realme C35智能手机评测--200欧元以下的强大功能

Name: Realme C35
Brand: Realme

给我更多。 全高清屏幕和UFS存储通常安装在昂贵的手机中。然而，realme将这些功能装进了一部智能手机，只需180欧元（约190美元）就能买到。此外，这款手机有一个大电池，而且相当轻。那么，realme C35是否值得全面推荐？

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 05/05/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone

Test device courtesy of realme Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Realme C35 (C Series)

Processor

UNISOC T616 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G57 MP1

Memory

4 GB

Display

6.60 inch 20:9, 2408 x 1080 pixel 400 PPI, 180 Hz sampling rate, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz

Storage

64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 64 GB

, 46 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1TB, dedicated, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration, gyroscope, proximity

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B5/B8), 4G (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41) , Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.1 x 164.4 x 75.6

Battery

5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 18 Watt charging

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 11

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/1.8, phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/30fps (Camera 1); 2.0MP, f/2.4, macro lens (Camera 2); 2.0MP, f/2.8, depth of field (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0, Videos @720p/30fps

Additional features

Speakers: mono speaker, Keyboard: virtual keyboard, charger, cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.841 W/kg (head), 1.141 W/kg (body), fanless

Weight

189 g

Price

179 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
77.6 %	05/2022	Realme C35 T616, Mali-G57 MP1	189 g	64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.60"	2408x1080
74.9 %	12/2021	Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1	205 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.50"	1600x720
73.8 %	02/2022	Xiaomi Redmi 9C Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320	196 g	128 GB eMMC Flash	6.53"	1600x720
78.5 %	03/2022	Nokia G21 T606, Mali-G57 MP1	190 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.50"	1600x720

外壳和功能 - 有棱有角的设计

而 realme C25Y它的微型USB端口和阴暗的屏幕仍然看起来有点老式，而新一代的realme C35已经让人感觉更先进了。C35有两种配置。

realme C35 64 GB大容量存储/4GB内存：179欧元（约189美元）。
realme C35 128 GB大容量存储/4GB RAM：199欧元（约210美元）。

realme为其低价智能手机提供了两种颜色的变体。发光的绿色和发光的黑色，都有一个反光的背面和一个从主摄像头发出的漂亮的光折射效果。设计相当有棱角，我们很喜欢，同时智能手机拿在手里也不会有不舒服的感觉。外壳完全由塑料制成。

在稳定性方面，我们相当喜欢realme C35。它几乎不能被扭曲，你必须施加强大的压力，直到液晶上出现明显的斑点。同时，这款手机比较轻，总重量为189克（约6.7盎司）。

NFC的缺失让人有点恼火。这在这个价格范围内并非完全不寻常，但像移动支付这样的应用是不可能的。micro-SD读卡器是独立的，所以它可以同时使用两张SIM卡。在CPDT基准测试中，它的速度相当快，但在复制测试中只达到了同类水平。

尺寸比较

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F (Angelbird V60)	47.8 MB/s +133%
Average of class Smartphone (10.9 - 77, n=98, last 2 years)	28.4 MB/s +39%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C (Angelbird V60)	21.15 MB/s +3%
Nokia G21 (Angelbird V60)	20.6 MB/s 0%
Realme C35 (Angelbird V60)	20.5 MB/s

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø37.9 (18.7-45.1)

Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø32.3 (23.2-38.8)

Xiaomi Redmi 9C PowerVR GE8320, Helio G35, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø37 (26-47.6)

Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø30.5 (12.9-38.6)

Realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø78.4 (34.6-83.9)

Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø50.2 (31.6-54.4)

Xiaomi Redmi 9C PowerVR GE8320, Helio G35, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø73.4 (15.2-76.3)

Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75.5 (39.6-81.6)

通信、软件和操作 - realme手机中的快速WLAN

由于支持Wi-Fi 5，realme C35在我们与参考路由器华硕GT-AXE11000进行的Wi-Fi测试中可以令人信服：它很好地使用了该技术，速率在300至350Mbps之间，总体上也相当稳定。

在无线网络方面，我们不得不使用LTE；5G是不存在的。此外，只有少数频率可用。我们评测样本的LTE支持对中欧来说是足够的，但在远行之前，你应该检查你是否能在目的地国家使用移动互联网。在手机接收的样本测试中，这款智能手机并没有被证明是高端智能手机的水平，但它至少可以提供一半的信号强度，甚至在大多数时间里在室内。

realme UI被预装为软件界面；它是基于Android 11。安全更新是在测试时从2022年4月开始的，所以它们是非常最新的。这是非常令人高兴的，特别是对于这样一款廉价的智能手机。你必须忍受一些以广告为目的的第三方应用程序，但它们可以毫无问题地被卸载。

指纹传感器位于外壳的右侧。用右手的拇指和左手的食指可以很容易地接触到它。你必须忍受解锁时的短暂延迟，但手指识别的准确性非常好。通过前置摄像头进行的面部识别也可用于解锁。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Redmi 9C 802.11 b/g/n	47.7 (14^min - 69^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F 802.11 b/g/n	42.9 (21^min - 65^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F 802.11 b/g/n	50.4 (41^min - 57^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi 9C 802.11 b/g/n	35.8 (19^min - 52^max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Realme C35 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	347 (309^min - 366^max) MBit/s
Nokia G21 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	339 (328^min - 362^max) MBit/s -2%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Nokia G21 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	299 (224^min - 315^max) MBit/s +23%
Realme C35 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	244 (179^min - 255^max) MBit/s

Realme C35; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø244 (179-255)

Realme C35; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø347 (309-366)

照相机--希望成为上层社会的一员

凭借其5000万像素的摄像头，realme C35似乎可以与更昂贵的 realme GT 2 Pro.然而，我们的测试设备有一个没有图像稳定功能的三星图像传感器，而且像素相当小。至少它还使用了像素分档，所以用户可以选择是以5000万像素的质量拍摄，还是以1200万像素的质量和更高的光敏度拍摄。

图像质量很快显示，传感器无法跟上高质量的智能手机相机。颜色有时看起来很平淡，细节也会丢失。在周围环境中，天空看起来明显有颗粒感。在低光照和高对比度的情况下，黑暗区域几乎看不到细节，图像清晰度只有中等水平。realme C35的照片很好，但对于其价格范围来说是平均水平。

用主摄像头进行视频录制可以达到全高清和30帧/秒。自动对焦和亮度调节工作得相当好，整体图片质量令人满意。一个低分辨率的微距摄像头可用于特写，第三个摄像头仅用于支持，不拍摄自己的照片。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera Plant Main camera Environment Main camera Low Light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

显示屏 - 高分辨率realme屏幕

realme C35的显示屏非常明亮，亮度高达582cd/m²，并且在其价格范围内具有较高的分辨率，具有扩展的全高清分辨率。然而，色彩再现只是适度准确，这并不因设置中可选择的不同模式而改变。

此外，这款智能手机的黑值相当高，为0.6cd/m²，因此只能达到一般的对比度。该显示屏不使用PWM。总的来说，realme C35的屏幕具有高分辨率和高亮度，与同价位的其他手机屏幕相比有两个重量级的优势。


582 cd/m²	562 cd/m²	518 cd/m²
571 cd/m²	585 cd/m²	532 cd/m²
555 cd/m²	579 cd/m²	541 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 585 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 558.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 585 cd/m²
Contrast: 975:1 (Black: 0.6 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 5.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
96% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.228

	Realme C35 IPS, 2408x1080, 6.60	Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F IPS LCD, 1600x720, 6.50	Xiaomi Redmi 9C IPS, 1600x720, 6.53	Nokia G21 IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
Response Times		-29%	-31%	-35%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	50 ?(29, 21)	58 ?(31, 27) -16%	60 ?(27, 33) -20%	64 ?(31, 33) -28%
Response Time Black / White *	24 ?(9, 13)	34 ?(17, 17) -42%	34 ?(17, 17) -42%	34 ?(17, 17) -42%
PWM Frequency		178.6 ?(7)	17120
Screen		8%	-5%	-8%
Brightness middle	585	446 -24%	467 -20%	492 -16%
Brightness	558	423 -24%	417 -25%	484 -13%
Brightness Distribution	89	88 -1%	83 -7%	86 -3%
Black Level *	0.6	0.29 52%	0.53 12%	0.46 23%
Contrast	975	1538 58%	881 -10%	1070 10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.4	4.94 -12%	4.14 6%	6.02 -37%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.77	8.81 -0%	8.49 3%	9.13 -4%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	5.9	5.1 14%	6 -2%	7.1 -20%
Gamma	2.228 ^99%	2.145 ^103%	2.291 ^96%	2.345 ^94%
CCT	8001 ^81%	7890 ^82%	7536 ^86%	8918 ^73%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-11% / 1%	-18% / -11%	-22% / -13%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 9 ms rise
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
50 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 29 ms rise
50 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

性能、排放和电池寿命 - 良好的性能，良好的运行时间

笔记本电脑 Unisoc T616SoC在realme C35的价格段中提供了良好的性能率。然而，这并不意味着你应该期待完全流畅的滚动或在网站上超快的加载图片。realme手机仍然是一个相当便宜的智能手机，你不应该期待上层的性能。

至少realme安装了非常快的UFS 2.2存储，这很容易超过其他价格范围内的手机，并有助于在某种程度上获得更流畅的体验和更快的复杂应用程序的加载时间。

外壳上的升温仍在限制范围内，最高温度为40.9℃（106°F）。

底部边缘的小扬声器即使在最大音量下也不会过载，在最大音量为85.5 dB(A)时，足以让一个中等大小的房间充满声音。同时，声音是非常重的高音，因此听起来相当薄。

如果你想正确地享受音乐或电影的声音，你应该连接扬声器或耳机，这可以通过3.5毫米插孔或蓝牙5.0实现。支持aptX HD，但最新的编解码器如aptX低延迟或aptX自适应则不支持。

realme C35的电池寿命几乎达到16小时，在同类产品中和一般情况下绝对令人信服。因此，即使是密集使用的两个工作日也不应该是一个问题。此外，这款手机通过附带的充电器以高达18瓦的功率充电，因此在不到2小时内就能再次充满电。

Geekbench 5.5 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Realme C35 UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	298 Points
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	178 Points -40%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	149 Points -50%
Nokia G21 UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	312 Points +5%
Average UNISOC T616 (298 - 380, n=7)	351 Points +18%
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 2138, n=219, last 2 years)	913 Points +206%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Realme C35 UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	1184 Points
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	1087 Points -8%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	538 Points -55%
Nokia G21 UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	1185 Points 0%
Average UNISOC T616 (1184 - 1502, n=7)	1410 Points +19%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6681, n=219, last 2 years)	2996 Points +153%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Realme C35 UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	8066 Points
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	5739 Points -29%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	5208 Points -35%
Nokia G21 UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	7805 Points -3%
Average UNISOC T616 (7936 - 8066, n=6)	8004 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (4761 - 21385, n=214, last 2 years)	11787 Points +46%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Realme C35 UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	1710 Points
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	1273 Points -26%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	843 Points -51%
Nokia G21 UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	1414 Points -17%
Average UNISOC T616 (1657 - 1710, n=3)	1689 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (704 - 23024, n=114, last 2 years)	9351 Points +447%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Realme C35 UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	1518 Points
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	1142 Points -25%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	799 Points -47%
Nokia G21 UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	1255 Points -17%
Average UNISOC T616 (1484 - 1518, n=3)	1505 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (607 - 45492, n=113, last 2 years)	16352 Points +977%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Realme C35 UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	3063 Points
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	2032 Points -34%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	1043 Points -66%
Nokia G21 UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	2546 Points -17%
Average UNISOC T616 (2798 - 3063, n=3)	2954 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=113, last 2 years)	4426 Points +44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Realme C35 UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	1103 Points
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	863 Points -22%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	445 Points -60%
Nokia G21 UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	945 Points -14%
Average UNISOC T616 (1067 - 1103, n=5)	1082 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 7890, n=105, last 2 years)	2755 Points +150%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Realme C35 UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	935 Points
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	738 Points -21%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	377 Points -60%
Nokia G21 UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	806 Points -14%
Average UNISOC T616 (910 - 935, n=5)	919 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 9814, n=105, last 2 years)	2751 Points +194%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Realme C35 UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	2959 Points
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	2031 Points -31%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	1194 Points -60%
Nokia G21 UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	2379 Points -20%
Average UNISOC T616 (2688 - 2959, n=5)	2854 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 4679, n=105, last 2 years)	3163 Points +7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Realme C35 UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	1109 Points
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	867 Points -22%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	491 Points -56%
Nokia G21 UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	959 Points -14%
Average UNISOC T616 (1089 - 1109, n=5)	1104 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=182, last 2 years)	6737 Points +507%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Realme C35 UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	939 Points
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	736 Points -22%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	425 Points -55%
Nokia G21 UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	814 Points -13%
Average UNISOC T616 (927 - 940, n=5)	936 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=181, last 2 years)	9723 Points +935%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Realme C35 UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	3036 Points
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	2109 Points -31%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	1073 Points -65%
Nokia G21 UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	2559 Points -16%
Average UNISOC T616 (2798 - 3036, n=5)	2956 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (938 - 8480, n=181, last 2 years)	4224 Points +39%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Realme C35 UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	463 Points
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	428 Points -8%
Nokia G21 UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	397 Points -14%
Average UNISOC T616 (463 - 479, n=6)	472 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (395 - 9839, n=135, last 2 years)	2555 Points +452%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Realme C35 UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	464 Points
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	426 Points -8%
Nokia G21 UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	393 Points -15%
Average UNISOC T616 (464 - 478, n=6)	473 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 20068, n=203, last 2 years)	6280 Points +1253%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Realme C35 UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	129 Points
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	116 Points -10%
Nokia G21 UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	111 Points -14%
Average UNISOC T616 (127 - 132, n=6)	129 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 5226, n=207, last 2 years)	1689 Points +1209%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Realme C35 UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	126 Points
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	117 Points -7%
Nokia G21 UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	110 Points -13%
Average UNISOC T616 (126 - 127, n=6)	126.5 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (110 - 5248, n=202, last 2 years)	1698 Points +1248%

GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Realme C35 UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	5.4 fps
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	11 fps +104%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	7.5 fps +39%
Nokia G21 UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	9.5 fps +76%
Average UNISOC T616 (5.4 - 6, n=6)	5.7 fps +6%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=226, last 2 years)	44 fps +715%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Realme C35 UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	6.1 fps
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	6.2 fps +2%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	4.1 fps -33%
Nokia G21 UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	5.2 fps -15%
Average UNISOC T616 (6.1 - 6.2, n=6)	6.15 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 229, n=226, last 2 years)	64.3 fps +954%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Realme C35 UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	3.4 fps
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	7 fps +106%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	4.8 fps +41%
Nokia G21 UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	6 fps +76%
Average UNISOC T616 (3.4 - 3.8, n=6)	3.62 fps +6%
Average of class Smartphone (2.8 - 119, n=226, last 2 years)	32.8 fps +865%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Realme C35 UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	2.2 fps
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	2.2 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	1.5 fps -32%
Nokia G21 UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	2 fps -9%
Average UNISOC T616 (2.2 - 2.3, n=6)	2.23 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 94, n=226, last 2 years)	25.6 fps +1064%

	Realme C35	Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F	Xiaomi Redmi 9C	Nokia G21	Average 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-65%	-59%	-56%	7%	122%
Sequential Read 256KB	907.1	302.3 -67%	263.1 -71%	257.6 -72%	758 ?(485 - 940, n=17) -16%	1508 ?(226 - 4512, n=218, last 2 years) 66%
Sequential Write 256KB	271.1	74.5 -73%	208.4 -23%	180.6 -33%	400 ?(120.6 - 519, n=17) 48%	1118 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=218, last 2 years) 312%
Random Read 4KB	137.8	77.8 -44%	54.5 -60%	74 -46%	154.9 ?(88.5 - 220, n=17) 12%	247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=218, last 2 years) 79%
Random Write 4KB	206.4	47.21 -77%	39.7 -81%	60.2 -71%	176.3 ?(95.4 - 216, n=17) -15%	272 ?(13 - 709, n=218, last 2 years) 32%

温度

Max. Load

Idle


40.9 °C	37.4 °C	37.2 °C
40.1 °C	37.6 °C	36.8 °C
39.7 °C	37.5 °C	37.3 °C

Maximum: 40.9 °C
Average: 38.3 °C


33.5 °C	36.2 °C	39.8 °C
34.4 °C	36.1 °C	40.1 °C
34.4 °C	37.1 °C	39.8 °C

Maximum: 40.1 °C
Average: 36.8 °C

Power Supply (max.) 39.9 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.3 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

演讲者

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Realme C35 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Nokia G21 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命

	Realme C35 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi 9C 5000 mAh	Nokia G21 5050 mAh	Average of class Smartphone
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing	958	879 -8%	905 -6%	1087 13%	914 ?(424 - 2844, n=228, last 2 years) -5%

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing		15h 58min

Pros

+ 明亮的全高清屏幕

+ 运行时间长

+ 低重量

+ 快如闪电的内存

+ 快速的WiFi 5

Cons

- 易受指纹影响

- 没有NFC

- 少数LTE频率

结论 - 一个好的提议，但不适合所有人

realme C35是其他200欧元（约211美元）以下廉价智能手机的良好替代品。这主要是由于良好的电池寿命与足够快的充电技术相搭配，高分辨率和明亮的屏幕，快速的Wi-Fi，良好的性能和快速的内存。

然而，realme手机是否适合自己，也在很大程度上取决于自己的使用行为。例如，没有NFC。如果你反正不使用近场通信，或者只是很少使用，这不是一个问题。但是，如果你是谷歌支付等移动支付服务的粉丝，realme C35可能就不适合了。在这个价格范围内，你不应该期待5G，当你想在本地访问移动互联网时，也不应该期待广泛的旅行能力。

realme C35在经济型手机中绝对有独特的卖点，它的内存非常快，运行时间长，全高清屏幕。

因此，在购买之前，你应该考虑什么对你来说是重要的。总的来说，C35绝对是一个有趣的产品。

以类似的价格提供OLED屏幕的手机有很多，例如摩托罗拉Moto G31.凭借其90赫兹的屏幕，诺基亚G21想与之竞争，但它提供的分辨率比realme C35低。

价格和可用性

你可以在网上商店直接从制造商那里获得手机https://buy.realme.com/eu/goods/209.其他互联网零售商，如Cyberport或amazon.de也有realme C35的报价，价格与测试时的RRP差不多。

Realme C35 - 2022-05-03 05/03/2022 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis

82%

Keyboard

65 / 75 → 87%

Pointing Device

93%

Connectivity

44 / 70 → 63%

Weight

89%

Battery

91%

Display

84%

Games Performance

11 / 64 → 17%

Application Performance

66 / 86 → 77%

Temperature

90%

Noise

100%

Audio

60 / 90 → 67%

Camera

56%

Average

72%

78%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 389263 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > realme C35智能手机评测--200欧元以下的强大功能

Florian Schmitt, 2022-05- 5 (Update: 2022-05- 5)

realme C35智能手机评测--200欧元以下的强大功能

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳和功能 - 有棱有角的设计

尺寸比较

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

通信、软件和操作 - realme手机中的快速WLAN

照相机--希望成为上层社会的一员

显示屏 - 高分辨率realme屏幕

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能、排放和电池寿命 - 良好的性能，良好的运行时间

温度

演讲者

Realme C35 audio analysis

Nokia G21 audio analysis

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

结论 - 一个好的提议，但不适合所有人

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare