Notebookcheck Logo

Redmi Note 11日评论。小米智能手机配备90赫兹OLED显示屏和1000尼特,价格绝对便宜

200欧元(约214美元)以下设备的显示参考。 对于一个不到200欧元(约214美元)的价格,Redmi Note 11具有非常有趣的技术配置。首先,非常明亮的AMOLED面板,包括其90赫兹的刷新率和出色的校准是一个独特的卖点。继续阅读,了解用户在哪些方面需要向小米手机妥协。
Smartphone Android
Redmi Note 11款智能手机评测

虽然Redmi Note 11属于低价的中档产品,但在显示屏方面,小米确实表现出色。Redmi Note 11系列中最实惠的机型于2月推出,拥有6.43英寸AMOLED显示屏,刷新率为90赫兹,最大亮度可达1000尼特。

它由一个 高通Snapdragon 680辅以LPDDR4X内存和UFS 2.2存储。你可以选择以下型号的变体。

Redmi Note 11| 64 GB| 4 GB RAM| 200欧元(约214美元)(建议零售价)。

Redmi Note 11| 128 GB| 4 GB RAM| 230欧元(约合人民币247元)(建议零售价)。

Redmi Note 11| 128 GB| 4 GB RAM| 260欧元(约合人民币279元)(建议零售价)。

内置的5000毫安时电池支持33瓦的快速充电,盒子里还包括一个合适的33瓦充电器。为了完善Redmi Note 11的功能,有一个侧置的指纹传感器和一个集成的3.5毫米音频插孔。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Redmi Note Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73) / Silver (Cortex-A53)
Graphics adapter
Memory
4096 MB 
Display
6.43 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 409 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, OLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 90 Hz
Storage
64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 64 GB 
, 42.6 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB (no eFAT), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, compass, OTG, Miracast, IR blaster
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.1, 4G: LTE FDD: 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/20/284G: LTE TDD:38/40/41, (B41 2535-2655 MHz); 3G: WCDMA:1/2/4/5/82G; GSM: 850 900 1800 1900 MHz, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.09 x 159.87 x 73.87
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, 26 mm) 8 MP (1/4", 1.12 µm) 2 MP (macro) 2 MP (depth), camera API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.5, 1/3.06", 1.0 µm)
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: virtual, case, USB cable, charger, MIUI 13, 12 Months Warranty, Widevine L1, SAR value: 0.596 W/​kg head, 0.956 W/​kg body, fanless
Weight
179 g, Power Supply: 114 g
Price
200 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
79.8 %
05/2022
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
SD 680, Adreno 610
179 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.43"2400x1080
75.1 %
05/2022
Motorola Moto G22
Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320
185 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
80.5 %
01/2022
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2
195 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2400x1080
77.6 %
05/2022
realme C35
T616, Mali-G57 MP1
189 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2408x1080
74.9 %
12/2021
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1
205 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720

保护壳 - 小米智能手机,带冲孔

Redmi Note 11款智能手机评测
Redmi Note 11款智能手机评测

重达179克的Redmi Note 11,有三种颜色可供选择。尽管在这个价格范围内,小米手机的制造质量非常令人印象深刻,但它并不给人以高级感。背面和框架都是由塑料制成的,这一点很明显。我们的星空蓝评测样品的高光表面几乎不能隐藏指纹。然而,选择黑色版本的用户将得到一个饱和的塑料表面。

这款通过IP53认证的红米手机在前面有一个扁平的OLED显示屏,它有一个宽大的 "下巴"。然而,在经济实惠的中档产品中,竞争对手也没有在显示屏和设备正面之间提供更好的比例。Redmi Note 11的正面约有84.5%是AMOLED面板。

Redmi Note 11款智能手机评测
Redmi Note 11款智能手机评测
Redmi Note 11款智能手机评测
Redmi Note 11款智能手机评测
Redmi Note 11款智能手机评测
Redmi Note 11款智能手机评测
Redmi Note 11款智能手机评测

尺寸比较

164 mm 75.8 mm 8.9 mm 205 g164 mm 75 mm 8.5 mm 185 g164.4 mm 75.6 mm 8.1 mm 189 g163.56 mm 75.78 mm 8.75 mm 195 g159.87 mm 73.87 mm 8.09 mm 179 g

连接性 -Redmi Note 11与3.5毫米音频插孔

鉴于低于200欧元(约214美元)的价格水平,Redmi Note 11在连接方面没有真正的批评点。该设备配备了Miracast、UFS存储、3.5毫米耳机插孔和一个红外辐射器。此外,内部存储可以通过microSD卡扩展到1TB。此外,外部外围设备和存储设备可以通过USB端口连接,但它只支持2.0标准。

右侧箱体(卡盘)
右侧箱体(卡盘)
左边的箱子侧面(按钮)
左边的箱子侧面(按钮)
顶壳侧面(3.5毫米音频插孔、扬声器、红外辐射器、麦克风)
顶壳侧面(3.5毫米音频插孔、扬声器、红外辐射器、麦克风)
底部外壳一侧(扬声器、USB端口、麦克风)
底部外壳一侧(扬声器、USB端口、麦克风)

微型SD卡读卡器

Redmi Note 11有一个三卡槽,这意味着两个nano SIM卡和一个microSD卡可以并行使用。使用我们的Angelbird V60参考卡,速度达到了一个不错的水平。在跨平台磁盘测试中,SD读卡器从我们的存储介质中获得了良好的传输率,大约25MB/s的复制速度也令人满意。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
47.8 MB/s ∼100% +93%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
24.74 MB/s ∼52%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
24.3 MB/s ∼51% -2%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
20.5 MB/s ∼43% -17%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
15.47 MB/s ∼32% -37%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø38.4 (25.6-49.1)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø32 (25-46.5)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø76.4 (38.4-81.8)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø75.5 (58.6-78.9)

软件 - 小米手机与Android 11

小米在13版上将Android 系统与内部的MIUI用户界面相结合。据报道,Redmi Note 11仍将以90天的间隔提供安全更新,直到2025年。除了即将升级到Android 12,它还应该得到更新到Android 13。我们无法找到制造商的官方信息。在我们审查时,由于小米手机运行Android 11和2022年1月起的安全补丁,因此没有达到最新版本。

在MIUI 13中,Redmi Note 11利用了重新设计的MiSans字体,各种新的小工具,以及对谷歌 "Material You "设计的支持。有点不必要的是MIUI 13界面内显示的广告横幅或广告,例如在安装应用程序时。然而,这些所谓的MSA(MIUI系统广告)通常可以很容易地被禁用。现有的臃肿软件,如游戏或Netflix,也可以被卸载。

Redmi Note 11款智能手机评测
Redmi Note 11款智能手机评测
Redmi Note 11款智能手机评测
Redmi Note 11款智能手机评测

通信和GNSS--小米智能手机带NFC功能

说到通信模块,小米使用了NFC芯片,用于通过谷歌支付进行非接触式支付,以及蓝牙5.0。此外,Redmi Note 11中的高通芯片组允许通过4G访问移动互联网。该X11调制解调器并不支持5G标准。

小米手机总共覆盖了12个LTE频段和德语区所有相关的LTE频率,包括LTE频段20和频段28。然而,经济型的红米机型并不推荐用于出国旅行,例如去美国,因为它没有13和25频段。

Note 11在Wi-Fi 5网络上提供坚实的传输速率。结合我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器,小米手机与低价的中档竞争者不相上下。尽管如此,在我们的测量中,稳定性是相当低的。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (72.5 - 1736, n=58, last 2 years)
609 MBit/s ∼100% +104%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
326 (305min - 332max) MBit/s ∼54% +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
298 (198min - 345max) MBit/s ∼49%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
244 (179min - 255max) MBit/s ∼40% -18%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (78.3 - 1710, n=58, last 2 years)
630 MBit/s ∼100% +96%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
370 (351min - 376max) MBit/s ∼59% +15%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
347 (309min - 366max) MBit/s ∼55% +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
322 (162min - 386max) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 transmit AX12
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1395, n=206, last 2 years)
487 MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
42.9 (21min - 65max) MBit/s ∼9%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1348, n=206, last 2 years)
475 MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
50.4 (41min - 57max) MBit/s ∼11%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360380Tooltip
; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø297 (198-345)
; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø323 (162-386)
地点在室内
地点在室内
地点在户外
地点在户外

为了在实践中评估该设备的跟踪能力,我们用Garmin Venu 2记录了一条路线,以便进行比较。Redmi Note 11通过GPS(L1)、GLONASS、BeiDou和Galileo(E1)确定其位置。室外的卫星定位速度很快,精确度约为4米。即使在室内,小米手机也能快速而准确地确定其位置。

路径的偏差很小,这意味着中端手机和智能手表的路线往往是相同的。不过,详细的GPS日志显示,红米手机有轻微的不准确之处,特别是在改变方向时。

定位:Redmi Note 11 vs. Garmin Venu 2
定位:Redmi Note 11 vs. Garmin Venu 2

电话和通话质量 -Redmi Note 11,具有双SIM卡功能

Redmi Note 11款智能手机评测
Redmi Note 11款智能手机评测

这款双SIM卡手机支持两张nano SIM卡以及VoLTE。通话质量处于良好水平,即使在扬声器模式下,这款经济型中档手机也能让视频通话中的参与者明白地交流。

照相机 - 小米智能手机,5千万像素

用Redmi Note 11拍摄的自拍
用Redmi Note 11拍摄的自拍

位于正面打孔处的1300万像素摄像头,在照片模式下可以拍出扎实的自拍。三星S5K3L6传感器再现的主体略显柔和,而且相当暗淡,曝光也可以调得更好。

Redmi Note 11的后置四摄像头系统包括一个来自三星(S5KJN1)的5000万像素主传感器,一个800万像素超广角镜头,以及两个用于拍摄微距和深度照片的200万像素传感器。三星ISOCELL JN1的传感器尺寸为1/2.76英寸,它的光圈为f/1.8,在Redmi Note 11。默认情况下,照片是在像素分层模式下拍摄的,所以图像是12.5MP而不是50MP。

对于这个价格范围来说,结果是比较体面的--我们非常喜欢在非常好的光线条件下,特别是用这台负担得起的中档手机拍摄的照片。颜色也是引人注目的,生动但不过度饱和的表现。在使用ColorChecker Passport进行的测量中,我们无法确定任何重大偏差(DeltaE偏差>10)。然而,图像清晰度在非常远的物体上受到影响,而且动态范围也相当低。在弱光环境下必须做出明显的妥协,尽管与其他同价位的智能手机相比,被摄体呈现出更清晰的效果。 这个价格范围内的智能手机配备了三星ISOCELL JN1的智能手机。

凭借118度的视野,包括GalaxyCore GC08A3传感器的超广角镜头可以捕捉到大量的图像内容。然而,我们在这里看到在质量方面有很大的改进空间。照片有许多图像错误,而且锐度水平很低。尽管如此,超广角镜头的质量在这个价格范围内仍然略高于平均水平。

Note 11只能以30帧/秒的全高清质量录制视频--这也是Note 11的一个限制。 骁龙680的限制,它不支持UHD选项。然而,该设备糟糕的稳定功能也不完全使小米手机适合录制视频。拍摄时在广角和超广角镜头之间切换,在红米手机上是不可能的。

超广角
广角
2倍变焦
10倍变焦(最大)
Redmi Note 11款智能手机评测
Redmi Note 11款智能手机评测
Redmi Note 11款智能手机评测
Redmi Note 11款智能手机评测

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide angleWide angleLow lightUltra-wide angle5x zoom
click to load images
ColorChecker
5.4 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
2 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 11: 5.35 ∆E min: 1.97 - max: 8.65 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.4 ∆E
55 ∆E
39.6 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
45.2 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
35.7 ∆E
43.8 ∆E
28 ∆E
66.2 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
48.6 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
76.8 ∆E
44 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
93.7 ∆E
71 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 11: 47.18 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 93.71 ∆E

附件和保修 -Redmi Note 11附带充电器

Redmi Note 11的33瓦充电器
Redmi Note 11的33瓦充电器

这款低价的中档手机配备了一个模块化的33瓦充电器,一条数据和充电线,一个外壳,一个SIM卡针,以及一份包含保修条件的快速入门指南。此外,还默认安装了一个屏幕保护膜。

制造商提供12个月的 保修对其手机进行保修。

输入设备和处理 - 小米智能手机,180赫兹

电容式触摸屏能迅速而精确地检测到输入,大猩猩3号玻璃的滑行特性同样引人注目。同时,内置的AMOLED面板反应灵敏,采样率高达180赫兹,而它的刷新率为90赫兹,这使得动画和滚动看起来令人愉悦地流畅。

集成在电源按钮上的主动式指纹扫描仪提供生物识别安全。它操作迅速,并提供良好的识别率。通过前置摄像头的面部识别来解锁设备也同样快速,但这种二维方法不太安全。

Redmi Note 11款智能手机评测
Redmi Note 11款智能手机评测
Redmi Note 11款智能手机评测

显示屏 -Redmi Note 11,采用AMOLED显示屏

子像素网格
子像素网格

Redmi Note 11的6.43英寸点阵显示器是基于AMOLED技术。你可以将其刷新率设置为60或90赫兹。自适应控制,如在旗舰机上看到的那种 旗舰机这里不提供。

这家中国制造商没有正式宣传HDR10认证,但根据 "DRM信息 "应用程序,OLED面板的分辨率为2400x1080像素,支持HDR内容。考虑到我们测量的1010cd/m²(APL18)的亮度,用户也应该从中受益。使用完全白色的背景,小米手机管理的峰值亮度为702cd/m²,在这个价格范围内同样出色。点阵显示器的亮度分布非常均匀,这一点也值得一提。

由于其技术,Redmi Note 11使用90至171赫兹的低频率的脉冲宽度调制(PWM)进行亮度控制。小米智能手机中的OLED闪烁从最大亮度的55%开始,以恒定的90赫兹运行,振幅曲线非常低且均匀。我们在设置菜单中没有找到直流调光模式。

694
cd/m²
691
cd/m²
700
cd/m²
697
cd/m²
702
cd/m²
708
cd/m²
705
cd/m²
706
cd/m²
703
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 708 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 700.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.45 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 702 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.3
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
95.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.2
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.43
Motorola Moto G22
IPS LCD, 1600x720, 6.50
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
TFT-LCD, 2400x1080, 6.60
realme C35
IPS, 2408x1080, 6.60
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
IPS LCD, 1600x720, 6.50
Screen
-188%
-108%
-165%
-171%
Brightness middle
702
451
-36%
504
-28%
585
-17%
446
-36%
Brightness
701
431
-39%
499
-29%
558
-20%
423
-40%
Brightness Distribution
98
90
-8%
91
-7%
89
-9%
88
-10%
Black Level *
0.5
0.72
0.6
0.29
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1
5.82
-482%
3.3
-230%
4.4
-340%
4.94
-394%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.3
9.3
-304%
6
-161%
8.77
-281%
8.81
-283%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.4
5
-257%
4.1
-193%
5.9
-321%
5.1
-264%
Gamma
2.2 100%
2.776 79%
2.28 96%
2.228 99%
2.145 103%
CCT
6520 100%
7683 85%
7041 92%
8001 81%
7890 82%
Contrast
902
700
975
1538

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 171.4 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 171.4 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 171.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21751 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最小显示亮度
闵行区。
25%的显示亮度
25%
50%的显示亮度
50%
75%的显示亮度
75%
最大手动显示亮度
100%

用固定的变焦水平和不同的亮度设置进行一系列的测量

说到显示屏,Redmi Note 11并不缺乏任何配置选项。用户可以从三个不同的配置文件中进行选择,并根据个人喜好定制色温。然而,个别的显示参数,如饱和度或伽玛,是无法调整的。

在我们用CalMAN软件和分光光度计进行的测试中,AMOLED面板被证明是非常好的校准,它在 "标准 "配置文件中几乎没有显示任何颜色偏差。由于OLED技术,个别像素可以完全关闭,因此实现了 "绝对 "的黑色,并且对比度(理论上)趋于无限大。

色彩准确性(目标色彩空间:sRGB,配置文件:标准)。
色彩准确性(目标色彩空间:sRGB,配置文件:标准)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:sRGB,配置文件:标准)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:sRGB,配置文件:标准)。
灰度(目标色彩空间:sRGB,配置文件:标准)。
灰度(目标色彩空间:sRGB,配置文件:标准)。
色彩饱和度(目标色彩空间:sRGB,配置文件:标准)
色彩饱和度(目标色彩空间:sRGB,配置文件:标准)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.635 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.831 ms rise
↘ 0.8045 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.135 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.121 ms rise
↘ 1.148 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (36.7 ms).

由于高亮度,Redmi Note 11也是日常户外使用的最佳装备。然而,这里应该激活自动亮度功能。否则,小米手机会停在445cd/m2。即使在阳光直射下和玻璃表面的伴随反射下,屏幕内容仍然清晰可辨。

AMOLED面板的视角稳定性非常好,只有在非常平坦的视角下才会有明显的亮度损失。

Redmi Note 11款智能手机评测
Redmi Note 11款智能手机评测
Redmi Note 11款智能手机评测

性能 -Redmi Note 11,配备高通SoC

A高通Snapdragon 680Redmi Note 11的动力。该SoC采用6纳米工艺制造,有四个Cortex-A73内核(2.4GHz)和四个Cortex-A53内核(1.8GHz)。一个Adreno 610作为图形单元被集成。

在我们的基准测试包中,红米手机排在Poco M4 Pro之后,尽管后者的内存也多一点。与它的兄弟姐妹机型相比,Geekbench中的单核速率特别低。

Geekbench 5.4
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=258, last 2 years)
681 Points ∼100% +77%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
598 Points ∼88% +56%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
384 Points ∼56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (374 - 384, n=6)
380 Points ∼56% -1%
realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
374 Points ∼55% -3%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
298 Points ∼44% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
178 Points ∼26% -54%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
172 Points ∼25% -55%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=258, last 2 years)
2225 Points ∼100% +28%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1809 Points ∼81% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1738 Points ∼78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (1557 - 1738, n=6)
1629 Points ∼73% -6%
realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1557 Points ∼70% -10%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1184 Points ∼53% -32%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1087 Points ∼49% -37%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
947 Points ∼43% -46%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (111952 - 1041980, n=113, last 2 years)
556293 Points ∼100% +121%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
353908 Points ∼64% +40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
252044 Points ∼45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (207780 - 252044, n=2)
229912 Points ∼41% -9%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
111952 Points ∼20% -56%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 18567, n=152, last 2 years)
10221 Points ∼100% +33%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
9402 Points ∼92% +22%
realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
8730 Points ∼85% +13%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
8066 Points ∼79% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
7694 Points ∼75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (6679 - 8730, n=6)
7361 Points ∼72% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
5739 Points ∼56% -25%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
4922 Points ∼48% -36%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (226 - 1169, n=55, last 2 years)
735 Points ∼100% +89%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
388 Points ∼53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (327 - 413, n=3)
376 Points ∼51% -3%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
232 Points ∼32% -40%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (895 - 8753, n=172, last 2 years)
4286 Points ∼100% +57%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3268 Points ∼76% +19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2738 Points ∼64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (2573 - 2738, n=3)
2629 Points ∼61% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1637 Points ∼38% -40%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1226 Points ∼29% -55%
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (1542 - 19657, n=172, last 2 years)
7589 Points ∼100% +31%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
6361 Points ∼84% +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
5794 Points ∼76%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (5667 - 5794, n=3)
5733 Points ∼76% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
3345 Points ∼44% -42%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
2565 Points ∼34% -56%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (1012 - 9044, n=172, last 2 years)
4900 Points ∼100% +28%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
4589 Points ∼94% +20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
3824 Points ∼78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (3424 - 3824, n=3)
3577 Points ∼73% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1836 Points ∼37% -52%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1210 Points ∼25% -68%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (478 - 26312, n=172, last 2 years)
7547 Points ∼100% +246%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2929 Points ∼39% +34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2183 Points ∼29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (2123 - 2183, n=3)
2163 Points ∼29% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1263 Points ∼17% -42%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1017 Points ∼13% -53%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (718 - 2392, n=172, last 2 years)
1389 Points ∼100% +16%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1334 Points ∼96% +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1199 Points ∼86%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (917 - 1199, n=3)
1061 Points ∼76% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
947 Points ∼68% -21%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
718 Points ∼52% -40%
AImark - Score v2.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 286905, n=135, last 2 years)
58211 Points ∼100% +1065%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
9008 Points ∼15% +80%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
4995 Points ∼9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (4852 - 4995, n=3)
4902 Points ∼8% -2%
realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
4852 Points ∼8% -3%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
4725 Points ∼8% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
4453 Points ∼8% -11%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
4323 Points ∼7% -13%
UL Procyon AI Inference - Overall Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (1555 - 82801, n=67, last 2 years)
16949 Points ∼100% +249%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
6400 Points ∼38% +32%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
4853 Points ∼29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (4370 - 4853, n=2)
4612 Points ∼27% -5%
realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
4370 Points ∼26% -10%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
4209 Points ∼25% -13%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
2514 Points ∼15% -48%
VRMark - Amber Room
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 7495, n=44, last 2 years)
3192 Score ∼100% +138%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2970 Score ∼93% +121%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1342 Score ∼42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
 
1342 Score ∼42% 0%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1104 Score ∼35% -18%

Redmi Note 11在图形基准测试中的表现也很稳定。虽然Poco M4 Pro偶尔会有两倍于其 Dimensity 810骁龙680在比较领域方面的表现仍然令人满意。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal: offscreen Overall Score
Basemark GPU 1.2: OpenGL Medium Native | 1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen | Vulkan Medium Native | 1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
348 Points ∼100% +181%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
126 Points ∼36% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
124 Points ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
117 Points ∼34% -6%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
112 Points ∼32% -10%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
360 Points ∼100% +183%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
129 Points ∼36% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
127 Points ∼35%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
116 Points ∼32% -9%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
108 Points ∼30% -15%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1210 Points ∼100% +178%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
464 Points ∼38% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
435 Points ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
426 Points ∼35% -2%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
417 Points ∼34% -4%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1235 Points ∼100% +176%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
463 Points ∼37% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
447 Points ∼36%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
446 Points ∼36% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
428 Points ∼35% -4%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Points ∼0% -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2882 Points ∼100% +21%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2628 Points ∼91% +11%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2492 Points ∼86% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2375 Points ∼82%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2145 Points ∼74% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2098 Points ∼73% -12%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2396 Points ∼100% +107%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1155 Points ∼48%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1138 Points ∼47% -1%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
919 Points ∼38% -20%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
839 Points ∼35% -27%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
584 Points ∼24% -49%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2489 Points ∼100% +99%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1294 Points ∼52% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1253 Points ∼50%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1074 Points ∼43% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
954 Points ∼38% -24%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
657 Points ∼26% -48%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3804 Points ∼100% +48%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3036 Points ∼80% +18%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2683 Points ∼71% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2573 Points ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2109 Points ∼55% -18%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1283 Points ∼34% -50%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2570 Points ∼100% +114%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1199 Points ∼47%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1185 Points ∼46% -1%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
939 Points ∼37% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
736 Points ∼29% -39%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
460 Points ∼18% -62%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2770 Points ∼100% +102%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1372 Points ∼50%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1353 Points ∼49% -1%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1109 Points ∼40% -19%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
867 Points ∼31% -37%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
536 Points ∼19% -61%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3553 Points ∼100% +34%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2957 Points ∼83% +11%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2812 Points ∼79% +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2654 Points ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2048 Points ∼58% -23%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1250 Points ∼35% -53%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3846 Points ∼100% +93%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1995 Points ∼52%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1994 Points ∼52% 0%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1471 Points ∼38% -26%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1126 Points ∼29% -44%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
722 Points ∼19% -64%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3777 Points ∼100% +79%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2132 Points ∼56% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2113 Points ∼56%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1656 Points ∼44% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1283 Points ∼34% -39%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
797 Points ∼21% -62%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2714 Points ∼100% +99%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1365 Points ∼50%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1332 Points ∼49% -2%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1103 Points ∼41% -19%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
863 Points ∼32% -37%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
453 Points ∼17% -67%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2546 Points ∼100% +114%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1188 Points ∼47%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1159 Points ∼46% -2%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
935 Points ∼37% -21%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
738 Points ∼29% -38%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
383 Points ∼15% -68%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3529 Points ∼100% +32%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2959 Points ∼84% +10%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2789 Points ∼79% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2683 Points ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2031 Points ∼58% -24%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1265 Points ∼36% -53%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3965 Points ∼100% +90%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2166 Points ∼55% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2085 Points ∼53%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1710 Points ∼43% -18%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1273 Points ∼32% -39%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
921 Points ∼23% -56%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4014 Points ∼100% +108%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2046 Points ∼51% +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1931 Points ∼48%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1518 Points ∼38% -21%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1142 Points ∼28% -41%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
851 Points ∼21% -56%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3801 Points ∼100% +47%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3063 Points ∼81% +18%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2722 Points ∼72% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2589 Points ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2032 Points ∼53% -22%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1292 Points ∼34% -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
56 fps ∼100% +51%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
37 fps ∼66%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
37 fps ∼66% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
33 fps ∼59% -11%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
29 fps ∼52% -22%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps ∼41% -38%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
66 fps ∼100% +57%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
42 fps ∼64%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
41 fps ∼62% -2%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps ∼39% -38%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
24 fps ∼36% -43%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
22 fps ∼33% -48%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
36 fps ∼100% +112%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
28 fps ∼78% +65%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
20 fps ∼56% +18%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
18 fps ∼50% +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps ∼47%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps ∼39% -18%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps ∼100% +100%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
22 fps ∼55% +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
16 fps ∼40% -20%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps ∼40% -20%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
12 fps ∼30% -40%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps ∼100% +77%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
19 fps ∼83% +46%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
14 fps ∼61% +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps ∼57%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
12 fps ∼52% -8%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.7 fps ∼38% -33%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps ∼100% +63%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps ∼62%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
16 fps ∼62% 0%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.9 fps ∼38% -38%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
9.4 fps ∼36% -41%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7.5 fps ∼29% -53%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps ∼100% +78%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps ∼85% +51%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.3 fps ∼56%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7.1 fps ∼55% -3%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5.4 fps ∼42% -26%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5 fps ∼38% -32%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps ∼100% +86%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.6 fps ∼54%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8.2 fps ∼51% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6 fps ∼38% -30%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.9 fps ∼37% -31%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3.5 fps ∼22% -59%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.3 fps ∼100% +86%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7 fps ∼75% +40%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5.1 fps ∼55% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5 fps ∼54%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5 fps ∼54% 0%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.4 fps ∼37% -32%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.2 fps ∼100% +94%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3.3 fps ∼53% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.2 fps ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2.2 fps ∼35% -31%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.2 fps ∼35% -31%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1.5 fps ∼24% -53%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps ∼100% +70%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps ∼73% +25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.8 fps ∼59%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8.6 fps ∼57% -2%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7 fps ∼47% -20%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.4 fps ∼36% -39%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps ∼100% +73%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.8 fps ∼58%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
9.7 fps ∼57% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6.2 fps ∼36% -37%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.1 fps ∼36% -38%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4 fps ∼24% -59%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal / Overall Score
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
959 Points ∼100% +184%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
386 Points ∼40% +14%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
348 Points ∼36% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
338 Points ∼35%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
201 Points ∼21% -41%
Basemark GPU 1.2 / OpenGL Medium Native
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24.03 (7.17min - 39.18max) fps ∼100% +112%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
14.45 (5.13min - 43.77max) fps ∼60% +27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11.34 (7.21min - 29.04max) fps ∼47%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
11.3 fps ∼47% 0%
Basemark GPU 1.2 / OpenGL Medium Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25.78 (8.99min - 41.58max) fps ∼100% +104%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
12.8 fps ∼50% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12.63 (8.82min - 26.42max) fps ∼49%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
9.12 (3min - 25.95max) fps ∼35% -28%
Basemark GPU 1.2 / Vulkan Medium Native
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25.82 (9.11min - 45.85max) fps ∼100% +88%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13.74 (7.59min - 40.96max) fps ∼53%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
11.2 fps ∼43% -18%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
fps ∼0% -100%
Basemark GPU 1.2 / Vulkan Medium Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29.57 (10.34min - 49.42max) fps ∼100% +152%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
12.54 fps ∼42% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11.75 (6.45min - 34.52max) fps ∼40%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 182.6, n=173, last 2 years)
63.3 Points ∼100% +45%
realme C35 (Chrome 101)
45.399 Points ∼72% +4%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
43.83 Points ∼69% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101)
43.525 Points ∼69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (40.7 - 43.5, n=3)
42.1 Points ∼67% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F (Chrome96)
21.24 Points ∼34% -51%
Motorola Moto G22 (Chrome101)
21.156 Points ∼33% -51%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 414, n=167, last 2 years)
115.5 Points ∼100% +63%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
84.8 Points ∼73% +20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101)
70.954 Points ∼61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (69 - 71, n=2)
70 Points ∼61% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F (Chrome96)
32.46 Points ∼28% -54%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 244, n=159, last 2 years)
62 runs/min ∼100% +56%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
39.8 runs/min ∼64% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101)
39.64 runs/min ∼64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (37.5 - 40.1, n=3)
39.1 runs/min ∼63% -1%
realme C35
34.44 runs/min ∼56% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F (Chrome96)
16.3 runs/min ∼26% -59%
Motorola Moto G22 (Chrome101)
15.01 runs/min ∼24% -62%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 265, n=180, last 2 years)
92.9 Points ∼100% +39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101)
67 Points ∼72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (60 - 67, n=2)
63.5 Points ∼68% -5%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
62 Points ∼67% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F (Chrome96)
38 Points ∼41% -43%
Motorola Moto G22 (Chrome101)
37 Points ∼40% -45%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (3526 - 65969, n=187, last 2 years)
23737 Points ∼100% +82%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
19010 Points ∼80% +46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101)
13056 Points ∼55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (10729 - 13141, n=4)
12328 Points ∼52% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F (Chrome96)
5849 Points ∼25% -55%
Motorola Moto G22 (Chrome101)
5648 Points ∼24% -57%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Motorola Moto G22 (Chrome101)
9051.2 ms * ∼100% -180%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F (Chrome96)
8472 ms * ∼94% -162%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101)
3234.1 ms * ∼36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (3183 - 3234, n=2)
3209 ms * ∼35% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 15230, n=185, last 2 years)
3135 ms * ∼35% +3%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
2410 ms * ∼27% +25%

* ... smaller is better

在日常使用中,Redmi Note 11大部分时间都能顺利运行,但轻微的卡顿现象总是存在。在这个价格范围内,系统性能绝对没问题,应用程序的加载时间也很短,令人欣喜。这也是由于UFS存储所提供的适度的读写速率所致。尤其是在Redmi Note 11中的写入率非常好。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11Motorola Moto G22Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5Grealme C35Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127FAverage 64 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-80%
-3%
-10%
-70%
-21%
-2%
Sequential Read 256KB
895.34
215.45
-76%
964
8%
907.1
1%
302.3
-66%
771 ?(511 - 907, n=3)
-14%
942 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=249, last 2 years)
5%
Sequential Write 256KB
519.23
112.78
-78%
471
-9%
271.1
-48%
74.5
-86%
304 ?(120.6 - 519, n=3)
-41%
482 ?(11.9 - 1485, n=249, last 2 years)
-7%
Random Read 4KB
172.95
39.32
-77%
148.8
-14%
137.8
-20%
77.8
-55%
133.1 ?(88.5 - 173, n=3)
-23%
168.3 ?(13.5 - 345, n=249, last 2 years)
-3%
Random Write 4KB
163.29
16.34
-90%
171.8
5%
206.4
26%
47.21
-71%
155 ?(95.4 - 206, n=3)
-5%
162.3 ?(56.5 - 458, n=250, last 2 years)
-1%

游戏--小米智能手机实现60帧画面

虽然内置的Adreno 610虽然内置的Adreno 610有点过时,但其图形性能,我们用我们的合作伙伴GameBench进行了测试。的测试,对于偶尔的Android 游戏来说应该是足够的。

PUBG Mobile只能以最低的细节进行游戏--不能选择HD和UHD设置--但射击游戏的显示速度相对稳定在25帧。使用最低的细节设置可以达到30帧。

Armajet是我们的第二个测试游戏,也被限制在30帧,这有点令人惊讶,因为竞技场射击游戏理论上支持144帧,而其他配备Adreno 610的智能手机,如 realme 9i等,都能达到60帧。在《英雄联盟》中情况要好一些。荒野大镖客》的情况较好,使用Redmi Note 11,帧率可以达到60帧。除了在《Armajet》中出现强烈的下滑外,两款游戏的渲染都没有重大的FPS波动。

Redmi Note 11款智能手机评测
Redmi Note 11款智能手机评测
Redmi Note 11款智能手机评测
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
; Armajet: Ø29.1 (2-31)
; League of Legends: Wild Rift: Ø60 (50-61)
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø29.9 (28-31)
; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø24.8 (19-26)

排放--小米手机依然很酷

温度

Redmi Note 11款智能手机评测

Redmi Note 11并不存在发热的问题。在空闲使用和负载情况下,机箱的表面温度几乎不值得一提。我们测量到小米手机的最高温度为33℃(约91°F)。

我们还测试了骁龙680的我们还通过GFX基准的压力测试来测试骁龙680的稳定性,该测试连续30次重复相应的OpenGL ES 3.1场景。之后,Note 11必须在3DMark压力测试中证明其能力。

高通SoC的性能在两个测试场景中都只出现了最小的节流--但Wild Life Extreme压力测试却无法执行。因此,我们无法确定高负荷下的帧率下降。

Max. Load
 32.8 °C32.4 °C32.1 °C 
 32.3 °C31.1 °C31.9 °C 
 31.4 °C32 °C29.6 °C 
Maximum: 32.8 °C
Average: 31.7 °C
29.6 °C30.7 °C30.9 °C
28.6 °C31 °C31.6 °C
28.7 °C30.3 °C30.7 °C
Maximum: 31.6 °C
Average: 30.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  26.9 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life stress test

3DMark - Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 (7.36min) % ∼100% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
99.2 (2.57min) % ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.1 (2.66min) % ∼99%
01234567Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.68 (2.66-2.69)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash: Ø7.38 (7.36-7.39)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.59 (2.57-2.59)
Redmi Note 11款智能手机评测
Redmi Note 11款智能手机评测

发言人

Redmi Note 11配备了一个双扬声器系统,除了立体感之外,还能提供足够大的声音--我们测量的最大音量为89分贝。此外,我们的测量结果显示,红米手机的中音和高音有坚实的频率响应。低音并没有真正出现在声音模式中。尽管如此,对于这个价格范围来说,仍然没有什么可抱怨的。

通过无线或有线耳机的音频体验也是如此。Note 11有一个3.5毫米的音频插孔,可以重现更多的低音,而且噪音水平在一个良好的范围内,信噪比值为80dBFS。除了插孔,该设备还具有蓝牙5.0功能,带有SBC、AAC、aptX HD和aptX Adaptive,以及LDAC和LHDC编解码。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.436.6252828.23132.625.44027.728503437.8632725.48023.625.910022.328.612517.730.516016.145.320012.845.225013.150.73151257.3400960.85001168.463010.771.180010.374.4100010.973.7125012.176.4160011.878.620001278.9250011.878.4315011.977.7400012.978.7500013.379.7630013.478800013.572.71000013.670.71250014.868.61600014.161.2SPL24.689N0.676.6median 12.8median 71.1Delta1.112.735.93326.426.123.723.526.926.831.732.323.228.721.222.41826.413.930.716.141.411.740.912.246.79.350.69.153.39.259.79.758.910.663.510.970.911.970.61271.212.674.412.776.712.179.212.682.413.382.913.278.613.674.313.77313.670.613.666.324.489.30.569.3median 12.6median 70.61.511.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Note 11Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.4% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命 - 小米手机,5000毫安时

能源消耗

红米智能手机有一个5000毫安时的电池,使用附带的33瓦充电器和MMT技术,可以在大约70分钟内完全充电,其中两个充电电流平行流动。

闲置电源的消耗仍然需要一点优化。对于一款6.43英寸的智能手机来说,Note 11的耗电量接近2瓦,相对较高。然而,在负载下,功耗非常低,特别是考虑到高亮度。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.03 / 0.14 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.06 / 1.93 / 1.96 Watt
Load midlight 2.87 / 3.85 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G22
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
5000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-3%
-7%
-23%
6%
-23%
Idle Minimum *
1.06
0.9
15%
0.51
52%
1.4
-32%
0.93 ?(0.8 - 1.06, n=2)
12%
0.905 ?(0.12 - 2.5, n=194, last 2 years)
15%
Idle Average *
1.93
1.2
38%
1.96
-2%
1.9
2%
1.515 ?(1.1 - 1.93, n=2)
22%
1.663 ?(0.65 - 3.6, n=194, last 2 years)
14%
Idle Maximum *
1.96
1.5
23%
2.01
-3%
2.1
-7%
1.73 ?(1.5 - 1.96, n=2)
12%
1.886 ?(0.69 - 3.7, n=194, last 2 years)
4%
Load Average *
2.87
4.5
-57%
3.86
-34%
3.8
-32%
2.89 ?(2.87 - 2.9, n=2)
-1%
4.48 ?(2.1 - 7.74, n=194, last 2 years)
-56%
Load Maximum *
3.85
5.2
-35%
5.62
-46%
5.6
-45%
4.43 ?(3.85 - 5, n=2)
-15%
7.32 ?(3.56 - 11.9, n=194, last 2 years)
-90%

* ... smaller is better

Energy consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G: Ø3.03 (1.109-6.23)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 810: Ø2.92 (1.037-5.3)

Energy consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.88 (2.54-5.23)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 810; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.11 (2.88-3.5)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; Idle 1min: Ø1.302 (1.117-1.614)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 810; Idle 1min: Ø1.176 (1.05-1.745)

电池寿命

小米手机的电池运行时间处于良好水平,但我们的低价中档设备的对比设备总体上持续时间更长一些。通过使用调整后的150cd/m²的显示亮度,它们可以得到最好的比较。

在刷新率为90赫兹的情况下,Redmi Note 11在我们的Wi-Fi测试中能维持14小时以上,在视频测试中能维持近18小时。这使小米手机落后于其Poco M4 Pro但我们的对比设备表现在类似的水平。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)