华硕ROG Strix Scar 17 SE评测--配备RTX 3080 Ti的全功能游戏笔记本

ROG Strix Scar SE是华硕的游戏旗舰,在2022年也是如此,它再次配备了目前市场上最快的组件。我们测试了G733CX顶级型号,配备了英特尔酷睿i9-12950HX,NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080 Ti,两个来自三星的2TB SSD,以及一个快速的QHD面板,刷新率为240-Hz。价格也很高端,因为我们的测试设备的建议零售价为3,999欧元(约4,129美元)。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
86.9 % | 11/2022 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.9 kg | 28.3 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1440 | |
88.9 % | 09/2022 | Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.6 kg | 20 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
88.3 % | 08/2022 | MSI Titan GT77 12UHS i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 3.3 kg | 23 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
87.6 % | 09/2022 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 27 mm | 17.00" | 2560x1600 | |
89.2 % | 05/2022 | Alienware x17 R2 P48E i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 3.1 kg | 20.9 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳--游戏笔记本的设计引人注目,并具有广泛的照明效果
ROG Strix Scar 17显然是一款完全不掩饰其野心的游戏笔记本电脑。这款机箱在很大程度上与去年的G733QS相同。 去年的G733QS而基本单元的一个部分又是透明的。此外,还有广泛的照明元素和一些额外的设计元素或噱头,如盖子上的特殊文字,只有当你用紫外线照射时才能看到。
塑料外壳的质量总体上是好的,尽管表面仍然容易留下指纹,例如在打开显示屏时,你可能会偶尔听到轻微的吱嘎声。厚厚的底座单元的稳定性还不错,但在键盘的中央区域,你仍然可以把底座单元压得很低。虽然相对较薄的显示屏盖子做得很好,但铰链仍然无法防止笔记本电脑移动后的一些轻微晃动,例如。
即使机箱的底盖可以被拆下,但你必须小心行事。由于照明装置集成在该部件中,你首先要断开两条小的扁平电缆,然后才能拆下盖子。由于可以接触到风扇、两个固态硬盘、两个内存模块和WLAN模块,所以维护选项很好。
设备 - ROG Strix Scar 17,配备HDMI 2.1和Wi-Fi 6E
除了Thunderbolt连接外,G733CX还提供了一个HDMI 2.1端口,背面的USB端口也可用于在路上充电(最大100瓦)。大部分连接都在后面,你只能在左侧找到两个普通的USB-A端口和3.5毫米音频端口。右侧还提供了一个华硕键鼠的插槽,允许你存储系统设置和数据。
采用英特尔AX211的无线局域网性能非常好,我们也能够毫无困难地连接到华硕参考路由器的6GHz网络。还有一个2.5Gbit/s的以太网连接用于有线连接。ROG Strix Scar 17的用户必须没有网络摄像头,但如果有必要,制造商提供了一个相应的外部网络摄像头(ROG Eye S)。
Networking | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average of class Gaming (853 - 1857, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (883 - 1857, n=148) | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average of class Gaming (843 - 1878, n=65, last 2 years) | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (713 - 1851, n=149) | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average of class Gaming (685 - 1890, n=136, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (826 - 1890, n=142) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average of class Gaming (648 - 1780, n=129, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (464 - 1861, n=142) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 |
输入设备 - 带有良好键盘的华硕
显示屏 - QHD,240赫兹
除了我们在去年的Scar 17 G733QS中测试的360赫兹全高清面板外,还有 去年的Scar 17 G733QS华硕还提供了一个刷新率为240赫兹的QHD面板,这就是我们测试单元中的面板。哑光IPS面板(2560 x 1440像素,16:9)的主观图像印象非常好,除了杜比视界HDR之外,还支持自适应同步。响应时间非常快,而且没有使用PWM。亮度平均约为300cd/m²,这也与360Hz的全高清面板的水平相同。另一方面,黑值有点高,也导致了1000:1左右的平庸的对比度。
|
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 320 cd/m²
Contrast: 1067:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5.1
ΔE Greyscale 1.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
84.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.13
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W NE173QHM-NZ2, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30 | Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE NE160QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Sharp SHP1544 LQ173M1JW08, IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 17.30 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 BOE0A99, IPS, 2560x1600, 17.00 | Alienware x17 R2 P48E AU Optronics B173HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30 | Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AU Optronics B173HAN05.4, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -16% | -14% | -16% | -8% | -14% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 97.1 | 69.3 -29% | 70.8 -27% | 69 -29% | 79.2 -18% | 71 -27% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 98.2 -2% | 98.9 -1% | 99.8 0% | 99.8 0% | 99.4 -1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 84.8 | 70.8 -17% | 73 -14% | 69.6 -18% | 79.6 -6% | 72.2 -15% |
Response Times | -38% | 48% | -25% | -55% | -12% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 5.7 ? | 12.6 ? -121% | 3.03 ? 47% | 10.8 ? -89% | 12.4 ? -118% | 6.6 ? -16% |
Response Time Black / White * | 10.1 ? | 5.6 ? 45% | 5.28 ? 48% | 6.1 ? 40% | 9.2 ? 9% | 10.8 ? -7% |
PWM Frequency | ||||||
Screen | -41% | -63% | -9% | -89% | -25% | |
Brightness middle | 320 | 547 71% | 280 -12% | 415 30% | 365.4 14% | 303.8 -5% |
Brightness | 303 | 523 73% | 275 -9% | 399 32% | 344 14% | 292 -4% |
Brightness Distribution | 87 | 88 1% | 79 -9% | 90 3% | 85 -2% | 85 -2% |
Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.44 -47% | 0.4 -33% | 0.43 -43% | 0.29 3% | 0.23 23% |
Contrast | 1067 | 1243 16% | 700 -34% | 965 -10% | 1260 18% | 1321 24% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 2.1 -91% | 2.1 -91% | 1.44 -31% | 3.17 -188% | 1.87 -70% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.7 | 7 -159% | 5.83 -116% | 2.33 14% | 7.69 -185% | 3.26 -21% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 3.2 -191% | 3.3 -200% | 1.8 -64% | 5.3 -382% | 2.7 -145% |
Gamma | 2.13 103% | 2.23 99% | 2.13 103% | 2.132 103% | 2.18 101% | 2.26 97% |
CCT | 6599 98% | 6979 93% | 7060 92% | 6327 103% | 5879 111% | 6436 101% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.9 | 1.58 | 0.89 | 0.51 | 1.45 | |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 65.6 | |||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.4 | |||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -32% /
-35% | -10% /
-35% | -17% /
-13% | -51% /
-65% | -17% /
-20% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
10.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise | |
↘ 5.1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.8 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
5.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.7 ms rise | |
↘ 3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (34.3 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18694 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
性能 - 刹车后的英特尔HX
测试条件
ROG软件提供广泛的配置选项和电源配置文件。例如,你可以完全停用集成GPU(MUX)或手动设置CPU和GPU的功率值。对于我们下面的基准和测量,我们使用性能配置文件,因为这已经使全部GPU性能可用。虽然在Turbo模式下,CPU的性能甚至略高,但在我们看来,这并不能证明风扇噪音的显著提高。
处理器 - 酷睿i9-12950HX
芯片英特尔酷睿i9-12950HX是目前英特尔最快的移动处理器。尽管它能够消耗高达175瓦的功率,但在我们的测试装置中,它远远没有达到这个数值。相反,我们看到最大消耗为115瓦(即使是在涡轮模式下),在某些时候,该值达到了70瓦(涡轮模式下为105瓦)。虽然CPU的性能一点也不差,但你也可以用普通的酷睿i9获得这样的性能,而HX芯片的额外溢价并不值得额外花费。
在电池运行时,功耗被限制在35瓦,导致多核性能降低约40%。你可以在我们相应的技术部分找到更多的CPU基准测试 我们相应的技术部分.
Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (16277 - 23113, n=7) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34613, n=237, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (1465 - 1922, n=7) | |
Average of class Gaming (527 - 2169, n=235, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (6625 - 8777, n=7) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=235, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (703 - 741, n=7) | |
Average of class Gaming (169 - 825, n=235, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (2464 - 3530, n=7) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=241, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 312, n=240, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (167 - 276, n=7) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Average of class Gaming (87 - 1259, n=233, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (138 - 193, n=7) | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (65637 - 85019, n=7) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=232, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (6022 - 6318, n=7) | |
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=233, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (14028 - 16009, n=7) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=239, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (1847 - 1945, n=7) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2139, n=239, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (18.6 - 26.5, n=7) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=236, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=231, last 2 years) | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (34.7 - 45.4, n=7) | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
Average of class Gaming (0.375 - 4.47, n=233, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (0.4251 - 0.4515, n=7) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (15499 - 22868, n=7) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average of class Gaming (2585 - 60169, n=229, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (77846 - 115907, n=7) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average of class Gaming (12439 - 252486, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (3426 - 5069, n=7) | |
Average of class Gaming (629 - 10389, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 200651, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (102752 - 104726, n=7) | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (10134 - 12823, n=7) | |
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 32988, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (37146 - 57340, n=7) | |
Average of class Gaming (7135 - 134044, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (72599 - 181128, n=7) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average of class Gaming (18146 - 328679, n=229, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (996 - 1417, n=7) | |
Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2409, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (8455 - 12432, n=7) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average of class Gaming (1437 - 31796, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (35479 - 42655, n=7) | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Average of class Gaming (8341 - 60161, n=230, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 |
系统性能
主观性能印象很好,这也被良好的基准测试结果所证实。在测试过程中,我们完全没有注意到任何问题。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average of class Gaming (5288 - 18475, n=199, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average of class Gaming (907 - 2166, n=160, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average of class Gaming (1027 - 2514, n=160, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | |
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 2275, n=160, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 |
PCMark 10 Score | 7208 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (59731 - 64732, n=7) | |
Average of class Gaming (18074 - 88014, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (59744 - 70359, n=7) | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average of class Gaming (20318 - 89096, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (57750 - 67899, n=7) | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average of class Gaming (15975 - 103259, n=229, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (84.5 - 92.2, n=7) | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average of class Gaming (76.2 - 136.8, n=226, last 2 years) | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 |
* ... smaller is better
存储解决方案
华硕在这里使用了两个来自三星的快速2TB固态硬盘(PM91A)的RAID 0配置。这允许超过10GB/s的极高传输率。然而,在恒定的负载下,性能并不稳定,反而大量下降。但这在日常游戏中不应该造成任何限制。你可以找到更多的SSD基准测试 这里.
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
华硕使用GeForce RTX 3080 Ti版本,其TGP为150瓦,而且GPU还能使用处理器的额外25瓦动态提升。它在性能模式下也能达到这个数值(175瓦),所以没有必要使用涡轮模式。还有一个MUX,允许你完全停用集成GPU(需要重新启动),这可以改善游戏时的延迟,但对图形性能本身没有太大影响。
图形性能属于顶级性能组,也高于我们数据库中RTX 3080 Ti的平均数值。此外,图形性能保持完全稳定。3DMarkTime Spy 压力测试顺利通过,在我们的TheWitcher 3 恒定负载测试中也没有性能下降。游戏性能很容易满足原生QHD分辨率下的最大细节,即使在要求很高的游戏中也是如此。
在电池操作中,允许GPU最大消耗44瓦,这相当于性能下降了约70%。你可以在这里找到额外的GPU基准测试移动显示芯片——基准测试成绩列表 。
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS -2! | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E -4! | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE -2! |