Notebookcheck

华硕ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW (Core i7-9750H, RTX 2070) 笔记本电脑评测

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by Zewei Shen), 07/14/2019
Coffee Lake Geforce Gaming Laptop / Notebook

强大且轻薄。 轻薄游戏笔记本电脑是现在的潮流,技嘉,微星和Razer等都处于领先地位。 华硕现在已经更新了其GX502系列,但其超薄机身可以压住Core i7-9750H和GeForce RTX 2070吗?请仔细阅读,找出答案。

Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW (Zephyrus S GX502 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-9750H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop) - 8192 MB, Core: 1215 MHz, Memory: 7000 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 419.71, Optimus
Memory
32768 MB 
, DDR4-2666, 19-19-19-43, 双通道
Display
15.6 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, Full HD, 144 Hz, G-Sync, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel HM370
Storage
2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0), 1024 GB 
, 2 x M.2 2280 drive bays
Soundcard
Realtek ALC294 @ Intel Cannon Point PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm二合一接口
Networking
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 19 x 360 x 252
Battery
76 Wh Lithium-Ion, 4 cells
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 外接摄像头
Additional features
Speakers: 2.0, Keyboard: 巧克力键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, 230 W power supply, 3D sculpture for crafting, Asus Giftbox, Install, Hello, Keyboard Hotkeys, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.064 kg, Power Supply: 632 g
Price
17999元 ~ 2600 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

360 mm 252 mm 19 mm 2.1 kg359 mm 255 mm 18 mm 2.1 kg360 mm 268 mm 15.75 mm 2.1 kg356 mm 250 mm 18.9 mm 2.1 kg355 mm 235 mm 17.8 mm 2.1 kg
Left-hand side: ventilation grille, power connector, RJ45 LAN, HDMI 2.0, USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-A, microphone jack, headphone jack
Left-hand side: ventilation grille, power connector, RJ45 LAN, HDMI 2.0, USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-A, microphone jack, headphone jack
Right-hand side: USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-C, 2 x USB 3.0 Type-A, ventilation grille, Kensington lock slot
Right-hand side: USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-C, 2 x USB 3.0 Type-A, ventilation grille, Kensington lock slot
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
684 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
680 MBit/s ∼99%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
678 MBit/s ∼99% 0%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
671 MBit/s ∼98% -1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
661 MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 702, n=246)
604 MBit/s ∼88% -11%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Predator Triton 500
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
683 MBit/s ∼100% 0%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
683 MBit/s ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
680 MBit/s ∼100% 0%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
655 MBit/s ∼96% -4%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
644 MBit/s ∼94% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 730, n=246)
557 MBit/s ∼82% -18%
270
cd/m²
284
cd/m²
258
cd/m²
278
cd/m²
286
cd/m²
272
cd/m²
272
cd/m²
285
cd/m²
273
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED)
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 286 cd/m² Average: 275.3 cd/m² Minimum: 15 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 286 cd/m²
Contrast: 773:1 (Black: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.19 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1, calibrated: 2.27
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
91% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.41
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2, IPS, 1920x1080
Acer Predator Triton 500
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080
Response Times
-3%
-19%
-83%
-92%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
7.2 (3.8, 3.4)
7 (3.6, 3.4)
3%
8 (4, 4)
-11%
16.8 (9.2, 7.6)
-133%
16.4 (8.8, 7.6)
-128%
Response Time Black / White *
8.8 (4.4, 4.4)
9.6 (4.4, 5.2)
-9%
11.2 (6, 5.2)
-27%
11.6 (7.2, 4.4)
-32%
13.6 (8.4, 5.2)
-55%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-3%
-24%
-2%
12%
Brightness middle
286
323.6
13%
304
6%
314.7
10%
250
-13%
Brightness
275
315
15%
299
9%
312
13%
235
-15%
Brightness Distribution
90
91
1%
89
-1%
90
0%
85
-6%
Black Level *
0.37
0.29
22%
0.27
27%
0.38
-3%
0.29
22%
Contrast
773
1116
44%
1126
46%
828
7%
862
12%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.19
3.31
-51%
4.66
-113%
2.56
-17%
1.46
33%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.4
5.74
-30%
9.65
-119%
4.89
-11%
2.47
44%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.27
2.73
-20%
1.72
24%
1.71
25%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.2
2.9
-32%
5.53
-151%
3.4
-55%
1.27
42%
Gamma
2.41 91%
2.29 96%
2.5 88%
2.3 96%
2.4 92%
CCT
6405 101%
6765 96%
8028 81%
6435 101%
6749 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
59
59.7
1%
60
2%
60.7
3%
60
2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
91
91.8
1%
93
2%
94.6
4%
93
2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-3% / -3%
-22% / -24%
-43% / -15%
-40% / -5%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.4 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
7.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.8 ms rise
↘ 3.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (40 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9457 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
AS SSD Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark
LatencyMon
010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190Tooltip
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1040 (1017.76-1182)
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1072 (986.63-1110.9)
Acer Predator Triton 500 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø980 (961.82-1019.05)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
177 Points ∼100%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Intel Core i7-8750H
176 Points ∼99% -1%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points ∼98% -2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
168 Points ∼95% -5%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
166 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 212, n=492)
155 Points ∼88% -12%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
1182 Points ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
1156 Points ∼98% -2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
1122 Points ∼95% -5%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Intel Core i7-8750H
1019 Points ∼86% -14%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
999 Points ∼85% -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2022, n=495)
811 Points ∼69% -31%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
177 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1182 Points
Help
PCMark 10 - Score
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0)
5883 Points ∼100% +4%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
5654 Points ∼96%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5492 Points ∼93% -3%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5416 Points ∼92% -4%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
5353 Points ∼91% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7171, n=188)
5179 Points ∼88% -8%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
Acer Predator Triton 500
2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-29%
7%
-10%
-11%
Write 4K
97.04
93.92
-3%
93.6
-4%
93.88
-3%
97.13
0%
Read 4K
49.58
46.29
-7%
38.82
-22%
40.56
-18%
53.66
8%
Write Seq
1838
974.3
-47%
2455
34%
1468
-20%
1526
-17%
Read Seq
2421
1425
-41%
2107
-13%
1540
-36%
2020
-17%
Write 4K Q32T1
326.9
259.4
-21%
298.7
-9%
293.5
-10%
285.6
-13%
Read 4K Q32T1
372.9
296.5
-20%
338.7
-9%
346
-7%
321.8
-14%
Write Seq Q32T1
1894
976.7
-48%
2902
53%
1941
2%
1533
-19%
Read Seq Q32T1
2828
1666
-41%
3536
25%
3266
15%
2351
-17%
2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2828 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1894 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 372.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 326.9 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2421 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1838 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 49.58 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 97.04 MB/s
3DMark 11 Performance
18686 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
30754 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
16290 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
6890 points
Help
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0); The Witcher 3: Ø70 (63-76)
Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0); The Witcher 3: Ø76.1 (70-81)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8; The Witcher 3: Ø51.3 (44-61)
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
8171 Points ∼100% +12%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
7277 Points ∼89%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6728 Points ∼82% -8%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6562 Points ∼80% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (8153 - 13013, n=135)
5551 Points ∼68% -24%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
21237 Points ∼100% +11%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
19123 Points ∼90%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
18153 Points ∼85% -5%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
17598 Points ∼83% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=518)
11141 Points ∼52% -42%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
28997 Points ∼100% +19%
Acer Predator Triton 500
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
28083 Points ∼97% +16%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
24267 Points ∼84%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22723 Points ∼78% -6%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22089 Points ∼76% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=593)
13094 Points ∼45% -46%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
80.3 fps ∼100% +14%
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
76.5 (min: 63) fps ∼95% +9%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H
70.2 (min: 58) fps ∼87%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
68.9 fps ∼86% -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
58.3 (min: 48) fps ∼73% -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=287)
48.7 fps ∼61% -31%
low med. high ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 13070.2fps
Apex Legends (2019) 128126fps
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 9183fps
Metro Exodus (2019) 65.152.9fps
Anthem (2019) 8479fps
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) 12175fps
The Division 2 (2019) 9879fps
Anno 1800 (2019) 76.839.5fps

Noise Level

Idle
31 / 33 / 38 dB(A)
Load
50 / 56 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
4%
9%
17%
7%
7%
off / environment *
30
28.7
4%
29
3%
28.8
4%
30
-0%
29.4 (27.7 - 32, n=293)
2%
Idle Minimum *
31
29.8
4%
30
3%
28.8
7%
32
-3%
31.4 (28 - 41.7, n=716)
-1%
Idle Average *
33
32.4
2%
32
3%
28.8
13%
34
-3%
32.7 (28 - 46.6, n=716)
1%
Idle Maximum *
38
38
-0%
34
11%
29.4
23%
36
5%
34.7 (28 - 51, n=716)
9%
Load Average *
50
38.2
24%
44
12%
35.7
29%
42
16%
40.6 (30.3 - 58, n=717)
19%
Witcher 3 ultra *
53
56.6
-7%
46
13%
42.5
20%
44
17%
Load Maximum *
56
56.6
-1%
47
16%
45
20%
48
14%
47.9 (38.9 - 64.1, n=717)
14%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 52 °C54 °C50 °C 
 48 °C50 °C43 °C 
 38 °C36 °C33 °C 
Maximum: 54 °C
Average: 44.9 °C
41 °C41 °C44 °C
42 °C44 °C47 °C
33 °C35 °C33 °C
Maximum: 47 °C
Average: 40 °C
Power Supply (max.)  44 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.9 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 39.5 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 42.1 °C / 108 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-9.2 °C / -16.6 F).
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
6%
-3%
12%
-1%
6%
Maximum Upper Side *
54
47
13%
49
9%
49
9%
56
-4%
45.8 (28 - 68.8, n=682)
15%
Maximum Bottom *
47
48.6
-3%
58
-23%
49
-4%
66
-40%
49.5 (25.9 - 78, n=680)
-5%
Idle Upper Side *
33
28.8
13%
33
-0%
25.4
23%
27
18%
30.7 (21.6 - 46.8, n=633)
7%
Idle Bottom *
34
33.2
2%
33
3%
27.2
20%
27
21%
31.6 (21.1 - 50.3, n=631)
7%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2043.644.92539.640.43130.933.8403542.85028.335.9632635.88028.642.110028.757.412523.854.616022.957.420023.958.52502560.93152064.240019.16450017.965.163017.372.580016.975100017.177.8125018.576.7160017.874.9200017.474.1250017.467.7315017.676.8400017.583.3500017.484.2630017.279.8800017.271.61000017.266.5125001769.21600016.863.4SPL3090.2N1.481.4median 17.5median 69.2Delta1.8640.540.538.139.536.237.338.135.836.835.938.436.534.635.734.234.832.138.532.750.531.959.530.865.730.466.830.363.729.364.829.462.928.86629.165.228.468.528.469.428.368.228.47028.170.827.97327.969.12862.727.855.230.360.427.76727.565.540.780.5449.2median 28.8median 65.51.24hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus Zephyrus S GX502GWAsus Zephyrus S GX531GX
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.03 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.5 / 1.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 24 / 27 / 33 Watt
Load midlight 129 / 216 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
18%
20%
36%
31%
15%
Idle Minimum *
24
16.1
33%
16
33%
10.4
57%
16
33%
19.6 (3.5 - 113, n=677)
18%
Idle Average *
27
20.9
23%
22
19%
14.6
46%
18
33%
25 (6.8 - 119, n=677)
7%
Idle Maximum *
33
27
18%
32
3%
16.3
51%
23
30%
30.2 (8.3 - 122, n=677)
8%
Load Average *
129
93.4
28%
89
31%
88.5
31%
88
32%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=668)
19%
Load Maximum *
216
215.3
-0%
173
20%
182.4
16%
167
23%
170 (21.9 - 590, n=667)
21%
Witcher 3 ultra *
176
168.2
4%
147
16%
155.4
12%
120
32%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
5h 53min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
3h 40min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 02min
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H, 76 Wh
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, 50 Wh
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, 82 Wh
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, 80 Wh
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, 94.24 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-18%
4%
70%
104%
13%
Reader / Idle
353
335
-5%
682
93%
549
56%
341 (39 - 1174, n=647)
-3%
WiFi v1.3
220
181
-18%
190
-14%
387
76%
382
74%
254 (78 - 622, n=337)
15%
Load
62
81
31%
88
42%
174
181%
79 (18 - 202, n=613)
27%
H.264
364
251 (88 - 506, n=141)

Pros

+ 支持Nvidia Optimus和G-Sync
+ 紧凑时尚的设计
+ 色彩准确的屏幕
+ 144 Hz刷新率
+ 有用的原厂软件
+ 不错的性能表现
+ 重量对于一台15.6英寸游戏本来说很轻
+ RGB背光键盘

Cons

- 高负载下温度高
- 没有雷电3
- 没有读卡器
- 部分焊死内存
- 很一般的续航时间
- 功耗高
- 一般般的扬声器
华硕ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW笔记本电脑评测. Test device courtesy of ASUS Germany.
华硕ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW笔记本电脑评测. Test device courtesy of ASUS Germany.

从表面上看,华硕ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW目前是您可以购买的最好的游戏笔记本电脑之一。尽管它有一些可能会让人失望的弱点。

该设备采用轻薄的设计,但仍然塞入了功能强大的组件。它的高端CPU和GPU使其能够毫不费力地在高特效下运行近期的所有3A游戏。它的低响应时间,G-Sync,144 Hz刷新率使游戏看起来也很流畅。但是,你必须忍受低对比度的视觉效果和可怕的续航时间。我们仍然建议您在不玩游戏时激活Nvidia Optimus,因为如果始终启用GPU,电池将很快耗尽。

华硕ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW有很多功能。它时尚,紧凑,提供出色的游戏体验。然而,它运行起来很吵,缺少一些有用的接口,续航时间也很一般。

我们无法理解华硕所做出的一些决定。将一半的RAM焊接到主板似乎很傻,还没有配备读卡器,摄像头或雷电3端口。而且,GX502GW作为一台优质的轻薄游戏笔记本电脑,运行时声音太大而且太热。

简而言之,几乎没有理由考虑GX502系列,而是去选择Aero 15-X9或Razer Blade 15。可能你是为了那块非Max-Q GPU,但拥有满血RTX 20系列笔记本电脑也有其他牺牲。如果你正在寻找一台15.6英寸的游戏笔记本电脑,GX502GW仍然是一个不错的选择,但还是比不上技嘉和Razer的竞品。

Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW - 05/15/2019 v6
Florian Glaser

Chassis
83 / 98 → 85%
Keyboard
79%
Pointing Device
75%
Connectivity
60 / 81 → 74%
Weight
63 / 10-66 → 94%
Battery
73%
Display
90%
Games Performance
98%
Application Performance
100%
Temperature
80 / 95 → 84%
Noise
61 / 90 → 68%
Audio
76%
Average
78%
86%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

ASUS ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW
ASUS ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW
ASUS ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW
ASUS ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW
ASUS ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW
ASUS ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW
ASUS ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW
ASUS ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW
ASUS ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW
ASUS ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW
ASUS ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW
ASUS ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW
ASUS ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW
ASUS ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW
ASUS ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华硕ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW (Core i7-9750H, RTX 2070) 笔记本电脑评测
Florian Glaser, 2019-07-14 (Update: 2019-07-14)