Notebookcheck Logo

Schenker Vision 14笔记本电脑回顾。现在还可以使用GeForce RTX 3050 Ti

英特尔H35四核CPU降低了Vision 14的速度... Schenker的Vision 14现在还可以使用更强大的35瓦处理器,默认情况下,这些处理器是用液态金属热化合物交付的。为了获得更多的GPU性能,你还可以选择GeForce RTX 3050 Ti,配备50瓦的TGP。但是,这在紧凑的机箱中是否真的能体面地工作?
GPU Geforce Laptop / Notebook Tiger Lake Ultrabook Thunderbolt Windows

我们审查了申克尔Vision 14配备15瓦的英特尔Tiger Lake 处理器,大约半年前。这个轻巧的设备在许多方面都很引人注目,也获得了89%的总体评价,非常好。在这个模型中已经很明显了(现在仍然可以买到),准备在机箱中加入一个更强大的冷却系统,增加一个风扇以及一个专用显卡。这就是我们现在审查的Vision 14的版本。

在价格方面,Vision 14起价1249欧元(约合1,402美元),配备H35处理器和iGPU (酷睿i5-11300H),比配备普通酷睿i5处理器(15瓦)但只提供全高清面板的Vision 14贵了250欧元(约合281美元)。90赫兹的高分辨率3K面板(2880x1800像素)只提供给H35型号,这里也是默认内置的。我们的测试配置配备了非常好的 酷睿i7-11370H处理器,以及 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti, 32GB内存,以及1TB PCIe 4.0固态硬盘,这也反映在其略高于2050欧元(约2301美元)的价格上。

在14英寸超极本领域,现在有一些机型采用了Tiger Lake H35 CPU(35瓦),但它们通常缺乏专用的GPU。然而,少数例外情况都是明显较重的机型,所以Vision 14在这个配置上其实没有任何直接竞争。喜欢Linux操作系统的用户应该看一下相同结构的InfinityBook Pro 14(配备酷睿i7-11370H和3K显示屏,起价1449欧元(约1627美元))。

SCHENKER Vision 14
Processor
Intel Core i7-11370H 4 x 3.3 - 4.8 GHz, 46 W PL2 / Short Burst, 40 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake-H35
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU - 4 GB VRAM, 35 W TDP ( including 15 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, Optimus
Memory
32 GB 
, DDR4-3200, dual-channel, 2 slots, max. 64 GB
Display
14.00 inch 16:10, 2880 x 1800 pixel 243 PPI, MNE007ZA1, IPS, glossy: no, 90 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Tiger Lake-UP3 PCH-LP
Storage
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, 1024 GB 
, 865 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Tiger Lake-U/Y PCH-LP - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm stereo audio jack, Card Reader: SD
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 15.6 x 308.8 x 215
Battery
53 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 90-watt PSU, Command Center, 36 Months Warranty
Weight
1.127 kg, Power Supply: 513 g
Price
2 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
87.7 %
01/2022
SCHENKER Vision 14
i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
1.1 kg15.6 mm14.00"2880x1800
86.9 %
10/2021
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.4 kg16.9 mm14.00"2880x1800
88.6 %
10/2021
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.4 kg16.7 mm14.20"2520x1680
85.5 %
04/2021
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
i7-1165G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
1.4 kg15.3 mm13.30"1920x1080
82.3 %
09/2021
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
i7-1185G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
1.3 kg16 mm14.00"3840x2160
89.1 %
SCHENKER Vision 14
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1 kg15.6 mm14.00"2880x1800

打开机箱后,你可以看到通过第二个风扇以及额外的热管改善了冷却效果。非常好的维护和升级选项,包括两个SODIMM插槽(最大64GB内存)和两个成熟的M.2 2280插槽(1个PCIe 4.0和1个PCIe 3.0 x2),以及可更换的WLAN模块,仍然存在于Vision 14的H35型号中。

Size comparison

319 mm 219 mm 16 mm 1.3 kg314 mm 230 mm 16.7 mm 1.4 kg312.4 mm 221.4 mm 16.9 mm 1.4 kg308.8 mm 215 mm 15.6 mm 1.1 kg308.8 mm 215 mm 15.6 mm 1 kg304.6 mm 210 mm 15.3 mm 1.4 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
左边:Kensington锁,USB-C 3.2 Gen. 2(DisplayPort 1.4,Power Delivery),USB-A 3.2 Gen. 1,SD读卡器,3.5毫米音频插孔
左边:Kensington锁,USB-C 3.2 Gen. 2(DisplayPort 1.4,Power Delivery),USB-A 3.2 Gen. 1,SD读卡器,3.5毫米音频插孔
右边。雷电4(DisplayPort 1.4,Power Delivery),HDMI 2.0b,USB-A 3.2 Gen. 1(供电),电源
右边。雷电4(DisplayPort 1.4,Power Delivery),HDMI 2.0b,USB-A 3.2 Gen. 1(供电),电源
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS (AV Pro V60)
164.4 MB/s +105%
SCHENKER Vision 14 (AV PRO V60)
80.7 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER Vision 14 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
80.1 MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook (18.9 - 193.9, n=17, last 2 years)
66.7 MB/s -17%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS (AV Pro V60)
182.4 MB/s +108%
SCHENKER Vision 14 (AV PRO V60)
87.6 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER Vision 14 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
87.6 MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook (23.6 - 239, n=17, last 2 years)
81.3 MB/s -7%

Legend

 
SCHENKER Vision 14 Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
 
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
 
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
 
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
 
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS Intel Core i7-1185G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
 
SCHENKER Vision 14 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1400 (1216min - 1530max) MBit/s +1%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1386 (1229min - 1460max) MBit/s
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1303 (653min - 1347max) MBit/s -6%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1775, n=324)
1161 MBit/s -16%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1084 (1013min - 1134max) MBit/s -22%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1011 (781min - 1084max) MBit/s -27%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
998 (787min - 1041max) MBit/s -28%
iperf3 receive AX12
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1617 (1531min - 1678max) MBit/s
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1542 (1327min - 1601max) MBit/s -5%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1486 (713min - 1549max) MBit/s -8%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1450 (1161min - 1555max) MBit/s -10%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1438 (1328min - 1521max) MBit/s -11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1311 (1144min - 1450max) MBit/s -19%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (136 - 1743, n=324)
1261 MBit/s -22%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650Tooltip
SCHENKER Vision 14; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1616 (1531-1678)
SCHENKER Vision 14; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1386 (1229-1460)
ColorChecker
20.3 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
19 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
25.2 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
12 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
ColorChecker SCHENKER Vision 14: 14.85 ∆E min: 2.75 - max: 25.18 ∆E

显示屏 - Vision 14 H35,采用哑光3K IPS面板

子像素网格
子像素网格
轻微的背光灯渗漏
轻微的背光灯渗漏

Vision 14 H35独家提供高分辨率3K面板(2880x1800像素),长宽比为16:10。哑光IPS面板的主观质量印象非常好,因为色彩鲜艳,内容清晰,明亮的表面看起来也没有颗粒感。由于较高的刷新率为90赫兹,动作看起来也很流畅,而且没有反应时间慢或PWM闪烁的问题。

该面板与之前评测中发现的视觉14机型相同,甚至我们的测量结果也只有很小的差别,尽管这仍然是在正常的系列变化范围内。亮度略高,平均为407cd/m²,黑色水平也更好一点。然而,肉眼并不能看到这种差异。

色彩再现在开箱后已经很不错了,但我们仍然能够通过自己的校准来改善色彩偏差(配置文件可在右边的方框中免费下载)。再加上几乎完全的sRGB覆盖,该面板也因此适合编辑图片/视频。

420
cd/m²
420
cd/m²
412
cd/m²
397
cd/m²
407
cd/m²
394
cd/m²
415
cd/m²
408
cd/m²
394
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
MNE007ZA1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 420 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 407.4 cd/m² Minimum: 18.4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 411 cd/m²
Contrast: 1628:1 (Black: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 2
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
75.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
74.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
SCHENKER Vision 14
MNE007ZA1, IPS, 2880x1800, 14.00
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
LEN140WQ+, IPS, 2880x1800, 14.00
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
CSOTT3 U17B MNE208ZA1-3, LTPS, 2520x1680, 14.20
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Sharp LQ133M1JW46, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
AU Optronics AUO123B, IPS, 3840x2160, 14.00
SCHENKER Vision 14
CSOT T3_MNE007ZA1_1, IPS, 2880x1800, 14.00
Display
2%
-5%
-7%
17%
1%
Display P3 Coverage
74.3
76.9
3%
67.8
-9%
66
-11%
87.5
18%
75.4
1%
sRGB Coverage
97.6
99.8
2%
98.3
1%
97.4
0%
100
2%
99
1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
75.7
76.7
1%
70.1
-7%
67.1
-11%
99.4
31%
76.4
1%
Response Times
-6%
-5%
-74%
-48%
4%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
40.4 ?(18.8, 21.6)
36.4 ?(18, 18.4)
10%
37.6 ?(18.8, 18.8)
7%
57.6 ?(26, 31.6)
-43%
52 ?(27.6, 24.4)
-29%
32.8 ?(15.6, 17.2)
19%
Response Time Black / White *
18.4 ?(6, 12.4)
22.4 ?(10, 12.4)
-22%
21.6 ?(10.8, 10.8)
-17%
37.6 ?(20.4, 17.2)
-104%
30.8 ?(17.6, 13.2)
-67%
20.4 ?(10, 10.4)
-11%
PWM Frequency
27780 ?(40)
Screen
-6%
13%
-5%
-37%
-8%
Brightness middle
407
410
1%
419
3%
356.8
-12%
593.3
46%
390
-4%
Brightness
407
395
-3%
407
0%
336
-17%
571
40%
387
-5%
Brightness Distribution
94
91
-3%
93
-1%
88
-6%
87
-7%
94
0%
Black Level *
0.25
0.29
-16%
0.23
8%
0.34
-36%
0.53
-112%
0.29
-16%
Contrast
1628
1414
-13%
1822
12%
1049
-36%
1119
-31%
1345
-17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.6
3.24
-25%
1.9
27%
1.63
37%
4.42
-70%
2.8
-8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.4
5.26
-20%
3.6
18%
5.03
-14%
7.16
-63%
4.4
-0%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
2
0.41
79%
0.9
55%
1.08
46%
4.3
-115%
1.8
10%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.7
4.2
-56%
2.9
-7%
3
-11%
3.2
-19%
3.5
-30%
Gamma
2.18 101%
2.18 101%
2.14 103%
2.23 99%
2.04 108%
2.24 98%
CCT
6316 103%
6012 108%
6733 97%
6434 101%
6737 96%
6174 105%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
62
76.4
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
97.6
99
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-3% / -4%
1% / 6%
-29% / -16%
-23% / -27%
-1% / -4%

* ... smaller is better

卡尔曼--灰鳞
卡尔曼--灰鳞
卡尔曼--饱和度
卡尔曼--饱和度
CalMAN - ColorChecker
CalMAN - ColorChecker
CalMAN - 校准了灰度
CalMAN - 校准了灰度
CalMAN - 饱和度校准
CalMAN - 饱和度校准
CalMAN - 校准了ColorChecker
CalMAN - 校准了ColorChecker
在阳光下
在阳光下
在阳光下
在阳光下
视角稳定性
视角稳定性

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
18.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 12.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.8 ms rise
↘ 21.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

性能 - Core i7-11370H和RTX 3050 Ti

英特尔的Tiger Lake H35 CPU本质上是具有四个核心(八个线程)的普通Tiger Lake 移动处理器,但它们只是消耗更多的电力。然而,我们在评论中经常看到,即使是普通的U系列CPU(如 酷睿i7-1165G7)在短时负载高峰期有时会以超过40瓦的功率运行。与英特尔提供更多CPU核心的45瓦处理器相比,H35 CPU使用更快的Iris Xe图形适配器。

因此,大多数笔记本电脑在使用H35 CPU时不使用专用GPU,这样你也能从更快的iGPU中获得一些好处。另一方面,将这些CPU与专用显卡结合起来,实际上意义不大,因为与45瓦的CPU相比,你牺牲了CPU的性能,而且不能充分利用快速的Iris Xe GPU。

然而,责备申克公司本身是不公平的,因为他们依赖于英特尔的可用芯片(由于供应瓶颈,AMD CPU无法使用)。由于与Tiger Lake U芯片共享相同的芯片组,生产H35芯片所需的开发工作相对较少,而且Vision 14也没有额外的GeForce GPU,所以在这种情况下,处理器确实有意义。然而,在我们看来,同样的性能可以用一个普通的 酷睿i7-1165G7酷睿i7-1185G7如果后者也配备了液态金属热化合物和更强的冷却功能。

测试条件

视觉14的第一个评测样本在预装的控制中心,两个基本配置文件(安静和性能)再次可用,同时还有三个子文件,我们在下表中列出了这些文件。

概况 CPU负载 GPU负载 CPU+GPU综合负载
静音20分贝 10瓦 25瓦 CPU:10瓦
GPU:25

静音30分贝 13瓦 32瓦 CPU:13瓦
GPU:25

静音40分贝 15瓦 35瓦 CPU:15瓦
GPU。35瓦
性能平衡 46 -> 20瓦 50瓦 CPU:20瓦
GPU。40瓦
性能爱好者 46 -> 40 瓦 50 瓦 CPU:35->25瓦
GPU。35瓦
Performance Overboost 46 -> 40瓦 50瓦 CPU:35 -> 30瓦GPU:35瓦。35 -> 30瓦
GPU。35瓦






在我们之前对Vision 14的评测中,我们使用了性能平衡配置,但是额外的显卡使默认设置发生了轻微的转变。使用性能平衡,CPU的功率现在被限制在几秒钟后只有20瓦(即使在GeForce GPU不运行的情况下),这甚至使CPU的性能明显下降到Vision 14中的Core i7-1165G7的水平以下(在恒定负载下@CBR15 Multi低约12%);因此,我们在基准测试和测量中默认使用性能爱好者配置文件,它提供一个更好的CPU和GPU性能的平衡。然而,我们也将看看其他配置文件在个别类别中的效果。

处理器

ǞǞǞ英特尔酷睿i7-11370H基于Tiger Lake ,提供四个核心(八个线程),当所有四个核心都处于活动状态时,时钟速度可达4.8 GHz或4.3 GHz。最初,该处理器在多核基准测试中以高达46瓦的功率运行,然后稳定在40瓦。这些结果原则上是好的,但是CPU的性能由于核心数量少而不必要地减慢了。最后,Vision 14 H35并没有比配备i7-1165的Vision 14领先太多。 配备i7-1165G7的Vision 14.即使是 愿景15中,酷睿i7-1165G7在可比的功率限制(50/40瓦)下运行,也只是略微慢一些。尽管如此,英特尔的四核CPU在与现代AMD处理器(如Ryzen 7 5800U)的竞争中并不占优势。Ryzen 7 5800U中的ThinkBook 13s(这里以更低的功率限制运行)。结合专用的GeForce GPU,一个有六个或八个核心的节流处理器(45瓦级,例如: 酷睿i5-11400H酷睿i7-11800H)会更有意义。

在电池供电的情况下,性能被限制在25瓦,这导致在Multi测试中的性能下降约15%。酷睿i7-11370H的进一步基准测试可以在我们的 CPU基准测试文章.

Cinebench R15 Multi endurance test

01002003004005006007008009001000110012001300140015001600170018001900Tooltip
SCHENKER Vision 14 Intel Core i7-11370H; Performance Enthusiast: Ø1053 (1030.18-1070.35)
SCHENKER Vision 14 Intel Core i7-11370H; Performance Balanced: Ø770 (751.09-876.81)
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Intel Core i7-11370H: Ø1020 (1012.38-1037.83)
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 Intel Core i7-11370H: Ø1038 (1027.19-1054.52)
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø813 (791.78-824.28)
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS Intel Core i7-1185G7: Ø866 (752.53-901.65)
SCHENKER Vision 14 Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø886 (876-943.04)
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE AMD Ryzen 7 5800U; max. Performance: Ø1583 (1402.03-1924.93)
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE AMD Ryzen 7 5800U: Ø1501 (1244.94-1690.47)
在CB R15多重循环期间的CPU测量值(红色:性能爱好者,绿色:性能平衡)。
在CB R15多重循环期间的CPU测量值(红色:性能爱好者,绿色:性能平衡)。
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Average of class Subnotebook
 
81.5 pt
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
71.7 pt
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
65.4 pt
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
64 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 -2!
Intel Core i7-11370H
61.6 pt
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7
60.7 pt
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
 
59.1 pt
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q -2!
Intel Core i7-1165G7
54.7 pt
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS -2!
Intel Core i7-1185G7
54.3 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2485 - 16201, n=68, last 2 years)
10289 Points +74%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
8068 Points +37%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H
6646 (6493.56min - 6646.41max) Points +13%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
6612 Points +12%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
5904 Points
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5878 Points 0%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7
5761 (5360.29min - 5761.28max) Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (3696 - 6646, n=12)
5563 Points -6%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Average of class Subnotebook
  (598 - 1934, n=68, last 2 years)
1627 Points +11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H
1553 Points +6%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
1518 Points +3%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1515 Points +3%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7
1485 Points +1%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (1081 - 1556, n=11)
1469 Points 0%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
1467 Points
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
1430 Points -3%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Subnotebook
  (810 - 6314, n=64, last 2 years)
3963 Points +69%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
2995 Points +27%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
2578 Points +10%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H
2548 Points +8%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
2351 Points
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7
2238 Points -5%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7
2235 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (1438 - 2578, n=11)
2146 Points -9%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Intel Core i7-1165G7
2025 Points -14%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Subnotebook
  (216 - 738, n=64, last 2 years)
610 Points +3%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
595 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H
592 Points -1%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
590 Points -1%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7
582 Points -2%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7
580 Points -3%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Intel Core i7-1165G7
569 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (475 - 601, n=11)
566 Points -5%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
560 Points -6%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
1925 Points +80%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
1691 Points +58%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (514 - 2581, n=70, last 2 years)
1757 Points +64%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
1070 (1030.18min - 1070.35max) Points
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
877 (1030.18min - 1070.35max) Points -18%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
1055 (1027.19min - 1054.52max) Points -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H
1038 (1012.38min - 1037.83max) Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (606 - 1086, n=17)
946 Points -12%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7
943 (876min - 943.04max) Points -12%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7
902 (752.53min - 901.65max) Points -16%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Intel Core i7-1165G7
824 (791.78min - 824.28max) Points -23%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook
  (91.8 - 280, n=62, last 2 years)
237 Points +2%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
233 Points 0%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
232 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H
229 Points -1%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
229 Points -1%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7
225 Points -3%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7
224 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (162.9 - 233, n=15)
220 Points -5%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Intel Core i7-1165G7
219 Points -6%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Intel Core i7-1165G7
575 Seconds * -27%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (432 - 762, n=11)
531 Seconds * -18%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7
525 Seconds * -16%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7
524 Seconds * -16%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
461 Seconds * -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H
458 Seconds * -2%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
451 Seconds *
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
391 Seconds * +13%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (201 - 1600, n=66, last 2 years)
386 Seconds * +14%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Subnotebook
  (16223 - 67444, n=57, last 2 years)
44459 MIPS +56%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
39618 MIPS +39%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
28520 MIPS 0%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
28410 MIPS
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7
25894 MIPS -9%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (18961 - 28520, n=11)
25340 MIPS -11%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7
24339 MIPS -14%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H
23914 MIPS -16%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Intel Core i7-1165G7
23460 MIPS -17%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
5550 MIPS
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5408 MIPS -3%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
5352 MIPS -4%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2197 - 6403, n=58, last 2 years)
5328 MIPS -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H
5317 MIPS -4%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (5074 - 5550, n=11)
5290 MIPS -5%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
5285 MIPS -5%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5217 MIPS -6%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7
5036 MIPS -9%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Subnotebook
  (4274 - 12580, n=65, last 2 years)
9084 Points +57%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
6995 Points +21%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
5985 Points +4%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
5775 Points
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5586 Points -3%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5441 Points -6%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (3828 - 6115, n=10)
5258 Points -9%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average of class Subnotebook
  (672 - 2350, n=65, last 2 years)
1701 Points +6%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
1601 Points
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
1588 Points -1%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1579 Points -1%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1551 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (1376 - 1607, n=10)
1540 Points -4%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
1436 Points -10%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1.5 - 19.4, n=56, last 2 years)
11.9 fps +35%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
9.68 fps +10%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
8.82 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H
8.6 fps -2%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
8.51 fps -4%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7
7.46 fps -15%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (4.98 - 8.82, n=11)
7.24 fps -18%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Intel Core i7-1165G7
6.95 fps -21%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7
6.81 fps -23%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7
59.3 s * -24%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (40.1 - 120.5, n=57, last 2 years)
52.6 s * -10%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
50.9 s * -6%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Intel Core i7-1165G7
48.9 s * -2%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
47.9 s *
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H
47.5 s * +1%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (23.6 - 56.5, n=11)
45.9 s * +4%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7
45.6 s * +5%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
43.8 s * +9%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7
0.579 sec * -6%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7
0.569 sec * -5%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Intel Core i7-1165G7
0.568 sec * -4%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (0.544 - 0.596, n=11)
0.564 sec * -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H
0.552 sec * -1%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
0.549 sec * -1%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
0.546 sec * -0%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
0.544 sec *
Average of class Subnotebook
  (0.4397 - 1.236, n=57, last 2 years)
0.52 sec * +4%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
877 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
144 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
232 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, Vega 8
93.9 pt
Average of class Subnotebook
 
81.3 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
67.9 pt
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
65.6 pt
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
65.3 pt
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
61.6 pt
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
 
59.5 pt
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
58.8 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, Vega 8
11518 KRay/s +37%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (343 - 25961, n=57, last 2 years)
10054 KRay/s +20%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
8413 KRay/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
8256 KRay/s -2%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
7906 KRay/s -6%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
7596 KRay/s -10%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (5204 - 8413, n=10)
7260 KRay/s -14%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
7115 KRay/s -15%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, Vega 8
72406 Points +113%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (11867 - 111109, n=57, last 2 years)
52488 Points +54%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
34020 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
33876 Points 0%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
32822 Points -4%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
31224 Points -8%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (23958 - 34020, n=10)
30771 Points -10%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
30267 Points -11%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, Vega 8
2484 MB/s +9%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (453 - 4646, n=57, last 2 years)
2361 MB/s +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
2289 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
2287 MB/s
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
2217 MB/s -3%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
2124 MB/s -7%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (1656 - 2297, n=10)
2074 MB/s -9%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
1992 MB/s -13%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, Vega 8
83872 Points +59%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (15447 - 115300, n=57, last 2 years)
79878 Points +51%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
52912 Points 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
52840 Points 0%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
52839 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (42086 - 52930, n=10)
50786 Points -4%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
50522 Points -4%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
49853 Points -6%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, Vega 8
10938 Points +118%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1223 - 14944, n=57, last 2 years)
7617 Points +52%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
5027 Points 0%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
5025 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
5023 Points 0%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
4795 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (3755 - 5027, n=10)
4736 Points -6%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
4729 Points -6%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, Vega 8
40544 Points +99%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (6379 - 59053, n=57, last 2 years)
27533 Points +35%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
20417 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
20380 Points 0%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
19648 Points -4%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
18719 Points -8%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
18385 Points -10%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (14433 - 20417, n=10)
18332 Points -10%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, Vega 8
101120 MB/s +32%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
76866 MB/s 0%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
76840 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
76839 MB/s
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
73297 MB/s -5%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (44267 - 76866, n=10)
68494 MB/s -11%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (638 - 161430, n=57, last 2 years)
53217 MB/s -31%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
39869 MB/s -48%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Subnotebook
  (270 - 1123, n=57, last 2 years)
666 MB/s +58%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, Vega 8
665 MB/s +58%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
422 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
419 MB/s -1%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
416 MB/s -1%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
392 MB/s -7%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (289 - 422, n=10)
377 MB/s -11%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
343 MB/s -19%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, Vega 8
5939 KRay/s +30%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (204 - 14018, n=57, last 2 years)
5239 KRay/s +15%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
4551 KRay/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
4483 KRay/s -1%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
4308 KRay/s -5%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
4036 KRay/s -11%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (2756 - 4551, n=10)
3927 KRay/s -14%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
3887 KRay/s -15%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
42474 MPixel/s +52%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
40069 MPixel/s +43%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
35883 MPixel/s +28%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (7622 - 53954, n=57, last 2 years)
35760 MPixel/s +28%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
30567 MPixel/s +9%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (15892 - 40069, n=10)
28235 MPixel/s +1%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
27992 MPixel/s
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, Vega 8
16417 MPixel/s -41%

系统性能

Vision 14给人留下了非常好的总体性能印象。在实践中几乎没有等待时间,所有的命令都是在没有任何延迟的情况下执行的。我们的评测样本也可以在PCMark 10的合成测试中处于比较领域的顶端。

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Subnotebook
  (4384 - 7428, n=55, last 2 years)
5879 Points +1%
SCHENKER Vision 14
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5838 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (5538 - 5838, n=2)
5688 Points -3%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i7-1165G7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
5549 Points -5%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
5419 Points -7%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
5328 Points -9%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i7-1185G7, Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
5325 Points -9%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5104 Points -13%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
10531 Points +14%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
10368 Points +12%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (8890 - 11168, n=55, last 2 years)
10247 Points +11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
10191 Points +10%
SCHENKER Vision 14
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9234 Points
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i7-1165G7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
9218 Points 0%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i7-1185G7, Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
9025 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (8715 - 9234, n=2)
8975 Points -3%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
SCHENKER Vision 14
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
8806 Points
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i7-1165G7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
8682 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (8342 - 8806, n=2)
8574 Points -3%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i7-1185G7, Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
8088 Points -8%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (6213 - 10279, n=55, last 2 years)
7857 Points -11%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
7082 Points -20%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
6911 Points -22%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6807 Points -23%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Subnotebook
  (4093 - 9749, n=55, last 2 years)
6923 Points +4%
SCHENKER Vision 14
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6641 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (6343 - 6641, n=2)
6492 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
5828 Points -12%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i7-1165G7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
5795 Points -13%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
5790 Points -13%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i7-1185G7, Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
5616 Points -15%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5114 Points -23%
CrossMark / Overall
Average of class Subnotebook
  (718 - 1876, n=61, last 2 years)
1553 Points +3%
SCHENKER Vision 14
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1502 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1407 - 1502, n=2)
1455 Points -3%
CrossMark / Productivity
SCHENKER Vision 14
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1555 Points
Average of class Subnotebook
  (685 - 1829, n=61, last 2 years)
1507 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1417 - 1555, n=2)
1486 Points -4%
CrossMark / Creativity
Average of class Subnotebook
  (776 - 2210, n=61, last 2 years)
1690 Points +16%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1452 - 1472, n=2)
1462 Points +1%
SCHENKER Vision 14
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1452 Points
CrossMark / Responsiveness
SCHENKER Vision 14
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1501 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1202 - 1501, n=2)
1352 Points -10%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (652 - 1899, n=61, last 2 years)
1329 Points -11%
PCMark 10 Score
5838 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
64524 MB/s +40%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
61355 MB/s +33%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (22781 - 95353, n=57, last 2 years)
61239 MB/s +33%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
57441 MB/s +25%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (32035 - 64524, n=10)
46184 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
46072 MB/s
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
41477 MB/s -10%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
62417 MB/s +30%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
60212 MB/s +26%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
57348 MB/s +20%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (23831 - 86433, n=57, last 2 years)
57245 MB/s +20%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
48380 MB/s +1%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (37216 - 62417, n=10)
48210 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
47864 MB/s
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
65610 MB/s +42%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (23474 - 93382, n=57, last 2 years)
64603 MB/s +40%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
62732 MB/s +36%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
58664 MB/s +27%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (36920 - 65610, n=10)
48631 MB/s +5%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
46199 MB/s
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
44549 MB/s -4%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average of class Subnotebook
  (18.8 - 172, n=52, last 2 years)
104 ns * -42%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
95.9 ns * -31%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
91.3 ns * -24%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (73.4 - 103, n=10)
89.5 ns * -22%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
89.1 ns * -21%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
73.4 ns *
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
71.4 ns * +3%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

在我们的标准化延迟测试中,Vision 14在目前的BIOS下显示出略微升高的延迟,这使得它对于实时音频应用来说是不理想的。然而,在播放4K YouTube视频时,没有出现丢帧。

LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i7-1165G7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
1157 μs * -10%
SCHENKER Vision 14
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1052 μs *
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i7-1185G7, Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
1032 μs * +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
796 μs * +24%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
739 μs * +30%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
577 μs * +45%

* ... smaller is better

储存

Vision 14提供两个M.2 2280 SSD插槽(1个PCIe 4.0,1个PCIe 3.0 x2)。默认情况下,安装了存储容量为250GB的三星970 Evo,但在配置器中有许多选项可供选择。例如,我们的评测设备中包括一个存储容量为1TB的三星980 Pro(首次启动后免费提供865GB),但需要额外收费157欧元(约175美元)。980 Pro可以利用快速的PCIe 4.0接口,并且实现了非常好的传输速率。第二个插槽的速度有限(PCIe 3.0 x2,最大约1750 MB/s),但在需要时,它仍然非常有用,可以轻松扩展存储容量。进一步的SSD基准测试可在 这里.

Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7031 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5224 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 798 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 538 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 94.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 253.4 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 1399 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 2563 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
92.7 pt
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
 
86 pt
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
83.2 pt
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
60.6 pt
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
55.8 pt
Average of class Subnotebook
 
54.9 pt
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
48.3 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
46 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4315 (4271.27min - 4314.68max) MB/s
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4277 (4263.3min - 4277.19max) MB/s -1%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (2659 - 4315, n=26)
3877 MB/s -10%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (452 - 4501, n=58, last 2 years)
2872 MB/s -33%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
2565 (2469.49min - 2565.24max) MB/s -41%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
2280 (2250.87min - 2280.29max) MB/s -47%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
2273 (2266.68min - 2272.96max) MB/s -47%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2012 (1880.94min - 2012.47max) MB/s -53%
seq write
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4326 (4303.78min - 4326.21max) MB/s
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4259 (4236.16min - 4258.69max) MB/s -2%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (2839 - 4493, n=26)
3893 MB/s -10%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (153.3 - 5344, n=58, last 2 years)
2808 MB/s -35%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
2402 (2383.83min - 2401.68max) MB/s -44%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
2214 (2135.03min - 2214.17max) MB/s -49%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2139 (2070.52min - 2139.18max) MB/s -51%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
1966 (1910.25min - 1966.34max) MB/s -55%
seq q8 t1 read
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6701 (6057.41min - 6701.03max) MB/s
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6677 (5948min - 6677.19max) MB/s 0%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (3227 - 6902, n=26)
6544 MB/s -2%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
4959 (4547.18min - 4958.86max) MB/s -26%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (558 - 7134, n=58, last 2 years)
4958 MB/s -26%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
3528 (3329.91min - 3527.69max) MB/s -47%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
3511 (3101.99min - 3511.16max) MB/s -48%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
3418 (2985.39min - 3417.94max) MB/s -49%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4955 (4937.74min - 4955.15max) MB/s
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4951 (4941.91min - 4951.12max) MB/s 0%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (3184 - 5087, n=26)
4879 MB/s -2%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (60 - 6751, n=58, last 2 years)
3775 MB/s -24%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
3103 (3013.76min - 3103.07max) MB/s -37%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
2947 (2941.66min - 2946.92max) MB/s -41%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
2409 (2393.48min - 2409max) MB/s -51%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
2292 (2284.17min - 2292.43max) MB/s -54%
4k q1 t1 read
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
94.2 (93.47min - 94.2max) MB/s
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
92.2 (92.1min - 92.22max) MB/s -2%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (61.1 - 94.3, n=26)
79.9 MB/s -15%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (12.6 - 88.6, n=58, last 2 years)
61.6 MB/s -35%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
57.4 (57.27min - 57.4max) MB/s -39%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
54.5 (54.23min - 54.48max) MB/s -42%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
46.9 (46.21min - 46.87max) MB/s -50%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
36.4 (36.16min - 36.36max) MB/s -61%
4k q1 t1 write
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
256 (252.87min - 256.05max) MB/s +4%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
247 (244.59min - 247.11max) MB/s
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
238 (236.71min - 237.74max) MB/s -4%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (132.2 - 311, n=26)
217 MB/s -12%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
214 (211.68min - 214.1max) MB/s -13%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (22.5 - 360, n=58, last 2 years)
154.8 MB/s -37%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
140 (137.27min - 139.65max) MB/s -43%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
136 (135.56min - 136.18max) MB/s -45%
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3297 (3266.49min - 3297.01max) MB/s
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (895 - 4483, n=26)
3197 MB/s -3%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2810 (2724.15min - 2809.5max) MB/s -15%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
1635 (1546.79min - 1634.82max) MB/s -50%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
1268 (1247.21min - 1268.12max) MB/s -62%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
1261 (1257.74min - 1260.86max) MB/s -62%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (283 - 4286, n=58, last 2 years)
1215 MB/s -63%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
1150 (1137.9min - 1149.84max) MB/s -65%
4k q32 t16 write
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2416 (2058.59min - 2415.65max) MB/s +151%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (345 - 4383, n=26)
2341 MB/s +143%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
2085 (107.27min - 2085.29max) MB/s +116%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
1071 (786min - 1070.93max) MB/s +11%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
964 (961.85min - 964.1max) MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook
  (157 - 4189, n=58, last 2 years)
869 MB/s -10%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
519 (498.27min - 519.16max) MB/s -46%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
478 (469.71min - 477.63max) MB/s -50%
AS SSD
Score Total
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
7939 Points +38%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (3394 - 9322, n=24)
7334 Points +27%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5763 Points
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
5069 Points -12%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (707 - 8892, n=56, last 2 years)
4437 Points -23%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
4316 Points -25%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
4102 Points -29%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
3541 Points -39%
Score Read
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3512 Points +20%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2920 Points
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (1501 - 3512, n=24)
2811 Points -4%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
1780 Points -39%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
1597 Points -45%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
1480 Points -49%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (253 - 3307, n=56, last 2 years)
1464 Points -50%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
1462 Points -50%
Score Write
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (1130 - 4194, n=24)
3159 Points +124%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2677 Points +90%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
2450 Points +74%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (327 - 3972, n=56, last 2 years)
2285 Points +62%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
2130 Points +51%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
1899 Points +34%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1412 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
1188 Points -16%
Seq Read
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5367 MB/s
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4899 MB/s -9%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (545 - 5692, n=24)
4838 MB/s -10%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
3845 MB/s -28%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (508 - 5525, n=56, last 2 years)
3827 MB/s -29%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
2961 MB/s -45%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2775 MB/s -48%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
2353 MB/s -56%
Seq Write
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3955 MB/s
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3952 MB/s 0%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (1613 - 4136, n=24)
3490 MB/s -12%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (386 - 4961, n=56, last 2 years)
2355 MB/s -40%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
2283 MB/s -42%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
2098 MB/s -47%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
1625 MB/s -59%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
1436 MB/s -64%
4K Read
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
83.8 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
83.6 MB/s
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (53.5 - 86.8, n=24)
72 MB/s -14%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (14.8 - 96.2, n=56, last 2 years)
59.4 MB/s -29%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
57.5 MB/s -31%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
54.3 MB/s -35%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
53 MB/s -37%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
49.34 MB/s -41%
4K Write
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
205.3 MB/s
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
205 MB/s 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
198.3 MB/s -3%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
189.3 MB/s -8%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (134.6 - 254, n=24)
188.8 MB/s -8%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
186.9 MB/s -9%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (65.5 - 256, n=56, last 2 years)
173.2 MB/s -16%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
78.5 MB/s -62%
4K-64 Read
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2938 MB/s +28%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2300 MB/s
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (915 - 2938, n=24)
2234 MB/s -3%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
1341 MB/s -42%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
1270 MB/s -45%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
1169 MB/s -49%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
1131 MB/s -51%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (187.3 - 2682, n=56, last 2 years)
1022 MB/s -56%
4K-64 Write
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (557 - 3708, n=24)
2622 MB/s +223%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
2143 MB/s +164%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2077 MB/s +156%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (223 - 3410, n=56, last 2 years)
1873 MB/s +131%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
1778 MB/s +119%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
1502 MB/s +85%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
846 MB/s +4%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
811 MB/s
Access Time Read
Average of class Subnotebook
  (0.021 - 0.257, n=56, last 2 years)
0.06214 ms * -159%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
0.05 ms * -108%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
0.049 ms * -104%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
0.046 ms * -92%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (0.022 - 0.073, n=24)
0.04075 ms * -70%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
0.029 ms * -21%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.025 ms * -4%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.024 ms *
Access Time Write
Average of class Subnotebook
  (0.016 - 0.523, n=56, last 2 years)
0.07618 ms * -281%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
0.058 ms * -190%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
0.054 ms * -170%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
0.041 ms * -105%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (0.018 - 0.089, n=24)
0.03363 ms * -68%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
0.026 ms * -30%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.02 ms * -0%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.02 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

033567010051340167520102345268030153350368540204355469050255360569560306365Tooltip
SCHENKER Vision 14: Ø5286 (4963.12-6692.85)

图形卡

GPU-ZGeForce RTX 3050 Ti
GPU-ZGeForce RTX 3050 Ti

除了集成的Iris Xe Graphics G7(96 EUs),我们的审查样本还配备了专用的 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti.这是50瓦的版本,其中基本值为35瓦,另外15瓦的动态提升由处理器提供(这在性能档案中也很明显)。因此,基本上,这是RTX 3050 Ti的一个慢速版本(TGP范围在35至80瓦之间)。在我们的基准测试中,RTX 3050 Ti的最大时钟速率为1,402 MHz,但之后通常很快就会稳定在~1,200 MHz。

因此,基准测试中的性能仍然比我们数据库中的RTX 3050 Ti的平均速率落后约15%。与iGPU版本的相比 视觉14,优势显然是明显的,特别是当你喜欢玩游戏的时候。此外,即使在长时间的会议中,性能也保持稳定,因为苛刻的Time Spy 压力测试很容易完成,达到98.2%。然而,游戏不可能靠电池供电,因为GPU的功耗被大量限制在12.5瓦,使得TheWitcher 3无法播放,例如(插入@Ultra设置时5 FPS与41 FPS)。你可以找到进一步的GPU基准测试 这里.

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
 
100 pt
SCHENKER Vision 14
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11370H
89.2 pt
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-1165G7
66.5 pt
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-1185G7
61.1 pt
Average of class Subnotebook
 
44 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-11370H
38.9 pt
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-11370H
37.7 pt
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
34.1 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (7952 - 20905, n=27)
17562 Points +9%
SCHENKER Vision 14
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11370H
16128 Points
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-1165G7
12199 Points -24%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-1185G7
11538 Points -28%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2979 - 16904, n=55, last 2 years)
8227 Points -49%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-11370H
7115 Points -56%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-11370H
6994 Points -57%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
6624 Points -59%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (7917 - 15611, n=26)
13090 Points +18%
SCHENKER Vision 14
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11370H
11055 Points
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-1165G7
8743 Points -21%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-1185G7
8114 Points -27%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2837 - 12349, n=59, last 2 years)
6026 Points -45%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-11370H
5652 Points -49%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-11370H
5327 Points -52%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
4795 Points -57%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (3744 - 6122, n=27)
5177 Points +10%
SCHENKER Vision 14
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11370H
4721 Points
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-1165G7
3276 Points -31%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-1185G7
2886 Points -39%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (811 - 4773, n=58, last 2 years)
2027 Points -57%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-11370H
1709 Points -64%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-11370H
1688 Points -64%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
1441 Points -69%
3DMark 11 Performance
15201 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
22441 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
9856 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
4842 points
Help

The Witcher 3 FPS diagram

0510152025303540Tooltip
SCHENKER Vision 14 i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø41.4 (39-43)
在玩《大话西游》时,CPU和GPU的数据Witcher 3
在玩《大话西游》时,CPU和GPU的数据Witcher 3
low med. high ultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 163 154 104 52.2 35.7
The Witcher 3 (2015) 205 112 73 41.4
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 148 132 117 113
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 110 58.3 40.8 29
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 98.3 88.3 75.7
Far Cry 5 (2018) 110 71 64 59 40
Strange Brigade (2018) 232 110 89.4 76.7 57.2
F1 2021 (2021) 207 125 97.1 46.8 30.9

排放 - 愿景14,带响亮的风扇

噪声排放

原则上,Vision 14 H35是一个相对较高的副笔记本,但你至少可以通过各种性能配置确保风扇在低负荷时保持关闭。然而,想要释放设备的全部性能的用户,例如在游戏时,将不得不面对大约45 dB(A),在压力测试中噪音水平甚至接近50 dB(A)。风扇的频率不是很高,但你自然能听到噪音。这就是为什么我们建议在游戏时戴上耳机。我们也检测不到任何其他电子噪音,如线圈啸叫。

概况 运行时的风扇噪音Witcher 3 Ultra 压力测试时的风扇噪音
安静20分贝 33.9 dB(A) 33.1 dB(A)
安静30分贝 40.9分贝(A) 33.1分贝(A)
静音40分贝 40.9分贝(A) 40.3分贝(A)
性能平衡型 44.6 dB(A) 46.6 dB(A)
高性能爱好者 44.6 dB(A) 49.5 dB(A)
性能过强 46.6 dB(A) 51.9 dB(A)

Noise Level

Idle
24.3 / 24.3 / 25.9 dB(A)
Load
43.3 / 49.5 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24.3 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.631.631.833.333.832.62534.431.629.73231.234.43125.831.32526.327.525.84029.831.331.827.330.529.85027.628.131.227.128.227.66325.227.426.224.524.825.28023.725.423.720.218.723.710028.521.422.32020.528.512522.423.121.818.818.322.416022.721.320.417.716.322.720025.522.422.619.41825.525025.623.622.821.817.825.631526.123.823.617.515.226.140031.227.925.715.613.131.250033.229.127.614.711.933.263034.23028.415.11334.280034.429.928.713.41034.4100035.831.930.613.410.635.8125036.532.931.113.11136.516003834.232.613.211.838200038.933.632.613.111.638.925004135.534.514.111.541315040.135.633.213.611.640.1400038.83431.612.61238.8500036.530.430.112.812.436.5630037.129.730.413.112.737.180003427.127.712.812.8341000030.622.724.312.812.830.61250026.92225.813.31326.91600021.623.127.51413.121.6SPL49.544.643.325.924.349.5N6.64.64.20.80.66.6median 34median 29.1median 27.7median 13.6median 12.8median 34Delta5.94.94.11.91.45.9hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseSCHENKER Vision 14
SCHENKER Vision 14
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i7-1165G7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i7-1185G7, Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
SCHENKER Vision 14
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
Noise
9%
7%
-1%
-2%
3%
off / environment *
24.3
24.6
-1%
24.3
-0%
25.3
-4%
23.9
2%
25
-3%
Idle Minimum *
24.3
24.7
-2%
24.3
-0%
25.3
-4%
24.2
-0%
25
-3%
Idle Average *
24.3
24.7
-2%
24.3
-0%
25.3
-4%
24.2
-0%
25
-3%
Idle Maximum *
25.9
24.7
5%
28.4
-10%
27
-4%
24.2
7%
26.9
-4%
Load Average *
43.3
30.8
29%
31.7
27%
47.9
-11%
50.2
-16%
38.6
11%
Witcher 3 ultra *
44.6
33
26%
31.7
29%
38.4
14%
47
-5%
41.2
8%
Load Maximum *
49.5
46.4
6%
46.8
5%
45.9
7%
51.7
-4%
41.2
17%

* ... smaller is better

温度

非常轻薄的外壳和强大的组件相结合,导致表面温度很高。在低负载情况下,你已经可以感觉到轻微的温度上升,但应该明确指出,在日常使用中没有任何限制。然而,在游戏或运行高要求的应用程序时,你不应该把设备放在腿上,因为我们可以在底部测量到超过50℃(约122°F)的温度。在负载情况下,顶部也会大幅升温。在其他性能模式下,温度仍然大致相当,因为风扇的行为在这里也有变化。

我们使用三个性能配置文件进行了压力测试,结果在下面的截图中清晰可见。在几分钟后数值趋于平稳后,它们仍然完全稳定。

压力测试期间的CPU和GPU数据(红色。性能爱好者,绿色。性能平衡,蓝色。性能过强)
压力测试期间的CPU和GPU数据(红色。性能爱好者,绿色。性能平衡,蓝色。性能过强)
Max. Load
 46.9 °C49.7 °C45.2 °C 
 41.8 °C47.4 °C40.6 °C 
 27.9 °C28.1 °C29.1 °C 
Maximum: 49.7 °C
Average: 39.6 °C
46.9 °C56 °C48.6 °C
38.4 °C52.3 °C41.7 °C
30.9 °C33.8 °C33.2 °C
Maximum: 56 °C
Average: 42.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  46.3 °C | Room Temperature 20.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.7 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.3 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.1 °C / 84.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-0.8 °C / -1.5 F).
表面温度 - 压力测试(顶部)
表面温度 - 压力测试(顶部)
表面温度 - 压力测试(底部)
表面温度 - 压力测试(底部)
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Heat
19%
15%
-1%
-9%
-1%
Maximum Upper Side *
49.7
39.4
21%
41.1
17%
44
11%
49.4
1%
46.2
7%
Maximum Bottom *
56
51.4
8%
45.4
19%
47.4
15%
60.6
-8%
52.2
7%
Idle Upper Side *
28.8
21.6
25%
25.3
12%
32.2
-12%
30.6
-6%
30.6
-6%
Idle Bottom *
30.6
24.6
20%
26.5
13%
36
-18%
37.4
-22%
33.6
-10%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.835.12528.331.53135.234.54033.631.25035.136.56324.825.98024.62410026.926.712520.9251601835.820020.744.32502146.53151551.740013.556.250013.459.46301364.580012.863.710001363.2125012.763.9160011.664.7200011.465.1250011.765.831501265.9400012.460.6500012.352.4630012.660800012.661.81000012.661.11250012.558.31600011.851.9SPL2575.2N0.735.2median 12.7median 60Delta1.78.731.730.933.13425.834.727.635.329.33528.735.923.142.318.253.52055.819.456.818.96420.967.114.267.412.466.111.967.212.57510.878.810.975.310.873.311.569.311.269.411.369.511.671.21270.212.468.512.369.912.572.812.465.612.462.211.955.724.384.10.663.6median 12.4median 68.51.54hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSCHENKER Vision 14Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
SCHENKER Vision 14 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei MateBook 14s i7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理 - 3K面板消耗了大量的电池寿命

能源消耗

在低负载情况下,功耗略高于第一款Vision 14评测设备的情况。 第一个Vision 14评测单元.虽然显示器的最大亮度略高,但我们推测Windows 11是造成较高消耗的原因。就像第一个Vision 14一样,高分辨率面板需要大量的电力。

自然,由于专用显卡的存在,负载下的消耗要高得多。我们甚至在压力测试开始时登记了110瓦的功率。只有在四分钟后,消耗才稳定在90瓦,这是电源适配器的额定容量。因此,一个更强大的电源适配器肯定仍会提供一些空间。

与之前的评测设备一样,我们再次注意到这里的高待机消耗。Schenker应该在这方面进一步努力,因为目前你必须准备好在长时间待机时(如过夜)有明显的电池损耗。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.31 / 2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 6.7 / 12.6 / 15.4 Watt
Load midlight 85.7 / 110.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
SCHENKER Vision 14
i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2880x1800, 14.00
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00, IPS, 2880x1800, 14.00
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, LTPS, 2520x1680, 14.20
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
i7-1165G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
i7-1185G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162, IPS, 3840x2160, 14.00
SCHENKER Vision 14
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2880x1800, 14.00
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
 
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Power Consumption
40%
37%
22%
-17%
17%
-13%
36%
Idle Minimum *
6.7
4.8
28%
4.4
34%
4
40%
9.9
-48%
9.8
-46%
8.2 ?(2.6 - 23, n=25)
-22%
Idle Average *
12.6
7.9
37%
8.7
31%
6.3
50%
17.4
-38%
12.5
1%
12.6 ?(6.5 - 25, n=25)
-0%
Idle Maximum *
15.4
8.6
44%
9.6
38%
14.5
6%
22.5
-46%
13.7
11%
17.2 ?(7.9 - 30, n=25)
-12%
Load Average *
85.7
46.5
46%
46
46%
79.2
8%
85.6
-0%
39.3
54%
Witcher 3 ultra *
83
43
48%
42.2
49%
68.2
18%
70.9
15%
44.8
46%
Load Maximum *
110.9
67.4
39%
87.6
21%
99.4
10%
91.1
18%
72.8
34%
139.1 ?(63 - 195, n=25)
-25%

* ... smaller is better

Energy consumption during The Witcher 3 / stress test

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
SCHENKER Vision 14; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø83 (80.7-86.6)
SCHENKER Vision 14; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø102.8 (99.3-110)

Energy consumption with an external monitor

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
SCHENKER Vision 14; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø69.1 (67.4-76.5)
SCHENKER Vision 14; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø80.2 (76.3-83.2)
SCHENKER Vision 14; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø79 (76.9-81.6)
SCHENKER Vision 14; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø58.1 (53.8-64.4)

电池寿命

53Wh的电池容量保持不变。再加上略高的消耗量,运行时间比第一次评测的Vision 14要短一些。 视觉14的第一个审查样本.在Wi-Fi测试中,亮度为150cd/m²(相当于我们测试设备最大亮度的35%),该设备的运行时间仅为5:30小时,在最大亮度下甚至降至4:30小时。另一方面,视频运行时间(150cd/m²)保持不变(略低于7小时)。处理器较高的短期功耗在这里引起了注意,而Windows 11也可能在这里产生影响。因此,与竞争对手相比,Vision 14 H35只占据了一个较低的位置。只有微星Summit E14的关机时间稍早。当设备打开时,充满电需要不到2个小时,而50%的容量只需28分钟就能再次使用。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 97)
5h 27min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 97)
4h 31min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
6h 45min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 26min
SCHENKER Vision 14
i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 53 Wh
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 61 Wh
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
i7-1165G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, 53.1 Wh
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
i7-1185G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, 52 Wh
SCHENKER Vision 14
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 53 Wh
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Battery Runtime
20%
57%
65%
-25%
6%
74%
H.264
405
693
71%
401
-1%
WiFi v1.3
327
502
54%
618
89%
541
65%
271
-17%
366
12%
Load
86
73
-15%
95
10%
58
-33%
Reader / Idle
889
1235
396

Pros

+ 轻便而坚固的镁合金外壳
+ 许多端口包括TB4
+ 非常好的3K面板
+ 两个M.2插槽和RAM插槽
+ 非常高的系统性能
+ 由于RTX 3050 Ti的存在,GPU得到了极大的提升
+ 全面的SD读卡器

Cons

- 电池寿命短
- 铰链允许晃动
- 电池供电时明显的GPU节流现象

结论 - "愿景14 "浪费了潜力

在审查中。Schenker Vision 14。测试设备由申克技术公司提供。
在审查中。Schenker Vision 14。测试设备由申克技术公司提供。

由于采用了专用的GeForce RTX 3050 Ti,新版本的Vision 14为这款紧凑型超极本提供了一个体面的性能提升。尽管如此,该设备仍然非常轻,不到1.2公斤,因此实际上是无可匹敌的。配备专用GPU的竞争对手明显更重,而这个重量级别的所有其他型号只配备集成GPU。

同时,处理器也得到了升级。安装的不是Tiger Lake-U芯片,而是稍快的Tiger Lake-H35处理器,它也得益于更强的冷却。然而,由于这基本上是一个普通的四核CPU,该处理器提供的性能提升仍然很低。快速iGPU的优势是H45芯片所不具备的,在配备了GeForce GPU的机型中根本没有发挥出作用。在我们看来,RTX 3050 Ti的理想组合应该是来自AMD的U处理器,但由于其供应量有限,在Vision 14中并没有发现这些处理器。但是,英特尔的 "慢速 "H45处理器也会是一个更好的选择,它有六个或八个内核,运行时只需要40瓦,(尽管在这种情况下,不同的芯片组及其各自更高的开发成本将是必要的)。

由于RTX 3050 Ti的存在,Vision 14的图形性能得到了明显的改善,但英特尔H35处理器并不能真正做到令人信服。此外,这款轻量级超极本在Wi-Fi模式下的实际运行时间很短,大约5-6小时。

然而,性能开发本身是没有问题的,尽管你必须处理高负荷下的巨大风扇。最后,紧凑机箱内的所有热量都必须以某种方式散去。另外两个负面因素是再次出现的摇晃的盖子和短暂的电池寿命。你只是为3K显示屏的高图像质量(90赫兹)付出代价,这里没有使用PWM。此外,GPU性能在电池供电时被大量节流,当设备不插电时,游戏几乎不可能。

寻找具有快速GPU的最轻的笔记本电脑的用户,目前只能找到一些替代品,如 RazerBlade Stealth 13微星Summit E14.另一方面,那些不打算玩游戏并对iGPU的性能感到满意的人应该看一下 华为MateBook 14s联想IdeaPad Slim i7 Pro.当然,Vision 14 H35也有不含RTX 3050 Ti的版本,还有配备Tiger Lake U处理器以及全高清面板(电池寿命更长)的 "普通 "Vision 14。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

如果你在欧盟,你很幸运,因为你可以直接从制造商的网上商店购买Vision 14价格从1249欧元(约合人民币1392元)起。我们的测试配置包括Core i7、RTX 3050 Ti、32GB内存和1TB PCIe 4.0固态硬盘,价格略高于2,000欧元(约合2,228美元),目前交货时间约为两到三周。

SCHENKER Vision 14 - 01/24/2022 v7
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
87 / 98 → 89%
Keyboard
88%
Pointing Device
98%
Connectivity
67 / 75 → 89%
Weight
74 / 20-75 → 97%
Battery
67%
Display
92%
Games Performance
87 / 78 → 100%
Application Performance
95 / 85 → 100%
Temperature
83%
Noise
84%
Audio
69 / 91 → 76%
Camera
30 / 85 → 36%
Average
79%
88%
Subnotebook - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Schenker Vision 14笔记本电脑回顾。现在还可以使用GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
Andreas Osthoff, 2022-01-29 (Update: 2022-01-29)