结论--更精简、更轻巧,但也有一些妥协
与去年的 Inspiron 16 7640 2 英寸一体机相比,戴尔 16 Plus 2 英寸一体机既是升级版,也是降级版。 Inspiron 16 7640 2 合 1.它比以前更轻、更薄,图形处理性能更快,这可能有利于旅行者、休闲游戏玩家或 GPU 加速任务。
一些同比变化可能并不适合所有人。从酷睿 Ultra-H 处理器到酷睿 Ultra-V 处理器,原始处理能力降低了不少。同时,重新排列的端口可以说是雪上加霜,因为两个 USB-C 端口现在都紧紧挨在一起,影响了对接人体工学。电池容量也被大幅削减,以至于电池续航时间比 Inspiron 16 7640 2 合 1 更短,尽管旧系统配备了速度更快的酷睿 Ultra-H CPU。
能够欣赏集成数字键盘和相对较快的 iGPU 的平衡型用户可能更喜欢较新的戴尔 16 Plus 2 合 1。否则,依赖原始 CPU 马力的强力用户可能仍然需要较旧的 Inspiron 16 7640 2 合 1,特别是因为这两款机型采用完全相同的面板,可提供完全相同的观看体验。
Pros
Cons
戴尔 16 Plus 2 合 1 是以下机型的可转换版本 戴尔 16 Plus Clamshell的直接继承者 2024 Inspiron 16 7640 2 合 1.它代表了新一代主流笔记本电脑的开端,旨在取代即将过时的 Inspiron 命名惯例。
我们的测试机是中间配置,配备酷睿 Ultra 7 256V CPU 和 2.5K 90 Hz Mini-LED 触摸屏,售价约 1400 美元。低端型号可能配备更传统的 FHD IPS 触摸屏,而高端型号则配备 Core Ultra 9 288V。
戴尔 16 Plus 2 合 1 的竞争对手包括其他 16 英寸多媒体转换器,如 惠普 Envy x360 2-in-1 16, 联想 Yoga 7 2 合 1 16ILL10或 三星Galaxy Book5 Pro 360.
更多戴尔评论:
规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例
该机箱在 Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 的基础上进行了迭代,使用了类似的铝和塑料材料,具有熟悉的 "Inspiron "质感和品质。尺寸和重量方面,两款机型几乎完全相同,只是新机型的外形略显纤薄。
连接性
端口选项与去年的 Inspiron 相同,但有一个重要区别:没有集成 SD 读卡器。两个 USB-C 端口也进行了重新布局,可以说是越改越糟糕,因为你再也不能沿着系统的右边缘为它充电了。
交流
网络摄像头
标配 200 万像素网络摄像头,带物理快门,无红外功能。

可持续性
戴尔没有明确标注制造戴尔 16 Plus 2 合 1 时使用的任何可回收材料。包装不使用塑料,便于回收。
配件和保修
零售包装盒包括交流适配器和文件。如果在美国购买,制造商通常提供为期一年的保修服务。
输入设备
键盘和触摸板
键盘和点击板的比例为 1:1。 戴尔 16 Plus Clamshell相同的体验。与去年的 Inspiron 16 7640 2 合 1 机型相比,该机型在生产性方面有所提升,因为去年的 Inspiron 16 7640 2 合 1 机型偏爱大型扬声器格栅而不是集成的数字键盘。
显示屏
|
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 432.1 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.95 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.83}
calibrated: 1.16
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
94.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
99.5% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.3
CCT: 6222 K
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 AU Optronics B160QAT, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16", 90 Hz | Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 AU Optronics B160QAT, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16", 90 Hz | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 LEN160WUM, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 ATNA60CL09-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG AU Optronics B16QAN02.N, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 165 Hz | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr Samsung SDC41A6, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -1% | -53% | 1% | -4% | 1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.5 | 99.4 0% | 39.7 -60% | 99.9 0% | 96.8 -3% | 99.6 0% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 57.9 -42% | 100 0% | 99.8 0% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 94.2 | 92.5 -2% | 41 -56% | 96.6 3% | 84.7 -10% | 96.5 2% |
Response Times | 32% | 50% | 73% | 80% | 98% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 48.8 ? | 15.4 ? 68% | 30 ? 39% | 0.48 ? 99% | 12.9 ? 74% | 0.8 ? 98% |
Response Time Black / White * | 57.6 ? | 60.6 ? -5% | 22.5 ? 61% | 0.64 ? 99% | 8.9 ? 85% | 0.89 ? 98% |
PWM Frequency | 2807 ? | 2753.7 ? | 240 ? | 491.8 ? | ||
PWM Amplitude * | 50 | 40 20% | ||||
Screen | -49% | -169% | 16% | -22% | -19% | |
Brightness middle | 432.1 | 413 -4% | 317.9 -26% | 387 -10% | 475.4 10% | 399.4 -8% |
Brightness | 426 | 409 -4% | 304 -29% | 392 -8% | 440 3% | 405 -5% |
Brightness Distribution | 97 | 97 0% | 90 -7% | 98 1% | 89 -8% | 98 1% |
Black Level * | 0.14 | 0.25 | 0.36 | |||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.95 | 3.48 -78% | 7.39 -279% | 1 49% | 2.99 -53% | 4.05 -108% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.87 | 6.97 -80% | 21.43 -454% | 1.9 51% | 7.64 -97% | 6.69 -73% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.16 | 3.06 -164% | 0.74 36% | 1.02 12% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2 | 4.5 -125% | 6.5 -225% | 1.7 15% | 2.9 -45% | 1.1 45% |
Gamma | 2.3 96% | 2.15 102% | 2.22 99% | 2.25 98% | 2.31 95% | 2.27 97% |
CCT | 6222 104% | 6446 101% | 6140 106% | 6325 103% | 6472 100% | 6419 101% |
Contrast | 2950 | 1272 | 1321 | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -6% /
-21% | -57% /
-104% | 30% /
27% | 18% /
-1% | 27% /
5% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
57.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 50.4 ms rise | |
↘ 7.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 99 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
48.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 33.6 ms rise | |
↘ 15.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2807 Hz Amplitude: 50 % | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 2807 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2807 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8327 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前,我们将戴尔优化大师设置为性能模式。
处理器
酷睿 Ultra 7 256V 酷睿至尊 7 256V强调的是每瓦性能,而不是原始性能,因此与上一代产品相比,它的性能几乎没有提高。酷睿至尊 7 155U 甚至是 酷睿 i7-1355U如果用户不使用集成的 NPU,那么与上一代酷睿 Ultra 7 155U 甚至酷睿 i7-1355U 相比,它的优势就微乎其微了。也许最值得注意的是,升级到更昂贵的 酷睿至尊 9 288V根据我们对宏碁 Swift 16 AI 的体验,升级到更昂贵的酷睿 Ultra 9 288V 配置预计最多只能提升 5% 的性能。酷睿 酷睿至尊 7 155H去年 Inspiron 16 7640 2 合 1 中的酷睿 Ultra 7 155H 比酷睿 Ultra 256V 快大约 1.5 倍。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (8454 - 12781, n=19) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (40875 - 63401, n=19) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (1930 - 2817, n=19) | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (49084 - 49818, n=19) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (3817 - 4440, n=19) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (21670 - 33565, n=19) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (30957 - 40753, n=19) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (422 - 632, n=19) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (4258 - 6930, n=19) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (44223 - 54971, n=19) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr |
系统性能
PCMark 10 的成绩略低于联想 Yoga 7 2 合 1 16ILL10 的成绩,但始终低于联想 Yoga 7 2 合 1 16ILL10 的成绩。 联想 Yoga 7 二合一 16ILL10.由于采用了 Lunar Lake 的片上架构,因此内存性能非常快。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Performance Rating | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 |
PCMark 10 / Score | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (6265 - 7314, n=18) | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (9295 - 11467, n=18) | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (7357 - 9619, n=18) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (8914 - 10074, n=18) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr |
CrossMark / Overall | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1590 - 1742, n=17) | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1558 - 1684, n=17) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1727 - 1977, n=17) | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1251 - 1411, n=17) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (219 - 314, n=17) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (199.5 - 291, n=17) | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (468 - 559, n=19) | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 6766 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (104408 - 114336, n=19) | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (82846 - 89417, n=19) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (108842 - 117935, n=19) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (95 - 101.1, n=19) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
不仅是 三星 BM9C1PCIe4 NVMe 固态硬盘比去年的美光 2550 固态硬盘速度更慢,而且还有节流的趋势。如下图所示,在运行我们的 DiskSpd 循环测试时,传输速率会在 3400 MB/s 和 4700 MB/s 之间循环,而 Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 的传输速率则稳定在 ~5000 MB/s。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
在处理器性能方面,酷睿至尊 7 258V 比去年 Inspiron 的酷睿至尊 7 255H 慢,而在比较 Arc 140V 时,情况正好相反。 Arc 140V与 Arc 8.尽管处理器性能较慢,戴尔 16 Plus 2 合 1 却能将运行《最终幻想 XV》或《赛博朋克 2077》等高要求游戏的速度提高 35% 至 50%。
电源配置文件 | 图形得分 | 物理得分 | 综合得分 |
性能模式 | 10163 | 19741 | 3139 |
均衡模式 | 8556 (-16%) | 16859 (-15%) | 2576 (-18%) |
电池供电 | 9568 (-6%) | 16911 (-14%) | 2651 (-16%) |
如Fire Strike 上表所示,如果使用平衡模式而非性能模式,性能大约会下降 15%。
3DMark 11 Performance | 10966 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8829 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 4322 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
F1 24 | |
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V (54 - 99, n=22) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V (49.2 - 87, n=22) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V (34.4 - 66.4, n=23) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V (15.3 - 22, n=21) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 105.1 | 88.2 | 87.7 | 86 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 83.5 | 48.2 | 35.4 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 46.7 | 37.9 | 31.2 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 228 | 70 | 61 | 54.7 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 42.4 | 35.4 | 31.4 | 31 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 47.7 | 38.8 | 32.9 | 29 |
F1 24 (2024) | 84.4 | 77.4 | 60.4 | 19.7 |
排放量
系统噪音
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23 / 23 / 24.7 dB(A) |
Load |
| 32.5 / 45.6 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V | Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2550 1TB | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V, WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-512G-1101 | Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU | MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -6% | -3% | 3% | -12% | 7% | |
off / environment * | 23.2 | 22.9 1% | 23.3 -0% | 23.6 -2% | 23.8 -3% | 22.9 1% |
Idle Minimum * | 23 | 22.9 -0% | 23.3 -1% | 23.6 -3% | 25 -9% | 23 -0% |
Idle Average * | 23 | 22.9 -0% | 23.3 -1% | 23.6 -3% | 25 -9% | 23 -0% |
Idle Maximum * | 24.7 | 25 -1% | 25.7 -4% | 23.6 4% | 29.5 -19% | 23 7% |
Load Average * | 32.5 | 45.1 -39% | 40.2 -24% | 29.4 10% | 37.5 -15% | 23.8 27% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 42.6 | 44.9 -5% | 41.6 2% | 40.6 5% | 46.5 -9% | |
Load Maximum * | 45.6 | 44.9 2% | 41.6 9% | 40.6 11% | 56.1 -23% | 43.8 4% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 43.8 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
键盘和底板的表面温度热点分别达到 44 摄氏度和 39 摄氏度,比我们在同类竞争产品上记录的温度略高。 联想 Yoga 7 二合一 16ILL10.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.8 °C / 80.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (+1.2 °C / 2.2 F).
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Intel Arc Graphics 130V | MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -4% | 12% | 12% | -3% | 4% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 44 | 46.8 -6% | 42.6 3% | 40.9 7% | 52.8 -20% | 42.6 3% |
Maximum Bottom * | 39.4 | 45.6 -16% | 36.8 7% | 45.1 -14% | 42 -7% | 47.8 -21% |
Idle Upper Side * | 31.8 | 32.2 -1% | 26.4 17% | 23.8 25% | 30.6 4% | 27.4 14% |
Idle Bottom * | 34.2 | 31.4 8% | 26.6 22% | 23.5 31% | 29.6 13% | 27.8 19% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
CPU 平均时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | -- | 32 |
Prime95 压力 | 2.5 | 400 | 72 |
Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 2.0 | 1150 | 73 |
赛博朋克 2077》压力 | 1.0 | 1950 | 72 |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 0.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
怠速时的耗电量与我们去年在Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1上记录的耗电量相似。 Inspiron 16 7640 2 合 1因为它们共享多个类似组件。不过,当运行要求更高的负载时,戴尔 16 Plus 2 合 1 所需的功耗要低得多,因为酷睿至尊 7 258V 比酷睿至尊 7 155H 运行速度更慢,效率更高。
我们使用小巧(约 11 x 5 x 2.8 厘米)的 65 W USB-C 交流适配器测得的最大功耗为 67 W。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, , Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16" | Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Micron 2550 1TB, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V, WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-512G-1101, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -30% | 17% | 19% | -16% | 12% | |
Idle Minimum * | 7 | 6.1 13% | 4.2 40% | 5.3 24% | 5.4 23% | 5 29% |
Idle Average * | 13.2 | 13.5 -2% | 8.3 37% | 6.7 49% | 11 17% | 6.2 53% |
Idle Maximum * | 13.4 | 13.8 -3% | 9.5 29% | 7.3 46% | 11.2 16% | 14.7 -10% |
Load Average * | 43.9 | 63.6 -45% | 40.3 8% | 37.6 14% | 76.6 -74% | 49.9 -14% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 40.7 | 64.6 -59% | 40.8 -0% | 42.8 -5% | 49.2 -21% | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 44.9 | 67 -49% | 47.4 -6% | 44.6 1% | 61.1 -36% | |
Load Maximum * | 67.8 | 109.7 -62% | 59 13% | 64.1 5% | 91.8 -35% | 65 4% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 54.5 |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
电池容量小于去年的 Inspiron 16 7640 2 合 1,这对无线局域网的运行时间造成了负面影响,但也仅有两个多小时。
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 64 Wh | Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 90 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V, 70 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V, 76 Wh | MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M, 82 Wh | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, 68 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 29% | 126% | 21% | 3% | -14% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 533 | 686 29% | 1202 126% | 646 21% | 547 3% | 459 -14% |
Reader / Idle | 1310 | 935 | ||||
Load | 93 | 128 | 116 | |||
H.264 | 1181 |
笔记本检查评级
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1
- 06/14/2025 v8
Allen Ngo
Potential Competitors in Comparison
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory | Amazon: 1. $1,084.99 Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 Laptop, ... 2. $1,699.99 2025 Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 AI ... 3. $31.99 Artemis Shields Matte Anti G... List Price: 1500 USD | 2 kg | 16.99 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI Mini-LED | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,166.00 List Price: 1000 USD | 2.1 kg | 18.99 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI Mini-LED | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $830.00 Lenovo Yoga 7i 2-in-1 Laptop... 2. $849.99 Lenovo Yoga 7i 2-in-1 Busine... 3. $749.99 Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 Lightwe... List Price: 1000 USD | 1.9 kg | 15.85 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 226V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 130V ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,399.99 List Price: 1799€ | 1.7 kg | 12.8 mm | 16.00" 2880x1800 212 PPI OLED | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 ⎘ AMD Radeon 880M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,298.99 List Price: 1600 USD | 2.1 kg | 16.85 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $151.99 LCDOLED Replacement for HP E... 2. $24.95 mCover Case ONLY Compatible ... 3. $6.95 Keyboard Cover for hp Envy 2... List Price: 1300 USD | 1.8 kg | 18.3 mm | 16.00" 2880x1800 212 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.