小米Redmi Note 10 5G评论。拥有大电池的预算型5G智能手机

随着Redmi Note 9T 5G ,该型号系列的第一款支持现代移动标准的智能手机在今年年初推出。Redmi Note 10 5G与它没有什么不同,它提供了相同的存储配置以及5000毫安时的电池,以及其他东西。Note 10的显示屏略小,但它支持90赫兹。作为回报,它安装了一个稍弱的处理器和较旧的大猩猩玻璃3。
同时,Poco M3 Pro 5G在规格方面是相同的,但它的价格更低,只在设计上有区别。竞争对手通常更加昂贵,但realme 8 5G和Galaxy A32 5G是强有力的替代品。
Possible contenders in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
80.4 % | 08/2021 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2 | 190 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.50" | 2400x1080 | |
79.7 % | 02/2021 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3 | 199 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.53" | 2340x1080 | |
79.3 % | 03/2021 | Samsung Galaxy A32 5G Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3 | 205 g | 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
80.2 % | 05/2021 | realme 8 5G Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2 | 185 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.50" | 2400x1080 | |
80.6 % | 05/2021 | Nokia X20 SD 480, Adreno 619 | 220 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 大量的彩色塑料而不显得廉价
小米Redmi Note 10 5G的设计很简单,大部分重音都是由塑料背壳的颜色来定,有极光绿、铬银、石墨灰和夜光蓝。正面由大猩猩3号玻璃保护,并由一个额外的保护膜覆盖。
小米智能手机的制造质量很好。缝隙尺寸既紧密又均匀,扭曲的尝试被设备拒绝。然而,显示屏周围的额外塑料框架根据其外观立即揭示了该手机的价格范围,特别是框架也被塑料包裹着。
卡槽有一个塑料盖子,颜色与边框相同,与边框齐平。混合卡槽为两张nano SIM卡或一张microSD卡而不是第二张SIM卡提供了空间。这款红米智能手机没有IP认证。
连接性 -Redmi Note 10 5G几乎拥有所有的功能
微型SD卡读卡器
名义上,支持最大尺寸为512GB的microSD卡,exFAT文件系统对Redmi Note 10 5G也不构成任何问题。然而,存储卡只能作为辅助媒体存储;智能手机不支持在其上存储应用数据或将其格式化为内部存储。
在跨平台磁盘测试中,microSD插槽的速度处于良好水平,但在我们用东芝Exceria Pro M501参考卡进行的复制测试中,Note 10 5G被证明非常慢。
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
软件 -Android 11和MIUI 12.0的小米智能手机
通信和GNSS - 良好的定位能力和5G
小米Redmi Note 10 5G可以使用目前所有的移动标准接入互联网,而且它的频率覆盖也很好。支持5G SA,但小米没有说明具体是哪个频段。这款智能手机在连接方面没有显示任何问题。
尽管该设备在移动网络方面的连接速度很快,但它最多只支持没有MIMO天线技术的Wi-Fi 5。与我们的参考路由器Netgear Nighthawk AX12的数据速率相应较低。在发送数据时,该标准实际上有一些改进的空间,但稳定的数据传输更重要。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Average of class Smartphone (16.9 - 1368, n=132, last 2 years) | |
realme 8 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T | |
Nokia X20 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Average of class Smartphone (31.1 - 953, n=133, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | |
realme 8 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T | |
Nokia X20 |
电话和通话质量
摄像机 -Redmi Note 10 5G与三摄像机设置
前置摄像头的分辨率为800万像素,它为自拍提供了很多设置。虽然包括人像模式,但所有选项在照片模式中已经可用。区别在于背景是否应该被模糊化。照片的光线很好,但自拍在默认设置下已经显得非常柔和。视频最多能以全高清(30 FPS)记录,而且有相当高的裁剪系数。
主摄像头提供4800万像素(可能是索尼IMX582传感器),并配备了电子图像稳定功能。这使得在白天也能拍出不错的照片,但它们看起来有点过度锐化,缺乏动态范围。镜头在黑暗中仍能捕捉到足够的光线,但自动对焦不再正常工作,因此许多细节变得模糊不清。如果你想放大,你必须以数字方式进行,这在2倍放大率以内工作得相当好;然而,超过这个范围,你就无法取得像样的效果。此外,还包括一个深度信息的传感器和一个微距镜头。后者的特写限制很低,大约为三厘米,而且它产生的照片锐化过度,看起来有些冲淡。我们建议使用数码变焦,因为它能提供更令人愉悦的结果。
主摄像头也只能拍摄全高清(30FPS)的视频。遗憾的是,小米没有利用传感器的潜力,至少允许4K视频。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Wide-angleWide-angleZoom (5x)Low-light
色彩再现令人愉悦,在我们的测试中,在调整后的照明条件下没有重大偏差。虽然我们的测试图在使用完整的4800万像素时并不完全清晰,甚至在图像的中心也不清晰,但其他方面的结果还是相当不错的。


附件和保修 - 盒子里有保护套和电源适配器
小米Redmi Note 10 5G配有一个22.5瓦的模块化电源适配器,一条USB线(Type-A转Type-C),一个SIM卡工具,一个硅胶保护套,一张带有安全说明的宣传单,以及一份快速启动指南。
只有12个月的保修期,不能延长,但零售商的保修,仍然不受影响。
输入设备和操作 - Note 10 5G配备侧置指纹扫描仪
显示器 - 90赫兹IPS面板,无PWM
|
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 550 cd/m²
Contrast: 1719:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.2
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.5
93.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.28
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G IPS, 2340x1080, 6.53 | Samsung Galaxy A32 5G TFT-LCD, 1600x720, 6.50 | realme 8 5G IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50 | Nokia X20 IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -53% | -81% | -63% | -85% | |
Brightness middle | 550 | 572 4% | 543 -1% | 576 5% | 646 17% |
Brightness | 515 | 540 5% | 512 -1% | 550 7% | 617 20% |
Brightness Distribution | 86 | 90 5% | 85 -1% | 91 6% | 89 3% |
Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.42 -31% | 0.63 -97% | 0.7 -119% | 0.7 -119% |
Contrast | 1719 | 1362 -21% | 862 -50% | 823 -52% | 923 -46% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 4.1 -128% | 4.9 -172% | 3.58 -99% | 5.71 -217% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.1 | 11.2 -261% | 8.6 -177% | 6.95 -124% | 8.9 -187% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.5 | 2.5 -0% | 6.3 -152% | 5.7 -128% | 6.2 -148% |
Gamma | 2.28 96% | 2.24 98% | 2.23 99% | 2.141 103% | 2.122 104% |
CCT | 6326 103% | 6525 100% | 8120 80% | 7922 82% | 8256 79% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19491 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
29.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.4 ms rise | |
↘ 14.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (22.7 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
43.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.2 ms rise | |
↘ 22.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 66 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (35.8 ms). |
性能 - 红米智能手机配备了联发科Dimensity 700
Redmi Note 10 5G的核心是一个联发科Dimensity 700,可以访问4GB的LPDDR4x内存。该SoC采用7纳米工艺制造,它可以利用两个Cortex-A76性能核心(最高2.2GHz)以及六个不太耗电的Cortex-A55核心(最高2.0GHz)。集成的ARM Mali-G57 MP2处理
图形处理。当涉及到基准测试时,小米不必要地让我们面对问题,因为有些基准测试被固件屏蔽,无法执行,这是UL的网站 ,以及其他已知的问题。除了3DMark,GFXBench和目前的AnTuTu也受到影响。到目前为止,小米还没有就这个问题发表声明。
尽管如此,我们还是能够运行一些被屏蔽的基准测试。性能与realme 8 5G ,它使用相同的SoC。在Geekbench中,realme智能手机总是快一点,但在系统基准测试中,该竞争对手确实超过了红米智能手机,这可以归因于不同的UI和额外的RAM。作为回报,Note 10 5G在AIMark中击败了其竞争对手。
总而言之,700比800U ,它被用于Redmi Note 9T 5G ,在CPU性能方面,它的定位接近于骁龙730(G),换句话说,在中端。
Geekbench 5.4 | |
Single-Core (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | |
realme 8 5G | |
Nokia X20 | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (445 - 574, n=7) | |
Average of class Smartphone (58 - 1885, n=264, last 2 years) | |
Multi-Core (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | |
realme 8 5G | |
Nokia X20 | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (1071 - 1775, n=7) | |
Average of class Smartphone (291 - 5538, n=264, last 2 years) | |
Vulkan Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | |
Nokia X20 | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (1375 - 1474, n=6) | |
Average of class Smartphone (79 - 9065, n=203, last 2 years) | |
OpenCL Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | |
realme 8 5G | |
Nokia X20 | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (1346 - 1507, n=7) | |
Average of class Smartphone (261 - 9069, n=199, last 2 years) |
Geekbench ML | |
TensorFlow Lite CPU 0.5 (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 | |
Average of class Smartphone (196 - 1043, n=15, last 2 years) | |
TensorFlow Lite GPU 0.5 (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 | |
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 2540, n=13, last 2 years) | |
TensorFlow Lite NNAPI / Core ML 0.5 (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 | |
Average of class Smartphone (127 - 3204, n=13, last 2 years) |
PCMark for Android | |
Work 3.0 (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G | |
realme 8 5G | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (6492 - 10433, n=7) | |
Average of class Smartphone (4436 - 19200, n=222, last 2 years) | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | |
realme 8 5G | |
Nokia X20 | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (6368 - 10981, n=4) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2612 - 15027, n=78, last 2 years) |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | |
realme 8 5G | |
Nokia X20 | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (51 - 65, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (9.5 - 165, n=194, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | |
realme 8 5G | |
Nokia X20 | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (55 - 65, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 462, n=194, last 2 years) |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | |
realme 8 5G | |
Nokia X20 | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (32 - 58, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (4.5 - 161, n=195, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | |
realme 8 5G | |
Nokia X20 | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (34 - 39, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2.4 - 292, n=196, last 2 years) |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | |
realme 8 5G | |
Nokia X20 | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (21 - 48, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 136, n=196, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | |
realme 8 5G | |
Nokia X20 | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (22 - 25, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.4 - 197, n=196, last 2 years) |
Antutu v9 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G | |
realme 8 5G | |
Nokia X20 | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (243323 - 356312, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (111952 - 1300282, n=163, last 2 years) |
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | |
realme 8 5G | |
Nokia X20 | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (249843 - 261067, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (94609 - 727247, n=73, last 2 years) |
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G | |
realme 8 5G | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (2642 - 2672, n=2) | |
Average of class Smartphone (734 - 9793, n=31, last 2 years) |
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | |
realme 8 5G | |
Nokia X20 | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (4108 - 12011, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1043 - 286905, n=149, last 2 years) |
在日常使用中,浏览器的性能给人留下了良好的印象。然而,更复杂的网站有时需要短暂的时间才能完全加载。在大多数基准测试中,Note 10 5G的表现与预期有一定差距。
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (14.8 - 282, n=172, last 2 years) | |
Nokia X20 (Chrome 90) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (36 - 53.6, n=5) | |
realme 8 5G (Chrome 90) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G (Chrome 88.0.4324.93) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G (Chrome 90) | |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (21.9 - 414, n=117, last 2 years) | |
Nokia X20 (Chrome 90) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G (Chrome 88.0.4324.93) | |
realme 8 5G (Chrome 90) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (69.5 - 78.4, n=4) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G (Chrome 90) | |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average of class Smartphone (12.8 - 375, n=160, last 2 years) | |
Nokia X20 (Chome 90) | |
realme 8 5G (Chome 90) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (36 - 41.7, n=5) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G (Chrome 88.0.4324.93) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G (Chrome 90) |
WebXPRT 3 - --- | |
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 292, n=171, last 2 years) | |
Nokia X20 (Chrome 90) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (50 - 65, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G (Chrome 90) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G (Chrome 88.0.4324.93) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (3905 - 74261, n=197, last 2 years) | |
realme 8 5G (Chrome 90) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G (Chrome 88.0.4324.93) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (15459 - 17380, n=5) | |
Nokia X20 (Chrome 90) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G (Chrome 90) | |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score | |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G (Chrome 90) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G (Chrome 88.0.4324.93) | |
realme 8 5G (Chrome 90) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (2260 - 3387, n=5) | |
Nokia X20 (Chrome 90) | |
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 12437, n=182, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
小米Redmi Note 10 5G中的UFS 2.2存储承诺了高传输速度。事实上,当涉及到连续写入时,这些速度实际上比竞争对手的realme 8 5G高很多。然而,与上一代机型的比较显示,我们的测试智能手机仍有改进的余地,这也适用于读写小数据块。然而,在日常使用中,这些都不明显。
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G | realme 8 5G | Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T | Nokia X20 | Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 13% | -3% | 1% | -52% | -9% | 6% | 27% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 939 | 913 -3% | 969 3% | 858 -9% | 315.8 -66% | 489.3 -48% | 710 ? -24% | 1040 ? 11% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 398 | 483.5 21% | 201 -49% | 381.7 -4% | 173.9 -56% | 462.7 16% | 493 ? 24% | 611 ? 54% |
Random Read 4KB | 151.6 | 171.1 13% | 192 27% | 174.6 15% | 90.4 -40% | 165.4 9% | 175.7 ? 16% | 190.1 ? 25% |
Random Write 4KB | 162.8 | 197 21% | 175 7% | 167.1 3% | 91.2 -44% | 144.6 -11% | 175.5 ? 8% | 194.5 ? 19% |
游戏 - 不适合高帧率游戏
与我们的合作伙伴GameBench ,我们更详细地分析了小米Redmi Note 5G的游戏性能。结果是好坏参半。一方面,像《荒野大镖客》这样的热门游戏即使在最高的细节设置下也能以60FPS的速度流畅运行,而像《死亡扳机2》这样的老游戏则最多只能以40FPS的速度运行,并有大量掉帧现象。在要求苛刻的游戏《PUBG Mobile》中,最多只能选择高清设置,然后导致相当稳定的30 FPS。
传感器工作正常,但触摸屏显示出相对较高的滑行阻力,而且当设备以横向模式持有时,单声道扬声器很快就会被阻挡。在这方面,小米智能手机肯定不是针对发烧友,而是针对休闲游戏玩家。
排放 - 经济型小米手机配备强大的单声道扬声器
温度
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
演讲者
Redmi Note
10 5G底部的单声道扬声器可以变得非常响亮,它甚至可以提供一点低音。然而,中音有点太薄,导致智能手机听起来有点弱。此外,在高音量下,高音调会失真很多,但在中等音量下,输出质量还可以。另外,也可以使用耳机插孔。然而,它的信噪比为67.84dBFS,只是刚刚令人满意,这意味着高要求在这里将无法得到满足。一个积极的方面是对蓝牙音频编解码器的广泛支持(SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX自适应、aptX TWS+、LDAC、LHDC V. 1-3)。
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%
电池寿命--从5,000毫安时的电池中榨出每一滴水来
能源消耗
Redmi Note 10 5G的功耗与它的前辈
,它需要相当多的能量,特别是在最大显示亮度下;这一方面是由于IPS技术,另一方面是由于90赫兹的刷新率。使用附带的电源适配器,5000毫安时的电池在两个多小时(121分钟)内就能充满。不支持无线充电。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A32 5G 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T 4000 mAh | Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -3% | -36% | 7% | 3% | -8% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.71 | 0.68 4% | 0.64 10% | 0.62 13% | 0.84 ? -18% | 0.888 ? -25% |
Idle Average * | 2.08 | 2.16 -4% | 1.95 6% | 1.77 15% | 1.624 ? 22% | 1.561 ? 25% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.13 | 2.2 -3% | 1.98 7% | 1.8 15% | 1.84 ? 14% | 1.773 ? 17% |
Load Average * | 3.44 | 3.63 -6% | 6.77 -97% | 3.42 1% | 3.5 ? -2% | 4.37 ? -27% |
Load Maximum * | 5.58 | 5.78 -4% | 11.42 -105% | 6.14 -10% | 5.52 ? 1% | 7.23 ? -30% |
* ... smaller is better