Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
MagyarSchenker XMG Apex 15 in 游戏笔记本电脑回顾。这次采用了笔记本电脑的CPU，但仍采用了台式机的冷却系统
去年，不寻常的Apex系列开始使用插座式AMD处理器，也就是台式机CPU!而今年的Apex则使用了AMD的笔记本CPU。
尽管采用了焊接的CPU，今年的Apex在一些方面与竞争对手有所不同。例如，电池是可拆卸的--我们只能对此表示欢迎，因为曾几何时，这种延长寿命的方法是标准配置
当然，Apex在Bestware公司又是可以广泛配置的。RTX 3070或RTX 3060，Ryzen 7 5800H或Ryzen 9 5900HX，以及内存和大容量存储可以自由选择。只有屏幕似乎被限制为全高清。
我们的竞争对手包括联想Legion 5 15 G6、华硕TUF Gaming F15、Alienware M15 R5和惠普Victus 16，尽管屏幕在16英寸时略大。我们也用前辈来做比较。
XMG Apex 15 (XMG Apex Series)
Processor
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H 8 x 3.2 - 4.4 GHz, 48 W PL2 / Short Burst, 37.5 W PL1 / Sustained, Cezanne H (Zen 3)
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU - 6144 MB, 130 W TDP ( including 15 W Dynamic Boost), + AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, Geforce 472.12, NVIDIA Optimus
Memory
16384 MB
, 2x DDR4 SO-DIMM, Dual Channel
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LG Philips LGD0625 (LP156WFG-SPB3), IPS, glossy: no, 144 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW), 500 GB
, 450 GB free
Weight
2.133 kg, Power Supply: 820 g
Price
1506 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Possible competitors in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 84.4 % | 11/2021 | Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 29 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 81.2 % | Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 R9 3900, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | 2.7 kg | 32.5 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | ||
| 83.4 % | 09/2021 | Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 26 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 85.9 % | 10/2021 | Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 24.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 84.7 % | Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 22.85 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | ||
| 84.3 % | 10/2021 | HP Victus 16-e0179ng R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 23.5 mm | 16.10" | 1920x1080 |
外壳 - 仅在盖子上有金属
与前代产品相比，该机箱略有变化，因此现在左侧有一个额外的风扇出口，而且端口也有变化。然而，材料保持不变：盖子是金属，底座是塑料。因此，盖子相对稳定，但当然还是可以翘起来，IPS面板令人惊讶地接受了这一点，即没有大的颜色变化或屏幕渗漏。底座看起来非常稳定，几乎不可能被弯曲，吱吱嘎嘎的声音几乎不存在。
设计是相当克制的，尽管一些倾斜的线条和两个小的、看起来多余的黑色镶嵌物装饰着盖子，盖子也是黑色的。底部主要由风扇栅栏组成。由于是软塑料，这些窄条看起来不是很结实，而且可以快速压入，与底座不同。缝隙并不明显。
Apex并没有通过瘦身；那些经常与超极本或薄型游戏笔记本打交道的人可能会对其厚度感到惊讶。至少它比上一代产品薄了3毫米（约0.12英寸），但其他竞争对手仍然更薄。
然而，新Apex是比较中最轻的设备，只有2.1公斤（约4.6磅）。其他尺寸相当小；华硕TUF的尺寸差不多，而其他设备往往要大一些。
设备 - 3台外部显示器和USB 2.0
不幸的是，申克公司省略了（微型）SD卡读卡器。电源端口现在从后面移到了左边，而LAN端口移到了后面。由于AMD的CPU，Thunderbolt不幸缺席，但USB-C端口支持Displayport 1.4，所以你可以通过额外的专用迷你Displayport和HDMI端口同时连接三个外部显示器。所有三个显示器端口都直接连接到RTX GPU，所以VR和G-Sync也得到了原生支持。
我们发现左边的两个USB-A端口有些不利。 这两个紧挨着，看起来一模一样。然而，根据规格表，一个是3.2 Gen 1型（准3.0），另一个是3.2 Gen 2x1型，所以理论上是两倍的速度。作为一个用户，你自然希望一眼就能看出哪个端口对你的USB存储介质来说是最快的，但在这里你必须事先测试端口并记住它们。
旧时代的遗迹。在右侧仍有一个USB A 2.0端口，将来可以升级。另一方面，用于耳机/耳麦和麦克风的两个音频端口是积极的。
沟通
Schenker依靠英特尔的Wi-Fi 6 AX200以及蓝牙5进行无线通信。传输速率大致符合预期水平，因此Apex在整体上处于中游水平。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12 | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Average of class Gaming (450 - 1622, n=166, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (447 - 1645, n=127) | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
| iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12 | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Average of class Gaming (90 - 1743, n=166, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (523 - 1684, n=128) | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
| HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø898 (835-956)
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø828 (634-900)
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1041 (531-1102)
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø550 (310-825)
网络摄像头
我们在这里处理的是一个标准的高清网络摄像头，它只能满足视频通话的最低质量要求。至少颜色偏差出乎意料地低，但图片被洗掉了，而且充满了大量的噪音。
12.7 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
19 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
22 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
13 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
24.3 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
22 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
13 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
13 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
13 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
0.7 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
2 ∆E
1.3 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
1.4 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
5 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
安全问题
除了读卡器，前代产品的指纹传感器也被省略了，这一点我们可以接受。当然，TPM 2.0也在船上，还有一个Kensington端口。
辅料
Schenker在盒子里装了一个大的、绿黑色的XMG鼠标垫，这让其游戏玩家客户很高兴。还有一张驱动光盘和值得称赞的Schenker典型的驱动U盘。最后但并非最不重要的是，购买者会得到一份关于按键最重要的特殊功能的快速指南。
维护
需要卸下整整16颗螺丝（其中四颗在电池舱，只有一颗是不同大小的）。首先，必须卸下电池。
一旦所有的十字螺丝被卸下，你必须压住电池舱的内部，将底板从坚固的固定夹中释放出来。然后你就可以接触到风扇、内存插槽、Wi-Fi模块和SSD。此外，还有一个特殊的功能，即一个几乎不使用的2.5英寸插槽，用于旧的存储驱动器。
担保
德铁信可提供24个月的基本保证。这包括在头六个月内的取货和退货快速维修。
保修期可以有偿延长。
输入设备 - 小键
键盘
由于有了数字键盘，布局看起来很紧凑但很整齐。键本身相当小，不到1.5厘米。包括Esc在内的F键行甚至更小，因此也是边缘地带，（《暗黑破坏神2：复活》用它会很费劲），但通过Home、End等纠正输入位置也很困难。
你还必须仔细观察一下方向键。它们在空间上并不是分开的，而是嵌在其他各种按键之间。背光提供了各种颜色，但只能统一照亮键盘，不能照亮每个区域或键。
打字时，这些小键一开始给人的印象有些奇怪。然而，键程绝不是太平，反馈也很清晰。咔哒声也不太响亮。打字时，表面会有轻微的弯曲，但这并不是一个真正的问题。
触摸板
触摸板足够大（约10.9 x 6.2厘米，或约4.3 x 2.4英寸），现在提供了相当好的滑行性能。它只有在非常缓慢的移动中才会有一点动摇。
专用的鼠标按钮工作可靠，但其响亮的点击声并不是太高质量。
显示屏 - 明亮，但对比度很一般
申克公司在微星GP65中安装了LG飞利浦的144赫兹的哑光全高清IPS面板。没有4K选项。
该面板的平均亮度约为350尼特，因此是比较中最亮的显示器。然而，83%的亮度分布是需要优化的；它特别是在右侧向底部减少。
响应时间还不错，但并不突出；PWM没有用于亮度控制。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
LG Philips LGD0625 (LP156WFG-SPB3)
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 393 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 353.3 cd/m² Minimum: 19 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 395 cd/m²
Contrast: 836:1 (Black: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.84 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4, calibrated: 0.67
ΔE Greyscale 3.73 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
65.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.53
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS LG Philips LGD0625 (LP156WFG-SPB3), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 AU Optronics B156HAN (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL B156HAN12.H, , 1920x1080, 15.60 | Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM Chi Mei N156HRA-EA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition B156HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | HP Victus 16-e0179ng BOE09BE, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 0% | 1% | -34% | 10% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage | 64.5 | 67.3 4% | 65.4 1% | 41.9 -35% | 72.6 13% | |
| sRGB Coverage | 95.9 | 91.3 -5% | 96.3 0% | 62.9 -34% | 100 4% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.8 | 66.8 2% | 67.5 3% | 43.3 -34% | 73.5 12% | |
| Response Times | -7% | 15% | -88% | 51% | 6% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 15 | 17.6 ? -17% | 13.6 ? 9% | 28.4 ? -89% | 4 ? 73% | 9.6 ? 36% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 11.6 | 11.2 ? 3% | 9.2 ? 21% | 21.6 ? -86% | 8.4 ? 28% | 14.4 ? -24% |
| PWM Frequency | ||||||
| Screen | -25% | -18% | -73% | -0% | -1% | |
| Brightness middle | 393 | 317 -19% | 350 -11% | 268.3 -32% | 329 -16% | 361 -8% |
| Brightness | 353 | 316 -10% | 350 -1% | 257 -27% | 321 -9% | 341 -3% |
| Brightness Distribution | 83 | 84 1% | 96 16% | 84 1% | 92 11% | 88 6% |
| Black Level * | 0.47 | 0.28 40% | 0.3 36% | 0.34 28% | 0.27 43% | 0.3 36% |
| Contrast | 836 | 1132 35% | 1167 40% | 789 -6% | 1219 46% | 1203 44% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.84 | 3.52 -24% | 3.9 -37% | 5.05 -78% | 2.78 2% | 2.44 14% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.15 | 6.93 3% | 8.2 -15% | 15.43 -116% | 4.88 32% | 6.37 11% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.67 | 2.49 -272% | 1.6 -139% | 3.21 -379% | 1.63 -143% | 1.26 -88% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.73 | 2.81 25% | 5.5 -47% | 5.5 -47% | 2.5 33% | 4.6 -23% |
| Gamma | 2.53 87% | 2.54 87% | 2.15 102% | 2.35 94% | 2.106 104% | 2.268 97% |
| CCT | 7312 89% | 6877 95% | 7414 88% | 7392 88% | 6201 105% | 6609 98% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 67 | 76 | ||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 91 | 99 | ||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -11% /
-17% | -1% /
-9% | -65% /
-67% | 26% /
9% | 5% /
2% |
* ... smaller is better
黑色水平和对比度比竞争对手略差，但是显示器可以被很好地校准，所以颜色偏差只是非常小。
申克公司谈到了90%的sRGB覆盖率，我们甚至测量到了96%左右。Adobe RGB色彩空间的覆盖率仍为66%左右。速率是平均的，华硕要差得多，惠普Victus和Alienware稍好。
在户外，哑光显示消除了大多数反射，350尼特的亮度至少在阴凉处确保了良好的可视性。在阴凉处和阳光下都应避免斜视角度。
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 11.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ ms rise |  |
| ↘ ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.4 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 15 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ ms rise |  |
| ↘ ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21941 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
视角的稳定性很好，这也是IPS的典型特征。亮度和对比度只有在极端的视角下才会有一点下降。
业绩 - 完全达到目标
凭借其8核处理器，AMD Ryzen 7 5800H，以及 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060笔记本GPUApex 15加入了中高级游戏玩家的行列。Apex还可选择配备上层RTX 3070 GPU，但我们的测试模型应该仍然能够在原生分辨率下流畅地渲染几乎所有现代游戏。由于RTX 3060消耗的能量相对较少，产生的废热也比其更强大的姐妹机型少，Apex也适合作为工作设备或多媒体站。
所有的性能设置都可以在Apex的控制中心找到。申克公司还建议在更高的负载下使用娱乐模式，因为根据制造商的说法，在性能模式下，性能仅有最小的增加，但风扇的声音会明显变大。然而，游戏笔记本电脑是为最大性能而设计的，我们在性能模式下运行所有的基准测试，以进行更好的比较。因此，我们将在文中部分讨论这两种模式之间的差异。
处理器
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H有八个核心，理论上时钟频率为3.2至4.4GHz。它还集成了一个Radeon RX Vega 8作为GPU。TDP在性能模式下比娱乐模式下略高。
在我们的Cinebench循环中，Apex 15的一贯表现使其完全处于稍快的联想Legion 和稍慢的Alienware M15之间，它们都采用相同的CPU。在运行过程中，Apex最初达到了约62W的TDP，然后下降到约54W。在开始新的运行时，它再次达到60-62W。
在所有Cinebench测试中，我们的Apex与稍快的Legion 和华硕TUF Gaming大致持平。然而，其他笔记本电脑无法与台式机处理器AMD Ryzen 9 3900的多线程性能竞争。的前辈。作为回报，"老 "插座CPU的单线程性能明显比现在的Apex差。
在电池模式下，在新的Cinebench R15多线程运行中，约有44%的性能损失。
Cinebench R15 Multi Endurance test
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø2073 (2055.92-2084.96)
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø2123 (2107.59-2141.44)
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø1977 (1921.88-2004.51)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | 64 Bit Single-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | 64 Bit Single-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 -2! | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM -2! | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Cinebench R23 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Average of class Gaming (4032 - 19282, n=156, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (8812 - 13214, n=24) | |
| HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
| Cinebench R23 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
| Average of class Gaming (778 - 1920, n=155, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (1294 - 1441, n=24) | |
| HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (3430 - 5020, n=26) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1397 - 7382, n=228, last 2 years) | |
| HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (502 - 560, n=25) | |
| Average of class Gaming (300 - 740, n=228, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (1487 - 2119, n=23) | |
| HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (536 - 2944, n=239, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (209 - 234, n=24) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
| Average of class Gaming (108 - 277, n=229, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 | |
| Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU | |
| Average of class Gaming (168 - 732, n=227, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (237 - 340, n=24) | |
| HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (51114 - 59986, n=24) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
| Average of class Gaming (21148 - 76063, n=227, last 2 years) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (5038 - 5632, n=24) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
| Average of class Gaming (2743 - 6506, n=227, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 | |
| Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Average of class Gaming (2783 - 14294, n=220, last 2 years) | |
| HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (7326 - 9062, n=23) | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
| Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (1336 - 1505, n=23) | |
| HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (703 - 1933, n=220, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (11.6 - 16.1, n=24) | |
| Average of class Gaming (4.67 - 22, n=226, last 2 years) | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (47.4 - 113, n=24) | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Average of class Gaming (23.9 - 113, n=224, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
| Average of class Gaming (0.412 - 1.088, n=223, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (0.511 - 0.559, n=23) | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (10349 - 15169, n=24) | |
| Average of class Gaming (2585 - 19199, n=181, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (63663 - 95954, n=24) | |
| Average of class Gaming (12439 - 110797, n=181, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (2096 - 3287, n=24) | |
| Average of class Gaming (833 - 4851, n=181, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (92948 - 99215, n=24) | |
| Average of class Gaming (30447 - 132615, n=181, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (9962 - 11871, n=24) | |
| Average of class Gaming (3007 - 17639, n=181, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (36083 - 52732, n=24) | |
| Average of class Gaming (7135 - 61370, n=181, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (50226 - 127832, n=24) | |
| Average of class Gaming (11368 - 156370, n=181, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (591 - 828, n=24) | |
| Average of class Gaming (305 - 1209, n=202, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (5457 - 7884, n=24) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1437 - 10472, n=181, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Average of class Gaming (8341 - 46643, n=181, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (14445 - 25421, n=24) | |
系统性能
在PCMark 10中，所有的对比设备都很接近。引人注目的是，"老 "Apex往往仍然占据着第一的位置。
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (6465 - 6855, n=6) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
| HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Average of class Gaming (4077 - 8186, n=192, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (9589 - 10414, n=6) | |
| HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Average of class Gaming (7148 - 11205, n=191, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (8798 - 9728, n=6) | |
| HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Average of class Gaming (6161 - 10638, n=191, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (7884 - 9497, n=6) | |
| HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (3670 - 13098, n=191, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 6703 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 | |
| Average of class Gaming (18074 - 77803, n=181, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (34964 - 44180, n=24) | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Average of class Gaming (20318 - 76185, n=181, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (39990 - 47260, n=24) | |
| HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Average of class Gaming (15975 - 66256, n=181, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (28456 - 47022, n=24) | |
| HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (76.3 - 105.1, n=24) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Average of class Gaming (68.8 - 122, n=203, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
打开多个浏览器标签和播放我们的4K/60-fps YouTube视频都没有给Apex带来任何问题。但在关闭浏览器时，突然出现了延迟，这是一个相当不寻常的现象，可能还是与新Windows 11下的驱动问题有关。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储
Schenker在Apex上安装了一块512GB的三星SSD 980。这块SSD几乎没有辜负三星SSD的良好声誉。在我们所有的测试中，只有Alienware的表现更差；其余的竞争产品通常都比较好，老的Apex甚至明显好一些。
机箱中还有一个M.2插槽，用户还可以选择安装一个2.5英寸驱动器。
| Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 | |
| HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Average Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW) | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
3138 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
2242 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
490 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
553 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
1970 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
1984 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
57.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
146.2 MB/s
Continuous Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
: Ø2984 (2805.94-2994.62)
图形性能
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H仍然有一个集成的Radeon RX Vega 8，但NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060笔记本GPU，更适合于要求高的任务。另外，你也可以购买配备RTX 3070的Apex。根据不同的性能配置，GPU会调出不同的性能。RTX 3060在娱乐和性能配置文件中的速度理论上是一样的，但它在安静和省电模式下缺乏15W的动态提升。
Apex通常在合成3DMark测试中占据榜首，而联想的Legion 是它在性能方面最激烈的竞争者。然而，老款Apex仅比其官方继任者的RTX 2070落后几个百分点。在所有测试中，目前的型号比我们数据库中所有配备RTX 3060的笔记本电脑的计算平均值好8%左右。
然而，大部分的GPU性能在电池模式下丢失。我们在3DMark 11中测得的降幅为67%。
| 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
| Average of class Gaming (1925 - 45050, n=211, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (13799 - 30772, n=25) | |
| HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
| Average of class Gaming (23059 - 192950, n=176, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (33126 - 136275, n=24) | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
| Average of class Gaming (1360 - 34993, n=230, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (16956 - 23109, n=31) | |
| HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
| Average of class Gaming (429 - 13455, n=232, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | |