Notebookcheck Logo

三星Galaxy A12 Exynos评论。新的SoC是否使其成为更好的智能手机?

电池冠军的新版本。 Galaxy A12 Nacho在我们的审查中显示出良好的功能,但也有一些弱点。与Galaxy A12一样,这款三星手机的定价也非常有吸引力。阅读我们的评论,了解这款入门级的智能手机是否值得购买。
Touchscreen Smartphone Android
三星Galaxy A12 Exynos智能手机评论

这家韩国制造商为其受欢迎的A系列增加了另一款入门级机型。然而,这款型号为SM-A127F的三星手机并不完全是新的,因为它与它的Galaxy A12(SM-A125F)的兄弟姐妹。尽管三星没有正式改变命名方案,但我们将用代号 "Nacho "或 "Exynos "来扩展 "较新 "的Galaxy A12的名称,以避免混淆。毕竟,唯一值得注意的区别可以在SoC的选择上找到。与A12机型不同,它配备了联发科的 Helio P35,2021年的变体现在是基于内部的 Exynos 850芯片组.

我们无法确定Galaxy A12 Exynos的建议零售价,但这款入门级智能手机在市场推出后的街头价格与2020年的机型差不多(约170欧元(约192美元))。作为回报,这款6.5英寸的三星智能手机的买家可以得到一个带有水滴缺口的HD+显示屏,一个5000毫安时的电池,以及一个带有4800万像素主摄像头的四摄设置。

Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F (Galaxy A Series)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 850 8 x - 2 GHz, Cortex-A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G52 MP1
Memory
4096 MB 
Display
6.50 inch 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixel 270 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS LCD, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 51 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD (up to 1TB), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, proximity sensor, OTG, Miracast
Networking
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G: GSM850, GSM900, DCS1800, PCS1900; 3G: B1(2100), B5(850), B8(900); 4G FDD: B1(2100), B3(1800), B5(850), B7(2600), B8(900), B20(800), B28(700); TDD: B38(2600), B40(2300), B41(2500), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.9 x 164 x 75.8
Battery
5000 mAh
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix (f/​2.0) 5 MP (f/​2.2, wide) 2.0 MP (f/​2.4, macro) 2 MP (f/​2.4)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f2.2)
Additional features
Speakers: mono, 15-watt charger, USB cable, OneUI, 24 Months Warranty, Widevine L1, SAR value: 0.673 W/​kg head, 1.377 W/​kg body, fanless
Weight
205 g, Power Supply: 54 g
Price
170 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
74.9 %
12/2021
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1
205 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
75.2 %
12/2020
Samsung Galaxy A12
Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320
205 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
77.1 %
11/2021
Motorola Moto E40
Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2
198 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
79 %
11/2021
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2
181 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"2400x1080
77 %
11/2021
Oppo A16s
Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320
190 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.52"1600x720
三星Galaxy A12 Exynos的颜色选择
三星Galaxy A12 Exynos的颜色选择

纳乔的正面显示了一个水滴状的凹槽--与其他国家的凹槽没有区别。Galaxy A12这里,就像其他设计一样。显示屏上方和下方相当宽的边框对于这个价格范围来说是完全可以接受的。在数字上。大约82%的正面与显示屏相对应。

Galaxy A12 Exynos的塑料背面可以有两种颜色选择。你可以选择黑色和白色版本。正如一个入门级智能手机所预期的那样,Galaxy 手机的外壳既不能防止灰尘,也不能防止进水。用于音量调节的控制装置以及开/关开关都制造得很好,有令人愉悦的压力点。

制造质量达到了令人满意的水平,但Galaxy 智能手机并不感觉很高档。背面和框架都是由塑料制成的。我们喜欢这种略带纹理的表面--考虑到材料类型--它给了Nacho一个愉快的握持感。然而,触觉却因看似中空的背面而受到一定程度的损害。我们可以很容易地在三星标志上方的中央区域将塑料材料压入一到两毫米。

三星Galaxy A12 Exynos智能手机评论
三星Galaxy A12 Exynos智能手机评论
三星Galaxy A12 Exynos智能手机评论
三星Galaxy A12 Exynos智能手机评论
三星Galaxy A12 Exynos智能手机评论
三星Galaxy A12 Exynos智能手机评论
三星Galaxy A12 Exynos智能手机评论
三星Galaxy A12 Exynos智能手机评论

Size comparison

165.1 mm 75.6 mm 9.1 mm 198 g164 mm 75.8 mm 8.9 mm 205 g164 mm 75.8 mm 8.9 mm 205 g163.8 mm 75.6 mm 8.4 mm 190 g161.95 mm 75.53 mm 8.92 mm 181 g

连接性 -Galaxy A12 Exynos与3.5毫米音频插孔

Galaxy A12 Exynos的潜在买家可以选择32和64GB的eMMC存储,分别由3GB或4GB的RAM支持。考虑到操作系统和预装的应用程序,我们的评测样本开箱后只有22GB可用。这导致32GB版本的存储空间非常有限。然而,在不失去三星智能手机的双SIM卡功能的情况下,可以使用高达1TB的microSD卡来扩展存储。

Galaxy A12 Exynos的其他连接功能包括Miracast,它可以将显示内容无线传输到外部显示器,一个3.5毫米音频插孔和USB OTG。外部存储设备在测试中被可靠地识别,但由于使用的是USB 2.0标准,用USB Type-C端口的数据传输速度不是很高。

顶部(麦克风)
顶部(麦克风)
底部(扬声器、USB接口、麦克风、音频插孔)。
底部(扬声器、USB接口、麦克风、音频插孔)。
右边(按钮)
右边(按钮)
左侧(卡槽)
左侧(卡槽)

微型SD卡读卡器

这款SD读卡器从我们的Angelbird V60参考卡中提取了非常体面的传输速率。近50MB/s的复制速度处于良好水平,在跨平台磁盘测试中的表现也值得尊敬。

当使用microSD卡时,Nacho允许用户选择该存储介质是作为扩展还是作为内部存储使用。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
47.8 MB/s ∼100%
Oppo A16s
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G35, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
45.73 MB/s ∼96% -4%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
40.85 MB/s ∼85% -15%
Motorola Moto E40
Mali-G52 MP2, Tangula T700, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
11.8 MB/s ∼25% -75%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird V60: Ø32.3 (23.2-38.8)
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø37.8 (26-44.9)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird V60: Ø50.2 (31.6-54.4)
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø66.8 (7.33-79.4)

软件--三星智能手机与Android 11

与之不同的是 Galaxy A12,Nacho直接配备了Android 11。我们没能得到任何关于三星在测试期间何时提供Android 12的更新的信息。A12机型的推出计划至少在2022年7月,因此Exynos版本的类似时间表似乎是现实的。我们还推测,纳智捷和它的兄弟姐妹机型一样,将收到两个主要的Android 更新。后者在这个价格段是值得称赞的。

像往常一样,三星在3.1版本中把Android 系统和其内部的One UI(核心)用户界面结合起来,其中还包括智能助理Bixby。在安全更新方面,应该每季度发布一次https://security.samsungmobile.com/workScope.smsb,Galaxy A12 Exynos有点过时,其最新的更新是在10月的水平,但更高价位的中档替代产品通常也不是什么最新的。由于Widevine L1的认证过程已经完成,所以用Nacho可以以高清质量观看流媒体服务的视频内容。

Galaxy A12 Exynos不支持三星DeX。三星的Knox安全环境被整合到Nacho的软件以及硬件中。因此,这款价格低廉的中档机型没有通过三星DeX配备额外的桌面模式。

三星Galaxy A12 Exynos智能手机评论
三星Galaxy A12 Exynos智能手机评论
三星Galaxy A12 Exynos智能手机评论
三星Galaxy A12 Exynos智能手机评论

通信和GNSS -Galaxy A12 Exynos,Wi-Fi速度慢。

三星在其入门级智能手机中安装了一个专用的SIM卡托盘,可容纳两张nano SIM卡,以及一个内存扩展的插槽。Galaxy 智能手机的两个卡槽都可以通过LTE标准连接到移动互联网。作为这个价格区间的典型智能手机,纳智捷用于通信的频段数量不多。Exynos版本的Galaxy A12只能访问10个LTE频段。然而,对于德语区来说,没有缺少任何频段。

蓝牙5.0版本可用于无线通信,还搭载了一个用于近场通信(NFC)的芯片,因此谷歌支付可以在这款入门级手机上使用。为支付服务提供了Play Protect认证。

Wi-Fi模块只支持IEEE 802.11b/g/n标准,这意味着它只使用2.4GHz频段进行通信。这导致在我们的Wi-Fi测试中,平均传输速率非常低,约为40至50 Mb/s。此外,用Nighthawk AX12参考路由器测得的速率也不是很稳定。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1395, n=210, last 2 years)
485 MBit/s ∼100% +1031%
Oppo A16s
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G35, 64 GB eMMC Flash
294 (151min - 315max) MBit/s ∼61% +585%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash
293 (284min - 301max) MBit/s ∼60% +583%
Motorola Moto E40
Mali-G52 MP2, Tangula T700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
86.9 (78min - 93max) MBit/s ∼18% +103%
Samsung Galaxy A12
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P35 MT6765, 64 GB eMMC Flash
44.8 (30min - 59max) MBit/s ∼9% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
42.9 (21min - 65max) MBit/s ∼9%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1348, n=210, last 2 years)
472 MBit/s ∼100% +837%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash
333 (299min - 358max) MBit/s ∼71% +561%
Oppo A16s
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G35, 64 GB eMMC Flash
299 (200min - 346max) MBit/s ∼63% +493%
Motorola Moto E40
Mali-G52 MP2, Tangula T700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
87.2 (46min - 105max) MBit/s ∼18% +73%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
50.4 (41min - 57max) MBit/s ∼11%
Samsung Galaxy A12
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P35 MT6765, 64 GB eMMC Flash
50.3 (8min - 62max) MBit/s ∼11% 0%
05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø50.1 (41-57)
; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø42.9 (21-65)
追踪在室内是不可能的
追踪在室内是不可能的
在户外定位
在户外定位

为了评估实践中的定位精度,我们带着Galaxy 智能手机进行了一次短途旅行。我们同时用Garmin Venu 2记录路线以进行比较。GPS模块使用主要的卫星系统GPS(L1)、GLONASS、QZSS和Galileo(E1),以及基于卫星的补充系统SBAS来确定其位置。在近4.5公里的测试轨道末端,智能手机GPS模块和智能手表之间有大约20米的距离,这并不是很多。

Galaxy A12 Exynos也会出现轻微的定位错误,但在GPS日志的详细视图中,偏差相当小,所以路线上几乎没有任何值得注意的不准确之处。

三星Galaxy A12 Exynos
三星Galaxy A12 Exynos
三星Galaxy A12 Exynos
三星Galaxy A12 Exynos
三星Galaxy A12 Exynos
三星Galaxy A12 Exynos
Garmin Venu 2
Garmin Venu 2
Garmin Venu 2
Garmin Venu 2
Garmin Venu 2
Garmin Venu 2

电话和通话质量 - 带VoLTE的三星智能手机

这款低价的三星手机提供VoLTE功能以及Wi-Fi通话。在测试中,使用内置的前置摄像头通过Skype进行视频通话没有问题,而且通过扬声器可以清晰地再现声音。通过Galaxy A12 Exynos的听筒的通话质量也很好。我们在语音传输方面没有遇到任何问题。

摄像头 -Galaxy A12 Exynos四摄像头设置

三星Galaxy A12 Exynos的人像模式
三星Galaxy A12 Exynos的人像模式
使用三星Galaxy A12 Exynos的照片模式
使用三星Galaxy A12 Exynos的照片模式

位于正面打孔处的800万像素摄像头,在照片模式下能拍出扎实的自拍,并有高度的软化效果。在人像拍摄中,照片中的动态效果受到打击,即使在风雪条件下,天空看起来也是 "烧毁 "的。

就像 Galaxy A12,Nacho背面的相机模块除了4800万像素的主相机外,还提供了一个微距和深度相机,以及一个分辨率为500万像素的超广角镜头。用三星GM2拍摄的照片默认以像素分化模式拍摄,结果是12MP的图像而不是48MP的。

主摄像头的光圈为f/2.0,并配有EIS,对于这个价格范围来说,所取得的结果是完全没有问题的--但也不多。自动对焦功能并不总是可靠地工作,而且整体图像的清晰度可以更高一些。此外,细节经常被软焦冲掉,曝光也不总是最佳。在弱光下有明显的缺点,尽管被摄体的再现相当清晰。然而,动态范围不是很好,所以明亮的地方经常曝光过度。

凭借123度的视野,用超广角镜头可以捕捉到大量的图像内容。然而,我们看到这里的质量还有很大的改进空间。Galaxy 手机在曝光方面有很大的问题,而且图像清晰度已经很低,特别是在边缘处明显下降。

使用Nacho只能以30帧/秒的FHD质量录制视频,尽管其内置的Exynos 850理论上支持60帧。Galaxy A12 Exynos,录制时在广角和超广角镜头之间切换是不可能的。

广角
广角
主摄像头
2倍变焦
4倍变焦
10倍变焦(最大)
三星Galaxy A12 Exynos智能手机评论
三星Galaxy A12 Exynos智能手机评论
三星Galaxy A12 Exynos智能手机评论
三星Galaxy A12 Exynos智能手机评论

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow lightWide angle

我们使用ColorChecker Passport在受控的照明条件下分析4800万像素镜头的色彩再现,并与实际参考色彩进行对比。在完全的摄影棚照明和1勒克斯的光线强度下各检查一次颜色。除了智能手机典型的增亮外,Nacho在灰色调方面显示出与ColorChecker特别大的偏差。与参考色相比,棕色和绿色的色调在再现上也显示出不足之处。

我们的测试图的图片,包括像素划分,证实了相当高程度的软焦点和边缘的锐利度下降。

ColorChecker
23.4 ∆E
14 ∆E
20 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
17 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
21.3 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
19.9 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F: 14.98 ∆E min: 4.38 - max: 24.54 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.4 ∆E
51.5 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
35.6 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
62 ∆E
50.2 ∆E
31.8 ∆E
38.2 ∆E
26.8 ∆E
63.2 ∆E
63.2 ∆E
27.3 ∆E
46.1 ∆E
32.8 ∆E
73 ∆E
41.9 ∆E
42.1 ∆E
81 ∆E
68.7 ∆E
50.5 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
24 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F: 44.65 ∆E min: 14.11 - max: 80.95 ∆E

配件和保修 - 三星智能手机,带15瓦的充电器

三星Galaxy A12 Exynos的充电器
三星Galaxy A12 Exynos的充电器

除了三星手机,盒子里还包括一个15瓦的充电器,一条USB线,以及一个SIM卡针。Galaxy A12 Exynos不包括保护壳。这家韩国制造商也还没有在其在线商店中列出任何特殊配件。

三星提供24个月的 保修为其Galaxy A设备提供24个月的保修。

输入设备和处理 -Galaxy 带有FaceUnlock的A12 Exynos

一个主动式指纹扫描仪位于机箱的框架上。生物识别的手指相当可靠,但传感器的速度不是很高。另一个解锁选项是简单的二维人脸识别,它通过前置摄像头工作。识别率是引人注目的,但FaceUnlock功能相当不安全。

6.5英寸LC显示屏上的输入被准确而快速地处理,甚至到了触摸屏的角落。这款低价的三星手机并没有提供超过60赫兹的高刷新率。

三星Galaxy A12 Exynos智能手机评论
三星Galaxy A12 Exynos智能手机评论
三星Galaxy A12 Exynos智能手机评论

显示屏 - 三星智能手机的IPS面板

子像素网格
子像素网格
Galaxy A12 Exynos上的亮度分布不均匀
Galaxy A12 Exynos上的亮度分布不均匀

6.5英寸60赫兹LC显示屏的分辨率只有1600x720像素,因此像素密度很低,远低于300PPI。与红米10Redmi Note 8 2021,小米的竞争对手在这个价格段的清晰度上有明显优势。

PLS面板的亮度是均匀的。然而,在三星手机上,在前置摄像头的区域,阴影的形成清晰可见。此外,显示屏顶部边缘的照度也相当不均匀。

考虑到这是一款入门级手机,Nacho使用纯白显示背景的最大亮度在446cd/m²的令人满意的范围内,但从绝对值来看,这并不算多。而这个价格范围内的竞争者,如红米1090赫兹,其亮度比Galaxy A12 Exynos高得多。三星使用脉冲宽度调制(PWM)来控制显示亮度,尽管它是一个LC面板。我们注意到在显示屏亮度为7%时开始出现屏幕闪烁。

此外,我们用暗区和亮区的均匀分布比例(APL50)检查了显示屏的亮度。我们确定最大亮度为447cd/m²。

405
cd/m²
439
cd/m²
444
cd/m²
397
cd/m²
446
cd/m²
415
cd/m²
399
cd/m²
453
cd/m²
408
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 453 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 422.9 cd/m² Minimum: 8.78 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 446 cd/m²
Contrast: 1538:1 (Black: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.94 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 5.1 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
93.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.145
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
IPS LCD, 1600x720, 6.50
Samsung Galaxy A12
PLS-LCD, 1600x720, 6.50
Motorola Moto E40
IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
Xiaomi Redmi 10
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50
Oppo A16s
LCD, 1600x720, 6.52
Screen
-10%
-3%
34%
12%
Brightness middle
446
458
3%
452
1%
542
22%
607
36%
Brightness
423
427
1%
431
2%
518
22%
586
39%
Brightness Distribution
88
85
-3%
90
2%
93
6%
90
2%
Black Level *
0.29
0.53
-83%
0.46
-59%
0.22
24%
0.52
-79%
Contrast
1538
864
-44%
983
-36%
2464
60%
1167
-24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.94
4.04
18%
4.15
16%
3
39%
3.1
37%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.81
6.84
22%
6.47
27%
6.7
24%
6.7
24%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.1
4.8
6%
4
22%
1.4
73%
2
61%
Gamma
2.145 103%
2.293 96%
2.157 102%
2.27 97%
2.17 101%
CCT
7890 82%
7535 86%
7557 86%
6450 101%
6806 96%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 178.6 Hz ≤ 7 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 178.6 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 7 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 178.6 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21819 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

与IPS竞争对手相比,Galaxy A12 Exynos提供了一个吸引人的对比度。用分光光度计和CalMAN软件进行的分析并没有发现三星入门级智能手机与sRGB色彩空间的平均DeltaE偏差很低,数值为4.9(色彩)和5.1(灰度)--但考虑到价格水平,结果是可以接受的。

默认色温约为7900K,离理想值(6500K)也很远,与三星的中端和高端机型相比,Nacho的OneUI界面不允许对色彩再现进行任何调整。这意味着,略微偏蓝的颜色色调无法得到纠正。

色彩精度(目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩精度(目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩饱和度(目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩饱和度(目标色彩空间:sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (23.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
58 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 31 ms rise
↘ 27 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (36.8 ms).

LC面板的可视角度稳定性达到了一个不错的水平。即使在平坦的视角下,显示的内容也不会出现颜色反转。然而,即使稍微倾斜,显示屏也会明显变暗。

在没有阳光照射的情况下,这款三星手机在户外使用没有问题。如果加上阳光,A12 Exynos的亮度将不再足以能够正常阅读屏幕上的内容。

三星Galaxy A12 Exynos智能手机评论
三星Galaxy A12 Exynos智能手机评论
三星Galaxy A12 Exynos智能手机评论

性能 -Galaxy A12与Exynos SoC

与此相反的是Galaxy A12与它的 联发科MT6765 Helio P35而Nacho则配备了内部的Exynos 850SoC。后者提供八个核心,性能高达2GHz。不仅是处理器的性能低,而且内置的Mali-G52 MP1的图形能力也不高。Mali-G52 MP1的图形能力也相当低端。

尽管如此,在我们的基准测试包中,与之相比仍有明显的增长Galaxy A12与联发科SoC相比,仍然有显著的增长,特别是在图形方面。

不幸的是,这种性能提升在日常使用中并不明显。的Exynos 850与3GB内存的组合为入门级产品提供了坚实的系统性能。由于eMMC存储速度较慢,应用程序的加载时间相当明显,即使在简单的应用程序中,短暂的滞后也是日常发生的事情。当运行复杂的应用程序或后台进程时,Galaxy A12 Exynos上的One UI有时需要休息一下。

打开键盘往往需要几秒钟,在有大量图片内容的网站上,滚动非常不流畅。我们强烈建议所有可能购买Nacho的人选择4GB内存的版本,尽管可能仍然存在普遍的性能缺陷。

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
178 Points ∼27%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
169 Points ∼25% -5%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
356 Points ∼53% +100%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
365 Points ∼55% +105%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
176 Points ∼26% -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (155 - 183, n=5)
175.2 Points ∼26% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=254, last 2 years)
669 Points ∼100% +276%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1087 Points ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1022 Points ∼47% -6%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1393 Points ∼64% +28%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1265 Points ∼58% +16%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
965 Points ∼44% -11%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (586 - 1087, n=5)
944 Points ∼43% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=254, last 2 years)
2190 Points ∼100% +101%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
646 Points ∼25%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1021 Points ∼39% +58%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1267 Points ∼49% +96%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (565 - 646, n=5)
619 Points ∼24% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 8702, n=198, last 2 years)
2596 Points ∼100% +302%
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
654 Points ∼25%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1223 Points ∼48% +87%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (543 - 672, n=5)
625 Points ∼24% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 9069, n=199, last 2 years)
2565 Points ∼100% +292%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
5739 Points ∼57%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
8743 Points ∼86% +52%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
8842 Points ∼87% +54%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
5272 Points ∼52% -8%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (4966 - 6065, n=3)
5590 Points ∼55% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 18567, n=144, last 2 years)
10155 Points ∼100% +77%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1283 Points ∼38%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
733 Points ∼22% -43%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2203 Points ∼65% +72%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1817 Points ∼54% +42%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
850 Points ∼25% -34%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (1252 - 1289, n=5)
1273 Points ∼38% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=177, last 2 years)
3383 Points ∼100% +164%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1126 Points ∼29%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
645 Points ∼17% -43%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2070 Points ∼53% +84%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1709 Points ∼44% +52%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
774 Points ∼20% -31%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (1126 - 1179, n=5)
1146 Points ∼30% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=177, last 2 years)
3878 Points ∼100% +244%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
2048 Points ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1098 Points ∼39% -46%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2844 Points ∼100% +39%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2336 Points ∼82% +14%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1291 Points ∼45% -37%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (1912 - 2048, n=5)
2008 Points ∼71% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (677 - 5301, n=177, last 2 years)
2845 Points ∼100% +39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1273 Points ∼26%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
879 Points ∼18% -31%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2202 Points ∼45% +73%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1833 Points ∼37% +44%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
928 Points ∼19% -27%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (1260 - 1295, n=5)
1279 Points ∼26% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 13121, n=223, last 2 years)
4942 Points ∼100% +288%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1142 Points ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
811 Points ∼12% -29%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2052 Points ∼30% +80%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1713 Points ∼25% +50%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
853 Points ∼12% -25%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (1133 - 1175, n=5)
1150 Points ∼17% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 31940, n=223, last 2 years)
6921 Points ∼100% +506%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
2032 Points ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1123 Points ∼35% -45%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2961 Points ∼91% +46%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2426 Points ∼75% +19%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1343 Points ∼41% -34%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (2015 - 2190, n=5)
2091 Points ∼65% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (651 - 6394, n=221, last 2 years)
3237 Points ∼100% +59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
863 Points ∼34%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
367 Points ∼15% -57%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1486 Points ∼59% +72%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1394 Points ∼56% +62%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
486 Points ∼19% -44%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (861 - 912, n=5)
878 Points ∼35% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=178, last 2 years)
2510 Points ∼100% +191%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
738 Points ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
298 Points ∼11% -60%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1309 Points ∼50% +77%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1250 Points ∼48% +69%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
412 Points ∼16% -44%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (738 - 788, n=5)
756 Points ∼29% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=178, last 2 years)
2609 Points ∼100% +254%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
2031 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1098 Points ∼39% -46%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2821 Points ∼99% +39%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2339 Points ∼82% +15%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1301 Points ∼46% -36%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (1899 - 2037, n=5)
1989 Points ∼70% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (688 - 5318, n=178, last 2 years)
2846 Points ∼100% +40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
867 Points ∼22%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
478 Points ∼12% -45%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1554 Points ∼39% +79%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1416 Points ∼35% +63%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
539 Points ∼13% -38%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (866 - 916, n=5)
887 Points ∼22% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 11528, n=231, last 2 years)
4014 Points ∼100% +363%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
736 Points ∼15%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
423 Points ∼8% -43%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1368 Points ∼27% +86%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1265 Points ∼25% +72%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
462 Points ∼9% -37%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (736 - 791, n=5)
760 Points ∼15% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 19364, n=231, last 2 years)
5009 Points ∼100% +581%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
2109 Points ∼65%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1077 Points ∼33% -49%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2961 Points ∼92% +40%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2427 Points ∼75% +15%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1304 Points ∼40% -38%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (2042 - 2168, n=5)
2105 Points ∼65% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (635 - 5793, n=231, last 2 years)
3234 Points ∼100% +53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
954 Points ∼40%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
613 Points ∼26% -36%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1556 Points ∼66% +63%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1396 Points ∼59% +46%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (900 - 954, n=5)
935 Points ∼40% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (426 - 6977, n=160, last 2 years)
2363 Points ∼100% +148%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
839 Points ∼32%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
541 Points ∼21% -36%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1399 Points ∼54% +67%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1264 Points ∼49% +51%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (775 - 839, n=5)
810 Points ∼31% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 11259, n=160, last 2 years)
2604 Points ∼100% +210%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
2098 Points ∼82%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
2065 Points ∼80% -2%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2568 Points ∼100% +22%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2203 Points ∼86% +5%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (2020 - 2177, n=5)
2085 Points ∼81% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1567 - 3958, n=160, last 2 years)
2571 Points ∼100% +23%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
428 Points ∼13%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
729 Points ∼23% +70%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
712 Points ∼22% +66%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (422 - 513, n=4)
448 Points ∼14% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (216 - 10062, n=181, last 2 years)
3210 Points ∼100% +650%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
426 Points ∼13%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
722 Points ∼21% +69%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
721 Points ∼21% +69%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (423 - 509, n=4)
447 Points ∼13% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (174 - 11700, n=182, last 2 years)
3405 Points ∼100% +699%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
116 Points ∼12%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
184 Points ∼18% +59%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
182 Points ∼18% +57%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (116 - 139, n=3)
124.7 Points ∼12% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 3080, n=137, last 2 years)
1001 Points ∼100% +763%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
117 Points ∼12%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
183 Points ∼19% +56%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
181 Points ∼18% +55%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (117 - 117, n=2)
117 Points ∼12% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (101 - 2864, n=133, last 2 years)
983 Points ∼100% +740%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
33 fps ∼48%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
31 fps ∼45% -6%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
42 fps ∼61% +27%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (22 - 35, n=5)
31.6 fps ∼46% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.5 - 143, n=194, last 2 years)
69.1 fps ∼100% +109%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
24 fps ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
23 fps ∼16% -4%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
46 fps ∼33% +92%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (24 - 25, n=5)
24.2 fps ∼17% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 439, n=194, last 2 years)
139.9 fps ∼100% +483%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
28 fps ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
20 fps ∼36% -29%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
18 fps ∼32% -36%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (14 - 29, n=5)
25.4 fps ∼45% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 121, n=193, last 2 years)
56.1 fps ∼100% +100%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
16 fps ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
12 fps ∼15% -25%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
25 fps ∼31% +56%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (15 - 16, n=5)
15.8 fps ∼20% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.4 - 251, n=194, last 2 years)
80.1 fps ∼100% +401%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
19 fps ∼44%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
13 fps ∼30% -32%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
13 fps ∼30% -32%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (8.2 - 20, n=5)
17 fps ∼39% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 121, n=193, last 2 years)
43.6 fps ∼100% +129%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
9.4 fps ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
7.9 fps ∼15% -16%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
16 fps ∼30% +70%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (9.4 - 9.4, n=5)
9.4 fps ∼17% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 169, n=194, last 2 years)
54.2 fps ∼100% +477%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
11 fps ∼40%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
5 fps ∼18% -55%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9.1 fps ∼33% -17%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (5.1 - 12, n=5)
10 fps ∼36% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.3 - 81, n=193, last 2 years)
27.5 fps ∼100% +150%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
6 fps ∼18%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
3.3 fps ∼10% -45%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9.6 fps ∼29% +60%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (5.9 - 6.1, n=5)
6.02 fps ∼18% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 97, n=193, last 2 years)
32.8 fps ∼100% +447%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
11 fps ∼38%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
7.5 fps ∼26% -32%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
19 fps ∼66% +73%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9 fps ∼31% -18%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
7.8 fps ∼27% -29%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (5.3 - 12, n=5)
10.3 fps ∼36% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 98, n=249, last 2 years)
28.7 fps ∼100% +161%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
6.2 fps ∼18%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
4.2 fps ∼12% -32%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
11 fps ∼32% +77%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9.7 fps ∼29% +56%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
4.2 fps ∼12% -32%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (6.1 - 6.2, n=5)
6.18 fps ∼18% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.9 - 123, n=250, last 2 years)
34 fps ∼100% +448%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
7 fps ∼35%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
4.7 fps ∼24% -33%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
12 fps ∼61% +71%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
5.9 fps ∼30% -16%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
5 fps ∼25% -29%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (3.3 - 7.4, n=5)
6.4 fps ∼32% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.1 - 69, n=250, last 2 years)
19.8 fps ∼100% +183%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
2.2 fps ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1.5 fps ∼12% -32%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3.7 fps ∼28% +68%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3.5 fps ∼27% +59%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1.5 fps ∼12% -32%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (2.2 - 2.2, n=5)
2.2 fps ∼17% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.7 - 47, n=250, last 2 years)
13 fps ∼100% +491%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
119981 Points ∼33%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
108503 Points ∼30% -10%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
185120 Points ∼51% +54%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (119981 - 133391, n=4)
126175 Points ∼35% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (77514 - 727247, n=127, last 2 years)
360339 Points ∼100% +200%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
4453 Points ∼7%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7120 Points ∼12% +60%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (4354 - 4453, n=3)
4411 Points ∼7% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 286905, n=128, last 2 years)
61072 Points ∼100% +1271%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1637 Points ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1318 Points ∼31% -19%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2247 Points ∼53% +37%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (1533 - 1644, n=5)
1599 Points ∼38% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (895 - 8124, n=169, last 2 years)
4231 Points ∼100% +158%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
3345 Points ∼45%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
2983 Points ∼40% -11%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4065 Points ∼54% +22%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (3042 - 3382, n=5)
3239 Points ∼43% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1542 - 19657, n=169, last 2 years)
7493 Points ∼100% +124%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1836 Points ∼38%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1268 Points ∼26% -31%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3204 Points ∼66% +75%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (1533 - 1904, n=5)
1780 Points ∼37% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1012 - 9044, n=169, last 2 years)
4850 Points ∼100% +164%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1263 Points ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1023 Points ∼14% -19%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1878 Points ∼26% +49%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (1159 - 1263, n=5)
1219 Points ∼17% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (478 - 25642, n=169, last 2 years)
7348 Points ∼100% +482%
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
947 Points ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
887 Points ∼64% -6%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1042 Points ∼75% +10%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (893 - 990, n=5)
931 Points ∼67% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (718 - 2392, n=169, last 2 years)
1386 Points ∼100% +46%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 58042, n=168, last 2 years)
407 Points ∼100% +1816%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
28.58 Points ∼7% +35%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F (Chrome96)
21.24 Points ∼5%
Average Samsung Exynos 850 (18.4 - 22.3, n=5)
19.9 Points ∼5% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A12 (Chrome 88)
17.19 Points ∼4% -19%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 414, n=170, last 2 years)
114.4 Points ∼100% +252%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
50.2 Points ∼44% +55%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F (Chrome96)
32.46 Points ∼28%
Average Samsung Exynos 850 (27.1 - 32.5, n=4)
28.7 Points ∼25% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A12 (Chrome 88)
25.44 Points ∼22% -22%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 244, n=154, last 2 years)
60.7 runs/min ∼100% +272%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
24.4 runs/min ∼40% +50%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F (Chrome96)
16.3 runs/min ∼27%
Average Samsung Exynos 850 (15 - 16.7, n=5)
15.8 runs/min ∼26% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A12 (Chrome 88)
13.7 runs/min ∼23% -16%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 265, n=177, last 2 years)
91.8 Points ∼100% +142%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
48 Points ∼52% +26%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F (Chrome96)
38 Points ∼41%
Average Samsung Exynos 850 (35 - 39, n=5)
36.4 Points ∼40% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A12 (Chrome 88)
32 Points ∼35% -16%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (3526 - 65969, n=182, last 2 years)
23168 Points ∼100% +296%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
10625 Points ∼46% +82%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F (Chrome96)
5849 Points ∼25%
Average Samsung Exynos 850 (4875 - 5904, n=5)
5333 Points ∼23% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A12 (Chrome 88)
4643 Points ∼20% -21%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy A12 (Chrome 88)
11082 ms * ∼100% -31%
Average Samsung Exynos 850 (8327 - 9397, n=5)
8925 ms * ∼81% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F (Chrome96)
8472 ms * ∼76%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
3706 ms * ∼33% +56%
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 15230, n=182, last 2 years)
3203 ms * ∼29% +62%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127FSamsung Galaxy A12Motorola Moto E40Xiaomi Redmi 10Oppo A16sAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
35%
9%
69%
14%
17%
272%
Sequential Read 256KB
302.3
269.7
-11%
265
-12%
321.3
6%
289.2
-4%
272 ?(95.6 - 704, n=187)
-10%
926 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=247, last 2 years)
206%
Sequential Write 256KB
74.5
211.6
184%
156.3
110%
178
139%
168.4
126%
176.4 ?(40 - 274, n=187)
137%
469 ?(11.9 - 1485, n=247, last 2 years)
530%
Random Read 4KB
77.8
65.4
-16%
56
-28%
100.7
29%
45.32
-42%
58.9 ?(9.58 - 148.5, n=187)
-24%
165.6 ?(13.5 - 345, n=247, last 2 years)
113%
Random Write 4KB
47.21
39.1
-17%
30.7
-35%
95.8
103%
35.23
-25%
30.9 ?(2.34 - 146.9, n=187)
-35%
158.9 ?(56.5 - 458, n=248, last 2 years)
237%

游戏--三星智能手机,50帧/秒

相对较弱的 Mali-G52 MP1只支持一个集群,仍然可以运行来自Android Play Store的高要求游戏--至少在最低的图形设置下。使用GameBench的应用程序我们仔细看看几个游戏,以更好地评估Galaxy A12 Exynos的3D性能。

现代游戏,如PUBG Mobile,在中等细节(高清)下几乎无法播放。该射击游戏以平均28帧的速度再现,但强烈的帧率下降(高达18帧)破坏了游戏体验。游戏在最低图形模式下运行得更好,几乎达到40帧。

对图形功率要求较低的游戏也运行得更好。在我们的测量中,竞技场射击游戏Armajet最高达到50 fps。然而,重现率波动很大,所以平均达到40帧左右。

三星Galaxy A12 Exynos智能手机评论
三星Galaxy A12 Exynos智能手机评论
05101520253035404550Tooltip
; Armajet: Ø40.3 (28-50)
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø38.9 (23-43)
; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø37.2 (31-42)
; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø28 (18-31)

排放 - A12 Exynos保持不变

温度

GFXBench在Galaxy A12 Exynos上运行。

根据我们的测量,机箱背面的最高温度略低于39℃(约102°F)。这是很明显的,但在日常使用中绝对无害。我们使用GFXBench和3DMark测试,看看系统在长时间处于负载状态时是否会节流,如果会,程度如何。

Galaxy A12 Exynos在两项基准测试中都保持非常稳定。三星手机以几乎100%的最大性能完成了3DMark Wild Life的压力测试。

三星Galaxy A12 Exynos智能手机评论
三星Galaxy A12 Exynos智能手机评论
Max. Load
 37.1 °C31.8 °C31.9 °C 
 37.5 °C31.7 °C32.8 °C 
 35.9 °C31.1 °C32.2 °C 
Maximum: 37.5 °C
Average: 33.6 °C
31.8 °C33.3 °C36.8 °C
31.4 °C33 °C38.7 °C
29.9 °C31.9 °C37.8 °C
Maximum: 38.7 °C
Average: 33.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  38.4 °C | Room Temperature 21.3 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.6 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.8 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
99.2 (2.57min) % ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash
98.2 (4.26min) % ∼99% -1%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash
98.9 (1.09min) % ∼100% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
96.1 (0.701min) % ∼97%
00.20.40.70.91.11.31.51.722.22.42.62.833.33.53.73.94.1Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø0.708 (0.701-0.73)
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø1.096 (1.09-1.102)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.59 (2.57-2.59)
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.32 (4.26-4.34)
三星Galaxy A12 Exynos智能手机评论
三星Galaxy A12 Exynos智能手机评论

演讲者

Galaxy A12 Exynos的内置单声道扬声器的音量足够大,超过86分贝。高音和中音都没有得到线性再现,但无论如何,这个价格区间并没有提供更好的声音。尽管如此,在入门级领域也有配备立体声扬声器的竞争对手,如 红米10,例如,它听起来比Galaxy 手机中的单声道声音好得多。

另一方面,Nacho的3.5毫米音频插孔给人留下了良好印象。声音输出干净而响亮。想通过蓝牙5.0无线播放音乐的人可以使用SBC、AAC、aptX和LDAC。然而,一些编解码器,如aptX HD或aptX Adaptive,在这里没有。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.945.32544.745.3313436.74036.836.75042.640.66337.333.88026.225.910028.327.612522.422.216018.933.42001640.525014.546.331513.253.84001359.150016.565.163019.566.280019.666100017.468.5125015.374.4160015.378.5200015.778.4250016.576.3315017.977.5400020.870.350002267.2630020.974.1800021.772.71000022.870.3125002263.11600022.558.5SPL31.586.4N1.462.6median 18.9median 66.2Delta311.73739.325.629.829.124.623.423.936.833.128.425.724.823.622.426.819.227.116.940.915.641.713.847.613.456.313.362.913.867.41273.112.773.112.274.11374.813.77613.278.113.480.61381.713.377.813.67613.374.113.872.513.769.61463.813.556.925.588.90.773.6median 13.5median 72.50.710.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127FXiaomi Redmi 10
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Redmi 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命 -Galaxy A12 Exynos,5,000 mAh

能源消耗

Galaxy 智能手机有一个5000毫安时的电池,用附带的15瓦电源适配器可以在大约2小时内完全充电。Nacho的耗电量基本正常。然而,空闲时的消耗仍然可以进行一些优化。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.4 / 1.9 / 2.1 Watt
Load midlight 3.8 / 5.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A12
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 10
5000 mAh
Oppo A16s
5000 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 850
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-4%
10%
27%
-2%
2%
Idle Minimum *
1.4
1.1
21%
0.53
62%
0.44
69%
1.22 ?(0.9 - 1.5, n=5)
13%
0.913 ?(0.12 - 2.5, n=194, last 2 years)
35%
Idle Average *
1.9
1.6
16%
2.01
-6%
1.67
12%
1.82 ?(1.6 - 2.1, n=5)
4%
1.67 ?(0.65 - 3.6, n=194, last 2 years)
12%
Idle Maximum *
2.1
2.6
-24%
2.02
4%
1.68
20%
2.42 ?(2.1 - 2.9, n=5)
-15%
1.897 ?(0.69 - 3.7, n=194, last 2 years)
10%
Load Average *
3.8
4.5
-18%
4.11
-8%
2.91
23%
4.06 ?(3.6 - 4.6, n=5)
-7%
4.49 ?(2.1 - 7.74, n=194, last 2 years)
-18%
Load Maximum *
5.6
6.4
-14%
5.76
-3%
4.95
12%
5.94 ?(5.3 - 6.6, n=5)
-6%
7.33 ?(3.56 - 11.9, n=194, last 2 years)
-31%

* ... smaller is better

Energy consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)