Notebookcheck Logo

Schenker XMG Apex 15 in 游戏笔记本电脑回顾。这次采用了笔记本电脑的CPU,但仍采用了台式机的冷却系统

桌面CPU在哪里? 前代产品配备了用于台式机的可插拔插座CPU,在性能方面与竞争对手擦肩而过,但显然声音太大。目前的Apex 15使用普通的笔记本CPU,但仍然保留了前代产品的一些功能。这有优点也有缺点,但哪些优点超过了其他优点?
AMD Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Zen 3 (Vermeer)

去年,不寻常的Apex系列开始使用插座式AMD处理器,也就是台式机CPU!而今年的Apex则使用了AMD的笔记本CPU。

尽管采用了焊接的CPU,今年的Apex在一些方面与竞争对手有所不同。例如,电池是可拆卸的--我们只能对此表示欢迎,因为曾几何时,这种延长寿命的方法是标准配置

当然,Apex在Bestware公司又是可以广泛配置的。RTX 3070或RTX 3060,Ryzen 7 5800H或Ryzen 9 5900HX,以及内存和大容量存储可以自由选择。只有屏幕似乎被限制为全高清。

我们的竞争对手包括联想Legion 5 15 G6、华硕TUF Gaming F15、Alienware M15 R5和惠普Victus 16,尽管屏幕在16英寸时略大。我们也用前辈来做比较。

XMG Apex 15 (XMG Apex Series)
Processor
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H 8 x 3.2 - 4.4 GHz, 48 W PL2 / Short Burst, 37.5 W PL1 / Sustained, Cezanne-H (Zen 3)
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU - 6 GB VRAM, 130 W TDP ( including 15 W Dynamic Boost), + AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, Geforce 472.12, NVIDIA Optimus
Memory
16 GB 
, 2x DDR4 SO-DIMM, Dual Channel
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LG Philips LGD0625 (LP156WFG-SPB3), IPS, glossy: no, 144 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW), 500 GB 
, 450 GB free
Soundcard
AMD Raven/Renoir/Van Gogh/Cezanne/Rembrandt/Raphael - HD Audio Controller
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: Headset, Microphone
Networking
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth Bluetooth 5
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 29 x 361 x 258
Battery
49 Wh Lithium-Polymer, removeable, FlexiCharger in BIOS, Battery is removable
Camera
Webcam: HD Webcam
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo Speaker, Keyboard: RGB Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months Warranty, 24 Monate Basis-Garantie | Pickup & Return Schnellreparatur innerhalb der ersten 6 Monate
Weight
2.133 kg, Power Supply: 820 g
Price
1506 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
84.4 %
11/2021
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.1 kg29 mm15.60"1920x1080
81.2 %
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
R9 3900, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
2.7 kg32.5 mm15.60"1920x1080
83.4 %
09/2021
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg26 mm15.60"1920x1080
85.9 %
10/2021
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg24.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
84.7 %
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg22.85 mm15.60"1920x1080
84.3 %
10/2021
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg23.5 mm16.10"1920x1080

外壳 - 仅在盖子上有金属

与前代产品相比,该机箱略有变化,因此现在左侧有一个额外的风扇出口,而且端口也有变化。然而,材料保持不变:盖子是金属,底座是塑料。因此,盖子相对稳定,但当然还是可以翘起来,IPS面板令人惊讶地接受了这一点,即没有大的颜色变化或屏幕渗漏。底座看起来非常稳定,几乎不可能被弯曲,吱吱嘎嘎的声音几乎不存在。

设计是相当克制的,尽管一些倾斜的线条和两个小的、看起来多余的黑色镶嵌物装饰着盖子,盖子也是黑色的。底部主要由风扇栅栏组成。由于是软塑料,这些窄条看起来不是很结实,而且可以快速压入,与底座不同。缝隙并不明显。

Apex并没有通过瘦身;那些经常与超极本或薄型游戏笔记本打交道的人可能会对其厚度感到惊讶。至少它比上一代产品薄了3毫米(约0.12英寸),但其他竞争对手仍然更薄。

然而,新Apex是比较中最轻的设备,只有2.1公斤(约4.6磅)。其他尺寸相当小;华硕TUF的尺寸差不多,而其他设备往往要大一些。

Size comparison

361 mm 258 mm 32.5 mm 2.7 kg370 mm 260 mm 23.5 mm 2.5 kg361 mm 258 mm 29 mm 2.1 kg363 mm 261 mm 26 mm 2.5 kg359 mm 256 mm 24.9 mm 2.3 kg356.2 mm 272.5 mm 22.85 mm 2.5 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

设备 - 3台外部显示器和USB 2.0

不幸的是,申克公司省略了(微型)SD卡读卡器。电源端口现在从后面移到了左边,而LAN端口移到了后面。由于AMD的CPU,Thunderbolt不幸缺席,但USB-C端口支持Displayport 1.4,所以你可以通过额外的专用迷你Displayport和HDMI端口同时连接三个外部显示器。所有三个显示器端口都直接连接到RTX GPU,所以VR和G-Sync也得到了原生支持。

我们发现左边的两个USB-A端口有些不利。 这两个紧挨着,看起来一模一样。然而,根据规格表,一个是3.2 Gen 1型(准3.0),另一个是3.2 Gen 2x1型,所以理论上是两倍的速度。作为一个用户,你自然希望一眼就能看出哪个端口对你的USB存储介质来说是最快的,但在这里你必须事先测试端口并记住它们。

旧时代的遗迹。在右侧仍有一个USB A 2.0端口,将来可以升级。另一方面,用于耳机/耳麦和麦克风的两个音频端口是积极的。

左边:Kensington、电源、USB-A 3.0、USB-A 3.2
左边:Kensington、电源、USB-A 3.0、USB-A 3.2
右边。麦克风、耳机、USB-A 2.0
右边。麦克风、耳机、USB-A 2.0
后方。迷你显示端口,HDMI,LAN,带显示端口的USB-C
后方。迷你显示端口,HDMI,LAN,带显示端口的USB-C

沟通

Schenker依靠英特尔的Wi-Fi 6 AX200以及蓝牙5进行无线通信。传输速率大致符合预期水平,因此Apex在整体上处于中游水平。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1400 MBit/s +29%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1371 (925min - 1499max) MBit/s +26%
Average of class Gaming
  (885 - 1412, n=5, last 2 years)
1135 MBit/s +5%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
  (447 - 1645, n=127)
1104 MBit/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1084 (531min - 1102max) MBit/s
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
928 (483min - 1003max) MBit/s -14%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
MediaTek MT7921
787 (675min - 851max) MBit/s -27%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
561 (310min - 825max) MBit/s -48%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Gaming
  (881 - 1700, n=5, last 2 years)
1369 MBit/s +38%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1330 MBit/s +34%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1330 (711min - 1563max) MBit/s +34%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
  (523 - 1684, n=128)
1191 MBit/s +20%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
992 (835min - 956max) MBit/s
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
MediaTek MT7921
878 (827min - 896max) MBit/s -11%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
828 (634min - 900max) MBit/s -17%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
732 (376min - 763max) MBit/s -26%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø898 (835-956)
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø828 (634-900)
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1041 (531-1102)
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø550 (310-825)

网络摄像头

我们在这里处理的是一个标准的高清网络摄像头,它只能满足视频通话的最低质量要求。至少颜色偏差出乎意料地低,但图片被洗掉了,而且充满了大量的噪音。

ColorChecker
12.7 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
19 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
22 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
13 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
24.3 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
22 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
13 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM: 14.68 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 24.34 ∆E
ColorChecker
14.3 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
13 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
13 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
0.7 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
2 ∆E
1.3 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL: 7.91 ∆E min: 0.69 - max: 14.34 ∆E
ColorChecker
2.2 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
1.4 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
5 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
ColorChecker SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS: 4.44 ∆E min: 1.19 - max: 8.81 ∆E

安全问题

除了读卡器,前代产品的指纹传感器也被省略了,这一点我们可以接受。当然,TPM 2.0也在船上,还有一个Kensington端口。

辅料

Schenker在盒子里装了一个大的、绿黑色的XMG鼠标垫,这让其游戏玩家客户很高兴。还有一张驱动光盘和值得称赞的Schenker典型的驱动U盘。最后但并非最不重要的是,购买者会得到一份关于按键最重要的特殊功能的快速指南。

维护

一个电池盒的螺丝偏离了
一个电池盒的螺丝偏离了

需要卸下整整16颗螺丝(其中四颗在电池舱,只有一颗是不同大小的)。首先,必须卸下电池。

一旦所有的十字螺丝被卸下,你必须压住电池舱的内部,将底板从坚固的固定夹中释放出来。然后你就可以接触到风扇、内存插槽、Wi-Fi模块和SSD。此外,还有一个特殊的功能,即一个几乎不使用的2.5英寸插槽,用于旧的存储驱动器。

不含底板
不含底板
三星SSD+免费M.2插槽
2个占用的RAM插槽
2.5英寸槽
用于固定的简单胶条
更多特萨

担保

德铁信可提供24个月的基本保证。这包括在头六个月内的取货和退货快速维修。

保修期可以有偿延长。

输入设备 - 小键

键盘

由于有了数字键盘,布局看起来很紧凑但很整齐。键本身相当小,不到1.5厘米。包括Esc在内的F键行甚至更小,因此也是边缘地带,(《暗黑破坏神2:复活》用它会很费劲),但通过Home、End等纠正输入位置也很困难。

你还必须仔细观察一下方向键。它们在空间上并不是分开的,而是嵌在其他各种按键之间。背光提供了各种颜色,但只能统一照亮键盘,不能照亮每个区域或键。

打字时,这些小键一开始给人的印象有些奇怪。然而,键程绝不是太平,反馈也很清晰。咔哒声也不太响亮。打字时,表面会有轻微的弯曲,但这并不是一个真正的问题。

键盘
键盘
电源开关
电源开关
箭头键
箭头键

触摸板

触摸板
触摸板

触摸板足够大(约10.9 x 6.2厘米,或约4.3 x 2.4英寸),现在提供了相当好的滑行性能。它只有在非常缓慢的移动中才会有一点动摇。

专用的鼠标按钮工作可靠,但其响亮的点击声并不是太高质量。

显示屏 - 明亮,但对比度很一般

哑光、略带颗粒感的子像素
哑光、略带颗粒感的子像素

申克公司在微星GP65中安装了LG飞利浦的144赫兹的哑光全高清IPS面板。没有4K选项。

该面板的平均亮度约为350尼特,因此是比较中最亮的显示器。然而,83%的亮度分布是需要优化的;它特别是在右侧向底部减少。

响应时间还不错,但并不突出;PWM没有用于亮度控制。

沿着墙角的屏幕出血量极少
沿着墙角的屏幕出血量极少
黑色背景的屏幕灯和斜视的视角
黑色背景的屏幕灯和斜视的视角
360
cd/m²
356
cd/m²
342
cd/m²
359
cd/m²
393
cd/m²
331
cd/m²
359
cd/m²
353
cd/m²
327
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
LG Philips LGD0625 (LP156WFG-SPB3) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 393 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 353.3 cd/m² Minimum: 19 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 395 cd/m²
Contrast: 836:1 (Black: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.84 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.67
ΔE Greyscale 3.73 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
65.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.53
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
LG Philips LGD0625 (LP156WFG-SPB3), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
AU Optronics B156HAN (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
B156HAN12.H, , 1920x1080, 15.60
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Chi Mei N156HRA-EA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
B156HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
BOE09BE, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.10
Display
0%
1%
-34%
10%
Display P3 Coverage
64.5
67.3
4%
65.4
1%
41.9
-35%
72.6
13%
sRGB Coverage
95.9
91.3
-5%
96.3
0%
62.9
-34%
100
4%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
65.8
66.8
2%
67.5
3%
43.3
-34%
73.5
12%
Response Times
-7%
15%
-88%
51%
6%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
15
17.6 ?(9.2, 8.4)
-17%
13.6 ?(6.8, 6.8)
9%
28.4 ?(15.6, 12.8)
-89%
4 ?(1.2, 2.8)
73%
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
36%
Response Time Black / White *
11.6
11.2 ?(6, 5.2)
3%
9.2 ?(4.4, 4.8)
21%
21.6 ?(11.6, 10)
-86%
8.4 ?(4.4, 4)
28%
14.4 ?(8.4, 6)
-24%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-25%
-18%
-73%
-0%
-1%
Brightness middle
393
317
-19%
350
-11%
268.3
-32%
329
-16%
361
-8%
Brightness
353
316
-10%
350
-1%
257
-27%
321
-9%
341
-3%
Brightness Distribution
83
84
1%
96
16%
84
1%
92
11%
88
6%
Black Level *
0.47
0.28
40%
0.3
36%
0.34
28%
0.27
43%
0.3
36%
Contrast
836
1132
35%
1167
40%
789
-6%
1219
46%
1203
44%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.84
3.52
-24%
3.9
-37%
5.05
-78%
2.78
2%
2.44
14%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.15
6.93
3%
8.2
-15%
15.43
-116%
4.88
32%
6.37
11%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.67
2.49
-272%
1.6
-139%
3.21
-379%
1.63
-143%
1.26
-88%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.73
2.81
25%
5.5
-47%
5.5
-47%
2.5
33%
4.6
-23%
Gamma
2.53 87%
2.54 87%
2.15 102%
2.35 94%
2.106 104%
2.268 97%
CCT
7312 89%
6877 95%
7414 88%
7392 88%
6201 105%
6609 98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
67
76
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
91
99
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-11% / -17%
-1% / -9%
-65% / -67%
26% / 9%
5% / 2%

* ... smaller is better

黑色水平和对比度比竞争对手略差,但是显示器可以被很好地校准,所以颜色偏差只是非常小。

申克公司谈到了90%的sRGB覆盖率,我们甚至测量到了96%左右。Adobe RGB色彩空间的覆盖率仍为66%左右。速率是平均的,华硕要差得多,惠普Victus和Alienware稍好。

灰度
灰度
饱和度
饱和度
颜色检测器
颜色检测器
灰度标定
灰度标定
饱和度校验
饱和度校验
校准的ColorChecker
校准的ColorChecker
sRGB
sRGB
AdobeRGB
AdobeRGB

在户外,哑光显示消除了大多数反射,350尼特的亮度至少在阴凉处确保了良好的可视性。在阴凉处和阳光下都应避免斜视角度。

外面的阴凉处
外面的阴凉处
在阴凉处以斜视的角度观察
在阴凉处以斜视的角度观察

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
11.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ ms rise
↘ ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
15 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ ms rise
↘ ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17933 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

视角的稳定性很好,这也是IPS的典型特征。亮度和对比度只有在极端的视角下才会有一点下降。

业绩 - 完全达到目标

凭借其8核处理器,AMD Ryzen 7 5800H,以及 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060笔记本GPUApex 15加入了中高级游戏玩家的行列。Apex还可选择配备上层RTX 3070 GPU,但我们的测试模型应该仍然能够在原生分辨率下流畅地渲染几乎所有现代游戏。由于RTX 3060消耗的能量相对较少,产生的废热也比其更强大的姐妹机型少,Apex也适合作为工作设备或多媒体站。

所有的性能设置都可以在Apex的控制中心找到。申克公司还建议在更高的负载下使用娱乐模式,因为根据制造商的说法,在性能模式下,性能仅有最小的增加,但风扇的声音会明显变大。然而,游戏笔记本电脑是为最大性能而设计的,我们在性能模式下运行所有的基准测试,以进行更好的比较。因此,我们将在文中部分讨论这两种模式之间的差异。

处理器

AMD Ryzen 7 5800H有八个核心,理论上时钟频率为3.2至4.4GHz。它还集成了一个Radeon RX Vega 8作为GPU。TDP在性能模式下比娱乐模式下略高。

在我们的Cinebench循环中,Apex 15的一贯表现使其完全处于稍快的联想Legion 和稍慢的Alienware M15之间,它们都采用相同的CPU。在运行过程中,Apex最初达到了约62W的TDP,然后下降到约54W。在开始新的运行时,它再次达到60-62W。

在Cinebench R15循环测试中的TDP
在Cinebench R15循环测试中的TDP

在所有Cinebench测试中,我们的Apex与稍快的Legion 和华硕TUF Gaming大致持平。然而,其他笔记本电脑无法与台式机处理器AMD Ryzen 9 3900的多线程性能竞争。的前辈。作为回报,"老 "插座CPU的单线程性能明显比现在的Apex差。

在电池模式下,在新的Cinebench R15多线程运行中,约有44%的性能损失。

Cinebench R15 Multi Endurance test

01102203304405506607708809901100121013201430154016501760187019802090Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø2073 (2055.92-2084.96)
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø2123 (2107.59-2141.44)
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø1977 (1921.88-2004.51)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming
 
85.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 -2!
AMD Ryzen 9 3900
68.1 pt
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
64.1 pt
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM -2!
Intel Core i7-11800H
63.6 pt
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
61.8 pt
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
60.7 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
 
60.3 pt
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
58.7 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 34613, n=229, last 2 years)
19422 Points +53%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
13445 (12565.7min - 13444.6max) Points +6%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
13028 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
12663 Points
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
12195 Points -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (8812 - 13214, n=29)
11794 Points -7%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
10097 Points -20%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 2235, n=227, last 2 years)
1809 Points +27%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
1509 Points +6%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1430 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1427 Points
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1410 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (1294 - 1441, n=29)
1410 Points -1%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1407 Points -1%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=227, last 2 years)
7383 Points +50%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
AMD Ryzen 9 3900
6321 Points +29%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
5182 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5020 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4913 Points
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4711 Points -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (3430 - 5020, n=31)
4568 Points -7%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4172 Points -15%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=227, last 2 years)
697 Points +25%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
582 Points +4%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
559 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
558 Points
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
551 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
550 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (502 - 560, n=30)
550 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
AMD Ryzen 9 3900
490 Points -12%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=231, last 2 years)
3074 Points +47%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
AMD Ryzen 9 3900
2804 (2664.54min - 2804.07max) Points +34%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2119 Points +2%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
2095 (1963.38min - 2095.12max) Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2085 (2055.92min - 2084.96max) Points
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2005 (1921.88min - 2004.51max) Points -4%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1982 (1952.36min - 1982.46max) Points -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (1487 - 2119, n=28)
1963 Points -6%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=230, last 2 years)
268 Points +17%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
232 Points +1%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
231 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
230 Points
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
229 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (209 - 234, n=29)
228 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
225 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
AMD Ryzen 9 3900
197 Points -14%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (237 - 340, n=29)
260 Seconds * -7%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
256 Seconds * -5%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
253 Seconds * -4%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
244 Seconds *
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
239 Seconds * +2%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
235 Seconds * +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 1259, n=225, last 2 years)
201 Seconds * +18%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
AMD Ryzen 9 3900
179 Seconds * +27%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 140932, n=226, last 2 years)
76641 MIPS +31%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
AMD Ryzen 9 3900
75612 MIPS +29%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
58467 MIPS
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
56716 MIPS -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (45773 - 59986, n=28)
54117 MIPS -7%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
53902 MIPS -8%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
53239 MIPS -9%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
51046 MIPS -13%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 7581, n=226, last 2 years)
6113 MIPS +9%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
5659 MIPS +1%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5591 MIPS 0%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5590 MIPS
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5575 MIPS 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (5038 - 5632, n=29)
5472 MIPS -2%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5448 MIPS -3%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
AMD Ryzen 9 3900
5134 MIPS -8%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 22200, n=231, last 2 years)
13504 Points +61%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
AMD Ryzen 9 3900
10190 Points +21%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
8389 Points
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7899 Points -6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (6551 - 9062, n=28)
7793 Points -7%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7522 Points -10%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7508 Points -11%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 2193, n=231, last 2 years)
1805 Points +20%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1501 Points
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1481 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1462 Points -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (1336 - 1505, n=28)
1450 Points -3%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1436 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
AMD Ryzen 9 3900
1246 Points -17%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 37.6, n=229, last 2 years)
21.1 fps +35%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
AMD Ryzen 9 3900
18.9 fps +21%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
15.6 fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
15.6 fps
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
15.1 fps -3%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
15 fps -4%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
14.7 fps -6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (11.6 - 16.1, n=29)
14.5 fps -7%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
113 s * -111%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (47.4 - 113, n=29)
64.3 s * -20%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
AMD Ryzen 9 3900
59.4 s * -11%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
57.4 s * -7%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
56.4 s * -5%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
53.5 s *
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 332, n=223, last 2 years)
49.3 s * +8%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
44.5 s * +17%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.556 sec * -9%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
AMD Ryzen 9 3900
0.546 sec * -7%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.539 sec * -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (0.511 - 0.559, n=28)
0.525 sec * -3%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.524 sec * -2%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.518 sec * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.512 sec *
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 4.47, n=226, last 2 years)
0.4706 sec * +8%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2085 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
160 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
230 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming
 
97.5 pt
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
84.1 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
 
79 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (3069 - 60169, n=222, last 2 years)
18514 KRay/s +26%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
14725 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (10349 - 15169, n=29)
13933 KRay/s -5%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
94497 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (18567 - 252486, n=222, last 2 years)
93043 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (63663 - 95954, n=29)
87478 Points -7%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Gaming
  (629 - 10389, n=222, last 2 years)
4297 MB/s +33%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
3230 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (2096 - 3287, n=29)
2979 MB/s -8%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming
  (15371 - 200651, n=222, last 2 years)
108858 Points +12%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
97488 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (91846 - 99215, n=29)
95793 Points -2%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Gaming
  (2137 - 32988, n=222, last 2 years)
12143 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
11821 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (9962 - 11871, n=29)
11517 Points -3%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
52072 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (36083 - 52732, n=29)
48035 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (10291 - 134044, n=222, last 2 years)
47650 Points -8%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
125127 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (50226 - 127832, n=29)
114346 MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=222, last 2 years)
106724 MB/s -15%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Gaming
  (150.9 - 2409, n=222, last 2 years)
1202 MB/s +50%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
803 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (591 - 828, n=29)
768 MB/s -4%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (1518 - 31796, n=222, last 2 years)
10025 KRay/s +28%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
7826 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (5457 - 7884, n=29)
7343 KRay/s -6%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=223, last 2 years)
36547 MPixel/s +84%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
19901 MPixel/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (14445 - 25421, n=29)
17883 MPixel/s -10%

系统性能

PCMark 10
PCMark 10

在PCMark 10中,所有的对比设备都很接近。引人注目的是,"老 "Apex往往仍然占据着第一的位置。

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=197, last 2 years)
7573 Points +13%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, R9 3900, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
6883 Points +3%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
6865 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
6703 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (6465 - 6855, n=6)
6651 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
6648 Points -1%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
6567 Points -2%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
6465 Points -4%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average of class Gaming
  (8300 - 12334, n=196, last 2 years)
10708 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, R9 3900, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
10535 Points +6%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
10522 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
10396 Points +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (9589 - 10414, n=6)
10019 Points +1%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
9943 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
9905 Points
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
9589 Points -3%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
9728 Points +11%
Average of class Gaming
  (7244 - 11833, n=196, last 2 years)
9727 Points +11%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (8798 - 9728, n=6)
9015 Points +2%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
8923 Points +1%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
8913 Points +1%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
8859 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
8798 Points
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, R9 3900, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
8269 Points -6%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming
  (6462 - 18475, n=196, last 2 years)
11407 Points +22%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, R9 3900, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
10157 Points +8%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9423 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
9377 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (7884 - 9497, n=6)
8860 Points -6%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
8660 Points -8%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
8582 Points -8%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
7884 Points -16%
PCMark 10 Score
6703 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 92565, n=222, last 2 years)
59056 MB/s +41%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
AMD Ryzen 9 3900, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
48159 MB/s +15%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
41788 MB/s
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
41178 MB/s -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (34964 - 44180, n=29)
39512 MB/s -5%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
37687 MB/s -10%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
36925 MB/s -12%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average of class Gaming
  (24879 - 90647, n=222, last 2 years)
62916 MB/s +33%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
AMD Ryzen 9 3900, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
48715 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
47260 MB/s
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
44676 MB/s -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (39548 - 47260, n=29)
44498 MB/s -6%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
44146 MB/s -7%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
42436 MB/s -10%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Gaming
  (21619 - 103259, n=222, last 2 years)
61374 MB/s +38%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
AMD Ryzen 9 3900, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
46513 MB/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
44339 MB/s
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
38041 MB/s -14%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (28456 - 47022, n=29)
37769 MB/s -15%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
35891 MB/s -19%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
32860 MB/s -26%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 152.5, n=219, last 2 years)
87.2 ns * -12%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
83.3 ns * -7%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (76.3 - 105.1, n=29)
83.3 ns * -7%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
81.1 ns * -4%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
AMD Ryzen 9 3900, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
78.6 ns * -1%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
78.2 ns * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
77.8 ns *
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
0 ns * +100%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

打开多个浏览器标签和播放我们的4K/60-fps YouTube视频都没有给Apex带来任何问题。但在关闭浏览器时,突然出现了延迟,这是一个相当不寻常的现象,可能还是与新Windows 11下的驱动问题有关。

4K/60帧。0个丢帧
4K/60帧。0个丢帧
LatencyMon主页
LatencyMon主页
LatencyMon 驱动程序
LatencyMon 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1431 μs * -8%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
1330 μs *
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
1161 μs * +13%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, R9 3900, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
914 μs * +31%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
703 μs * +47%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
428.6 μs * +68%

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储

Schenker在Apex上安装了一块512GB的三星SSD 980。这块SSD几乎没有辜负三星SSD的良好声誉。在我们所有的测试中,只有Alienware的表现更差;其余的竞争产品通常都比较好,老的Apex甚至明显好一些。

机箱中还有一个M.2插槽,用户还可以选择安装一个2.5英寸驱动器。

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
95.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
82.4 pt
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
70.5 pt
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
63 pt
Average Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
 
61.9 pt
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
59.1 pt
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
54.2 pt
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
39.9 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Average of class Gaming
  (1291 - 7045, n=196, last 2 years)
3528 MB/s +91%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
2894 (2885.47min - 2893.57max) MB/s +57%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
2207 (2052.27min - 2206.83max) MB/s +20%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2178 (2156.08min - 2177.89max) MB/s +18%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
1843 (1829.35min - 1842.98max) MB/s
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
1749 (1705.4min - 1749.02max) MB/s -5%
Average Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
  (1631 - 1843, n=2)
1737 MB/s -6%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
1726 (1693.24min - 1725.96max) MB/s -6%
seq write
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=196, last 2 years)
3808 MB/s +95%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
3244 (3235.67min - 3244.28max) MB/s +67%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2936 (2843.29min - 2936.01max) MB/s +51%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
2597 (2465.83min - 2597.11max) MB/s +33%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2084 (2056.68min - 2083.94max) MB/s +7%
Average Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
  (1948 - 2139, n=2)
2044 MB/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
1948 (1920.78min - 1948.04max) MB/s
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
1520 (983.77min - 1519.6max) MB/s -22%
seq q8 t1 read
Average of class Gaming
  (1983 - 16089, n=196, last 2 years)
6357 MB/s +108%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
3556 (3302.07min - 3555.7max) MB/s +16%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
3539 (3185.08min - 3539.15max) MB/s +16%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
3260 (2957.4min - 3260.02max) MB/s +7%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
3055 (2833.88min - 3054.71max) MB/s
Average Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
  (3046 - 3055, n=2)
3051 MB/s 0%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2883 (2640.98min - 2882.54max) MB/s -6%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
2314 (1882.82min - 2314max) MB/s -24%
seq q8 t1 write
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=196, last 2 years)
4779 MB/s +198%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
3326 (3310.47min - 3326.44max) MB/s +107%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
3095 (2651.01min - 3095.4max) MB/s +93%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
3008 (2757.96min - 3007.74max) MB/s +87%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
2992 (2831.78min - 2991.8max) MB/s +86%
Average Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
  (1605 - 2176, n=2)
1891 MB/s +18%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
1605 (1471.36min - 1604.53max) MB/s
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
1449 (1364.2min - 1448.71max) MB/s -10%
4k q1 t1 read
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=196, last 2 years)
67.6 MB/s +16%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
65.9 (65.76min - 65.93max) MB/s +13%
Average Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
  (58.1 - 69.2, n=2)
63.7 MB/s +10%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
58.1 (56.93min - 58.05max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
55.4 (55.28min - 55.37max) MB/s -5%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
48.3 (47.05min - 48.34max) MB/s -17%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
47.4 (46.7min - 47.39max) MB/s -18%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
42.3 (41.29min - 42.34max) MB/s -27%
4k q1 t1 write
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
232 (225.02min - 231.55max) MB/s +53%
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 421, n=196, last 2 years)
224 MB/s +47%
Average Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
  (152 - 229, n=2)
190.5 MB/s +25%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
169 (168.56min - 169.29max) MB/s +11%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
152 (150.78min - 151.95max) MB/s
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
134 (132min - 134.1max) MB/s -12%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
121 (117.79min - 121.25max) MB/s -20%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
119 (118.14min - 119.03max) MB/s -22%
4k q32 t16 read
Average of class Gaming
  (313 - 6172, n=196, last 2 years)
2576 MB/s +87%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2267 (2208.12min - 2267.07max) MB/s +65%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
1806 (1804.4min - 1806.36max) MB/s +31%
Average Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
  (1376 - 1677, n=2)
1527 MB/s +11%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
1376 (1363.46min - 1375.66max) MB/s
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
1301 (981.55min - 1301max) MB/s -5%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
725 (711.04min - 724.91max) MB/s -47%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
645 (600.09min - 644.91max) MB/s -53%
4k q32 t16 write
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
2320 (2309.49min - 2320.47max) MB/s +420%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2264 (1817.1min - 2263.83max) MB/s +408%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=196, last 2 years)
2147 MB/s +381%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
1898 (1607.66min - 1897.67max) MB/s +326%
Average Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
  (446 - 1574, n=2)
1010 MB/s +126%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
497 (490.94min - 497.29max) MB/s +11%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
446 (399.97min - 446.29max) MB/s
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
416 (408.24min - 415.63max) MB/s -7%
AS SSD
Score Total
Average of class Gaming
  (1923 - 13854, n=184, last 2 years)
6784 Points +100%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
6141 Points +81%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
5503 Points +62%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
4869 Points +43%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
4170 Points +23%
Average Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
  (3394 - 4675, n=2)
4035 Points +19%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
3394 Points
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
3136 Points -8%
Score Read
Average of class Gaming
  (528 - 4721, n=184, last 2 years)
2489 Points +54%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
2158 Points +34%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2017 Points +25%
Average Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
  (1612 - 1860, n=2)
1736 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
1612 Points
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1597 Points -1%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
1506 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
1197 Points -26%
Score Write
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=184, last 2 years)
3089 Points +207%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
2892 Points +187%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2508 Points +149%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2452 Points +143%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
2370 Points +135%
Average Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
  (1007 - 1883, n=2)
1445 Points +43%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
1007 Points
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
918 Points -9%
Seq Read
Average of class Gaming
  (1759 - 12763, n=184, last 2 years)
4937 MB/s +91%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
3002 MB/s +16%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
2960 MB/s +14%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2873 MB/s +11%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
2589 MB/s
Average Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
  (2512 - 2589, n=2)
2551 MB/s -1%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2383 MB/s -8%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
2082 MB/s -20%
Seq Write
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=184, last 2 years)
3647 MB/s +154%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
2646 MB/s +84%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
2586 MB/s +80%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2466 MB/s +72%
Average Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
  (1435 - 1926, n=2)
1681 MB/s +17%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1619 MB/s +13%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
1435 MB/s
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
825 MB/s -43%
4K Read
Average of class Gaming
  (30.4 - 112.1, n=184, last 2 years)
66.7 MB/s +24%
Average Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
  (53.6 - 64.1, n=2)
58.8 MB/s +10%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
58.3 MB/s +9%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
57.5 MB/s +7%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
53.6 MB/s
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
46.84 MB/s -13%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
44.14 MB/s -18%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
42.41 MB/s -21%
4K Write
Average of class Gaming
  (96.3 - 512, n=184, last 2 years)
210 MB/s +36%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
188.1 MB/s +22%
Average Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
  (154.2 - 197.4, n=2)
175.8 MB/s +14%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
154.2 MB/s
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
149.6 MB/s -3%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
117.5 MB/s -24%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
98.3 MB/s -36%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
96.1 MB/s -38%
4K-64 Read
Average of class Gaming
  (312 - 3475, n=184, last 2 years)
1923 MB/s +48%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
1799 MB/s +38%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
1734 MB/s +33%
Average Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
  (1299 - 1545, n=2)
1422 MB/s +9%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
1299 MB/s
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
1255 MB/s -3%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1252 MB/s -4%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
854 MB/s -34%
4K-64 Write
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=184, last 2 years)
2517 MB/s +255%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
2440 MB/s +244%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2196 MB/s +209%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2088 MB/s +194%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
2015 MB/s +184%
Average Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
  (710 - 1493, n=2)
1101 MB/s +55%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
738 MB/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
710 MB/s
Access Time Read
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
0.109 ms * -95%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
0.056 ms *
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=182, last 2 years)
0.05422 ms * +3%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
0.049 ms * +12%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
0.048 ms * +14%
Average Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
  (0.039 - 0.056, n=2)
0.0475 ms * +15%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
0.043 ms * +23%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
0.04 ms * +29%
Access Time Write
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
0.17 ms * -530%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
0.094 ms * -248%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
0.082 ms * -204%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=184, last 2 years)
0.04705 ms * -74%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
0.032 ms * -19%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
0.027 ms *
Average Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
  (0.019 - 0.027, n=2)
0.023 ms * +15%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
0.02 ms * +26%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3138 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2242 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 490 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 553 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1970 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1984 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 57.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 146.2 MB/s

Continuous Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

01503004506007509001050120013501500165018001950210022502400255027002850Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS: Ø2984 (2805.94-2994.62)

图形性能

AMD Ryzen 7 5800H仍然有一个集成的Radeon RX Vega 8,但NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060笔记本GPU,更适合于要求高的任务。另外,你也可以购买配备RTX 3070的Apex。根据不同的性能配置,GPU会调出不同的性能。RTX 3060在娱乐和性能配置文件中的速度理论上是一样的,但它在安静和省电模式下缺乏15W的动态提升。

Apex通常在合成3DMark测试中占据榜首,而联想的Legion 是它在性能方面最激烈的竞争者。然而,老款Apex仅比其官方继任者的RTX 2070落后几个百分点。在所有测试中,目前的型号比我们数据库中所有配备RTX 3060的笔记本电脑的计算平均值好8%左右。

然而,大部分的GPU性能在电池模式下丢失。我们在3DMark 11中测得的降幅为67%。

3DMark 11
3DMark 11
Fire Strike
Fire Strike
Time Spy
Time Spy
Cloud Gate
Cloud Gate
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
100 pt
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
78.7 pt
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 9 3900
74.2 pt
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
73.8 pt
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
72.8 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
 
69.7 pt
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
66.6 pt
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
62.6 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72070, n=229, last 2 years)
40173 Points +33%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
30152 Points
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
29164 Points -3%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
27898 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 9 3900
27265 Points -10%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
26881 Points -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (13799 - 30772, n=43)
26816 Points -11%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
25142 Points -17%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (15902 - 193851, n=142, last 2 years)
135868 Points +40%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
127491 Points +31%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 9 3900
125918 Points +30%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
115858 Points +19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (33126 - 136826, n=38)
101628 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
97003 Points
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
83364 Points -14%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
82246 Points -15%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=233, last 2 years)
29268 Points +34%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
21828 Points
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
21806 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
21111 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 9 3900
20466 Points -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (16354 - 23109, n=49)
20436 Points -6%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
20312 Points -7%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
18806 Points -14%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22547, n=231, last 2 years)
11960 Points +35%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
8851 Points
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
8844 Points 0%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
8295 Points -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (6285 - 9235, n=49)
8057 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 9 3900
7931 Points -10%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
7677 Points -13%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7450 Points -16%
3DMark 11 Performance
24203 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
47847 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
20158 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
8932 points
Help

游戏性能

在游戏方面,Apex的表现符合预期,甚至略高于普通的RTX 3060。配备RTX 2070的老款Apex几乎总是领先于新款的几个百分点,这当然也是由于更快的处理器造成的。尽管如此,图形性能完全达到了目标。与其他竞争者的差异很小,Apex总是有一个好的排名。

所有测试的游戏在原生的全高清分辨率下,即使是最大的细节,仍然可以顺利地玩。游戏性能在 Witcher 3娱乐模式下比性能模式下低约5%至7%。

The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Gaming
  (54.1 - 718, n=127, last 2 years)
421 fps +48%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
362.3 (332min) fps +27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (221 - 449, n=35)
324 fps +14%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
285 fps
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
280 fps -2%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
280 fps -2%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Gaming
  (34.2 - 617, n=138, last 2 years)
327 fps +51%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
246 (224min) fps +13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (204 - 296, n=33)
237 fps +9%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
217 fps
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
216 fps 0%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming
  (17.5 - 449, n=165, last 2 years)
218 fps +46%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
149 fps
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
146 fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (81 - 186.8, n=41)
144.8 fps -3%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
143.9 (136min) fps -3%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
AMD Ryzen 9 3900, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
142 (118min) fps -5%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
142 fps -5%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
135 (114min) fps -9%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (8.61 - 216, n=224, last 2 years)
116.1 fps +35%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
86 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (58.2 - 91.5, n=48)
76.9 fps -11%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
75.6 (64min) fps -12%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
75.3 (73min) fps -12%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
AMD Ryzen 9 3900, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
74.5 (62min) fps -13%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
71.5 (68min, 68P1) fps -17%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
67 (64min, 64P1) fps -22%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
62.8 (59min, 60P1) fps -27%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
70.9 (60min) fps -18%
Far Cry 5
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (17 - 248, n=96, last 2 years)
140.3 fps +21%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
116 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (88 - 135, n=25)
114.2 fps -2%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
105 fps -9%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
88 fps -24%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 232, n=113, last 2 years)
134.4 fps +21%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
111 fps
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
109 (86min) fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (85 - 129, n=29)
107.7 fps -3%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
100 fps -10%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
85 fps -23%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (14 - 218, n=123, last 2 years)
125.8 fps +21%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
104 fps
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
102 (80min) fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (80 - 120, n=31)
101.6 fps -2%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
96 fps -8%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
80 fps -23%
New World
1920x1080 Medium Video Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (100.4 - 106.5, n=3, last 2 years)
103.3 fps +9%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
95 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (71 - 95, n=3)
80.6 fps -15%
1920x1080 High Video Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (83.7 - 97, n=3, last 2 years)
91.3 fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
91 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (66.1 - 91, n=4)
76.1 fps -16%
1920x1080 Very High Video Quality
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
84 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (66.2 - 94.5, n=3, last 2 years)
82.2 fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (62.3 - 84, n=4)
70.6 fps -16%
GTA V
1920x1080 Normal/Off AF:4x
Average of class Gaming
  (53 - 187.4, n=156, last 2 years)
175 fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
AMD Ryzen 9 3900, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
173 (4.04min, 125P1) fps +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (146 - 183.7, n=33)
170.2 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
169 (6.96min, 111P1) fps
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
164 (4.13min, 100P1) fps -3%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
158 (4.71min, 100P1) fps -7%
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
Average of class Gaming
  (15.3 - 187.1, n=180, last 2 years)
163.2 fps +10%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
AMD Ryzen 9 3900, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
160 (3.89min, 100P1) fps +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (120 - 179.4, n=42)
154 fps +4%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
150 (4.08min, 100P1) fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
148 (7.7min, 90.9P1) fps
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
146 (4.29min, 90.9P1) fps -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
142 (8.23min, 90.9P1) fps -4%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
133 (17.8min, 90.9P1) fps -10%
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (6.38 - 167.7, n=215, last 2 years)
106.7 fps +27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (69.2 - 109.8, n=46)
89.7 fps +7%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
AMD Ryzen 9 3900, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
87 (5.56min, 55.6P1) fps +4%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
86.6 (41.1min, 66.7P1) fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
83.7 (4.47min, 52.6P1) fps
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
83.4 (9.78min, 55.6P1) fps 0%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
81.5 (9.89min, 58.8P1) fps -3%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
81.3 (7.94min, 55.6P1) fps -3%
Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Average of class Gaming
  (30.9 - 244, n=234, last 2 years)
151.8 fps +20%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
134 (117.8min) fps +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (98.9 - 169.2, n=49)
133.6 fps +5%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
AMD Ryzen 9 3900, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
131 (114.9min) fps +3%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
128 (113.2min) fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
127 (110.5min) fps
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
115 (100.5min) fps -9%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
106 (94.3min) fps -17%
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average of class Gaming
  (26.9 - 220, n=235, last 2 years)
142.1 fps +19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (90.7 - 154.8, n=49)
125.9 fps +6%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
125 (109.6min) fps +5%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
AMD Ryzen 9 3900, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
124 (107.8min) fps +4%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
121 (105.8min) fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
119 (104.2min) fps
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
109 (95.1min) fps -8%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
102 (89.6min) fps -14%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 Standard Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (13 - 230, n=173, last 2 years)
143.4 fps +27%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
113 fps
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
106 fps -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (70.4 - 133.5, n=37)
105.6 fps -7%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
104 fps -8%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
102 fps -10%
X-Plane 11.11
1280x720 low (fps_test=1)
Average of class Gaming
  (15.3 - 221, n=228, last 2 years)
144.4 fps +38%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
122 fps +16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (83.6 - 157.1, n=48)
115.1 fps +10%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
AMD Ryzen 9 3900, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
112 fps +7%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
105 fps
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
98.9 fps -6%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
94.6 fps -10%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
87.1 fps -17%
1920x1080 med (fps_test=2)
Average of class Gaming
  (13.7 - 193.1, n=231, last 2 years)
127.3 fps +35%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
AMD Ryzen 9 3900, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
102 fps +8%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
102 fps +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (73 - 138.3, n=48)
100.9 fps +7%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
94.3 fps
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
87.2 fps -8%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
82.4 fps -13%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
80.7 fps -14%
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Gaming
  (12.4 - 166.2, n=240, last 2 years)
101.2 fps +33%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
83.3 fps +10%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
AMD Ryzen 9 3900, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
82.9 fps +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (61.9 - 109.3, n=48)
82 fps +8%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
76 fps
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
72.8 fps -4%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
70 fps -8%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
66.2 fps -13%
Strange Brigade
1920x1080 medium AA:medium AF:4
Average of class Gaming
  (22.2 - 508, n=172, last 2 years)
268 fps +49%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (154.9 - 242, n=38)
193.8 fps +8%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
192 (44.5min, 151P1) fps +7%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
180 (42.4min, 130P1) fps
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
160 (82.3min, 124P1) fps -11%
1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8
Average of class Gaming
  (17.5 - 465, n=188, last 2 years)
230 fps +45%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
159 (108min, 117P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (115.6 - 192.1, n=41)
157 fps -1%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
155 (101min, 110P1) fps -3%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
146 (5min, 109P1) fps -8%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
146 (74min, 110P1) fps -8%
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming
  (14.6 - 421, n=223, last 2 years)
205 fps +42%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
144 (91.6min, 111P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (102.2 - 166.3, n=43)
137.6 fps -4%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
134 (92.7min, 100P1) fps -7%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
134 (93min, 98.4P1) fps -7%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
128 (74.5min, 97P1) fps -11%

每秒的帧数在 Witcher 3在一小时的测试期间有一些波动,但总体上保持在大约同一水平。性能的显著下降并不明显。

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU: Ø84.1 (76-88)
low med. high ultra
GTA V (2015) 178 170 148 83.7
The Witcher 3 (2015) 285 217 149 86
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 145 133 127 119
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 113
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 105 94.3 76
Far Cry 5 (2018) 123 116 111 104
Strange Brigade (2018) 298 180 159 144
New World (2021) 116 95 91 84

排放--仍然比其他的要响亮

风扇噪音

好消息是。新的Apex现在比使用插座处理器的旧款更安静。除了性能模式外(部分情况下甚至在这里),风扇在空转时甚至大部分时间都保持安静。

然而,在负载情况下,这两个风扇的声音就会变得很大。在游戏和压力测试中,超过58 dB(A)的峰值为负值,这还不包括前代产品。在娱乐模式下,它仍然是55 dB(A),比大多数竞争对手的声音大。只有在低负荷下(3DMark06的第一个基准),该设备才会保持相对安静。

SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, R9 3900, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
Noise
-39%
-15%
6%
-7%
-7%
off / environment *
23
30
-30%
24.2
-5%
24.8
-8%
24
-4%
24
-4%
Idle Minimum *
23
35
-52%
29
-26%
24.6
-7%
24
-4%
24
-4%
Idle Average *
23
36
-57%
29
-26%
24.9
-8%
25
-9%
25
-9%
Idle Maximum *
26.4
39
-48%
29
-10%
24.9
6%
35
-33%
34
-29%
Load Average *
34.25
59
-72%
53.5
-56%
27.1
21%
44
-28%
44
-28%
Witcher 3 ultra *
58.4
62
-6%
53.5
8%
46.4
21%
48
18%
50
14%
Load Maximum *
58.42
63
-8%
53.5
8%
49
16%
50
14%
52
11%

* ... smaller is better

Noise Level

Idle
23 / 23 / 26.4 dB(A)
Load
34.25 / 58.42 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 23 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.142.541.12539.540.539.53141.839.141.8404130.941503727.2376340.324.340.38043.821.443.810038.223.938.212537.419.837.416036.818.736.820037.919.537.925039.215.439.231539.912.139.940041.79.541.750044.19.244.163046.77.946.7800458.245100046.98.446.9125047.88.847.8160047.89.547.82000469.846250046.910.146.9315046.610.846.6400044.511.144.5500042.411.542.4630040.511.640.5800037.111.637.11000031.111.631.11250027.511.327.51600022.910.522.9SPL57.322.957.3N11.80.411.8median 41.7median 11.1median 41.7Delta52.5534.936.834.140.136.234.239.735.136.334.934.836.834.3402831.926.929.430.93029.730.931.630.230.529.827.330.827.930.229.328.726.729.629.526.733.628.225.525.623.230.829.83224.224.321.520.230.827.828.823.722.62019.628.229.229.224.823.321.221.330.425.827.822.421.618.71828.928.530.326.822.72117.230.630.833.427.723.821.518.332.733.235.127.422.919.315.135.133.636.729.823.418.713.336.635.739.832.224.620.412.340.236.439.231.723.720.512.739.536.541.132.423.119.211.140.936.841.432.422.818.611.541.43943.933.72418.910.843.938.943.833.623.118.411.24437.743.532.222.217.811.343.436.241.930.920.714.811.241.936.64232.517.913.611.542.136.241.72915.412.71241.634.341.826.515.512.812.141.831.739.724.114.412.612.239.527.335.119.61312.412.235.124.832.816.81312.612.332.821.229.118.413.712.912.129.218.623.713.813.418.611.723.548.253.542.9332924.253.56.294.11.71.10.69median 33.6median 39.2median 27.7median 22.6median 18.6median 12.2median 39.54.55.85.23.73.41.75.6hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseSCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PSLenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL

温度

Apex 15可以在这里得分。响亮的风扇一定是有好处的。在负载下,性能模式下的温度甚至比娱乐模式下的温度略低。总的来说,它们是如此之低,以至于人们不禁要问,为什么Schenker不利用这里的余地在温度和音量之间创造一个更好的平衡。因此,Apex是最酷的,但显然也是比较中最吵的设备。在游戏时,Apex比我们的压力测试中的温度更高。

SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, R9 3900, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
Heat
-20%
-3%
-4%
-37%
-38%
Maximum Upper Side *
36
44
-22%
42.6
-18%
46.4
-29%
62
-72%
51
-42%
Maximum Bottom *
38
48
-26%
52.2
-37%
45.4
-19%
61
-61%
52
-37%
Idle Upper Side *
31
33
-6%
24.9
20%
26
16%
36
-16%
46
-48%
Idle Bottom *
33
41
-24%
25.3
23%
27.4
17%
33
-0%
41
-24%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

CPU核心以4.1GHz开始我们的压力测试。几秒钟后,时钟下降,直到最后稳定在3.2和3.5GHz之间。一小时后,核心温度约为88℃(约190°F),最高为98℃(约208°F)。

在同一时期,GPU时钟从1950MHz降至1340MHz。随后的3DMark 11测试没有发现由于之前的压力测试造成的任何性能损失。

一分钟后的压力测试
一分钟后的压力测试
一小时后的压力测试
一小时后的压力测试
Max. Load
 34 °C36 °C34 °C 
 34 °C36 °C32 °C 
 30 °C33 °C30 °C 
Maximum: 36 °C
Average: 33.2 °C
38 °C35 °C35 °C
33 °C31 °C32 °C
26 °C31 °C31 °C
Maximum: 38 °C
Average: 32.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42 °C | Room Temperature 18 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36 °C / 96.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-7.1 °C / -12.8 F).

演讲者

扬声器不是Apex的亮点之一。总的来说,它们过于安静,缺乏低音。它们甚至在中音和高音方面也不能大放异彩。至少有两个独立的音频端口用于外部模拟设备。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.62834.62538.239.538.23139.139.439.14034.429.434.45036.629.636.66333.626.133.68024.919.524.910022.418.522.41252016.52016022.716.122.720032.316.732.325045.515.545.531557.69.357.640056.7956.750058.48.358.463063.58.263.5800717.671100073.58.273.51250678.767160062.49.362.4200064.99.564.9250066.510.466.5315065.210.765.2400067.611.267.6500065.811.265.8630056.811.656.8800056.311.656.31000055.211.655.21250053.711.353.71600050.610.550.6SPL78.522.678.5N40.50.440.5median 57.6median 10.7median 57.6Delta10.2210.234.238.134.333.93030.127.330.729.63123.227.520.224.119.624.821.3321835.917.245.818.355.415.159.913.36112.36512.764.911.169.311.572.310.869.311.26911.373.911.270.511.568.91268.812.161.412.262.912.264.412.363.712.165.511.754.524.2810.648.7median 12.2median 64.41.78.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PSLenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.2% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源消耗 - 一个新的顶点

游戏一小时后,230瓦的电源
游戏一小时后,230瓦的电源

由于采用了笔记本CPU和Optimus,新的Apex现在明显比上一代产品更节俭。然而,它并不比其他竞争者更节俭。我们的测试设备在游戏过程中的消耗比对手多一点,但在平均负载或空闲时的消耗是相当的。

我们测得游戏期间的最大消耗为186瓦,因此230瓦的电源应该有足够的储备,可以在各种情况下可靠地充电。

Power Consumption
Idledarkmidlight 10.5 / 15 / 17 Watt
Load midlight 109 / 186 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
R9 3900, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV, , 1920x1080, 15.60
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.10
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-181%
9%
5%
-13%
15%
-7%
-30%
Idle Minimum *
10.5
55
-424%
7.3
30%
9.5
10%
11
-5%
5
52%
10.4 ?(5 - 22.8, n=41)
1%
Idle Average *
15
59
-293%
10.5
30%
12.1
19%
14
7%
10
33%
Idle Maximum *
17
63
-271%
15.7
8%
22.5
-32%
25
-47%
20
-18%
21.4 ?(11.8 - 48.2, n=41)
-26%
Load Average *
109
141
-29%
108
1%
99.5
9%
123
-13%
108
1%
109.3 ?(48.4 - 191, n=41)
-0%
Witcher 3 ultra *
186
238
-28%
175
6%
157
16%
176
5%
145
22%
Load Maximum *
186
259
-39%
228
-23%
173.5
7%
226
-22%
189
-2%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

0153045607590105120135150165180195210Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø186.4 (179.54-206.16)
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø184.1 (152.85-216.8)

电池寿命

可拆卸电池在原则上很好,绝对值得欢迎。然而,不那么美妙的是,可移动电池的容量只有49Wh。竞争对手无一例外地安装了70至90瓦特的电池。

制造商拥有的不同电源模式使其难以比较。似乎Apex的小电池可以获得相当多的运行时间,但它缺乏平衡模式,而我们在进行WLAN测试时通常使用这种模式。这样使用的 "省电 "模式更多的限制了性能,从而节省了更多的能源,但很难与对手的结果相比较。

在省电模式下,你可以计划一个电影之夜,大约4.5小时。在降低亮度的情况下,可以进行近6.5小时的网页浏览,而在最大亮度的情况下,运行时间减少到不到4.5小时。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
6h 29min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
4h 20min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
4h 37min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 21min
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 49 Wh
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
R9 3900, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 62 Wh
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 86 Wh
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 70 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-74%
-0%
35%
12%
-8%
14%
H.264
277
259
-6%
525
90%
WiFi v1.3
389
62
-84%
290
-25%
473
22%
306
-21%
354
-9%
Load
81
30
-63%
105
30%
119
47%
55
-32%
76
-6%
Reader / Idle
73
660
881
511
Witcher 3 ultra
96

Pros

+ 底座稳定,盖子是金属的
+ 很轻
+ 可更换电池
+ 2个固态硬盘插槽,1个2.5英寸插槽
+ 良好的性能
+ 表面温度低

Cons

- 比竞争对手厚一点
- 没有SD读卡器,1个USB 2.0
- 非常响亮的风扇
- 电池小

结论 - 请优化冷却系统!

Schenker XMG Apex 15,由Schenker提供。
Schenker XMG Apex 15,由Schenker提供。

Schenker的Apex 15在基本配置上相当便宜,但在性能上却发挥了顶级水平。同样值得肯定的是,维护相当容易,可拆卸的电池极大地提高了寿命和环境兼容性。

然而,申克公司不得不接受对冷却系统不平衡的真正批评。这确保了Apex比所有的竞争者都能保持较低的温度,但声音太大,甚至在娱乐模式下也是如此!

总的来说,Apex的起源和原始目的是显而易见的。厚重的机箱及其激进的冷却系统即仍然是为插座处理器设计的,可能未来会有一个带有台式CPU的型号出现。然而,目前的Apex 15对于其笔记本硬件来说主要是太吵了。

Schenker XMG Apex 15具有良好的性能,但它是为插座式CPU设计的,在笔记本电脑的比较中,它有点太厚了,最重要的是没有必要太大声。

在目前的驱动状态/冷却系统下,实际上几乎没有任何理由喜欢Apex而不是其对手联想Legion 5华硕TUF Gaming 。这三个对手的性能不相上下,但在同样的性能模式下,Apex的声音实在太大。同时,Apex在任何学科上都不能真正积极地脱颖而出。只有可拆卸的电池可以成为Apex寿命的一个积极论据。然而,它比竞争对手的要小。

价格和可用性

在申克公司自己的商店Bestware我们的测试配置价格为1506欧元(约合1705美元),外加运费。在邮购零售商如Cyberport,同一型号的价格甚至更高,约1629欧元(~$1844).

SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS - 11/15/2021 v7
Christian Hintze

Chassis
78 / 98 → 80%
Keyboard
79%
Pointing Device
79%
Connectivity
62 / 80 → 77%
Weight
62 / 10-66 → 93%
Battery
65 / 95 → 68%
Display
86%
Games Performance
96%
Application Performance
94%
Temperature
90 / 95 → 95%
Noise
80 / 90 → 88%
Audio
63%
Camera
38 / 85 → 45%
Average
75%
84%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Schenker XMG Apex 15 in 游戏笔记本电脑回顾。这次采用了笔记本电脑的CPU,但仍采用了台式机的冷却系统
Christian Hintze, 2021-11-27 (Update: 2021-11-27)