Gigabyte A7 X1在审查中。游戏笔记本提供稳定的续航性能

Name: Gigabyte A7 X1
Brand: Gigabyte

AMD-Nvidia的组合。

Gigabyte在A7 X1中结合了一个易于升级的笔记本电脑与强大的AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX和NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070。继续阅读，了解这个有前途的硬件平台在日常游戏使用中能做什么。

Mike Wobker, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), Published 10/19/2021 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Gaming Geforce Windows Ryzen (Zen) Laptop / Notebook

通过Gigabyte G5 KC ，我们最近审查了该制造商的一台笔记本电脑，其价格略低于1,000欧元（约合1,162美元），但仍然是一个强大的设备。价格在2,400欧元（约合2,789美元）左右，技嘉还提供相当昂贵的型号，如Aero 15 OLED XD 。

我们目前的评测样品在定价方面处于中间位置，约为1800欧元（约2,092美元），配备了AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX和NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070 。它还配备了16GB内存和512GB固态硬盘。

Test device courtesy of Gigabyte DE

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Gigabyte A7 X1

Processor

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX 8 x 3.3 - 4.6 GHz, 65 W PL2 / Short Burst, 54 W PL1 / Sustained, Cezanne-H (Zen 3)

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1560 MHz, RAM: 1750 MHz, 140 W TDP, NVIDIA 471.68, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8

Memory

16 GB

, dual-channel

Display

17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, AU Optronics AUO8E8D, IPS, glossy: no, 144 Hz

Mainboard

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Storage

ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4, 512 GB

, 470 GB free

Soundcard

AMD Raven/Renoir/Van Gogh/Cezanne/Rembrandt/Raphael - HD Audio Controller

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 1x audio, 1x microphone

Networking

Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 34 x 396 x 262

Battery

48.96 Wh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 0.9 MP, 16:9 (1280x720)

Additional features

Speakers: 2x 2W, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

2.53 kg, Power Supply: 692 g

Price

1 Euro

Links

Gigabyte homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
83.2 % v7 ^(old)	10 / 2021	Gigabyte A7 X1 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	2.5 kg	34 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
85 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2021	Medion Erazer Beast X25 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	23 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
85.5 % v7 ^(old)		Medion Erazer Beast X20 i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	2.2 kg	23 mm	17.30"	2560x1440
82.8 % v7 ^(old)	10 / 2021	Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	2.7 kg	26 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
85.1 % v7 ^(old)		Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	2.5 kg	27 mm	17.30"	2560x1440

案例 - 可更换电池的游戏笔记本

技嘉为A7 X1使用了一个塑料外壳，它的制造质量不错，看起来很结实。显示屏可以打开到大约135°的最大角度，并通过铰链牢牢固定在每个位置。底部有宽敞的通风口，电池也在这里，不需要任何工具就可以取出。

在长度和宽度方面，技嘉A7 X1与其他17英寸游戏笔记本电脑没有什么不同。然而，它的厚度明显高于大多数竞争对手，为3.4厘米。

Size comparison

Gigabyte A7 X1 Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Medion Erazer Beast X25 Medion Erazer Beast X20 DIN A4 ❌

连接性 - 笔记本电脑支持连接多个显示器

技嘉A7 X1提供了基本的各种端口。这里值得注意的是背面的USB-C端口，它也支持DisplayPort 1.4。结合Mini DP和HDMI，有许多外部显示器的连接选项。

左侧。Kensington锁，电源，1个USB-A 3.2 Gen 1，1个USB-A 3.2 Gen 2

背面：1个迷你DP 1.4，HDMI，2.5千兆网络，1个USB-C 3.2 Gen 2（包括DP 1.4）。

沟通

技嘉A7 X1可以通过千兆网络、蓝牙5.2和Wi-Fi 6建立网络连接。与我们的Netgear Nighthawk AX12参考路由器相结合，后者发送数据的平均速度为988 Mb/s，接收数据的平均速度为1,432 Mb/s。虽然第一个数值只够在我们的测试领域中排名倒数第二，但在接收数据方面，A7 X1超过了我们选择的竞争设备。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Medion Erazer Beast X25 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1498 (748^min - 1544^max) MBit/s +52%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1351 (1239^min - 1420^max) MBit/s +37%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1350 MBit/s +37%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (447 - 1645, n=127)	1104 MBit/s +12%
Gigabyte A7 X1 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	988 (942^min - 1041^max) MBit/s
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM	582 (312^min - 680^max) MBit/s -41%
iperf3 receive AX12
Gigabyte A7 X1 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1432 (1269^min - 1668^max) MBit/s
Medion Erazer Beast X25 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1390 (669^min - 1618^max) MBit/s -3%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1370 MBit/s -4%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (523 - 1684, n=128)	1191 MBit/s -17%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1021 (947^min - 1109^max) MBit/s -29%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM	569 (350^min - 709^max) MBit/s -60%

Gigabyte A7 X1; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1432 (1269-1668)

Gigabyte A7 X1; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø988 (942-1041)

网络摄像头

像大多数其他制造商一样，技嘉在A7 X1中安装了一个低分辨率的90万像素网络摄像头。即使在良好的照明条件下，网络摄像头也会显示模糊的图像和过于苍白的颜色。

ColorChecker Gigabyte A7 X1: 17.82 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 27.7 ∆E

辅料

Gigabyte A7 X1除了笔记本外，还配备了相应的电源适配器。其他配件和更换电池等，可以直接向技嘉公司订购。

维护

Gigabyte A7 X1的底盖在卸下所有可见的螺丝后可以取下。内部可以看到一个空的2.5英寸驱动器插槽。WLAN模块和RAM也可以被替换。此外，在工厂安装的固态硬盘旁边还有第二个M.2插槽。

担保

Gigabyte为A7 X1提供了24个月的保修期。

输入设备 - 带键盘背光的技嘉笔记本电脑

键盘

A7 X1的键盘为手指提供了良好的抓握感，因此也适合输入长篇文字。此外，方向键是正常大小的，只有F键和数字键盘的键比较窄。由于使用了完整的键盘布局，也不需要进行双重分配。

键盘还具有背光功能，尽管颜色不能定制。字母被均匀地照亮，没有眩光。

触摸板

技嘉选择了一个带有独立鼠标按键的触摸板作为鼠标的替代品。虽然触摸板的表面完全适合导航鼠标指针，但鼠标按钮感觉有点软，取决于你按下它们的位置。不过，触摸板对触发的输入有声音的反应。

显示器 - 144赫兹IPS面板

技嘉A7 X1的屏幕包括一个17.3英寸的IPS面板，提供1920x1080像素的分辨率。平均最大亮度为318cd/m²，相当于我们测试领域的中等水平。另一方面，95%的亮度分布是我们选择的竞争者设备中最高的。

没有PWM，用于亮度控制，这对眼睛敏感的用户是有帮助的。


313 cd/m²	326 cd/m²	319 cd/m²
319 cd/m²	325 cd/m²	315 cd/m²
315 cd/m²	320 cd/m²	311 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

AU Optronics AUO8E8D tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 326 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 318.1 cd/m² Minimum: 15 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 325 cd/m²
Contrast: 1121:1 (Black: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 4.33 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
calibrated: 1.95
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 5.5 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
63.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
90.9% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
61.5% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.142
CCT: 7893 K

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Gigabyte A7 X1 AU Optronics AUO8E8D, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Medion Erazer Beast X25 BOE NE173FHM-NZ1 (BOE0884), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Medion Erazer Beast X20 BOE CQ NE173QHM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"	Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM AU Optronics AUI8294 (B173HAN04.9), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) BOE NE173QHM-NY2 (BOE0977), IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"
Display		12%	12%	-34%	13%
Display P3 Coverage (%)	61.5	70.4 14%	70.1 14%	40.1 -35%	70.5 15%
sRGB Coverage (%)	90.9	99.8 10%	99 9%	60 -34%	99.5 9%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%)	63.2	71.6 13%	71.3 13%	41.4 -34%	71.8 14%
Response Times		45%	6%	-105%	1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms)	16 ?(7.6, 8.4)	9.2 ?(4.8, 4.4) 42%	16 ?(8.4, 7.6) -0%	32.4 -103%	16.8 ?(8.4, 8.4) -5%
Response Time Black / White * (ms)	10.8 ?(6.4, 4.4)	5.6 ?(2.8, 2.8) 48%	9.6 ?(4.4, 5.2) 11%	22.4 -107%	10 ?(4, 6) 7%
PWM Frequency (Hz)
Screen		17%	19%	-11%	19%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	325	329 1%	370 14%	266 -18%	410 26%
Brightness (cd/m²)	318	315 -1%	341 7%	264 -17%	381 20%
Brightness Distribution (%)	95	88 -7%	82 -14%	79 -17%	88 -7%
Black Level * (cd/m²)	0.29	0.33 -14%	0.42 -45%	0.32 -10%	0.37 -28%
Contrast (:1)	1121	997 -11%	881 -21%	831 -26%	1108 -1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.33	2.03 53%	1.76 59%	3.97 8%	2.55 41%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.6	5.5 36%	2.88 67%	8.93 -4%	4.33 50%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.95	0.82 58%	1.3 33%	3.5 -79%	1.28 34%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	5.5	3.5 36%	1.8 67%	1.8 67%	3.4 38%
Gamma	2.142 ^103%	2.223 ^99%	2.176 ^101%	2.31 ^95%	2.275 ^97%
CCT	7893 ^82%	6526 ^100%	6543 ^99%	6754 ^96%	6637 ^98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) (%)				41.4	72
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) (%)				60	95
Total Average (Program / Settings)		25% / 20%	12% / 15%	-50% / -29%	11% / 15%

* ... smaller is better

技嘉的游戏笔记本电脑也能够在我们的测试领域中领先，其对比度为1,121:1，黑度为0.29 cd/m²。90.9%（sRGB）和63.2%（AdobeRGB）的色彩空间覆盖率略低，但图像看起来仍然很生动。

CalMAN分析还显示，显示的颜色的蓝色比例过高，开箱就有。然而，这几乎可以通过校准来完全纠正。相应的ICC文件可以在位于顶部、显示器亮度分布图右侧的窗口中下载。

只要看好有阴凉的地方，技嘉的游戏笔记本绝对可以在户外使用。哑光屏幕不反光，但显示亮度不足以补偿强烈的环境光线。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
10.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6.4 ms rise
10.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7.6 ms rise
16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 8.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8156 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Gigabyte A7 X1的IPS面板是非常稳定的可视角度。这使得即使从非常平坦的角度观看内容也不会出现失真或不准确的颜色。

性能 - 即使在长时间的负载下也很稳定

Gigabyte为A7 X1配备了最新的游戏硬件。我们的评测配置配备了强大的AMD CPU，但这个模型也可以作为技嘉K7的Intel Core i7-10870H 和NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060 。

处理器

这里使用的AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX是一个有八个核心的处理器，可以同时处理多达16个任务。时钟频率在3.3和4.6GHz之间，冷却系统和预设的TDP对性能有很大责任。技嘉选择的长期TDP值（PL1）为54瓦。短期功耗（PL2）可以达到65瓦。

在我们的Cinebench R15连续负载循环中，技嘉的游戏笔记本电脑能够将其CPU性能保持在一个非常稳定和高的水平。特别是在个别测试中，A7 X1显示出良好的多核性能，这通常足以在我们的测试领域中获得最高排名之一。

Cinebench R15 Multi endurance test

Gigabyte A7 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX: Ø2064 (2046.66-2087.25)

Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX: Ø2004 (1981.96-2041.34)

Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H: Ø1321 (1310.36-1336.01)

Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM Intel Core i9-11900H: Ø1874 (1698.44-2029.22)

Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø2061 (2036.87-2108.48)

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 40970, n=145, last 2 years)	25130 Points +101%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (6622 - 14363, n=30)	12529 Points 0%
Gigabyte A7 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	12476 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	12373 Points -1%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	11739 Points -6%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM Intel Core i9-11900H	11567 Points -7%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H	8250 Points -34%
Single Core
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2267, n=145, last 2 years)	1978 Points +34%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM Intel Core i9-11900H	1574 Points +6%
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	1491 Points +1%
Gigabyte A7 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	1479 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (1218 - 1499, n=29)	1471 Points -1%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	1403 Points -5%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H	1227 Points -17%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 16108, n=144, last 2 years)	9678 Points +100%
Gigabyte A7 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	4850 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (2242 - 5476, n=30)	4847 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	4776 Points -2%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	4510 Points -7%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM Intel Core i9-11900H	4403 Points -9%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H	3027 Points -38%
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming (439 - 870, n=144, last 2 years)	764 Points +32%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM Intel Core i9-11900H	600 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	581 Points 0%
Gigabyte A7 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	580 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (471 - 584, n=29)	573 Points -1%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	540 Points -7%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H	470 Points -19%

Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (1537 - 6271, n=144, last 2 years)	3889 Points +86%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	2108 (2036.87^min - 2108.48^max) Points +1%
Gigabyte A7 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	2087 (2046.66^min - 2087.25^max) Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (1076 - 2267, n=29)	2050 Points -2%
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	2041 (1981.96^min - 2041.34^max) Points -2%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM Intel Core i9-11900H	2029 Points -3%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H	1336 Points -36%
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (188.8 - 343, n=143, last 2 years)	293 Points +22%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM Intel Core i9-11900H	241 Points 0%
Gigabyte A7 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	241 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	239 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (197 - 243, n=25)	238 Points -1%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	232 Points -4%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H	201 Points -17%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H	333 Seconds * -35%
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	250 Seconds * -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (219 - 442, n=29)	250 Seconds * -2%
Gigabyte A7 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	246 Seconds *
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	245 Seconds * -0%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM Intel Core i9-11900H	242 Seconds * +2%
Average of class Gaming (80 - 517, n=140, last 2 years)	154.6 Seconds * +37%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 148086, n=142, last 2 years)	91084 MIPS +65%
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	59182 MIPS +7%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	57284 MIPS +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (36011 - 62503, n=29)	57266 MIPS +4%
Gigabyte A7 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	55231 MIPS
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM Intel Core i9-11900H	50441 MIPS -9%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H	39581 MIPS -28%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7508, n=142, last 2 years)	6391 MIPS +12%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM Intel Core i9-11900H	5870 MIPS +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (4791 - 5905, n=29)	5701 MIPS 0%
Gigabyte A7 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	5681 MIPS
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	5664 MIPS 0%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	5590 MIPS -2%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H	5321 MIPS -6%

Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 27010, n=141, last 2 years)	16709 Points +120%
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	9294 Points +22%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (5057 - 9294, n=27)	8188 Points +8%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	8035 Points +6%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM Intel Core i9-11900H	7725 Points +2%
Gigabyte A7 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	7599 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H	6403 Points -16%
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2423, n=141, last 2 years)	2001 Points +30%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM Intel Core i9-11900H	1576 Points +2%
Gigabyte A7 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	1538 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	1529 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (1271 - 1574, n=27)	1517 Points -1%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	1354 Points -12%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H	1191 Points -23%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming (7.7 - 44.3, n=142, last 2 years)	27.1 fps +83%
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	15.8 fps +7%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	15.6 fps +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (8.26 - 17.1, n=29)	15.2 fps +3%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM Intel Core i9-11900H	14.9 fps +1%
Gigabyte A7 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	14.8 fps
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H	10.7 fps -28%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Gigabyte A7 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	56.5 s *
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (44.1 - 87.4, n=29)	53.3 s * +6%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H	52.2 s * +8%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	50.8 s * +10%
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	49.3 s * +13%
Average of class Gaming (19 - 88.8, n=141, last 2 years)	47.6 s * +16%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM Intel Core i9-11900H	45.8 s * +19%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H	0.6 sec * -20%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM Intel Core i9-11900H	0.529 sec * -5%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	0.512 sec * -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (0.48 - 0.599, n=29)	0.507 sec * -1%
Gigabyte A7 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	0.502 sec *
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	0.4926 sec * +2%
Average of class Gaming (0.3551 - 0.759, n=143, last 2 years)	0.4285 sec * +15%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2087 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

169 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

241 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

4850 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

580 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1479 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

12476 Points

Help

... in comparison

系统性能

在评估系统性能的PCMark 10测试中，技嘉A7 X1在我们的测试领域中取得了中间的分数。虽然它在 "生产力 "和 "数字内容创作 "子类别中达到了第一名，但 "基本要素 "得分不高，使总体评分下降。

在我们的测试期间，系统运行非常流畅，对输入的反应非常快。应用程序和文件夹的启动和打开都没有延迟。

PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=119, last 2 years)	8068 Points +17%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	6983 Points +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (6875 - 6967, n=4)	6916 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	6901 Points 0%
Gigabyte A7 X1 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4	6898 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X25 GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	6842 Points -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Phison E12S-2TB-Phison-SSD-BICS4	5908 Points -14%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average of class Gaming (8840 - 12600, n=123, last 2 years)	10750 Points +8%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	10602 Points +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (9991 - 10413, n=3)	10170 Points +2%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	10051 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X25 GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	10018 Points 0%
Gigabyte A7 X1 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4	9991 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X20 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Phison E12S-2TB-Phison-SSD-BICS4	8609 Points -14%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=119, last 2 years)	9827 Points +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (9301 - 9381, n=3)	9335 Points 0%
Gigabyte A7 X1 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4	9324 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X25 GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9252 Points -1%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	9071 Points -3%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	8849 Points -5%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Phison E12S-2TB-Phison-SSD-BICS4	7771 Points -17%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming (7440 - 19351, n=119, last 2 years)	13660 Points +43%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	10389 Points +9%
Gigabyte A7 X1 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4	9561 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (9383 - 9561, n=3)	9446 Points -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X25 GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9377 Points -2%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	9274 Points -3%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Phison E12S-2TB-Phison-SSD-BICS4	8367 Points -12%

PCMark 10 Score		6898 points
Help

DPC延迟

在我们的测试配置中，技嘉A7 X1在LatencyMon测试中显示出非常低的延迟。这使它很适合实时应用。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	1821 μs * -130%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	1399 μs * -77%
Medion Erazer Beast X25 GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	907 μs * -15%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Phison E12S-2TB-Phison-SSD-BICS4	844 μs * -7%
Gigabyte A7 X1 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4	792 μs *

* ... smaller is better

储存

在我们的测试配置中，技嘉使用的固态硬盘显示出非常好的读写速率，在大多数情况下，它只被我们测试领域的其他产品略微超越。

关于与其他大容量存储设备的比较，请参阅我们的HDD/SSD基准测试文章。

	Gigabyte A7 X1 ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4	Medion Erazer Beast X25 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	Medion Erazer Beast X20 Phison E12S-2TB-Phison-SSD-BICS4	Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	Average ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		14%	3%	18%	27%	3%
Write 4K (MB/s)	125.1	129.7 4%	155.5 24%	168.8 35%	206.1 65%	131.7 ?(125.1 - 137.6, n=4) 5%
Read 4K (MB/s)	43.51	62.4 43%	47.96 10%	72 65%	53 22%	45.4 ?(43.5 - 46.9, n=4) 4%
Write Seq (MB/s)	2128	2436 14%	1591 -25%		3018 42%	2303 ?(2128 - 2509, n=4) 8%
Read Seq (MB/s)	1958	2354 20%	1371 -30%		2575 32%	1716 ?(1052 - 2209, n=4) -12%
Write 4K Q32T1 (MB/s)	579	512 -12%	532 -8%	459.5 -21%	535 -8%	525 ?(374 - 601, n=4) -9%
Read 4K Q32T1 (MB/s)	464.4	436.2 -6%	627 35%	473.1 2%	608 31%	581 ?(464 - 677, n=4) 25%
Write Seq Q32T1 (MB/s)	2501	3541 42%	3017 21%	3129 25%	3242 30%	2515 ?(2501 - 2536, n=4) 1%
Read Seq Q32T1 (MB/s)	3473	3568 3%	3440 -1%	3529 2%	3617 4%	3417 ?(3372 - 3473, n=4) -2%
AS SSD		16%	15%	10%	26%	6%
Seq Read (MB/s)	2859	2591 -9%	2849 0%	2837 -1%	3020 6%	2643 ?(2048 - 2972, n=4) -8%
Seq Write (MB/s)	1530	1900 24%	2831 85%	1565 2%	2631 72%	2134 ?(1530 - 2403, n=4) 39%
4K Read (MB/s)	41.47	53.9 30%	51.3 24%	55.4 34%	60.3 45%	48.3 ?(41.5 - 55.7, n=4) 16%
4K Write (MB/s)	133.9	112.6 -16%	106.3 -21%	152.9 14%	171.6 28%	116.4 ?(98.8 - 133.9, n=4) -13%
4K-64 Read (MB/s)	1218	1335 10%	1763 45%	1327 9%	1410 16%	1586 ?(1218 - 1775, n=4) 30%
4K-64 Write (MB/s)	2108	2966 41%	2010 -5%	1922 -9%	2324 10%	1975 ?(1473 - 2267, n=4) -6%
Access Time Read * (ms)	0.098	0.038 61%	0.093 5%	0.035 64%	0.045 54%	0.09975 ?(0.079 - 0.131, n=4) -2%
Access Time Write * (ms)	0.028	0.036 -29%	0.035 -25%	0.028 -0%	0.024 14%	0.03325 ?(0.028 - 0.039, n=4) -19%
Score Read (Points)	1545	1648 7%	2099 36%	1666 8%	1773 15%	1899 ?(1545 - 2128, n=4) 23%
Score Write (Points)	2395	3269 36%	2399 0%	2232 -7%	2759 15%	2305 ?(1815 - 2598, n=4) -4%
Score Total (Points)	4666	5733 23%	5573 19%	4695 1%	5429 16%	5151 ?(4645 - 5698, n=4) 10%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		15% / 15%	9% / 10%	14% / 13%	27% / 27%	5% / 5%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3473 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2501 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 464.4 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 579 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1958 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 2128 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 43.51 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 125.1 MB/s

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

图形卡

一个NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070，负责在A7 X1中渲染要求高的图像内容。后者可以以140瓦的TDP运行，从而在3DMark测试中取得非常好的结果，这与我们测试领域的顶尖位置之一只差一点点。另一方面，当涉及到3DMark 11基准测试时，技嘉笔记本电脑可以引领我们的测试领域。

要看其他显卡的对比表现，请看我们的GPU基准测试文章。

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (13523 - 80022, n=136, last 2 years)	48473 Points +35%
Gigabyte A7 X1 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	35909 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X25 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	35678 Points -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H	34071 Points -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (12535 - 38275, n=54)	32331 Points -10%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11900H	25793 Points -28%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	169244 Points +26%
Average of class Gaming (84648 - 223650, n=63, last 2 years)	145258 Points +8%
Gigabyte A7 X1 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	134236 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (45531 - 179716, n=33)	121367 Points -10%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11900H	110773 Points -17%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H	106962 Points -20%
Medion Erazer Beast X25 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	95835 Points -29%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (6487 - 62849, n=150, last 2 years)	36088 Points +40%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	27968 Points +8%
Medion Erazer Beast X25 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	26771 Points +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H	25849 Points 0%
Gigabyte A7 X1 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	25794 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (7178 - 29128, n=52)	24302 Points -6%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11900H	19737 Points -23%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (2295 - 25984, n=147, last 2 years)	14959 Points +42%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	10898 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X25 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	10752 Points +2%
Gigabyte A7 X1 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	10570 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H	9619 Points -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (2644 - 11019, n=53)	9300 Points -12%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11900H	7582 Points -28%

3DMark 11 Performance		26404 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		54931 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		23233 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		10315 points
Help

... in comparison

游戏性能

在我们测试的游戏中，技嘉A7 X1在全高清分辨率和最大细节方面始终实现了流畅和高帧率。这意味着最近和即将推出的游戏都能顺利运行，没有任何问题。与我们的测试领域相比，所取得的速率处于中等水平，略低于其他游戏笔记本电脑的平均水平，有时会有NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070。

我们的GPU基准测试文章，显示了在其他游戏中可以从NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070的性能预期。

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 240, n=60, last 2 years)	138.9 fps +45%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	103 (33.5^min, 51.4^P0.1, 68^P1 - 190^max) fps +7%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	101 fps +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	97.9 (84^min) fps +2%
Gigabyte A7 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	95.9 (80^min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (34.9 - 109, n=52)	91.8 fps -4%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	74 fps -23%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average of class Gaming (65.1 - 248, n=143, last 2 years)	154.3 fps +37%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	128 (112.9^min) fps +13%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	121 (106.3^min) fps +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (26.9 - 163.9, n=58)	120.7 fps +7%
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	119 (104.1^min) fps +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	115 (99.6^min) fps +2%
Gigabyte A7 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	113 (100.7^min) fps

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 215, n=141, last 2 years)	135.9 fps
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	97 fps
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	91.6 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (27.9 - 107, n=49)	86.4 fps
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	72.3 fps

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 186.9, n=129, last 2 years)	124.5 fps +49%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	97 (8.76^min, 66.7^P1 - 172^max) fps +16%
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	91.9 (26.9^min, 66.7^P1 - 171^max) fps +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (21.7 - 125.8, n=50)	91 fps +9%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	88.5 (16.4^min, 58.8^P1 - 182^max) fps +6%
Gigabyte A7 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	83.6 (9.74^min, 58.8^P1 - 149^max) fps
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	80.4 (8.99^min, 55.6^P1 - 149^max) fps -4%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 456, n=128, last 2 years)	261 fps +41%
Gigabyte A7 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	185 (39.2^min, 139^P1 - 321^max) fps
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	168 (84.4^min, 126^P1 - 285^max) fps -9%
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	168 (63.8^min, 123^P1 - 334^max) fps -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (36.2 - 194, n=46)	159 fps -14%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	130 (88.3^min, 98.4^P1 - 218^max) fps -30%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Gaming (33.4 - 150.2, n=146, last 2 years)	103.8 fps +44%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (12.4 - 118.8, n=61)	81.1 fps +12%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	80.1 fps +11%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	75.8 fps +5%
Gigabyte A7 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	72.2 fps
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	72.1 fps 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	69.9 fps -3%

我们用TheWitcher 3进行的耐力测试也表明，即使在长时间的游戏过程中，性能也不会受到明显的影响，而且系统能够很好地补偿波动的影响。

The Witcher 3 FPS diagram

Gigabyte A7 X1 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU: Ø95.1 (87-99)

	low	med.	high	ultra
GTA V (2015)	174	164	139	83.6
The Witcher 3 (2015)				95.9
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	139	125	119	113
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	98.9	86.8	72.2
Strange Brigade (2018)	311	232	208	185
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 (2020)	104.5	89.6	77.1	66.3

排放 - 笔记本电脑也能安静地运行

噪声排放

当技嘉A7 X1只用于运行浏览器和执行办公任务时，笔记本电脑通常是安静的，风扇很少上升到安静的35 dB(A)。然而，在负载和游戏模式下，噪音水平会变得相当大，而且很烦人，最高可达59 dB(A)。

我们无法检测到任何其他背景噪音，如线圈啸叫或类似情况。

Noise level

Idle		25 / 29 / 35 dB(A)
Load		58 / 59 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A)

温度

根据我们的测量，技嘉A7 X1的表面加热到49℃（约120°F）。最热的地方是在左下角，但游戏笔记本从未感觉太热。掌托也只是适度发热。

在我们持续约一小时的耐久压力测试中，技嘉A7 X1内部的温度攀升至99℃（约210°F）。然而，CPU时钟速率从未低于3.3GHz的基本值，系统继续平稳运行。我们在TheWitcher 3 的耐力压力测试中也可以看到这种行为，尽管这里的时钟频率甚至略高，约为3.5 GHz。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


41 °C	42 °C	44 °C
40 °C	43 °C	42 °C
35 °C	39 °C	34 °C

Maximum: 44 °C
Average: 40 °C


49 °C	42 °C	42 °C
38 °C	40 °C	41 °C
36 °C	39 °C	34 °C

Maximum: 49 °C
Average: 40.1 °C

Power Supply (max.) 54 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


26 °C	26 °C	26 °C
26 °C	26 °C	26 °C
27 °C	27 °C	25 °C

Maximum: 27 °C
Average: 26.1 °C


27 °C	27 °C	26 °C
27 °C	29 °C	30 °C
26 °C	29 °C	30 °C

Maximum: 30 °C
Average: 27.9 °C

Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


39 °C	42 °C	44 °C
40 °C	43 °C	43 °C
34 °C	41 °C	39 °C

Maximum: 44 °C
Average: 40.6 °C


47 °C	43 °C	38 °C
37 °C	37 °C	39 °C
38 °C	40 °C	33 °C

Maximum: 47 °C
Average: 39.1 °C

Power Supply (max.) 54 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41 °C / 105.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-12.1 °C / -21.8 F).

发言人

技嘉A7 X1的扬声器提供了一个相对较高的音量和一个以中音和高音为主的声谱。这使得它们完全适合播放媒体内容。然而，从长远来看，建议使用外部扬声器或耳机。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Gigabyte A7 X1 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

能源管理--电池寿命略显不足

能源消耗

在我们的空闲情况下，平均功耗为14瓦，技嘉A7 X1是我们测试领域中最节俭的笔记本电脑之一。不过，在负载情况下，功耗可以达到229瓦的短峰值。在游戏过程中，大约205瓦的数值是可以预期的。

附带的电源适配器可以处理230瓦的输出，这是一个足够高的容量。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.7 / 3 Watt
Idle	12 / 14 / 19 Watt
Load	118 / 229 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Gigabyte A7 X1 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	Medion Erazer Beast X25 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	Medion Erazer Beast X20 i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		-41%	-15%	17%	-12%	-21%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	12	22 -83%	13 -8%	10.3 14%	13 -8%	13.8 ?(4.2 - 41.5, n=123, last 2 years) -15%
Idle Average * (Watt)	14	26 -86%	18 -29%	13.1 6%	16 -14%	19.7 ?(6.8 - 55.6, n=123, last 2 years) -41%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	19	34 -79%	32 -68%	14.1 26%	26 -37%	26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=123, last 2 years) -41%
Load Average * (Watt)	118	120 -2%	106 10%	110 7%	125 -6%	111.1 ?(59.2 - 201, n=121, last 2 years) 6%
Witcher 3 ultra * (Watt)	205	189 8%	192 6%	138 33%	187 9%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	229	231 -1%	232 -1%	190 17%	259 -13%	261 ?(122 - 431, n=123, last 2 years) -14%

* ... smaller is better

Energy consumption during The Witcher 3 / stress test

Gigabyte A7 X1: Ø205 (200-212)

电池寿命

在我们的真实世界Wi-Fi测试中，技嘉A7 X1实现了4:40小时的运行时间。这意味着它很好地利用了其48.96Wh的电池，但它没有达到我们选择的竞争对手的速率。作为回报，这款游戏笔记本的电池可以在不需要工具的情况下拆下，必要时可以更换。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing		4h 40min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 12min

	Gigabyte A7 X1 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 48.96 Wh	Medion Erazer Beast X25 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 91 Wh	Medion Erazer Beast X20 i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 91 Wh	Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 62 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery runtime		31%	62%	85%	-34%	30%
WiFi v1.3 (h)	4.7	6.8 45%	6.2 32%	7.6 62%	3.5 -26%	6.61 ?(1.417 - 14.8, n=125, last 2 years) 41%
Load (h)	1.2	1.4 17%	2.3 92%	2.5 108%	0.7 -42%	1.42 ?(0.683 - 2.73, n=61, last 2 years) 18%

Pros

+ 非常好的维护选项

+ 即使在重负荷下也有稳定的性能

+ 不需要工具就可以更换电池

Cons

- 中等的电池寿命

- 笨重的外壳

评语 - 强大且可升级

在审查中。Gigabyte A7 X1。测试设备由德国Gigabyte公司提供。

就外观而言，技嘉A7 X1当然不是一款时尚、纤薄、超移动的游戏笔记本。但它做了它应该做的事情，即把游戏流畅地带到屏幕上，非常好。处理器和GeForce RTX 3070，都能够不受限制地释放其性能，这要归功于通风良好的机箱。

技嘉A7 X1将现代游戏流畅地呈现在屏幕上，并提供出色的维护选项。

大型结构的另一个优点是许多组件可以很容易地升级或更换。例如，不仅可以完全更换电池而不需要工具，而且内部还有额外的免费插槽用于大容量存储设备，你还可以获得WLAN模块和RAM。

如果你觉得A7 X1太笨重，你可以看看15英寸的技嘉G5 KC对应产品，它配备了英特尔CPU。Schenker XMG Neo 17，它更苗条一些，但也更贵。

价格和可用性

在撰写本文时，你可以在Amazon 和Newegg 上找到技嘉A7 X1 ，例如。

Gigabyte A7 X1 - 10/13/2021 v7 ^(old)
Mike Wobker

Chassis

80 / 98 → 82%

Keyboard

81%

Pointing Device

78%

Connectivity

62 / 80 → 77%

Weight

60 / 10-66 → 89%

Battery

62 / 95 → 65%

Display

84%

Games Performance

98%

Application Performance

94%

Temperature

85 / 95 → 90%

Noise

57 / 90 → 63%

Audio

72%

Camera

34 / 85 → 40%

Average

73%

83%

Gaming - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Stephanie Chamberlain - Translator - 571 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020

contact me via: LinkedIn

Translator: Stefan Hinum - Founder, CEO, CFO - 25280 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2006

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Gigabyte A7 X1在审查中。游戏笔记本提供稳定的续航性能

Mike Wobker, 2021-10-19 (Update: 2024-11- 4)

Possible contenders in comparison

案例 - 可更换电池的游戏笔记本

Size comparison

连接性 - 笔记本电脑支持连接多个显示器

沟通

网络摄像头

辅料

维护

担保

输入设备 - 带键盘背光的技嘉笔记本电脑

键盘

触摸板

显示器 - 144赫兹IPS面板

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能 - 即使在长时间的负载下也很稳定

处理器

Cinebench R15 Multi endurance test

系统性能

DPC延迟

储存

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

游戏性能

The Witcher 3 FPS diagram

排放 - 笔记本电脑也能安静地运行

噪声排放

温度

发言人

Gigabyte A7 X1 audio analysis

Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) audio analysis

能源管理--电池寿命略显不足

能源消耗

Energy consumption during The Witcher 3 / stress test

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

评语 - 强大且可升级

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Price comparison