Notebookcheck

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH gaming laptop review: GPU performance sacrificed for a slimmer build

不惜一切代价瘦身? 微星GS76 Stealth是市场上最轻薄的游戏笔记本电脑之一。尽管结构很薄,但微星在我们测试的11UH-074高级型号的引擎盖下装了一个GeForce RTX 3080。在此了解这一策略是否成功。
Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Tiger Lake MSI
微星GS76 Stealth

虽然其他微星游戏笔记本相当笨重(例如,我们记得17英寸GT76怪物),但GS系列给人的印象非常微妙和谨慎。最新的17英寸机型采用了英特尔第11代的处理器。采用Core i7-11800HCore i9-11900H的型号目前已在德国主页上列出。

苛刻的图形计算由带有8GB VRAM的GeForce RTX 3070或带有8或16GB VRAM的GeForce RTX 3080处理。伴随着32至64GB的DDR4-3200内存,以及容量为1或2TB的NVMe SSD。对于显示器,你可以选择300或360赫兹的全高清面板,或120赫兹的4K面板。

我们的审查是基于GS76 11UH-074版本,价格约为4,400欧元(约5,159美元)。它配备了64GB内存,2TB固态硬盘,Core i9-11900H,以及GeForce RTX 3080。

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH (GS76 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i9-11900H 8 x 2.5 - 4.9 GHz, 109 W PL2 / Short Burst, 90 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake H45
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU - 16384 MB, Core: 1245 MHz, Memory: 1500 MHz, 95 W TDP, GDDR6, ForceWare 471.96, Optimus
Memory
65536 MB 
, 2x 32 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-3200, dual-channel, two slots (both in use)
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 255 PPI, AUO B173ZAN06.1 (AUODE95), IPS, UHD, glossy: no, 120 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM570
Storage
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, 2048 GB 
, NVMe SSD, two M.2 slots (one in use)
Soundcard
Intel Tiger Point-LP PCH - cAVS
Connections
3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 0 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 1 combined port (headset/mic), Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-III)
Networking
Killer E3100G 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW) (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 20 x 396 x 259
Battery
99.9 Wh Lithium-Polymer, 4 cells
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD (720p @30 fps)
Additional features
Speakers: 2x 2W Dynaudio, Keyboard: SteelSeries Chiclet RGB, Keyboard Light: yes, 230-watt power adapter, MSI Center, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.384 kg, Power Supply: 590 g
Price
4,399 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

GS76 11UH的竞争对手包括其他配备GeForce RTX 3080的高端游戏笔记本电脑,其厚度不超过2.5厘米。除了Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YDAsus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSDRazer Blade Pro 17 2021Medion Erazer Beast X25这里也应该提到。这些笔记本电脑在表中被列为对比设备。

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86.2 %
09/2021
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg20 mm17.30"3840x2160
88 %
09/2021
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
i9-11980HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.8 kg22 mm17.30"3840x2160
90.1 %
08/2021
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.8 kg19.9 mm17.30"2560x1440
87.8 %
09/2021
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
3 kg19.9 mm17.30"3840x2160
85 %
08/2021
Medion Erazer Beast X25
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg23 mm17.30"1920x1080

案例

让我们直接进入最大的弱点之一。尽管GS系列经过几代人的努力已经变得更加坚固,但目前的型号仍然在稳定性和抗扭性上挣扎。当施加强大的压力时,不仅触摸板区域的基本单元明显弯曲,而且键盘的中心也是如此。尽管有类似的薄型设计,大多数制造商在这方面做得更好。

除此之外,这款机箱几乎没有什么可以批评的地方。与前辈GS75 相比,微星没有使用金色的元素,这使得17英寸机看起来更加清醒,同时也在任何情况或环境下给人留下时尚和谨慎的印象。除了C罩和D罩之间在某些方面的过渡略显粗糙之外,其制造质量也能够给人留下深刻印象。GS76在质量方面也是令人满意的。深色金属表面是指纹磁铁,但除了缺乏稳定性外,感觉非常优质。

微星GS76 Stealth
微星GS76 Stealth
微星GS76 Stealth
微星GS76 Stealth
微星GS76 Stealth
微星GS76 Stealth
微星GS76 Stealth
微星GS76 Stealth
微星GS76 Stealth
微星GS76 Stealth

GS75的重量约为2.4公斤,也是最轻的17英寸游戏设备之一。除了Medion Beast X25,所有的竞争对手都要重几百克(2.8-3.0公斤)。结合其较低的建筑高度(不含脚垫约2厘米),微星笔记本电脑携带起来相当舒适。

Size comparison

396 mm 270 mm 22 mm 2.8 kg395 mm 262 mm 23 mm 2.3 kg396 mm 259 mm 20 mm 2.4 kg395 mm 260 mm 19.9 mm 3 kg394 mm 264 mm 19.9 mm 2.8 kg

连接性

端口

在端口方面,微星是与时俱进的。正如你所期望的那样,GS76提供了一个雷电4端口,支持DisplayPort和Power Delivery。加上第二个USB Type-C端口(也支持DisplayPort),以及HDMI 2.1输出(120 Hz @4K或60 Hz @8K),可以连接多达三个外部显示器。此外,还有两个经典的USB Type-A端口(3.2 Gen 2)、一个2.5千兆网口(Killer E3100G以太网控制器)、一个3.5毫米音频插孔、一个读卡器(UHS-III)和一个Kensington锁的插槽。

由于这些端口被挤在两个侧面的中央区域,使用鼠标时可能会出现运动限制,这取决于所涉及的电缆数量。

左侧。电源,RJ45-LAN,2个USB-A 3.2 Gen 2,3.5毫米音频插孔
左侧。电源,RJ45-LAN,2个USB-A 3.2 Gen 2,3.5毫米音频插孔
右侧。USB-C 3.2 Gen 2(包括DisplayPort),读卡器,雷电4,HDMI 2.1,Kensington锁。
右侧。USB-C 3.2 Gen 2(包括DisplayPort),读卡器,雷电4,HDMI 2.1,Kensington锁。

SD卡阅读器

该读卡器提供了一个非常好的性能。用我们的128GB AV Pro V60参考microSD卡连续读取时的速度为199MB/s,传输照片时的速度为196MB/s,在测试领域排名第二。只有Razer Blade 17 Pro 2021表现得更好。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
199.6 MB/s ∼100% +2%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
196 MB/s ∼98%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
184 MB/s ∼92% -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
 
183 (181.31min - 182.94max) MB/s ∼92% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (18 - 222, n=93, last 2 years)
117 MB/s ∼59% -40%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
79 MB/s ∼40% -60%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
 
256.95 MB/s ∼100% +29%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
199 MB/s ∼77%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
191.6 MB/s ∼75% -4%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
188 MB/s ∼73% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (20.5 - 257, n=93, last 2 years)
131 MB/s ∼51% -34%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
79 MB/s ∼31% -60%

沟通

Wi-Fi 6E Killer AX1675x芯片负责无线连接。它支持蓝牙5.2和WLAN 802.11b/g/n/ac/ax标准。在与我们的Netgear Nighthawk AX12参考路由器(1米距离)的测试中,GS76没有显示出任何弱点。1,499 Mb/s(发送)和1,328 Mb/s(接收)分别是优秀的速率。

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1588 (1508min - 1656max) MBit/s ∼100% +6%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1539 (842min - 1691max) MBit/s ∼97% +3%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)
1499 (1390min - 1622max) MBit/s ∼94%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1498 (748min - 1544max) MBit/s ∼94% 0%
Average Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)
  (1083 - 1499, n=5)
1311 MBit/s ∼83% -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (496 - 1645, n=160, last 2 years)
1154 MBit/s ∼73% -23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
MediaTek MT7921
636 (325min - 728max) MBit/s ∼40% -58%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1495 (788min - 1534max) MBit/s ∼100% +13%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1390 (669min - 1618max) MBit/s ∼93% +5%
Average Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)
  (1242 - 1469, n=5)
1356 MBit/s ∼91% +2%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)
1328 (642min - 1384max) MBit/s ∼89%
Average of class Gaming
  (90 - 1743, n=160, last 2 years)
1217 MBit/s ∼81% -8%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1152 (915min - 1267max) MBit/s ∼77% -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
MediaTek MT7921
698 (529min - 748max) MBit/s ∼47% -47%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016006421197118011861368121211331352134813441372137613481345138113351384134813731344136113651320133413761367137613541371137864211971180118613681212113313521348134413721376134813451381133513841348137313441361136513201334137613671376135413711378151515851582154715831503160416011622153415561500142914251399149313941445148514631414139013991520146814051484158614351594Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1306 (642-1384)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1499 (1390-1622)

网络摄像头

事实证明,内置的720p网络摄像头不那么令人印象深刻。与大多数对手一样,它缺乏色彩准确性和图像清晰度。

ColorChecker
13.6 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
19.7 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
12 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
19.5 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
11 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
ColorChecker MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH: 14.38 ∆E min: 1.18 - max: 23.79 ∆E

辅料

盒子里包括一个230瓦的电源适配器,它并不特别紧凑,还有一些信息手册。

维护

维修选项相当令人失望。那些打破机箱底部的原厂封条并卸下15颗十字头螺钉的人确实可以掀开整个底盖,但由于存在巨大的胶合铝箔表面,里面只有风扇、电池、M.2插槽和无线模块可以接触。CPU或GPU的冷却系统和内存则不容易接触到。这是不必要的,其他制造商已经用更好的方式解决了这个问题。

微星GS76 Stealth
微星GS76 Stealth
微星GS76 Stealth

担保

保修期延长至24个月(提货和退货服务)。

输入设备

键盘

和微星笔记本电脑一样,键盘布局需要很多时间来适应,它在很多地方与标准不同(见照片),这就是为什么你首先需要花一些时间来熟悉它。尽管稳定性不理想,但该键盘以良好的打字体验而得分。特别是由于相对较高的键程和清晰的行程,产生了坚定的反馈,而且输入并不特别安静。旧的GS型号部分配备了相当模糊的键盘。因此,我们可以看到这里有了改进。

除了有点窄的数字键盘之外,其他的尺寸都很好。玩家还可以享受到可以在几个级别上调整的RGB灯光。一个小小的缺点。由于键盘的中心位置,掌托的高度是有限的。因此,较大的手会不高兴地放在机箱的边缘。

RGB照明
RGB照明

触摸板

总的来说,触摸板有一些需要补上的地方。由于稳定性适中,鼠标的替代物显然可以被推倒,而且它在输入时很快就会发出响声,这对感知的质量是不利的。准确度也可以更好一点。至少光滑的表面提供了一个愉快的滑行体验。尺寸让人喜忧参半。虽然触摸板的宽度为12厘米,令人愉快,但6厘米的高度却有点低。在手势支持方面没有问题(用两个手指缩放和滚动,等等)。

显示

顶级型号配备了现有显示屏中最清晰的显示屏。这块4K显示屏有AUO B173ZAN06.1的称号,提供3840x2160像素的分辨率。

464
cd/m²
448
cd/m²
423
cd/m²
480
cd/m²
474
cd/m²
436
cd/m²
477
cd/m²
452
cd/m²
428
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AUO B173ZAN06.1 (AUODE95)
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 480 cd/m² Average: 453.6 cd/m² Minimum: 21 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 474 cd/m²
Contrast: 1030:1 (Black: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.5 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5, calibrated: 0.86
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
65% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.158
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
AUO B173ZAN06.1 (AUODE95), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
AU Optronics AUO329B, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
BOE099D (BOE CQ NE173QHM-NY3), IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
AU Optronics B173ZAN03.3, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30
Medion Erazer Beast X25
BOE NE173FHM-NZ1 (BOE0884), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Display
32%
28%
33%
9%
Display P3 Coverage
63
86.86
38%
94.2
50%
88.6
41%
70.4
12%
sRGB Coverage
94.8
99.99
5%
98.7
4%
99.98
5%
99.8
5%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
65
99.63
53%
84.4
30%
99.94
54%
71.6
10%
Response Times
-399%
10%
-81%
4%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
8.8 ?(2.8, 6)
52 ?(25.2, 26.8)
-491%
4.8
45%
15.2 ?(7.6, 7.6)
-73%
9.2 ?(4.8, 4.4)
-5%
Response Time Black / White *
6.4 ?(2, 4.4)
26 ?(10, 16)
-306%
8
-25%
12 ?(6, 6)
-88%
5.6 ?(2.8, 2.8)
12%
PWM Frequency
Screen
22%
-31%
-115%
-10%
Brightness middle
474
488
3%
322
-32%
407.2
-14%
329
-31%
Brightness
454
467
3%
288
-37%
403
-11%
315
-31%
Brightness Distribution
88
86
-2%
72
-18%
90
2%
88
0%
Black Level *
0.46
0.33
28%
0.3
35%
0.42
9%
0.33
28%
Contrast
1030
1479
44%
1073
4%
970
-6%
997
-3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.5
1.23
18%
3.05
-103%
7.25
-383%
2.03
-35%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.59
2.94
47%
5.23
6%
12.51
-124%
5.5
2%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
0.86
0.77
10%
1.92
-123%
3.62
-321%
0.82
5%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.8
1.5
46%
3.11
-11%
8.1
-189%
3.5
-25%
Gamma
2.158 102%
2.169 101%
2.13 103%
2.24 98%
2.223 99%
CCT
6597 99%
6614 98%
6553 99%
5925 110%
6526 100%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
99
84
88.1
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99
99
100
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-115% / -36%
2% / -13%
-54% / -78%
1% / -4%

* ... smaller is better

与其他一些4K笔记本电脑不同,刷新率不是60赫兹,而是120赫兹,这应该使GS76也适合快速游戏。这一说法得到了实测响应时间的支持。 6.黑到白4毫秒,灰到灰8.8毫秒,以笔记本电脑的标准来说是非常好的--特别是对于UHD显示器。

其余的结果也是可敬的。只有Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD接近454 cd/m²的平均亮度,但它的响应时间明显更差。由于这个数值和磨砂表面,即使在有些明亮的地方也可以在户外使用,只要你不把它暴露在过度的阳光下。

卡尔曼:灰鳞
卡尔曼:灰鳞
卡尔曼:色彩饱和度
卡尔曼:色彩饱和度
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: 灰度表(已校准
CalMAN: 灰度表(已校准
CalMAN:色彩饱和度(已校准)。
CalMAN:色彩饱和度(已校准)。
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)

1,030:1的对比度只排在中场。其原因是0.46cd/m²的不理想的黑色水平。在可视角度方面没有什么惊喜。正如广视角面板(IPS级别)所预期的那样,只有在非常倾斜的视角下才能看到颜色和亮度的微小变化。我们没有观察到任何屏幕闪烁(例如,像PWM)或过多的屏幕渗漏。

微星GS76 Stealth 11UH与sRGB对比
微星GS76 Stealth 11UH与sRGB对比
子像素网格
子像素网格
微星GS76 Stealth 11UH与AdobeRGB的对比
微星GS76 Stealth 11UH与AdobeRGB的对比

开箱后的色彩再现已经非常好(DeltaE 2000小于2)。校准将平均DeltaE值提高到1以下(我们的ICC文件在上面有链接)。至于色彩空间,95%的sRGB被覆盖,其次是65%的AdobeRGB。所有的显示测量都是使用真彩模式 "sRGB "进行的(MSI控制图像复制的软件)。

逆光而行
逆光而行
视角
视角

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.8 ms rise
↘ 6 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17031 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

测试条件

各种系统设置可以在预装的MSI中心进行调整。我们使用用户场景 "极端性能"(没有额外的风扇涡轮增压)进行测试。此外,图形切换始终处于活动状态(MSHybrid @GPU Switch)。

MSI中心
MSI中心
MSI中心
MSI中心
MSI中心
MSI中心

业绩

八核CPU,16GB的GPU,以及64GB的慷慨的RAM。GS76 11UH-074属于绝对的高端范围--考虑到4,400欧元(约5,159美元)的高价,这并不令人惊讶。

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
AS SSD基准测试
水晶盘标志

处理器

微星为其顶级型号选择了英特尔当前Tiger Lake 代中最强的处理器之一。酷睿i9-11900H提供24MB的L3缓存和八个核心,通过超线程技术可以实现多达16个并行线程。这款10纳米芯片的基本时钟速度为2.5GHz。在负载情况下--取决于应用和压力--可以达到4.9GHz。TDP为45瓦,与其他大多数具有六个或八个内核的移动CPU一致。HWiNFO工具显示PL1值为90瓦,PL2值为109瓦。

在我们的基准测试过程中,GS76以非常高的速度表现出众,但正如我们的Cinebench循环所显示的那样,其性能随着时间的推移有所下降。基于11900H/11980HK5900HX的对比笔记本电脑从长远来看往往会获得一些优势。另一方面,较老的彗星湖对应产品(例如采用Core i7-10875H )则大大落后。

Cinebench R15 Multi endurance test

011022033044055066077088099011001210132014301540165017601870198020902147.652063.982007.531967.921946.471942.971939.491934.81929.011918.831901.411897.171903.041879.521902.861896.541882.181885.191873.271888.041892.771891.431868.551832.591883.682067.291991.541963.961924.6520202036.042060.582032.522039.262062.282049.082065.482021.322027.882031.182010.352052.332026.032029.532029.532053.922024.71979.121952.172026.342180.072090.082104.272063.772067.722163.682144.3121482093.042064.732165.212043.842143.052160.992098.862070.612183.762151.812081.492062.072163.452153.22167.432087.362059.941484.291483.511469.351486.441473.571482.631485.171471.071483.351484.41478.251483.351485.771480.221485.171483.181481.921482.411484.231479.671482.471487.431480.221480.821480.821489.041485.061482.741481.761478.851484.011483.181480.061474.761476.671484.061480.771480.821485.721484.011480.931485.331481.921484.621481.871481.151483.461484.731481.761483.292041.342007.532014.812010.662016.232005.522005.411996.512000.72003.412007.022011.671987.082006.622006.821985.72002.71981.961992.731997.41993.522007.431994.122005.922013.39Tooltip
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H: Ø1923 (1832.59-2147.65)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD Intel Core i9-11980HK: Ø2023 (1924.65-2067.29)
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD Intel Core i9-11900H: Ø2117 (2043.84-2183.76)
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1482 (1469.35-1489.04)
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX: Ø2004 (1981.96-2041.34)
Cinebench R23
CPU (Multi Core)
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
13012 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
12720 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Intel Core i9-11900H
  (11567 - 13012, n=3)
12433 Points ∼96% -4%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
12373 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (4621 - 14363, n=88, last 2 years)
10906 Points ∼84% -16%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H
9071 (8918.34min - 9070.5max) Points ∼70% -30%
CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
1586 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Intel Core i9-11900H
  (1574 - 1586, n=3)
1578 Points ∼99% 0%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
1575 Points ∼99%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1491 Points ∼94% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (1095 - 1619, n=87, last 2 years)
1369 Points ∼86% -13%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H
1270 Points ∼80% -19%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
Intel Core i9-11980HK
5256 Points ∼100% +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
5023 Points ∼96% +3%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
4878 Points ∼93%
Average Intel Core i9-11900H
  (4403 - 5160, n=4)
4866 Points ∼93% 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
4776 Points ∼91% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (1397 - 6321, n=191, last 2 years)
3764 Points ∼72% -23%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H
3531 Points ∼67% -28%
CPU (Single Core)
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
610 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
608 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Intel Core i9-11900H
  (600 - 610, n=4)
605 Points ∼99% -1%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
Intel Core i9-11980HK
585 Points ∼96% -4%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
581 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (312 - 634, n=190, last 2 years)
500 Points ∼82% -18%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H
490 Points ∼80% -20%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
2184 (2043.84min - 2183.76max) Points ∼100% +2%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
2148 (1832.59min - 2147.65max) Points ∼98%
Average Intel Core i9-11900H
  (2029 - 2211, n=4)
2143 Points ∼98% 0%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
Intel Core i9-11980HK
2067 (1924.65min - 2067.29max) Points ∼95% -4%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
2041 (1981.96min - 2041.34max) Points ∼93% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (536 - 2804, n=208, last 2 years)
1602 Points ∼73% -25%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H
1489 (1469.35min - 1489.04max) Points ∼68% -31%
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
241 Points ∼100% +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
239 Points ∼99% 0%
Average Intel Core i9-11900H
  (236 - 241, n=4)
239 Points ∼99% 0%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
238 Points ∼99%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
Intel Core i9-11980HK
230 Points ∼95% -3%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H
203 Points ∼84% -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (108 - 254, n=197, last 2 years)
203 Points ∼84% -15%
Blender 2.79 - BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (179 - 555, n=173, last 2 years)
313 Seconds * ∼100% -26%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H
302 Seconds * ∼96% -21%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
250 Seconds * ∼80% -0%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
249 Seconds * ∼80%
Average Intel Core i9-11900H
  (231 - 249, n=4)
241 Seconds * ∼77% +3%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
Intel Core i9-11980HK
233 Seconds * ∼74% +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
231 Seconds * ∼74% +7%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
59182 MIPS ∼100% +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
57263 MIPS ∼97% +8%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
Intel Core i9-11980HK
56759 MIPS ∼96% +7%
Average Intel Core i9-11900H
  (50441 - 57263, n=4)
53766 MIPS ∼91% +1%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
53205 MIPS ∼90%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H
45258 MIPS ∼76% -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (15146 - 75612, n=174, last 2 years)
44992 MIPS ∼76% -15%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
5795 MIPS ∼100% +3%
Average Intel Core i9-11900H
  (5582 - 5870, n=4)
5722 MIPS ∼99% +1%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
Intel Core i9-11980HK
5668 MIPS ∼98% 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5664 MIPS ∼98% 0%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
5640 MIPS ∼97%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H
5338 MIPS ∼92% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (2945 - 6174, n=174, last 2 years)
5245 MIPS ∼91% -7%
Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
Intel Core i9-11980HK
9884 Points ∼100% 0%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
9856 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
9628 Points ∼97% -2%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
9294 Points ∼94% -6%
Average Intel Core i9-11900H
  (7725 - 9856, n=4)
9218 Points ∼93% -6%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H
8134 Points ∼82% -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (2783 - 11393, n=172, last 2 years)
7184 Points ∼73% -27%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
1648 Points ∼100% +1%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
1632 Points ∼99%
Average Intel Core i9-11900H
  (1576 - 1648, n=4)
1620 Points ∼98% -1%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
Intel Core i9-11980HK
1613 Points ∼98% -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1529 Points ∼93% -6%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H
1315 Points ∼80% -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (703 - 1777, n=172, last 2 years)
1310 Points ∼79% -20%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
16.7 fps ∼100% +11%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
Intel Core i9-11980HK
15.8 fps ∼95% +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
15.8 fps ∼95% +5%
Average Intel Core i9-11900H
  (14.9 - 16.7, n=4)
15.4 fps ∼92% +3%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
15 fps ∼90%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.13 - 19.8, n=173, last 2 years)
12.4 fps ∼74% -17%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H
12.1 fps ∼72% -19%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Average of class Gaming
  (23.9 - 113, n=166, last 2 years)
54.8 s * ∼100% -11%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
49.3 s * ∼90% -0%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
49.3 s * ∼90%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H
45.3 s * ∼83% +8%
Average Intel Core i9-11900H
  (40.5 - 49.3, n=4)
45 s * ∼82% +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
44.4 s * ∼81% +10%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
Intel Core i9-11980HK
41.1 s * ∼75% +17%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.587 sec * ∼100% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.4907 - 1.088, n=168, last 2 years)
0.581 sec * ∼99% -9%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
Intel Core i9-11980HK
0.552 sec * ∼94% -4%
Average Intel Core i9-11900H
  (0.529 - 0.544, n=4)
0.534 sec * ∼91% -0%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
0.533 sec * ∼91%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
0.53 sec * ∼90% +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
0.4926 sec * ∼84% +8%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2148 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
190 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
238 Points
Help

系统性能

GS76 11UH的系统性能达到了很高的期望值,尽管它只够在PCMark 10中排名倒数第二。不过,总分的差异是很小的。

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7245 Points ∼100% +6%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
7088 Points ∼98% +4%
Average Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (6822 - 7245, n=2)
7034 Points ∼97% +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
6842 Points ∼94% 0%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
6822 Points ∼94%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
6531 Points ∼90% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (3952 - 7884, n=176, last 2 years)
6133 Points ∼85% -10%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10630 Points ∼100% +10%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
10212 Points ∼96% +5%
Average Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (9690 - 10630, n=2)
10160 Points ∼96% +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10018 Points ∼94% +3%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
9919 Points ∼93% +2%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9690 Points ∼91%
Average of class Gaming
  (7148 - 11266, n=175, last 2 years)
9657 Points ∼91% 0%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Medion Erazer Beast X25
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9252 Points ∼100% +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9182 Points ∼99% +3%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
9098 Points ∼98% +2%
Average Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (8882 - 9182, n=2)
9032 Points ∼98% +2%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8882 Points ∼96%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
8448 Points ∼91% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (5813 - 10066, n=175, last 2 years)
8289 Points ∼90% -7%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10573 Points ∼100% +6%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
10403 Points ∼98% +4%
Average Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (10014 - 10573, n=2)
10294 Points ∼97% +3%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10014 Points ∼95%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9377 Points ∼89% -6%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
9021 Points ∼85% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (3670 - 12250, n=175, last 2 years)
7943 Points ∼75% -21%
PCMark 10 Score
6822 points
Help

DPC延迟

虽然GS76的延迟是测试领域中最低的,但根据LatencyMon工具,它只适合在有限的范围内进行实时视频和音频编辑。

延迟监测
延迟监测
延迟监测
延迟监测
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2676.3 μs * ∼100% -251%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
1713.5 μs * ∼64% -125%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1444.5 μs * ∼54% -90%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
906.7 μs * ∼34% -19%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
761.6 μs * ∼28%

* ... smaller is better

储存

当涉及到存储时,事情才真正起飞。微星为17英寸机提供了一个极快的PCIe 4固态硬盘,大大超过了旧的PCIe 3驱动器(至少在纸上)。三星PM9A1的2TB版本也被安装在我们的测试设备华硕ROG GX703HSD中,正如预期的那样,它在那里的表现同样出色。如果你想扩大存储空间,机箱内还有一个空的M.2插槽(但只有PCIe 3.0)。

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
2%
1%
-44%
-37%
Write 4K
230.7
230.4
0%
244.2
6%
123.5
-46%
129.7
-44%
Read 4K
87.89
91.59
4%
89.8
2%
45.96
-48%
62.37
-29%
Write Seq
4300
4216
-2%
1861
-57%
2436
-43%
Read Seq
4392
4543
3%
1584
-64%
2354
-46%
Write 4K Q32T1
582.3
666.5
14%
606.77
4%
466.4
-20%
512.3
-12%
Read 4K Q32T1
730
727.6
0%
657.86
-10%
565.5
-23%
436.2
-40%
Write Seq Q32T1
5152
5043
-2%
5269.7
2%
2981
-42%
3541
-31%
Read Seq Q32T1
7094
6821
-4%
7090.6
0%
3260
-54%
3568
-50%
AS SSD
-1%
14%
-67%
-28%
Seq Read
5408.03
5437.72
1%
5085
-6%
2068.48
-62%
2591.36
-52%
Seq Write
3863.11
3904
1%
4434
15%
2046.62
-47%
1899.86
-51%
4K Read
52.67
56.23
7%
80.35
53%
47.85
-9%
53.88
2%
4K Write
153.05
165.79
8%
214.69
40%
87.38
-43%
112.63
-26%
4K-64 Read
2691.54
2488.63
-8%
2572.6
-4%
1932.35
-28%
1334.74
-50%
4K-64 Write
3413.91
3479.64
2%
2972.36
-13%
2016.74
-41%
2966.31
-13%
Access Time Read *
0.046
0.054
-17%
0.018
61%
0.055
-20%
0.038
17%
Access Time Write *
0.027
0.026
4%
0.02
26%
0.128
-374%
0.036
-33%
Score Read
3285
3089
-6%
3161
-4%
2187
-33%
1648
-50%
Score Write
3953
4036
2%
3631
-8%
2309
-42%
3269
-17%
Score Total
8830
8620
-2%
8380
-5%
5612
-36%
5733
-35%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
1% / 0%
8% / 9%
-56% / -57%
-33% / -32%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7094 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5152 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 730 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 582.3 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 4392 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 4300 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 87.89 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 230.7 MB/s

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

0335670100513401675201023452680301533503685402043554690502553605695603063655846.656586.326590.756591.386591.86592.846593.456595.156596.176596.196596.46598.486599.546599.966600.596601.426602.266602.686603.316603.516604.776607.086608.126608.126608.136608.766610.016611.056611.686612.316613.7966146615.456616.516617.566619.246620.686620.926621.316623.236623.826623.856625.326625.956626.796628.846632.826639.936645.386647.97Tooltip
: Ø6596 (5846.65-6647.97)

图形卡

由于TGP差异很大,估计目前Nvidia显卡的性能并不是一件容易的事。就GS76而言,GeForce RTX 3080 ,理论上可达165瓦(包括动态提升),但运行时的TGP只有95瓦;这可能导致Nvidia的Ampere系列顶级型号的性能比便宜得多的RTX 3070

相应地,GS76在合成图形基准测试中排在最后也就不足为奇了。尽管其高度相当,但华硕Zephyrus S17的部分速度超过20%。这也难怪,因为华硕允许RTX 3080消耗140瓦特。排放量是否至少比竞争对手低的回报,我们很快就会分析的。

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (31288 - 43744, n=31)
38767 Points ∼100% +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
38087 Points ∼98% +12%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
37171 Points ∼96% +9%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
35787 Points ∼92% +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
35678 Points ∼92% +5%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
34062 Points ∼88%
Average of class Gaming
  (1925 - 43077, n=187, last 2 years)
26878 Points ∼69% -21%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
28939 Points ∼100% +16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (20538 - 32366, n=34)
28057 Points ∼97% +12%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
26771 Points ∼93% +7%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
26486 Points ∼92% +6%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
26177 Points ∼90% +5%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
25043 Points ∼87%
Average of class Gaming
  (1360 - 34993, n=197, last 2 years)
20252 Points ∼70% -19%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
11424 Points ∼100% +22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (8920 - 13210, n=33)
11051 Points ∼97% +18%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
10898 Points ∼95% +16%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
10752 Points ∼94% +15%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
9989 Points ∼87% +7%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
9377 Points ∼82%
Average of class Gaming
  (429 - 13210, n=201, last 2 years)
7742 Points ∼68% -17%
3DMark 11 Performance
28333 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
35442 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
21544 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
9326 points
Help

游戏性能

疲软的TGP对游戏基准也有不利影响。GS76在这里也经常不得不向其竞争对手认输。然而,性能足以在FHD或QHD下以最大的细节顺利运行所有最新的游戏。然而,在原生4K分辨率下和/或启用光线追踪时,情况可能会变得有点紧张,这在我们的基准测试中得到了证明。在这种情况下,Crysis Remastered,例如,下降到30 FPS大关以下。如果在必要时降低分辨率,热情的游戏玩家仍会对GS76 11UH的3D性能感到满意。

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-10875H
208.1 (190min - 220max) fps ∼100% +20%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H
197.1 fps ∼95% +13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (151 - 242, n=25)
193 fps ∼93% +11%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
175 (146min) fps ∼84% +1%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H
174 (141min) fps ∼84%
Average of class Gaming
  (42.1 - 242, n=154, last 2 years)
139 fps ∼67% -20%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H
112 fps ∼100% +19%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-10875H
108.3 (98min - 117max) fps ∼97% +15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (87.7 - 123, n=32)
106 fps ∼95% +13%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
97.9 (84min) fps ∼87% +4%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H
93.8 (75min) fps ∼84%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK
93.4 (80min) fps ∼83% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (24.3 - 123, n=196, last 2 years)
77.8 fps ∼69% -17%

我们用角色扮演游戏TheWitcher 3长达60分钟(FHD/Ultra),测试了图形性能在长时间内的表现。与CPU类似,GPU的性能在一段时间后也有一些下降,但我们不能说有重大的性能下降。

The Witcher 3 FPS diagram

0102030405060708090100110969695959596959596959595969595959596959595959595959595959595959595949495959595959595969595959695959595949595969495959596959494949695959595959695959595959595959696959696969596969596959695969696959695969695969696969695969695969596959695969696969596959596959695969695969596969695969596959695969695969595969596959695969596969596959695969596959596959596959696959696959695969695969696969596969696959696969695969696959695969595959595959595959595949494959695959594969594959595959595969496959695959695969595969495959596959596959595939595959595969595959595959595969595959595959595959595949595959595949595959495959495949594959594939494949594949494959495949495949595949595959495949595949594959595949495959595949595949594959594959495949595959495949595949495949595949594959495949594959495959495949494939594949594959494959494949594949494949494949494949495949494949494959494949494939493949394949494949394949393939494949394949394939394939393939493939494939394939493939493949393949393949394939393929393939393939392939392939292929293929393929392939393929393939293939293939293939293939392929393939293939392939293939293919293939293939392939392939293929291929293929392939293929292929392929292939292929292929292929293919292929292929291939292929292929292929292929292929293929292939292929293929292939292939293929392929392939293929392939293929392939292939293939293929392939392939392939292939293939293929393929393929392939293929293929392939293929392939392929392929293929293929393929393929392939293929393929393929492939393929393939392939393939393939393939393939393939393939393939392929393939393939393929393939393939392949293939393939293939292929492939393939393939393949393939393939493939394939393939493949393949393949394939493939393939393949394939394939394939393939493939493769190919091909190919091909190909091909090919190919091909190919091919091919191909191918990919191919191919192919191919192918990909089909090898990899089909089909090908990909090899090909190909091909190919190919191918991909191919191919091919291919291929192919291929191929192919291919292919091919291929292919192919292919291929192919291929291919292919192929191919192929192929192929192929291929291929292919291929292929291929292929192929192929291929292929291929292919292919191929291929291929192929192919292919292929192929291929191919192919292929192919291919191919091919291919191919191919191919192919291929192919292919291929192919192919291919192919192919192919192919192919291929192929191929291929192919291919191919091919291919191919191919091919191909191919191919191919191919090909191919191919191919191919191929292929291929292929292929292929292929192929292929293919392929192919292929292929392929292929292929292929292929391939292939292929293929392929392939392929392939392929393929392939392939293939293929392939293929293929393929392939293929293939292939291909191919091909091909192929291929192929192929192919291929191929191919291919191919191919191919190929190919191919092909293929392939392929192939292939292929392929292929392929193919292929292919292929292919292919291929192929192919292929291929293929392929392939292939293929293929293929293929293929292929291939292929192929292929292939292929292929292929392929392919291929393929292939292939292929392929292929292929192929192929192929291929292919292929292919292929192919192929292919291929292929392939293939293939293929392929394939494939493949393949394939493949394949394939493939393939393939393939393939393939393939493939393939393929393949393949493949393949393939392939393929393939393939293939393939