华硕ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW (Core i7-9750H, RTX 2070) 笔记本电脑评测
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW (ROG Zephyrus S GX502 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-9750H 6 x 2.6 - 4.5 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1215 MHz, RAM: 7000 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 419.71, Optimus
Memory
32 GB
, DDR4-2666, 19-19-19-43, 双通道
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, Full HD, 144 Hz, G-Sync, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel HM370
Storage
2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0), 1024 GB
, 2 x M.2 2280 drive bays
Weight
2.064 kg, Power Supply: 632 g
Price
17999 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 286 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 275.3 cd/m² Minimum: 15 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 286 cd/m²
Contrast: 773:1 (Black: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.19 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.78}
calibrated: 2.27
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
91% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
91% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
64.9% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.41
CCT: 6405 K
| Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX AU Optronics B156HAN08.2, IPS, 1920x1080 | Acer Predator Triton 500 AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080 | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | 0% | 2% | -1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 64.9 | 65.6 1% | 64.2 -1% | 65.3 1% | 63.5 -2% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 91 | 92.2 1% | 92.6 2% | 94.9 4% | 93.1 2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 65.9 | 66.9 2% | 65.7 0% | 66.3 1% | 64.5 -2% |
| Response Times | -3% | -19% | -83% | -92% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 7.2 ? | 7 ? 3% | 8 ? -11% | 16.8 ? -133% | 16.4 ? -128% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 8.8 ? | 9.6 ? -9% | 11.2 ? -27% | 11.6 ? -32% | 13.6 ? -55% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | |||||
| Screen | -3% | -24% | -2% | 12% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 286 | 323.6 13% | 304 6% | 314.7 10% | 250 -13% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 275 | 315 15% | 299 9% | 312 13% | 235 -15% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 90 | 91 1% | 89 -1% | 90 0% | 85 -6% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.37 | 0.29 22% | 0.27 27% | 0.38 -3% | 0.29 22% |
| Contrast (:1) | 773 | 1116 44% | 1126 46% | 828 7% | 862 12% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.19 | 3.31 -51% | 4.66 -113% | 2.56 -17% | 1.46 33% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.4 | 5.74 -30% | 9.65 -119% | 4.89 -11% | 2.47 44% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.27 | 2.73 -20% | 1.72 24% | 1.71 25% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 2.9 -32% | 5.53 -151% | 3.4 -55% | 1.27 42% |
| Gamma | 2.41 91% | 2.29 96% | 2.5 88% | 2.3 96% | 2.4 92% |
| CCT | 6405 101% | 6765 96% | 8028 81% | 6435 101% | 6749 96% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) (%) | 59 | 59.7 1% | 60 2% | 60.7 3% | 60 2% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) (%) | 91 | 91.8 1% | 93 2% | 94.6 4% | 93 2% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -2% /
-2% | -14% /
-19% | -28% /
-11% | -27% /
-4% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.2 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 7.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8142 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1040 (1017.76-1182)
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1072 (986.63-1110.9)
Acer Predator Triton 500 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø980 (961.82-1019.05)
| Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0) | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Acer Predator Triton 500 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0) | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -29% | 7% | -10% | -11% | |
| Write 4K (MB/s) | 97 | 93.9 -3% | 93.6 -4% | 93.9 -3% | 97.1 0% |
| Read 4K (MB/s) | 49.58 | 46.29 -7% | 38.82 -22% | 40.56 -18% | 53.7 8% |
| Write Seq (MB/s) | 1838 | 974 -47% | 2455 34% | 1468 -20% | 1526 -17% |
| Read Seq (MB/s) | 2421 | 1425 -41% | 2107 -13% | 1540 -36% | 2020 -17% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 (MB/s) | 326.9 | 259.4 -21% | 298.7 -9% | 293.5 -10% | 285.6 -13% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 (MB/s) | 372.9 | 296.5 -20% | 338.7 -9% | 346 -7% | 321.8 -14% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 (MB/s) | 1894 | 977 -48% | 2902 53% | 1941 2% | 1533 -19% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 (MB/s) | 2828 | 1666 -41% | 3536 25% | 3266 15% | 2351 -17% |
2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
2828 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
1894 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
372.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
326.9 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
2421 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
1838 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
49.58 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
97 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 18686 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 30754 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 16290 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 6890 points | |
Help | ||
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0): Ø70 (63-76)
Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0): Ø76.1 (70-81)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8: Ø51.3 (44-61)
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 240, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX | |
| Acer Predator Triton 500 | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 130 | 70.2 | ||
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 91.3 | 86 | 80.3 | 74.2 |
| Apex Legends (2019) | 128 | 126 | ||
| Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 91 | 83 | ||
| Metro Exodus (2019) | 91.1 | 82.6 | 66.3 | 54.6 |
| Anthem (2019) | 84 | 79 | ||
| Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) | 121 | 75 | ||
| The Division 2 (2019) | 121 | 111 | 94 | 73 |
| Anno 1800 (2019) | 76.8 | 39.5 | ||
| Rage 2 (2019) | 180 | 122 | 103 | 101 |
| Control (2019) | 152 | 90 | 68 | |
| Borderlands 3 (2019) | 94 | 84 | 71 | 61 |
Noise level
| Idle |
| 31 / 33 / 38 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 50 / 56 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
| Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 4% | 9% | 17% | 7% | 15% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 30 | 28.7 4% | 29 3% | 28.8 4% | 30 -0% | 24.1 ? 20% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 31 | 29.8 4% | 30 3% | 28.8 7% | 32 -3% | 26.1 ? 16% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 33 | 32.4 2% | 32 3% | 28.8 13% | 34 -3% | 27.6 ? 16% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 38 | 38 -0% | 34 11% | 29.4 23% | 36 5% | 30.1 ? 21% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 50 | 38.2 24% | 44 12% | 35.7 29% | 42 16% | 43 ? 14% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (dB) | 53 | 56.6 -7% | 46 13% | 42.5 20% | 44 17% | |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 56 | 56.6 -1% | 47 16% | 45 20% | 48 14% | 53.7 ? 4% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.9 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-9.1 °C / -16.4 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-9.1 °C / -16.4 F).
| Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 6% | -3% | 12% | -1% | 4% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 54 | 47 13% | 49 9% | 49 9% | 56 -4% | 45.6 ? 16% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 47 | 48.6 -3% | 58 -23% | 49 -4% | 66 -40% | 48.3 ? -3% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 33 | 28.8 13% | 33 -0% | 25.4 23% | 27 18% | 31.4 ? 5% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 34 | 33.2 2% | 33 3% | 27.2 20% | 27 21% | 34.4 ? -1% |
* ... smaller is better
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.5 / 1.2 Watt |
| Idle | 24 / 27 / 33 Watt |
| Load |
129 / 216 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 18% | 20% | 36% | 31% | 17% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 24 | 16.1 33% | 16 33% | 10.4 57% | 16 33% | 13.7 ? 43% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 27 | 20.9 23% | 22 19% | 14.6 46% | 18 33% | 19.6 ? 27% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 33 | 27 18% | 32 3% | 16.3 51% | 23 30% | 26.2 ? 21% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 129 | 93.4 28% | 89 31% | 88.5 31% | 88 32% | 111.5 ? 14% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (Watt) | 176 | 168.2 4% | 147 16% | 155.4 12% | 120 32% | |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 216 | 215.3 -0% | 173 20% | 182.4 16% | 167 23% | 263 ? -22% |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 76 Wh | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 50 Wh | Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 82 Wh | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 80 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 94.24 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -19% | 7% | 73% | 106% | 65% | |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 5.9 | 5.6 -5% | 11.4 93% | 9.2 56% | 9.99 ? 69% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 3.7 | 3 -19% | 3.2 -14% | 6.5 76% | 6.4 73% | 6.7 ? 81% |
| Load (h) | 1 | 1.4 40% | 1.5 50% | 2.9 190% | 1.439 ? 44% | |
| H.264 (h) | 6.1 | 8.03 ? |
Pros
+ 支持Nvidia Optimus和G-Sync
+ 紧凑时尚的设计
+ 色彩准确的屏幕
+ 144 Hz刷新率
+ 有用的原厂软件
+ 不错的性能表现
+ 重量对于一台15.6英寸游戏本来说很轻
+ RGB背光键盘
Cons
- 高负载下温度高
- 没有雷电3
- 没有读卡器
- 部分焊死内存
- 很一般的续航时间
- 功耗高
- 一般般的扬声器
从表面上看，华硕ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW目前是您可以购买的最好的游戏笔记本电脑之一。尽管它有一些可能会让人失望的弱点。
该设备采用轻薄的设计，但仍然塞入了功能强大的组件。它的高端CPU和GPU使其能够毫不费力地在高特效下运行近期的所有3A游戏。它的低响应时间，G-Sync，144 Hz刷新率使游戏看起来也很流畅。但是，你必须忍受低对比度的视觉效果和可怕的续航时间。我们仍然建议您在不玩游戏时激活Nvidia Optimus，因为如果始终启用GPU，电池将很快耗尽。
华硕ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW有很多功能。它时尚，紧凑，提供出色的游戏体验。然而，它运行起来很吵，缺少一些有用的接口，续航时间也很一般。
我们无法理解华硕所做出的一些决定。将一半的RAM焊接到主板似乎很傻，还没有配备读卡器，摄像头或雷电3端口。而且，GX502GW作为一台优质的轻薄游戏笔记本电脑，运行时声音太大而且太热。
简而言之，几乎没有理由考虑GX502系列，而是去选择Aero 15-X9或Razer Blade 15。可能你是为了那块非Max-Q GPU，但拥有满血RTX 20系列笔记本电脑也有其他牺牲。如果你正在寻找一台15.6英寸的游戏笔记本电脑，GX502GW仍然是一个不错的选择，但还是比不上技嘉和Razer的竞品。
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
- 05/14/2020 v7 (old)
Florian Glaser
Gaming - Weighted Average
Price comparison
