华硕Zephyrus G14 GA401Q评测。阿兰-沃克特别版14英寸游戏笔记本

Name: Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
Brand: Asus

Zen 3 Cezanne和Nvidia Ampere采用了特殊设计。 Zephyrus G14是一款紧凑的游戏设备，在很长一段时间内无人能及。为了与竞争对手拉开距离，华硕在Zephyrus G14上采取了不同的方法，将该设备作为 "Alan Walker特别版"，其漂亮的设计特点使该设备在视觉上非常醒目。

Sebastian Bade, 👁 Sebastian Bade (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), Published 10/16/2021 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Cezanne (Zen 3) Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Ryzen (Zen)

紧凑的Zephyrus G14去年推出，它成功地以其在小空间中所容纳的能量给我们留下了深刻印象。今年，由于AMD和新的Zen 3处理器，新版本还提供了更多的动力。新的Ryzen 9 5900HS在华硕Zephyrus G14 GA401QM，结合GeForce RTX 3060笔记本电脑，已经令人印象深刻。现在发布的采用Alan Walker设计的特别版是基于相同的平台，尽管在GPU方面随着RTX 3050 Ti笔记本模型的实施而做了小幅降级。

特别版的设计对设备进行了装饰，加上显示盖上的矩阵显示器，它提供了一种非常独特的方式来吸引人们的注意力。此外，还有一块刷新率为120赫兹的WQHD面板；由此产生的显示屏和独特的设计组合证明了约1850欧元（约2145美元）的购买价格是合理的。目前，配备RTX 3060的Zephyrus G14价格约为1,800欧元（约2,088美元）。

Test device courtesy of Asus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Zephyrus G14 GA401Q - Alan Walker Special Edition (ROG Zephyrus G14 GA401 Series)

Processor

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS 8 x 3 - 4.6 GHz, 80 W PL2 / Short Burst, 80 W PL1 / Sustained, Cezanne-HS (Zen 3)

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU - 4 GB VRAM, Core: 1585 MHz, Memory: 1530 MHz, 60 W TDP ( including 75 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, Nvidia 462.13

Memory

16 GB

, DDR4, 22-22-22-52, dual-channel

Display

14.00 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 210 PPI, TL140BDXP01-0, IPS, Adaptive Sync, glossy: no, 120 Hz

Storage

Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB, 1024 GB

, 900 GB free

Connections

2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio jack

Networking

Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 19.9 x 324 x 222

Battery

76 Wh Lithium-Polymer, 4-cell

Additional features

Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, Armoury Crate, Radeon software, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

1.741 kg, Power Supply: 578 g

Price

1 EUR

Links

Asus homepage
Asus notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
82.7 %	10/2021	Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC R9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	1.7 kg	19.9 mm	14.00"	2560x1440
83.5 %	02/2021	Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM R9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	1.7 kg	19.9 mm	14.00"	1920x1080
83.6 %	04/2020	Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV R9 4900HS, GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q	1.6 kg	17.9 mm	14.00"	1920x1080
87.5 %	07/2021	Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	1.8 kg	16.8 mm	14.00"	2560x1440
83.2 %	10/2021	SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	1.9 kg	22 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
79.2 %	09/2021	MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	25 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
82.2 %	08/2021	Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	23.9 mm	15.60"	2560x1440

案例

艾伦-沃克特别版中的Zephyrus G14的外壳是基于华硕Zephyrus G14 GA401QM的，我们能够对其进行彻底的审查。更多细节请参考该评论。

特别版的修改严格来说是视觉上的，而且第一眼就能明显感觉到。华硕玩家共和国（ROG）和音乐制作人Alan Walker作为合作的一部分，发布了华硕Zephyrus G14的这个特别版。即使在关闭状态下，你也能看出该设备是Alan Walker版，这要归功于所有的字母和签名。即使是键盘也没有被忽视，因为它已经被装饰上了相应的口音。

华硕在显示屏的盖子上加入了一个很好的噱头。一个由1215个LED组成的矩阵面板，可以被配置为以滚动文本的形式显示定制信息。但标识和系统信息也可以在那里显示，但这没有什么意义，因为用户在正常使用时看不到这些信息。因此，矩阵面板纯粹是一个很好的功能。

Size comparison

Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 DIN A4 ❌

连接性

右边。电源，HDMI 2.0b，USB-C 3.2 Gen. 2（带DP、PD和G-Sync），组合式3.5毫米音频插孔

左边：USB-C 3.2 Gen. 2（无DP、PD或G-Sync），2个USB-A 3.2 Gen. 1，Kensington锁

显示器 - WQHD和120赫兹

我们的审查样本配备了120赫兹的WQHD显示屏。结合14英寸的对角线尺寸，这导致了210 ppi的像素密度。与结构相同的Zephyrus G14的全高清面板相比，WQHD显示屏的整体表现略好。在亮度及其分布方面，两款显示器都取得了类似的好成绩，尽管Schenker XMG Focus 15的显示器要亮很多。

在120赫兹下，WQHD面板比全高清显示器的144赫兹要慢一些，但这在正常使用中并不重要。当涉及到背光出血时，我们的审查样本在完全黑暗的环境中取得了非常好的效果，没有看到任何亮点。同样，在我们的Zephyrus G14中，PWM不是一个问题，在这次审查中的任何其他对比设备中也是如此。


314 cd/m²	322 cd/m²	328 cd/m²
321 cd/m²	333 cd/m²	324 cd/m²
296 cd/m²	310 cd/m²	302 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

TL140BDXP01-0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 333 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 316.7 cd/m² Minimum: 15.8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 196 cd/m²
Contrast: 925:1 (Black: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.58 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 2.88
ΔE Greyscale 7.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
84.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.28

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC TL140BDXP01-0, IPS, 2560x1440, 14.00	Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM LM140LF-1F02, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00	Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV CEC PA LM140LF-1F01, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00	Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 TL140BDXP02-2, IPS, 2560x1440, 14.00	SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB5, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 AU Optronics B156HAN08.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH BOE BOE09B8, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60
Display		-19%	-19%	1%	-19%	-20%	-18%
Display P3 Coverage	94.2	68.1 -28%	66.5 -29%	97.2 3%	64.6 -31%	65.4 -31%	66.2 -30%
sRGB Coverage	99.9	92.4 -8%	92 -8%	99.9 0%	95.3 -5%	91.3 -9%	96.3 -4%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	84.5	67.7 -20%	67.2 -20%	85.4 1%	66.5 -21%	66.7 -21%	67.1 -21%
Response Times		-216%	-299%	-31%	-19%	-12%	-2%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	20 ?(11, 9)	34.4 ?(15.6, 18.8) -72%	43.6 ?(21.2, 22.4) -118%	16.4 ?(8, 8.4) 18%	18 ?(9.2, 8.8) 10%	7.4 ?(3.8, 3.6) 63%	14 ?(7, 7) 30%
Response Time Black / White *	6 ?(2, 4)	27.6 ?(16.4, 11.2) -360%	34.8 ?(20.4, 14.4) -480%	10.8 ?(5.6, 5.2) -80%	8.8 ?(3.6, 5.2) -47%	11.2 ?(6, 5.2) -87%	8 ?(4, 4) -33%
PWM Frequency
Screen		6%	26%	24%	33%	15%	-0%
Brightness middle	333	329.4 -1%	322.2 -3%	331.1 -1%	418 26%	307 -8%	349 5%
Brightness	317	311 -2%	302 -5%	318 0%	376 19%	321 1%	304 -4%
Brightness Distribution	89	90 1%	87 -2%	91 2%	83 -7%	83 -7%	79 -11%
Black Level *	0.36	0.39 -8%	0.26 28%	0.36 -0%	0.41 -14%	0.27 25%	0.535 -49%
Contrast	925	845 -9%	1239 34%	920 -1%	1020 10%	1137 23%	652 -30%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.58	4.01 28%	2.43 56%	2.25 60%	1.67 70%	4.67 16%	3.11 44%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10.62	8.21 23%	5.07 52%	4.62 56%	3.88 63%	7.53 29%	9.57 10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	2.88	3.89 -35%	2.29 20%		0.98 66%	2.41 16%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	7.5	3.2 57%	3.3 56%	1.7 77%	2.9 61%	4.5 40%	5 33%
Gamma	2.28 ^96%	2.2 ^100%	2.22 ^99%	2.3 ^96%	2.26 ^97%	2.276 ^97%	2.36 ^93%
CCT	7220 ^90%	7070 ^92%	6902 ^94%	6751 ^96%	6209 ^105%	6824 ^95%	6976 ^93%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)			60
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)			91.9
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-76% / -31%	-97% / -30%	-2% / 10%	-2% / 14%	-6% / 4%	-7% / -5%

* ... smaller is better

华硕Zephyrus G14 GA401Q与AdobeRGB的对比（84.5%）。

与sRGB色彩空间相比，开箱后测得的DeltaE 2000色彩偏差明显过高。这表明华硕为Zephyrus G14提供了一个未经校准的显示器。经过我们的校准，DeltaE 2000色彩偏差在灰度和色彩方面都明显减少。我们的评测样品在色彩空间覆盖方面得分很高，这意味着它可以用于专业用途而没有任何问题。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 11 ms rise
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17915 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

正如预期的那样，华硕Zephyrus G14 GA401Q在可视角度测试中表现良好。这是一个典型的IPS面板，有其优点和缺点。后者指的是四个角落的图像，显示出轻微的雾化。想在户外使用Zephyrus G14的用户最好选择在阴凉处工作。在阳光直射下，由于亮度不足，显示屏会达到极限。

性能--Ryzen 9遇到RTX 3050 Ti

一个游戏设备需要有很好的性能。华硕选择了AMD的最新处理器，Ryzen 9 5900HS ，这才是正确的做法。八核CPU提供了坚实的多核性能，单核性能也在Zen 3的基础上得到了大幅提升。NvidiaGeForce RTX 3050 Ti在我们的审查样本中被用作显卡。16GB的内存和1TB的固态硬盘使整体包装得到了很好的补充。

处理器

华硕的游戏笔记本采用了AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS

。凭借其八个核心和16个线程，该设备也为未来做好了准备。基本时钟速度为3.3GHz，根据工作负荷，可以提高到4.6GHz。因此，在情况允许的情况下，这个35瓦的SoC可以在短时间内消耗高达64瓦的能量。相比之下，我们评测单元中的AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS在单核测试以及多线程基准测试中都表现出非常好的性能。

在Cinebench R15多循环中，AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS的性能非常稳定。结果定格在平均2116分。

更多的比较和基准测试，请参考我们的CPU基准测试文章。

Cinebench R15 Multi endurance test

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS: Ø2116 (2070.39-2126.64)

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS: Ø2088 (2079.33-2098.42)

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS: Ø1655 (1591.98-1850.91)

Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX: Ø2052 (2009.65-2060.79)

SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1723 (1688.33-1770.15)

MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 Intel Core i7-11800H; fan in full speed: Ø1900 (1799.78-2120.55)

MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 Intel Core i7-11800H; Factory settings: Ø1316 (1300.31-1341.52)

Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø1958 (1935.55-1986)

Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34613, n=229, last 2 years)	19422 Points +47%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS	13214 Points
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS	13158 (12786.6^min - 13158^max) Points 0%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	12652 (12516^min - 12651.7^max) Points -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS (11426 - 13214, n=4)	12533 Points -5%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	11942 Points -10%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 Intel Core i7-11800H	10816 Points -18%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 Intel Core i7-11800H	8447 Points -36%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Average of class Gaming (527 - 2235, n=227, last 2 years)	1809 Points +22%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 Intel Core i7-11800H	1517 Points +2%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS	1488 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS (1457 - 1488, n=4)	1474 Points -1%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS	1457 Points -2%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	1433 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 Intel Core i7-11800H	1390 Points -7%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	1218 Points -18%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=227, last 2 years)	7383 Points +43%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS	5167 Points
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS	5058 Points -2%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	4876 Points -6%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS (4414 - 5167, n=4)	4843 Points -6%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	4685 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 Intel Core i7-11800H	4307 Points -17%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	4288 Points -17%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 Intel Core i7-11800H	3306 Points -36%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming (169 - 855, n=227, last 2 years)	697 Points +19%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS	584 Points
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 Intel Core i7-11800H	583 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS (560 - 584, n=4)	572 Points -2%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS	568 Points -3%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	558 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 Intel Core i7-11800H	536 Points -8%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	495 Points -15%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	471 Points -19%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=231, last 2 years)	3074 Points +41%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS	2180 Points
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 Intel Core i7-11800H	2121 (1799.78^min - 2120.55^max) Points -3%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 Intel Core i7-11800H	1342 (1300.31^min - 1341.52^max) Points -38%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS	2098 (2079.33^min - 2098.42^max) Points -4%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	2061 (2009.65^min - 2060.79^max) Points -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS (1927 - 2180, n=5)	2053 Points -6%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	1986 Points -9%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	1863 Points -15%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 Intel Core i7-11800H	1770 (1688.33^min - 1770.15^max) Points -19%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 318, n=230, last 2 years)	268 Points +12%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS	240 Points
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS	235 Points -2%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	231 Points -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS (211 - 240, n=4)	231 Points -4%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 Intel Core i7-11800H	229 Points -5%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 Intel Core i7-11800H	228 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 Intel Core i7-11800H	210 Points -12%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	197 Points -18%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	193 Points -20%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 Intel Core i7-11800H	342 Seconds * -48%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	297 Seconds * -29%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 Intel Core i7-11800H	278 Seconds * -20%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	257 Seconds * -11%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS (231 - 305, n=4)	254 Seconds * -10%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	251 Seconds * -9%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS	233 Seconds * -1%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS	230.9 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming (87 - 1259, n=225, last 2 years)	201 Seconds * +13%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=226, last 2 years)	76641 MIPS +30%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS	58875 MIPS
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS	55697 MIPS -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS (47553 - 59680, n=4)	55451 MIPS -6%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	54052 MIPS -8%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	52370 MIPS -11%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	48577 MIPS -17%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 Intel Core i7-11800H	47642 MIPS -19%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 Intel Core i7-11800H	38156 MIPS -35%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=226, last 2 years)	6113 MIPS +5%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS	5804 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS (5540 - 5804, n=4)	5663 MIPS -2%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS	5637 MIPS -3%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 Intel Core i7-11800H	5567 MIPS -4%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	5531 MIPS -5%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 Intel Core i7-11800H	5164 MIPS -11%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	4791 MIPS -17%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	4634 MIPS -20%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=231, last 2 years)	13504 Points +74%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 Intel Core i7-11800H	9073 Points +17%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS (7767 - 7910, n=3)	7848 Points +1%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS	7767 Points
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	7675 Points -1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	7480 Points -4%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 Intel Core i7-11800H	6758 Points -13%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2193, n=231, last 2 years)	1805 Points +17%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 Intel Core i7-11800H	1585 Points +2%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS	1547 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS (1410 - 1547, n=3)	1485 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 Intel Core i7-11800H	1480 Points -4%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	1458 Points -6%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	1218 Points -21%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=229, last 2 years)	21.1 fps +37%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS	15.4 fps
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS	15.3 fps -1%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	15.3 fps -1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	14.6 fps -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS (12.7 - 15.4, n=4)	14.3 fps -7%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 Intel Core i7-11800H	13.7 fps -11%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	12.19 fps -21%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 Intel Core i7-11800H	11 fps -29%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	77.4 s * -45%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	58.9 s * -10%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS	53.5 s *
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS (50.7 - 54.9, n=4)	52.8 s * +1%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS	51.9 s * +3%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 Intel Core i7-11800H	49.5 s * +7%
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=223, last 2 years)	49.3 s * +8%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 Intel Core i7-11800H	47.3 s * +12%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 Intel Core i7-11800H	0.601 sec * -17%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	0.599 sec * -17%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 Intel Core i7-11800H	0.548 sec * -7%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	0.522 sec * -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS (0.51 - 0.538, n=4)	0.518 sec * -1%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS	0.512 sec *
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS	0.51 sec * -0%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 4.47, n=226, last 2 years)	0.4706 sec * +8%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

6380

Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit

13444 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit

71832 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit

12016 Points

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

13319

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

41235

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit

22.3 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit

96.6 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

2.83 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

24.94 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

95.6 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit

2.45 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

240 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

170.5 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2180 Points

Help

... in comparison

系统性能

PCMark 10的结果将我们的华硕笔记本电脑置于中场，尽管在个别类别中取得了明显更好的排名。与Razer Blade 14的差距相对较小，只有5%，因此在日常使用中不明显。

PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Gaming (5235 - 9852, n=197, last 2 years)	7573 Points +14%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	6967 Points +5%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	6773 Points +2%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00	6738 Points +2%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1	6666 Points +1%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB	6617 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU ()	6617 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	6478 Points -2%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, R9 4900HS, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	5751 Points -13%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average of class Gaming (8300 - 12334, n=196, last 2 years)	10708 Points +6%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	10418 Points +3%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	10413 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	10171 Points +1%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB	10094 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU ()	10094 Points 0%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00	10016 Points -1%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, R9 4900HS, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	9920 Points -2%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1	9248 Points -8%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average of class Gaming (7244 - 11833, n=196, last 2 years)	9727 Points +3%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB	9458 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU ()	9458 Points 0%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	9394 Points -1%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	9381 Points -1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00	9228 Points -2%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1	9217 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	8639 Points -9%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, R9 4900HS, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	7606 Points -20%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming (6462 - 18475, n=196, last 2 years)	11407 Points +39%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1	9431 Points +15%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	9395 Points +14%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00	8982 Points +9%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	8615 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	8399 Points +2%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB	8236 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU ()	8236 Points 0%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, R9 4900HS, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	6843 Points -17%

PCMark 10 Score		6617 points
Help

DPC延迟

LatencyMon显示，在Edge中打开多个浏览器标签和播放我们的4K YouTube视频时，延迟略有上升，但在启动Prime95时，它们没有进一步增加。播放我们的4K测试视频时，iGPU的平均负载为20%。然而，负载峰值高达30%是短暂的可能。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	5542 μs * -429%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, R9 4900HS, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	2841 μs * -171%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB	1048 μs *
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1	953 μs * +9%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	564 μs * +46%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00	415.3 μs * +60%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	392.6 μs * +63%

* ... smaller is better

储存

来自三星的快速NVMe固态硬盘（M.2-2280）充当系统驱动器。固态硬盘的1TB存储空间是一个坚实的容量，这是一个游戏笔记本电脑所期望的。不幸的是，Zephyrus G14不能配备第二个大容量存储设备。

更多比较和基准，请看我们的HDD/SDD基准文章。

	Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB	Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1	Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00	Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		27%	13%	36%	60%	-32%	12%	-1%
Write 4K	118.4	131.9 11%	189.5 60%	146.3 24%	238.3 101%	138.2 17%	161.3 36%	139.1 ?(98.8 - 187.3, n=7) 17%
Read 4K	43.51	54.4 25%	62.7 44%	48.16 11%	55.6 28%	31.31 -28%	49.49 14%	42.3 ?(32.4 - 55, n=7) -3%
Write Seq	1475	2412 64%	1735 18%	2975 102%	3013 104%	459.3 -69%	1970 34%	1397 ?(1283 - 1582, n=6) -5%
Read Seq	1887	2154 14%	1608 -15%	2456 30%	2879 53%	1283 -32%	2007 6%	1608 ?(1349 - 1887, n=6) -15%
Write 4K Q32T1	504	520 3%	475.5 -6%	476 -6%	569 13%	321 -36%	416.8 -17%	420 ?(316 - 504, n=7) -17%
Read 4K Q32T1	409.3	458.1 12%	555 36%	574 40%	715 75%	394.5 -4%	554 35%	479 ?(382 - 708, n=7) 17%
Write Seq Q32T1	1706	2998 76%	1802 6%	3018 77%	3287 93%	436 -74%	1965 15%	1623 ?(1492 - 1719, n=7) -5%
Read Seq Q32T1	3153	3601 14%	1929 -39%	3567 13%	3561 13%	2222 -30%	2369 -25%	2592 ?(2329 - 3153, n=7) -18%
Write 4K Q8T8	518							724 ?(518 - 930, n=2) 40%
Read 4K Q8T8	1453							1208 ?(963 - 1453, n=2) -17%
AS SSD		42%	-8%	55%	62%	-105%	-22%	0%
Seq Read	2618	2923 12%	1278 -51%	3066 17%	2988 14%	1978 -24%	2217 -15%	2181 ?(1960 - 2618, n=7) -17%
Seq Write	1157	1801 56%	1624 40%	2805 142%	2541 120%	308.3 -73%	1929 67%	1266 ?(954 - 1571, n=7) 9%
4K Read	38.32	50 30%	57.8 51%	49.8 30%	42.82 12%	24.04 -37%	28.71 -25%	43.8 ?(31.6 - 51.3, n=7) 14%
4K Write	96.4	109 13%	163 69%	119.7 24%	87 -10%	113.7 18%	146.3 52%	138.4 ?(96.4 - 175.6, n=7) 44%
4K-64 Read	1298	1400 8%	582 -55%	2093 61%	2096 61%	256.5 -80%	215.9 -83%	961 ?(455 - 1298, n=7) -26%
4K-64 Write	909	2216 144%	849 -7%	2009 121%	2455 170%	242.8 -73%	1475 62%	794 ?(262 - 977, n=7) -13%
Access Time Read *	0.112	0.04 64%	0.036 68%	0.046 59%	0.068 39%	0.15 -34%		0.07567 ?(0.053 - 0.112, n=6) 32%
Access Time Write *	0.04	0.102 -155%	0.112 -180%	0.086 -115%	0.043 -8%	0.353 -783%	0.105 -163%	0.048 ?(0.028 - 0.077, n=7) -20%
Score Read	1598	1742 9%	768 -52%	2449 53%	2437 53%	478 -70%	466 -71%	1223 ?(682 - 1598, n=7) -23%
Score Write	1121	2505 123%	1174 5%	2410 115%	2797 150%	387 -65%	814 -27%	1059 ?(533 - 1238, n=7) -6%
Score Total	3464	5088 47%	2372 -32%	6095 76%	6452 86%	1033 -70%	2513 -27%	2869 ?(1552 - 3464, n=7) -17%
Copy ISO MB/s	1853	2076 12%	1660 -10%	1799 -3%		278.1 -85%	1698 -8%	1694 ?(974 - 2549, n=6) -9%
Copy Program MB/s	377.9	879 133%	443.5 17%	750 98%		282.3 -25%	284.7 -25%	479 ?(349 - 682, n=6) 27%
Copy Game MB/s	948	1855 96%	1162 23%	1830 93%		284.2 -70%	786 -17%	1023 ?(621 - 1428, n=6) 8%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		35% / 37%	3% / -0%	46% / 48%	61% / 61%	-69% / -79%	-5% / -9%	-1% / -0%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB

Sequential Read: 1945 MB/s

Sequential Write: 1638 MB/s

512K Read: 1418 MB/s

512K Write: 1455 MB/s

4K Read: 44.2 MB/s

4K Write: 114.7 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 447.7 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 486.8 MB/s

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

图形卡

除了iGPU，华硕Zephyrus G14还提供一个NvidiaGeForce RTX 3050 Ti笔记本 GPU。后者有自己的4GB GDDR6内存的VRAM，它提供的性能与老款华硕Zephyrus G14配备的GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q

显卡大致相同。对两款最新的Zephyrus G14笔记本电脑进行的正面比较显示，RTX 3050 Ti变体比配备RTX 3060的型号慢了约20%。

更多的比较和基准测试，请参考我们的GPU基准测试文章。

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72070, n=229, last 2 years)	40173 Points +102%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	33833 Points +70%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	30339 Points +53%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	29247 Points +47%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS	22063 Points +11%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	21105 Points +6%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS	19866 Points
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	19746 Points -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (7952 - 20905, n=27)	17562 Points -12%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 193851, n=142, last 2 years)	135868 Points +108%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	91295 Points +40%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS	77108 Points +18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (30158 - 102432, n=23)	67913 Points +4%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	66445 Points +2%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS	65354 Points
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	64056 Points -2%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	62748 Points -4%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=233, last 2 years)	29268 Points +105%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	23373 Points +64%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	20966 Points +47%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS	18436 Points +29%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	15650 Points +10%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	14696 Points +3%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS	14262 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (7917 - 15611, n=26)	13090 Points -8%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22547, n=231, last 2 years)	11960 Points +108%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	9768 Points +70%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	8513 Points +48%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	8286 Points +44%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS	7234 Points +26%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	5850 Points +2%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS	5748 Points
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	5594 Points -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (3744 - 6122, n=27)	5177 Points -10%

3DMark 11 Performance		18119 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		89363 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		40627 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		13132 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		6767 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		6074 points
Help

... in comparison

游戏性能

我们的Zephyrus G14的游戏性能与内置GPU的性能等级相一致。正如预期的那样，配备更强大的GPU（如RTX 3060或RTX 3070）的对比设备更快。尽管如此，我们的评测样本不需要在竞争中退缩，因为大多数游戏都可以在最大细节下流畅地玩。然而，如果用户不想在细节上做出妥协，他们将不得不在较新的游戏中牺牲原生的WQHD分辨率。

The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Gaming (54.1 - 718, n=127, last 2 years)	421 fps +65%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	381.1 (53.1^min, 150^P0.1, 271^P1 - 599.4^max) fps +49%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	288.3 (261^min - 335^max) fps +13%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	267 (242^min - 295^max) fps +5%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	262 (13.6^min, 55.8^P0.1, 173^P1 - 396^max) fps +3%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	255 (55^min, 90.1^P0.1, 167^P1 - 510^max) fps
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q	232.2 fps -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (75 - 297, n=20)	218 fps -15%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming (17.5 - 449, n=165, last 2 years)	218 fps +116%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	164.2 (155^min - 176^max) fps +63%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	141 (52^min, 64.6^P0.1, 93.3^P1 - 280^max) fps +40%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	127.9 (117^min - 136^max) fps +27%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	122.1 (44.1^min, 61^P0.1, 101.2^P1 - 279.5^max) fps +21%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	102 (87^min) fps +1%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	101 (20.4^min, 59.3^P0.1, 77.6^P1 - 264^max) fps
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q	100.6 fps 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (30 - 110, n=26)	88.8 fps -12%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=225, last 2 years)	116.1 fps +119%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	88.6 (79^min - 96^max) fps +67%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	81.5 (41.7^min, 44.8^P0.1, 58.7^P1 - 177^max) fps +54%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	80.9 (70^min) fps +53%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	68.3 (63^min - 72^max) fps +29%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q	58.4 fps +10%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	56 (46^min) fps +6%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	53 (48.6^min, 56.6^P0.1, 76^P1 - 221^max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (19 - 58.5, n=29)	47.5 fps -10%

Witcher 3中的帧率没有显示任何不规则现象，并且在整个期间保持稳定。这意味着更长的游戏时间对Zephyrus G14来说是没有问题的。

The Witcher 3 FPS diagram

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC R9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø52.9 (51-55)

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD
GTA V (2015)	176	169	124	71.6
The Witcher 3 (2015)	255		101	53
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	144.8	139.4	121.4	116
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	127	74.2	53.1		53.1
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	97.8	85.1	71.5
Strange Brigade (2018)	226	133	112	97.5
Doom Eternal (2020)	201	121	115	112	80.9
F1 2020 (2020)	236	144	123	92	68.9
F1 2021 (2021)	230	145	122	62.3	43.1
New World (2021)	84.3	66.2	62.6	45.1	31.3
FIFA 22 (2021)	192	177	171	163	130

排放

噪声排放

登记的噪音排放显示，我们的华硕笔记本电脑在空闲使用和低负荷时相对安静，为33.3 dB(A)。在使用电池供电的情况下，甚至可以实现无声操作。然而，在负载情况下，两个风扇会大幅增加，我们在压力测试中测得的最高值为46.8分贝（A）。

Noise Level

Idle		33.3 / 33.3 / 33.3 dB(A)
Load		36.1 / 48.6 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30.5 dB(A)

温度

总的来说，Zephyrus G14的紧凑设计导致负载下的机箱温度很高。在压力测试中，我们在两个点上测得的温度超过50℃（约122°F）。因此，当设备放在腿上时，你不应该大量使用它；相反，你应该选择一个坚实的表面，以便笔记本电脑在底部可以吸入足够的新鲜空气。这也得益于底座的结构，当显示屏打开时，设备的后侧会略微抬高。闲置时的表面温度稍好，尽管它们仍然高于平均水平，在几个点上超过40℃（约104°F）。

在负载测试中，SoC升温到略低于88°C（约190°F），这仍然是可以接受的。在我们的测试中，我们测量到GPU的最大热点温度为93°C（约199°F），这也是在合理范围内。我们无法确定在我们的评测样本中由温度引起的节流现象。

华硕Zephyrus G14 GA401Q的压力测试（FurMark + Prime95）。

Max. Load

Idle


44.9 °C	53.3 °C	44.9 °C
42.5 °C	53.6 °C	44.3 °C
34.4 °C	30.8 °C	33.2 °C

Maximum: 53.6 °C
Average: 42.4 °C


36 °C	49.9 °C	37 °C
44.4 °C	49.1 °C	36 °C
32.4 °C	32.8 °C	32.2 °C

Maximum: 49.9 °C
Average: 38.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 40.4 °C | Room Temperature 22.7 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53.6 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.9 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.9 °C / 100 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.4 °C / 93.9 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.5 °C / -9.9 F).

发言人

Zephyrus G14的扬声器提供了一个好的结果，比预期的好。这方面的原因可以很快找到：除了两个2.5瓦的扬声器，还有两个0.7瓦的高音扬声器。这使得高频和低频听起来更加平衡。同时，最大音量是一个小的批评点。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理

能源消耗

在功耗方面，特别版在空闲使用方面略微落后，这是由于WQHD面板和显示盖上的照明所致。然而，与同类产品相比，Zephyrus G14非常节俭，消耗量为8至16瓦。该设备在负载下也相当温和，最大消耗为136瓦。电源适配器可提供高达180瓦的功率。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.12 / 0.8 Watt
Idle	8.1 / 12.9 / 16.1 Watt
Load	102.4 / 135.8 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC R9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB, IPS, 2560x1440, 14.00	Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM R9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00	Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV R9 4900HS, GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00	Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS, 2560x1440, 14.00	SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60	Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		11%	11%	-21%	-75%	-9%	-10%	0%	-55%
Idle Minimum *	8.1	5.6 31%	5.5 32%	9.4 -16%	23 -184%	8 1%	8.8 -9%	8.2 ?(2.6 - 23, n=25) -1%	13.8 ?(2 - 64, n=179, last 2 years) -70%
Idle Average *	12.9	10.4 19%	9.3 28%	15.8 -22%	25 -94%	12 7%	13 -1%	12.6 ?(6.5 - 25, n=25) 2%	19.1 ?(8 - 67, n=179, last 2 years) -48%
Idle Maximum *	16.1	18 -12%	15.8 2%	24.1 -50%	29 -80%	22 -37%	14.6 9%	17.2 ?(7.9 - 30, n=25) -7%	26.8 ?(9 - 101.1, n=179, last 2 years) -66%
Load Average *	102.4	68 34%	92.2 10%	76.8 25%	106 -4%	98 4%	133 -30%	92 ?(45.9 - 129, n=25) 10%	110.9 ?(32.1 - 202, n=178, last 2 years) -8%
Load Maximum *	135.8	158.2 -16%	156.6 -15%	189.7 -40%	156 -15%	162 -19%	164 -21%	139.1 ?(63 - 195, n=25) -2%	250 ?(64.5 - 418, n=177, last 2 years) -84%
Witcher 3 ultra *		113	112.4	154	128	152	134

* ... smaller is better

Energy consumption during The Witcher 3 / stress test

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC: Ø135.7 (120-144)

电池寿命

电池寿命通常是游戏笔记本电脑的一个弱点。Zephyrus G14则完全不同。我们的评测样本在所有与电池运行时间有关的测试中都能提供非常好的结果。在我们的实际Wi-Fi测试中，76Wh的电池为该设备提供了11小时的能量。

亮度被降低到83%，以达到我们的标准值150cd/m²。对于Zephyrus G14来说，即使是一个漫长的电影之夜也不成问题。

想在移动中使用该设备进行游戏的用户应该记住，CPU和GPU的性能在一定程度上会受到电池电量的限制。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		19h 04min
WiFi Websurfing (EDGE: 94.0.992.38)		11h 14min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (EDGE: 94.0.992.38)		10h 37min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		10h 16min
Load (maximum brightness)		2h 41min

	Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC R9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 76 Wh	Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM R9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh	Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV R9 4900HS, GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, 76 Wh	Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 62 Wh	SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 49 Wh	MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 57.5 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		-12%	-15%	-38%	-66%	-54%	-49%	-45%
Reader / Idle	1144	1262 10%	1140 0%	828 -28%	387 -66%	547 -52%	552 -52%	544 ?(57 - 1290, n=84, last 2 years) -52%
H.264	616						413 -33%	399 ?(56 - 747, n=91, last 2 years) -35%
WiFi v1.3	674	710 5%	577 -14%	439 -35%	235 -65%	317 -53%	340 -50%	368 ?(57 - 745, n=181, last 2 years) -45%
Load	161	81 -50%	109 -32%	79 -51%	54 -66%	70 -57%	62 -61%	84.2 ?(36 - 173, n=143, last 2 years) -48%

Pros

+ 具有矩阵式LED显示的伟大设计

+ 良好的维护选项；1个SODIMM，1个M.2 2280 PCIe 3

+ 舒适的按键和良好的反馈

+ 非常高的CPU性能

+ 120 Hz 1440p面板和高色域覆盖率

+ 电池寿命长

Cons

- 负载下的表面温度非常高

- 不支持外部GPU扩展坞

- 没有单独的RGB键背光，甚至没有RGB照明

- 没有网络摄像头

评语 - 设计亮点和良好性能

在审查中。华硕Zephyrus G14 Alan Walker特别版，由AMD德国提供

华硕Zephyrus G14在特别版中采用了Alan Walker的设计，即使在关闭状态下也能吸引人们的注意力，是一款真正吸引人的产品。在使用时，1215个AniMe矩阵LED在显示盖上提供了另一个亮点。这是一个很好的噱头，但用户看不到它，因此很快就会被遗忘。

坚固的引擎盖上有一个快速的AMD SoC和一个专用的Nvidia显卡的稳固组合。八核Ryzen处理器在测试中能够提供良好的性能。Ryzen 9 5900HS并不比采用当前英特尔处理器的对比设备差。GeForce RTX 3050 Ti笔记本GPU是最小的移动RTX显卡。尽管如此，用它可以顺利地玩现代游戏。

内置显示器很好，它提供了同样好的色域覆盖。然而，亮度可以更好一点。总的来说，WQHD显示屏是Zephyrus G14 的全高清面板的一个非常好的替代品，我们最近也对其进行了审查。在建造质量方面没有什么可抱怨的。然而，可用的连接肯定会成为一个问题，因为现有的两个USB Type-A端口可以很快被占用。不过仍有两个Type-C端口，其中一个还提供额外的功能，如DisplayPort和Power Delivery。缺乏读卡器或网络摄像头是用户在购买Zephyrus G14时不得不忍受的方面。

华硕Zephyrus G14 Alan Walker特别版因其1215个AniMe矩阵LED而吸引了人们的目光。

通过Zephyrus G14，华硕提供了一个非常持久的设备，这在游戏笔记本电脑中相当罕见。内存可以扩展，但我们希望看到增加另一个大容量存储设备的选项。

如果你正在寻找14英寸游戏笔记本领域的替代品，不幸的是，你没有很多选择。这里应该提到华硕Zephyrus G14，配备RTX 3060笔记本GPU。它提供了更好的GPU性能，但你必须放弃特殊的Alan Walker设计。Razer Blade 14也是另一款现代的14英寸游戏笔记本电脑，其引擎盖下有最新的Ryzen CPU和RTX 3070笔记本电脑GPU。

价格和可用性

在撰写本文时，华硕Zephyrus G14 Alan Walker特别版可直接从制造商

。只有一个配置选项（与我们的评论相同），售价为1,999.99美元。</span>

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC - 2021-10-08 10/08/2021 v7
Sebastian Bade

Chassis

84 / 98 → 86%

Keyboard

81%

Pointing Device

85%

Connectivity

51 / 80 → 64%

Weight

66 / 10-66 → 100%

Battery

87 / 95 → 92%

Display

83%

Games Performance

92%

Application Performance

95%

Temperature

80 / 95 → 84%

Noise

74 / 90 → 83%

Audio

81%

Average

74%

83%

Gaming - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Stephanie Chamberlain - Translator - 571 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020

contact me via: LinkedIn

Translator: Stefan Hinum - Founder, CEO, CFO - 22299 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2006

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华硕Zephyrus G14 GA401Q评测。阿兰-沃克特别版14英寸游戏笔记本

Sebastian Bade, 2021-10-16 (Update: 2021-10-16)

华硕Zephyrus G14 GA401Q评测。阿兰-沃克特别版14英寸游戏笔记本

Possible contenders in comparison

案例

Size comparison

连接性

显示器 - WQHD和120赫兹

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能--Ryzen 9遇到RTX 3050 Ti

处理器

Cinebench R15 Multi endurance test

系统性能

DPC延迟

储存

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

游戏性能

The Witcher 3 FPS diagram

排放

噪声排放

温度

发言人

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC audio analysis

Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 audio analysis

能源管理

能源消耗

Energy consumption during The Witcher 3 / stress test

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

评语 - 设计亮点和良好性能

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare