华硕TUF游戏F17笔记本评测。良好的3D性能和电池寿命满足了暗淡的显示屏

继去年的小规模更新之后,华硕今年选择了对其经济实惠的17英寸游戏笔记本电脑进行大修。其结果是一个新设计和更新的外壳,一个支持DDR5内存的英特尔Alder Lake CPU,以及总共四个GPU选项,包括我们审查单位的GTX 3060。
除了其直接的第11代前辈,我们的对比组中还包括一些17英寸游戏笔记本,包括 联想Legion 5 17,以及 MSI GE76 Raider(相同的CPU), 微星 微星Katana GF76(相同的GPU与11代CPU),以及 申克XMG核心17(第十代CPU)。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
84.1 % | 04/2022 | Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 25 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
82.8 % | 10/2021 | Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 26 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
85.2 % | 02/2022 | Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 3.1 kg | 24.3 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
87.5 % | 01/2022 | MSI GE76 Raider i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 3 kg | 26 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
80.4 % | 09/2021 | MSI Katana GF76 11UE i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 25.2 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
83.9 % | Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 30.05 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1440 |
外壳 - 金属盖子,塑料底座
更新后的设计采用了与前代相似的颜色。之前非常突出的TUF标志已经被移除,取而代之的是金属显示盖中间一个小得多的突出印记。装饰有 "假螺丝 "的边角保持不变。
在顶部,我们发现一种突出的物理凹槽,容纳了摄像头和麦克风,作为打开显示盖的闩锁。没有办法只用一只手打开笔记本电脑;需要两只手。
在显示屏盖子关闭的情况下,一个小的星形LED面板显示笔记本电脑的当前状态,例如,它是否正在充电或是否已置于飞行模式。
打开显示盖后,可以发现另一个不同之处。底座由坚固的塑料制成,不再有 "时尚 "的梯度装饰,而是完全水平,因此是平的。相应地,键盘也不再凹进到顶部的机箱中。
风扇通风口不再沿着设备的整个宽度定位,而是变得更小,现在位于右侧。
说到厚度,华硕的官方规格为22.9毫米,这很有欺骗性。它的最薄处可能只有这么厚,但是它的50%以上的表面又被提高了2-3毫米,导致实际厚度接近25毫米。
就占地面积而言,新设计比前代产品略窄几毫米,而且能够减轻约200克(7盎司)的重量。
它的大多数(公认的旧)竞争对手都更大,除了稍薄但明显更重的联想Legion 。
连接性 - Thunderbolt 4;Wi-Fi不佳
端口与前代产品基本保持一致,除了一个USB-A端口变成了USB-C端口外,总共有两个USB-C端口,其中一个与雷电4控制器相连。
此外,鉴于后部两侧配备了额外的风扇通风口,所有的端口都稍微向前移动。右撇子会很高兴听到该设备的右侧只配备了一个USB端口,而左撇子可能会对这个定位提出异议。我们还发现该设备的耳机插孔离USB-A端口太近。否则,端口间距总体上还可以。
沟通
有线通信由CPU的集成控制器处理,该控制器在2015年首次推出。相应地,它只支持高达1 Gbps的速度。相比之下,许多现代网络控制器支持2.5Gbps或更高的速度。
无线通信是由非常常见的英特尔AX201适配器处理的。不幸的是,F17的执行速度特别慢,传输速度只有其竞争对手的一半左右。这在其前辈身上已经存在,我们很失望地看到它没有得到解决和改进。
Networking | |
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12 | |
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
MSI Katana GF76 11UE | |
MSI GE76 Raider | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (49.8 - 1775, n=322) | |
Average of class Gaming (450 - 1622, n=166, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12 | |
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
MSI Katana GF76 11UE | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (136 - 1743, n=322) | |
Average of class Gaming (90 - 1743, n=166, last 2 years) | |
MSI GE76 Raider | |
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W |
网络摄像头
F17配备了一个普通的720p网络摄像头,色彩不佳,整体图像质量很差。

安全问题
F17有一个Kensington锁以及TPM 2.0。其他安全功能,例如指纹识别器,并不具备。
维护
输入设备--小键盘
键盘
键盘布局仍然大体相同,对于17英寸的笔记本来说,它的数字键盘非常窄。光标键仍然只有普通键的一半大小;上/下键占用一个普通键的空间。
新的是位于键盘上方左上方的四个额外的功能键,用于调高和调低音量、静音和启动Armory Crate软件。和以前一样,电源键在右上角是一个专门的独立实体,而作为游戏笔记本上常见的WASD键有一个独立的半透明的白色,与键盘的其他部分形成鲜明的对比。
键盘采用三段式RGB背光,不能对每个键进行自定义,只能对每个区域进行自定义。
键程仍然相对较短,反馈明显但比前代产品更柔和。总的来说,这款键盘的打字感觉非常舒适,噪音排放适中。
触摸板
显示屏 - 昏暗,并非真正为游戏而设
|
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Contrast: 1688:1 (Black: 0.17 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.1 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4, calibrated: 5.1
ΔE Greyscale 4.24 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
41.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.44
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W AU Optronics B173HAN04.9 (AUO4B9D), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30 | Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM AU Optronics AUI8294 (B173HAN04.9), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30 | Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE LEN173FHD, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30 | MSI GE76 Raider AU Optronics B173HAN05.4 (AUOE295), IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 17.30 | MSI Katana GF76 11UE AU Optronics B173HAN04.9, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30 | Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) BOE CQ NE173QHM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 0% | 62% | 57% | -1% | 67% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 40.2 | 40.1 0% | 64.8 61% | 63.1 57% | 39.8 -1% | 68.1 69% |
sRGB Coverage | 59.7 | 60 1% | 97.2 63% | 94 57% | 59.5 0% | 98.5 65% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41.5 | 41.4 0% | 66.7 61% | 65.2 57% | 41.12 -1% | 69.3 67% |
Response Times | 21% | 66% | 77% | 9% | 62% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 39.2 ? | 32.4 17% | 15 ? 62% | 5.6 ? 86% | 36.8 ? 6% | 16.8 ? 57% |
Response Time Black / White * | 29.6 ? | 22.4 24% | 9 ? 70% | 9.6 ? 68% | 26 ? 12% | 10 ? 66% |
PWM Frequency | ||||||
Screen | -5% | 21% | 24% | -15% | 4% | |
Brightness middle | 287 | 266 -7% | 323 13% | 290 1% | 260 -9% | 370 29% |
Brightness | 268 | 264 -1% | 305 14% | 290 8% | 251 -6% | 333 24% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 79 -11% | 89 0% | 96 8% | 85 -4% | 84 -6% |
Black Level * | 0.17 | 0.32 -88% | 0.25 -47% | 0.23 -35% | 0.26 -53% | 0.38 -124% |
Contrast | 1688 | 831 -51% | 1292 -23% | 1261 -25% | 1000 -41% | 974 -42% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.1 | 3.97 22% | 1.87 63% | 1.59 69% | 3.9 24% | 2.41 53% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.72 | 8.93 -2% | 4.84 44% | 3.17 64% | 20.64 -137% | 7.32 16% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 5.1 | 3.5 31% | 0.92 82% | 0.87 83% | 3.71 27% | 1.19 77% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.24 | 1.8 58% | 2.57 39% | 2.5 41% | 1.6 62% | 3.9 8% |
Gamma | 2.44 90% | 2.31 95% | 2.42 91% | 2.253 98% | 2.068 106% | 2.287 96% |
CCT | 6008 108% | 6754 96% | 7012 93% | 6640 98% | 6511 100% | 7302 89% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 41.4 | 69 | ||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 60 | 93 | ||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 5% /
-1% | 50% /
36% | 53% /
39% | -2% /
-9% | 44% /
26% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.4 ms rise | |
↘ 14.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 72 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (23.4 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
39.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.2 ms rise | |
↘ 21 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (37 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21940 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
性能 - 最大的3D性能
搭配了 英特尔酷睿i7-12700H和 Nvidia Geforce RTX 3060与16GB的DDR5内存搭配,应该足够强大,可以完成所有的任务和挑战,包括现代游戏,除了可能有一些例外,应该在原生FHD分辨率下以最大的细节完美流畅地运行。
虽然所有SKU的处理器都是相同的,但GPU却不是,华硕提供了四种不同的GPU选择。RTX 3050、RTX 3050 Ti、RTX 3060和RTX 3070。
测试条件
处理器
ǞǞǞ 英特尔酷睿i7-12700H是英特尔目前Alder Lake家族的成员,总共有14个内核(6个P核,8个E核),共有20个线程。其集成的英特尔Xe图形处理器具有96个EUs,运行速度高达1.4GHz。
在我们30分钟的CineBench循环中,我们的i7-12700H开始时的水平与微星GE76 Raider的Core i9-12900HK相当,但随后迅速下降到更适合上一代的i9-11900H的水平。这在看CPU的TDP时变得非常明显。在前两次运行中,CPU的功耗在几秒钟内达到111W的峰值,然后降低到45W。从第三次迭代开始,峰值被记录为更低的75-80W,然后迅速降低到只有45W。
换句话说:短期爆发性能比前代产品快30%左右,而长期持续性能却没有。
在电池方面,性能从2820点(第一次运行)和1925点(第二次运行及以后)下降到只有1768点。这种性能下降是明显的,但仍然相对较小。
Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load
Cinebench R23: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | 64 Bit Single-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
MSI GE76 Raider | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM | |
MSI Katana GF76 11UE | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) |
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
MSI GE76 Raider | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (4032 - 19250, n=16) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Average of class Gaming (4032 - 19282, n=155, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM | |
MSI Katana GF76 11UE | |
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) |
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Single Core) | |
MSI GE76 Raider | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (778 - 1825, n=15) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM | |
MSI Katana GF76 11UE | |
Average of class Gaming (778 - 1920, n=154, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
MSI GE76 Raider | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (1576 - 7382, n=16) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM | |
Average of class Gaming (1397 - 7382, n=227, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana GF76 11UE | |
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
MSI GE76 Raider | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (300 - 702, n=16) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM | |
MSI Katana GF76 11UE | |
Average of class Gaming (300 - 736, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
MSI GE76 Raider | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (1379 - 2903, n=16) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM | |
MSI Katana GF76 11UE | |
Average of class Gaming (536 - 2944, n=239, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
MSI GE76 Raider | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (113 - 263, n=16) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM | |
MSI Katana GF76 11UE | |
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
Average of class Gaming (108 - 277, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) |
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU | |
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
Average of class Gaming (168 - 732, n=226, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana GF76 11UE | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (171 - 732, n=15) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM | |
MSI GE76 Raider |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
MSI GE76 Raider | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (22844 - 73067, n=15) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM | |
Average of class Gaming (21148 - 76063, n=226, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
MSI Katana GF76 11UE | |
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
MSI GE76 Raider | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
MSI Katana GF76 11UE | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (2743 - 5863, n=15) | |
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
Average of class Gaming (2743 - 6506, n=226, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
MSI GE76 Raider | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (5144 - 13745, n=16) | |
MSI Katana GF76 11UE | |
Average of class Gaming (2783 - 14294, n=219, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM | |
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE |
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
MSI GE76 Raider | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (803 - 1851, n=16) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM | |
MSI Katana GF76 11UE | |
Average of class Gaming (703 - 1918, n=219, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
MSI GE76 Raider | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (4.67 - 21.4, n=15) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Average of class Gaming (4.67 - 22, n=225, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana GF76 11UE | |
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
Average of class Gaming (23.9 - 113, n=223, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana GF76 11UE | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (34.2 - 92, n=15) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM | |
MSI GE76 Raider |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
MSI Katana GF76 11UE | |
Average of class Gaming (0.4218 - 1.088, n=222, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (0.448 - 1.052, n=15) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
MSI GE76 Raider |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
MSI GE76 Raider | |
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H | |
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM -9! | |
MSI Katana GF76 11UE -9! |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
Average of class Gaming (2585 - 19199, n=180, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
MSI GE76 Raider | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (2585 - 9576, n=15) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
Average of class Gaming (12439 - 110797, n=180, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
MSI GE76 Raider | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (12439 - 41732, n=15) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
MSI GE76 Raider | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (833 - 3442, n=15) | |
Average of class Gaming (833 - 4851, n=180, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
MSI GE76 Raider | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (57923 - 99861, n=15) | |
Average of class Gaming (30447 - 132615, n=180, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
MSI GE76 Raider | |
Average of class Gaming (3007 - 17639, n=180, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (3249 - 9928, n=15) | |
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
Average of class Gaming (7135 - 61370, n=180, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
MSI GE76 Raider | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (7135 - 27081, n=15) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
MSI GE76 Raider | |
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (31839 - 102398, n=15) | |
Average of class Gaming (11368 - 156370, n=180, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
MSI GE76 Raider | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (305 - 1164, n=15) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Average of class Gaming (305 - 1209, n=201, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
MSI Katana GF76 11UE | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
Average of class Gaming (1437 - 10472, n=180, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
MSI GE76 Raider | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (1437 - 5742, n=15) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
MSI GE76 Raider | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (22254 - 46643, n=15) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Average of class Gaming (8341 - 46643, n=180, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE |
系统性能
在PCMark 10中,F17的表现比我们预期的要差得多,比同类系统的平均水平低6-15%。它只在数字内容创作中能够超过自己的前辈,但总体上表现得更慢。我们能够通过第二次运行测试来重现这些结果。
从主观上讲,该系统表现得非常平稳,没有任何明显的打嗝现象。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
MSI GE76 Raider | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (5986 - 7426, n=3) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
MSI Katana GF76 11UE | |
Average of class Gaming (4077 - 8186, n=191, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
MSI GE76 Raider | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (9289 - 10499, n=3) | |
Average of class Gaming (7148 - 11205, n=190, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana GF76 11UE | |
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
MSI GE76 Raider | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM | |
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
MSI Katana GF76 11UE | |
Average of class Gaming (6161 - 10638, n=190, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (6161 - 9602, n=3) | |
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
MSI GE76 Raider | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (10118 - 11672, n=3) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM | |
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
MSI Katana GF76 11UE | |
Average of class Gaming (3670 - 13098, n=190, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1649 - 1910, n=2) | |
Average of class Gaming (974 - 2108, n=23, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1536 - 1797, n=2) | |
Average of class Gaming (907 - 2062, n=23, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1963 - 2072, n=2) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Average of class Gaming (1027 - 2165, n=23, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 2230, n=23, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1210 - 1798, n=2) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE |
PCMark 10 Score | 5986 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
MSI GE76 Raider | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (43855 - 77803, n=15) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Average of class Gaming (18074 - 77803, n=180, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
MSI GE76 Raider | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (45897 - 76185, n=15) | |
Average of class Gaming (20318 - 76185, n=180, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
MSI GE76 Raider | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (42088 - 66256, n=15) | |
Average of class Gaming (15975 - 66256, n=180, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
MSI GE76 Raider | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (90.1 - 122, n=15) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
Average of class Gaming (78.1 - 122, n=202, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
MSI Katana GF76 11UE | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
MSI Katana GF76 11UE | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
MSI GE76 Raider | |
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM | |
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的评测单元配备了1TB SK Hynix PCIe 3 SSD,它在我们的SSD/HDD排行榜上排在第44位。 SSD/HDD排行榜的第44位.同样的SSD已经安装在F17的前身中。它总体表现良好,但无法跟上XMG Core或MSI Raider中的三星固态硬盘。
持续的读取性能原来是相当不稳定的,并在短时间内出现波动。这可能是其总体上低于PCMark平均性能的原因之一。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
MSI GE76 Raider | |
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM | |
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N | |
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
MSI Katana GF76 11UE |