56% -29%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU	144 (143.24^min - 143.97^max) MB/s ∼52% -33%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	136 (136.06^min - 136.26^max) MB/s ∼49% -37%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	112 (108.3^min - 111.94^max) MB/s ∼41% -48%
4k q32 t16 read
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4073 (4064.94^min - 4073.47^max) MB/s ∼100% +84%
Average of class Gaming (313 - 5829, n=194, last 2 years)	2342 MB/s ∼58% +6%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2214 (2192.88^min - 2214.37^max) MB/s ∼54%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2214 (2192.88^min - 2214.37^max) MB/s ∼54% 0%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	1888 (1886.26^min - 1887.59^max) MB/s ∼46% -15%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N (628 - 2217, n=18)	1337 MB/s ∼33% -40%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU	1079 (1063.35^min - 1079.33^max) MB/s ∼26% -51%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	751 (741.76^min - 751.2^max) MB/s ∼18% -66%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	310 (293.77^min - 309.72^max) MB/s ∼8% -86%
4k q32 t16 write
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	2668 (2644.15^min - 2667.88^max) MB/s ∼100% +16%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2307 (2258.85^min - 2307.29^max) MB/s ∼86%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2307 (2258.85^min - 2307.29^max) MB/s ∼86% 0%
Average of class Gaming (288 - 4869, n=194, last 2 years)	2036 MB/s ∼76% -12%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU	1200 (1178.03^min - 1199.78^max) MB/s ∼45% -48%
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1066 (1060.72^min - 1066.17^max) MB/s ∼40% -54%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	976 (973.27^min - 976.25^max) MB/s ∼37% -58%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N (394 - 2341, n=18)	883 MB/s ∼33% -62%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	429 (419.23^min - 429.09^max) MB/s ∼16% -81%

AS SSD
Score Total
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	8982 Points ∼100% +63%
Average of class Gaming (910 - 10745, n=183, last 2 years)	6343 Points ∼71% +15%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	5520 Points ∼61% 0%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	5514 Points ∼61%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N (3615 - 6117, n=15)	4797 Points ∼53% -13%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	4695 Points ∼52% -15%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU	3055 Points ∼34% -45%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	1816 Points ∼20% -67%
Score Read
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3344 Points ∼100% +58%
Average of class Gaming (389 - 3980, n=183, last 2 years)	2372 Points ∼71% +12%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2121 Points ∼63%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	2005 Points ∼60% -5%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N (1221 - 2291, n=15)	1706 Points ∼51% -20%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	1666 Points ∼50% -21%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU	1274 Points ∼38% -40%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	649 Points ∼19% -69%
Score Write
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3997 Points ∼100% +72%
Average of class Gaming (338 - 5157, n=183, last 2 years)	2807 Points ∼70% +21%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	2488 Points ∼62% +7%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2324 Points ∼58%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N (1638 - 2660, n=15)	2258 Points ∼56% -3%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2232 Points ∼56% -4%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU	1190 Points ∼30% -49%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	872 Points ∼22% -62%
Seq Read
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5120 MB/s ∼100% +93%
Average of class Gaming (925 - 12763, n=183, last 2 years)	4352 MB/s ∼85% +64%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	2876 MB/s ∼56% +8%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N (2635 - 3133, n=15)	2839 MB/s ∼55% +7%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2837 MB/s ∼55% +7%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU	2725 MB/s ∼53% +3%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2656 MB/s ∼52%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	1704 MB/s ∼33% -36%
Seq Write
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3692 MB/s ∼100% +46%
Average of class Gaming (308 - 11316, n=183, last 2 years)	3162 MB/s ∼86% +25%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	2803 MB/s ∼76% +11%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2535 MB/s ∼69%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N (1243 - 2969, n=15)	1917 MB/s ∼52% -24%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	1565 MB/s ∼42% -38%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU	1364 MB/s ∼37% -46%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	716 MB/s ∼19% -72%
4K Read
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	82.8 MB/s ∼100% +187%
Average of class Gaming (20 - 108, n=183, last 2 years)	64.6 MB/s ∼78% +124%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	55.4 MB/s ∼67% +92%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	55.3 MB/s ∼67% +92%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N (28.8 - 66.9, n=15)	53 MB/s ∼64% +84%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU	45.38 MB/s ∼55% +57%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	37.77 MB/s ∼46% +31%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	28.83 MB/s ∼35%
4K Write
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	241.3 MB/s ∼100% +309%
Average of class Gaming (18 - 364, n=183, last 2 years)	190.4 MB/s ∼79% +223%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	152.9 MB/s ∼63% +159%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU	132.4 MB/s ∼55% +124%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N (59 - 184.8, n=15)	127.3 MB/s ∼53% +116%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	106.9 MB/s ∼44% +81%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	66 MB/s ∼27% +12%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	59 MB/s ∼24%
4K-64 Read
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2749 MB/s ∼100% +50%
Average of class Gaming (216 - 3395, n=183, last 2 years)	1872 MB/s ∼68% +2%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	1827 MB/s ∼66%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	1662 MB/s ∼60% -9%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N (873 - 1923, n=15)	1369 MB/s ∼50% -25%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	1327 MB/s ∼48% -27%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU	956 MB/s ∼35% -48%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	441.2 MB/s ∼16% -76%
4K-64 Write
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3387 MB/s ∼100% +68%
Average of class Gaming (243 - 4381, n=183, last 2 years)	2306 MB/s ∼68% +15%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	2101 MB/s ∼62% +4%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2011 MB/s ∼59%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N (1342 - 2216, n=15)	1939 MB/s ∼57% -4%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	1922 MB/s ∼57% -4%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU	921 MB/s ∼27% -54%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	735 MB/s ∼22% -63%
Access Time Read
MSI Katana GF76 11UE Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	0.191 ms * ∼100% -155%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU	0.102 ms * ∼53% -36%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	0.075 ms * ∼39%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	0.067 ms * ∼35% +11%
Average of class Gaming (0.02 - 0.23, n=178, last 2 years)	0.05483 ms * ∼29% +27%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N (0.028 - 0.093, n=15)	0.0468 ms * ∼25% +38%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	0.035 ms * ∼18% +53%