Notebookcheck Logo

小米Redmi Note 10 5G评论。拥有大电池的预算型5G智能手机

丰富还是多余? 通过Redmi Note 10 5G,小米推出了另一款廉价的智能手机,旨在通过一套慷慨的功能为其加分。现代化的SoC、快速存储、支持microSD、红外辐射器、大电池和音频插孔都在列表中。这是否意味着你可以用不到200欧元(约239美元)的价格就能获得幸福感?
5G Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

随着Redmi Note 9T 5G ,该型号系列的第一款支持现代移动标准的智能手机在今年年初推出。Redmi Note 10 5G与它没有什么不同,它提供了相同的存储配置以及5000毫安时的电池,以及其他东西。Note 10的显示屏略小,但它支持90赫兹。作为回报,它安装了一个稍弱的处理器和较旧的大猩猩玻璃3。

同时,Poco M3 Pro 5G在规格方面是相同的,但它的价格更低,只在设计上有区别。竞争对手通常更加昂贵,但realme 8 5GGalaxy A32 5G强有力的替代品。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G (Redmi Note Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 700 8 x 2 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G57 MP2, Core: 950 MHz
Memory
4 GB 
, LPDDR4x
Display
6.50 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 405 PPI, capacitive, 10 multitouch points, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glas 3, AdaptiveSync, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 109.3 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio jack, USB-C, Card Reader: microSD up to 512 GB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: proximity sensor, accelerometer, gyroscope, electronic compass, OTG, IR blaster
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), 4G (band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41), 5G (band 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.92 x 161.81 x 75.34
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix (1/2", f/1.79, 0.8 μm); 2 MP (macro, f/2.4); 2 MP (depth, f/2.4); Camera2 API level: Full
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.0)
Additional features
Speakers: mono, Keyboard: on-screen, 33-watt charger, USB cable, SIM tool, protective case, quick-start guide, warranty card, MIUI 12.0, 12 Months Warranty, body SAR: 0.895 W/kg, head SAR: 0.539 W/kg; DRM Widevine L1; single-band GNSS: GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, SBAS, fanless
Weight
190 g
Price
250 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
80.4 %
08/2021
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2
190 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.50"2400x1080
79.7 %
02/2021
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3
199 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.53"2340x1080
79.3 %
03/2021
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3
205 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"1600x720
80.2 %
05/2021
realme 8 5G
Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2
185 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
80.6 %
05/2021
Nokia X20
SD 480, Adreno 619
220 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080

小米Redmi Note 10 5G的设计很简单,大部分重音都是由塑料背壳的颜色来定,有极光绿、铬银、石墨灰和夜光蓝。正面由大猩猩3号玻璃保护,并由一个额外的保护膜覆盖。

小米智能手机的制造质量很好。缝隙尺寸既紧密又均匀,扭曲的尝试被设备拒绝。然而,显示屏周围的额外塑料框架根据其外观立即揭示了该手机的价格范围,特别是框架也被塑料包裹着。

卡槽有一个塑料盖子,颜色与边框相同,与边框齐平。混合卡槽为两张nano SIM卡或一张microSD卡而不是第二张SIM卡提供了空间。这款红米智能手机没有IP认证。

Size comparison

168.9 mm 79.7 mm 9.1 mm 220 g164.2 mm 76.1 mm 9.1 mm 205 g162.5 mm 74.8 mm 8.5 mm 185 g161.9 mm 77.3 mm 9.05 mm 199 g161.81 mm 75.34 mm 8.92 mm 190 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性 -Redmi Note 10 5G几乎拥有所有的功能

在Redmi Note 10 5G的连接方面,找不到真正的批评点;对于5G智能手机来说,唯一不是特别慷慨的是4GB的内存。想省点钱的用户可以选择64GB版本,价格便宜20欧元(约24美元)。

USB-C端口根据2.0标准运行,并支持OTG,这意味着外部外围设备和存储设备可以连接到智能手机上。然而,有线视频输出是不存在的。

除此之外,红米手机的蓝牙5.0、NFC、红外辐射器、模拟无线电接收器和音频插孔都相当齐全;只缺少一个通知LED。

顶部:音频,红外线,麦克风
顶部:音频,红外线,麦克风
左边:卡槽
左边:卡槽
右边。音量摇杆、电源/指纹按钮
右边。音量摇杆、电源/指纹按钮
底部。扬声器、USB、麦克风
底部。扬声器、USB、麦克风

微型SD卡读卡器

名义上,支持最大尺寸为512GB的microSD卡,exFAT文件系统对Redmi Note 10 5G也不构成任何问题。然而,存储卡只能作为辅助媒体存储;智能手机不支持在其上存储应用数据或将其格式化为内部存储。

在跨平台磁盘测试中,microSD插槽的速度处于良好水平,但在我们用东芝Exceria Pro M501参考卡进行的复制测试中,Note 10 5G被证明非常慢。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
13.4 MB/s ∼100%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø41.7 (34.2-50.7)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø84.9 (65.2-91.9)

软件 -Android 11和MIUI 12.0的小米智能手机

Android 11被用作操作系统,小米在上面运行其内部的MIUI 12.0.8,在测试时配备了2021年5月1日的安全补丁,因此是最新的。这款智能手机拥有"Android 企业推荐 "的徽章,这意味着它将在至少三年内收到Android 安全更新。然而,小米还没有提供任何有关主要更新和更新频率的信息。

因此,该UI在使用资源方面非常严格。没有为应用程序设置例外的用户将很快不得不面对它们在后台被限制的问题。除了自己的应用程序,小米还预装了几个第三方应用程序,但所有这些都可以由用户卸载。

通信和GNSS - 良好的定位能力和5G

小米Redmi Note 10 5G可以使用目前所有的移动标准接入互联网,而且它的频率覆盖也很好。支持5G SA,但小米没有说明具体是哪个频段。这款智能手机在连接方面没有显示任何问题。

尽管该设备在移动网络方面的连接速度很快,但它最多只支持没有MIMO天线技术的Wi-Fi 5。与我们的参考路由器Netgear Nighthawk AX12的数据速率相应较低。在发送数据时,该标准实际上有一些改进的空间,但稳定的数据传输更重要。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Average of class Smartphone
  (16.9 - 1368, n=132, last 2 years)
507 MBit/s ∼100% +72%
realme 8 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
347 (332min - 353max) MBit/s ∼68% +18%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
346 (324min - 360max) MBit/s ∼68% +18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 800U, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
336 (271min - 355max) MBit/s ∼66% +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
294 (286min - 301max) MBit/s ∼58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
278 (218min - 305max) MBit/s ∼55% -5%
Nokia X20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
222 (126min - 326max) MBit/s ∼44% -24%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Smartphone
  (31.1 - 953, n=133, last 2 years)
479 MBit/s ∼100% +37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 800U, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
366 (336min - 379max) MBit/s ∼76% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
366 (347min - 374max) MBit/s ∼76% +5%
realme 8 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
362 (335min - 367max) MBit/s ∼76% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
350 (332min - 359max) MBit/s ∼73%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
315 (157min - 352max) MBit/s ∼66% -10%
Nokia X20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
313 (190min - 343max) MBit/s ∼65% -11%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø350 (332-359)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø294 (286-301)
GPS测试。支持的GNSS
全球导航卫星系统
GPS测试。室外
户外活动
GPS测试:室内
在室内

红米智能手机可以与GPS、GLONASS、BeiDou、Galileo和SBAS支持系统的卫星网络(都是单频)进行通信。卫星信号在户外获得的速度非常快,而且也非常精确,精度达到一米。

Note 10 5G必须面对与Garmin Edge 500在短程自行车上的比较。虽然它确实有缺陷,但它通常比自行车电脑更能确定位置。

GNSS试骑--湖
GNSS试骑--湖
GNSS试骑 - 转折点
GNSS试骑 - 转折点
GNSS试骑--总结
GNSS试骑--总结

电话和通话质量

Redmi Note

10 5G有一个混合SIM卡插槽,因此它既可以在双SIM卡模式下使用,也可以使用单SIM卡和一个microSD卡。在德国不支持eSIM,也不支持Wi-Fi通话或SIP账户。不过,VoLTE已经上马。

通话特性很好。当设备放在耳边时,用户可以很好地理解。声音在扬声器上有明显的回响,但麦克风的范围很好,所以说话的用户不需要保持在附近。

小米手机在降噪方面的表现只能算一般。轻微的噪音被过滤掉了,但如果你坐在离空调机很近的地方,例如,你将不得不忍受它在通话中被听到。强烈的背景噪音总是可以听到的,在这种情况下,用户的声音被传输是可以理解的,但它听起来非常闷。

摄像机 -Redmi Note 10 5G与三摄像机设置

用Redmi Note 10 5G拍摄的自拍。
用Redmi Note 10 5G拍摄的自拍。

前置摄像头的分辨率为800万像素,它为自拍提供了很多设置。虽然包括人像模式,但所有选项在照片模式中已经可用。区别在于背景是否应该被模糊化。照片的光线很好,但自拍在默认设置下已经显得非常柔和。视频最多能以全高清(30 FPS)记录,而且有相当高的裁剪系数。

主摄像头提供4800万像素(可能是索尼IMX582传感器),并配备了电子图像稳定功能。这使得在白天也能拍出不错的照片,但它们看起来有点过度锐化,缺乏动态范围。镜头在黑暗中仍能捕捉到足够的光线,但自动对焦不再正常工作,因此许多细节变得模糊不清。如果你想放大,你必须以数字方式进行,这在2倍放大率以内工作得相当好;然而,超过这个范围,你就无法取得像样的效果。此外,还包括一个深度信息的传感器和一个微距镜头。后者的特写限制很低,大约为三厘米,而且它产生的照片锐化过度,看起来有些冲淡。我们建议使用数码变焦,因为它能提供更令人愉悦的结果。

主摄像头也只能拍摄全高清(30FPS)的视频。遗憾的是,小米没有利用传感器的潜力,至少允许4K视频。

用微距镜头拍摄的照片
用微距镜头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片(2倍放大)。
用主摄像头拍摄的照片(2倍放大)。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide-angleWide-angleZoom (5x)Low-light

色彩再现令人愉悦,在我们的测试中,在调整后的照明条件下没有重大偏差。虽然我们的测试图在使用完整的4800万像素时并不完全清晰,甚至在图像的中心也不清晰,但其他方面的结果还是相当不错的。

ColorChecker
4.9 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
3 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
9 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G: 5.15 ∆E min: 1.95 - max: 9.02 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.3 ∆E
47.8 ∆E
37.6 ∆E
33.6 ∆E
42.9 ∆E
55.5 ∆E
46.8 ∆E
32.9 ∆E
35.4 ∆E
28 ∆E
58.7 ∆E
58.9 ∆E
27.9 ∆E
43.7 ∆E
31.6 ∆E
68.7 ∆E
39.4 ∆E
40.2 ∆E
65 ∆E
65.3 ∆E
49.1 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G: 42.09 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 68.68 ∆E

附件和保修 - 盒子里有保护套和电源适配器

小米Redmi Note 10 5G配有一个22.5瓦的模块化电源适配器,一条USB线(Type-A转Type-C),一个SIM卡工具,一个硅胶保护套,一张带有安全说明的宣传单,以及一份快速启动指南。

只有12个月的保修期,不能延长,但零售商的保修,仍然不受影响。

输入设备和操作 - Note 10 5G配备侧置指纹扫描仪

Redmi Note

10 5G的电容式触摸屏具有良好的滑行性能,对输入的反应相当迅速和可靠。然而,预涂的保护膜具有较高的滑行阻力,而且也会很快出现污点。此外,谷歌的GBoard被设置为键盘布局,但它可以被Play Store中的任何其他应用程序取代。

如果需要的话,可定制的振动马达可以相当强劲,但感觉有点松软。至少它是令人愉快的安静。指纹扫描仪集成在电源按钮上;只要手指不是太潮湿,它就能可靠地识别存储的指纹,并以令人愉悦的速度解锁智能手机。另外,也可以使用前置摄像头配置二维面部识别,这是一个更快但不太安全的解决方案。

显示器 - 90赫兹IPS面板,无PWM

子像素结构
子像素结构

小米Redmi Note 10 5G中的6.5英寸(16.51厘米)IPS显示屏的分辨率为2400x1080像素,提供了高图像清晰度。刷新率默认设置为60赫兹,但也可以在设置中增加到90赫兹。系统可以在90和30赫兹之间自适应地调整刷新率。

激活环境光传感器后,该面板实现了良好的亮度,在APL50测量中保持恒定。选择禁用自动调节的用户将有最大440cd/m²的亮度供其使用。

使用黑色背景,测得的0.32cd/m²的黑度是很好的,确保了清晰的对比。在亮区和暗区均匀分布的情况下,黑度增加到0.46cd/m²,使对比度降低到1,196:1。

535
cd/m²
540
cd/m²
492
cd/m²
526
cd/m²
550
cd/m²
485
cd/m²
522
cd/m²
513
cd/m²
474
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 550 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 515.2 cd/m² Minimum: 1.45 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 550 cd/m²
Contrast: 1719:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.2
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.5
93.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.28
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.53
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
TFT-LCD, 1600x720, 6.50
realme 8 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50
Nokia X20
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Screen
-53%
-81%
-63%
-85%
Brightness middle
550
572
4%
543
-1%
576
5%
646
17%
Brightness
515
540
5%
512
-1%
550
7%
617
20%
Brightness Distribution
86
90
5%
85
-1%
91
6%
89
3%
Black Level *
0.32
0.42
-31%
0.63
-97%
0.7
-119%
0.7
-119%
Contrast
1719
1362
-21%
862
-50%
823
-52%
923
-46%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.8
4.1
-128%
4.9
-172%
3.58
-99%
5.71
-217%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.1
11.2
-261%
8.6
-177%
6.95
-124%
8.9
-187%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.5
2.5
-0%
6.3
-152%
5.7
-128%
6.2
-148%
Gamma
2.28 96%
2.24 98%
2.23 99%
2.141 103%
2.122 104%
CCT
6326 103%
6525 100%
8120 80%
7922 82%
8256 79%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19491 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

我们使用CalMAN软件检查显示质量。当使用 "标准 "色彩方案时,可获得最精确的色彩结果。默认情况下是一种自动模式,使颜色适应环境光线,并提供一个更冷的图像。

灰度(配置文件:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB
灰度(配置文件:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB
混合颜色(配置文件:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB
混合颜色(配置文件:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB
色彩空间(配置文件:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB
色彩空间(配置文件:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB
饱和度(配置文件:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB
饱和度(配置文件:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
29.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14.4 ms rise
↘ 14.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (22.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
43.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21.2 ms rise
↘ 22.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 66 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (35.8 ms).

在阳光明媚的日子里,很快就会发现,小米Redmi Note 10 5G可以使用更多的亮度。显示器在阳光下看起来非常暗淡,除此之外,它还会反光。另一方面,在阴凉处也没有问题。

阴天时的室外
阴天时的室外
在阴凉处
在阴凉处

Redmi Note 10 5G的视角稳定性在日常使用中很好;只有平坦的视角会导致亮度下降。我们无法检测到IPS面板的颜色反转或发光效果,在我们的审查样本中也没有注意到任何屏幕出血。

小米Redmi Note 10 5G的视角稳定性
小米Redmi Note 10 5G的视角稳定性

性能 - 红米智能手机配备了联发科Dimensity 700

Redmi Note 10 5G的核心一个联发科Dimensity 700,可以访问4GB的LPDDR4x内存。该SoC采用7纳米工艺制造,它可以利用两个Cortex-A76性能核心(最高2.2GHz)以及六个不太耗电的Cortex-A55核心(最高2.0GHz)。集成的ARM Mali-G57 MP2处理

图形处理。

当涉及到基准测试时,小米不必要地让我们面对问题,因为有些基准测试被固件屏蔽,无法执行,这是UL的网站 ,以及其他已知的问题。除了3DMark,GFXBench和目前的AnTuTu也受到影响。到目前为止,小米还没有就这个问题发表声明。

尽管如此,我们还是能够运行一些被屏蔽的基准测试。性能与realme 8 5G ,它使用相同的SoC。在Geekbench中,realme智能手机总是快一点,但在系统基准测试中,该竞争对手确实超过了红米智能手机,这可以归因于不同的UI和额外的RAM。作为回报,Note 10 5G在AIMark中击败了其竞争对手。

总而言之,700比800U ,它被用于Redmi Note 9T 5G ,在CPU性能方面,它的定位接近于骁龙730(G),换句话说,在中端。

Geekbench 5.4
Single-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
547 Points ∼72%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
600 Points ∼79% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
472 Points ∼62% -14%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
574 Points ∼76% +5%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
510 Points ∼67% -7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (445 - 574, n=7)
530 Points ∼70% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1885, n=264, last 2 years)
759 Points ∼100% +39%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1692 Points ∼69%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1781 Points ∼73% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1511 Points ∼62% -11%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1775 Points ∼73% +5%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
1663 Points ∼68% -2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (1071 - 1775, n=7)
1582 Points ∼65% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (291 - 5538, n=264, last 2 years)
2445 Points ∼100% +45%
Vulkan Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1375 Points ∼44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1459 Points ∼47% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1418 Points ∼45% +3%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
995 Points ∼32% -28%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (1375 - 1474, n=6)
1407 Points ∼45% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (79 - 9065, n=203, last 2 years)
3119 Points ∼100% +127%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1402 Points ∼49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1935 Points ∼67% +38%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1525 Points ∼53% +9%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1507 Points ∼52% +7%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
1082 Points ∼38% -23%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (1346 - 1507, n=7)
1423 Points ∼49% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (261 - 9069, n=199, last 2 years)
2880 Points ∼100% +105%
Geekbench ML
TensorFlow Lite CPU 0.5 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
196 Points ∼38%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
 
196 Points ∼38% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 1043, n=15, last 2 years)
515 Points ∼100% +163%
TensorFlow Lite GPU 0.5 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
388 Points ∼24%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
 
388 Points ∼24% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (388 - 2540, n=13, last 2 years)
1626 Points ∼100% +319%
TensorFlow Lite NNAPI / Core ML 0.5 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
127 Points ∼9%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
 
127 Points ∼9% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (127 - 3204, n=13, last 2 years)
1377 Points ∼100% +984%
PCMark for Android
Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
8965 Points ∼86%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
10433 Points ∼100% +16%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (6492 - 10433, n=7)
8024 Points ∼77% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 19200, n=222, last 2 years)
10342 Points ∼99% +15%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
8504 Points ∼77%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
8738 Points ∼80% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
6145 Points ∼56% -28%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
10981 Points ∼100% +29%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
6380 Points ∼58% -25%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (6368 - 10981, n=4)
8541 Points ∼78% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2612 - 15027, n=78, last 2 years)
8981 Points ∼82% +6%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3396 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3499 Points ∼100% +3%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3340 Points ∼95% -2%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3461 Points ∼99% +2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (3149 - 3449, n=6)
3352 Points ∼96% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 9221, n=128, last 2 years)
3028 Points ∼87% -11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3501 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3805 Points ∼100% +9%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3463 Points ∼91% -1%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3647 Points ∼96% +4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (3319 - 3501, n=6)
3426 Points ∼90% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 13263, n=128, last 2 years)
3269 Points ∼86% -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3073 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2730 Points ∼87% -11%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2971 Points ∼95% -3%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2938 Points ∼94% -4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2669 - 3535, n=6)
3138 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (677 - 4609, n=128, last 2 years)
2766 Points ∼88% -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3553 Points ∼62%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3713 Points ∼64% +5%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3544 Points ∼61% 0%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3639 Points ∼63% +2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (3277 - 3580, n=6)
3506 Points ∼61% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 18846, n=196, last 2 years)
5772 Points ∼100% +62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3664 Points ∼42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3975 Points ∼46% +8%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3637 Points ∼42% -1%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3842 Points ∼44% +5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (3435 - 3664, n=6)
3601 Points ∼41% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 36343, n=195, last 2 years)
8728 Points ∼100% +138%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3214 Points ∼94%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3018 Points ∼88% -6%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3251 Points ∼95% +1%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3070 Points ∼89% -4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2824 - 3393, n=6)
3215 Points ∼94% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (651 - 7019, n=194, last 2 years)
3437 Points ∼100% +7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2453 Points ∼95%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2575 Points ∼100% +5%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2343 Points ∼91% -4%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2419 Points ∼94% -1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2343 - 2453, n=7)
2395 Points ∼93% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 7890, n=150, last 2 years)
2273 Points ∼88% -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2302 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2525 Points ∼100% +10%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2206 Points ∼87% -4%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2289 Points ∼91% -1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2206 - 2313, n=7)
2255 Points ∼89% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 9814, n=150, last 2 years)
2254 Points ∼89% -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3184 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2765 Points ∼87% -13%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2991 Points ∼94% -6%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3017 Points ∼95% -5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2829 - 3508, n=7)
3077 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (688 - 4679, n=150, last 2 years)
2824 Points ∼89% -11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2497 Points ∼54%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2659 Points ∼58% +6%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2453 Points ∼53% -2%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2536 Points ∼55% +2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2434 - 2497, n=7)
2464 Points ∼53% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 16067, n=227, last 2 years)
4613 Points ∼100% +85%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2327 Points ∼38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2597 Points ∼42% +12%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2295 Points ∼37% -1%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2440 Points ∼40% +5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2281 - 2336, n=7)
2310 Points ∼38% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 25350, n=226, last 2 years)
6139 Points ∼100% +164%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3355 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2901 Points ∼85% -14%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3234 Points ∼95% -4%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2941 Points ∼87% -12%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2948 - 3355, n=7)
3224 Points ∼95% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (635 - 7042, n=226, last 2 years)
3400 Points ∼100% +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2219 Points ∼89%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2501 Points ∼100% +13%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2224 Points ∼89% 0%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2267 Points ∼91% +2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2188 - 2387, n=7)
2259 Points ∼90% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (365 - 6439, n=138, last 2 years)
2211 Points ∼88% 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2133 Points ∼87%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2461 Points ∼100% +15%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2138 Points ∼87% 0%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2186 Points ∼89% +2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2133 - 2330, n=7)
2165 Points ∼88% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 8601, n=138, last 2 years)
2276 Points ∼92% +7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2582 Points ∼96%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2651 Points ∼99% +3%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2586 Points ∼96% 0%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2606 Points ∼97% +1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2391 - 2956, n=7)
2683 Points ∼100% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1567 - 3525, n=138, last 2 years)
2561 Points ∼95% -1%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1245 Points ∼39%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1103 Points ∼35%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
980 Points ∼31%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (1094 - 1203, n=5)
1121 Points ∼35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (254 - 10062, n=201, last 2 years)
3160 Points ∼100%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1215 Points ∼29%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1078 Points ∼26%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
974 Points ∼23%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (1074 - 11161, n=5)
3094 Points ∼74%
Average of class Smartphone
  (247 - 14002, n=224, last 2 years)
4181 Points ∼100%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
53 fps ∼69%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
58 fps ∼75% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
60 fps ∼78% +13%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
57 fps ∼74% +8%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
59 fps ∼77% +11%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (51 - 65, n=5)
55.6 fps ∼72% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.5 - 165, n=194, last 2 years)
77 fps ∼100% +45%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
59 fps ∼33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
79 fps ∼45% +34%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
68 fps ∼39% +15%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
63 fps ∼36% +7%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
81 fps ∼46% +37%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (55 - 65, n=5)
60.6 fps ∼34% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 462, n=194, last 2 years)
176.3 fps ∼100% +199%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
33 fps ∼51%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
47 fps ∼73% +42%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
54 fps ∼84% +64%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
35 fps ∼54% +6%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
26 fps ∼40% -21%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (32 - 58, n=5)
38.2 fps ∼59% +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 161, n=195, last 2 years)
64.3 fps ∼100% +95%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
37 fps ∼37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
44 fps ∼44% +19%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
41 fps ∼41% +11%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
38 fps ∼38% +3%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
41 fps ∼41% +11%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (34 - 39, n=5)
37 fps ∼37% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.4 - 292, n=196, last 2 years)
99.7 fps ∼100% +169%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
23 fps ∼45%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
31 fps ∼61% +35%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
51 fps ∼100% +122%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
22 fps ∼43% -4%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
26 fps ∼51% +13%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (21 - 48, n=5)
27 fps ∼53% +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 136, n=196, last 2 years)
50.7 fps ∼99% +120%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
24 fps ∼35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
33 fps ∼49% +38%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
26 fps ∼38% +8%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
25 fps ∼37% +4%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
29 fps ∼43% +21%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (22 - 25, n=5)
24 fps ∼35% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 197, n=196, last 2 years)
67.7 fps ∼100% +182%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
11 fps ∼33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
16 fps ∼48% +45%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
23 fps ∼69% +109%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
13 fps ∼39% +18%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
14 fps ∼42% +27%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (11 - 25, n=5)
14.4 fps ∼43% +31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 93, n=195, last 2 years)
33.3 fps ∼100% +203%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
10 fps ∼24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
17 fps ∼41% +70%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
13 fps ∼32% +30%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
15 fps ∼37% +50%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
16 fps ∼39% +60%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (10 - 15, n=5)
13.4 fps ∼33% +34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.9 - 114, n=195, last 2 years)
41 fps ∼100% +310%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
14 fps ∼41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
19 fps ∼56% +36%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
30 fps ∼88% +114%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
14 fps ∼41% 0%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
16 fps ∼47% +14%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (13 - 28, n=7)
15.6 fps ∼46% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 113, n=260, last 2 years)
34 fps ∼100% +143%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
15 fps ∼36%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
21 fps ∼50% +40%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
17 fps ∼40% +13%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
15 fps ∼36% 0%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
18 fps ∼43% +20%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (14 - 16, n=7)
15 fps ∼36% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.9 - 142, n=261, last 2 years)
42.1 fps ∼100% +181%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
8.9 fps ∼37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
12 fps ∼50% +35%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
17 fps ∼71% +91%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
8.7 fps ∼36% -2%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
9.9 fps ∼41% +11%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (8.1 - 17, n=7)
9.71 fps ∼40% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.8 - 86, n=261, last 2 years)
24 fps ∼100% +170%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
5.5 fps ∼34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
7.3 fps ∼45% +33%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
6.2 fps ∼39% +13%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
5.6 fps ∼35% +2%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
6.5 fps ∼40% +18%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (5.5 - 5.6, n=7)
5.54 fps ∼34% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.7 - 56, n=261, last 2 years)
16.1 fps ∼100% +193%
Antutu v9 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
Points ∼0%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
356312 Points ∼60%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
325785 Points ∼55%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (243323 - 356312, n=3)
295714 Points ∼50%
Average of class Smartphone
  (111952 - 1300282, n=163, last 2 years)
596789 Points ∼100%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
260248 Points ∼70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
252308 Points ∼68% -3%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
261067 Points ∼70% 0%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
262987 Points ∼71% +1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (249843 - 261067, n=3)
257053 Points ∼69% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94609 - 727247, n=73, last 2 years)
372613 Points ∼100% +43%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2642 Score ∼69%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3228 Score ∼85% +22%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2672 Score ∼70% +1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2642 - 2672, n=2)
2657 Score ∼70% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (734 - 9793, n=31, last 2 years)
3803 Score ∼100% +44%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
11953 Points ∼23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
13661 Points ∼26% +14%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
12331 Points ∼24% +3%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
5225 Points ∼10% -56%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
4722 Points ∼9% -60%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (4108 - 12011, n=5)
8418 Points ∼16% -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1043 - 286905, n=149, last 2 years)
52384 Points ∼100% +338%
Basemark GPU 1.2
1280x720 OpenGL Simple Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
220.8 fps ∼88%
Average of class Smartphone
  (38.8 - 511, n=11, last 2 years)
252 fps ∼100%
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
29.4 (7.53min - 41.97max) fps ∼39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
36.87 fps ∼49% +25%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
29.53 fps ∼39% 0%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
25.67 fps ∼34% -13%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (29.4 - 29.5, n=2)
29.5 fps ∼39% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.65 - 1203, n=51, last 2 years)
75.4 fps ∼100% +156%
OpenGL Medium Native (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
25.54 (6.94min - 70.2max) fps ∼30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
32.73 fps ∼39% +28%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
26 fps ∼31% +2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (25.5 - 26, n=2)
25.8 fps ∼31% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (11.3 - 1905, n=50, last 2 years)
84.4 fps ∼100% +230%
1280x720 Vulkan Simple Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
175.1 (90.44min - 986.27max) fps ∼24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
203.3 fps ∼27% +16%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
141.5 fps ∼19% -19%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
209.9 fps ∼28% +20%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (141.5 - 175.1, n=2)
158.3 fps ∼21% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.12 - 15608, n=49, last 2 years)
743 fps ∼100% +324%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
27.21 (10.31min - 49.2max) fps ∼22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
33.05 fps ∼27% +21%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
27.66 fps ∼22% +2%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
26.76 fps ∼22% -2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (27.2 - 27.7, n=2)
27.4 fps ∼22% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.51 - 2418, n=50, last 2 years)
123.8 fps ∼100% +355%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
23.75 (9.07min - 42.27max) fps ∼29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
29.72 fps ∼36% +25%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
24.27 fps ∼29% +2%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
23.46 fps ∼28% -1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (23.8 - 24.3, n=2)
24 fps ∼29% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (11.2 - 1709, n=49, last 2 years)
82.8 fps ∼100% +249%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3047 Points ∼64%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3379 Points ∼71% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2735 Points ∼57% -10%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3011 Points ∼63% -1%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3260 Points ∼68% +7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2794 - 3107, n=5)
2993 Points ∼63% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 9555, n=175, last 2 years)
4783 Points ∼100% +57%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
5760 Points ∼69%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
6380 Points ∼76% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
4995 Points ∼59% -13%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
6712 Points ∼80% +17%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
6308 Points ∼75% +10%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (4917 - 6712, n=5)
6005 Points ∼72% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2083 - 19657, n=175, last 2 years)
8396 Points ∼100% +46%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
4212 Points ∼79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
4838 Points ∼90% +15%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3281 Points ∼61% -22%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
4428 Points ∼83% +5%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3484 Points ∼65% -17%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (3824 - 4473, n=5)
4240 Points ∼79% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 11617, n=175, last 2 years)
5357 Points ∼100% +27%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2675 Points ∼28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3205 Points ∼34% +20%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2687 Points ∼28% 0%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2401 Points ∼25% -10%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3780 Points ∼40% +41%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2398 - 2675, n=5)
2527 Points ∼27% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 27384, n=175, last 2 years)
9454 Points ∼100% +253%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1328 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1318 Points ∼92% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1271 Points ∼89% -4%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1152 Points ∼81% -13%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
1360 Points ∼95% +2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (1152 - 1353, n=5)
1257 Points ∼88% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2392, n=175, last 2 years)
1427 Points ∼100% +7%

在日常使用中,浏览器的性能给人留下了良好的印象。然而,更复杂的网站有时需要短暂的时间才能完全加载。在大多数基准测试中,Note 10 5G的表现与预期有一定差距。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (14.8 - 282, n=172, last 2 years)
76.4 Points ∼100% +107%
Nokia X20 (Chrome 90)
49.39 Points ∼65% +34%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (36 - 53.6, n=5)
41 Points ∼54% +11%
realme 8 5G (Chrome 90)
40.45 Points ∼53% +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G (Chrome 88.0.4324.93)
39.54 Points ∼52% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G (Chrome 90)
36.98 Points ∼48%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88)
36.3 Points ∼48% -2%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (21.9 - 414, n=117, last 2 years)
123.2 Points ∼100% +72%
Nokia X20 (Chrome 90)
84.3 Points ∼68% +18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G (Chrome 88.0.4324.93)
79 Points ∼64% +10%
realme 8 5G (Chrome 90)
77.9 Points ∼63% +9%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (69.5 - 78.4, n=4)
74.4 Points ∼60% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G (Chrome 90)
71.7 Points ∼58%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88)
67.3 Points ∼55% -6%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (12.8 - 375, n=160, last 2 years)
72.6 runs/min ∼100% +97%
Nokia X20 (Chome 90)
38.7 runs/min ∼53% +5%
realme 8 5G (Chome 90)
38.3 runs/min ∼53% +4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (36 - 41.7, n=5)
38 runs/min ∼52% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G (Chrome 88.0.4324.93)
37.8 runs/min ∼52% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G (Chrome 90)
36.8 runs/min ∼51%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 292, n=171, last 2 years)
104.1 Points ∼100% +108%
Nokia X20 (Chrome 90)
70 Points ∼67% +40%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (50 - 65, n=4)
56.8 Points ∼55% +14%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88)
51 Points ∼49% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G (Chrome 90)
50 Points ∼48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G (Chrome 88.0.4324.93)
47 Points ∼45% -6%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (3905 - 74261, n=197, last 2 years)
27455 Points ∼100% +78%
realme 8 5G (Chrome 90)
17380 Points ∼63% +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G (Chrome 88.0.4324.93)
16629 Points ∼61% +8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (15459 - 17380, n=5)
16511 Points ∼60% +7%
Nokia X20 (Chrome 90)
15958 Points ∼58% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G (Chrome 90)
15459 Points ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88)
14156 Points ∼52% -8%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88)
3467 ms * ∼100% -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G (Chrome 90)
3328 ms * ∼96%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G (Chrome 88.0.4324.93)
3298 ms * ∼95% +1%
realme 8 5G (Chrome 90)
3145 ms * ∼91% +5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (2260 - 3387, n=5)
2933 ms * ∼85% +12%
Nokia X20 (Chrome 90)
2749 ms * ∼79% +17%
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 12437, n=182, last 2 years)
2419 ms * ∼70% +27%

* ... smaller is better

小米Redmi Note 10 5G中的UFS 2.2存储承诺了高传输速度。事实上,涉及到连续写入时,这些速度实际上比竞争对手的realme 8 5G高很多。然而,与上一代机型的比较显示,我们的测试智能手机仍有改进的余地,这也适用于读写小数据块。然而,在日常使用中,这些都不明显。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5Grealme 8 5GSamsung Galaxy A32 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 8TNokia X20Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
13%
-3%
1%
-52%
-9%
6%
27%
Sequential Read 256KB
939
913
-3%
969
3%
858
-9%
315.8
-66%
489.3
-48%
710 ?(303 - 999, n=37)
-24%
1040 ?(90.5 - 3557, n=256, last 2 years)
11%
Sequential Write 256KB
398
483.5
21%
201
-49%
381.7
-4%
173.9
-56%
462.7
16%
493 ?(105.3 - 884, n=37)
24%
611 ?(11.9 - 2723, n=256, last 2 years)
54%
Random Read 4KB
151.6
171.1
13%
192
27%
174.6
15%
90.4
-40%
165.4
9%
175.7 ?(89.3 - 253, n=37)
16%
190.1 ?(13.5 - 543, n=256, last 2 years)
25%
Random Write 4KB
162.8
197
21%
175
7%
167.1
3%
91.2
-44%
144.6
-11%
175.5 ?(113.8 - 258, n=37)
8%
194.5 ?(13 - 552, n=257, last 2 years)
19%

游戏 - 不适合高帧率游戏

与我们的合作伙伴GameBench ,我们更详细地分析了小米Redmi Note 5G的游戏性能。结果是好坏参半。一方面,像《荒野大镖客》这样的热门游戏即使在最高的细节设置下也能以60FPS的速度流畅运行,而像《死亡扳机2》这样的老游戏则最多只能以40FPS的速度运行,并有大量掉帧现象。在要求苛刻的游戏《PUBG Mobile》中,最多只能选择高清设置,然后导致相当稳定的30 FPS。

传感器工作正常,但触摸屏显示出相对较高的滑行阻力,而且当设备以横向模式持有时,单声道扬声器很快就会被阻挡。在这方面,小米智能手机肯定不是针对发烧友,而是针对休闲游戏玩家。

死亡扳机2
死亡扳机2
PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
英雄联盟。野生裂缝
英雄联盟。野生裂缝
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G; Dead Trigger 2; 1.7.9: Ø37.9 (30-42)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G; League of Legends: Wild Rift; 2.3.0.4342: Ø60.1 (55-61)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 1.4.0: Ø39.9 (37-42)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G; PUBG Mobile; Balanced; 1.4.0: Ø39.9 (37-42)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G; PUBG Mobile; HD; 1.4.0: Ø30 (29-31)

排放 - 经济型小米手机配备强大的单声道扬声器

温度

GFXBench电池测试。T-Rex (OpenGL ES 2.0)
T-Rex
GFXBench电池测试。曼哈顿(OpenGL ES 3.1
曼哈顿

小米Redmi Note 10 5G的表面温度在空闲使用时已经很高,它们大多在30℃(约86°F)左右波动。在长时间的负载下,它们甚至更高,在某些地方几乎达到40℃(约104°F)。虽然这是非常热的,但这绝不是一个令人担忧的原因。

我们用GFXBench的电池测试检查了SoC的性能稳定性。两种情况都显示了恒定的性能,但至少在更容易的T-Rex测试中,它比预期要低。

Max. Load
 36.9 °C36.7 °C39.5 °C 
 36.7 °C36.6 °C37.5 °C 
 35.3 °C34.7 °C36.3 °C 
Maximum: 39.5 °C
Average: 36.7 °C
33.8 °C35.8 °C36.8 °C
33.4 °C36 °C36.6 °C
32.5 °C34 °C34.4 °C
Maximum: 36.8 °C
Average: 34.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  27.6 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.7 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

演讲者

Redmi Note

10 5G底部的单声道扬声器可以变得非常响亮,它甚至可以提供一点低音。然而,中音有点太薄,导致智能手机听起来有点弱。此外,在高音量下,高音调会失真很多,但在中等音量下,输出质量还可以。

另外,也可以使用耳机插孔。然而,它的信噪比为67.84dBFS,只是刚刚令人满意,这意味着高要求在这里将无法得到满足。一个积极的方面是对蓝牙音频编解码器的广泛支持(SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX自适应、aptX TWS+、LDAC、LHDC V. 1-3)。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203036.62526.739.33125.638.54026.139.65036.442.36329.245.580254610017.84512518.34616018.646.620017.451.225014.253.631515.957.540012.860.75001465.163013.368.580012.275.7100012.379.9125011.982160012.881.3200012.782.5250012.183.8315012.981.7400013.276.4500013.477.3630013.677.1800013.478.91000013.981.3125001482.41600014.270SPL25.292.3N0.789.7median 13.4median 76.4Delta1.211.335.944.92942.825.144.231.445.142.446.132.448.52647.821.547.41549.121.350.914.453.81457.513.559.511.964.312.265.512.666.513.471.712.275.712.37812.779.913.580.9138312.885.113.782.313.583.613.881.714.783.313.680.214.2731571.125.793.20.795median 13.5median 73110.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Note 10 5GSamsung Galaxy A32 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命--从5,000毫安时的电池中榨出每一滴水来

能源消耗

Redmi Note 10 5G的功耗与它的前辈

,它需要相当多的能量,特别是在最大显示亮度下;这一方面是由于IPS技术,另一方面是由于90赫兹的刷新率。

使用附带的电源适配器,5000毫安时的电池在两个多小时(121分钟)内就能充满。不支持无线充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.21 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.71 / 2.08 / 2.13 Watt
Load midlight 3.44 / 5.58 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
4000 mAh
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-3%
-36%
7%
3%
-8%
Idle Minimum *
0.71
0.68
4%
0.64
10%
0.62
13%
0.84 ?(0.69 - 1, n=5)
-18%
0.888 ?(0.12 - 2.5, n=187, last 2 years)
-25%
Idle Average *
2.08
2.16
-4%
1.95
6%
1.77
15%
1.624 ?(1.1 - 2.08, n=5)
22%
1.561 ?(0.65 - 3.6, n=187, last 2 years)
25%
Idle Maximum *
2.13
2.2
-3%
1.98
7%
1.8
15%
1.84 ?(1.2 - 2.13, n=5)
14%
1.773 ?(0.69 - 3.7, n=187, last 2 years)
17%
Load Average *
3.44
3.63
-6%
6.77
-97%
3.42
1%
3.5 ?(3.27 - 3.8, n=5)
-2%
4.37 ?(2.1 - 7.74, n=187, last 2 years)
-27%
Load Maximum *
5.58
5.78
-4%
11.42
-105%
6.14
-10%
5.52 ?(5.3 - 5.8, n=5)
1%
7.23 ?(3.56 - 11.9, n=187, last 2 years)
-30%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption with Geekbench, GFXBench, and in idle usage (150 cd/m²)