Notebookcheck Logo

小米Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G智能手机评论。具备120赫兹AMOLED的全能型手机,价格低廉

金童。 小米Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G拥有很多设备。骁龙695 5G为这款6.67英寸的手机提供了不错的性能,其120赫兹的AMOLED显示屏可以管理超过1000尼特的亮度。更不用说108MP的摄像头和67瓦的快速充电。我们的评论揭示了小米Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G是否有潜力成为中档机的冠军。
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

小米的红米系列享有广泛的知名度,因为它提供具有良好性价比的入门级和中档智能手机。AMOLED屏幕和120赫兹刷新率等功能并不少见。这两点在我们的评测候选机--小米Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G中也有。

这款6.67英寸的设备价格约为300美元(取决于具体配置),与去年的 Redmi Note 10 Pro,但仍有一些进步。这些包括更快的SoC,5G,以及更高的充电速度。在这篇评论中,我们将了解Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G是否符合其作为一个体面的全能型设备的预期作用。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G (Redmi Note Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 8 x 1.7 - 2.2 GHz, Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A77) / Silver (Cortex-A55)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 619
Memory
6 GB 
, LPDDR4X
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, capacitive, AMOLED, FHD+, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 97 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm headset jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB (exFAT supported), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity sensor, Accelerometer, Electronic compass, Gyroscope, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3, IR-Blaster
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Bands 1/2/4/5/8/19), 4G (Bands 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/17/18/19/20/26/28/32/38/40/41/66), 5G (Bands 1/3/5/7/8/20/28/38/40/41/66/77/78), Head SAR 0.596 W/kg, Body SAR 0.956 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.12 x 164.19 x 76.1
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 108 MPix (f/1.9, 1/1.52", 0.7µm) + 8MP ultra wide camera (f/2.2, FOV 118°) + 2MP macro camera (f/2.4), videos up to [email protected]
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.4
Additional features
Speakers: dual speakers, Keyboard: virtual, 67W charger, USB cable (type A/C), SIM eject tool, Protective case, Quick start guide, Warranty card, MIUI 13, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
202 g, Power Supply: 99 g
Price
380 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
81.9 %
08/2022
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
202 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080
83.7 %
04/2021
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
SD 732G, Adreno 618
193 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080
81.7 %
07/2022
Motorola Moto G82 5G
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
173 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.60"2400x1080
80.8 %
08/2022
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
195 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.59"2412x1080
80.2 %
05/2022
realme 9 5G
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
191 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2412x1080
83.4 %
06/2022
Samsung Galaxy A53
Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4
189 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080

外壳 - 带有波浪形光学器件的角形玻璃外壳

小米提供Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G的外壳颜色石墨灰 (黑色)、极地白 (白色)和大西洋蓝 (蓝色)。玻璃后盖几乎不受指纹影响,在蓝色变体中也有别致的灯光效果。根据观察角度,反射看起来像水的流动,这在明亮的环境光线下特别明显。小米 小米Poco X4 Pro 5G例如,在其后盖上提供了类似的颜色效果。

包括1.08亿像素主摄像头在内的摄像头模块从后盖突出了近4毫米,导致智能手机在桌子上来回晃动得很厉害。即使附带的保护罩也不能完全防止这种情况。AMOLED屏幕受到大猩猩5号玻璃的保护,在制造过程中,屏幕上贴有保护膜。

Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G的高度为8.1毫米,与Redmi Note 10 Pro一样纤细,但采用了更平坦、更有棱角的设计,确保握持时的安全。然而,这款智能手机的重量为202克,并不完全是轻的。

Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G的框架是由塑料制成的,与玻璃背面和AMOLED面板一起,形成了一个坚实的单元,感觉是高质量的。这同样适用于按钮,包括集成了指纹传感器的电源按钮,它们牢牢地坐在框架中。由于通过了IP53认证,Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G具有防尘和防水功能,但不应该去游泳。

尺寸比较

164.3 mm 75.6 mm 8.5 mm 195 g164.3 mm 75.6 mm 8.5 mm 191 g164.19 mm 76.1 mm 8.12 mm 202 g164 mm 76.5 mm 8.1 mm 193 g160.9 mm 74.5 mm 8 mm 173 g159.6 mm 74.8 mm 8.1 mm 189 g

设备 - 两种储存方式

小米提供Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G的两个存储版本。较小的版本有6GB LPDDR4X内存和128GB UFS 2.2存储空间,较大的版本有8/128GB。我们的评测设备在交付时仍有约97GB可用。内部存储可以通过microSD卡扩展,其大小可以达到1TB。

Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G的支持OTG的USB端口以USB 2.0速度运行。两个扬声器中的一个(第二个在顶部)和SIM卡插槽也位于底部。可以插入两张nano-SIM卡或一张nano-SIM卡和一张microSD卡。

除了NFC和蓝牙5.1,每个配置还包括一个3.5毫米耳机插孔,一个红外线发射器,以及电源按钮中的指纹传感器。还包括一个常开功能。然而,显示屏不是永久激活的,而只是在点击屏幕后的10秒内显示时间和电池状态等信息。

左边:没有端口
左边:没有端口
右边:音量摇杆,电源按钮
右边:音量摇杆,电源按钮
顶部:3.5毫米插孔,扬声器,麦克风,红外辐射器
顶部:3.5毫米插孔,扬声器,麦克风,红外辐射器
底部:扬声器、麦克风、USB-C 2.0、SIM/MicroSD插槽
底部:扬声器、麦克风、USB-C 2.0、SIM/MicroSD插槽

微型SD卡读卡器

Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G通过我们的Angelbird AV Pro V60 microSD参考卡实现了体面的microSD传输率。在连续读取和写入方面,它们属于正常范围,平均速度分别为78MB/s和32MB/s。然而,在JPG复制测试中,这款microSD读卡器的表现并不理想,只能达到微薄的12MByte/s。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
28.9 MB/s ∼100% +138%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
27.5 MB/s ∼95% +127%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
26.3 MB/s ∼91% +117%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
13.29 MB/s ∼46% +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12.13 MB/s ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
10.9 MB/s ∼38% -10%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø32.6 (24.4-44)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø78.2 (34.6-89.2)

软件--只需Android 11的小米智能手机

Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G运行Android 11和小米的MIUI用户界面,该界面后来被更新到13版本。在审查时(8月中旬),Android 安全补丁是从7月1日开始的,因此相当符合最新情况。预装的第三方应用程序如Facebook、Tiktok和Spotify都可以被删除。

由于DRM Widevine L1的支持,小米Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G也能以高清质量播放流媒体。

小米Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
小米Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
小米Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
小米Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
小米Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
小米Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
小米Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
小米Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G

通信和GNSS - 5G、WiFi 5和良好的GPS

Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G支持所有对欧洲很重要的4G和5G频率,因此在欧盟地区应该几乎没有任何接收问题。

关于WLAN,小米智能手机使用WiFi 5来与附近的路由器建立连接。通过我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器,Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G在发送和接收方向上实现了平均约350MBit/s的WLAN传输率,这对于这个价格范围来说完全可以接受。数据传输也非常稳定。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (44.3 - 1736, n=116, last 2 years)
608 MBit/s ∼100% +76%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
352 (339min - 360max) MBit/s ∼58% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
346 (334min - 353max) MBit/s ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
345 (328min - 351max) MBit/s ∼57% 0%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
342 (321min - 351max) MBit/s ∼56% -1%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
341 (330min - 352max) MBit/s ∼56% -1%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (57.7 - 1710, n=118, last 2 years)
657 MBit/s ∼100% +86%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
364 (349min - 382max) MBit/s ∼55% +3%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
363 (354min - 376max) MBit/s ∼55% +3%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
362 (329min - 376max) MBit/s ∼55% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
354 (180min - 373max) MBit/s ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
269 (255min - 281max) MBit/s ∼41% -24%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 953, n=146, last 2 years)
461 MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
331 (158min - 339max) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 transmit AX12
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1368, n=145, last 2 years)
488 MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
283 (148min - 297max) MBit/s ∼58%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø345 (334-353)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø348 (180-373)
室内的GPS信号
室内的GPS信号
室外的GPS信号
室外的GPS信号

Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G在卫星导航系统GPS(L1)、Glonass(L1)、Galileo(E1)和Beidou(B1)的帮助下确定了自己的位置。在测试中,这在室内和室外都能准确地工作到3米,而且每次只需要几秒钟。

正如我们骑车所显示的那样,小米手机在现实世界的条件下也能提供准确的定位数据。这款智能手机的表现几乎与Garmin Venu2健身手表一样好,后者被用来直接比较。它偶尔会在路线上走一两个小弯路,但总体准确度完全可以满足导航任务。

GPS测试:总结
GPS测试:总结
GPS测试:环湖航行
GPS测试:环湖航行
GPS测试:循环
GPS测试:循环

电话和语音质量

小米智能手机的语音质量非常好。Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G即使在免提模式下也能非常清晰地再现声音,即使在嘈杂的环境中,噪音抑制仍然可靠地工作。在我们测试4G和5G网络的通话中,没有背景噪音或其他异常情况。辐射值为0.596 W/kg(头部SAR)和SAR 0.956 W/kg(身体SAR),相对较低。

小米的智能手机可以容纳两张nano-SIM卡或一张nano-SIM卡和一张microSD卡。支持VoLTE和WLAN通话。

照相机 - 108MP相机,配备三星HM2

用自拍相机拍照
用自拍相机拍照

小米Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G的相机设置与10 Pro的相机设置基本相同。Redmi Note 10 Pro108MP主摄像头(f/1.9)仍然基于三星HM2,它使用9-in-1像素分选拍摄12MP照片。还有一个800万像素的超广角摄像头,视野为118°(f/2.2)和一个1600万像素的自拍摄像头(f/2.4)。后者能提供良好的图像质量,并能拍摄连贯的肖像照片。

小米已经取消了5MP微距相机和2MP深度传感器。 Redmi Note 10 Pro从审查样本中删除。Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G中没有4个摄像头,只有3个:上述主摄像头和超广角摄像头与一个200万像素微距摄像头(f/2.4)一起。

在最佳照明条件下用主摄像头拍摄的照片看起来非常好。由于自然的色彩、高图像清晰度和良好的动态范围,这些照片令人愉悦。在环境光线较弱的情况下,相机软件仍然可以从被摄对象身上得到很多东西。

然而,夜景拍摄并不是该相机的强项。与NotebookCheck吉祥物的设置只是黑暗和模糊的。尽管有像素储备,它在变焦拍摄方面也有困难。在测试照片中,图像细节在5倍放大率下模糊成一个像素的模样。

800万像素的超广角摄像头做得还不错。然而,你必须习惯于相当艳丽的色彩和明显向照片边缘降低的清晰度。

主摄像头、超广角摄像头和自拍摄像头都有电子稳定功能,但仅限于全高清质量和30 FPS。这是由于SoC的原因,因为 骁龙695 5G,与 骁龙732G在Redmi Note 10 Pro中,不支持4K视频,而在Redmi Note 10 Pro中仍然可以。

用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用广角相机拍照
用广角相机拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight shot 1Daylight shot 2Ultra wide angle5x zoomLow light shot

我们在受控的照明条件下再次仔细观察了这款10800万像素的相机。在最佳照明条件下,相机非常准确地再现了ColorChecker参考卡的颜色,除了某些绿色和棕色的色调之外,还鲜明地再现了测试图表。然而,在1勒克斯的余光下,什么也看不到。

ColorChecker
17.7 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
12 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
10 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
5 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
8 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G: 8.16 ∆E min: 1.2 - max: 17.73 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.5 ∆E
54.8 ∆E
39.6 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
45.1 ∆E
63.7 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
36 ∆E
43.4 ∆E
27.8 ∆E
66.2 ∆E
65 ∆E
31.3 ∆E
48.6 ∆E
37.2 ∆E
77.5 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
46.3 ∆E
94.4 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37.1 ∆E
24.6 ∆E
14 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G: 47.56 ∆E min: 14.02 - max: 94.37 ∆E

配件和保修 - 保护套和67瓦的电源适配器

小米Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G配有一个67瓦的电源适配器,一条USB线(A型到C型),一个SIM卡工具,一个保护套,以及一份快速启动指南。制造商没有在其在线商店为其智能手机提供特殊配件。

该智能手机在德国提供24个月的保修。这可能因地区而异,所以在购买前一定要向你的供应商查询。

输入设备和操作 - 响应的120赫兹显示器

由于其刷新率为120赫兹,Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G可以流畅地使用,并对输入做出非常准确的反应。然而,高刷新率必须首先在显示设置中启用,因为默认设置是60HZ。

小米手机的指纹传感器位于电源键上,用右手的拇指和左手的食指和中指就可以轻松触及。指纹解锁工作可靠且非常迅速,因为主屏幕的显示没有任何明显延迟。

通过人脸识别进行认证,可以提供与指纹传感器类似的高命中率和速度。然而,作为一个纯粹的软件解决方案,人脸解锁的安全性较低,而且还需要足够的环境光线才能完美地工作。

门禁模式下的键盘
门禁模式下的键盘
横向模式下的键盘
横向模式下的键盘

显示屏 - AMOLED面板,最高可达1000尼特

子像素网格
子像素网格

小米Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G有一个120赫兹的快速AMOLED显示屏。在2400x1080(FHD+)下,它提供的分辨率与Redmi Note 10 Pro。因为外形因素也没有改变,像素密度仍然是395PPI,这保证了显示的清晰度。你需要一个放大镜来寻找图像参数的差异。原则上,这不是一个缺点,因为Redmi Note 10 Pro在测试中的显示效果已经给人留下了非常好的印象。

在白色背景下,Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G的AMOLED面板以平均686 cd/m²的亮度闪耀。如果你在一个较小的显示区域重复测试(APL18测量),亮度甚至增加到1073 cd/m²。如果没有亮度传感器,最高可以达到433 cd/m²。在最低的亮度设置下,屏幕仍然以2.72 cd/m²的亮度闪耀。

AMOLED面板通过脉冲宽度调制控制其亮度。在屏幕亮度为54%或更低时,PWM闪烁的频率范围相当高,在162.1至521.5赫兹之间移动。在屏幕亮度高于54%的情况下,这是一个恒定的120赫兹。然而,在这个范围内(>54%),振幅课程的波动要低得多,所以敏感的用户应该不会被PWM闪烁所困扰。

682
cd/m²
671
cd/m²
693
cd/m²
683
cd/m²
675
cd/m²
694
cd/m²
687
cd/m²
687
cd/m²
703
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 703 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 686.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.72 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 675 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.2
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.5
90.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.16
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Motorola Moto G82 5G
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.60
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
IPS, 2412x1080, 6.59
realme 9 5G
IPS, 2412x1080, 6.60
Samsung Galaxy A53
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50
Screen
4%
-70%
-136%
-105%
-7%
Brightness middle
675
653
-3%
635
-6%
590
-13%
589
-13%
718
6%
Brightness
686
651
-5%
640
-7%
561
-18%
561
-18%
730
6%
Brightness Distribution
95
98
3%
96
1%
92
-3%
90
-5%
92
-3%
Black Level *
0.38
0.5
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.3
1.2
8%
2.96
-128%
5.15
-296%
4.33
-233%
1.62
-25%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.9
2.9
26%
7.63
-96%
10.35
-165%
8.39
-115%
4.21
-8%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.7
1.8
-6%
4.8
-182%
7.1
-318%
5.9
-247%
2
-18%
Gamma
2.16 102%
2.25 98%
2.214 99%
2.143 103%
2.063 107%
2.156 102%
CCT
6591 99%
6426 101%
6970 93%
8540 76%
8021 81%
6545 99%
Contrast
1553
1178

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 521.5 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 521.5 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 521.5 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19590 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最小面板亮度
最低限度
25%的面板亮度
25%
50%的面板亮度
50%
75%的面板亮度
75%
最大的手动面板亮度
100%

在固定的变焦水平和不同的亮度设置下进行的一系列测量

在显示设置中,你可以从 "生动"、"饱和 "和 "标准 "三个预设中选择颜色方案。此外,色温也可以调整。在 "标准 "设置下,小米手机的显示效果最好。颜色和灰度等级非常接近参考颜色,其他图像参数也是模范的。

色彩保真度(标准色彩方案,sRGB目标色彩空间)
色彩保真度(标准色彩方案,sRGB目标色彩空间)
色彩空间(标准色彩方案,sRGB目标色彩空间)
色彩空间(标准色彩方案,sRGB目标色彩空间)
灰度(标准色彩方案,sRGB目标色彩空间)
灰度(标准色彩方案,sRGB目标色彩空间)
色彩饱和度(标准色彩方案,sRGB目标色彩空间)
色彩饱和度(标准色彩方案,sRGB目标色彩空间)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.07 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5775 ms rise
↘ 0.4905 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.05 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5205 ms rise
↘ 0.5295 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (35.9 ms).

由于其高亮度,Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G适合户外使用,没有重大限制。如果避免阳光直射,可以完美地阅读显示内容。由于AMOLED面板的高视角稳定性,从极端角度看也没有任何问题。

室外使用(阳光直射)。
室外使用(阳光直射)。
室外使用(在阴凉处)。
室外使用(在阴凉处)。
视角
视角

性能 - 骁龙695 5G确保了坚实的性能

骁龙695 5G和其 阿德雷诺619图形芯片使小米Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G的日常性能稳固。偶尔你不得不忍受小的延迟,但整体操作是流畅的。SoC提供的动力也足以应付目前的游戏。

在系统性能方面,Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G与其他配备骁龙695 5G的对比设备没有区别。该 小米Redmi Note 10 Pro配备了 骁龙732G也相差无几。

Geekbench 5.4
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
740 Points ∼100% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1885, n=266, last 2 years)
737 Points ∼100% +8%
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
692 Points ∼94% +1%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
687 Points ∼93% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
684 Points ∼92%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (659 - 697, n=14)
678 Points ∼92% -1%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
671 Points ∼91% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
563 Points ∼76% -18%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 5538, n=266, last 2 years)
2373 Points ∼100% +24%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1998 Points ∼84% +4%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1946 Points ∼82% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1921 Points ∼81%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (1663 - 2038, n=14)
1916 Points ∼81% 0%
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1914 Points ∼81% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
1878 Points ∼79% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1728 Points ∼73% -10%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (111952 - 1119358, n=160, last 2 years)
584886 Points ∼100% +47%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
409976 Points ∼70% +3%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
409358 Points ∼70% +3%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
399726 Points ∼68% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
398622 Points ∼68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (344344 - 409358, n=10)
388907 Points ∼66% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
352259 Points ∼60% -12%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
11470 Points ∼100% +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
10396 Points ∼91%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 19200, n=214, last 2 years)
10362 Points ∼90% 0%
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
9776 Points ∼85% -6%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
9363 Points ∼82% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (6897 - 10834, n=13)
9226 Points ∼80% -11%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7843 Points ∼68% -25%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (226 - 1332, n=97, last 2 years)
775 Points ∼100% +29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
599 Points ∼77%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
593 Points ∼77% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
579 Points ∼75% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (521 - 604, n=10)
575 Points ∼74% -4%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
552 Points ∼71% -8%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 8753, n=179, last 2 years)
4625 Points ∼100% +27%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3705 Points ∼80% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (3171 - 3848, n=11)
3644 Points ∼79% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3638 Points ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3626 Points ∼78% 0%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3596 Points ∼78% -1%
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3535 Points ∼76% -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3365 Points ∼73% -8%
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2083 - 19657, n=179, last 2 years)
8168 Points ∼100% +4%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7986 Points ∼98% +2%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7976 Points ∼98% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7836 Points ∼96%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (6789 - 8072, n=11)
7748 Points ∼95% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
7157 Points ∼88% -9%
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
6969 Points ∼85% -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
5972 Points ∼73% -24%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 11617, n=179, last 2 years)
5204 Points ∼100% +24%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4836 Points ∼93% +16%
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4366 Points ∼84% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (3167 - 4836, n=11)
4329 Points ∼83% +3%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4311 Points ∼83% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4183 Points ∼80%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4043 Points ∼78% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3855 Points ∼74% -8%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 26660, n=179, last 2 years)
8925 Points ∼100% +102%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
5178 Points ∼58% +17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4426 Points ∼50%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4423 Points ∼50% 0%
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4413 Points ∼49% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (4166 - 4426, n=11)
4359 Points ∼49% -2%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4323 Points ∼48% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4086 Points ∼46% -8%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2392, n=179, last 2 years)
1407 Points ∼100% +17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1228 Points ∼87% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
1210 Points ∼86% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (1078 - 1378, n=11)
1208 Points ∼86% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1207 Points ∼86%
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1163 Points ∼83% -4%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1125 Points ∼80% -7%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1103 Points ∼78% -9%
AImark - Score v2.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (1043 - 286905, n=156, last 2 years)
51780 Points ∼100% +901%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
5265 Points ∼10% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (4924 - 5839, n=10)
5173 Points ∼10% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
5172 Points ∼10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4958 Points ∼10% -4%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4924 Points ∼10% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
4714 Points ∼9% -9%

正如预期的那样,配备有骁龙695 5G的智能手机在GPU重度测试中差异不大。然而。 三星的Galaxy A53的表现要好得多,其 Exynos 1280在图形计算方面表现更好。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
621 Points ∼100% +77%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
354 Points ∼57% +1%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
352 Points ∼57% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
351 Points ∼57%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
351 Points ∼57% 0%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
636 Points ∼100% +76%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
363 Points ∼57% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
361 Points ∼57%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
360 Points ∼57% 0%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
356 Points ∼56% -1%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2275 Points ∼100% +89%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1205 Points ∼53%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1204 Points ∼53% 0%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1201 Points ∼53% 0%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1197 Points ∼53% -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1124 Points ∼49% -7%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2293 Points ∼100% +89%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1211 Points ∼53%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1209 Points ∼53% 0%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1206 Points ∼53% 0%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1197 Points ∼52% -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1143 Points ∼50% -6%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2898 Points ∼100% +8%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2883 Points ∼99% +8%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2822 Points ∼97% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2773 Points ∼96% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2689 Points ∼93% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2676 Points ∼92%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3902 Points ∼100% +43%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2749 Points ∼70% +1%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2736 Points ∼70% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2721 Points ∼70%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2710 Points ∼69% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2562 Points ∼66% -6%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3546 Points ∼100% +31%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2778 Points ∼78% +2%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2770 Points ∼78% +2%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2734 Points ∼77% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2711 Points ∼76%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2610 Points ∼74% -4%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3613 Points ∼100%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3561 Points ∼99% -1%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3529 Points ∼98% -2%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3462 Points ∼96% -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3311 Points ∼92% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3097 Points ∼86% -14%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3982 Points ∼100% +33%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3008 Points ∼76% +1%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3001 Points ∼75% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2988 Points ∼75%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2973 Points ∼75% -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2832 Points ∼71% -5%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3746 Points ∼100% +21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3107 Points ∼83%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3104 Points ∼83% 0%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3098 Points ∼83% 0%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3086 Points ∼82% -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2938 Points ∼78% -5%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3455 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3415 Points ∼99% -1%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3411 Points ∼99% -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3375 Points ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2261 Points ∼65% -35%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5172 Points ∼100% +19%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4414 Points ∼85% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4360 Points ∼84%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4346 Points ∼84% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4232 Points ∼82% -3%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4156 Points ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4120 Points ∼99%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4096 Points ∼99% -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4021 Points ∼97% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4021 Points ∼97% -2%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3621 Points ∼100% +23%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2959 Points ∼82% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2955 Points ∼82%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2949 Points ∼81% 0%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2917 Points ∼81% -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2783 Points ∼77% -6%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3939 Points ∼100% +40%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2837 Points ∼72% +1%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2831 Points ∼72% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2819 Points ∼72%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2809 Points ∼71% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2694 Points ∼68% -4%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3554 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3481 Points ∼98% -2%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3455 Points ∼97% -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3372 Points ∼95% -5%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3370 Points ∼95% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2823 Points ∼79% -21%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4645 Points ∼100% +10%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4286 Points ∼92% +2%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4234 Points ∼91% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4215 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3887 Points ∼84% -8%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5510 Points ∼100% +22%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4573 Points ∼83% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4523 Points ∼82%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4496 Points ∼82% -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4038 Points ∼73% -11%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3517 Points ∼100% +3%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3515 Points ∼100% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3403 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3372 Points ∼96% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2997 Points ∼85% -12%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
81 fps ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
81 fps ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
81 fps ∼100%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
60 fps ∼74% -26%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
60 fps ∼74% -26%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
95 fps ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
94 fps ∼99%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
93 fps ∼98% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
92 fps ∼97% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
91 fps ∼96% -3%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
56 fps ∼100% +33%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
43 fps ∼77% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
42 fps ∼75%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
42 fps ∼75% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps ∼71% -5%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
61 fps ∼100% +30%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
48 fps ∼79% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps ∼77%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps ∼77% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
45 fps ∼74% -4%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
35 fps ∼100% +17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps ∼86%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps ∼86% 0%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
30 fps ∼86% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps ∼83% -3%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
38 fps ∼100% +12%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
35 fps ∼92% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps ∼89%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps ∼89% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
33 fps ∼87% -3%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
20 fps ∼100% +18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps ∼85% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps ∼85%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps ∼85% 0%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
17 fps ∼85% 0%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
23 fps ∼100% +21%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
20 fps ∼87% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps ∼83% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps ∼83%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps ∼83% 0%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
15 fps ∼100% +25%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps ∼80% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps ∼80%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps ∼80% 0%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
12 fps ∼80% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps ∼73% -8%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
10 fps ∼100% +22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.2 fps ∼82%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.1 fps ∼81% -1%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.8 fps ∼78% -5%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7.8 fps ∼78% -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.4 fps ∼74% -10%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
23 fps ∼100% +21%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps ∼83% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps ∼83%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps ∼83% 0%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
19 fps ∼83% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps ∼78% -5%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
26 fps ∼100% +18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps ∼85%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps ∼85% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps ∼81% -5%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps ∼81% -5%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
21 fps ∼81% -5%

Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G在浏览器性能方面表现良好。网站加载迅速,显示也很迅速。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (14.8 - 137874, n=177, last 2 years)
852 Points ∼100% +1227%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G (Mi Browser V13.10.0-gn)
64.223 Points ∼8%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
64.165 Points ∼8% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)
63.5 Points ∼7% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (48.6 - 72.3, n=11)
60.2 Points ∼7% -6%
Motorola Moto G82 5G (Chrome 102)
56.647 Points ∼7% -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (Chrome98)
49.47 Points ∼6% -23%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (12.5 - 375, n=163, last 2 years)
70.3 runs/min ∼100% +82%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chome 101)
51.24 runs/min ∼73% +32%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
47.11 runs/min ∼67% +22%
Motorola Moto G82 5G (Chome 102)
44.7 runs/min ∼64% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (38.7 - 47.7, n=9)
43.7 runs/min ∼62% +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (Chrome98)
43.2 runs/min ∼61% +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G (Mi Browser V13.10.0-gn)
38.7 runs/min ∼55%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 292, n=176, last 2 years)
101.9 Points ∼100% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G (Mi Browser V13.10.0-gn)
100 Points ∼98%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
96 Points ∼94% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (75 - 112, n=9)
89.6 Points ∼88% -10%
Motorola Moto G82 5G (Chrome 102)
75 Points ∼74% -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (Chrome98)
71 Points ∼70% -29%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)
69 Points ∼68% -31%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (3905 - 74261, n=196, last 2 years)
26779 Points ∼100% +26%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)
24159 Points ∼90% +14%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
22285 Points ∼83% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (17849 - 27593, n=11)
21915 Points ∼82% +3%
Motorola Moto G82 5G (Chrome 102)
21468 Points ∼80% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G (Mi Browser V13.10.0-gn)
21269 Points ∼79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (Chrome98)
17293 Points ∼65% -19%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (Chrome98)
2832 ms * ∼100% -41%
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 12437, n=186, last 2 years)
2582 ms * ∼91% -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G (Mi Browser V13.10.0-gn)
2013.3 ms * ∼71%
Motorola Moto G82 5G (Chrome 102)
2009.8 ms * ∼71% -0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (1502 - 2501, n=10)
1975 ms * ∼70% +2%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
1922.7 ms * ∼68% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)
1920.3 ms * ∼68% +5%

* ... smaller is better

Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G的存储性能值比 小米的Redmi Note 10 Pro,尽管这两款智能手机在名义上有相同的存储类型,即UFS 2.2形式。但这在日常使用中很难察觉,因为两者在加载应用程序时的速度几乎相同。Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G的无边际优势主要来自其较高的连续写入性能。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProMotorola Moto G82 5GOnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5Grealme 9 5GSamsung Galaxy A53Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-28%
-13%
-10%
-46%
5%
3%
23%
Sequential Read 256KB
523
512
-2%
473.4
-9%
509.21
-3%
511
-2%
510.1
-2%
706 ?(303 - 999, n=36)
35%
993 ?(45.6 - 1999, n=257, last 2 years)
90%
Sequential Write 256KB
488.91
268
-45%
445.7
-9%
482.15
-1%
120.6
-75%
486.7
0%
492 ?(105.3 - 884, n=36)
1%
567 ?(11.9 - 1783, n=257, last 2 years)
16%
Random Read 4KB
204.3
146.5
-28%
180.8
-12%
179.02
-12%
88.5
-57%
229.9
13%
175 ?(89.3 - 253, n=36)
-14%
183.3 ?(13.5 - 543, n=257, last 2 years)
-10%
Random Write 4KB
196.38
126.7
-35%
155.5
-21%
147.46
-25%
95.4
-51%
210.8
7%
173.2 ?(113.8 - 258, n=36)
-12%
184.5 ?(18.4 - 503, n=258, last 2 years)
-6%

游戏--120帧仍然是个例外

小米智能手机能够在游戏中展示其120赫兹屏幕的优势。然而,只有少数游戏能够利用完整的120帧,因为即使是像Armajet这样图形比较简单的游戏,平均也不能达到80帧以上。骁龙骁龙695 5G也提供了足够的动力,在高清/高设置下以稳定的30帧显示《PUBG Mobile》。

游戏帧率是通过我们的Gamebench工具测定的。

氩氦刀
氩氦刀
PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø77.5 (55-104)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G; PUBG Mobile; 2.1.0: Ø29.9 (27-31)

排放--最大功率始终在手

温度

Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G在使用过程中保持低温。经过一小时的压力测试,最高表面温度只达到34.1℃。正如3DMark Wild Life基准测试所显示的,这款骁龙695 5G始终能够以最高性能运行,即使是在永久性负载下。

Max. Load
 34.1 °C33.4 °C30.8 °C 
 34 °C32.6 °C31 °C 
 33.8 °C33.9 °C30.4 °C 
Maximum: 34.1 °C
Average: 32.7 °C
30.8 °C32.2 °C32.5 °C
29.8 °C30.6 °C33.5 °C
30.3 °C31.8 °C32.7 °C
Maximum: 33.5 °C
Average: 31.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  27.5 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.6 % ∼100% 0%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % ∼100% 0%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.5 % ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % ∼100%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.3 % ∼100%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.1 % ∼100% 0%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.1 % ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
97.8 % ∼98% -2%
012345678910111213Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø2.16 (2.16-2.17)
Motorola Moto G82 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø2.16 (2.16-2.18)
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø2.15 (2.14-2.16)
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø3.81 (3.75-3.84)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.23 (7.21-7.25)
Motorola Moto G82 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.24 (7.23-7.27)
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.21 (7.21-7.23)
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.7 (13.7-13.7)

发言人

Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G的立体声扬声器声音很好,能以87.6 dB(A)的音量相对大声播放。中音和高音非常均衡,而低音在声音组合中几乎完全没有。然而,音频连接听起来并不特别清晰或不失真--信噪比只有微弱的61.4dBFS。

耳机和扬声器可以通过3.5毫米插孔或蓝牙5.1与智能手机配对。Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G支持常见的蓝牙编解码,如AAC、SBC、LDAC、aptX和aptX HD。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.641.2252930.53127.825.74025.822.65032.528.56322.423.38024.520.610019.43312516.541.916018.448.120012.848.82509.952.231511.354.940013.15650011.466.56301169.480011.670.6100012.374.612501275.9160012.475.5200012.276.625001376.4315012.876.5400013.278.4500013.479.1630013.876.9800013.370.31000013.363.31250013.567.91600013.161.3SPL24.987.6N0.670.6median 13median 69.4Delta0.710.939.633.634.726.824.72823.534.242.443.428.431.423.931.520.43215.333.42046.214.644.313.151.81459.61163.210.3681170.310.273.410.375.810.874.510.977.511.680.812.279.512.28012.577.813.478.513.176.51574.213.873.914.165.11660.624.789.30.677.5median 13.1median 73.4210.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命 - 51分钟内快速充电

消耗功率

小米手机的耗电量并不显眼。它比大多数对比设备更节能,在负载下仅有不到2.8瓦的功率。

5000毫安时的电池可以通过附带的67瓦的电源适配器快速充电。我们记录了智能手机电池从0到100%完全充电的51分钟。21分钟后,电池达到50%,35分钟后达到80%。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.06 / 0.19 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.96 / 2.31 / 2.34 Watt
Load midlight 2.88 / 4.88 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
5020 mAh
Motorola Moto G82 5G
5000 mAh
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A53
5000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-8%
14%
27%
-13%
9%
-7%
Idle Minimum *
0.96
1.05
-9%
0.9
6%
0.8
17%
0.9
6%
0.83 ?(0.56 - 1.01, n=10)
14%
0.887 ?(0.12 - 2.5, n=194, last 2 years)
8%
Idle Average *
2.31
1.8
22%
1.2
48%
1
57%
1.3
44%
1.653 ?(1 - 2.47, n=10)
28%
1.568 ?(0.65 - 3.6, n=194, last 2 years)
32%
Idle Maximum *
2.34
1.85
21%
1.4
40%
1.4
40%
1.6
32%
1.814 ?(1.4 - 2.52, n=10)
22%
1.783 ?(0.69 - 3.7, n=194, last 2 years)
24%
Load Average *
2.88
4.2
-46%
3.3
-15%
2.4
17%
5.7
-98%
3.23 ?(2.4 - 4.83, n=10)
-12%
4.36 ?(2.1 - 7.74, n=194, last 2 years)
-51%
Load Maximum *
4.88
6.29
-29%
5.2
-7%
4.6
6%
7.3
-50%
5.11 ?(4.47 - 6.5, n=10)
-5%
7.17 ?(3.56 - 11.9, n=194, last 2 years)
-47%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G: Ø2.96 (1.151-5.46)
Motorola Moto G82 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G: Ø3.72 (1.423-6.41)
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G: Ø2.65 (0.76-4.99)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.40.70.91.11.31.61.822.22.52.72.93.13.33.63.844.2Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.14 (2.9-4.32)
Motorola Moto G82 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.55 (3.3-4.19)
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.2 (2.49-4.46)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.362 (1.329-1.504)
Motorola Moto G82 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.044 (0.931-1.229)
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.962 (0.785-1.444)

电池寿命

低能耗和5000毫安时的电池有助于Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G实现良好的电池运行时间。小米的模拟网页浏览持续了约13小时,视频播放持续了约17小时。我们在启用120赫兹显示屏的情况下测量了这些时间。切换到60赫兹当然应该可以多用几分钟。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
39h 26min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
13h 08min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
17h 10min
Load (maximum brightness)
6h 55min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
5020 mAh
Motorola Moto G82 5G
5000 mAh
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
5000 mAh
realme 9 5G
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A53
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-13%
7%
2%
31%
-4%
Reader / Idle
2366
1489
-37%
2456
4%
1985
-16%
2431
3%
H.264
1030
1232
20%
1245
21%
1255
22%
1146
11%
WiFi v1.3
788
753
-4%
1022
30%
1064
35%
1029
31%
886
12%
Load
415
283
-32%
298
-28%
277
-33%
246
-41%

Pros

+ 明亮的AMOLED面板,120赫兹
+ 高质量的做工
+ 功能(NFC、3.5毫米插孔、MicroSD)。
+ 良好的指纹传感器
+ 良好的摄像头
+ 立体声扬声器
+ 电池运行时间长,充电速度快

Cons

- 相当重,202克
- 没有成熟的始终如一的显示屏
- 只有Android 11
- 最大视频分辨率为1080p

对小米Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G的评判

在审查中。小米Redni Note 11 Pro 5G。样品设备由
在审查中。小米Redni Note 11 Pro 5G。样品设备由

小米以Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G的形式推出了一款非常强大的中档智能手机。这款6.67英寸手机最大的优点之一是其高对比度和色彩匹配的AMOLED面板,峰值亮度超过1000尼特。120赫兹的刷新率使操作变得漂亮而流畅。

其余的设备也令人印象深刻。除了5G移动通信和NFC之外,还有一个3.5毫米的插孔和一个微型SD插槽。108万像素的摄像头在白天也能拍出好照片,运行时间也不错,由于采用了67瓦的电源适配器,一次充满电需要不到1小时。

小米Redmi Note 11 Pro是一款装备非常齐全的中档智能手机,价格相对较低。

Redmi Note 11 Pro的潜在买家必须接受它只运行Android 11。但Android 12可能会通过以后的更新来实现。我们还希望小米能改进Always On功能,因为它目前只限制在几秒钟内。

在目前的Redmi Note 11阵容中,Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G排在顶级机型Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G之后。由于两者提供几乎相同的功能,尽管价格明显不同(Pro+的价格高出约70美元),Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G很可能是Redmi Note 11系列中最令许多买家兴奋的智能手机。

小米智能手机的替代品有,例如 摩托罗拉Moto G82 5G三星Galaxy A53这两款手机也提供120赫兹的AMOLED屏幕。

价格和可用性

虽然有一系列的选择--但并不是所有的版本在所有地区都有,也不是所有的版本在国际上都有相同的规格。例如,印度的Note 11 Pro+ 5G与Note 11 Pro 5G相同,有6GB/128GB和8GB/256GB两种颜色,通过Amazon.在英国,6GB/256GB配置的三个变体似乎可以通过亚马逊购买:Note 11 Pro(288.44英镑),Note 11 Pro 5G(269.00英镑)和Note 11 Pro 5G+ (£369.00).美国亚马逊也提供各种配置的智能手机。

价格截止到2022年8月19日,可能会有变化。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G - 08/30/2022 v7
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
84%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
51 / 70 → 73%
Weight
88%
Battery
90%
Display
91%
Games Performance
33 / 64 → 51%
Application Performance
74 / 86 → 86%
Temperature
93%
Noise
100%