华硕ROG Strix Scar 17 SE评测--配备RTX 3080 Ti的全功能游戏笔记本
ROG Strix Scar SE是华硕的游戏旗舰，在2022年也是如此，它再次配备了目前市场上最快的组件。我们测试了G733CX顶级型号，配备了英特尔酷睿i9-12950HX，NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080 Ti，两个来自三星的2TB SSD，以及一个快速的QHD面板，刷新率为240-Hz。价格也很高端，因为我们的测试设备的建议零售价为3,999欧元（约4,129美元）。
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W (ROG Strix Scar 17 G733 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i9-12950HX 16 x 1.7 - 5 GHz, 115 W PL2 / Short Burst, 70 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-HX
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, Core: 1590 MHz, RAM: 2000 MHz, 175 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), 526.86, Optimus, MUX
Memory
32 GB
, DDR5-4800, dual-channel, 2 slots, max. 64 GB
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 170 PPI, NE173QHM-NZ2, IPS, glossy: no, 240 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM670 (Alder Lake-S PCH)
Storage
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, 2048 GB
, 2x 2TB RAID-0, 3640 GB free
Weight
2.927 kg, Power Supply: 1.1 kg
Price
4000 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86.9 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2022 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.9 kg | 28.3 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1440 | |
| 88.9 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.6 kg | 20 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 88.3 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | MSI Titan GT77 12UHS i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 3.3 kg | 23 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 87.6 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 27 mm | 17.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 89.2 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | Alienware x17 R2 P48E i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 3.1 kg | 20.9 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 |
外壳--游戏笔记本的设计引人注目，并具有广泛的照明效果
ROG Strix Scar 17显然是一款完全不掩饰其野心的游戏笔记本电脑。这款机箱在很大程度上与去年的G733QS相同。 去年的G733QS而基本单元的一个部分又是透明的。此外，还有广泛的照明元素和一些额外的设计元素或噱头，如盖子上的特殊文字，只有当你用紫外线照射时才能看到。
塑料外壳的质量总体上是好的，尽管表面仍然容易留下指纹，例如在打开显示屏时，你可能会偶尔听到轻微的吱嘎声。厚厚的底座单元的稳定性还不错，但在键盘的中央区域，你仍然可以把底座单元压得很低。虽然相对较薄的显示屏盖子做得很好，但铰链仍然无法防止笔记本电脑移动后的一些轻微晃动，例如。
即使机箱的底盖可以被拆下，但你必须小心行事。由于照明装置集成在该部件中，你首先要断开两条小的扁平电缆，然后才能拆下盖子。由于可以接触到风扇、两个固态硬盘、两个内存模块和WLAN模块，所以维护选项很好。
设备 - ROG Strix Scar 17，配备HDMI 2.1和Wi-Fi 6E
除了Thunderbolt连接外，G733CX还提供了一个HDMI 2.1端口，背面的USB端口也可用于在路上充电（最大100瓦）。大部分连接都在后面，你只能在左侧找到两个普通的USB-A端口和3.5毫米音频端口。右侧还提供了一个华硕键鼠的插槽，允许你存储系统设置和数据。
采用英特尔AX211的无线局域网性能非常好，我们也能够毫无困难地连接到华硕参考路由器的6GHz网络。还有一个2.5Gbit/s的以太网连接用于有线连接。ROG Strix Scar 17的用户必须没有网络摄像头，但如果有必要，制造商提供了一个相应的外部网络摄像头（ROG Eye S）。
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1645 (1589-1741)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1732 (1685-1744)
输入设备 - 带有良好键盘的华硕
华硕再次改变了键盘布局，现在采用了更传统的布局，特殊键更小。还有一个 "常规 "的数字块再次出现，这也意味着方向键稍微向左移动，现在更小。并非所有用户都会喜欢这样。然而，键盘的质量非常好，有2毫米长的轮毂，而且你可以疯狂地使用照明，它允许你单独配置每个键，包括通过AuraSync技术的游戏特定模式。大的ClickPad提供了良好的滑动特性，并且工作可靠，但当你按下它时，它也相当响。
显示屏 - QHD，240赫兹
除了我们在去年的Scar 17 G733QS中测试的360赫兹全高清面板外，还有 去年的Scar 17 G733QS华硕还提供了一个刷新率为240赫兹的QHD面板，这就是我们测试单元中的面板。哑光IPS面板（2560 x 1440像素，16:9）的主观图像印象非常好，除了杜比视界HDR之外，还支持自适应同步。响应时间非常快，而且没有使用PWM。亮度平均约为300cd/m²，这也与360Hz的全高清面板的水平相同。另一方面，黑值有点高，也导致了1000:1左右的平庸的对比度。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
NE173QHM-NZ2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 320 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 302.8 cd/m² Minimum: 3.7 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 320 cd/m²
Contrast: 1067:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86
ΔE Greyscale 1.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
84.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.13
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W NE173QHM-NZ2, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE NE160QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Sharp SHP1544 LQ173M1JW08, IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 17.3" | SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 BOE0A99, IPS, 2560x1600, 17" | Alienware x17 R2 P48E AU Optronics B173HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AU Optronics B173HAN05.4, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -16% | -14% | -16% | -8% | -14% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 97.1 | 69.3 -29% | 70.8 -27% | 69 -29% | 79.2 -18% | 71 -27% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 98.2 -2% | 98.9 -1% | 99.8 0% | 99.8 0% | 99.4 -1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 84.8 | 70.8 -17% | 73 -14% | 69.6 -18% | 79.6 -6% | 72.2 -15% |
| Response Times | -38% | 48% | -25% | -55% | -12% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 5.7 ? | 12.6 ? -121% | 3.03 ? 47% | 10.8 ? -89% | 12.4 ? -118% | 6.6 ? -16% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 10.1 ? | 5.6 ? 45% | 5.28 ? 48% | 6.1 ? 40% | 9.2 ? 9% | 10.8 ? -7% |
| PWM Frequency | ||||||
| Screen | -41% | -63% | -9% | -89% | -25% | |
| Brightness middle | 320 | 547 71% | 280 -12% | 415 30% | 365.4 14% | 303.8 -5% |
| Brightness | 303 | 523 73% | 275 -9% | 399 32% | 344 14% | 292 -4% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 88 1% | 79 -9% | 90 3% | 85 -2% | 85 -2% |
| Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.44 -47% | 0.4 -33% | 0.43 -43% | 0.29 3% | 0.23 23% |
| Contrast | 1067 | 1243 16% | 700 -34% | 965 -10% | 1260 18% | 1321 24% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 2.1 -91% | 2.1 -91% | 1.44 -31% | 3.17 -188% | 1.87 -70% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.7 | 7 -159% | 5.83 -116% | 2.33 14% | 7.69 -185% | 3.26 -21% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 3.2 -191% | 3.3 -200% | 1.8 -64% | 5.3 -382% | 2.7 -145% |
| Gamma | 2.13 103% | 2.23 99% | 2.13 103% | 2.132 103% | 2.18 101% | 2.26 97% |
| CCT | 6599 98% | 6979 93% | 7060 92% | 6327 103% | 5879 111% | 6436 101% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.9 | 1.58 | 0.89 | 0.51 | 1.45 | |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 65.6 | |||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.4 | |||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -32% /
-35% | -10% /
-35% | -17% /
-13% | -51% /
-65% | -17% /
-20% |
* ... smaller is better
该显示器涵盖了P3色彩空间，我们用专业的CalMAN软件进行的分析表明，该屏幕在交付状态下已经非常准确。也没有色差，我们自己的校准也没有导致任何额外的改进，所以我们在这里不为你提供一个配置文件。这款QHD面板适用于图像和视频处理，没有任何限制。
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5.1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 5.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.4 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8467 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能 - 刹车后的英特尔HX
测试条件
ROG软件提供广泛的配置选项和电源配置文件。例如，你可以完全停用集成GPU（MUX）或手动设置CPU和GPU的功率值。对于我们下面的基准和测量，我们使用性能配置文件，因为这已经使全部GPU性能可用。虽然在Turbo模式下，CPU的性能甚至略高，但在我们看来，这并不能证明风扇噪音的显著提高。
处理器 - 酷睿i9-12950HX
芯片英特尔酷睿i9-12950HX是目前英特尔最快的移动处理器。尽管它能够消耗高达175瓦的功率，但在我们的测试装置中，它远远没有达到这个数值。相反，我们看到最大消耗为115瓦（即使是在涡轮模式下），在某些时候，该值达到了70瓦（涡轮模式下为105瓦）。虽然CPU的性能一点也不差，但你也可以用普通的酷睿i9获得这样的性能，而HX芯片的额外溢价并不值得额外花费。
在电池运行时，功耗被限制在35瓦，导致多核性能降低约40%。你可以在我们相应的技术部分找到更多的CPU基准测试 我们相应的技术部分.
Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX: Ø2740 (2605.18-3101.02)
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX: Ø3279 (3244.91-3512.16)
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX: Ø3311 (3259.45-3569.52)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø2230 (2203.37-2292.39)
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø2889 (2849.61-2917.79)
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX: Ø2216 (2202.89-2222.96)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Average of class Gaming (5668 - 39652, n=147, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (16277 - 23113, n=7) | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
| Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2252, n=147, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (1465 - 1922, n=7) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Average of class Gaming (2179 - 15517, n=147, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (6625 - 8777, n=7) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| Average of class Gaming (439 - 866, n=147, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (703 - 741, n=7) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Average of class Gaming (1537 - 6074, n=150, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (2464 - 3530, n=7) | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 343, n=147, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (167 - 276, n=7) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (138 - 193, n=7) | |
| Average of class Gaming (81 - 517, n=141, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| Average of class Gaming (23795 - 144064, n=145, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (65637 - 85019, n=7) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7573, n=145, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (6022 - 6318, n=7) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (14028 - 16009, n=7) | |
| Average of class Gaming (4557 - 25855, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| Average of class Gaming (986 - 2423, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (1847 - 1945, n=7) | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Average of class Gaming (7.7 - 42.9, n=145, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (18.6 - 26.5, n=7) | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 96.6, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (34.7 - 45.4, n=7) | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=146, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (0.4251 - 0.4515, n=7) | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Gaming (7192 - 81639, n=145, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (15499 - 22868, n=7) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Average of class Gaming (35040 - 252486, n=145, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (77846 - 115907, n=7) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1728 - 10389, n=145, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (3426 - 5069, n=7) | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=145, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (102752 - 104726, n=7) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Average of class Gaming (5020 - 32988, n=145, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (10134 - 12823, n=7) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Average of class Gaming (17585 - 134044, n=145, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (37146 - 57340, n=7) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (72599 - 181128, n=7) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=145, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| Average of class Gaming (373 - 2531, n=145, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (996 - 1417, n=7) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Gaming (3856 - 43430, n=145, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (8455 - 12432, n=7) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (35479 - 42655, n=7) | |
| Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=145, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
系统性能
主观性能印象很好，这也被良好的基准测试结果所证实。在测试过程中，我们完全没有注意到任何问题。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=130, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12600, n=130, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=130, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| Average of class Gaming (6807 - 19351, n=130, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=110, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=110, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=110, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=110, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 7208 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Average of class Gaming (21750 - 97515, n=145, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (59731 - 64732, n=7) | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Average of class Gaming (22956 - 102937, n=145, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (59744 - 70359, n=7) | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Average of class Gaming (22297 - 108954, n=145, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (57750 - 67899, n=7) | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=145, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (84.5 - 92.2, n=7) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
在我们的标准化延迟测试中（上网，4K YouTube视频，CPU负载），我们的测试装置与其BIOS版本有一些问题，所以它不适合实时视频和音频处理。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储解决方案
华硕在这里使用了两个来自三星的快速2TB固态硬盘（PM91A）的RAID 0配置。这允许超过10GB/s的极高传输率。然而，在恒定的负载下，性能并不稳定，反而大量下降。但这在日常游戏中不应该造成任何限制。你可以找到更多的SSD基准测试 这里.
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
5370.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
10109.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
1005.85 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
767.97 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
80.63 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
229.37 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8:
1886.09 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8:
2061.23 MB/s
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W: Ø1479 (639.61-10176.63)
图形卡
华硕使用GeForce RTX 3080 Ti版本，其TGP为150瓦，而且GPU还能使用处理器的额外25瓦动态提升。它在性能模式下也能达到这个数值（175瓦），所以没有必要使用涡轮模式。还有一个MUX，允许你完全停用集成GPU（需要重新启动），这可以改善游戏时的延迟，但对图形性能本身没有太大影响。
图形性能属于顶级性能组，也高于我们数据库中RTX 3080 Ti的平均数值。此外，图形性能保持完全稳定。3DMarkTime Spy 压力测试顺利通过，在我们的TheWitcher 3 恒定负载测试中也没有性能下降。游戏性能很容易满足原生QHD分辨率下的最大细节，即使在要求很高的游戏中也是如此。
在电池操作中，允许GPU最大消耗44瓦，这相当于性能下降了约70%。你可以在这里找到额外的GPU基准测试移动显示芯片——基准测试成绩列表 。
3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark | V-Ray 5 Benchmark | V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10 | Geekbench 5.5
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 35997 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 28793 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 12904 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (20 - 28, n=13) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| Average of class Gaming (10 - 95, n=139, last 2 years) | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
| Average of class Gaming (15 - 156, n=141, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (32 - 41, n=13) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (261 - 429, n=13) | |
| Average of class Gaming (123 - 962, n=146, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
* ... smaller is better
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 214, n=109, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (30 - 130.6, n=43) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
| GTA V | |
| 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 168.2, n=124, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (30 - 139.2, n=42) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
| 2560x1440 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
| Average of class Gaming (36.9 - 164.3, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (30 - 121.2, n=28) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| F1 22 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (78.9 - 91, n=4) | |
| Average of class Gaming (13.2 - 137.1, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
| 2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| Average of class Gaming (31 - 91.8, n=42, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (52.9 - 62, n=2) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
The Witcher 3 FPS Chart
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø118.8 (111-126)
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 186.8 | 180.7 | 126.7 | 114.1 | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 118.8 | ||||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 211 | 191 | 180.8 | 169.8 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 173.3 | 156.2 | 118.5 | 92.8 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 165.3 | 143.5 | 116.2 | ||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 236 | 211 | 157.7 | ||
| F1 2021 (2021) | 236 | 211 | 132.8 | 106.2 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 103 | 101 | 98 | 87 | 56 |
| F1 22 (2022) | 235 | 235 | 199.7 | 78.9 | 52.9 |
| Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 (2022) | 135 | 109 | 107 | 78 |
排放和电源管理
噪声水平
华硕在这里使用了一个蒸气室冷却系统。在高性能电源模式下，该设备也保持相对安静，在压力测试和游戏时，我们能够测量到最大46分贝（A）。当然，这仍然是明显的，但我们的测试设备仍然比竞争对手明显更安静。在Turbo模式下，游戏性能只是微不足道的提高，但两个运行中的风扇产生了54 dB(A)的噪音。在空闲运行时，风扇经常保持关闭状态，但我们几乎总是注意到一些安静的电子噪音。在负载情况下，我们猜测也有一些可听的线圈啸叫声来自GPU。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 23.9 / 23.9 / 23.9 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 34.3 / 45.9 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.9 dB(A) | ||
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH | MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW | Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0) | Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -19% | -9% | -27% | 1% | -4% | |
| off / environment * | 23.9 | 24.5 -3% | 21.9 8% | 26 -9% | 22.7 5% | 25 -5% |
| Idle Minimum * | 23.9 | 24.5 -3% | 24.53 -3% | 26 -9% | 23.1 3% | 25.2 -5% |
| Idle Average * | 23.9 | 30 -26% | 24.53 -3% | 29 -21% | 23.1 3% | 25.2 -5% |
| Idle Maximum * | 23.9 | 32.5 -36% | 24.53 -3% | 40 -67% | 23.1 3% | 25.2 -5% |
| Load Average * | 34.3 | 43.9 -28% | 46.25 -35% | 47 -37% | 31.9 7% | 30.7 10% |
| Load Maximum * | 45.9 | 54.2 -18% | 54.25 -18% | 54 -18% | 52.5 -14% | 51.3 -12% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 48.8 | 56.86 | 52 | 52.5 | 51.3 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
尽管风扇相对安静，但表面温度没有理由让人担心。尽管我们在一些孤立的地方测量到了超过50°C（122°F）的负载，但键盘仍然非常凉爽，在游戏过程中也没有任何限制。
在压力测试中，GPU得到了优先处理，当处理器的功率达到36瓦时，它就稳定地运行在150瓦。在压力测试之后，性能并没有下降。
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.8 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52.4 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.6 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26 °C / 78.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+2.9 °C / 5.2 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.8 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52.4 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.6 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26 °C / 78.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+2.9 °C / 5.2 F).
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -8% | -3% | 1% | 7% | 4% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 48.8 | 44.4 9% | 40.8 16% | 49 -0% | 49.6 -2% | 40 18% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 52.4 | 60.8 -16% | 52.4 -0% | 52 1% | 42.4 19% | 39.8 24% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 30.4 | 33.8 -11% | 34.6 -14% | 30 1% | 29.2 4% | 34.6 -14% |
| Idle Bottom * | 34.1 | 38.8 -14% | 38.4 -13% | 33 3% | 32 6% | 38.4 -13% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
该音响系统由总共四个模块组成，能产生强大而宽敞的声音。尽管扬声器不是市场上最响亮的，但总体来说质量非常好。然而，由于游戏时的风扇噪音很大，我们仍然建议使用耳机。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 71.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 71.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 71.8% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (107.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 100% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
消耗功率
ROG Strix Scar 17 SE并不是一个非常高效的笔记本电脑，考虑到强大的硬件，这并不十分令人惊讶。我们已经测量到空闲运行时的功率高达27瓦，而在游戏时，该值增加到约230瓦。因此，330瓦的电源已经足够大了。待机消耗也相当高，为2.6瓦，但这是由于默认激活的照明效果。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.58 / 2.6 Watt |
| Idle | 19.3 / 26.5 / 27.1 Watt |
| Load |
141 / 307.9 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø225 (221-232)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø238 (220-308)
Power Consumption With External Monitor
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø127 (115.4-183.5)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø78.3 (73.5-109)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø148.3 (141.9-156.4)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø215 (206-220)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø214 (211-217)
电池寿命
在我们的WLAN运行时间测试中，在150cd/m²（相当于最大亮度的48%）下，我们的测试设备只持续了约4小时。考虑到高消耗值，这并不十分令人惊讶。一些竞争对手在这里持续的时间明显更长，如果你需要弥补离开插座的时间。游戏可以持续一小时左右，但性能会有明显下降。完全为90瓦时的电池充电需要大约100分钟，大约53分钟后，80%的容量已经可用。
Pros
+ 良好的QHD面板，240赫兹
+ 高水平和稳定的游戏性能
+ 广泛的机箱照明
+ TB4，Wi-Fi 6E，和PCIe 4.0
+ 游戏时风扇相对安静
Cons
- 不稳定的SSD性能
- HX CPU的附加费用并不值得购买
- 没有网络摄像头
- 电子噪音
结论 - 一个装备齐全的快速游戏笔记本电脑
目前，华硕ROG Strix Scar 17 SE提供了真正的一切游戏玩家的心愿。一个快速的QHD面板，240赫兹，加上GeForce RTX 3080 Ti，这也为原生分辨率的最大细节提供了足够的动力。虽然CPU性能对于游戏笔记本来说也很好，但HX处理器的潜力不能完全发挥。因此，你应该为自己省去购买更强大的处理器的额外溢价，直接选择普通的Core i9。
其他优点包括非常准确的色彩，如果你必须直接进行视频处理，例如，适度的表面温度，以及游戏期间相对安静的风扇。虽然有一个涡轮模式，它也会变得非常响亮，但这对游戏性能没有太大的影响，所以在我们看来，这并不值得。
新的华硕ROG Strix Scar 17 SE提供了大量的性能和游戏功能，但你应该节省英特尔HX处理器的额外溢价。
游戏市场上的竞争对手提供类似的性能规格，但也有更明亮的显示器部分和不那么华丽的外壳。此外，从长远来看，电子噪音会变得很烦人。
价格和可用性
我们的测试配置ROG Strix Scar 17 SE可从亚马逊，售价3899美元和一个较小的配置，与常规的酷睿i9-12900H也可在那里$2278.
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
- 11/18/2022 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Gaming - Weighted Average
Price comparison
