Notebookcheck Logo

MSI Raider GE66 12UHS笔记本评测。以优异的成绩通过

在FPS的狩猎中。 对于它的Raider GE66 12UHS,微星全力以赴,为笔记本电脑配备了英特尔酷睿i9-12900HK,RTX 3080 Ti,120赫兹4K面板和创新的冷却。我们对这个15英寸的高端巨无霸进行了测试,看看它是否能够满足最新的游戏需求。
Alder Lake Gaming Geforce Intel Laptop / Notebook Windows

微星公司继续扩大其高端游戏笔记本的品种。通过GE66 12UHS,这家台湾公司的目标是利用英特尔酷睿i9 12900HK的强大功能。英特尔Core i9 12900HK和Nvidia RTX 3080 Ti的力量,在CPU上的 "相变液态金属垫 "以及改进的散热器的帮助下。虽然整体设计与前代产品(微星GE66 10SFS)相比变化不大。 微星GE66 10SFS),但制造商还是在引擎盖下做了许多调整。

在下面的评论中,我们将了解该设备是否能够跟上竞争者的形式,即 Razer Blade 15 Advanced Early 2022,以及 申克XMG Neo 15 Early 2022联想Legion 5 Pro 16 G7.

MSI Raider GE66 12UHS (GE66 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i9-12900HK 14 x 2.918 GHz @ 5 GHz, 200 W PL2 / Short Burst, 45 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-P
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU - 16384 MB, Core: 1400 MHz, Memory: 2000 MHz, 150 W TDP ( including 15 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, MUX-Switch, Advanced-Optimus
Memory
32768 MB 
, DDR5-4800 MHz
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 282 PPI, AUO51EB, IPS, glossy: no, 120 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, 2048 GB 
, 1940 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
4 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: Audio combo, Card Reader: SD, Brightness Sensor
Networking
Killer E3100G 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 23.4 x 358 x 267
Battery
99 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Camera
Webcam: 1080p
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix Full-HD 30 FPS
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, MSI Center, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.436 kg, Power Supply: 838 g
Price
4499 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
87.4 %
06/2022
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.4 kg23.4 mm15.60"3840x2160
84.6 %
12/2020
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
2.4 kg23 mm15.60"1920x1080
89.1 %
03/2022
Razer Blade 15 2022
i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.1 kg16.99 mm15.60"2560x1440
03/2022
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.2 kg26.6 mm15.60"2560x1440
88 %
03/2022
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.6 kg26.6 mm16.00"2560x1600

与其他游戏笔记本相比,我们的评测设备的重量是第二高的(2.4公斤)。就尺寸而言,GE66更像是一个笔记本巨人。Razer Blade展示了在移动性方面的可能性。

尺寸比较

360.2 mm 243.5 mm 26.6 mm 2.2 kg359.9 mm 264.4 mm 26.6 mm 2.6 kg358 mm 267 mm 23.4 mm 2.4 kg358 mm 267 mm 23 mm 2.4 kg355 mm 235 mm 16.99 mm 2.1 kg

连接性。升级为现代端口

所有的端口位置也保持不变,相对于微星GE66 10SFS。.只有背面的USB-C端口升级为Thunderbolt 4,而左侧的USB-C 3.2端口现在支持DisplayPort功能。

SD卡阅读器

在使用我们的AV PRO V60 microSD参考卡的测试中,SD读卡器的性能没有达到预期。只有 申克XMG Neo 15 Early 2022在比较领域表现得更差。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
190 MB/s ∼100% +144%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
165.4 MB/s ∼87% +112%
Average of class Gaming
  (18 - 222, n=95, last 2 years)
116.1 MB/s ∼61% +49%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
78 MB/s ∼41%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
68.3 (65.41min - 69.52max) MB/s ∼36% -12%

沟通

我们的评测设备在Wi-Fi性能方面名列前茅,并显示出优秀的速率,只是刚刚被超越了。Razer Blade 15 Advanced Early 2022.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
1621 (1412min - 1672max) MBit/s ∼100% 0%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1617 (831min - 1687max) MBit/s ∼100%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
 
1617 MBit/s ∼100% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (851 - 1695, n=16, last 2 years)
1451 MBit/s ∼90% -10%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
1727 (866min - 1759max) MBit/s ∼100% +1%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1714 (1600min - 1749max) MBit/s ∼99%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
  (1569 - 1714, n=3)
1661 MBit/s ∼96% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (787 - 1748, n=20, last 2 years)
1581 MBit/s ∼92% -8%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1713 (1600-1749)
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1589 (831-1687)

网络摄像头

网络摄像头提供全高清,为笔记本网络摄像头提供体面的图像。虽然在低光照条件下,这些图像往往是嘈杂和模糊的,但总体图像质量应该足以满足日常任务,如视频会议。

ColorChecker
11.9 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
13 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
15 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
ColorChecker MSI Raider GE66 12UHS: 11.37 ∆E min: 5.47 - max: 19.27 ∆E

辅料

除笔记本外,交货范围包括设备的必要文件以及电源适配器。与其前身的280瓦一样,没有变化的电源仍然为所安装的硬件提供足够的电力。

维护

在2022年,服务支持并不总是每个设备都有的。一些制造商故意让那些想自己维护设备的用户感到困难。例如,戴尔在其Alienware笔记本电脑中从后往前安装主板(风扇和散热器在键盘的正下方,难以接近)。那些想要更换导热垫或浆糊的人因此面临着一个繁琐的程序。

我们的MSI Raider GE66 12 UHS不是这种情况,唯一有难度的任务是拆下11颗十字螺丝来拆开底板。这也适用于显示屏后面的塑料盖。对于那些感兴趣的人,下面有一个小系列的照片,显示了如何在不损坏敏感塑料部件的情况下进入微星突袭者GE66 12 UHS的内部工作。

一旦你取下顶盖和底壳,你就可以直接接触到两个PCI Gen 4插槽。你还可以更换Wi-Fi卡,清洁风扇,如果有必要,可以更换冷却系统和SO-DIMM模块,这些模块位于被动冷却块下面。

除了图片中标有黑色箭头的一个螺丝外,所有11个螺丝的长度都一样。
必须首先拆除显示器后面的银色塑料盖。在这里显示的位置,这更容易完成。
通过几个夹子固定。银色的塑料盖,用spudger(防静电铲子)比较容易取下。
用前面提到的刮刀(或平挑)从上到下,一步一步地松开下层外壳。
在进行最后一步之前,将两边的夹子松开,一直到底部。
小心地将笔记本放在侧面位置,显示器略微打开,以释放最后的固定装置(标有箭头)。
微星GE66 12 UHS的内部工作原理
微星GE66 12 UHS的内部工作原理

担保

与上一代产品一样,微星给予Raider GE66 24个月的保修期,并提供提货和退货服务。这只适用于德国,所以其他国家的保修政策可能有所不同。需要注意的是,保修封条对于德语国家来说没有意义,因为用户可以打开设备进行升级和维护,而不会导致保修失效。然而,这只适用于专业工作的条件。如果损坏或缺陷表明工作不是专业进行的,这可能导致保修无效。此外,如果需要维修,设备必须恢复到原来的配置,因为维修时可能需要更换部件,而微星要求使用原始部件。

输入设备。优秀的游戏键盘,带有光滑的光条

与微星GE66 10SFS相比,键盘和布局以及触摸板都没有改变。因此,我们再次向您推荐的是 前任 模型。

值得一提的一点是灯条,它被放大了,在机箱和前面为RGB风扇提供了更多照明。照明看起来也更令人愉快,质量更高。

微星GE66 12UHS:灯条的前视图
微星GE66 12UHS:灯条的前视图
微星GE66 12UHS:从上面看灯条
微星GE66 12UHS:从上面看灯条

显示器。4K面板,120赫兹

子像素网格
子像素网格
光环
光环

微星在Raider GE66 12UHS中安装了刷新率为120赫兹的非反射式IPS面板,它具有4K分辨率,主观上看起来非常出色。4K面板是否适用于15英寸的显示器是值得商榷的:对于那些同时喜欢游戏的专业用户来说,这绝对是一个优势。除此之外,所安装的硬件属于绝对的高端范围,其配置绝对可以在4K分辨率下流畅地运行游戏。微星还提供替代方案,从240赫兹或165赫兹的QHD面板开始(每种情况下都有100%的DCI-P3覆盖率),直到360赫兹的全高清面板。

将评测设备中的4K显示屏的数值与前代产品中的FHD面板(240赫兹)的数值相比较,出现了以下情况。GE66 12UHS的4K面板亮度提高了20%,达到347 cd/m²,并提供了更高的色彩空间覆盖率,DCI-P3为80.4%,而AdobeRGB为68%,AdobeRGB为94.7%,而AdobeRGB为69.8%。带有4K显示屏的评测设备不使用PWM,尽管前代产品只在非常高的频率下有这个功能。然而,也有一些缺点,如较高的响应时间和较差的黑色和对比度值。

327
cd/m²
347
cd/m²
331
cd/m²
344
cd/m²
351
cd/m²
353
cd/m²
356
cd/m²
364
cd/m²
353
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AUO51EB
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 364 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 347.3 cd/m² Minimum: 19 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 351 cd/m²
Contrast: 1003:1 (Black: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.54 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4, calibrated: 0.67
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
94.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
80.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.089
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
AUO51EB, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 15.60
Razer Blade 15 2022
Sharp LQ156T1JW03, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
BOE0A67 (BOE CQ NE156QHM-NZ1), IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
NE160QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Display
-13%
6%
-14%
Display P3 Coverage
80.4
68
-15%
99.1
23%
68.7
-15%
sRGB Coverage
98.4
99
1%
99.9
2%
97.6
-1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
94.7
69.8
-26%
86.8
-8%
70.9
-25%
Response Times
16%
16%
20%
24%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
18.8 ?(9.2, 9.6)
16.4 ?(6.8, 7.6)
13%
14.4 ?(6.8, 7.6)
23%
14.4 ?(6.6, 7.8)
23%
17.6 ?(9.2, 8.4)
6%
Response Time Black / White *
12.8 ?(6.8, 6)
10.4 ?(6, 4.4)
19%
11.6 ?(5.6, 6)
9%
10.8 ?(5.4, 5.4)
16%
7.6 ?(2.4, 5.2)
41%
PWM Frequency
23580 ?(19)
Screen
23%
-19%
4%
9%
Brightness middle
351
291
-17%
286
-19%
295
-16%
502
43%
Brightness
347
278
-20%
271
-22%
277
-20%
491
41%
Brightness Distribution
90
91
1%
89
-1%
62
-31%
91
1%
Black Level *
0.35
0.25
29%
0.25
29%
0.28
20%
0.37
-6%
Contrast
1003
1164
16%
1144
14%
1054
5%
1357
35%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.54
1.19
53%
2.74
-8%
2.36
7%
2.7
-6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.36
3.04
64%
5.21
38%
4.24
49%
4.5
46%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.67
2.52
-276%
1.4
-109%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.1
1.9
54%
1.1
73%
3.43
16%
2.7
34%
Gamma
2.089 105%
2.216 99%
2.2 100%
2.44 90%
2.44 90%
CCT
7036 92%
7018 93%
6408 101%
6266 104%
6326 103%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
70
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
92
Total Average (Program / Settings)
9% / 13%
1% / -9%
12% / 7%
6% / 6%

* ... smaller is better

显示屏的颜色精度可以得到改善,特别是灰度。在用光谱仪校准后,我们取得了非常好的平均灰度和色彩DeltaE值,分别为0.8和0.67。我们校准的ICC档案可在 在这里下载。

卡尔曼:灰度
卡尔曼:灰度
卡尔曼:色彩饱和度
卡尔曼:色彩饱和度
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN:灰度(校准的)。
CalMAN:灰度(校准的)。
CalMAN:色彩饱和度(已校准)。
CalMAN:色彩饱和度(已校准)。
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)


MSI Raider GE66 12UHS vs sRGB
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS vs sRGB
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS vs P3
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS vs P3
微星科技突袭者GE66 12UHS VS AdobeRGB
微星科技突袭者GE66 12UHS VS AdobeRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
12.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
18.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.2 ms rise
↘ 9.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (36.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21764 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

即使拥有不反光的显示屏和347cd/m²的亮度,我们也不能推荐雷蛇GE66 12UHS在阳光直射下使用,至少在没有微星真彩的情况下工作。通过这个工具及其多样化的设置,显示内容的可读性可以得到一定程度的改善。但就整体户外使用而言,你应该寻找一个阴凉的地方以获得最佳条件。

我们评测设备的内置IPS面板,即使从极广的角度看,也能保持视角稳定。亮度保持不变,颜色也不会失真。

微星GE66 12UHS:直射光下的显示效果
微星GE66 12UHS:直射光下的显示效果
由于采用了IPS,即使在极端的视角下也能获得真实的色彩
由于采用了IPS,即使在极端的视角下也能获得真实的色彩

性能。微星GE66 12UHS巧妙的液态金属冷却解决方案

微星GE66 12UHS有多种配置。因此,你可以购买带有以下配置的系统 英特尔酷睿i7 12700H而不是英特尔酷睿i9 12900HK。关于GPU配置,该系统可以选择配备8GB VRAM和150瓦TDP(总动态功率)的RTX 3080,也可以选择配备16GB VRAM和同样具有150瓦TDP的RTX 3080 Ti。这两种配置都使用16GB DDR5内存,频率为4800MHz,或32GB DDR5内存,频率相同,都以双通道模式运行。固态硬盘安装在1TB或2TB的尺寸中。

我们的审查设备是最高端版本,配备了 英特尔酷睿i9 12900HK,RTX 3080 Ti和32GB DDR5内存,由2TB固态硬盘完成。

CPU-Z CPU
CPU-Z CPU
CPU-Z 主板
CPU-Z 主板
CPU-Z内存
CPU-Z内存
CPU-Z SPD
CPU-Z SPD
CPU-Z图形
CPU-Z图形
GPU-Z 英特尔
GPU-Z 英特尔
gpu-z nvidia rtx
gpu-z nvidia rtx
HWiNFO
HWiNFO

测试条件

为了获得最佳的基准测试结果,我们通过微星中心将笔记本电脑设置为 "极限性能 "模式(否则设置为 "智能自动 "为默认设置)。许多重要的系统设置可以通过该平台进行调整(无需创建账户)。这些包括风扇配置文件以及一般设置和其他功能,如用于寻找最新系统驱动程序的 "实时更新"。不幸的是,并非所有的驱动程序都能自动安装,有些必须手动安装。我们还喜欢在 "独立图形模式"(仅RTX 3080 Ti)或 "MSHybrid图形模式"(Advanced-Optimus)下运行GPU的选项,不仅可以节省电池寿命,还可以使用雷电4视频输出,因为这在 "独立图形模式 "下是禁用的。在每种情况下都需要重新启动系统。

我们观察到几个缺点,在MSI中心启动时偶尔会有很长的等待时间,它也经常无缘无故地崩溃,而且在我们的评测设备中,"硬件监控 "工具不断冻结。

微星中心一般设置
微星中心一般设置
微星中心一般设置
微星中心一般设置
MSI-中心硬件监控
MSI-中心硬件监控
微星中心的功能:概述
微星中心的功能:概述

处理器

为了保持强大的处理器冷却,微星安装了一个 "相变液态金属垫",它在58摄氏度以下保持固态,当超过这个温度时就会液化。
为了保持强大的处理器冷却,微星安装了一个 "相变液态金属垫",它在58摄氏度以下保持固态,当超过这个温度时就会液化。

我们的评测设备使用的是英特尔酷睿i9 12900HK。 是英特尔最强大的移动CPU之一,与即将发布的 英特尔酷睿i9 12950HX。英特尔酷睿i9 12900HK有14个核心(20个线程),6个性能核心和8个效率核心,提供高达5GHz的涡轮增压和24MB L3缓存。

在具有自动风扇控制的Cinebench R23基准测试以及 "极端性能 "配置文件中,CPU在被热控之前短暂地消耗了86瓦特。在这种情况下,多核基准测试的最高得分是16236分。在相同条件下,在电池模式下,这一分数下降到12,729分。如果你把性能和风扇控制留给 "智能自动模式 "中的AI(人工智能),分数只略微增加到16,533分,CPU短暂消耗90瓦而不是86瓦。如果你在 "极限性能 "配置文件中把风扇模式改为 "冷却器提升",你将达到近17,000分和92瓦的峰值负载,但你必须忍受高得多的噪音。

微星为所安装的处理器配备了一个 "相变液态金属垫",其功能是作为固体形式的热传导垫,直到它在58摄氏度时融化并变成液态金属,然后据说可以显著改善高温下的热传导性。

我们的测试结果。即使使用液态金属,这台15英寸的电脑也没有完全发挥出其英特尔酷睿i9 12900HK的潜力,甚至被英特尔酷睿i7 12700H的某些对比设备。微星GE66 12UHS的老大哥,即 GE76 12UHS在我们的Cinebench R15多重持续负载测试中,同样的CPU也 "只 "得到了2722分。在我们的 联想Legion 5 Pro 16 G7Schenker Neo 15都采用了12700H处理器,性能超过了GE66和更大的MSI GE76 12UHS。与前者相比,采用英特尔 Core i9 10980HK相比,我们的评测设备的性能还是有了超过50%的显著提升。

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

01503004506007509001050120013501500165018001950210022502400255027002850Tooltip
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø2467 (2423.65-2668.98)
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK: Ø1610 (1581.15-1708.45)
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H: Ø2081 (2061.43-2178.41)
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2766 (2740.48-2824.46)
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2829 (2783-2902.76)
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
82.9 pt ∼83%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
82 pt ∼82%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
80.8 pt ∼81%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK
 
72.9 pt ∼73%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
72.1 pt ∼72%
Average of class Gaming
 
56.8 pt ∼57%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS -2!
Intel Core i9-10980HK
50.7 pt ∼51%
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
19250 Points ∼100% +16%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
18452 Points ∼96% +12%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
16530 Points ∼86%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK
  (4796 - 19282, n=10)
16361 Points ∼85% -1%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
14893 (13078min - 14893.1max) Points ∼77% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 23124, n=175, last 2 years)
12413 Points ∼64% -25%
Single Core
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1855 Points ∼100%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
1819 Points ∼98% -2%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
1796 Points ∼97% -3%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
1782 Points ∼96% -4%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK
  (819 - 1940, n=10)
1703 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 1920, n=174, last 2 years)
1494 Points ∼81% -19%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
7382 Points ∼100% +18%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
6988 Points ∼95% +11%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
6271 Points ∼85%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK
  (1828 - 7366, n=10)
6231 Points ∼84% -1%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
5731 Points ∼78% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 8828, n=230, last 2 years)
4446 Points ∼60% -29%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
3843 Points ∼52% -39%
CPU (Single Core)
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
717 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
696 Points ∼97% -3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
696 Points ∼97% -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
690 Points ∼96% -4%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK
  (316 - 739, n=10)
644 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 742, n=230, last 2 years)
555 Points ∼77% -23%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
476 Points ∼66% -34%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
2903 (2783min - 2902.76max) Points ∼100% +9%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
2824 (2740.48min - 2824.46max) Points ∼97% +6%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
2669 (2423.65min - 2668.98max) Points ∼92%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK
  (965 - 2944, n=10)
2467 Points ∼85% -8%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
2178 (2061.43min - 2178.41max) Points ∼75% -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 3562, n=239, last 2 years)
1873 Points ∼65% -30%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1708 (1581.15min - 1708.45max) Points ∼59% -36%
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
267 Points ∼100%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
263 Points ∼99% -1%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
261 Points ∼98% -2%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
258 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK
  (119 - 279, n=10)
244 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 280, n=229, last 2 years)
222 Points ∼83% -17%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
206 Points ∼77% -23%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (150.5 - 1259, n=229, last 2 years)
295 Seconds * ∼100% -51%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
278 Seconds * ∼94% -42%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
226 Seconds * ∼77% -15%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK
  (172.5 - 483, n=9)
216 Seconds * ∼73% -10%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
195.9 Seconds * ∼66%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
177 Seconds * ∼60% +10%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
171 Seconds * ∼58% +13%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
73067 MIPS ∼100% +6%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
70903 MIPS ∼97% +3%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
69083 MIPS ∼95%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK
  (25736 - 75564, n=10)
65276 MIPS ∼89% -6%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
61936 MIPS ∼85% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 86541, n=229, last 2 years)
50148 MIPS ∼69% -27%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
46976 MIPS ∼64% -32%
7z b 4 -mmt1
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
5981 MIPS ∼100%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
5835 MIPS ∼98% -2%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
5775 MIPS ∼97% -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
5726 MIPS ∼96% -4%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK
  (2898 - 6186, n=10)
5471 MIPS ∼91% -9%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
5463 MIPS ∼91% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 6582, n=229, last 2 years)
5419 MIPS ∼91% -9%
Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
13745 Points ∼100% 0%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
13722 Points ∼100%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
12981 Points ∼94% -5%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
12434 Points ∼90% -9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK
  (5869 - 14294, n=10)
12053 Points ∼88% -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 16448, n=222, last 2 years)
8497 Points ∼62% -38%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
8104 Points ∼59% -41%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1861 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
1784 Points ∼96% -4%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
1758 Points ∼94% -6%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
1746 Points ∼94% -6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK
  (843 - 1918, n=10)
1679 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 1949, n=222, last 2 years)
1454 Points ∼78% -22%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1352 Points ∼73% -27%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
21.4 fps ∼100% +16%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
20.9 fps ∼98% +14%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
18.4 fps ∼86%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK
  (5.33 - 21.6, n=10)
18 fps ∼84% -2%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
17.2 fps ∼80% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 26, n=231, last 2 years)
14 fps ∼65% -24%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
13 fps ∼61% -29%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
53.4 s * ∼100% -47%
Average of class Gaming
  (23.9 - 332, n=227, last 2 years)
53.1 s * ∼99% -46%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
51.5 s * ∼96% -42%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK
  (34.8 - 89.1, n=10)
46.1 s * ∼86% -27%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
42.9 s * ∼80% -18%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
42.1 s * ∼79% -16%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
36.3 s * ∼68%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
0.564 sec * ∼100% -28%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.412 - 4.47, n=227, last 2 years)
0.564 sec * ∼100% -28%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK
  (0.4155 - 0.994, n=10)
0.509 sec * ∼90% -16%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
0.4715 sec * ∼84% -7%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4553 sec * ∼81% -4%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4495 sec * ∼80% -2%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
0.4392 sec * ∼78%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2669 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
248 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
267 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
88.1 pt ∼88%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
85.6 pt ∼86%
Average of class Gaming
 
84.1 pt ∼84%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
83.5 pt ∼84%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
81.8 pt ∼82%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK
 
78.4 pt ∼78%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
73.5 pt ∼74%
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
12479 KRay/s ∼100% +46%
Average of class Gaming
  (2585 - 20004, n=184, last 2 years)
11357 KRay/s ∼91% +33%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9576 KRay/s ∼77% +12%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9537 KRay/s ∼76% +12%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
8538 KRay/s ∼68%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK
  (2677 - 9759, n=10)
8167 KRay/s ∼65% -4%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
7671 KRay/s ∼61% -10%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average of class Gaming
  (12439 - 117712, n=184, last 2 years)
61554 Points ∼100% +59%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
61078 Points ∼99% +58%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
41732 Points ∼68% +8%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
41712 Points ∼68% +8%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
38656 Points ∼63%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK
  (12762 - 43695, n=10)
37339 Points ∼61% -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
36695 Points ∼60% -5%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3442 MB/s ∼100% +15%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3343 MB/s ∼97% +12%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2992 MB/s ∼87%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK
  (841 - 3504, n=10)
2884 MB/s ∼84% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (629 - 5123, n=184, last 2 years)
2863 MB/s ∼83% -4%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
2840 MB/s ∼83% -5%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2681 MB/s ∼78% -10%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
105314 Points ∼100%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
99671 Points ∼95% -5%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK
  (60202 - 107161, n=10)
99249 Points ∼94% -6%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
97871 Points ∼93% -7%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
93558 Points ∼89% -11%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
93492 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (15371 - 132615, n=184, last 2 years)
89428 Points ∼85% -15%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
10338 Points ∼100% +7%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9928 Points ∼96% +3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9928 Points ∼96% +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (2137 - 17639, n=184, last 2 years)
9908 Points ∼96% +3%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9652 Points ∼93%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9205 Points ∼89% -5%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK
  (3225 - 10402, n=10)
9156 Points ∼89% -5%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average of class Gaming
  (7135 - 64776, n=184, last 2 years)
33535 Points ∼100% +45%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
31109 Points ∼93% +35%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
27081 Points ∼81% +17%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
26824 Points ∼80% +16%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
23070 Points ∼69%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK
  (7417 - 27285, n=10)
22755 Points ∼68% -1%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
21312 Points ∼64% -8%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
102398 MB/s ∼100% +8%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
95126 MB/s ∼93%
Average of class Gaming
  (11368 - 183146, n=184, last 2 years)
78108 MB/s ∼76% -18%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK
  (32382 - 106367, n=10)
77267 MB/s ∼75% -19%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
67282 MB/s ∼66% -29%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
55775 MB/s ∼54% -41%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
39085 MB/s ∼38% -59%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
1158 MB/s ∼100% +10%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
1156 MB/s ∼100% +9%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
1056 MB/s ∼91%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK
  (314 - 1209, n=10)
1006 MB/s ∼87% -5%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
928 MB/s ∼80% -12%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
712 MB/s ∼61% -33%
Average of class Gaming
  (150.9 - 1393, n=205, last 2 years)
697 MB/s ∼60% -34%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
6900 KRay/s ∼100% +40%
Average of class Gaming
  (1437 - 10864, n=184, last 2 years)
6164 KRay/s ∼89% +25%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
5742 KRay/s ∼83% +17%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
5597 KRay/s ∼81% +14%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
4924 KRay/s ∼71%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK
  (1501 - 5748, n=10)
4767 KRay/s ∼69% -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
4173 KRay/s ∼60% -15%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40992 MPixel/s ∼100% +1%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40648 MPixel/s ∼99%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40524 MPixel/s ∼99% 0%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK
  (24991 - 40648, n=10)
37758 MPixel/s ∼92% -7%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
33458 MPixel/s ∼82% -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (8341 - 47710, n=184, last 2 years)
24832 MPixel/s ∼61% -39%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
22547 MPixel/s ∼55% -45%

系统性能

正如预期的那样,系统性能原来是很高的。我们的微星GE66 12UHS与竞争对手擦肩而过,并在所有测试类别中显示出卓越的性能。

PCMark 10
PCMark 10
PCMark 10 / Score
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8178 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (7149 - 8186, n=5)
7867 Points ∼96% -4%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7706 Points ∼94% -6%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7555 Points ∼92% -8%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
7240 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (4077 - 8186, n=189, last 2 years)
6554 Points ∼80% -20%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
6053 Points ∼74% -26%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
11078 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (9870 - 11205, n=5)
10757 Points ∼97% -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
10708 Points ∼97% -3%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
10070 Points ∼91% -9%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10004 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (7148 - 11205, n=188, last 2 years)
9857 Points ∼89% -11%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
9813 Points ∼89% -11%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10422 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (9173 - 10422, n=5)
9978 Points ∼96% -4%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9875 Points ∼95% -5%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
9581 Points ∼92% -8%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
8944 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (6161 - 10638, n=188, last 2 years)
8754 Points ∼84% -16%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
7641 Points ∼73% -27%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
12857 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (10951 - 13098, n=5)
12318 Points ∼96% -4%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
12104 Points ∼94% -6%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
11849 Points ∼92% -8%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
11434 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (3670 - 13098, n=188, last 2 years)
8974 Points ∼70% -30%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
8029 Points ∼62% -38%
CrossMark / Overall
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1955 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (970 - 2138, n=5)
1770 Points ∼91%
Average of class Gaming
  (974 - 2169, n=34, last 2 years)
1761 Points ∼90%
CrossMark / Productivity
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1869 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (907 - 2062, n=34, last 2 years)
1708 Points ∼91%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (921 - 2038, n=5)
1677 Points ∼90%
CrossMark / Creativity
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2050 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1007 - 2210, n=5)
1892 Points ∼92%
Average of class Gaming
  (1027 - 2328, n=34, last 2 years)
1846 Points ∼90%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1940 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1012 - 2234, n=5)
1722 Points ∼89%
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 2230, n=34, last 2 years)
1691 Points ∼87%
PCMark 10 Score
8178 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65103 MB/s ∼100% +3%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
62959 MB/s ∼97%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
62522 MB/s ∼96% -1%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK
  (53861 - 62959, n=10)
61185 MB/s ∼94% -3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
51726 MB/s ∼79% -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (18074 - 77803, n=184, last 2 years)
43495 MB/s ∼67% -31%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
38498 MB/s ∼59% -39%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
66798 MB/s ∼100%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
66265 MB/s ∼99% -1%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65933 MB/s ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK
  (57237 - 66989, n=10)
64617 MB/s ∼97% -3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
59324 MB/s ∼89% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (20318 - 76185, n=184, last 2 years)
47251 MB/s ∼71% -29%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
44246 MB/s ∼66% -34%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
66074 MB/s ∼100% +2%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65495 MB/s ∼99% +1%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65001 MB/s ∼98%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK
  (54443 - 65268, n=10)
62713 MB/s ∼95% -4%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
58630 MB/s ∼89% -10%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
46027 MB/s ∼70% -29%
Average of class Gaming
  (15975 - 67353, n=184, last 2 years)
45348 MB/s ∼69% -30%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
96.9 ns * ∼100% -3%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
93.7 ns * ∼97%
Average of class Gaming
  (83.9 - 122, n=207, last 2 years)
60.7 ns * ∼63% +35%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK
  (98.4 - 109, n=10)
57.5 (98.4min - 109max) ns * ∼59% +39%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
55.2 ns * ∼57% +41%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
0 ns * ∼0% +100%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
0 ns * ∼0% +100%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

对DPC延迟的测试显示,我们的评测设备不适合用目前的驱动和系统软件进行实时视频处理。在YouTube 4K视频和实时音频处理中都发现了延迟问题。

延迟监测
延迟监测
延迟监测驱动程序
延迟监测驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5785 μs * ∼100%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1364 μs * ∼24% +76%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
935 μs * ∼16% +84%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
808 μs * ∼14% +86%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
748 μs * ∼13% +87%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

安装在我们系统中的2TB固态硬盘(代号为PM9A1,与三星Evo 980 Pro的OEM对应产品)提供了非常好的性能,仅次于同样的1TB版本的固态硬盘,后者也安装于联想的Legion 5 Pro 16 G7.然而,我们的磁盘速度基准显示,在整个测试期间,性能大幅下降,持续不断。我们在对华硕ROG Strix Scar 15的审查中也观察到了同样的问题。 华硕ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW。中也观察到了同样的问题,该产品配备了相同的固态硬盘。微星公司已经被告知这个问题。

有两个原因:主要原因是固件的问题,无法通过Windows或MSI支持页面自动解决。对于过时的固件(版本:GXB7401Q),现在有一个修复方法,你可以通过命令提示更新到当前的版本(GXB7601Q)。不幸的是,该驱动程序不能通过设备管理器安装。进一步研究发现,这是256GB、512GB、1TB和2TB格式的三星PM9A1的一个著名问题。

在较长的持续负载期间,SDD性能下降的第二个原因是由于其被动冷却。即使在 "冷却器提升模式 "下也不能充分冷却,因此作为固态硬盘核心的三星Elpis S4LV003控制器从74摄氏度开始就会出现节流现象。有经验的用户如果有足够的信心打开他们的设备,也许可以通过在被动冷却板下面放置一个良好的固态硬盘热垫来补救这个问题。

在下面的一系列图片中,我们向你展示如何在不损失数据的情况下安装更新。该固件可以在这里下载https://drive.google.com/file/d/1iV9SEqyyt5LlOFUdj56w_SDM6yHUbYKq/view来源: :Reddit。 注意。刷新固件的风险由你自己承担。

更新前的磁盘速度循环基准。
更新后的磁盘速度循环基准。
第一步:通过Crystal Disk Info检查你的Samung PM9A1固件是否过期。
第二步:下载固件,并根据你的SSD尺寸选择正确的固件进行解压。
第3步:将 "update "文件夹的内容直接提取到C盘。
第4步:文件现在直接位于C盘,以确保更容易闪电。
第5步:以管理员身份启动命令提示符并输入命令。CD C:/导航到所需的文件,用Enter确认。
第6步:输入命令。SSDManager.exe,然后用Enter确认。
第7步:该程序应如图所示启动。
第8步:在命令提示符下,检查DiskPath号码是否为0:如果不是,必须使用文本编辑器调整Flash.CMD文件(见图片中的说明)。
第9步:如果现在DiskPath号码是正确的,输入命令LIST,用Enter确认。
第10步。输入FLASH命令,用回车键确认。
第11步:用 "是 "确认闪存过程,并点击回车。闪存后,"成功 "应出现两次。重新启动电脑。
第12步:在固件更新和重启后,打开Crystal Disk Info,你现在应该可以看到新的固件。
 
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 4032.16 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3980.93 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 960.46 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 713.07 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 91.87 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 279.15 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 4986.1 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 6678.59 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
95.6 pt ∼96%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
90.8 pt ∼91%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
 
82.5 pt ∼83%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
81.4 pt ∼81%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
70.5 pt ∼71%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
56.1 pt ∼56%
Average of class Gaming
 
51.5 pt ∼52%
DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4486 (4475.68min - 4485.6max) MB/s ∼100% +18%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4119 (4098.66min - 4118.81max) MB/s ∼92% +8%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3813 (3795.59min - 3813.38max) MB/s ∼85%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (2376 - 4645, n=14)
3684 MB/s ∼82% -3%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
3225 (3206.01min - 3225.21max) MB/s ∼72% -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (170 - 5544, n=186, last 2 years)
2398 MB/s ∼53% -37%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2333 (2329.26min - 2333.08max) MB/s ∼52% -39%
seq write
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4368 (4353.59min - 4368.3max) MB/s ∼100% +14%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4167 (4120.63min - 4166.62max) MB/s ∼95% +9%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (2461 - 4574, n=14)
3859 MB/s ∼88% +1%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3838 (3792.07min - 3837.66max) MB/s ∼88%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
2661 (2641.11min - 2661max) MB/s ∼61% -31%
Average of class Gaming
  (174 - 7889, n=185, last 2 years)
2605 MB/s ∼60% -32%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2296 (2010.29min - 2296.19max) MB/s ∼53% -40%
seq q8 t1 read
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
6921 (6631.14min - 6921.02max) MB/s ∼100% +29%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6637 (6082.37min - 6637.28max) MB/s ∼96% +24%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (3471 - 7090, n=14)
6381 MB/s ∼92% +19%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5358 (3289.72min - 5358.22max) MB/s ∼77%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
4536 (4257.18min - 4536.14max) MB/s ∼66% -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 13195, n=186, last 2 years)
3965 MB/s ∼57% -26%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
3403 (3187.38min - 3402.84max) MB/s ∼49% -36%
seq q8 t1 write
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4951 (4919.31min - 4950.75max) MB/s ∼100%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4940 (4909.85min - 4939.63max) MB/s ∼100% 0%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (3537 - 5263, n=14)
4880 MB/s ∼99% -1%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4740 (4542.15min - 4740.19max) MB/s ∼96% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (86.2 - 10203, n=186, last 2 years)
3144 MB/s ∼64% -36%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
3052 (3015.29min - 3052.4max) MB/s ∼62% -38%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
2665 (2644.09min - 2664.64max) MB/s ∼54% -46%
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
97.4 (97.34min - 97.43max) MB/s ∼100% +10%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
89.7 (89.47min - 89.72max) MB/s ∼92% +2%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
88.3 (86.45min - 88.29max) MB/s ∼91%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
79.6 (78.85min - 79.63max) MB/s ∼82% -10%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (56.2 - 91.2, n=14)
78.9 MB/s ∼81% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.53 - 97.4, n=186, last 2 years)
56.7 MB/s ∼58% -36%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
51.6 (51.46min - 51.58max) MB/s ∼53% -42%
4k q1 t1 write
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
274 (272.01min - 273.96max) MB/s ∼100% 0%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
273 (271.29min - 273.19max) MB/s ∼100%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
256 (23.49min - 256.28max) MB/s ∼93% -6%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (134 - 295, n=14)
232 MB/s ∼85% -15%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
223 (222.49min - 223.25max) MB/s ∼81% -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.79 - 421, n=185, last 2 years)
172.7 MB/s ∼63% -37%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
160 (159.46min - 159.7max) MB/s ∼58% -41%
4k q32 t16 read
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4158 (4151.05min - 4157.8max) MB/s ∼100% +2%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4068 (4061.36min - 4067.74max) MB/s ∼98%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (756 - 4075, n=14)
3513 MB/s ∼84% -14%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3184 (3180.75min - 3183.86max) MB/s ∼77% -22%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
2272 (2266.88min - 2271.97max) MB/s ∼55% -44%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2267 (2262.76min - 2267.13max) MB/s ∼55% -44%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.1 - 4198, n=185, last 2 years)
1813 MB/s ∼44% -55%
4k q32 t16 write
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3544 (3518.93min - 3543.6max) MB/s ∼100% +2%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3478 (3426.38min - 3478.07max) MB/s ∼98%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (422 - 3531, n=14)
2626 MB/s ∼74% -24%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
2613 (2594.87min - 2613.35max) MB/s ∼74% -25%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2248 (1804.11min - 2248.38max) MB/s ∼63% -35%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2141 (2137.08min - 2141.26max) MB/s ∼60% -38%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.15 - 4249, n=185, last 2 years)
1786 MB/s ∼50% -49%
AS SSD
Score Total
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9094 Points ∼100% +2%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8959 Points ∼99%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (5229 - 9031, n=14)
7920 Points ∼87% -12%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7659 Points ∼84% -15%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
6267 Points ∼69% -30%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
5673 Points ∼62% -37%
Average of class Gaming
  (910 - 9279, n=177, last 2 years)
5288 Points ∼58% -41%
Score Read
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3431 Points ∼100% +3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3380 Points ∼99% +1%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3341 Points ∼97%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (1648 - 3399, n=14)
2985 Points ∼87% -11%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
2462 Points ∼72% -26%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2055 Points ∼60% -38%
Average of class Gaming
  (389 - 3587, n=177, last 2 years)
1971 Points ∼57% -41%
Score Write
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4043 Points ∼100% +2%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3977 Points ∼98%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (1081 - 3999, n=14)
3481 Points ∼86% -12%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
2661 Points ∼66% -33%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2586 Points ∼64% -35%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2563 Points ∼63% -36%
Average of class Gaming
  (335 - 4414, n=177, last 2 years)
2328 Points ∼58% -41%
Seq Read
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
5750 MB/s ∼100% +13%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (2591 - 5615, n=14)
5117 MB/s ∼89% 0%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5098.97 MB/s ∼89%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5036 MB/s ∼88% -1%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
5022 MB/s ∼87% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (252 - 6562, n=177, last 2 years)
3223 MB/s ∼56% -37%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2979 MB/s ∼52% -42%
Seq Write
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4073 MB/s ∼100% +11%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3784 MB/s ∼93% +3%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3667.77 MB/s ∼90%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (1900 - 4434, n=14)
3609 MB/s ∼89% -2%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2581 MB/s ∼63% -30%
Average of class Gaming
  (308 - 7663, n=177, last 2 years)
2491 MB/s ∼61% -32%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
2466 MB/s ∼61% -33%
4K Read
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
88.1 MB/s ∼100% +5%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
84.06 MB/s ∼95%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
80.4 MB/s ∼91% -4%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (52.7 - 84.1, n=14)
73.2 MB/s ∼83% -13%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
67.2 MB/s ∼76% -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (20 - 108, n=177, last 2 years)
55.5 MB/s ∼63% -34%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
47.33 MB/s ∼54% -44%
4K Write
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
244.47 MB/s ∼100%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
240.4 MB/s ∼98% -2%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
221.3 MB/s ∼91% -9%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (112.6 - 249, n=14)
204 MB/s ∼83% -17%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
193.7 MB/s ∼79% -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (18 - 364, n=177, last 2 years)
151.4 MB/s ∼62% -38%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
140 MB/s ∼57% -43%
4K-64 Read
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2789 MB/s ∼100% +2%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2788 MB/s ∼100% +1%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2747.2 MB/s ∼99%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (1232 - 2811, n=14)
2400 MB/s ∼86% -13%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
1880 MB/s ∼67% -32%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
1710 MB/s ∼61% -38%
Average of class Gaming
  (216 - 2959, n=177, last 2 years)
1593 MB/s ∼57% -42%
4K-64 Write
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3424 MB/s ∼100% +2%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3365.94 MB/s ∼98%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (567 - 3414, n=14)
2916 MB/s ∼85% -13%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
2221 MB/s ∼65% -34%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2188 MB/s ∼64% -35%
Average of class Gaming
  (191.8 - 3859, n=177, last 2 years)
1939 MB/s ∼57% -42%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1934 MB/s ∼56% -43%
Access Time Read
Average of class Gaming
  (0.018 - 0.23, n=170, last 2 years)
0.06399 ms * ∼100% -100%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
0.05 ms * ∼78% -56%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (0.018 - 0.068, n=14)
0.03464 ms * ∼54% -8%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.032 ms * ∼50%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
0.025 ms * ∼39% +22%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
0.023 ms * ∼36% +28%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.02 ms * ∼31% +37%
Access Time Write
Average of class Gaming
  (0.012 - 0.588, n=177, last 2 years)
0.06904 ms * ∼100% -284%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
0.058 ms * ∼84% -222%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (0.017 - 0.063, n=14)
0.02743 ms * ∼40% -52%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
0.026 ms * ∼38% -44%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
0.022 ms * ∼32% -22%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.018 ms * ∼26% -0%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.018 ms * ∼26%

* ... smaller is better

更新前的持续读取:DiskSpd读取循环,队列深度为8

磁盘速度循环--更新前的连续循环
磁盘速度循环--更新前的连续循环

Sustained Read after the update: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

035070010501400175021002450280031503500385042004550490052505600595063006650