Notebookcheck Logo

Medion Erazer Beast X25 (Tongfang GM7ZG8P) 游戏笔记本电脑评测。轻巧而又强大

慷慨的配置。 对于一个17英寸的笔记本电脑,Erazer Beast X25不仅是令人愉快的紧凑,而且它的重量也少得令人惊讶。尽管如此,它的引擎盖下装有极其强大的游戏硬件,保证了高度的未来性;它还配有大量的内存和存储空间。
AMD Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Ryzen (Zen)
Medion Erazer Beast X25

高端笔记本电脑必须非常笨重的日子已经一去不复返了。来自Medion的Erazer Beast X25是新的、相当苗条和轻盈的一代游戏笔记本电脑的最佳例子之一,尽管它的尺寸为17英寸,但仅重2.3公斤,而且也相对较薄,总高度为2.3厘米(包括机箱脚在内为2.6厘米)。这使得这款17英寸的产品在携带时有些舒适,而且不会在桌面上占用太多的空间。结合谨慎的设计,Beast X25看起来相当温和。只有当你打开它,键盘上色彩鲜艳的RGB灯光被激活时,你才能注意到它的游戏性质。

当涉及到硬件时,Medion将踏板放在金属上。AMDRyzen 9 5900HX处理器和Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080笔记本电脑显卡,配备16GB的VRAM,是目前笔记本电脑市场上最快的组件之一。此外--正如最初提到的--还有大量的内存和存储。64GB的DDR4-3200内存(双通道模式下的2x 32GB)和2TB的M.2 NVMe固态硬盘一样充足(如果需要,还有空间再装一个M.2固态硬盘)。在我们的评测样本中,MD63835的价格略低于2,700欧元(约合3,191美元),该配置由一个具有1920x1080像素的快速240赫兹面板来完成。喜欢更清晰显示的用户应该对MD62210型号感到满意,它的价格高出200欧元(约合236美元),采用QHD显示屏(165赫兹,2560x1440像素)。

Medion Erazer Beast X25 (Erazer Series)
Processor
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX 8 x 3.3 - 4.6 GHz, 95 W PL2 / Short Burst, 50 W PL1 / Sustained, Cezanne-H (Zen 3)
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, Core: 1545 MHz, Memory: 1750 MHz, 130 W TDP ( including 5 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, ForceWare 462.42, Optimus
Memory
64 GB 
, DDR4-3200, dual-channel, two slots (both in use)
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, BOE NE173FHM-NZ1 (BOE0884), IPS, Full HD, glossy: no, 240 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, 2048 GB 
, NVMe SSD, two M.2-2280 slots (one in use)
Soundcard
Realtek ALC274 @ AMD K19.5 - Audio Processor - High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: one audio out, one mic in, Card Reader: microSD
Networking
Realtek Gaming 2.5GbE Family Controller (10MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 23 x 395 x 262
Battery
91 Wh Lithium-Polymer, 6 cells
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Additional features
Speakers: 2.0, Keyboard: chiclet RGB, Keyboard Light: yes, 230-watt power adapter, Control Center, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.27 kg, Power Supply: 500 g
Price
2 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Erazer Beast X25的竞争对手包括其他配备GeForce RTX 3080和现代高端CPU的17英寸游戏笔记本电脑,如华硕Strix Scar 17 G733QSA华硕ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD技嘉Aero 17 HDR YD Aorus 17G YD,所有这些都作为对比设备出现在表中。

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
85 %
08/2021
Medion Erazer Beast X25
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg23 mm17.30"1920x1080
86.6 %
09/2021
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.8 kg28.3 mm17.30"1920x1080
88 %
09/2021
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
i9-11980HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.8 kg22 mm17.30"3840x2160
90.1 %
08/2021
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.8 kg19.9 mm17.30"2560x1440
86 %
06/2021
Aorus 17G YD
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.8 kg26 mm17.30"1920x1080

由于同方的机箱(GM7ZG8P裸机)与最近评测的Erazer Beast X20(GM7MG7P裸机)基本相同,我们不会在本文中讨论机箱、连接(端口等)和输入设备。你可以在 链接的评论中找到相应的信息

Medion Erazer Beast X25
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Medion Erazer Beast X25

Size comparison

405 mm 276 mm 26 mm 2.8 kg395 mm 282 mm 28.3 mm 2.8 kg395 mm 262 mm 23 mm 2.3 kg396 mm 270 mm 22 mm 2.8 kg394 mm 264 mm 19.9 mm 2.8 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

SD卡阅读器

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Aorus 17G YD
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
192 MB/s +143%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
184 MB/s +133%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
 
183 (181.31min - 182.94max) MB/s +132%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=103, last 2 years)
99 MB/s +25%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
79 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
 
257 MB/s +225%
Aorus 17G YD
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
197 MB/s +149%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
188 MB/s +138%
Average of class Gaming
  (26 - 269, n=94, last 2 years)
122.9 MB/s +56%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
79 MB/s

沟通

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1588 (1508min - 1656max) MBit/s +6%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1498 (748min - 1544max) MBit/s
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1369 (693min - 1436max) MBit/s -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (885 - 1412, n=7, last 2 years)
1147 MBit/s -23%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
  (447 - 1645, n=127)
1104 MBit/s -26%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
907 (799min - 997max) MBit/s -39%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
MediaTek MT7921
636 (325min - 728max) MBit/s -58%
iperf3 receive AX12
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1433 (1359min - 1510max) MBit/s +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (881 - 1700, n=7, last 2 years)
1391 MBit/s 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1390 (669min - 1618max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
  (523 - 1684, n=128)
1191 MBit/s -14%
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1169 (619min - 1217max) MBit/s -16%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1152 (915min - 1267max) MBit/s -17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
MediaTek MT7921
698 (529min - 748max) MBit/s -50%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600Tooltip
Medion Erazer Beast X25; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1367 (669-1618)
Medion Erazer Beast X25; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1473 (748-1544)

网络摄像头

ColorChecker
13.4 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
15 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
11 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Medion Erazer Beast X25: 13.75 ∆E min: 7.88 - max: 19.13 ∆E

显示--240赫兹,反应时间快

该显示屏由全高清分辨率的无光泽IPS面板组成,由于其240赫兹的高频率,在任何情况下都感觉非常流畅。响应时间也同样可观。我们能够在从黑色到白色以及从灰色到灰色的过程中测量到10毫秒以下。因此,这台17英寸显示器也完全适合于特别快的游戏,如第一人称射击游戏。

337
cd/m²
316
cd/m²
329
cd/m²
310
cd/m²
329
cd/m²
296
cd/m²
322
cd/m²
302
cd/m²
298
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE NE173FHM-NZ1 (BOE0884) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 337 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 315.4 cd/m² Minimum: 15 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 329 cd/m²
Contrast: 997:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.03 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.82
ΔE Greyscale 3.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
71.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.223
Medion Erazer Beast X25
BOE NE173FHM-NZ1 (BOE0884), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AU Optronics B173HAN05.4, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
AU Optronics AUO329B, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
BOE099D (BOE CQ NE173QHM-NY3), IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30
Aorus 17G YD
Sharp LQ173M1JW04, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Display
1%
21%
17%
2%
Display P3 Coverage
70.4
71
1%
86.9
23%
94.2
34%
72.3
3%
sRGB Coverage
99.8
99.4
0%
100
0%
98.7
-1%
100
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
71.6
72.2
1%
99.6
39%
84.4
18%
73.7
3%
Response Times
-33%
-415%
3%
-56%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
9.2 ?(4.8, 4.4)
6.6 ?(2.2, 4.4)
28%
52 ?(25.2, 26.8)
-465%
4.8
48%
13.6 ?(6.8, 6.8)
-48%
Response Time Black / White *
5.6 ?(2.8, 2.8)
10.8 ?(5.2, 5.6)
-93%
26 ?(10, 16)
-364%
8
-43%
9.2 ?(5.2, 4)
-64%
PWM Frequency
Screen
4%
32%
-20%
-5%
Brightness middle
329
303.8
-8%
488
48%
322
-2%
286
-13%
Brightness
315
292
-7%
467
48%
288
-9%
282
-10%
Brightness Distribution
88
85
-3%
86
-2%
72
-18%
73
-17%
Black Level *
0.33
0.23
30%
0.33
-0%
0.3
9%
0.24
27%
Contrast
997
1321
32%
1479
48%
1073
8%
1192
20%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.03
1.87
8%
1.23
39%
3.05
-50%
2.79
-37%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.5
3.26
41%
2.94
47%
5.23
5%
6.23
-13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.82
1.45
-77%
0.77
6%
1.92
-134%
0.82
-0%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.5
2.7
23%
1.5
57%
3.11
11%
3.5
-0%
Gamma
2.223 99%
2.26 97%
2.169 101%
2.13 103%
2.358 93%
CCT
6526 100%
6436 101%
6614 98%
6553 99%
6147 106%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
65.6
99
84
74
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.4
99
99
96
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-9% / -2%
-121% / -34%
0% / -9%
-20% / -11%

* ... smaller is better

其余的参数在积极意义上是相当不起眼的。亮度值略低于315cd/m²,应能满足大多数买家的要求,对比度约为1,000:1,即使竞争对手的对比度更高一些。同时,色彩空间覆盖率分别为99.8%(sRGB)和71.6%(AdobeRGB),与竞争对手持平。只有技嘉Aero 17 HDR YD的4K面板能够在这个类别中明显脱颖而出(99.6% AdobeRGB)。

卡尔曼:灰鳞
卡尔曼:灰鳞
卡尔曼:色彩饱和度
卡尔曼:色彩饱和度
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: 灰度表(已校准
CalMAN: 灰度表(已校准
CalMAN:色彩饱和度(已校准)。
CalMAN:色彩饱和度(已校准)。
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)

在色彩准确性方面,Beast X25的表现很好。在Calman测量软件的ColorChecker测试中,DeltaE 2000值保持在理想范围内,平均为2.03(最高为3),通过校准甚至可以获得更好的值。我们相应的ICC文件在上面的亮度分布图旁边进一步链接。作为IPS面板的典型,在视角稳定性方面也没有什么可抱怨的。

Medion Erazer Beast X25与sRGB的对比
Medion Erazer Beast X25与sRGB的对比
子像素网格
子像素网格
Medion Erazer Beast X25与AdobeRGB的对比
Medion Erazer Beast X25与AdobeRGB的对比

最多,在户外使用时,全高清面板会暴露出弱点。虽然在阴凉处亮度通常足够,但你会发现自己希望在阳光充足的地方有更高的亮度。

周围的光线
周围的光线
视角
视角

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.8 ms rise
↘ 2.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
9.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.8 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

测试条件 - 控制中心的许多选项

裸机制造商同方的综合控制中心值得大加赞扬。这个预装的工具可以用来调整大量的系统设置。例如,你可以(取消)激活Optimus图形切换功能或改变性能配置文件。

我们的测试都是使用Optimus技术和 "游戏 "性能模式进行的。后者为CPU提供50瓦,并将显卡的TGP设置为130瓦(125瓦+5瓦的动态提升)。如果你想从17英寸的显示器中榨取更多的性能,你可以将动态提升增加到最大15瓦,这导致总功率为140瓦。其他两种模式的标准设置,即 "办公 "和 "涡轮",可以在下面的截图中看到。一个有趣的事实:根据Nvidia驱动程序和Medion的主页,该显卡甚至可以达到165瓦的TGP。然而,在我们的测试设备中,这个数值是无法选择的。

快速切换
快速切换
模式选择
模式选择
风扇设置
风扇设置
SPC设置(办公室模式
SPC设置(办公室模式
SPC设置(游戏模式
SPC设置(游戏模式
SPC设置(涡轮模式
SPC设置(涡轮模式

性能--AMD与Nvidia的结合

如果你非常关心未来,Medion Erazer Beast X25是一个完美的伴侣。即使在游戏领域,64GB的内存和2TB的SSD存储也不是必然的。许多竞争对手不得不用16到32GB和500到1000GB的固态硬盘来凑合。适当地,Medion安装了当时最强大的移动Nvidia GPU和最强大的移动AMD CPU之一。

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
AS SSD基准测试
水晶盘标志

处理器

Ryzen 9 5900HX是一个极其强大的八核型号,配备了16MB的L3缓存,可以使用SMT并行处理多达16个线程。在45瓦,TDP与英特尔的竞争产品相似,但AMD使用的是略微精细的制造工艺(7纳米对10纳米 @Tiger Lake )。

Cinebench R23
Single Core
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 2235, n=237, last 2 years)
1799 Points +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
1586 Points +6%
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
1497 Points 0%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1497 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1491 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (1218 - 1499, n=29)
1471 Points -1%
Multi Core
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 34613, n=239, last 2 years)
19100 Points +54%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
13618 (13498.1min - 13618.3max) Points +10%
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
12862 Points +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
12720 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (6622 - 14363, n=30)
12529 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
12373 Points
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=237, last 2 years)
693 Points +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
608 Points +5%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
Intel Core i9-11980HK
585 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
581 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (471 - 584, n=29)
573 Points -1%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
572 Points -2%
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
541 Points -7%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=237, last 2 years)
7255 Points +52%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5277 Points +10%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
Intel Core i9-11980HK
5256 Points +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
5023 Points +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (2242 - 5476, n=30)
4847 Points +1%
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
4818 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
4776 Points
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=241, last 2 years)
266 Points +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
241 Points +1%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
240 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
239 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (197 - 243, n=25)
238 Points 0%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
Intel Core i9-11980HK
230 Points -4%
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
227 Points -5%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=242, last 2 years)
3024 Points +48%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
2223 (2202.89min - 2222.96max) Points +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
2184 (2043.84min - 2183.76max) Points +7%
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
2089 Points +2%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
Intel Core i9-11980HK
2067 (1924.65min - 2067.29max) Points +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (1076 - 2267, n=29)
2050 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
2041 (1981.96min - 2041.34max) Points
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
284.1 Seconds * -14%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
250 Seconds *
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (219 - 442, n=29)
250 Seconds * -0%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
Intel Core i9-11980HK
233 Seconds * +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
231 Seconds * +8%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
230 Seconds * +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 1259, n=235, last 2 years)
205 Seconds * +18%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 7581, n=236, last 2 years)
6062 MIPS +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
5795 MIPS +2%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5747 MIPS +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (4791 - 5905, n=29)
5701 MIPS +1%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
Intel Core i9-11980HK
5668 MIPS 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5664 MIPS
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
5547 MIPS -2%
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 140932, n=236, last 2 years)
75363 MIPS +27%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
62023 MIPS +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
59182 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (36011 - 62503, n=29)
57266 MIPS -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
57263 MIPS -3%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
Intel Core i9-11980HK
56759 MIPS -4%
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
48261 MIPS -18%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 2193, n=241, last 2 years)
1795 Points +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
1648 Points +8%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
Intel Core i9-11980HK
1613 Points +5%
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
1583 Points +4%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1539 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1529 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (1271 - 1574, n=27)
1517 Points -1%
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 22200, n=241, last 2 years)
13326 Points +43%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
Intel Core i9-11980HK
9884 Points +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
9628 Points +4%
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
9317 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
9294 Points
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
8732 Points -6%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (5057 - 9294, n=27)
8188 Points -12%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 37.6, n=239, last 2 years)
20.8 fps +32%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
16.9 fps +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
16.7 fps +6%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
Intel Core i9-11980HK
15.8 fps 0%
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
15.8 fps 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
15.8 fps
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (8.26 - 17.1, n=29)
15.2 fps -4%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (44.1 - 87.4, n=29)
53.3 s * -8%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
49.3 s *
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 332, n=233, last 2 years)
49.1 s * -0%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
45.9 s * +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
44.4 s * +10%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
Intel Core i9-11980HK
41.1 s * +17%
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
39 s * +21%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.558 sec * -13%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
Intel Core i9-11980HK
0.552 sec * -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
0.53 sec * -8%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (0.48 - 0.599, n=29)
0.507 sec * -3%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
0.4964 sec * -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
0.4926 sec *
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 4.47, n=236, last 2 years)
0.4734 sec * +4%

* ... smaller is better

从纸面上看,时钟速率从3.3到最高4.6GHz。在我们的Cinebench R15测试中,CPU在单核负载下达到3.6至4.6 GHz,当所有核心都处于负载状态时,平均为3.7 GHz。这个数值对于Ryzen 9 5900HX来说有点差。华硕Strix Scar 17 G733QSA也配备了5900HX,在直接比较中提供了更好的基准测试结果。性能更符合基于英特尔酷睿i7-11800H或酷睿i9-11980H(K)的笔记本电脑。在使用涡轮增压模式或在控制中心程序中手动增加CPU值时,Beast X25应该能够胜过英特尔的竞争对手。

Cinebench R15 Multi endurance test

011523034546057569080592010351150126513801495161017251840195520702185Tooltip
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX: Ø2004 (1981.96-2041.34)
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX: Ø2216 (2202.89-2222.96)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD Intel Core i9-11980HK: Ø2023 (1924.65-2067.29)
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD Intel Core i9-11900H: Ø2117 (2043.84-2183.76)
Aorus 17G YD Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1943 (1915.62-2089.21)

根据上图,你可以看到,即使经过几次运行,CPU的性能仍然相当稳定,并没有出现任何重大的下降。

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2041 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
157 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
239 Points
Help

系统性能

可能是由于固态硬盘的结果相对较弱,当涉及到系统测试时,Erazer在我们的测试领域中排名最后。尽管如此,这款笔记本电脑还是以非常高的系统速度获得了分数,在快速启动、加载和响应时间等方面表现突出。

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=203, last 2 years)
7573 Points +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7245 Points +6%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
7184 Points +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (6807 - 7416, n=6)
7097 Points +4%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
7088 Points +4%
Aorus 17G YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
7073 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
6842 Points
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average of class Gaming
  (8300 - 12334, n=202, last 2 years)
10701 Points +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10630 Points +6%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
10593 Points +6%
Aorus 17G YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
10295 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (10018 - 10593, n=6)
10288 Points +3%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
10212 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10018 Points
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average of class Gaming
  (7244 - 11833, n=202, last 2 years)
9729 Points +5%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
9573 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (8546 - 10066, n=6)
9451 Points +2%
Aorus 17G YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
9259 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9252 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9182 Points -1%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
9098 Points -2%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming
  (6462 - 18475, n=202, last 2 years)
11407 Points +22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10573 Points +13%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
10403 Points +11%
Aorus 17G YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
10075 Points +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (9377 - 10582, n=6)
9990 Points +7%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
9923 Points +6%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9377 Points
PCMark 10 Score
6842 points
Help

DPC延迟

在用LatencyMon工具进行的延迟测试中没有明显的问题。17英寸机似乎是实时音频和视频编辑的理想选择。

延迟监测
延迟监测
延迟监测
延迟监测
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2676 μs * -195%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1445 μs * -59%
Aorus 17G YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1064 μs * -17%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
907 μs *
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
611 μs * +33%

* ... smaller is better

储存

就像竞争对手一样,Medion安装了来自三星的快如闪电的PCIe 4固态硬盘,但在AS固态硬盘基准测试和CrystalDiskMark中却出人意料地落后于对比笔记本电脑,正如我们的表格所显示的。很好。由于有免费的M.2插槽,如果需要的话,存储空间可以不费吹灰之力就能扩大。

Medion Erazer Beast X25
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Aorus 17G YD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
54%
65%
58%
41%
Write 4K
129.7
235.9
82%
230.4
78%
244.2
88%
227.4
75%
Read 4K
62.4
48.02
-23%
91.6
47%
89.8
44%
91.3
46%
Write Seq
2436
4822
98%
4216
73%
2241
-8%
Read Seq
2354
5043
114%
4543
93%
4496
91%
Write 4K Q32T1
512
625
22%
667
30%
607
19%
661
29%
Read 4K Q32T1
436.2
392.3
-10%
728
67%
658
51%
712
63%
Write Seq Q32T1
3541
5350
51%
5043
42%
5270
49%
1540
-57%
Read Seq Q32T1
3568
7130
100%
6821
91%
7091
99%
6806
91%
AS SSD
14%
47%
64%
25%
Seq Read
2591
4981
92%
5438
110%
5085
96%
5150
99%
Seq Write
1900
3050
61%
3904
105%
4434
133%
3920
106%
4K Read
53.9
57
6%
56.2
4%
80.3
49%
46.6
-14%
4K Write
112.6
261.3
132%
165.8
47%
214.7
91%
145.8
29%
4K-64 Read
1335
1205
-10%
2489
86%
2573
93%
2071
55%
4K-64 Write
2966
1290
-57%
3480
17%
2972
0%
3267
10%
Access Time Read *
0.038
0.032
16%
0.054
-42%
0.018
53%
0.078
-105%
Access Time Write *
0.036
0.044
-22%
0.026
28%
0.02
44%
0.029
19%
Score Read
1648
1760
7%
3089
87%
3161
92%
2633
60%
Score Write
3269
1857
-43%
4036
23%
3631
11%
2805
-14%
Score Total
5733
4428
-23%
8620
50%
8380
46%
7716
35%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
34% / 31%
56% / 55%
61% / 62%
33% / 32%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3568 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3541 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 436.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 512 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2354 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2436 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 62.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 129.7 MB/s

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

图形卡

GeForce RTX 3080,这是Nvidia安培一代的绝对高端型号,具有6144个CUDA核心和16GB GDDR6 VRAM,负责Erazer中苛刻的图形计算。GPU-Z工具报告说,该芯片的时钟速度在1,110和1,545 MHz之间(基础/提升),其内存的时钟速度为1,750 MHz。

目前Nvidia GPU的性能在很大程度上取决于配置的TGP,制造商可以相对自由地选择。正如以前的报告,DirectX 12芯片在 "游戏模式 "下运行的功率为130瓦,包括动态提升,考虑到我们的RTX 3080笔记本电脑文章 ,这代表了一个合格的价值;这相应地反映在图形基准上,野兽X25通常在我们比较领域的(低)中场。

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
29508 Points +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=245, last 2 years)
29195 Points +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
28939 Points +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (16455 - 32366, n=45)
27464 Points +3%
Aorus 17G YD
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
27275 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
26771 Points
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
26177 Points -2%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22547, n=243, last 2 years)
11907 Points +11%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
11598 Points +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
11424 Points +6%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
10752 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (6407 - 13210, n=44)
10695 Points -1%
Aorus 17G YD
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
10144 Points -6%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
9989 Points -7%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
40704 Points +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72070, n=241, last 2 years)
39928 Points +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (31288 - 43744, n=39)
38345 Points +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
38087 Points +7%
Aorus 17G YD
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
36043 Points +1%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
35787 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
35678 Points
3DMark 11 Performance
27989 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
48998 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
23834 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
10580 points
Help

游戏性能

尽管在我们的游戏测试中,Beast X25并没有排在最前面,但其3D性能非常高。所有最新的游戏都可以在1920x1080的原始分辨率和高到最大的细节下顺利进行。对于外部QHD(2560x1440像素)或UHD(3840x2160像素)显示器来说,往往会有足够的潜力。只有在极端的CPU密集型游戏中,情况才会变得困难,如赛博朋克2077和/或在没有DLSS的情况下启用光线追踪时,情况才会变得困难。

Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
98.6 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD -1!
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H
96.4 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
 
90.2 pt
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD -2!
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK
88.7 pt
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
87.7 pt
Aorus 17G YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
85.5 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X25
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
84.8 pt
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming
  (17.5 - 449, n=172, last 2 years)
216 fps +23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H
197.1 fps +13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (149 - 242, n=31)
190.4 fps +9%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
184.9 (173min - 192max) fps +6%
Aorus 17G YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
183 (68.1min, 80.8P0.1, 115P1 - 443max) fps +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
175 (146min) fps
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (8.61 - 216, n=238, last 2 years)
115.1 fps +18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H
112 fps +14%
Aorus 17G YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
106 (43.4min, 50.9P0.1, 68.2P1 - 195max) fps +8%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
105.5 (91min - 115max) fps +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (85.1 - 123, n=39)
105.2 fps +7%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
97.9 (84min) fps
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK
93.4 (80min) fps -5%
Far Cry 5
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 232, n=119, last 2 years)
134.4 fps +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H
134 fps +13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (79 - 155, n=27)
121.1 fps +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
119 (94min) fps
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
117 (90min - 151max) fps -2%
Aorus 17G YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
115 (90min - 140max) fps -3%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (14 - 218, n=129, last 2 years)
125.8 fps +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H
125 fps +14%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK
118 fps +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (75 - 146, n=32)
113.3 fps +3%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
111 (87min - 145max) fps +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
110 (83min) fps
Aorus 17G YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
108 (79min - 136max) fps -2%
GTA V
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H
176 (3.22min, 125P1 - 361max) fps +12%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK
166 (4.07min, 111P1 - 274max) fps +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (15.3 - 187.1, n=187, last 2 years)
163.2 fps +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (137 - 176, n=29)
162.4 fps +3%
Aorus 17G YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
158 (5.15min, 90.9P1 - 287max) fps +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
157 (4.69min, 100P1 - 353max) fps
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
156 (6.65min, 111P1 - 258max) fps -1%
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H
112 (6.15min, 76.9P1 - 208max) fps +22%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.38 - 167.7, n=227, last 2 years)
106.3 fps +16%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK
103 (5.99min, 71.4P1 - 221max) fps +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (68.6 - 112, n=33)
97.2 fps +6%
Aorus 17G YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
95.7 (17.9min, 66.7P1 - 174max) fps +4%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
93 (7.94min, 71.4P1 - 160max) fps +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
91.9 (26.9min, 66.7P1 - 171max) fps
Strange Brigade
1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8
Average of class Gaming
  (17.5 - 465, n=195, last 2 years)
229 fps +27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (165 - 248, n=29)
212 fps +18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H
210 (112min, 146P1 - 348max) fps +17%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK
193 (86.6min, 142P1 - 359max) fps +7%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
189 (119min, 130P1 - 363max) fps +5%
Aorus 17G YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
184 (68.7min, 140P1 - 304max) fps +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
180 (70.1min, 121P1 - 349max) fps
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming
  (14.6 - 421, n=235, last 2 years)
203 fps +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H
186 (93.1min, 142P1 - 286max) fps +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (117 - 219, n=33)
184 fps +10%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
175 (86.8min, 125P1 - 343max) fps +4%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK
172 (86min, 125P1 - 285max) fps +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
168 (63.8min, 123P1 - 334max) fps
Aorus 17G YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
163 (119min, 123P1 - 273max) fps -3%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (9.13 - 194.9, n=237, last 2 years)
109.6 fps +13%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
106 fps +9%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK
99 fps +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (55.5 - 115, n=33)
98.9 fps +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
97 fps
Aorus 17G YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
93.8 fps -3%

我们检查了RPG热门游戏的帧率是否在很长一段时间内保持不变。 我们检查了Witcher 3我们运行了60分钟(全高清/超清)。就像我们在CPU测试中已经看到的那样,Erazer在这里也没有受到性能下降的影响。

The Witcher 3 FPS diagram

0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD i9-11980HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU; FPS: Ø97.2 (95-100)
Medion Erazer Beast X25 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU: Ø97.3 (93-101)
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU: Ø101.2 (46-106)
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU: Ø110.5 (105-113)
Aorus 17G YD i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU: Ø116.4 (109-125)
low med. high ultra
GTA V (2015) 180 157 91.9
The Witcher 3 (2015) 175 97.9
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 147 141 126 119
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 170 127 97
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 101 87.4 72.1
Far Cry 5 (2018) 119 110
Strange Brigade (2018) 332 199 180 168
Hunt Showdown (2020) 122
Death Stranding (2020) 135 134
Mafia Definitive Edition (2020) 104
Resident Evil Village (2021) 155 144
Mass Effect Legendary Edition (2021) 109
Days Gone (2021) 130 100
F1 2021 (2021) 165 111

排放 - 喷气式飞机

噪声排放

薄型结构的一个主要缺点是噪音大,尽管大多数游戏笔记本电脑都要在这方面做斗争。Witcher 3 ,一小时后约为52 dB(A),相当响亮,不戴耳机只能部分忍受。只有华硕ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD在测试中明显地更安静。

Beast X25在空闲模式下的表现也需要改进。尽管笔记本电脑有时完全无声(除了暂时的线圈啸叫),或者它只是以略低于30 dB(A)的相当微妙的水平发出嘶嘶声,但风扇偶尔会无缘无故地转速超过40 dB(A),这将使敏感的用户感到烦恼。控制中心的 "办公室模式 "提供了一个解决方案,或至少提供了一些衰减。

Noise Level

Idle
26 / 30 / 43 dB(A)
Load
54 / 55 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 25 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.238.339.437.841.62533.934.8373534.63141.543.948.545.545.14029.630.835.432.432.35027.733.828.82831.96329.435.828.925.232.880342622.218.632.710027.62319.416.827.812528.923.926.117.129.816030.324.325.819.732.52003239.925.225.133.525033.829.922.619.835.831536.828.522.315.939.440039.742.225.213.440.150038.131.722.212.238.96303828.817.312.138.48003928.817.311.739.2100041.729.417.611.542.8125044.731.81911.945.2160045.832.419.51246.2200043.429.816.712.143.6250042.428.315.81243.3315041.426.915.812.542.4400041.326.715.913.141.850004329.117.813.644.3630041.223.415.41342.8800038.516.513.613.139.21000038.115.813.313.337.81250034.114.813.712.9331600033.314.713.212.129.5SPL54.142.630.225.354.9N9.54.21.40.710median 38.5median 28.5median 17.6median 13median 39.2Delta4.43.64.21.94.8hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseMedion Erazer Beast X25
Medion Erazer Beast X25
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
i9-11980HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Aorus 17G YD
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
16%
-0%
19%
-2%
11%
off / environment *
25
25
-0%
25
-0%
23
8%
25
-0%
24.1 ?(19.5 - 29.9, n=189, last 2 years)
4%
Idle Minimum *
26
25.2
3%
30
-15%
23
12%
32
-23%
25.7 ?(21.9 - 41.6, n=190, last 2 years)
1%
Idle Average *
30
25.2
16%
32
-7%
23
23%
33
-10%
27.4 ?(21.9 - 42.1, n=190, last 2 years)
9%
Idle Maximum *
43
25.2
41%
41
5%
23
47%
39
9%
30.8 ?(21.9 - 47, n=190, last 2 years)
28%
Load Average *
54
30.7
43%
43
20%
41
24%
43
20%
43 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=190, last 2 years)
20%
Witcher 3 ultra *
52
51.3
1%
51
2%
45
13%
52
-0%
Load Maximum *
55
51.3
7%
59
-7%
52
5%
61
-11%
53.3 ?(42.1 - 68.2, n=190, last 2 years)
3%

* ... smaller is better

温度

尽管噪音水平很高,但17英寸机箱在负载下会变得相对较热。在这种情况下,我们在使用FurMark和Prime95工具进行压力测试时,机箱顶部的温度高达54℃(约129°F),底部的温度高达57℃(约135°F)(最高温度分别为52℃(约126°F)和55℃(约131°F),@TheWitcher 3 )。另一方面,机箱在空闲使用时感觉相当凉爽,最高温度为35°C(约95°F)。

ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试

像往常一样,组件变得相当热。虽然Ryzen 9 5900HX在全负荷下节流到2.3 GHz,但HWMonitor工具报告了一个高但仍然不关键的85℃(约185°F)。GeForce RTX 3080的情况要好一些,在压力测试中(没有节流),它舒适地稳定在82°C左右(约180°F)。在我们的TheWitcher 3测试中,温度相似,但该设备能够达到更高的时钟速率(见截图)。

Max. Load
 53 °C54 °C48 °C 
 51 °C54 °C42 °C 
 42 °C45 °C41 °C 
Maximum: 54 °C
Average: 47.8 °C
53 °C57 °C52 °C
52 °C55 °C40 °C
38 °C40 °C36 °C
Maximum: 57 °C
Average: 47 °C
Power Supply (max.)  58 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 47.8 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 57 °C / 135 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 45.8 °C / 114 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-16.1 °C / -29 F).
Medion Erazer Beast X25
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
i9-11980HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Aorus 17G YD
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
11%
7%
-1%
16%
10%
Maximum Upper Side *
54
40
26%
44
19%
59
-9%
36
33%
46.3 ?(28.2 - 61, n=190, last 2 years)
14%
Maximum Bottom *
57
39.8
30%
56
2%
53
7%
52
9%
49.7 ?(30 - 66.3, n=190, last 2 years)
13%
Idle Upper Side *
34
34.6
-2%
32
6%
35
-3%
29
15%
31.5 ?(21.2 - 43, n=190, last 2 years)
7%
Idle Bottom *
35
38.4
-10%
35
-0%
35
-0%
33
6%
32.7 ?(22.6 - 45, n=190, last 2 years)
7%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.840.42535363145.543.64032.432.1502831.16325.234.38018.629.510016.822.612517.13016019.740.820025.151.325019.862.231515.965.540013.466.550012.268.763012.172.980011.771.7100011.572125011.970.416001273.3200012.170.825001267.7315012.565400013.164.1500013.67663001377.8800013.1711000013.377.21250012.970.91600012.171.5SPL25.384.6N0.763.3median 13median 70.4Delta1.96.533.236.433.229.736.129.722.822.222.821.421.121.42228.52232.237.932.244.326.544.351.322.851.354.332.454.358.718.858.755.916.655.955.817.355.854.318.554.356.517.456.558.714.158.757.513.357.560.511.860.556.411.656.455.111.255.155.411.455.458.211.558.266.711.566.766.611.766.661.211.461.26011.66062.511.862.559.311.859.353.112.153.149.811.649.850.311.150.373.725.273.732.30.732.3median 56.5median 11.8median 56.52.72.62.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMedion Erazer Beast X25Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Medion Erazer Beast X25 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 19% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 2.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理 - 强大的91Wh电池

能源消耗

对于一个具有图形切换功能的高端笔记本电脑来说,其能量率也不是很好或特别差。闲置时的22至34瓦和负载时的120至231瓦一样,与大多数竞争对手一致。只要你不过度使用控制中心的设置,附带的230瓦电源适配器有足够的容量。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 2.3 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 22 / 26 / 34 Watt
Load midlight 120 / 231 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Medion Erazer Beast X25
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
i9-11980HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Aorus 17G YD
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
21%
-5%
3%
1%
17%
Idle Minimum *
22
10.9
50%
25
-14%
21.7
1%
24
-9%
13.8 ?(2 - 64, n=185, last 2 years)
37%
Idle Average *
26
14.7
43%
28
-8%
27
-4%
26
-0%
19.1 ?(8 - 67, n=185, last 2 years)
27%
Idle Maximum *
34
26.8
21%
40
-18%
33
3%
38
-12%
26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=185, last 2 years)
21%
Load Average *
120
106.7
11%
114
5%
108
10%
101
16%
111.2 ?(32.1 - 202, n=185, last 2 years)
7%
Witcher 3 ultra *
189
192.4
-2%
176
7%
195
-3%
164
13%
Load Maximum *
231
228.4
1%
236
-2%
210
9%
230
-0%
250 ?(64.5 - 418, n=184, last 2 years)
-8%

* ... smaller is better

Energy consumption during The Witcher 3 / stress test

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190Tooltip
Medion Erazer Beast X25 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU: Ø189.2 (183-196)

电池寿命

虽然其他制造商在谈到电池寿命时喜欢讲童话故事,但Medion网站上提供的信息是非常保守的,最多3小时(视频播放)。在我们的自动Wi-Fi测试中,六芯91.2Wh的电池持续了近7个小时(在中等显示亮度下访问各种网站),这在游戏笔记本电脑领域是一个非常可敬的比率。在理想的条件下(无负载,最低亮度),17英寸的笔记本需要在10小时内再次插入电源。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
9h 51min
WiFi Websurfing
6h 50min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 21min
Medion Erazer Beast X25
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 91 Wh
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD
i9-11980HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Aorus 17G YD
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
26%
-17%
55%
-0%
-4%
Reader / Idle
591
797
35%
541
-8%
541 ?(57 - 1290, n=87, last 2 years)
-8%
WiFi v1.3
410
559
36%
334
-19%
449
10%
360
-12%
364 ?(57 - 745, n=188, last 2 years)
-11%
Load
81
86
6%
70
-14%
162
100%
96
19%
85.5 ?(36 - 173, n=150, last 2 years)
6%
H.264
430
370
391 ?(56 - 747, n=95, last 2 years)
Witcher 3 ultra
62
81.6 ?(47 - 155, n=22, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 通过控制中心提供众多设置选项(如TGP)。
+ 相对较轻和薄的外壳
+ 64GB的内存和2TB的SSD存储空间
+ 快速的240赫兹面板

Cons

- 非常高的噪音发展
- 没有Thunderbolt

结论 - 价格昂贵,但比许多竞争对手便宜

Erazer Beast X25(MD63835)。测试设备由德国Medion公司提供。
Erazer Beast X25(MD63835)。测试设备由德国Medion公司提供。

Medion Erazer Beast X25是一款理想的笔记本电脑,适合那些正在寻找一个谨慎、苗条和相对轻巧的设备的热情玩家,同时也是高度面向未来的。

虽然由于AMD处理器的存在,该机箱没有提供Thunderbolt端口,但该设备拥有(几乎)其他一切你可以从现代高端笔记本电脑中得到的东西。除了快速的240赫兹全高清面板(Beast X25还可以选择165赫兹的QHD显示屏),这里应该提到充足的内存和存储(64GB内存,2TB NVMe SSD)。

Ryzen 9 5900HXCPUGeForce RTX 3080笔记本GPU的组合在运行3D应用时特别强大。与其他制造商的笔记本电脑不同的是,CPU和GPU的TDP是固定的,你可以在预装的控制中心通过选择配置文件或手动调整相应的值--这是一个很大的优点和一个很好的独特卖点。

然而,强大的硬件导致了负载下的显著噪音水平,这鼓励使用耳机。闲置时的风扇控制也是次优的(关键词:"转速")。这也是评论中提到的竞争设备(例如华硕ROG Zephyrus S17 )在总体评级中得分略高的原因之一。

相对较好的性价比说明了Erazer Beast X25的优势。许多RTX 3080笔记本电脑的价格超过3000欧元(约3545美元),甚至接近4000欧元(约4723美元)大关。

价格和可用性

在美国,一个使用同方裸机系统作为其笔记本电脑基础的知名电子供应商是Eluktronics公司。在这种情况下,你会发现他们的MAX-17模型与我们的审查样本相当。价格从1799美元开始,你可以全面定制该设备以满足你的需求。

Medion Erazer Beast X25 - 07/25/2021 v7
Florian Glaser

Chassis
85 / 98 → 87%
Keyboard
83%
Pointing Device
83%
Connectivity
63 / 80 → 78%
Weight
61 / 10-66 → 91%
Battery
73 / 95 → 77%
Display
87%
Games Performance
98%
Application Performance
95%
Temperature
74 / 95 → 78%
Noise
57 / 90 → 64%
Audio
77%
Camera
40 / 85 → 46%
Average
75%
85%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Medion Erazer Beast X25 (Tongfang GM7ZG8P) 游戏笔记本电脑评测。轻巧而又强大
Florian Glaser, 2021-08-14 (Update: 2021-08-14)