Notebookcheck Logo

小米Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G智能手机评论:中端产品中的2亿像素摄像头

像素的过度使用。 小米Redmi Note 12 Pro+提供快速充电,大量存储,最重要的是,它有一个非常高的分辨率的摄像头。这样做的目的是要成为中端产品的国王。在我们的评论中,我们看看小米是否已经成功,以及与Note 12 Pro相比,大幅增加的费用是否值得。
5G Android ARM Smartphone
小米Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G

去年,小米推出了Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G,这是其受欢迎的Redmi Note 系列中速度更快、价格更高的机型。但其功能并没有真正弥补高额的附加费用。

今年,一切都应该是不同的:Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G使用的SoC与 Note 12 Pro 5G但也提供了相当多的优势,包括超快的充电技术,更多的存储空间和一个带OIS的2亿像素主摄像头。

70欧元(约75美元)的附加费用乍看之下似乎相当公平。当然,我们的评论是研究这种附加费用是否真的合理,即设备的加载速度是否真的快了很多,照片是否真的看起来更好,以及Redmi Note 12 Pro+是否能够与其他制造商的类似价格的智能手机竞争。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G (Redmi Note 12 Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 1080 8 x 2 - 2.6 GHz, Cortex-A78 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, OLED, Gorilla Glass 5, 240 Hz sampling rate, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB 
, 200 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: 3.5mm, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B6/​B8/​B19), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B32/​B38/​B40/​B41/​B66), 5G (n1/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n20/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n66/​n77/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9 x 162.9 x 76
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 120 Watt charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 200 MPix f/​1.65, phase comparison-AF, OIS, dual LED-flash, Videos @2160p/​30fps, Videos @720p/​960fps (Camera 1); 8.0MP, f/​2.2, wide angle lens (Camera 2); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, macro lens (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.5, 1/3.06", 1.0µm, Videos @1080p/​60fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers (hybrid), charger, USB cable, SIM tool, silicone bumper, 24 Months Warranty, Dual-SIM, IP53-certified, fanless
Weight
210.5 g
Price
500 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
85.1 %
06/2023
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4
210.5 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080
85.4 %
04/2023
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4
187 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080
86 %
05/2023
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5
202 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.40"2340x1080
81.7 %
11/2022
Nokia X30
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
185 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.43"2400x1080
85.8 %
09/2022
Google Pixel 6a
Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20
178 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.10"2400x1080

从视觉上看,即使是专家也很难区分。Redmi Note 12 Pro和Note 12 Pro Plus:有相同的颜色,相机镜头的配置也完全相同。

我们的测试设备是蓝色的,所以它有一个闪亮的哑光背面,而黑色和白色则是光面的。然而,外壳几乎厚了一毫米,Pro+明显更重。210.5克,与其他智能手机相比,它的重量很大。

此外,框架是由塑料制成的,正面由大猩猩5号玻璃保护。该智能手机通过了IP53认证,即防尘和防水。该Galaxy A54通过了IP67认证,这意味着对液体的全面保护,所以它显然是领先的。

小米Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
小米Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
小米Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
小米Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
小米Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G

尺寸比较

162.9 mm 76 mm 9 mm 210.5 g162.9 mm 76 mm 7.9 mm 187 g158.9 mm 73.9 mm 8 mm 185 g158.2 mm 76.7 mm 8.2 mm 202 g152.2 mm 71.8 mm 8.9 mm 178 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备 - 大量的数据空间

256GB的UFS 2.2闪存的数据对于这个价格范围来说是很慷慨的,但不是唯一的,因为 一加诺德2TNothing Phone (1)去年也提供了同样多的存储空间,在某些情况下速度更快。另一方面,直接比较的设备在这里落伍了。你可以在大多数智能手机中获得8GB的内存,价格约为500欧元(约500美元)。

没有用于内存扩展的microSD插槽,但有2个SIM卡插槽。然而,该智能手机不提供eSIM支持。

左边:没有端口
左边:没有端口
右边:待机按钮,音量控制
右边:待机按钮,音量控制
底部:SIM卡插槽、麦克风、USB-C接口、扬声器
底部:SIM卡插槽、麦克风、USB-C接口、扬声器
顶部:红外端口、麦克风、扬声器、3.5毫米音频
顶部:红外端口、麦克风、扬声器、3.5毫米音频

软件--广告和预装的应用程序

小米使用MiUI 14作为操作系统,该系统仍然基于Android 12。系统更新应该可以到Android 14,安全补丁可以到2027年。就后者而言,经验表明,在某个时间点之后,它们只能每3个月提供一次。在审查时,安全更新是从2023年5月开始的,因此仍然是相当最新的。

与vanillaAndroid 相比,小米的界面在某些方面有所改变。设置已经被重新安排和分类,快速设置和通知的下拉菜单是独立的,就像在Apple 。应用程序在安装前接受安全检查,系统在调整关键设置时进行双重检查。

在某些情况下,系统甚至会显示广告,但如果你知道怎么做,可以禁用.小米预装了许多自己的工具和应用程序,包括一些第三方广告应用程序。

小米Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G的软件
小米Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G的软件
小米Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G的软件

通信和GNSS - 大量的蜂窝频率

WiFi 6是该设备支持的最快的WiFi标准。与我们的华硕ROG Rapture AXE11000参考路由器同步,其速度相对较低且波动较大。平均近750-800MBit/s,Redmi Note 12 Pro+应该能够使大多数家庭网络达到最大。

在4G和5G网络中都支持众多的频率,所以你也可以用Redmi Note 12 Pro+旅行。然而,该设备并不是一个全球性的智能手机,因为个别频段是缺失的。在我们审查期间的随机测试中,信号质量一直很好,但信号强度还没有达到高端智能手机的水平。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
897 (449min - 907max) MBit/s +19%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
843 (813min - 856max) MBit/s +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
825 (790min - 837max) MBit/s +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
756 (667min - 799max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=211, last 2 years)
651 MBit/s -14%
Nokia X30
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
329 (286min - 340max) MBit/s -56%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
977 (487min - 997max) MBit/s +23%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
946 (459min - 973max) MBit/s +19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
797 (643min - 928max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
750 (546min - 831max) MBit/s -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=212, last 2 years)
687 MBit/s -14%
Nokia X30
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
359 (346min - 369max) MBit/s -55%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø756 (667-799)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø797 (643-928)
户外的GPS测试
户外的GPS测试
可用的卫星网络
可用的卫星网络

在户外,定位是快速而精确的,精确度为一米。智能手机使用所有主要的卫星网络进行定位,以及SBAS,使跟踪更加精确。

为了测试智能手机的实际能力,我们去骑自行车,并带着Garmin Venu 2智能手表进行比较。Redmi Note 12 Pro+非常精确地追踪了所走的路线,而且只是不时地出现轻微偏差。因此,如果你正在寻找一个非常适合日常导航的设备,你在这里不会出错。

Garmin Venu 2的本地化 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2的本地化 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2的定位--环路
Garmin Venu 2的定位--环路
Garmin Venu 2的定位 - 桥梁
Garmin Venu 2的定位 - 桥梁
小米Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G的本土化 - 概述
小米Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G的本土化 - 概述
小米Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G的本地化 - 环节
小米Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G的本地化 - 环节
小米Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G的本地化 - 桥梁
小米Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G的本地化 - 桥梁

电话和语音质量 - 无故障通话

小米使用谷歌的默认应用程序进行电话通话。

通过内置听筒的声音质量很好。如果需要,你可以提高音量,使对方的声音相当大,但也会过度。总的来说,我们的对话伙伴听起来有点远,但总是很容易理解。麦克风能很好地捕捉到大声和小声的讲话,并将其清晰地传送给被叫者。

通过扬声器,声音听起来甚至更清晰,更有存在感,但却不那么响亮。麦克风在这里也运作良好,只要不是太大声,智能手机就能过滤掉环境噪音。

相机 - 大量的百万像素和OIS

用前置摄像头拍照
用前置摄像头拍照

Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G的主要焦点是主摄像头:传感器来自三星,具有200MP的巨大分辨率。可以使用全分辨率,也可以使用高分辨率的5000万像素模式。然而,为了获得更高的出光率和产生实用的1250万像素图像,通常会将8个像素结合起来。

由于有了光学图像稳定器,你可以在困难的情况下拍出没有模糊的照片。我们的测试图像显示出良好的清晰度;当你检查非常明亮和非常黑暗的区域时,你才会注意到与高端智能手机相机的区别,更好的光学器件保留了更多的细节。

在低环境光下也是如此,Note 12 Pro+ 5G无法照亮非常黑暗的区域。

视频可以通过主摄像头以4K和30帧的速度录制。也可以进行慢动作视频,速度最慢为32倍,但只有720p。亮度调节时常滞后,但自动对焦通常反应非常快。总的来说,视频的质量很好。

广角相机拍摄的照片还不错,但你不应该把它们放大太多,因为细节会变得模糊。200万像素的微距镜头可以拍摄非常近距离的照片。然而,非常低的分辨率使它们最多只能用于社交媒体或直接在手机屏幕上观看。

广角摄像头和主摄像头之间的混合变焦是可能的。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera - flowerMain camera - surrounding environmentMain camera - low lightWide angle

我们在实验室里仔细观察了主摄像头的成像性能:细节丰富,对比度高,但对边缘的锐利度有一点下降。在1勒克斯的照度下,图表仍然清晰可见,但细节上相当有颗粒感。

ColorChecker
9.2 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
10 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G: 7.4 ∆E min: 1.85 - max: 11.61 ∆E
ColorChecker
27.1 ∆E
40.6 ∆E
31.8 ∆E
30.2 ∆E
33.8 ∆E
41.2 ∆E
39.3 ∆E
26.5 ∆E
28.2 ∆E
26.2 ∆E
41.3 ∆E
43.4 ∆E
24.9 ∆E
34.7 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
42.1 ∆E
28.7 ∆E
30.6 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
40.9 ∆E
39.1 ∆E
32.3 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G: 32.56 ∆E min: 13.38 - max: 43.43 ∆E

配件和保修 - 包括快速充电器

除了120瓦的充电器、一根USB线和一个SIM卡工具外,包装中还包括一个手机的硅胶壳。

小米在欧盟为该智能手机提供2年保修,其中包括电池和电源的保修。这在其他地区可能有所不同,所以买家在购买前应仔细检查。

输入设备和操作 - 小米上的精确指纹传感器

触摸屏每秒刷新240次,所以输入非常精确。由于帧率高达120赫兹,命令的执行非常迅速。

外壳右侧的硬件按钮有一个清晰的压力点。指纹传感器也位于这里,集成在待机按钮上。它能非常可靠地识别存储的指纹,几乎没有等待时间就能解锁智能手机。我们喜欢这样一个事实:小米允许我们选择是否只想把手指放在上面,或者是否真的要按下待机按钮来触发识别。

通过人脸识别解锁也是可能的。这非常方便,在我们的测试中也能顺利工作,但由于是纯软件识别,它不太安全。

纵向模式下的键盘
纵向模式下的键盘
横向模式下的键盘
横向模式下的键盘

显示屏 - 明亮,色彩准确,但遗憾的是有PWM功能

子像素网格
子像素网格

6.67英寸的OLED屏幕与小米Redmi Note 12 Pro的所有规格相同,在我们用CalMAN软件和分光光度计进行的测试中也取得了非常相似的结果:平均亮度为939cd/m²,然而,在小的照明区域几乎没有任何进一步增加。尽管如此,这个亮度对于HDR内容来说是足够的。

我们还测量了121赫兹的PWM闪烁,因此该显示器可能会给敏感用户带来问题。因此,我们强烈建议在购买之前在低亮度下试用该屏幕。

917
cd/m²
928
cd/m²
959
cd/m²
923
cd/m²
942
cd/m²
968
cd/m²
914
cd/m²
940
cd/m²
960
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 968 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 939 cd/m² Minimum: 1.8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 942 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.05 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
104.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.263
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.40
Nokia X30
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.43
Google Pixel 6a
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.10
Screen
12%
-38%
-134%
-9%
Brightness middle
942
938
0%
940
0%
693
-26%
758
-20%
Brightness
939
939
0%
935
0%
709
-24%
767
-18%
Brightness Distribution
94
96
2%
99
5%
83
-12%
93
-1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.05
0.9
14%
2.4
-129%
4.78
-355%
0.9
14%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.65
1.6
40%
3.2
-21%
7.54
-185%
2.5
6%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.2
1
17%
2.2
-83%
3.6
-200%
1.6
-33%
Gamma
2.263 97%
2.25 98%
2.05 107%
2.228 99%
2.2 100%
CCT
6477 100%
6350 102%
6422 101%
7327 89%
6599 98%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 121 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 121 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 121 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最低的亮度水平
最低的亮度水平
25%的亮度
25%的亮度
50%的亮度
50%的亮度
75%的亮度
75%的亮度
100%的亮度
100%的亮度

在固定的变焦水平和不同的亮度设置下进行的一系列测量

在更精确的色彩再现测量中,OLED显示屏的表现非常好,没有显示任何重大的异常值。在正确的色彩设置 "标准 "下,该屏幕也可用于自然色彩评估。

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN颜色精度
卡尔曼sRGB色彩空间
卡尔曼sRGB色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB色彩空间
CalMAN DCI P3色彩空间
CalMAN DCI P3色彩空间
卡尔曼饱和度
卡尔曼饱和度

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5 ms rise
↘ 0.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5 ms rise
↘ 0.5 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

显示屏在户外有足够的亮度,即使是在阳光非常充足的环境中。从侧面看屏幕没有任何问题,因为图像始终保持清晰可见。

户外使用
户外使用
视角稳定
视角稳定

性能 - 在其价格范围内不是最快的

与稍微便宜的Redmi Note 12 Pro,Pro+在性能方面没有带来任何好处。毕竟,它运行在相同的SoC上,其形式为 联发科Dimensity 1080这是一个中端芯片,有两个快速核心,时钟速度高达2.6GHz。对于要求不高的任务,有六个更经济的核心,频率为2GHz。

在日常使用中,Redmi Note 12 Pro+通常管理得足够好,而且该SoC还可以处理要求更高的应用程序。该设备只有在多任务处理和同时运行众多高要求的应用程序时才达到极限。

在这个价格范围内,还有更慢的智能手机,如诺基亚X30.然而,A54 Galaxy A54谷歌的Pixel 6a以类似的价格提供更多的性能。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
1025 Points +35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=220, last 2 years)
911 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
783 Points +3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  (761 - 782, n=3)
769 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
765 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
761 Points
Nokia X30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
669 Points -12%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=220, last 2 years)
2988 Points +46%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
2940 Points +44%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
2817 Points +38%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  (2035 - 2315, n=3)
2130 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
2041 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
2035 Points 0%
Nokia X30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1918 Points -6%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=153, last 2 years)
738503 Points +61%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
715338 Points +56%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
507481 Points +11%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  (458379 - 472321, n=2)
465350 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
458379 Points
Nokia X30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
403289 Points -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
Points -100%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
13024 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
12564 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  (11721 - 12564, n=3)
12016 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=215, last 2 years)
11771 Points -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
11763 Points -6%
Nokia X30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
9875 Points -21%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
9717 Points -23%
CrossMark - Overall
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
865 Points +29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (200 - 1474, n=165, last 2 years)
837 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
703 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
672 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
665 Points -1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  (657 - 672, n=3)
665 Points -1%
Nokia X30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
580 Points -14%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
5950 Points +40%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)
5759 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
4666 Points +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
4247 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
4189 Points -1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  (3850 - 4247, n=3)
4095 Points -4%
Nokia X30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3589 Points -15%
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)
9672 Points +25%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
9109 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
8961 Points +15%
Nokia X30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
8072 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
7761 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  (6684 - 7761, n=3)
7209 Points -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
6684 Points -14%
Memory
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
6592 Points +18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)
6267 Points +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
5938 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
5607 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  (5267 - 5938, n=3)
5604 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
4857 Points -13%
Nokia X30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4351 Points -22%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)
14220 Points +188%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
14148 Points +186%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
7108 Points +44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
5093 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
4941 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  (4666 - 5093, n=3)
4900 Points -1%
Nokia X30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4379 Points -11%
Web
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
1533 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
1521 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
1513 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)
1495 Points -1%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
1476 Points -2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  (1244 - 1521, n=3)
1426 Points -6%
Nokia X30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1078 Points -29%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
22589 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  (21997 - 22589, n=3)
22359 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
21997 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (207 - 84787, n=150, last 2 years)
21814 Points -3%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
21639 Points -4%
Nokia X30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
6903 Points -69%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
5835 Points -74%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 245629, n=105, last 2 years)
17833 Points +101%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  (8784 - 9429, n=3)
9033 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
8887 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
8784 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
622 Points -93%
Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 2930, n=105, last 2 years)
1390 Points +46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
954 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  ()
954 Points 0%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 7408, n=105, last 2 years)
3840 Points +72%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
2229 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  ()
2229 Points 0%
GPU OpenCL
Average of class Smartphone
  (157 - 16987, n=56, last 2 years)
7700 Points +222%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
2394 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  ()
2394 Points 0%
GPU Vulkan
Average of class Smartphone
  (152 - 16867, n=60, last 2 years)
7862 Points +231%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
2375 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  ()
2375 Points 0%

特别是图形单元的性能表明,在这个价格范围内有更快的替代品。尽管如此,这款智能手机应该仍然能够在原生屏幕分辨率下处理大多数应用程序。在GFXBench中,1440p或4K的帧率只下降到30帧以下。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1626 Points +163%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
799 Points +29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
632 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
619 Points
Nokia X30
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
353 Points -43%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2040 Points +222%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
813 Points +28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
643 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
633 Points
Nokia X30
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
358 Points -43%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7261 Points +223%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2853 Points +27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2287 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2247 Points
Nokia X30
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1201 Points -47%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6695 Points +195%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2826 Points +24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2273 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2270 Points
Nokia X30
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1206 Points -47%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
94 fps +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
86 fps
Nokia X30
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
78 fps -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
64 fps -26%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -30%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
252 fps +145%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
119 fps +16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
106 fps +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
103 fps
Nokia X30
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
95 fps -8%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
69 fps +19%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
58 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
58 fps 0%
Nokia X30
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
42 fps -28%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
151 fps +129%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
80 fps +21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
69 fps +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
66 fps
Nokia X30
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
48 fps -27%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps +62%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps +27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
37 fps
Nokia X30
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps -22%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
100 fps +133%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
52 fps +21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
46 fps +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
43 fps
Nokia X30
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps -21%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps +157%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps +24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps
Nokia X30
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -19%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
31 fps +19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
27 fps +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps
Nokia X30
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps -23%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps +144%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps +25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps -12%
Nokia X30
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps -25%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28 fps +155%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps +18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps
Nokia X30
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.2 fps -25%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps +72%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps +20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
27 fps +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps
Nokia X30
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps -24%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps +17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps 0%
Nokia X30
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps -21%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14 fps +241%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.9 fps +44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4.7 fps +15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4.1 fps
Nokia X30
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.6 fps -12%

红米手机的网页浏览速度相当快。在较大的网站上,滚动通常很流畅,而且图片通常已经预装。只有在打开网页时,才会不时出现短暂的等待时间。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)
106.1 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
94.611 Points +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 114)
84.748 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080 (69.7 - 84.7, n=3)
75.4 Points -11%
Google Pixel 6a (Firefox 1ß4-2-ß)
75.261 Points -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Chrome 111)
71.873 Points -15%
Nokia X30 (Chrome 106.0.5249.118)
60.684 Points -28%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)
107.1 runs/min +45%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)
90.4 runs/min +23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G (Chome 114)
73.7 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
70.5 runs/min -4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080 (62.2 - 73.7, n=3)
66.3 runs/min -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Chrome 111)
62.9 runs/min -15%
Nokia X30 (Chrome 106.0.5249.118)
47.7 runs/min -35%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=160, last 2 years)
100.2 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
97 Points +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 114)
87 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080 (71 - 87, n=3)
77.3 Points -11%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)
72 Points -17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Chrome 111)
71 Points -18%
Nokia X30 (Chrome 106.0.5249.118)
59 Points -32%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)
133.1 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
124 Points +25%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080 (99 - 114, n=3)
105 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Chrome 111)
102 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 114)
99 Points
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)
77 Points -22%
Nokia X30 (Chrome 106.0.5249.118)
76 Points -23%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
33801 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=214, last 2 years)
33357 Points +5%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)
33046 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 114)
31839 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Chrome 111)
31662 Points -1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080 (25154 - 31839, n=3)
29552 Points -7%
Nokia X30 (Chrome 106.0.5249.118)
21723 Points -32%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Nokia X30 (Chrome 106.0.5249.118)
1913.1 ms * -10%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080 (1747 - 1797, n=3)
1770 ms * -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Chrome 111)
1766.4 ms * -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 114)
1746.5 ms *
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)
1595 ms * +9%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)
1531.6 ms * +12%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
1208.8 ms * +31%

* ... smaller is better

凭借其UFS 2.2存储,Redmi Note 12 Pro+在速度方面是一流的标准。存储控制器也从闪存设备中获得了很多东西,通过与Galaxy A54Nokia X30 的直接比较就可以看出。

因此,你可以期待更短的加载时间和快速的数据传输。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5GSamsung Galaxy A54 5GNokia X30Google Pixel 6aAverage 256 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-3%
-47%
-39%
-2%
-13%
22%
Sequential Read 256KB
977.8
1008.8
3%
528.32
-46%
499.88
-49%
1312.64
34%
Sequential Write 256KB
912.5
865.59
-5%
335.39
-63%
467.96
-49%
712.94
-22%
690 ?(369 - 913, n=22)
-24%
Random Read 4KB
250.9
241.83
-4%
236.23
-6%
189.83
-24%
219.53
-13%
Random Write 4KB
243.3
234.21
-4%
70.52
-71%
162.59
-33%
225.61
-7%

游戏 - 高达100 fps

如果需要,Redmi Note 12 Pro+能够在动作游戏中创造出100-120帧的平滑画面,例如团队射击游戏Armajet。

然而,在大多数要求更高的游戏中,你必须满足于更低的帧数。例如,在《暗黑破坏神不朽》中只能选择30 fps。帧率是用GameBench软件套件进行测量。

通过触摸屏进行控制没有问题,位置传感器在相应的游戏中也能可靠地完成其工作。

暗黑破坏神:不朽
暗黑破坏神:不朽
PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
氩氦刀
氩氦刀
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø116.4 (99-121)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 2.6.0: Ø59.2 (55-61)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.6.0: Ø39.7 (38-41)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G; Diablo Immortal; Medium Mobile Low; 1.8.4: Ø30 (29-31)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G; Diablo Immortal; Ultra Mobile Very High; 1.8.4: Ø29.7 (23-31)

排放 - 变热但不节流

温度

在高达46.5℃的温度下,当长时间在高负荷下运行时,手机会明显发热。

不过,这对SoC的性能几乎没有任何影响:在3DMark Wild Life Extreme的20次重复测试后,性能只下降了1.6%。

Max. Load
 45.4 °C41.2 °C37.9 °C 
 46.5 °C41.1 °C38.3 °C 
 46.4 °C41.5 °C38.6 °C 
Maximum: 46.5 °C
Average: 41.9 °C
36.8 °C40 °C43.1 °C
37.5 °C40.1 °C44.2 °C
35.9 °C40.1 °C44.3 °C
Maximum: 44.3 °C
Average: 40.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  40.5 °C | Room Temperature 20.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.9 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.5 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Nokia X30
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.7 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 %
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.8 % -1%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42.9 % -57%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % +1%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % +1%
Nokia X30
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.4 %
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49.2 % -50%
0510152025303540Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø3.79 (3.74-3.8)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø3.79 (3.79-3.8)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø4.85 (4.84-4.87)
Nokia X30 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø2.16 (2.15-2.17)
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø7.52 (6.17-12.6)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.7 (13.6-13.7)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.7 (13.6-13.7)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø16.9 (16.8-17)
Nokia X30 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.22 (7.21-7.23)
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø23.7 (17.4-40.5)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø17 (17-17.1)
热成像-背面
热成像-背面
热成像 - 正面
热成像 - 正面

发言人

红米智能手机的立体声扬声器的最大音量只能达到81.1分贝(A)的平庸水平。反过来说,它们听起来相当清晰,只有在人声很高的情况下,高音才会有一点铿锵。总的来说,这些扬声器可以用来享受日常音乐。

当然,外部音响系统或耳机的声音更好。这些可以通过3.5毫米插孔或蓝牙5.2连接。众多的音频编解码器可用于无线音频传输,包括aptX TWS+、AAC或LHDC v3/v4。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.243.82537.5423130.635.44034.535.85037.137.16330.930.28017.219.510020.221.112518.827.816017.236.520012.141.925013.349.131512.652.940010.155.150010.561.163010.566.580012.969100011.672125015.473160011.471.920001170.3250011.370.131501270.5400012.966.1500013.467.1630014.163.6800014.959.61000015.765.61250016.558.61600017.355.5SPL25.381.1N0.648.1median 12.9median 63.6Delta2.5104342.930.440.723.223.623.325.136.433.124.12520.325.717.628.115.742.713.854.516.255.915.156.812.658.513.161.113.168.412.772.114.775.813.475.412.873.912.874.312.874.713.276.913.77613.980.513.177.313.971.213.366.61469.714.26813.65525.687.40.770.9median 13.6median 70.90.98.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5GGoogle Pixel 6a
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Google Pixel 6a audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 持续时间长,充电快

消耗功率

虽然我们测得Redmi Note 12 Pro+在设备打开但不处于负载状态时的消耗量相当高,为1.1瓦,但在其他情况下这是该级别的典型情况。 三星的Galaxy A54谷歌的Pixel 6a在满负荷状态下需要更多的电力,但它们也能提供更多的计算能力。

红米手机可以用高达120瓦的功率进行充电。因此,电池最迟在30分钟内又完全充满。即使你只能把智能手机放在充电器上几分钟,你也能得到足够的电量,可以使用几个小时。然而,无线充电并不适用于我们的评测样本。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.1 / 1.4 / 1.9 Watt
Load midlight 4.2 / 7 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
5000 mAh
Nokia X30
4200 mAh
Google Pixel 6a
4410 mAh
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-5%
-1%
6%
-2%
2%
-5%
Idle Minimum *
1.1
0.99
10%
0.75
32%
0.8
27%
0.68
38%
0.927 ?(0.69 - 1.1, n=3)
16%
Idle Average *
1.4
2.03
-45%
1.51
-8%
1.5
-7%
1.56
-11%
1.68 ?(1.4 - 2.03, n=3)
-20%
Idle Maximum *
1.9
2.08
-9%
1.62
15%
1.8
5%
1.58
17%
Load Average *
4.2
3.97
5%
4.91
-17%
4.3
-2%
5.37
-28%
Load Maximum *
7
5.85
16%
8.93
-28%
6.5
7%
8.74
-25%
6.45 ?(5.85 - 7, n=3)
8%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.74 (1.186-6.95)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.691 (1.421-2.16)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.50.70.91.21.41.71.92.12.42.62.83.13.33.53.844.34.5Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.06 (3.91-4.73)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.691 (1.421-2.16)

电池寿命

Redmi Note 12 Pro Plus 5G的5000毫安时电池在非常低的负载下可以持续26:42小时,这比一些竞争对手明显短。另一方面,在日常生活中,平均负荷更重要,比如上网时,在这里,我们的测试设备在15:52小时的水平上,属于同类产品。

在满负荷的情况下,你可以享受到长达4:34小时的乐趣。因此,游戏玩家在智能手机必须插电之前有几个小时的时间。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
26h 42min
WiFi Websurfing
15h 52min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 43min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 34min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
5000 mAh
Nokia X30
4200 mAh
Google Pixel 6a
4410 mAh
Battery Runtime
4%
29%
19%
15%
Reader / Idle
1602
1598
0%
2591
62%
2467
54%
1878
17%
H.264
1003
1043
4%
1508
50%
1229
23%
1318
31%
WiFi v1.3
952
978
3%
941
-1%
860
-10%
768
-19%
Load
274
299
9%
284
4%
302
10%
360
31%

Pros

+ 大量的存储空间
+ 良好的相机与OIS
+ 明亮的OLED显示屏,色彩还原准确
+ 可以以120帧的速度进行游戏(取决于游戏)。
+ 负载下没有节流现象
+ 广泛的蓝牙编解码器
+ 运行时间长
+ 加载速度非常快
+ 准确的跟踪能力

Cons

- PWM闪动
- 负载下有明显的废热
- 没有无线充电
- 操作系统中有广告
- 不防水
- 沉重

结论 -Redmi Note 12 Pro+是一款坚实的智能手机

在审查中:小米Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G。测试设备由:
在审查中:小米Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G。测试设备由:
cyberport.de

小米最昂贵的智能手机Redmi Note 12系列是一个有用的补充:顶级型号提供无与伦比的快速加载时间和双倍的数据存储。 Note 12 Pro.2亿像素的摄像头提供了一些不错的噱头,但在质量和灵活性方面无法真正超越其更便宜的姐妹机型的摄像头。

你可以用不到500美元的价格买到更强大的智能手机,但Note 12 Pro+在大多数情况下为日常使用提供了足够的动力,并配有快速存储。

批评的一点是,这款智能手机的重量相对较高。另外,令人讨厌的是,它配备了Android 12,并且在系统中有一些广告应用程序,甚至是弹出式广告。至少,这款智能手机预计将在4年内获得安全更新。

精确的定位,明亮的真彩OLED屏幕,以及可靠的指纹传感器,也是对该智能手机有利的说法。

小米Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G是一款中档智能手机,充电速度快,跟踪可靠,性能适合日常使用。高分辨率相机提供了良好的图像质量,但并不特别。

红米手机的替代品包括 三星Galaxy A54具有更强的功率和eSIM支持。你现在可以在亚马逊网站上以399.99美元(-11%)的价格买到它。它是防水的,但内存较少,充电技术也慢得多。

这款手机 谷歌Pixel 6a也可以在亚马逊网站上以297.99美元(-15%)的价格买到,其后续产品刚刚发布。这款智能手机的功率很大,也有一个防水外壳。然而,用户不得不使用60赫兹的屏幕。

价格和可用性

美国亚马逊正在上市小米Redmi Note 12 Pro+,售价365.00美元。而印度亚马逊则以29596美元的价格提供该机型。

价格截止到2023年6月17日,可能会有变化。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G - 06/15/2023 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
84%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
55 / 70 → 79%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
94%
Games Performance
47 / 64 → 73%
Application Performance
77 / 86 → 90%
Temperature
86%
Noise
100%
Audio
77 / 90 → 86%
Camera
70%
Average
79%
85%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 小米Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G智能手机评论:中端产品中的2亿像素摄像头
Florian Schmitt, 2023-06-17 (Update: 2023-06-17)