Notebookcheck Logo
联想 ThinkTab X11 平板电脑评测

首款全能平板:配备双USB接口、5G和触控笔——联想ThinkTab X11评测

如需耐用型,请告知。

作为联想Think系列时隔许久推出的首款Android 平板电脑,ThinkTab X11 Gen 1 搭载了在平板电脑领域已几乎绝迹的诸多功能,包括SD卡插槽和3.5毫米耳机插孔。但得益于对eSIM和NFC的支持,这款性能强劲的ThinkTab X11 Gen 1 仍是一款功能极为丰富的设备。
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Touchscreen Tablet Rugged

评测 - 联想 ThinkTab X11 第一代

鲜有其他平板电脑能像ThinkTab X11这样兼具如此全面的功能和超长的电池续航时间。作为联想Think系列时隔许久推出的首款Android 平板电脑,它几乎满足了您在商务和个人使用方面的所有需求。 然而,对于那些无法充分利用这些丰富功能、仅仅想找一台平板电脑在沙发上休闲娱乐的用户来说,ThinkTab X11的重量可能会让他们感到失望。

在这个价位段,芯片组的选择多少有些令人失望,尤其是对于平板电脑而言。 联想采用了骁龙7s Gen 3,这是一款性能略显不足的SoC,在驱动1600p分辨率时常常力不从心。其亮度和色彩准确度也比不上Poco Pad X1或小米平板8。

不过,对于那些欣赏这款联想功能强大的设备所提供的丰富应用的用户来说,我们的批评意见应该不会成为问题。在Android 领域,几乎找不到能与之媲美的平板电脑体验;而且得益于其坚固耐用的外壳,ThinkTab X11对于户外爱好者或建筑工地用户来说,也是一款极具吸引力的选择。

Pros

+ 主要特点
+ 5G + eSIM
+ 高耐用性
+ 长续航时间
+ 发热量极低
+ 无PWM的高对比度LCD屏
+ 可拆卸电池

Cons

- 屏幕亮度低
- 处理器性能弱
- 机身厚重

价格与供货情况 - 联想 ThinkTab X11

ThinkTab X11 将于 6 月 15 日上市,建议零售价约为 579 美元起。我们收到的评测样机配置包含 5G 调制解调器和配件,需额外支付 170 美元。

规格 - 联想 ThinkTab X11 第一代

Lenovo ThinkTab X11
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 8c/8t, 1 x 2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A720, 3 x 2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A720, 4 x 1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A520, Cortex-A720 / A520
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 810
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR5
Display
10.95 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 276 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen, native pen support, IPS LCD, Corning Gorilla Glass, HDR, 90 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3,5 mm jack, Card Reader: microSDXC, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG, connector pins, Miracast
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.4
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.9 x 257.1 x 168.7
Battery
10200 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 16
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix (AF)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (FF)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, USB cable, 24 Months Warranty, Beidou + GPS + GLONASS + Galileo + QZSS + A-GP (5G version), fanless, ruggedized, waterproof
Weight
650 g
Price
500 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

案例——一款配备可更换电池的Android 防水平板电脑

ThinkTab X11(配备可拆卸电池)
ThinkTab X11(配备可拆卸电池)

初次拿起ThinkTab X11的人,很可能会对其作为一款11英寸平板电脑的重量感到惊讶。不过,同类注重耐用性的设备也同样沉重。值得称道的是,这款联想中端平板电脑内置的电池非常容易更换。 10,200毫安时的电池容量对于其机身尺寸而言也相当充裕。

据厂商称,除了IP68认证外,ThinkTab X11还通过了美国空军、陆军和海军采用的防护标准MIL-STD-810H下的各项测试。屏幕采用康宁大猩猩玻璃作为保护层。

机身做工令人满意,但塑料外壳在一定程度上削弱了整体的高端质感。尽管如此,背部略带橡胶质感的表面并不显得廉价。包围 IPS 面板的边框也相当宽,导致屏占比仅为 80%。作为对比, 小米平板8 在此方面的屏占比则接近86%。

尺寸对比

257.1 mm 168.7 mm 9.9 mm 650 g251.22 mm 173.42 mm 6.18 mm 500 g251.2 mm 173.4 mm 5.8 mm 485 g242.9 mm 170.2 mm 10.2 mm 683 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g

产品特点——联想首款ThinkPad平板电脑配备NFC功能和3.5毫米耳机插孔

联想几乎将所有可能的功能都融入了这款中端平板电脑中。ThinkTab X11 凭借其两个 USB-C 接口真正脱颖而出。设备右侧的主接口支持 USB 3.2,数据传输速度极快。

设备底部的第二个 USB-C 接口则支持 USB 2.0。这种组合设计让用户在平板电脑连接电源时,既能传输数据,又能使用 DisplayPort 输出功能。此外,还可通过随附的 3.5 毫米音频接口同时连接耳机聆听音乐。

但其功能远不止于此。 ThinkTab X11 还内置了 NFC 芯片、电子罗盘和振动马达。其内部 UFS 3.1 存储空间也可通过 SD 卡插槽进行扩展。 该卡槽支持最大 2TB(exFAT 格式)的存储卡,在我们的测试中,其传输速度高达近 50 MB/s。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo ThinkTab X11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (Angelbird V60)
48.9 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (Angelbird V60)
47.6 MB/s -3%
Average of class Tablet
  (10.2 - 57.4, n=43, last 2 years)
37.1 MB/s -24%

跨平台磁盘测试 (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Lenovo ThinkTab X11 Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø43.3 (29.5-54.1) MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø41.1 (29.6-54) MB/s
Lenovo ThinkTab X11 Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø80.9 (13.2-89.4) MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø79.7 (59.1-88.5) MB/s

软件 - ThinkTab X11 第一代搭载Android s 16,是否提供长期更新?

联想为其中端平板电脑搭载了基于Android 16开发的自研ZUI界面(第18版)。与支持DeX功能的三星设备类似,ThinkTab X11也可通过类桌面界面进行操作。

升级数据库显示,ThinkTab X11将获得三个主要版本的Android 系统更新及四年的安全补丁支持,而EPREL数据库则显示其支持周期为七年。

联想 ThinkTab X11 软件评测
联想 ThinkTab X11 软件评测
联想 ThinkTab X11 软件评测

可持续发展

这款联想平板电脑采用(据推测)无塑料包装。制造商未提供有关再生材料的信息,其碳足迹为62千克二氧化碳当量。ThinkTab X11在EPREL数据库中被列为最高可维修等级A。

通信与GNSS——一款支持5G但不支持WiFi 7的坚固型平板电脑

ThinkTab X11 采用 WiFi 6E 标准,该标准同时支持 6 GHz 频段。在与华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 进行的测试中,我们获得了高速且稳定的数据传输速度。

在移动网络方面,ThinkTab X11 配备了集成蜂窝调制解调器,支持通过卫星和 A-GPS 进行定位追踪。除 nano-SIM 卡槽外,还支持 eSIM。

由于我们仅收到 WiFi 版本,因此无法测试其定位追踪功能。

Networking
Lenovo ThinkTab X11
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1286 (min: 1197) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1637 (min: 1530) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
937 (min: 835) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
944 (min: 831) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1804 (min: 1617) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1589 (min: 1487) MBit/s ∼97%
Xiaomi Pad 8
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
734 (min: 649) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1642 (min: 1493) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
690 (min: 500) MBit/s ∼38%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1359 (min: 1080) MBit/s ∼83%
Average Wi-Fi 6E
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
954 (min: 227) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
940 (min: 442) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1375 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1340 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼82%
Average of class Tablet
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
604 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼63%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
730 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼77%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1234 (min: 330) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1480 (min: 291) MBit/s ∼90%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700175018001850Tooltip
Lenovo ThinkTab X11 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1286 (1197-1357) MBit/s
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1804 (1617-1884) MBit/s
Lenovo ThinkTab X11 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1637 (1530-1695) MBit/s
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1588 (1487-1628) MBit/s
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø937 (835-971) MBit/s
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø943 (831-988) MBit/s

相机——一款配备自动对焦功能的Android 平板电脑,适合大学或学校使用

用 ThinkTab X11 的前置摄像头拍的一张自拍
用 ThinkTab X11 的前置摄像头拍的一张自拍

不出所料,作为一款平板电脑,联想并未在ThinkTab X11上特别强调拍照质量。后置主摄像头仅为1300万像素,且自动对焦速度较慢。不过,其成像质量足以满足在施工现场拍摄快照或扫描文档的需求。 整体而言,其锐度和色彩还原表现尚可。

前置摄像头采用800万像素定焦镜头,非常适合高清视频通话。

联想 ThinkTab X11 摄像头窗口评测
联想 ThinkTab X11 摄像头窗口评测
联想 ThinkTab X11 摄像头窗口评测

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Plant motifCity motifLow light
ColorChecker
10 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
8 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
10 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
7 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
8 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo ThinkTab X11: 8.18 ∆E min: 3.92 - max: 13.7 ∆E
ColorChecker
29 ∆E
52.6 ∆E
38.3 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
43.9 ∆E
61.6 ∆E
52.6 ∆E
34.7 ∆E
41.1 ∆E
27.3 ∆E
63.2 ∆E
63.4 ∆E
29.9 ∆E
46.8 ∆E
36 ∆E
74.1 ∆E
42.2 ∆E
42.9 ∆E
85.6 ∆E
69.5 ∆E
51.5 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
13 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo ThinkTab X11: 45.62 ∆E min: 12.99 - max: 85.6 ∆E

配件与保修 - ThinkTab X11 随附 Lenovo Tab Pen XE 及 Rugged Smart Case

ThinkPad X11 随附一条 USB-C 数据线和一份快速入门指南,此外还有多种套装可供选择。 我们评测的样机包含充电器、带电池的联想 Tab Pen XE 以及 Rugged Smart Case。联想还提供可选的 Stylus Tab Pen Plus,售价约 65 美元,该笔配备 USB-C 接口用于充电。

零售商通常提供 24 个月 保修,可通过“送修”服务或快递服务进行维修。根据产品规格表,还提供一年或三年的保修套餐。

输入设备与操作——一款支持触控笔和指纹传感器的11英寸平板电脑

ThinkPad X11 配备的 10.95 英寸液晶屏输入精准,无论是用手指还是触控笔操作,都给我们留下了深刻印象。在手写笔记方面,其他平板电脑的输入精度略胜一筹;不过,使用 Tab Pen XE 时,我们发现快速移动时数位板会出现明显的拖尾现象。

为了实现安全的解锁,设备顶部的电源按钮中集成了一个指纹传感器。用食指操作非常方便,且响应可靠、速度极快。此外,还可以使用前置摄像头进行安全性较低的2D人脸识别。

联想 ThinkTab X11 触控屏评测
联想 ThinkTab X11 触控屏评测
联想 ThinkTab X11 触控屏评测

显示屏——一款中端平板电脑,虽未采用OLED屏幕,但对比度极佳

子像素排列
子像素排列

这款90Hz屏幕采用16:10的宽高比,分辨率为1600p。其像素密度达到276 PPI,虽然足够高,但部分中端平板电脑的显示效果更为清晰。小米同价位消费级平板电脑的屏幕亮度也更高。

在我们的测试中,使用APL18测试图案时达到了最高亮度,紧随其后的是HDR视频。尽管如此,在无PWM的面板上,HDR效果并未得到最佳呈现,亮度仅达到约600 cd/m²。

501
cd/m²
509
cd/m²
515
cd/m²
520
cd/m²
529
cd/m²
499
cd/m²
483
cd/m²
503
cd/m²
504
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 529 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 507 cd/m² Minimum: 2.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 529 cd/m²
Contrast: 3306:1 (Black: 0.16 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 8.42 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.73}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 5.7 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.97}
97.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.819
CCT: 6516 K
Lenovo ThinkTab X11
IPS LCD, 2560x1600, 11"
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
TFT-LCD, 3200x2136, 11.2"
Xiaomi Pad 8
IPS, 3200x2136, 11.2"
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1"
Screen
2%
19%
-1%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)
529
794
50%
627
19%
757
43%
Brightness (cd/m²)
507
727
43%
613
21%
730
44%
Brightness Distribution (%)
91
89
-2%
96
5%
91
0%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
0.16
0.47
-194%
0.3
-88%
0.47
-194%
Contrast (:1)
3306
1689
-49%
2090
-37%
1611
-51%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
8.42
2.2
74%
1.25
85%
2.85
66%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
13.3
5.8
56%
2.95
78%
6.16
54%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.7
3.7
35%
1.8
68%
4.1
28%
Gamma
2.819 78%
2.25 98%
2.183 101%
2.229 99%
CCT
6516 100%
6962 93%
6898 94%
7510 87%

* ... smaller is better

Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
788 cd/m² +31%
Lenovo ThinkTab X11
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
601 cd/m²
Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Lenovo ThinkTab X11
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
587 cd/m²
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
574 cd/m² -2%

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7804 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

经分光光度计测量,其黑场亮度仅为0.16 cd/m²,对于这款IPS面板而言,这已是相当出色的对比度表现。但在色彩准确度方面,ThinkPad X11的表现稍显逊色。我们使用标准配置文件测量了各色之间最微小的差异。

色彩准确度(配置文件:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩准确度(配置文件:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(配置文件:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(配置文件:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩饱和度(配置文件:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩饱和度(配置文件:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
19.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.2 ms rise
↘ 8.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (19.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
29.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.2 ms rise
↘ 13.1 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (31.1 ms).
联想 ThinkTab X11 可视角度评测
联想 ThinkTab X11 户外评测

性能——ThinkTab X11 内置的骁龙芯片组在速度方面存在不足

联想为其中端平板电脑配备了 骁龙7s Gen 3 ,并配备了8GB LPDDR5内存。虽然这款4纳米SoC提供了稳健的CPU性能,但显然仍不及 Poco Pad X1 。不过,Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro的性能表现与其相当。

在日常使用中,系统运行总体流畅,但骁龙芯片组有时难以应对显示屏的高分辨率。此外,ThinkTab X11偶尔会出现卡顿现象。

Geekbench 6.6
Single-Core
Xiaomi Pad 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
2135 Points +81%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 8192
1869 Points +58%
Average of class Tablet
  (323 - 4128, n=88, last 2 years)
1661 Points +41%
Lenovo ThinkTab X11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192
1181 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (1158 - 1188, n=9)
1171 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 6144
1158 Points -2%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Pad 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
6832 Points +102%
Average of class Tablet
  (1104 - 16544, n=88, last 2 years)
5264 Points +56%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 8192
5230 Points +55%
Lenovo ThinkTab X11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192
3375 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 6144
3322 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (3232 - 3426, n=9)
3311 Points -2%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 8192
16011 Points +31%
Xiaomi Pad 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
15944 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 6144
13966 Points +14%
Average of class Tablet
  (7084 - 27428, n=62, last 2 years)
13919 Points +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (10617 - 15606, n=7)
13531 Points +11%
Lenovo ThinkTab X11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192
12238 Points
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Tablet
  (319 - 2375, n=48, last 2 years)
1030 Points +27%
Lenovo ThinkTab X11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192
809 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (689 - 809, n=8)
753 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 6144
691 Points -15%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Pad 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
9942 Points +63%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 8192
8570 Points +41%
Average of class Tablet
  (195 - 13159, n=56, last 2 years)
6494 Points +7%
Lenovo ThinkTab X11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192
6082 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 6144
5789 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (5402 - 6082, n=6)
5660 Points -7%
System
Xiaomi Pad 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
12968 Points +56%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 8192
11365 Points +37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 6144
10168 Points +23%
Average of class Tablet
  (904 - 18343, n=56, last 2 years)
9644 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (7930 - 10168, n=6)
9198 Points +11%
Lenovo ThinkTab X11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192
8291 Points
Memory
Xiaomi Pad 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
11076 Points +47%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 8192
9332 Points +24%
Average of class Tablet
  (401 - 17963, n=56, last 2 years)
7716 Points +3%
Lenovo ThinkTab X11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192
7511 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (5642 - 8078, n=6)
7154 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 6144
7102 Points -5%
Graphics
Xiaomi Pad 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
33512 Points +425%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 8192
25400 Points +298%
Average of class Tablet
  (88 - 55810, n=56, last 2 years)
17514 Points +174%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 6144
9618 Points +51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (6389 - 9618, n=6)
8781 Points +37%
Lenovo ThinkTab X11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192
6389 Points
Web
Xiaomi Pad 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
2101 Points +24%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 8192
2002 Points +18%
Lenovo ThinkTab X11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192
1699 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 6144
1617 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (1566 - 1699, n=6)
1608 Points -5%
Average of class Tablet
  (10 - 2370, n=56, last 2 years)
1607 Points -5%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Tablet
  (3564 - 76852, n=53, last 2 years)
17817 Points +96%
Xiaomi Pad 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
16995 Points +87%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 8192
14598 Points +61%
Lenovo ThinkTab X11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192
9089 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (8460 - 9089, n=6)
8707 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 6144
8555 Points -6%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.7
Average of class Tablet
  (166 - 5295, n=43, last 2 years)
812 Points +237%
Xiaomi Pad 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
469 Points +95%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 8192
440 Points +83%
Lenovo ThinkTab X11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192
241 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (229 - 241, n=5)
235 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 6144
229 Points -5%
Half Precision NPU 1.7
Average of class Tablet
  (154 - 41155, n=43, last 2 years)
4155 Points +1603%
Xiaomi Pad 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
468 Points +92%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 8192
442 Points +81%
Lenovo ThinkTab X11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192
244 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (230 - 244, n=5)
236 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 6144
230 Points -6%
Quantized NPU 1.7
Average of class Tablet
  (88 - 57388, n=43, last 2 years)
6014 Points +1003%
Xiaomi Pad 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
1032 Points +89%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 8192
1012 Points +86%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 6144
547 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (545 - 548, n=5)
547 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkTab X11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192
545 Points
AI Benchmark - Score V6
Xiaomi Pad 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
7948 Points +405%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 8192
5079 Points +223%
Average of class Tablet
  (70.4 - 17728, n=33, last 2 years)
3973 Points +153%
Lenovo ThinkTab X11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192
1573 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (1246 - 1573, n=4)
1395 Points -11%
Antutu v11 - Score
Xiaomi Pad 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
2274547 Points +117%
Average of class Tablet
  (522205 - 3282461, n=8, last 2 years)
1752322 Points +67%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 8192
1743279 Points +66%
Lenovo ThinkTab X11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192
1047646 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (n=1)
1047646 Points 0%

集成 Adreno 810 负责图形处理,但在GFXBench 4K测试中,其表现极其缓慢,帧率不足10帧/秒。结果是,这款设备在其价位段内提供的处理性能十分有限。尽管分辨率更高,但 小米平板8 在同一测试中却能达到30帧以上。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Pad 8
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
4499 Points +314%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2893 Points +166%
Lenovo ThinkTab X11
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1087 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1068 Points -2%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Pad 8
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
4545 Points +314%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2960 Points +169%
Lenovo ThinkTab X11
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1099 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1093 Points -1%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Pad 8
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
17946 Points +328%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11377 Points +171%
Lenovo ThinkTab X11
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4191 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4180 Points 0%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Xiaomi Pad 8
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
8557 Points
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Pad 8
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
8711 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Pad 8
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
1835 Points +342%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
939 Points +126%
Lenovo ThinkTab X11
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
415 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Xiaomi Pad 8
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
1847 Points +348%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
934 Points +127%
Lenovo ThinkTab X11
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
412 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 8
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps +69%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +69%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
113 fps +59%
Lenovo ThinkTab X11
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 8
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
570 fps +396%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
484 fps +321%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
130 fps +13%
Lenovo ThinkTab X11
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
115 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Pad 8
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
114 fps +178%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
100 fps +144%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
76 fps +85%
Lenovo ThinkTab X11
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
41 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 8
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
341 fps +355%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
265 fps +253%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
85 fps +13%
Lenovo ThinkTab X11
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 8
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
73 fps +192%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
57 fps +128%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
56 fps +124%
Lenovo ThinkTab X11
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
25 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 8
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
237 fps +384%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
185 fps +278%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
62 fps +27%
Lenovo ThinkTab X11
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 8
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
41 fps +193%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
33 fps +136%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
33 fps +136%
Lenovo ThinkTab X11
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 8
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
136 fps +369%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
101 fps +248%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps +17%
Lenovo ThinkTab X11
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
29 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 8
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
39 fps +225%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
29 fps +142%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps +108%
Lenovo ThinkTab X11
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 8
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
68 fps +386%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52 fps +271%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps +21%
Lenovo ThinkTab X11
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 8
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
56 fps +211%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
46 fps +156%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
43 fps +139%
Lenovo ThinkTab X11
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 8
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
174 fps +383%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
136 fps +278%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
45 fps +25%
Lenovo ThinkTab X11
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 8
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
31 fps +425%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24 fps +307%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.6 fps +29%
Lenovo ThinkTab X11
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5.9 fps
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Pad 8 (Chrome 142)
71902 Points +57%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 (Chrome 143)
70183 Points +53%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 138481, n=75, last 2 years)
48866 Points +6%
Lenovo ThinkTab X11 (Chrome 148)
45934 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro (Chrome 137)
44836 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (37338 - 45934, n=7)
42636 Points -7%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (243 - 27101, n=68, last 2 years)
2251 ms * -143%
Lenovo ThinkTab X11 (Chrome 148)
925.3 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (862 - 1044, n=6)
913 ms * +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro (Chrome 137)
880.5 ms * +5%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 (Chrome 143)
543.9 ms * +41%
Xiaomi Pad 8 (Chrome 142)
527 ms * +43%
Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 (Chrome 143)
256.364 Points +51%
Average of class Tablet (61.3 - 579, n=37, last 2 years)
217 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro (Chrome 137)
170.006 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkTab X11 (Chrome 148)
169.965 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (160.6 - 170, n=4)
166.2 Points -2%
WebXPRT 5 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (40 - 81, n=2, last 2 years)
60.5 Points +51%
Lenovo ThinkTab X11 (Chrome 148)
40 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (n=1)
40 Points 0%

* ... smaller is better

Lenovo ThinkTab X11Xiaomi Poco Pad X1Xiaomi Pad 8Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 ProAverage 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
43%
60%
-58%
-1%
3%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)
2073.41
4068.41
96%
3899.2
88%
1009
-51%
1770 ?(950 - 3497, n=122)
-15%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)
1872.23
3751.24
100%
3391.2
81%
291
-84%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)
236.94
203.66
-14%
325.1
37%
193
-19%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)
264.1
237.72
-10%
348.2
32%
63
-76%

排放情况——这款酷炫的Android 平板电脑不存在SoC降频问题

温度

ThinkPad X11 的表面温度在任何情况下都保持在安全范围内,即使在 3DMark 压力测试中也是如此。此外,我们未检测到任何明显的降频现象。

Max. Load
 33.3 °C34.1 °C30.3 °C 
 29.9 °C29.7 °C29.5 °C 
 28.2 °C28.4 °C27.2 °C 
Maximum: 34.1 °C
Average: 30.1 °C
28.7 °C34.5 °C37.3 °C
29 °C31 °C31.6 °C
25.9 °C28.5 °C28.9 °C
Maximum: 37.3 °C
Average: 30.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  39.6 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.6 °C / 92 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.8 % +1%
Lenovo ThinkTab X11
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.2 %
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
86 % -13%
Xiaomi Pad 8
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
84.9 % -14%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.8 % +1%
Lenovo ThinkTab X11
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98.8 %
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
95.1 % -4%
Xiaomi Pad 8
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
82 % -17%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Lenovo ThinkTab X11
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98.4 %
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
97.4 % -1%
Xiaomi Pad 8
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
90 % -9%
05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
Lenovo ThinkTab X11 Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø3.86 (3.83-3.88) %
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø17.5 (17.4-18.3) %
Lenovo ThinkTab X11 Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø25.3 (25.2-25.4) %
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø61.7 (56.1-65.2) %

演讲嘉宾

这两款音箱支持杜比全景声(Dolby Atmos),音质表现不错。不过,低频部分可以更突出一些,而在粉红噪声频段中,极高频的细节则明显有所缺失。

音频输出既可以通过3.5毫米接口实现,也可以通过蓝牙5.4无线传输。后者支持多种编解码器。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs206.627.12511.728.83113.330.1409.434.55016.429.36321.722.98021.922.71001828.11257.939.516014.849.52007.85725016.661.731533.367.140021.26250013.662.763015.567.280013.969.6100014.872.7125010.875.816004.772.320001.270.625004.673.631502.368.940000.666.65000-3.666.86300-4.364.78000-5.173.110000-3.97912500-466.616000-3.548.9SPL2883.8N0.759.5median 13.6median 66.8Delta9.26.640.840.435.533.430.332.737.230.232.633.418.223.318.328.721.140.418.647.11652.116.256.618.360.217.866.914.266.314.968.918.873.520.374.216.881.314.882.21782.21479.812.679.91282.711.876.71273.412.171.81274.31274.611.870.511.453.927.1910.985.2median 14.8median 73.538.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo ThinkTab X11Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo ThinkTab X11 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间——ThinkTab X11 配备大容量可更换电池,深受重度用户的喜爱

功耗

尽管ThinkTab X11配备了10,200毫安时电池,支持最高45瓦的有线充电,但不支持无线充电。

其功耗表现堪称高效。在待机模式下功耗低于2瓦,这款联想平板电脑的功耗非常低。即使在满载运行时,ThinkTab X11的能耗也低于 Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.3 / 1.5 / 1.7 Watt
Load midlight 4.3 / 6.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo ThinkTab X11
10200 mAh
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
8850 mAh
Xiaomi Pad 8
9200 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro
10100 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
 
Average of class Tablet
 
Power Consumption
-35%
-43%
-124%
-6%
-120%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)
1.3
0.7
46%
1.3
-0%
3.5
-169%
1.294 ?(0.67 - 3.5, n=7)
-0%
Idle Average * (Watt)
1.5
2.45
-63%
2
-33%
3.7
-147%
1.667 ?(0.94 - 3.7, n=7)
-11%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)
1.7
2.58
-52%
2.3
-35%
4.1
-141%
1.827 ?(1 - 4.1, n=7)
-7%
Load Average * (Watt)
4.3
7.31
-70%
6.6
-53%
7.5
-74%
4.43 ?(3.29 - 7.5, n=6)
-3%
Load Maximum * (Watt)
6.8
9.17
-35%
13.3
-96%
12.7
-87%
7.57 ?(4.75 - 12.7, n=6)
-11%

* ... smaller is better

功耗:Geekbench(150 cd/m²)

0123456789Tooltip
Lenovo ThinkTab X11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.72 (1.376-6.25) Watt
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.29 (0.969-9.16) Watt
Lenovo ThinkTab X11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.16 (1.489-4.69) Watt
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.726 (0.693-0.912) Watt

功耗:GFXbench(150 cd/m²)

0123456789Tooltip
Lenovo ThinkTab X11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.06 (3.87-4.34) Watt
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.98 (8.77-9.12) Watt
Lenovo ThinkTab X11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.16 (1.489-4.69) Watt
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.726 (0.693-0.912) Watt

电池续航时间

在我们的实际电池测试中,当屏幕亮度调整为150 cd/m²时,这款联想平板电脑展现出了极佳的续航表现。在这方面,ThinkPad X11的续航时间比 Apple iPad 10

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 148)
29h 56min
Lenovo ThinkTab X11
10200 mAh
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
8850 mAh
Xiaomi Pad 8
9200 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro
10100 mAh
Battery runtime
WiFi v1.3 (h)
29.9
13.9
-54%
20.7
-31%
22.6
-24%

Notebookcheck 综合评分

ThinkTab X11 具备一系列功能,这是目前市面上其他Android 平板电脑鲜少能提供的。联想耗时近15年才将ThinkPad 18382DG平板电脑的继任者推向市场,而如今这款产品已形成一个独立的产品类别。

联想 ThinkTab X11 笔记本电脑评测
联想 ThinkTab X11 笔记本电脑评测

Lenovo ThinkTab X11 - 06/10/2026 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
87 / 98 → 88%
Keyboard
69 / 80 → 87%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
67 / 69 → 97%
Weight
81 / 40-88 → 85%
Battery
96%
Display
81%
Games Performance
14 / 65 → 21%
Application Performance
63 / 92 → 68%
AI Performance
15%
Temperature
95%
Noise
100%
Audio
80 / 91 → 88%
Camera
59 / 90 → 65%
Average
72%
82%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
87.6%
Materials
25%
Packaging
85%
Power Use
94.9%
Repairability
80%
Software Updates
75%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 74.6%

可能的替代方案对比

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
81.9%
Lenovo ThinkTab X11
Lenovo ThinkTab X11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 3.1
Amazon:
1. $242.06
Lenovo Idea Tab - College Ta...
2. $212.50
Lenovo Idea Tab - College Ta...
3. $249.00
Lenovo Idea Tab 11" Tablet w...
List Price: 500€
650 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash10.95"
2560x1600
276 PPI
IPS LCD
2.
85.8%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 732 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x
Amazon: List Price: 389€500 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash11.20"
3200x2136
344 PPI
TFT-LCD
3.
87.1%
Xiaomi Pad 8
Xiaomi Pad 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 825 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x
Amazon:
1. $439.50
XIAOMI Pad 8 Ai WiFi Version...
2. $385.00
XIAOMI Pad 8 Ai WiFi Version...
3. $699.99
XIAOMI Pad 8 Pro Ai WiFi Ver...
List Price: 437€
485 g256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash11.20"
3200x2136
344 PPI
IPS
4.
80.1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘
6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.2
Amazon:
List Price: 799€
683 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash10.10"
1920x1200
224 PPI
IPS

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Google LogoAdd as a preferred source on Google
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 首款全能平板:配备双USB接口、5G和触控笔——联想ThinkTab X11评测
Marcus Herbrich, 2026-06-15 (Update: 2026-06-15)