戴尔 G16 (2024) 笔记本电脑评测:来自同一制造商的经济实惠的 Alienware 替代品?
2022 年底,我们最后一次(巧合的是,也是第一次)对戴尔相对较新的 G 系列 16 英寸机型进行了评测,该系列是戴尔的经济型中端游戏笔记本电脑。当时,这款 戴尔 G16配备了英特尔 Gen-12 CPU 和 RTX 3060.在 2024 机型上,制造商将英特尔 Gen 13 处理器和 RTX 4060(还有更多 GPU 可供选择)。显示屏也增加了功能更强大的型号。
我们还将关注戴尔是否进一步减薄了笔记本电脑相对较厚的外壳。此外,G16 当然还要与其他经济型和中端游戏机竞争,如 微星 Raider GE68 HX 13VF、联想 联想Legion Slim 5 16APH8和 联想LOQ 16-plus,我们自然会将其与前代产品以及价格稍高的 Alienware m16 R1.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
85.5 % | 02/2024 | Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 25.65 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
86.1 % | 10/2022 | Dell G16 7620 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.6 kg | 26.9 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
86.9 % | 10/2023 | MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 27.9 mm | 16.00" | 1900x1200 | |
87.7 % | 08/2023 | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 25.2 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
88.3 % | 09/2023 | Alienware m16 R1 Intel i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 3 kg | 25.4 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
87.3 % | 09/2023 | Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 25.9 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 铝质盖子,其余部分为灰色塑料
这款笔记本电脑的外壳与前代产品不同,主要由灰色塑料制成,只有盖子使用了铝材,因此具有良好的稳定性。底座也很稳定,几乎无法扭动。长铰链能很好地固定显示屏,但我们注意到在打开和关闭时会有轻微的摩擦声和吱吱声。希望这不会影响设备的使用寿命。它的做工还不错,但感觉不如戴尔和 Alienware 的高价机型质量好。
戴尔的徽标突出在笔记本电脑的顶部,除此之外,它没有任何其他颜色的点缀。尽管如此,这款显而易见的游戏本看起来也不是非常时尚,这主要是由于散热装置向后方突出。总的来说,G16 看起来并不优雅,而是比较笨重。
更昂贵的 Alienware m16 R1实际上比我们的 G16 稍宽一些,厚度也差不多。微星 微星 Raider GE68HX还要厚一些,而它们的其他尺寸几乎完全相同。即使是 联想Legion Slim 5虽然 G16 看起来相当厚实,但前者的尺寸略小。
与前代产品相比,该机型实际上略微纤薄了一些,但同时深度有所增加。它还更重(+ 200 克),这意味着 G16 现在是搭载 RTX 4060 的 16 英寸游戏机中第二重的机型,仅次于同一制造商生产的 Alienware。此外,戴尔甚至还为配备RTX 4060 的版本配备了巨大而沉重的 330 瓦电源,仅此一项重量就超过了 1.5 千克。
连接性 - 并非所有 G16 型号都配备 Thunderbolt 技术
笔记本电脑的端口布局保持不变,但有一个例外:在机身背面,连接端口被稍微调整了一下。虽然 HDMI 端口在前代机型上有很大的空间,但现在它正好位于 USB-A 端口和 USB-C 端口之间--如果使用较大的插头,前者可能会导致一些空间问题。戴尔的这一决定值得商榷。
注意:电源插头的位置不是很牢固,当移动笔记本电脑时,它很容易滑出。沉重的电源进一步加剧了这一问题。
同样值得怀疑的是该设备对 Thunderbolt (4) 的支持,这是其上一代产品的功能。现在,它显然取决于所安装的显卡。根据戴尔的说法,使用 RTX 4060 或更高显卡的机型不支持 Thunderbolt,而使用 RTX 4070 或更高显卡的机型则支持。这很不寻常,对于购买较小配置的用户来说,这很令人沮丧。该端口不支持 PowerDelivery。
交流
英特尔 AX201 WiFi 模块支持 WiFi 6,但还不支持 WiFi 6E。
它在 5 GHz 频段内的传输速率非常出色,而 210 Mb/s 的 2.4 GHz 速率则令人失望。
网络摄像头
从戴尔最新推出的 720p 网络摄像头可以看出,戴尔在节省成本方面做得还不够。现在,许多竞争对手都配备了全高清摄像头或更好的摄像头。在色彩偏差和图像清晰度方面,戴尔也有更好的机型。
安全
G16 并不具备任何物理安全功能,因为它既没有指纹传感器,也没有 Kensington 锁。当然,TPM 集成在处理器中。
配件和保修
包装中不包括任何额外物品。戴尔为这款设备提供为期 12 个月的标准保修,包括现场基本服务和硬件支持,特殊条件可参见下面的截图。
维护
10 个十字头螺钉将底板固定到位。其中四颗螺丝比其他螺丝长,但它们不会从孔中脱落,因此不用担心它们会混在一起。如果卸下螺丝,机箱底部几乎可以自行分离,因此不需要任何其他工具。
在机箱内部,没有像大多数同类产品那样明显的铜制热导管。您可以看到风扇、两个内存插槽、WiFi 模块、电池和两个 M.2-SSD 插槽,其中只有规格较小的 2230 插槽被占用。
输入设备 - 5 个可配置的特殊按键
键盘
G16 没有数字键盘,但这意味着所有按键都有足够的空间,包括正常大小的方向键。右侧有几个特殊按键(音量、麦克风静音键)。普通按键的大小约为 1.6 x 1.6 厘米,F 键的高度是普通按键的一半。WASD 键的轮廓为白色。
由于一些特殊按键位于右侧,F2 至 F6 可以通过宏等方式手动配置。
按键的升程不是很高,但反馈很好,可以舒适快速地打字。由此产生的噪音也非常适中。在我们的测试设备上,左箭头键的声音与其他(方向)键有些不同--略微空洞,好像内部有什么东西在共振。这可能是生产过程中出现的错误,但愿只影响到我们的设备。
键盘具有两个强度级别的背景照明。它只有一个区域,但您可以通过命令中心选择一系列 RGB 效果(雨滴、脉动等)。
触摸板
触摸板有点小(约 10.5 x 6.5 厘米),但戴尔可能认为大多数游戏玩家都会使用鼠标。触摸板的表面非常光滑,但在非常缓慢的移动过程中或手指潮湿时,可能会有些粘连。
集成的按键触发可靠,咔哒声比按键声稍大,但并不令人讨厌。
显示器 - DCI-P3 还是 sRGB?
尽管分辨率相同,但戴尔将京东方改成了奇美。雾面 IPS 显示屏的分辨率为 2,560 x 1,600 像素。但要注意:虽然网站目前只为 G16 提供了一种显示屏(即 QHD+ 显示屏(2560 x 1600),刷新率为 240 Hz,3 毫秒,NVIDIA G-SYNC,100% DCI-P3 覆盖率),但我们的测试样品配备的是具有相同分辨率的面板,但刷新率 "只有 "165 Hz,更重要的是,只有 sRGB 覆盖率,没有 DCI-P3!您必须查看该设备的手册才能发现这两种变体。
我们测得的平均亮度为 344 尼特,照度为 89%。不过,在描绘黑暗场景时,我们注意到几乎每个边缘都有一些细微的背光渗出。
尽管亮度相同,但屏幕显示的黑色值有所提高,这也有利于其对比度。总之,这是一款相当不错的 sRGB 显示屏,其响应时间也足够快。
|
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 369 cd/m²
Contrast: 1419:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.04 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 2.35
ΔE Greyscale 3.38 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
69.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.47
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 Chi Mei CMN161D (160GME), IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Dell G16 7620 BOE NE16QDM, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF Chi Mei N160JME-GTK, IPS, 1900x1200, 16.00 | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 BOE NJ NE160QDM-NYC, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Alienware m16 R1 Intel BOE NE16NYB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 AUOC1A5 (B160QAN03.L), IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 1% | -38% | 2% | 0% | 3% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 67.5 | 68.3 1% | 41.6 -38% | 69.3 3% | 67.7 0% | 70.5 4% |
sRGB Coverage | 98.5 | 98 -1% | 62.2 -37% | 100 2% | 97.2 -1% | 98.9 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 69.3 | 70.5 2% | 43 -38% | 70 1% | 70 1% | 72.6 5% |
Response Times | -7% | -131% | -8% | 39% | 17% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 7.6 ? | 8.6 ? -13% | 17.3 ? -128% | 10.7 ? -41% | 4 ? 47% | 7.2 ? 5% |
Response Time Black / White * | 10.4 ? | 10.4 ? -0% | 24.2 ? -133% | 7.8 ? 25% | 7.3 ? 30% | 7.4 ? 29% |
PWM Frequency | ||||||
Screen | 7% | -37% | 15% | 4% | 13% | |
Brightness middle | 369 | 369.4 0% | 300.9 -18% | 371.6 1% | 306 -17% | 407 10% |
Brightness | 344 | 348 1% | 302 -12% | 343 0% | 302 -12% | 369 7% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 83 -7% | 93 4% | 84 -6% | 89 0% | 85 -4% |
Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.32 -23% | 0.31 -19% | 0.44 -69% | 0.3 -15% | 0.45 -73% |
Contrast | 1419 | 1154 -19% | 971 -32% | 845 -40% | 1020 -28% | 904 -36% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.04 | 1.78 41% | 4.6 -51% | 1.52 50% | 2.57 15% | 1.43 53% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.56 | 4.41 21% | 17.6 -217% | 2.68 52% | 4.26 23% | 3.58 36% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.35 | 1.22 48% | 2.04 13% | 0.33 86% | 0.85 64% | 1.07 54% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.38 | 3.2 5% | 3.3 2% | 1.2 64% | 3.3 2% | 1.13 67% |
Gamma | 2.47 89% | 2.2 100% | 2.09 105% | 2.1 105% | 1.997 110% | 2.5 88% |
CCT | 6040 108% | 6750 96% | 7151 91% | 6503 100% | 6895 94% | 6526 100% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 0% /
4% | -69% /
-50% | 3% /
9% | 14% /
8% | 11% /
11% |
* ... smaller is better
我们测得 DisplayP3 和 AdobeRGB 的覆盖率约为 70%,而 sRGB 则几乎完全覆盖。旧显示器也达到了类似的数值;网站上提供的版本据说覆盖了 100 % 的 DCI-P3。
开箱即用的显示器没有经过最佳校准。我们使用 X-Rite 测量设备和 Calman 软件进行了校准,灰度偏差得到了彻底改善,但色彩却没有得到很好的改善。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.8 ms rise | |
↘ 4.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
7.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.8 ms rise | |
↘ 3.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
显示屏的亮度足以在室外使用--至少在有遮挡的环境中--此外,其磨砂表面还能消除大部分大面积反光。
性能 - G16 一如预期
戴尔 G16 是一款典型的经济型中端游戏笔记本电脑。它的 CPU 是英特尔酷睿 i7-13650HX并配备了 RTX 4060140 瓦、16 GB 内存和 1 TB NVMe 固态硬盘。因此,目前的大多数游戏都可以全高清播放。16:10 的显示屏效果相当不错,与笔记本电脑的硬件配置相得益彰。
测试条件
戴尔至少在 G16 上预装了两个应用程序(参见 McAffee)。一个是 "我的戴尔",它也预装在非游戏机上,另一个是 Alienware 机型上的 Alienware Command Center。我的戴尔 "包括服务、更新等功能,而 "命令中心 "则可以设置不同的性能模式(电池、安静、平衡、性能、手动)、按键照明和其他选项。
尽管已开发多年,但命令中心仍未完全开发完成。例如,窗口无法正常最大化;你仍然可以在底部看到桌面。
另一个错误可能是,一旦切换到性能模式,我们就会收到警告。这让人非常不安,因为这表明如果硬件的运行超出了推荐的规格,保修可能会失效。不过,我们怀疑该警告指的是手动模式,而不是戴尔自己指定的性能模式,这一点非常令人困惑!
然而,令人讨厌的是,McAffee 不仅是预装的,而且戴尔还定期向我们发送信息,要求我们使用这项服务(我们已经卸载了它),而且这条信息最迟每天都会再次出现。
处理器
戴尔笔记本电脑配备了 "猛禽湖 "CPU,即英特尔酷睿 i7-13650HX配备 14 个内核(6 个 P 内核、8 个 E 内核)和 20 个线程。P 核心的单个时钟频率最高可达 4.9 GHz,效率核心的基本时钟频率为 1.9 GHz。只有更强大的 i9-13900HX与 RTX 4070才能获得更强大的 i9-13900HX,而 RTX 4070 的价格要高出不少。
在 Cinebench-R15 循环测试中,G16 始终保持着较高的性能水平,在最初几次运行后没有出现任何性能下降。
在所有 CPU 基准测试中,i7-13650HX 的性能都达到了预期水平,比 i7-12700HX 快 15% 到 19%。 i7-12700H快 15 到 19%。
在性能、平衡和静音模式下,笔记本电脑在开始运行 Cinebench 时的功耗值为 159 瓦,在所有模式下单次测量的得分相同。在接下来的运行过程中,只有性能模式下的 TDP 值保持不变。在所有其他模式下,TDP 从第二次运行开始下降到约 50 瓦。
如果断开笔记本电脑电源,系统会自动切换到电池模式。在 Cinebench R15 Multi 中,它的输出 TDP 仅为 86 瓦,而在第一次运行后,TDP 降至仅 24 瓦。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 -2! | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
Dell G16 7620 -2! |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (18879 - 21006, n=4) | |
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34613, n=234, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (1813 - 1903, n=4) | |
Average of class Gaming (527 - 2235, n=232, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Dell G16 7620 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (7197 - 8021, n=4) | |
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=232, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (700 - 728, n=4) | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
Average of class Gaming (169 - 855, n=232, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Dell G16 7620 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=237, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (2864 - 3147, n=4) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 318, n=236, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (256 - 275, n=4) | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
Dell G16 7620 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
Average of class Gaming (87 - 1259, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (158 - 226, n=4) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=231, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (73927 - 80057, n=4) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=231, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (5828 - 6125, n=4) | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
Dell G16 7620 |
Geekbench 6.2 / Multi-Core | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
Average of class Gaming (5340 - 18590, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (13554 - 13711, n=2) | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 |
Geekbench 6.2 / Single-Core | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Average of class Gaming (1599 - 3095, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (2505 - 2562, n=2) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=235, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (12509 - 14367, n=4) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (1810 - 1866, n=4) | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2210, n=235, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16 7620 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (18.9 - 23.6, n=4) | |
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=234, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (38.9 - 58.8, n=4) | |
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 4.47, n=231, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (0.4217 - 0.4407, n=5) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Average of class Gaming (3069 - 60169, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (13404 - 20012, n=4) | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
Average of class Gaming (18567 - 252486, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (68241 - 97317, n=4) | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
Average of class Gaming (629 - 10389, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (3127 - 4487, n=4) | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 200651, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (108627 - 110589, n=4) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 32988, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (9134 - 10802, n=4) | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
Average of class Gaming (10291 - 134044, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (33391 - 48323, n=4) | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (64436 - 85343, n=4) | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (1136 - 1262, n=4) | |
Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2409, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Average of class Gaming (1518 - 31796, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (7270 - 10900, n=4) | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (36170 - 41319, n=4) | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=228, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 |
系统性能
在 PCMark 10 中,G16 的总体表现不错,但在 Essentials 子测试中确实表现出了一些弱点。CrossMark 的生产力测试也是如此。在所有测试中,我们的测试机型都略高于数据库中所有采用相同 CPU/GPU 配置的笔记本电脑,因此这些异常值并不太明显。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Average of class Gaming (5235 - 9852, n=200, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (6984 - 7613, n=3) | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
Average of class Gaming (8300 - 12334, n=199, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (9532 - 11151, n=3) | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (9961 - 10204, n=3) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 11833, n=199, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Average of class Gaming (6462 - 18475, n=199, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (8323 - 11686, n=3) | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2334, n=170, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1839 - 1951, n=3) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Dell G16 7620 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=170, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1730 - 1864, n=3) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Dell G16 7620 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (2020 - 2063, n=3) | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2514, n=170, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Dell G16 7620 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1544 - 1907, n=3) | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=170, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
Average of class Gaming (215 - 480, n=196, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (268 - 302, n=3) | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (260 - 276, n=2) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Average of class Gaming (157.9 - 328, n=163, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16 7620 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Average of class Gaming (421 - 824, n=211, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (507 - 511, n=3) | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7449 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (59266 - 64308, n=4) | |
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 92565, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (67305 - 68612, n=4) | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Average of class Gaming (24879 - 90647, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Average of class Gaming (21619 - 103259, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (58028 - 60298, n=4) | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (83.7 - 90.8, n=4) | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 152.5, n=224, last 2 years) | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在打开我们的网站时,笔记本电脑显示出一些轻微的延迟,但软件 LatencyMon 并没有将这些延迟标记为严重延迟。在打开多个标签页时,情况也没有改变。在播放 4K/60 帧的 YouTube 视频时,它的延迟略有上升,导致我们的测量工具显示出一些问题。不过,相比之下,这些延迟都很低,而且在播放测试视频时没有出现任何掉帧现象。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Dell G16 7620 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
戴尔安装了西部数据的 SN740,采用小型 M.2 2230 外形。第二个更大的 M.2-2280 插槽也是空闲的。PCIe-4-NVMe 在我们的 固态硬盘最佳列表中的第 142 位。它的输出性能实际上比微星 Raider 或联想 LOQ 16 的固态硬盘还要好。不过,与这些产品和其他竞争对手相比,G16 的存储介质在使用很短时间后就会出现热节流。
其传输速率随之下降了一半以上。无独有偶,G16 的前身也安装了一个速度更快的型号,尽管它也受到节流问题的影响。不过,这些问题出现的时间要晚得多。
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
3DMark 11 Performance | 31722 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 62309 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 24764 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 11135 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
当我们通过控制面板开启 Nvidia GPU 专用模式进行游戏基准测试时,我们注意到某些设置(如:Full HD Ultra、Strange Brigade QHD)会导致帧率明显低于 Optimus 或自动模式。 Witcher 3Full HD Ultra、Strange BrigadeQHD)导致帧速率明显低于 Optimus 或自动模式。这很不寻常,可能会导致一些挫败感。
除此之外,我们无法抱怨这款笔记本的游戏性能。相比之下,我们的 G16 比 微星 Raider的 i9-13950HX和 RTX 4060但 Alienware和 联想 LOQ紧随其后。
最终,目前所有的游戏都可以在 FHD 超高清设置下以超过 60fps 的速度运行。使用原生 1600p 分辨率时,通常无法达到 60fps 以上,但游戏仍能以 40 fps 以上的速度流畅运行。
Performance Rating - Percent | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF -1! | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel -1! | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=228, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Dell G16 7620 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Average of class Gaming (6.38 - 167.7, n=220, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Average of class Gaming (9.13 - 194.9, n=230, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Dell G16 7620 |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Average of class Gaming (14.6 - 421, n=228, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Dell G16 7620 |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Average of class Gaming (26.9 - 220, n=240, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 |
在 Witcher 3 Ultra 中,我们的 G16 发挥了最佳性能,帧率从略微(Alienware)到大幅(Legion Slim 5,GPU 自动)超越了竞争对手。
下表列出了Witcher 3 (FHD Ultra) fps 值,以及三种性能模式下的噪音排放和消耗测量值。
性能模式/值 | fps 开始 | fps 平均 | 噪音排放 | 消耗量 |
---|---|---|---|---|
性能 | 108 | 105.6 | 47.89 dB | 185 瓦 |
平衡 | 100 | 97.6 | 39 - 43 分贝 | 178 瓦 |
安静型 | 99 | 97.6 | 35.52 分贝 | 168 瓦 |
Witcher 3 FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
GTA V (2015) | 185.8 | 183.2 | 176.2 | 117.4 | 50.8 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 340.4 | 193.1 | 110 | 108 | 42.4 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 177 | 168.7 | 160.8 | 149 | 126.2 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 219 | 150.1 | 103.7 | 75.9 | ||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 160.4 | 144.6 | 114.9 | 119.6 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 176 | 148 | 141 | 135 | 105 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 478 | 291 | 228 | 194.9 | 129 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 131.1 | 75.6 | 69.8 | 45.6 |
排放 - 即使在游戏时也相当安静
噪音排放
在空闲模式下,除性能模式外,使用其他模式时风扇均处于关闭状态。在 3DMark06(我们的平均负载场景)中,笔记本电脑的噪音排放与空闲模式(性能模式,约 28 分贝)相同,因此风扇不会转得更快。
即使是在游戏和满载状态下,戴尔 G16 的噪音也远低于 50 分贝,明显低于同类产品,这似乎是其庞大的散热系统的优势所在。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23 / 23 / 27.96 dB(A) |
Load |
| 27.96 / 47.89 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23 dB(A) |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00 | Dell G16 7620 GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 512GB | MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N | Alienware m16 R1 Intel NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Kioxia KXG70ZNV512G | Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Solidigm SSDPFINW512GZL | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -10% | -26% | -6% | -19% | -16% | |
off / environment * | 23 | 23.2 -1% | 23.3 -1% | 22.9 -0% | 25 -9% | 23 -0% |
Idle Minimum * | 23 | 28.3 -23% | 25 -9% | 23.1 -0% | 25 -9% | 23 -0% |
Idle Average * | 23 | 28.8 -25% | 31.3 -36% | 23.1 -0% | 26 -13% | 23 -0% |
Idle Maximum * | 27.96 | 28.9 -3% | 37.5 -34% | 27.7 1% | 27 3% | 27.66 1% |
Load Average * | 27.96 | 32.4 -16% | 44 -57% | 33.3 -19% | 52 -86% | 53.62 -92% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 47.89 | 48.3 -1% | 57 -19% | 54 -13% | 51 -6% | 53.5 -12% |
Load Maximum * | 47.89 | 48.1 -0% | 60.1 -25% | 54 -13% | 53 -11% | 53.5 -12% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
不过,该设备相对较低的噪音排放也有一些小缺点。与竞争对手相比,G16 的表面容易发热。在最大负载下,我们测得底部的热点温度高达 58 °C!只有 联想 LOQ 16和 G16 的前代产品也有类似的发热现象,而其他对比设备的温度都略低于 50 °C。至少掌托始终是凉爽的,WASD 键周围的区域也保持在可接受的范围内。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 58 °C / 136 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25 °C / 77 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+3.9 °C / 7 F).
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Dell G16 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Alienware m16 R1 Intel Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 19% | 16% | 23% | -2% | 10% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 49 | 47.6 3% | 41.4 16% | 40.6 17% | 49 -0% | 48 2% |
Maximum Bottom * | 58 | 54 7% | 45.4 22% | 42 28% | 48 17% | 59 -2% |
Idle Upper Side * | 35 | 23 34% | 29.8 15% | 27.8 21% | 40 -14% | 28 20% |
Idle Bottom * | 35 | 24.6 30% | 31.4 10% | 26.6 24% | 39 -11% | 28 20% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在压力测试期间,内核的频率曾短暂达到 4.1 GHz。不幸的是,这导致 CPU 发热高达 100 °C,设备功耗从原来的 128 瓦下降到 70 瓦左右。CPU 时钟频率稳定在 2.9 GHz 左右,温度稳定在 85 °C 左右。
相比之下,GPU 的时钟频率在整个运行过程中一直稳定在 2.4 至 2.5 GHz 左右。内存时钟(2 GHz)也是如此。芯片温度稳定在 72 °C左右,平均功耗为 71 瓦。
CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | GPU 平均温度(°C) | |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 2.9 | 2,490 | 85 | 72 |
Witcher 3 压力 | 0.538 | 2,500 | 81 | 73 |
发言人
笔记本电脑的立体声扬声器不是最好的:几乎没有低音,声音往往太小,甚至中高音也不是很平衡或线性。模拟音频连接只有一个 3.5 毫米耳机接口。
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.55 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.1% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (18.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理 - 戴尔 G16 达到了同类产品的平均水平
耗电量
从性能上看,G16 的耗电量还算可以。总体而言,该设备甚至变得更加高效。现在,它的耗电量比上一代产品更低,尤其是在空闲时。在玩游戏时,它的耗电量只增加了约 5%,而性能却提高了约 14%。
在玩游戏时,同样速度的 Alienware 和微星 Raider 的功耗几乎一样高,即在玩 Witcher 3 时平均功耗为 185 瓦。其短期最大功耗为 255 瓦。
有鉴于此,戴尔为配备 RTX 4060 的 G16 配备了一个巨大、笨重的 330 瓦电源,这令人非常惊讶。对于所安装的硬件而言,这完全是超标的。据推测,戴尔只是在所有配置中都配备了相同的电源,这样就能同时满足 i9-13900HX 和 RTX 4070 的需求。对于购买该机型的用户来说,更小、更轻的电源装置会更方便。
Off / Standby | 0.06 / 2.2 Watt |
Idle | 11 / 14.8 / 16.8 Watt |
Load |
103.7 / 255 Watt |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Dell G16 7620 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN810 512GB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB, IPS, 1900x1200, 16.00 | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Alienware m16 R1 Intel i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Kioxia KXG70ZNV512G, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Solidigm SSDPFINW512GZL, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -21% | -32% | 9% | -9% | -12% | -8% | -24% | |
Idle Minimum * | 11 | 14.4 -31% | 15.8 -44% | 9.4 15% | 10 9% | 17.2 -56% | 13 ? -18% | 13.8 ? -25% |
Idle Average * | 14.8 | 17.8 -20% | 19.4 -31% | 15.5 -5% | 14 5% | 19.3 -30% | 17.1 ? -16% | 19.2 ? -30% |
Idle Maximum * | 16.8 | 31.5 -88% | 27.3 -63% | 24.4 -45% | 21 -25% | 21.2 -26% | 21.5 ? -28% | 27 ? -61% |
Load Average * | 103.7 | 101.2 2% | 114.7 -11% | 74.1 29% | 119 -15% | 90 13% | 96.4 ? 7% | 111.3 ? -7% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 185 | 176.9 4% | 185.5 -0% | 112.9 39% | 186.7 -1% | 168 9% | ||
Load Maximum * | 255 | 242.9 5% | 364.2 -43% | 206.5 19% | 323 -27% | 211 17% | 214 ? 16% | 251 ? 2% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
戴尔在笔记本电脑中安装了 86 瓦时的电池。竞争对手也配备了类似的电池。这足以让 G16 在上网或观看视频时达到约 5.5 小时(最大亮度)至近 6.5 小时(150 尼特)的运行时间。这使得戴尔游戏本的性能达到了同类产品的平均水平。
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 86 Wh | Dell G16 7620 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 84 Wh | MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | Alienware m16 R1 Intel i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 86 Wh | Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -32% | 24% | 2% | -18% | 5% | 4% | |
H.264 | 381 | 336 -12% | 385 1% | 400 ? 5% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 378 | 297 -21% | 406 7% | 425 12% | 286 -24% | 376 -1% | 368 ? -3% |
Load | 76 | 43 -43% | 107 41% | 70 -8% | 62 -18% | 88 16% | 84.7 ? 11% |
Reader / Idle | 426 | 527 | 699 | 383 | 546 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 经济实惠的 Alienware 替代品,存在一些小问题
与戴尔的 Alienware 系列相比,戴尔 G16 7630 显得更加时尚和实惠。它的性能仍然不错,一个非常积极的方面是,与许多竞争对手相比,玩家在玩游戏时仍然非常安静。
戴尔在网络摄像头和做工方面做了一些节省,特别是在预算紧张的情况下,这很可能是客户可以承受的,但有时还是会令人讨厌:例如,当设备移动时,笔记本电脑的电源接口会一点一点地滑落,笨重的电源供应器,或者只有配备 i9-13900HX 处理器的版本才会有这样的问题。 i9-13900HX和 RTX 4070支持 Thunderbolt。我们的测试样品配备了 i7-13650H和 RTX 4060的测试样机则不支持,而且后者对客户来说也缺乏透明度,因为两种不同的显示屏类型仅在手册中列出,而且只在色彩空间和刷新率上有所不同。
戴尔 G16 7630 是一款相当大而重的中端游戏笔记本电脑,具有良好的性能和安静的运行环境。在连接性和构造方面,戴尔可以做得更大度一些。
如果你喜欢更时尚、更高效的产品,那么不妨考虑一下性能稍弱的 戴尔 Inspiron 16 Plus 7630.另一个选择是 联想Legion Slim 5如果您的预算没有那么紧张,还可以选择 Legion Pro 5 16.
价格和供应情况
戴尔 G16 7630 目前在亚马逊上的报价为1401.84 美元。该版本配备了英特尔酷睿 i9-13900HX、RTX 4070、16 GB 内存和 1 TB 固态硬盘。
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
-
02/13/2024 v7
Christian Hintze
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.