Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
MagyarRazer Blade 14 2024 笔记本电脑评测：搭载 Ryzen AI，面向未来
由于 2023 款 Blade 14 已经是 2022 款的重大更新，最新的 2024 款相对于 2023 款只是小幅更新。最新版本将 2023 型号上的 "凤凰 "Ryzen 9 7940HS CPU 替换为 "鹰点 "Ryzen 9 8945HS。除此之外，2024 机型的其他方面几乎都与 2023 机型相同，因此我们建议您查看上关于 2023 机型的评测 ，以了解有关 Blade 14 物理特性的更多信息。
我们的测试机是最高端的配置，配备了上述 Zen 4 CPU、32 GB 可移动 DDR5-5600 内存、140 WGeForce RTX 4070 GPU 和 1600p 240 Hz IPS 显示屏，售价约为 2700 美元。较少的 SKU 则配备 RTX 4060，但所有 2024 配置都配备相同的 Ryzen 9 CPU 和显示屏。只有配备 RTX 4070 图形处理器的 "水银 "色选项才可用。
刀锋 14 的替代品包括其他 14 英寸游戏笔记本电脑，如联想Legion Slim 5 14 ，宏碁掠夺者 Triton 14 ，戴尔 Alienware x14 ，或流行的华硕 Zephyrus G14 。
更多 Razer 评论：
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 89.7 % | 02/2024 | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 17.99 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 88.7 % | 06/2023 | Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 1.8 kg | 17.99 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 92.8 % | 11/2023 | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core, M3 Max 40-Core GPU | 1.6 kg | 15.5 mm | 14.20" | 3024x1964 | |
| 87.7 % | 09/2023 | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 1.7 kg | 20.79 mm | 14.50" | 2880x1600 | |
| 87.3 % | 07/2023 | Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 1.7 kg | 19.81 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 90 % | 05/2023 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 1.7 kg | 20.5 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 89.4 % | 05/2023 | Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 1.4 kg | 17 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 |
交流
为了兼容 Wi-Fi 7，无线模块已从高通 WCN685x 升级到高通 FastConnect 7800。由于 Wi-Fi 7 路由器尚未普及，绝大多数用户不会受益于该芯片的新功能。因此，加入该芯片更多的是为了在用户决定将家庭网络升级到 Wi-Fi 7 时为未来做好准备。
与华硕 AXE11000 Wi-Fi 6E 测试路由器配对时，我们没有遇到任何连接问题或不稳定问题。
网络摄像头
维护
2024 和 2023 型号之间没有重大的内部差异。
显示屏 - 用于游戏和内容创建的 IPS
有趣的是，今年的 Blade 14 型号的面板与去年的型号（TL140ADXP04-0 与 B140QAN06.U）不同。用我们的色度计测量，新面板的亮度稍暗一些，但包括快速响应时间、DCI-P3 全彩、240 Hz 刷新率和 ~1300:1 对比度在内的其他性能基本保持不变，可提供与去年类似的观看体验。
需要注意的是，和去年的机型一样，它支持 FreeSync Premium，但不支持 G-Sync。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 484.1 cd/m²
Contrast: 1274:1 (Black: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.23 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.74
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
85% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 TL140ADXP04-0, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.00 | Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 AU Optronics B140QAN06.U, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.00 | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.20 | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 Samsung SDC ATNA45AF02-2, OLED, 2880x1600, 14.50 | Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 BOE NE140QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.00 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY B140QAN06.S, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 14.00 | Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Samsung SDC4192 (ATNA40YK14-0), OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 0% | 2% | 6% | 0% | 4% | 2% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 96.9 | 97.3 0% | 99.2 2% | 99.9 3% | 96.9 0% | 99.6 3% | 99.8 3% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.8 | 99.8 0% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 85 | 85.3 0% | 96.5 14% | 85.5 1% | 93.4 10% | 88.7 4% | |
| Response Times | -47% | -1048% | 88% | -61% | -103% | 66% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 6 ? | 11.9 ? -98% | 80.8 ? -1247% | 0.79 ? 87% | 15.1 ? -152% | 17.2 ? -187% | 2.4 ? 60% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 8.3 ? | 8 ? 4% | 78.8 ? -849% | 1.01 ? 88% | 5.8 ? 30% | 9.9 ? -19% | 2.4 ? 71% |
| PWM Frequency | 14878 ? | 240.5 ? | 5430 | 300 | |||
| Screen | -51% | 18% | -22% | -45% | 19% | 50% | |
| Brightness middle | 484.1 | 559.3 16% | 610 26% | 377.5 -22% | 547 13% | 535 11% | 423 -13% |
| Brightness | 466 | 560 20% | 600 29% | 381 -18% | 516 11% | 563 21% | 427 -8% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 88 -1% | 96 8% | 97 9% | 88 -1% | 91 2% | 98 10% |
| Black Level * | 0.38 | 0.44 -16% | 0.56 -47% | 0.1 74% | |||
| Contrast | 1274 | 1271 0% | 977 -23% | 4230 232% | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.23 | 4.44 -99% | 1.7 24% | 4.19 -88% | 3.28 -47% | 1 55% | 0.55 75% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.57 | 9.3 -104% | 2.3 50% | 7.02 -54% | 8.57 -88% | 2.8 39% | 1.15 75% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.74 | 0.39 47% | 0.81 -9% | 1.09 -47% | 1.15 -55% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 6.8 -325% | 2.1 -31% | 1.2 25% | 4.4 -175% | 1.8 -13% | 0.69 57% |
| Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.3 96% | 2.22 99% | 2.22 99% | 2.168 101% | 2.24 98% | 2.42 91% |
| CCT | 6816 95% | 6242 104% | 6874 95% | 6296 103% | 7767 84% | 6337 103% | 6479 100% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -33% /
-40% | -343% /
-221% | 24% /
3% | -35% /
-38% | -27% /
-7% | 39% /
42% |
* ... smaller is better
所有设备都经过预校准，以更好地利用面板的广泛色彩覆盖范围。如下文的 CalMAN 结果所示，我们的特定设备在 P3 标准下的平均灰度和色彩 deltaE 值分别仅为 1.6 和 2.23。因此，对于大多数用户来说，不需要进行最终用户校准。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前，我们通过预装的 Synapse 软件将系统设置为 Turbo 模式和 dGPU 模式。如果设置为平衡模式，性能会降低，详见 GPU 性能部分。
Synapse 今年新增了 MUX 切换功能，而 2023 型号上的旧版本没有这个选项。电源配置文件也进行了精简，新增加了 "Turbo "选项，而不是 CPU 和 GPU 的单独设置。
伪装的 Ryzen 9 7940HS 处理器
... Ryzen 9 8945HS是重新命名的 Ryzen 9 7940HS的核心。这两款处理器的目标时钟频率相似，缓存大小和核心数量相同，都是在相同的 Zen 4 平台下制造的。因此，这两款处理器在 CPU 密集型基准测试中取得几乎完全相同的成绩也就不足为奇了。对于视频编码、文件压缩或游戏等传统任务而言，2024 Blade 14 与 2023 型号相比最多只能算是略胜一筹。
Ryzen 9 8945HS 和 7940HS 的主要区别在于，新处理器集成的 NPU 速度更快，可以启用 Windows Studio 特效，如网络摄像头自动取景、眼神矫正和背景模糊等。不过，基于英特尔处理器的笔记本电脑至少在一年前就具备了这些功能，因此它们并不新鲜。自动取景功能与 Razer 的低分辨率 200 万像素网络摄像头也不匹配；惠普提供了相同的功能，但配备了分辨率更高的 500 万像素网络摄像头，可实现更清晰的平移和缩放。
除了 Windows Studio Effects 之外，Ryzen 9 8945HS 中集成的 NPU 还可以在本地运行 Microsoft Co-Pilot，而不是依赖云和互联网连接。通过这种方式，几乎可以瞬间生成结果，而旧处理器则需要数秒。遗憾的是，截至目前，Co-Pilot 完全基于云，没有本地或离线运行的选项，这意味着你甚至无法使用新的 NPU 来完成其设计目的。当然，未来人工智能应用成熟后，这种情况有望改变，但截至 2024 年初，NPU 的功能还非常有限。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (27901 - 28836, n=2) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (117965 - 122633, n=2) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (4953 - 5077, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (120362 - 125044, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (15412 - 15661, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (63061 - 65746, n=2) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (89541 - 90828, n=2) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (1116 - 1135, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (14947 - 15588, n=2) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (38569 - 40815, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
压力测试
仔细观察系统的实时性能，我们就会明白为什么 2024 机型的 GPU 性能始终优于 2023 机型，尽管两者都使用了相同的 RTX 4070 显卡。当在 Turbo 模式下运行游戏时，较新的 Blade 14 的 GPU 将稳定在 114 W 的较高 TGP 上，而去年的型号仅为 87 W。因此，更新机型的 GPU 时钟率（2550 MHz 对 2310 MHz）和核心温度（76 C 对 67 C）都更高。降到平衡模式后，TGP 和 GPU 时钟率将分别略微降低到 103 W 和 2475 MHz，但温度和风扇噪音也随之降低，从而带来更安静的游戏体验。
需要注意的是，虽然 Razer 宣传的最大 TGP 为 140 W，但这一目标在大多数情况下是不可持续的。相反，2024 Blade 14 在游戏时 GPU 的恒定功率为 114 W，这是更准确的预期。
在运行 Prime95 压力测试时，Ryzen 9 8945HS CPU 的核心时钟频率、温度和封装功耗几乎与去年机型的 Ryzen 9 7940HS 相同。这一结果补充了我们在 CineBench 上的观察结果，在 CineBench 上，两款处理器的性能数据几乎完全相同。Turbo Core 时钟频率、温度和功耗分别在 4.7 GHz、97 C 和 90 W 时达到峰值，仅在压力测试的最初几秒钟才会下降并稳定在稍低的值，如下表所示。
系统性能
PCMark 结果与 2023 机型的差距仅为个位数百分点，这表明浏览和轻度编辑等日常任务在最新机型上并没有明显加快。不过，内存性能始终比以前更快，这有助于提升游戏性能，哪怕只是微弱的提升。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (7436 - 8312, n=2) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (9861 - 11290, n=2) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (9502 - 10332, n=2) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (11907 - 13363, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1767 - 1830, n=2) | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1686 - 1783, n=2) | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1935 - 1960, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1489 - 1672, n=2) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (303 - 324, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (250 - 269, n=2) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (488 - 509, n=2) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 8312 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (68755 - 68976, n=2) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (49966 - 61429, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (87253 - 93153, n=2) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (95.4 - 110.4, n=2) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
虽然 LatencyMon 的结果与去年的机型相当，但 4k60 视频回放的情况更糟。在 60 秒的时间范围内，我们能记录到 6 个丢帧，而 2023 型号则为 0。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
该系统配备的三星 PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR PCIe4 x4 NVMe 固态硬盘与去年的 Blade 14 相同，没有重大变化。不过，如果能支持 PCIe5 x4 固态硬盘就更好了。
| Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
尽管运行的是与 2023 型号相同的 140 W 移动GeForce RTX 4070 GPU，3DMark 图形分数却提高了近 10%。其成绩甚至一直高于配备相同 RTX 4070 GPU 的微星 Raider GE68 HX。请注意，系统必须在 "性能 "模式下才能获得比预期更好的成绩。否则，根据我们的Fire Strike 结果表，在平衡模式下运行会导致整体性能下降多达 11%。
| 电源配置文件 | 图形得分 | 物理得分 | 综合得分 |
| 性能模式 | 33451 | 29228 | 14940 |
| 均衡模式 | 32305 (-4%) | 28019 (-4%) | 13356 (-11%) |
| 电池电量 | 21602 (-35%) | 24961 (-15%) | 8881 (-41%) |
Blade 14 选择 RTX 4060 配置预计会影响 GPU 性能约 10%至 20%。遗憾的是，Razer 没有提供 RTX 4070 以外的图形选项，而竞争对手华硕 Zephyrus G14 则可以升级到 RTX 4090，以获得更高的性能和两倍的 VRAM。
| 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG | |
| MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| MSI Raider GE68 HX 13VG, i7-13700HX -1! | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF -1! | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 -2! | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 -2! | |
| Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU -2! | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 35995 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 29200 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 12924 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
与 2023 机型相比，绝大多数测试游戏在 2024 Blade 14 上的运行速度都略快于上述 3DMark 分数。像《最终幻想 15》或《赛博朋克 2077》这样对 GPU 要求较高的游戏运行速度往往会稍快一些，而像《DOTA 2 重生》或《GTA V》这样对 GPU 要求较低的老游戏则没有任何改进。
4K 游戏是有可能实现的，尽管只有采用 DLSS 和帧生成技术来提高帧率的游戏才能令人满意。以《赛博朋克 2077》为例，在最大原生 4K 设置下，平均帧数仅为 5.8 FPS，而如果同时启用 DLSS Auto 和帧生成功能，则平均帧数为 41 FPS。
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
| GTA V (2015) | 183.1 | 179 | 169 | 109.9 | 92.3 | 90.1 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 313.8 | 277.3 | 228.7 | 116.8 | 69.4 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 165.3 | 149.8 | 145.3 | 136.1 | 119.6 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 212 | 166.2 | 121.5 | 89 | 48.5 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 109.9 | 101.9 | 76.8 | 65.2 | ||
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 138 | 133 | 123 | 114 | 61 | |
| Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 239.8 | 201.5 | 137.8 | 107.7 | 73.7 | 35.2 |
| F1 22 (2022) | 247 | 240 | 217 | 84.2 | 55.1 | 26.3 |
| Star Wars Jedi Survivor (2023) | 99.8 | 91.7 | 86.5 | 80.1 | 51.1 | 24.2 |
| F1 23 (2023) | 235 | 240 | 206 | 77 | 49 | 23 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 162.1 | 136.5 | 89.2 | 71.3 | 54.4 | 34.5 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 142.5 | 118.9 | 100.2 | 88.6 | 52.1 | 22.5 |
| Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023 (2023) | 180 | 158 | 124 | 114 | 82 | 50 |
| Avatar Frontiers of Pandora (2023) | 101 | 94 | 82 | 62 | 41 | 20 |
排放量
系统噪音
风扇噪音的表现与我们在 2023 机型上观察到的大致相同，但由于上述功率曲线的变化而略有不同。例如，在平衡模式下运行时 Witcher 3例如，在平衡模式下运行时，风扇噪音会稳定在 43.2 dB(A)。但是，如果使用 Turbo 模式，风扇噪音会明显增大，在 46 至 50 dB(A) 之间。在平衡模式下进行游戏时，性能差距相对较小，只有几个百分点，因此如果风扇噪音是个问题，用户可以考虑使用该模式，而不是 Turbo 模式。
50 dB(A) 的低噪音范围使 Blade 14 与竞争对手 Zephyrus G14和其他大型游戏笔记本电脑的 "高性能 "模式。如果声音太大，我们建议使用平衡模式玩游戏，然后在支持的情况下启用 DLSS，这样既能提高性能，又能降低风扇噪音。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 25 / 25 / 25 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 33 / 51.9 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.3 dB(A) | ||
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 8945HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP2048Z | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N | Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 2% | 7% | -7% | -7% | -10% | -3% | |
| off / environment * | 24.3 | 22.7 7% | 24.8 -2% | 22.8 6% | 25 -3% | 23.3 4% | 24 1% |
| Idle Minimum * | 25 | 23.4 6% | 24.8 1% | 22.8 9% | 27 -8% | 23.6 6% | 24 4% |
| Idle Average * | 25 | 23.4 6% | 24.8 1% | 27.3 -9% | 29 -16% | 23.6 6% | 24 4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 25 | 23.4 6% | 24.8 1% | 30.7 -23% | 31 -24% | 33 -32% | 35.71 -43% |
| Load Average * | 33 | 33 -0% | 25.8 22% | 41.6 -26% | 42 -27% | 49.5 -50% | |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 49.5 | 51.8 -5% | 43.4 12% | 52.8 -7% | 43 13% | 52.2 -5% | 40.22 19% |
| Load Maximum * | 51.9 | 55.6 -7% | 43.4 16% | 52.6 -1% | 45 13% | 52.2 -1% | 51.93 -0% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
由于风扇在没有高负荷运行时往往比较慵懒，因此即使在桌面上空转，表面温度也相当高。因此，在浏览网页或播放视频时，系统的平均温度比其他超极本要高，但更安静的风扇是一个很好的权衡。
请记住，如前所述，Razer 的交流适配器会比市场上大多数其他交流适配器温度更高。为了安全起见，您需要提防接触到任何敏感材料或电线。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.2 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.4 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.4 °C / 86.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.5 °C / -2.7 F).
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 9% | 15% | 6% | -9% | 7% | 8% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 41.8 | 37.4 11% | 45.9 -10% | 40.4 3% | 54 -29% | 47 -12% | 42 -0% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 42.2 | 35.2 17% | 42.1 -0% | 49.4 -17% | 56 -33% | 46.5 -10% | 52 -23% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 34.8 | 33.2 5% | 23.4 33% | 28.2 19% | 31 11% | 25.9 26% | 26 25% |
| Idle Bottom * | 37.4 | 36.2 3% | 23.8 36% | 29.8 20% | 31 17% | 28 25% | 27 28% |
* ... smaller is better
| CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | GPU 平均温度(°C) | |
| 系统闲置 | -- | -- | 46 | 45 |
| Prime95 压力 | 4.4 | -- | 87 | 49 |
| Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 4.1 | 1980 | 90 | 75 |
| Witcher 3 压力（涡轮增压模式） | ~1.1 | 2550 | 81 | 76 |
| Witcher 3 压力（平衡模式） | ~0.8 | 2475 | 59 | 69 |
发言人
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
可以说，GPU 性能的逐年提升并不是 "免费 "的，因为 2024 款 Blade 14 在游戏时的耗电量要比 2023 款稍高一些。例如，运行Witcher 3 时，功耗会比以前高出 9% 至 10%，这也许并非巧合，而是与 2024 机型 GPU 性能提升 9% 至 10% 相吻合。
根据亮度和 MUX 设置的不同，在台式机上空转耗电在 20 W 到 32 W 之间。从最低亮度跳到最高亮度将多耗电约 5 瓦，而启用 dGPU 模式将多耗电 7 瓦。
| Off / Standby | 0.61 / 1.5 Watt |
| Idle | 20.9 / 25.6 / 32.1 Watt |
| Load |
72.7 / 228.4 Watt |
   
| |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.00 | Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.00 | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core, M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP2048Z, Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.20 | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N, OLED, 2880x1600, 14.50 | Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.00 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 14.00 | Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 5% | 45% | 36% | 22% | 26% | 51% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 20.9 | 19.5 7% | 2.6 88% | 7.3 65% | 12 43% | 9.4 55% | 7.4 65% |
| Idle Average * | 25.6 | 24.7 4% | 11.8 54% | 9.6 62% | 14 45% | 14.2 45% | 8.3 68% |
| Idle Maximum * | 32.1 | 27 16% | 12.2 62% | 17.3 46% | 26 19% | 14.5 55% | 8.7 73% |
| Load Average * | 72.7 | 83.2 -14% | 99.9 -37% | 76.6 -5% | 88 -21% | 79 -9% | 76 -5% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 182.1 | 165.8 9% | 92.5 49% | 152 17% | 114.9 37% | 172 6% | 70 62% |
| Load Maximum * | 228.4 | 204.5 10% | 101.7 55% | 160.9 30% | 213 7% | 220.8 3% | 132 42% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
电池续航时间略高于 7 小时，比去年的型号延长了近一个小时。请记住，当使用电池时，Synapse 会自动将刷新率从 240 Hz 改为 60 Hz，以延长运行时间。否则，我们 2024 型号的电池续航时间将更接近 2023 型号的结果。
使用专有交流适配器从空载充电到满载需要 90 到 120 分钟。支持通过第三方 USB-C 适配器充电，但和去年的机型一样，最高只能充电 140 W，尽管 配备 240 瓦 USB-C 充电器的笔记本电脑市场上已经有配备 240 W USB-C 充电器的笔记本电脑。令人遗憾的是，既然有通用的 240 W USB-C 接口可供选择，Blade 14 却仍然依赖于专有的 240 W 充电接口。
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 68 Wh | Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 68 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core, M3 Max 40-Core GPU, 72.6 Wh | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 73.6 Wh | Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 76.3 Wh | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 63 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -8% | 57% | 16% | 20% | -7% | 25% | |
| Reader / Idle | 480 | 513 7% | 629 31% | 669 39% | 678 41% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 428 | 374 -13% | 911 113% | 448 5% | 302 -29% | 448 5% | 457 7% |
| Load | 72 | 59 -18% | 73 1% | 80 11% | 109 51% | 58 -19% | 92 28% |
| H.264 | 1077 | 539 | 431 |
Pros
Cons
结论--Ryzen 人工智能尚未解锁
到 2024 年初，从 Ryzen 9 7840HS 跳转到 8945HS就像从 Wi-Fi 6E 跳转到 Wi-Fi 7 一样微不足道。目前，大多数应用还没有完全利用 Ryzen AI 来使新处理器物有所值，就像大多数用户还没有 Wi-Fi 7 路由器来充分发挥 Wi-Fi 7 的优势一样。因此，对于绝大多数用户来说，购买 2024 Blade 14 更多是为了在日后 "解锁 "系统的 AI 和 Wi-Fi 7 功能。
2023 和 2024 机型之间更重要的区别在于新机型的 GPU 速度更快。2024 Blade 14 能以稍快的时钟频率运行相同的GeForce RTX 4070，性能提高 5%至 10%。因此，核心温度和功耗略高，但对于希望最大限度提高单位体积性能的性能猎人来说，这只是一个很小的代价。
如果你对 CPU AI 或 Wi-Fi 7 没有兴趣，那么 2024 Blade 14 的 GPU 性能小幅提升可能会赢得你的青睐。如果没有兴趣，那么外观相同的 2023 型号也能以更低的价格提供基本相同的性能。
虽然今年微不足道的升级是可以理解的，但我们希望在未来看到更多重大变化，比如改用通用的 240 W USB-C 充电、Windows VRR 以及支持 RTX 4080 或 4090 选项。竞品华硕 ROG Zephyrus G14 仍然是仅有的能够超越 Blade 14 的 14 英寸游戏笔记本电脑之一，因此很遗憾看到新款雷蛇再次以 RTX 4070 封顶。
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508
-
02/13/2024 v7
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.
Pricecompare
