Notebookcheck Logo

realme C35智能手机评测--200欧元以下的强大功能

给我更多。 全高清屏幕和UFS存储通常安装在昂贵的手机中。然而,realme将这些功能装进了一部智能手机,只需180欧元(约190美元)就能买到。此外,这款手机有一个大电池,而且相当轻。那么,realme C35是否值得全面推荐?
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android ARM Smartphone
realme C35
realme C35 (C Series)
Processor
UNISOC T616 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G57 MP1
Memory
4096 MB 
Display
6.60 inch 20:9, 2408 x 1080 pixel 400 PPI, 180 Hz sampling rate, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 64 GB 
, 46 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1TB, dedicated, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration, gyroscope, proximity
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41) , Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.1 x 164.4 x 75.6
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 18 Watt charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.8, phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/​30fps (Camera 1); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, macro lens (Camera 2); 2.0MP, f/​2.8, depth of field (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/​2.0, Videos @720p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, Keyboard: virtual keyboard, charger, cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.841 W/kg (head), 1.141 W/kg (body), fanless
Weight
189 g
Price
179 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
77.6 %
05/2022
realme C35
T616, Mali-G57 MP1
189 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2408x1080
74.9 %
12/2021
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1
205 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
73.8 %
02/2022
Xiaomi Redmi 9C
Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320
196 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.53"1600x720
78.5 %
03/2022
Nokia G21
T606, Mali-G57 MP1
190 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720

外壳和功能 - 有棱有角的设计

realme C25Y它的微型USB端口和阴暗的屏幕仍然看起来有点老式,而新一代的realme C35已经让人感觉更先进了。C35有两种配置。

  • realme C35 64 GB大容量存储/4GB内存:179欧元(约189美元)。
  • realme C35 128 GB大容量存储/4GB RAM:199欧元(约210美元)。

realme为其低价智能手机提供了两种颜色的变体。发光的绿色和发光的黑色,都有一个反光的背面和一个从主摄像头发出的漂亮的光折射效果。设计相当有棱角,我们很喜欢,同时智能手机拿在手里也不会有不舒服的感觉。外壳完全由塑料制成。

在稳定性方面,我们相当喜欢realme C35。它几乎不能被扭曲,你必须施加强大的压力,直到液晶上出现明显的斑点。同时,这款手机比较轻,总重量为189克(约6.7盎司)。

NFC的缺失让人有点恼火。这在这个价格范围内并非完全不寻常,但像移动支付这样的应用是不可能的。micro-SD读卡器是独立的,所以它可以同时使用两张SIM卡。在CPDT基准测试中,它的速度相当快,但在复制测试中只达到了同类水平。

realme C35
realme C35
realme C35
realme C35
realme C35

尺寸比较

164.9 mm 77 mm 9 mm 196 g164.6 mm 75.9 mm 8.5 mm 190 g164 mm 75.8 mm 8.9 mm 205 g164.4 mm 75.6 mm 8.1 mm 189 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
  (Angelbird V60)
47.8 MB/s ∼100% +133%
Average of class Smartphone
  (11.8 - 55.3, n=77, last 2 years)
25.7 MB/s ∼54% +25%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C
  (Angelbird V60)
21.15 MB/s ∼44% +3%
Nokia G21
  (Angelbird V60)
20.6 MB/s ∼43% 0%
realme C35
  (Angelbird V60)
20.5 MB/s ∼43%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird V60: Ø37.9 (18.7-45.1)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird V60: Ø32.3 (23.2-38.8)
Xiaomi Redmi 9C PowerVR GE8320, Helio G35, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird V60: Ø37 (26-47.6)
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird V60: Ø30.5 (12.9-38.6)
realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird V60: Ø78.4 (34.6-83.9)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird V60: Ø50.2 (31.6-54.4)
Xiaomi Redmi 9C PowerVR GE8320, Helio G35, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird V60: Ø73.4 (15.2-76.3)
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird V60: Ø75.5 (39.6-81.6)

通信、软件和操作 - realme手机中的快速WLAN

由于支持Wi-Fi 5,realme C35在我们与参考路由器华硕GT-AXE11000进行的Wi-Fi测试中可以令人信服:它很好地使用了该技术,速率在300至350Mbps之间,总体上也相当稳定。

在无线网络方面,我们不得不使用LTE;5G是不存在的。此外,只有少数频率可用。我们评测样本的LTE支持对中欧来说是足够的,但在远行之前,你应该检查你是否能在目的地国家使用移动互联网。在手机接收的样本测试中,这款智能手机并没有被证明是高端智能手机的水平,但它至少可以提供一半的信号强度,甚至在大多数时间里在室内。

realme UI被预装为软件界面;它是基于Android 11。安全更新是在测试时从2022年4月开始的,所以它们是非常最新的。这是非常令人高兴的,特别是对于这样一款廉价的智能手机。你必须忍受一些以广告为目的的第三方应用程序,但它们可以毫无问题地被卸载。

指纹传感器位于外壳的右侧。用右手的拇指和左手的食指可以很容易地接触到它。你必须忍受解锁时的短暂延迟,但手指识别的准确性非常好。通过前置摄像头进行的面部识别也可用于解锁。

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Xiaomi Redmi 9C
802.11 b/g/n
47.7 (14min - 69max) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
802.11 b/g/n
42.9 (21min - 65max) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
802.11 b/g/n
50.4 (41min - 57max) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C
802.11 b/g/n
35.8 (19min - 52max) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000
realme C35
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
347 (309min - 366max) MBit/s ∼100%
Nokia G21
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
339 (328min - 362max) MBit/s ∼98% -2%
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000
Nokia G21
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
299 (224min - 315max) MBit/s ∼100% +23%
realme C35
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
244 (179min - 255max) MBit/s ∼82%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø244 (179-255)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø347 (309-366)

照相机--希望成为上层社会的一员

凭借其5000万像素的摄像头,realme C35似乎可以与更昂贵的 realme GT 2 Pro.然而,我们的测试设备有一个没有图像稳定功能的三星图像传感器,而且像素相当小。至少它还使用了像素分档,所以用户可以选择是以5000万像素的质量拍摄,还是以1200万像素的质量和更高的光敏度拍摄。

图像质量很快显示,传感器无法跟上高质量的智能手机相机。颜色有时看起来很平淡,细节也会丢失。在周围环境中,天空看起来明显有颗粒感。在低光照和高对比度的情况下,黑暗区域几乎看不到细节,图像清晰度只有中等水平。realme C35的照片很好,但对于其价格范围来说是平均水平。

用主摄像头进行视频录制可以达到全高清和30帧/秒。自动对焦和亮度调节工作得相当好,整体图片质量令人满意。一个低分辨率的微距摄像头可用于特写,第三个摄像头仅用于支持,不拍摄自己的照片。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera PlantMain camera EnvironmentMain camera Low Light
click to load images
ColorChecker
21.3 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
21.6 ∆E
24.2 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
12 ∆E
21.4 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
ColorChecker realme C35: 13.68 ∆E min: 2.47 - max: 24.22 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.8 ∆E
48.6 ∆E
35.8 ∆E
36.8 ∆E
39.2 ∆E
56.6 ∆E
50.5 ∆E
30.8 ∆E
36 ∆E
25 ∆E
57.3 ∆E
59.9 ∆E
26.9 ∆E
47.2 ∆E
32.9 ∆E
64.8 ∆E
36.7 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
63.4 ∆E
63.9 ∆E
48.3 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
24 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
ColorChecker realme C35: 41.94 ∆E min: 14.08 - max: 64.82 ∆E

显示屏 - 高分辨率realme屏幕

子像素记录
子像素记录

realme C35的显示屏非常明亮,亮度高达582cd/m²,并且在其价格范围内具有较高的分辨率,具有扩展的全高清分辨率。然而,色彩再现只是适度准确,这并不因设置中可选择的不同模式而改变。

此外,这款智能手机的黑值相当高,为0.6cd/m²,因此只能达到一般的对比度。该显示屏不使用PWM。总的来说,realme C35的屏幕具有高分辨率和高亮度,与同价位的其他手机屏幕相比有两个重量级的优势。

582
cd/m²
562
cd/m²
518
cd/m²
571
cd/m²
585
cd/m²
532
cd/m²
555
cd/m²
579
cd/m²
541
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 585 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 558.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 585 cd/m²
Contrast: 975:1 (Black: 0.6 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.4 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 5.9 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
96% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.228
realme C35
IPS, 2408x1080, 6.60
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
IPS LCD, 1600x720, 6.50
Xiaomi Redmi 9C
IPS, 1600x720, 6.53
Nokia G21
IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
Response Times
-29%
-31%
-35%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
50 ?(29, 21)
58 ?(31, 27)
-16%
60 ?(27, 33)
-20%
64 ?(31, 33)
-28%
Response Time Black / White *
24 ?(9, 13)
34 ?(17, 17)
-42%
34 ?(17, 17)
-42%
34 ?(17, 17)
-42%
PWM Frequency
178.6 ?(7)
17120
Screen
8%
-5%
-8%
Brightness middle
585
446
-24%
467
-20%
492
-16%
Brightness
558
423
-24%
417
-25%
484
-13%
Brightness Distribution
89
88
-1%
83
-7%
86
-3%
Black Level *
0.6
0.29
52%
0.53
12%
0.46
23%
Contrast
975
1538
58%
881
-10%
1070
10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.4
4.94
-12%
4.14
6%
6.02
-37%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.77
8.81
-0%
8.49
3%
9.13
-4%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.9
5.1
14%
6
-2%
7.1
-20%
Gamma
2.228 99%
2.145 103%
2.291 96%
2.345 94%
CCT
8001 81%
7890 82%
7536 86%
8918 73%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-11% / 1%
-18% / -11%
-22% / -13%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (23.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
50 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 29 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (37 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21940 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN色彩空间
CalMAN色彩空间
CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN饱和度

性能、排放和电池寿命 - 良好的性能,良好的运行时间

笔记本电脑 Unisoc T616SoC在realme C35的价格段中提供了良好的性能率。然而,这并不意味着你应该期待完全流畅的滚动或在网站上超快的加载图片。realme手机仍然是一个相当便宜的智能手机,你不应该期待上层的性能。

至少realme安装了非常快的UFS 2.2存储,这很容易超过其他价格范围内的手机,并有助于在某种程度上获得更流畅的体验和更快的复杂应用程序的加载时间。

外壳上的升温仍在限制范围内,最高温度为40.9℃(106°F)。

底部边缘的小扬声器即使在最大音量下也不会过载,在最大音量为85.5 dB(A)时,足以让一个中等大小的房间充满声音。同时,声音是非常重的高音,因此听起来相当薄。

如果你想正确地享受音乐或电影的声音,你应该连接扬声器或耳机,这可以通过3.5毫米插孔或蓝牙5.0实现。支持aptX HD,但最新的编解码器如aptX低延迟或aptX自适应则不支持。

realme C35的电池寿命几乎达到16小时,在同类产品中和一般情况下绝对令人信服。因此,即使是密集使用的两个工作日也不应该是一个问题。此外,这款手机通过附带的充电器以高达18瓦的功率充电,因此在不到2小时内就能再次充满电。

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
298 Points ∼46%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
178 Points ∼27% -40%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
149 Points ∼23% -50%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
312 Points ∼48% +5%
Average UNISOC T616
  (298 - 380, n=2)
339 Points ∼52% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=260, last 2 years)
650 Points ∼100% +118%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1184 Points ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1087 Points ∼51% -8%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
538 Points ∼25% -55%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1185 Points ∼55% 0%
Average UNISOC T616
  (1184 - 1392, n=2)
1288 Points ∼60% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=260, last 2 years)
2144 Points ∼100% +81%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
8066 Points ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
5739 Points ∼57% -29%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
5208 Points ∼51% -35%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
7805 Points ∼77% -3%
Average UNISOC T616
 
8066 Points ∼79% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 18567, n=129, last 2 years)
10147 Points ∼100% +26%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1710 Points ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1273 Points ∼26% -26%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
843 Points ∼18% -51%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1414 Points ∼29% -17%
Average UNISOC T616
 
1710 Points ∼36% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 13121, n=241, last 2 years)
4806 Points ∼100% +181%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1518 Points ∼23%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1142 Points ∼17% -25%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
799 Points ∼12% -47%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1255 Points ∼19% -17%
Average UNISOC T616
 
1518 Points ∼23% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 31940, n=241, last 2 years)
6602 Points ∼100% +335%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
3063 Points ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
2032 Points ∼63% -34%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1043 Points ∼33% -66%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
2546 Points ∼80% -17%
Average UNISOC T616
 
3063 Points ∼96% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (651 - 6394, n=239, last 2 years)
3202 Points ∼100% +5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1103 Points ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
863 Points ∼34% -22%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
445 Points ∼17% -60%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
945 Points ∼37% -14%
Average UNISOC T616
 
1103 Points ∼43% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=194, last 2 years)
2564 Points ∼100% +132%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
935 Points ∼35%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
738 Points ∼28% -21%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
377 Points ∼14% -60%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
806 Points ∼30% -14%
Average UNISOC T616
 
935 Points ∼35% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=194, last 2 years)
2674 Points ∼100% +186%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
2959 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
2031 Points ∼69% -31%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1194 Points ∼40% -60%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
2379 Points ∼80% -20%
Average UNISOC T616
 
2959 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (688 - 5318, n=194, last 2 years)
2859 Points ∼97% -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1109 Points ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
867 Points ∼22% -22%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
491 Points ∼12% -56%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
959 Points ∼24% -14%
Average UNISOC T616
 
1109 Points ∼28% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 11528, n=244, last 2 years)
3936 Points ∼100% +255%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
939 Points ∼19%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
736 Points ∼15% -22%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
425 Points ∼9% -55%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
814 Points ∼17% -13%
Average UNISOC T616
 
939 Points ∼19% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 19364, n=244, last 2 years)
4838 Points ∼100% +415%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
3036 Points ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
2109 Points ∼66% -31%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1073 Points ∼33% -65%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
2559 Points ∼80% -16%
Average UNISOC T616
 
3036 Points ∼95% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (635 - 5793, n=244, last 2 years)
3212 Points ∼100% +6%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
463 Points ∼14%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
428 Points ∼13% -8%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
397 Points ∼12% -14%
Average UNISOC T616
 
463 Points ∼14% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (216 - 10062, n=169, last 2 years)
3275 Points ∼100% +607%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
464 Points ∼14%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
426 Points ∼13% -8%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
393 Points ∼12% -15%
Average UNISOC T616
 
464 Points ∼14% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (174 - 11700, n=167, last 2 years)
3364 Points ∼100% +625%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
129 Points ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
116 Points ∼12% -10%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
111 Points ∼11% -14%
Average UNISOC T616
 
129 Points ∼13% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102 - 3080, n=121, last 2 years)
1001 Points ∼100% +676%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
126 Points ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
117 Points ∼12% -7%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
110 Points ∼11% -13%
Average UNISOC T616
 
126 Points ∼13% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (101 - 2864, n=118, last 2 years)
978 Points ∼100% +676%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
5.4 fps ∼19%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
11 fps ∼40% +104%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
7.5 fps ∼27% +39%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
9.5 fps ∼34% +76%
Average UNISOC T616
 
5.4 fps ∼19% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 98, n=257, last 2 years)
27.8 fps ∼100% +415%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
6.1 fps ∼18%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
6.2 fps ∼19% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
4.1 fps ∼12% -33%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
5.2 fps ∼16% -15%
Average UNISOC T616
 
6.1 fps ∼18% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2 - 257, n=258, last 2 years)
33.2 fps ∼100% +444%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
3.4 fps ∼18%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
7 fps ∼37% +106%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
4.8 fps ∼25% +41%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
6 fps ∼31% +76%
Average UNISOC T616
 
3.4 fps ∼18% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.1 - 69, n=258, last 2 years)
19.1 fps ∼100% +462%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
2.2 fps ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
2.2 fps ∼17% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1.5 fps ∼12% -32%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
2 fps ∼16% -9%
Average UNISOC T616
 
2.2 fps ∼17% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.7 - 101, n=258, last 2 years)
12.8 fps ∼100% +482%
realme C35Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127FXiaomi Redmi 9CNokia G21Average 64 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-65%
-59%
-56%
0%
11%
Sequential Read 256KB
907.1
302.3
-67%
263.1
-71%
257.6
-72%
907
0%
892 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=257, last 2 years)
-2%
Sequential Write 256KB
271.1
74.5
-73%
208.4
-23%
180.6
-33%
271
0%
431 ?(11.9 - 1465, n=257, last 2 years)
59%
Random Read 4KB
137.8
77.8
-44%
54.5
-60%
74
-46%
137.8
0%
158.5 ?(13.5 - 325, n=257, last 2 years)
15%
Random Write 4KB
206.4
47.21
-77%
39.7
-81%
60.2
-71%
206
0%
151.2 ?(5.5 - 449, n=257, last 2 years)
-27%

温度

Max. Load
 40.9 °C37.4 °C37.2 °C 
 40.1 °C37.6 °C36.8 °C 
 39.7 °C37.5 °C37.3 °C 
Maximum: 40.9 °C
Average: 38.3 °C
33.5 °C36.2 °C39.8 °C
34.4 °C36.1 °C40.1 °C
34.4 °C37.1 °C39.8 °C
Maximum: 40.1 °C
Average: 36.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  39.9 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.3 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.


热力图前线
热力图前线
热图背面
热图背面

演讲者

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2048.639.72547.638.43139.736.44031.534.65035.2306345.4378040.533.610038.930.412537.230.616030.335.520023.139.125021.643.931520.84640024.152.250021.455.763021.8628002367.6100022.870.1125023.469.6160019.568.6200019.668.4250017.369.8315016.872.6400014.780.2500012.179.4630014.271.9800012.767.41000010.568.51250010.563.41600010.348.7SPL32.785.5N1.856.3median 20.8median 67.4Delta3.410.849.350.843.943.837.135.137.940.743.84531.833.92829.927.933.123.535.423.838.819.640.61943.117.549.215.252.716.8602168.222.376.518.781.417.376.115.870.415.868.117.470.418.472.220.270.420.369.420.173.121.471.721.871.521.365.821.855.631.685.61.661.2median 20.1median 68.21.810.7hearing rangehide median Pink Noiserealme C35Nokia G21
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
realme C35 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Nokia G21 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命

realme C35
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 9C
5000 mAh
Nokia G21
5050 mAh
Average of class Smartphone
 
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
958
879
-8%
905
-6%
1087
13%
904 ?(438 - 1953, n=265, last 2 years)
-6%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
15h 58min

Pros

+ 明亮的全高清屏幕
+ 运行时间长
+ 低重量
+ 快如闪电的内存
+ 快速的WiFi 5

Cons

- 易受指纹影响
- 没有NFC
- 少数LTE频率

结论 - 一个好的提议,但不适合所有人

回顾:realme C35。测试设备由德国realme提供。
回顾:realme C35。测试设备由德国realme提供。

realme C35是其他200欧元(约211美元)以下廉价智能手机的良好替代品。这主要是由于良好的电池寿命与足够快的充电技术相搭配,高分辨率和明亮的屏幕,快速的Wi-Fi,良好的性能和快速的内存。

然而,realme手机是否适合自己,也在很大程度上取决于自己的使用行为。例如,没有NFC。如果你反正不使用近场通信,或者只是很少使用,这不是一个问题。但是,如果你是谷歌支付等移动支付服务的粉丝,realme C35可能就不适合了。在这个价格范围内,你不应该期待5G,当你想在本地访问移动互联网时,也不应该期待广泛的旅行能力。

realme C35在经济型手机中绝对有独特的卖点,它的内存非常快,运行时间长,全高清屏幕。

因此,在购买之前,你应该考虑什么对你来说是重要的。总的来说,C35绝对是一个有趣的产品。

以类似的价格提供OLED屏幕的手机有很多,例如 摩托罗拉Moto G31.凭借其90赫兹的屏幕, 诺基亚G21想与之竞争,但它提供的分辨率比realme C35低。

价格和可用性

你可以在网上商店直接从制造商那里获得手机https://buy.realme.com/eu/goods/209.其他互联网零售商,如Cyberportamazon.de也有realme C35的报价,价格与测试时的RRP差不多。

realme C35 - 05/03/2022 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
82%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
44 / 70 → 63%
Weight
89%
Battery
91%
Display
84%
Games Performance
11 / 64 → 17%
Application Performance
66 / 86 → 77%
Temperature
90%
Noise
100%
Audio
60 / 90 → 67%
Camera
56%
Average
72%
78%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Ninh Duy
Editor of the original article: Ninh Duy - Editorial Assistant - 232429 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008
contact me via: Facebook
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > realme C35智能手机评测--200欧元以下的强大功能
Florian Schmitt, 2022-05- 5 (Update: 2022-05- 5)