结论--1000 美元以下级别的强劲竞争对手
LG Gram 笔记本电脑通常非常轻巧,显示屏清晰艳丽。而 Gram Book 15 摒弃了这些可圈可点之处,机身设计沉闷,IPS 显示屏似乎是 2010 年代早期最差的显示屏之一。对比度差,色彩浅,充其量只能提供一般的观看体验。与此同时,竞争对手的经济型笔记本电脑,如 华硕 VivoBook S15或 联想 IdeaPad Slim 5-15可以提供 120 Hz 的 OLED 显示屏,而后者至少可以提供完整的 sRGB 色彩。
除了令人失望的显示屏外,其他核心方面,如薄弱的设计、较浅的按键和较弱的扬声器,都使该机型成为一款不合格的多媒体或内容创作机器。
它的一些优点包括:酷睿 U 系列 CPU 带来的超长电池续航时间和超静音风扇,内存和固态硬盘的升级也相对简单。除此之外,Gram Book 15 与联想、戴尔或华硕的其他经济型中端产品相比,并没有令人信服的地方。
Pros
Cons
LG Gram 系列以生产市场上最轻的笔记本电脑而闻名,其显示屏同样令人印象深刻。Gram Book 是 Gram 系列中的一个类别,专为有预算意识的买家和低配置机型设计。本次评测的 Gram Book 15 是市场上少数配备英特尔 Arrow Lake-U 处理器的 15.6 英寸 16:9 笔记本电脑之一。
我们的测试机配备了 Core Ultra 7 255U CPU、16 GB 可移动内存和 1080p IPS 显示屏,售价约 800 美元。Gram Book 15 的替代产品包括其他经济型多媒体笔记本电脑,如 惠普Pavilion 系列, 华硕 VivoBook 系列或 联想 IdeaPad 5 系列.
更多 LG 评论:
规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例
机身从上到下基本上都是哑光塑料,以反映其经济实惠的价位。挠曲和吱吱嘎嘎的声音时有发生,但幸好都很轻微,无需担心。由于笔记本的光滑表面很容易吸附油脂和指纹,因此需要经常清洁。
交流
为节约成本,不支持 Wi-Fi 6E 和 Wi-Fi 7。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
网络摄像头
虽然有一个物理隐私百叶窗,但不包括红外。

可持续性
制造商在生产过程中没有提及回收材料。
配件和保修
包装盒内除了交流适配器和文件外,没有其他附件。如果在美国购买,制造商通常提供一年有限保修。
输入设备
键程明显比传统的 ThinkPad T 系列甚至是华硕 VivoBook 等大多数经济型笔记本电脑。因此,按空格键、回车键或数字小键盘键时的反馈很弱,也不太令人满意。
显示屏
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 305.2 cd/m²
Contrast: 424:1 (Black: 0.72 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 6.78 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.76}
calibrated: 2.73
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 5.2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
39.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
56.9% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
37.9% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
CCT: 6197 K
| LG Gram 15U55T LG Philips LP156WFD-SPR1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 60 Hz | LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Samsung ATNA56YX08-0, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.6", 60 Hz | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R LEN153WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 15.3", 60 Hz | HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl CMN155D, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 60 Hz | Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Samsung SDC4180, OLED, 2880x1620, 15.6", 120 Hz | Dell Inspiron 15 Plus Dell INSPIRON LGD06A6, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 60 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 130% | 12% | 12% | 128% | 67% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 37.9 | 99.8 163% | 42.9 13% | 42.6 12% | 99.93 164% | 64.1 69% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 56.9 | 100 76% | 61.2 8% | 63.7 12% | 100 76% | 92.8 63% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 39.1 | 98.09 151% | 44.4 14% | 44.1 13% | 95.52 144% | 66.2 69% |
| Response Times | 93% | 19% | 14% | 93% | 13% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 34 ? | 2 ? 94% | 29.1 ? 14% | 32 ? 6% | 2 ? 94% | 31.6 ? 7% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 26.6 ? | 2 ? 92% | 20.2 ? 24% | 20.9 ? 21% | 2 ? 92% | 21.6 ? 19% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 240 | |||||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | ||||||
| Screen | 125% | 40% | 50% | 513% | 24% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 305.2 | 395 29% | 328.3 8% | 330.7 8% | 370.4 21% | 298 -2% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 304 | 392 29% | 313 3% | 292 -4% | 376 24% | 285 -6% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 86 | 97 13% | 92 7% | 77 -10% | 96 12% | 86 0% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.72 | 0.1 86% | 0.24 67% | 0.18 75% | 0.02 97% | 0.4 44% |
| Contrast (:1) | 424 | 3950 832% | 1368 223% | 1837 333% | 18520 4268% | 745 76% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.78 | 2.2 68% | 5.64 17% | 5.08 25% | 1.51 78% | 3.68 46% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 16.91 | 4.43 74% | 19.24 -14% | 17.95 -6% | 2.89 83% | 7.39 56% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.73 | 4.65 -70% | 3.13 -15% | 2.73 -0% | 3.36 -23% | 2.61 4% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.2 | 1.78 66% | 2.1 60% | 3.9 25% | 2.1 60% | 5.3 -2% |
| Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.39 92% | 2.12 104% | 2.26 97% | 2.2 100% | 2.102 105% |
| CCT | 6197 105% | 6284 103% | 6757 96% | 6607 98% | 6536 99% | 6143 106% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 116% /
122% | 24% /
31% | 25% /
36% | 245% /
371% | 35% /
32% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.8 ms rise | |
| ↘ 10.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 66 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.1 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16 ms rise | |
| ↘ 18 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (31.4 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8002 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前,我们将 Windows 设置为性能模式。
处理器
酷睿至尊 7 255U 酷睿至尊 7 255U LG Gram 15 比我们数据库中配备相同 CPU 的普通笔记本电脑要慢 10%。因此,它的性能非常接近惠普 Envy x360 15 上的上一代酷睿 Ultra 7 155U。
Cinebench R15 多回路运行
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance rating | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 Plus -2! | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (8586 - 12157, n=5) | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (1717 - 1915, n=5) | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (3178 - 4714, n=5) | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (657 - 738, n=5) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (1490 - 1957, n=5) | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (244 - 265, n=5) | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (315 - 418, n=5) | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (33768 - 44657, n=5) | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (5099 - 5229, n=5) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| Geekbench 6.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (9040 - 11075, n=5) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| Geekbench 6.5 / Single-Core | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (2223 - 2523, n=5) | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (7957 - 10220, n=5) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (1616 - 1859, n=5) | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (6.6 - 13.1, n=5) | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (47.3 - 60.5, n=5) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (0.4615 - 0.591, n=5) | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
| Performance rating | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 -1! | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 Plus -1! | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl -1! | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R -1! | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) -1! | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 (v6.75.6100) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 Plus (v6.50.5800) | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl (v6.92.6600) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R (v6.92.6600) | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) (v6.75.6100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (2214 - 8197, n=5) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 (v6.75.6100) | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl (v6.92.6600) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 Plus (v6.50.5800) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R (v6.92.6600) | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) (v6.75.6100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (12867 - 42808, n=5) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 (v6.75.6100) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 Plus (v6.50.5800) | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl (v6.92.6600) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R (v6.92.6600) | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) (v6.75.6100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (653 - 2333, n=5) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 (v6.75.6100) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 Plus (v6.50.5800) | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) (v6.75.6100) | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (13483 - 52445, n=5) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 (v6.75.6100) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 Plus (v6.50.5800) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R (v6.92.6600) | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) (v6.75.6100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (1662 - 5756, n=5) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 (v6.75.6100) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 Plus (v6.50.5800) | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl (v6.92.6600) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T (v8.20.8100) | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) (v6.75.6100) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (6395 - 21002, n=5) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 Plus (v6.50.5800) | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 (v6.75.6100) | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl (v6.92.6600) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R (v6.92.6600) | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) (v6.75.6100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (13243 - 45286, n=5) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 (v6.75.6100) | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl (v6.92.6600) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 Plus (v6.50.5800) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R (v6.92.6600) | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) (v6.75.6100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (167.2 - 710, n=5) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 (v6.75.6100) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 Plus (v6.50.5800) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl (v6.92.6600) | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) (v6.75.6100) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (1014 - 4418, n=5) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 (v6.75.6100) | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) (v6.75.6100) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R (v6.92.6600) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (13398 - 50233, n=5) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 Plus (v6.50.5800) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU CheckMate | |
| LG Gram 15U55T (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (n=1) | |
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Geekbench AI: Single Precision GPU 1.5 | Half Precision GPU 1.5 | Quantized GPU 1.5
| Performance rating | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 -4! | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) -3! | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl -3! | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R -7! | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 Plus -8! | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) (5911 - 7308, n=5) | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) (9707 - 11221, n=5) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) (8600 - 14030, n=5) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) (6715 - 7865, n=5) | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) (1482 - 1812, n=5) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) (1438 - 1744, n=5) | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) (1583 - 1920, n=5) | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) (1331 - 1707, n=5) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) (277 - 290, n=5) | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) (232 - 274, n=5) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) (496 - 603, n=5) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Geekbench AI / Single Precision GPU 1.5 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) (3020 - 4581, n=5) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Geekbench AI / Half Precision GPU 1.5 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) (5710 - 6571, n=5) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Geekbench AI / Quantized GPU 1.5 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) (2476 - 4429, n=5) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 7218 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (21887 - 87149, n=5) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (19699 - 66912, n=5) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (17473 - 61273, n=5) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (122.5 - 536, n=5) | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
* ... smaller is better
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
产品 ESO512GHLCJ与我们在 LG Gram Pro 16 及其三星 PM9A1a 固态硬盘上观察到的情况不同,它能提供高达 5200 MB/s 的稳定传输速率,而且不会出现节流现象。
| Drive Performance rating - Percent | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
* ... smaller is better
磁盘节流DiskSpd 读取循环,队列深度 8
图形处理器性能
4 核集成 GPU 4 核集成 GPU 与三代旧版 Iris Xe 96 EU 性能相似,但根据 3DMark 基准测试,Gram Book 15 的速度大约慢了 30%。我们测试设备的内存配置为单通道,因此强烈建议配置双通道内存,以最大限度地提高图形性能。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 5118 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 17880 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3646 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1981 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
| Performance rating - Percent | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 Plus -2! | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 -2! | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) -3! | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl -1! | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R -2! | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | |
| 1280x720 Low Preset (FSR off) | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| Average Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) (25.6 - 35, n=24) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| 1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off) | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| Average Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) (16.7 - 22.5, n=31) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset (FSR off) | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| Average Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) (13.2 - 18.3, n=31) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off) | |
| Average Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) (11.4 - 15.5, n=30) | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Average Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) (10 - 13.7, n=30) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| F1 24 | |
| 1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Average Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) (33 - 44.7, n=13) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Average Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) (30.1 - 40.1, n=13) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Average Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) (22.6 - 30, n=11) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Average Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) (6.91 - 8.51, n=7) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 65.2 | 60.1 | 19.5 | 7.92 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 77.8 | 51.3 | 51.2 | 48 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 33.9 | 19.3 | 15.1 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 34.7 | 28.7 | 25.3 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 74.1 | 31 | 27.1 | 22.9 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 16.7 | 13.4 | 11.6 | 11.3 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 18.6 | 15.3 | 12.7 | 11.3 |
| F1 24 (2024) | 35.7 | 32.8 | 24.6 | 7.11 |
排放量
系统噪音
Noise level
| Idle |
| 24.8 / 24.8 / 24.8 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 25.6 / 28.1 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: | ||
| LG Gram 15U55T Ultra 7 255U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R Core 5 210H, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs | HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Dell Inspiron 15 Plus i5-11400H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -22% | -26% | -14% | -27% | -35% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 24.8 | 25.2 -2% | 27.3 -10% | 23.6 5% | 25.3 -2% | 26 -5% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 24.8 | 25.2 -2% | 27.3 -10% | 23.6 5% | 25.3 -2% | 26 -5% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 24.8 | 25.2 -2% | 27.3 -10% | 23.6 5% | 25.3 -2% | 28 -13% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 24.8 | 25.2 -2% | 29 -17% | 23.6 5% | 25.3 -2% | 32 -29% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 25.6 | 43.1 -68% | 42 -64% | 23.7 7% | 43.5 -70% | 47 -84% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 28 | 35.1 -25% | 45.8 -64% | |||
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 28.1 | 43.3 -54% | 41.5 -48% | 45.2 -61% | 50.75 -81% | 48 -71% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (dB) | 46 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
如下面的温度图所示,底盖上的表面温度热点可能比键盘甲板上的温度高出 9 摄氏度。尽管如此,平均温度还是明显低于我们在 2023 LG Gram SuperSlim 上记录的温度。 2023 LG Gram SuperSlim.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.4 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 20.2 °C / 68 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 23.6 °C / 74.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (+5.1 °C / 9.2 F).
| LG Gram 15U55T Ultra 7 255U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R Core 5 210H, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs | HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Dell Inspiron 15 Plus i5-11400H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -44% | -15% | -10% | -63% | -50% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 35.4 | 43.9 -24% | 34.2 3% | 38 -7% | 51.5 -45% | 50 -41% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 43.4 | 50.4 -16% | 38.8 11% | 42 3% | 62.4 -44% | 51 -18% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 21 | 35.8 -70% | 28.6 -36% | 24.4 -16% | 41.7 -99% | 38 -81% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 22.6 | 37.5 -66% | 31.4 -39% | 26.8 -19% | 37.2 -65% | 36 -59% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在启动 Prime95 压力测试时,CPU 会提升至 3.4 GHz 和 42 W,片刻后达到 82 C。随后,CPU 会稳定在 1.6 GHz、76 C 和 23 W,如下图所示,这表明 Turbo Boost 的可持续性很差。
当运行游戏等高负荷负载时,核心温度会徘徊在 70 C 左右,这比我们在去年的 HP Envy x360 15 上观察到的温度要低得多。 惠普 Envy x360 15.
| CPU 平均时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | |
| 系统闲置 | -- | 500 - 800 | 40 |
| Prime95 压力 | 1.6 | -- | 76 |
| Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 1.0 | 1900 | 69 |
| 赛博朋克 2077 压力 | 0.5 | 1700 - 2100 | 69 |
LG Gram 15U55T audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
| Off / Standby | |
| Idle | |
| Load |
|
Key:
min: | |
| LG Gram 15U55T Ultra 7 255U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake), , IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R Core 5 210H, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN, IPS, 1920x1200, 15.3" | HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake), Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, OLED, 2880x1620, 15.6" | Dell Inspiron 15 Plus i5-11400H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -9% | -28% | -12% | -55% | -104% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 4 | 4.2 -5% | 6.7 -68% | 3.4 15% | 5.73 -43% | 9 -125% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 8.3 | 8.9 -7% | 10.1 -22% | 8.1 2% | 14.5 -75% | 11 -33% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 8.5 | 10.3 -21% | 10.2 -20% | 9.6 -13% | 15.6 -84% | 15 -76% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 37.9 | 47 -24% | 52.6 -39% | 43.2 -14% | 40.5 -7% | 97 -156% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 32.4 | 36.9 -14% | 42.1 -30% | |||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 36.3 | 40.2 -11% | 46.3 -28% | |||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 56.7 | 49 14% | 69.5 -23% | 64.5 -14% | 94 -66% | 129 -128% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (Watt) | 43.8 | 74.9 | 100.1 |
* ... smaller is better
功耗 赛博朋克/压力测试
外部显示器功耗
电池寿命
尽管电池容量相对较小,只有 51 瓦时,但 WLAN 浏览的运行时间却可观,不到 10 小时。
| LG Gram 15U55T Ultra 7 255U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake), 51 Wh | LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R Core 5 210H, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, 60 Wh | HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake), 55 Wh | Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 75 Wh | Dell Inspiron 15 Plus i5-11400H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 56 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | 25% | 70% | -28% | -15% | -41% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 10 | 12.5 25% | 17 70% | 7.2 -28% | 8.5 -15% | 5.9 -41% |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 27.5 | 8.8 | ||||
| H.264 (h) | 14.7 | 9 | ||||
| Load (h) | 3.2 | 3.5 | 1.2 |
笔记本检查评级
即使与华硕或联想的替代产品相比,Gram Book 15 的预算价位也没有足够吸引人的功能。
LG Gram 15U55T
- 02/27/2026 v8
Allen Ngo
潜在竞争对手比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LG Gram 15U55T Intel Core Ultra 7 255U ⎘ Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) ⎘ 16 GB Memory | List Price: 800 USD | 1.6 kg | 19.3 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P ⎘ Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 2099 Euro | 990 g | 10.9 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI OLED | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R Intel Core 5 210H ⎘ Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 770 USD | 1.7 kg | 18.9 mm | 15.30" 1920x1200 148 PPI IPS | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl Intel Core Ultra 7 155U ⎘ Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $96.29 LCDOLED Replacement for HP E... 2. $99.00 Replacement for HP Envy X360... 3. $617.99 HP 15-fe1071cl Envy x360 15.... List Price: 1050 USD | 1.9 kg | 18.3 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H ⎘ Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $55.99 Smatree MS79T Hard EVA Prote... 2. $15.99 Nicpower Laptop Charger Comp... 3. $751.00 ASUS Vivobook S 15 S5506MA L... List Price: 1499 Euro | 1.6 kg | 19 mm | 15.60" 2880x1620 OLED | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 Plus Intel Core i5-11400H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $277.00 Dell Inspiron 15 Plus 7501 L... 2. $599.00 Dell Inspiron 15 Touchscreen... 3. $465.00 DELL 13th Generation Busines... List Price: 849 EUR | 1.9 kg | 19 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.













































































