红米Note 9S智能手机评测：大屏低价

Name: Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Brand: Xiaomi

像素级放大？ 如果将具有变焦功能的高像素相机与一块巨大的电池结合在一起，会得到什么？小米Redmi Note 9S仅售210美元（约1400元）。从我们的评测中找出它做出哪些妥协（如果有的话）。

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt, ✓ Andrea Grüblinger (translated by Zewei Shen), Published 06/26/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone

Test device courtesy of TradingShenzhen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Redmi Note 12 Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G 8 x 2.3 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 618

Memory

6 GB

Display

6.67 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, capacitive, IPS, 康宁大猩猩玻璃5, glossy: yes, 60 Hz

Storage

128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 128 GB

, 110 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机插孔, Card Reader: 最大512 GB的microSD，专用, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速计，陀螺仪，接近传感器，指南针, USB-C

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/900/1,800/1,900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.8 x 165.8 x 76.7

Battery

5020 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 10

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix f / 1.79，相位检测自动对焦，LED闪光灯，@ 2160p / 30fps，720p / 960fps的视频（相机1）; 8.0MP，f / 2.2，广角（相机2）; 5.0MP，f / 2.4，广角（相机3）; 2.0MP，f / 2.4，景深（相机4）
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f / 2.48，视频@ 1080p / 30fps

Additional features

Speakers: 底部单声道扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟键盘, 充电器，USB线，SIM工具，硅胶手机壳, 24 Months Warranty, 头部SAR：0,72W / kg，主体SAR0,98W / kg; LTE速度：800 Mbps（下载），150 Mbps（上传）, fanless

Weight

209 g, Power Supply: 76 g

Price

229 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Test Group

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
80.7 %	06/2020	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S SD 720G, Adreno 618	209 g	128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.67"	2400x1080
76.6 %	06/2020	Motorola Moto G8 SD 665, Adreno 610	188 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.40"	1560x720
81.3 %	04/2020	Huawei P40 Lite Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6	183 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.40"	2310x1080
75.5 %	12/2019	Gigaset GS290 Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2	190 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.30"	2340x1080
80.7 %	10/2019	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4	200 g	128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.53"	2340x1080

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei P40 Lite Mali-G52 MP6, Kirin 810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	338 (286^min - 403^max) MBit/s +32%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	319 (302^min - 325^max) MBit/s +25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	256 (247^min - 263^max) MBit/s
Gigaset GS290 Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763V, 64 GB eMMC Flash	107 (81^min - 121^max) MBit/s -58%
Motorola Moto G8 Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash	55.8 (40^min - 67^max) MBit/s -78%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)	376 MBit/s +31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	353 (330^min - 362^max) MBit/s +23%
Huawei P40 Lite Mali-G52 MP6, Kirin 810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	298 (61^min - 334^max) MBit/s +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	286 (225^min - 321^max) MBit/s
Gigaset GS290 Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763V, 64 GB eMMC Flash	111 (98^min - 120^max) MBit/s -61%
Motorola Moto G8 Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash	54.4 (38^min - 57^max) MBit/s -81%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø286 (225-321)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø256 (247-263)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8 Pro

Olympus E-M10 II

click to load images

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8 Pro

Olympus E-M10 II

click to load images

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8 Pro

Olympus E-M10 II

ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S: 7.3 ∆E min: 2.68 - max: 15.59 ∆E


615 cd/m²	628 cd/m²	603 cd/m²
610 cd/m²	622 cd/m²	602 cd/m²
618 cd/m²	590 cd/m²	617 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 628 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 611.7 cd/m² Minimum: 18.8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 622 cd/m²
Contrast: 1111:1 (Black: 0.56 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.98 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
114.9% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
Gamma: 2.206

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67	Motorola Moto G8 IPS, 1560x720, 6.40	Huawei P40 Lite IPS, 2310x1080, 6.40	Gigaset GS290 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.30	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro IPS, 2340x1080, 6.53
Screen		15%	0%	11%	-1%
Brightness middle	622	504 -19%	478 -23%	465 -25%	669 8%
Brightness	612	452 -26%	448 -27%	460 -25%	630 3%
Brightness Distribution	94	83 -12%	87 -7%	88 -6%	87 -7%
Black Level *	0.56	0.28 50%	0.49 12%	0.2 64%	0.42 25%
Contrast	1111	1800 62%	976 -12%	2325 109%	1593 43%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.98	3.84 4%	3 25%	5.3 -33%	4.8 -21%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.33	6.1 17%	5.6 24%	7.3 -0%	9 -23%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.5	2.7 40%	4.1 9%	4.2 7%	6.2 -38%
Gamma	2.206 ^100%	2.235 ^98%	2.26 ^97%	2.09 ^105%	2.24 ^98%
CCT	7361 ^88%	7125 ^91%	7282 ^89%	6558 ^99%	7846 ^83%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	114.9

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 9 ms rise
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 21 ms rise
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 70 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	559 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	309 Points -45%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	604 Points +8%
Gigaset GS290 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	150 Points -73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (545 - 570, n=7)	562 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 2138, n=219, last 2 years)	913 Points +63%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	1690 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1280 Points -24%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	1949 Points +15%
Gigaset GS290 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	875 Points -48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (1622 - 1798, n=7)	1713 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6681, n=219, last 2 years)	2996 Points +77%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	1173 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	363 Points -69%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	2493 Points +113%
Gigaset GS290 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	688 Points -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (1163 - 1201, n=3)	1179 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (516 - 18876, n=46, last 2 years)	7173 Points +512%
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	1005 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	447 Points -56%
Gigaset GS290 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	709 Points -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (982 - 1063, n=3)	1017 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (281 - 18656, n=52, last 2 years)	7719 Points +668%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2620 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1495 Points -43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2484 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G ()	2620 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (934 - 9574, n=91, last 2 years)	5228 Points +100%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	6263 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	5134 Points -18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	7624 Points +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G ()	6263 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 26990, n=91, last 2 years)	14045 Points +124%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	5702 Points
Average of class Smartphone (2053 - 18432, n=72, last 2 years)	10872 Points

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	9027 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	9051 Points 0%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	12070 Points +34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	14946 Points +66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (9027 - 13821, n=7)	10741 Points +19%
Average of class Smartphone (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years)	15091 Points +67%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	7673 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	6969 Points -9%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	9164 Points +19%
Gigaset GS290 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	5068 Points -34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	9967 Points +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (7673 - 10181, n=7)	8748 Points +14%
Average of class Smartphone (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years)	10872 Points +42%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	38671 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	24745 Points -36%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	41003 Points +6%
Gigaset GS290 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	11286 Points -71%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	33832 Points -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (33926 - 40241, n=5)	38044 Points -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	52700 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	24828 Points -53%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	47563 Points -10%
Gigaset GS290 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	11180 Points -79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	39137 Points -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (49743 - 53689, n=5)	52304 Points -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	20019 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	24457 Points +22%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	27654 Points +38%
Gigaset GS290 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	11675 Points -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	22928 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (14849 - 24117, n=5)	19808 Points -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3501 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1758 Points -50%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	3437 Points -2%
Gigaset GS290 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	725 Points -79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2390 Points -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (3086 - 3683, n=7)	3509 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (712 - 7285, n=50, last 2 years)	3766 Points +8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3647 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1632 Points -55%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	3384 Points -7%
Gigaset GS290 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	630 Points -83%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2219 Points -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (3195 - 3853, n=7)	3642 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (618 - 9451, n=50, last 2 years)	4186 Points +15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3070 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2405 Points -22%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	3638 Points +19%
Gigaset GS290 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1545 Points -50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	3267 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (2757 - 3263, n=7)	3116 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4525, n=50, last 2 years)	3082 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3669 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1783 Points -51%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	3591 Points -2%
Gigaset GS290 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	741 Points -80%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2412 Points -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (3172 - 3783, n=7)	3625 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (704 - 23024, n=114, last 2 years)	9351 Points +155%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3803 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1669 Points -56%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	3488 Points -8%
Gigaset GS290 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	642 Points -83%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2323 Points -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (3323 - 4008, n=7)	3796 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (607 - 45492, n=113, last 2 years)	16352 Points +330%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3267 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2347 Points -28%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	4003 Points +23%
Gigaset GS290 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1619 Points -50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	3362 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (2737 - 3267, n=7)	3135 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=113, last 2 years)	4426 Points +35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2507 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1093 Points -56%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	2904 Points +16%
Gigaset GS290 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	523 Points -79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2390 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (2499 - 2590, n=7)	2542 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 7890, n=105, last 2 years)	2755 Points +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2369 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	945 Points -60%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	2740 Points +16%
Gigaset GS290 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	440 Points -81%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2218 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (2356 - 2462, n=7)	2408 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 9814, n=105, last 2 years)	2751 Points +16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3152 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2409 Points -24%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	3676 Points +17%
Gigaset GS290 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1541 Points -51%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	3280 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (3083 - 3241, n=7)	3158 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 4679, n=105, last 2 years)	3163 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2680 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1138 Points -58%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	2954 Points +10%
Gigaset GS290 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	515 Points -81%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2412 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (2253 - 2743, n=7)	2631 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=182, last 2 years)	6737 Points +151%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2551 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	990 Points -61%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	2752 Points +8%
Gigaset GS290 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	431 Points -83%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2322 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (2146 - 2642, n=7)	2515 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=181, last 2 years)	9723 Points +281%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3256 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2379 Points -27%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	3972 Points +22%
Gigaset GS290 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1619 Points -50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	3326 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (2730 - 3321, n=7)	3137 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (938 - 8480, n=181, last 2 years)	4224 Points +30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2353 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1052 Points -55%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	2636 Points +12%
Gigaset GS290 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	564 Points -76%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2087 Points -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (1989 - 2454, n=7)	2320 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6439, n=99, last 2 years)	2671 Points +14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2257 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	914 Points -60%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	2552 Points +13%
Gigaset GS290 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	466 Points -79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	1978 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (1874 - 2382, n=7)	2237 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=99, last 2 years)	2850 Points +26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2765 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2240 Points -19%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	2977 Points +8%
Gigaset GS290 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	2129 Points -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2543 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (2536 - 2765, n=7)	2675 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 3525, n=99, last 2 years)	2675 Points -3%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	59 fps
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	42 fps -29%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	59 fps 0%
Gigaset GS290 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	20 fps -66%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	58 fps -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (59 - 70, n=5)	63.4 fps +7%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 165, n=183, last 2 years)	84.6 fps +43%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	86 fps
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	36 fps -58%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	89 fps +3%
Gigaset GS290 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	22 fps -74%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	82 fps -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (71 - 86, n=5)	80.8 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=183, last 2 years)	247 fps +187%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	37 fps
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	34 fps -8%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	52 fps +41%
Gigaset GS290 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	10 fps -73%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	42 fps +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (34 - 39, n=5)	37 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=185, last 2 years)	72.2 fps +95%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	42 fps
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	19 fps -55%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	53 fps +26%
Gigaset GS290 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	11 fps -74%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	49 fps +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (35 - 42, n=5)	39.6 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (9.2 - 363, n=185, last 2 years)	140.6 fps +235%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	27 fps
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	27 fps 0%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	34 fps +26%
Gigaset GS290 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	6.1 fps -77%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	26 fps -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (24 - 29, n=5)	26.8 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years)	60.9 fps +126%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	31 fps
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	13 fps -58%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	33 fps +6%
Gigaset GS290 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	6.7 fps -78%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	29 fps -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (25 - 31, n=5)	29.4 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years)	99 fps +219%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	16 fps
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	13 fps -19%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	20 fps +25%
Gigaset GS290 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	3.7 fps -77%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	14 fps -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (14 - 17, n=5)	15.6 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 117, n=185, last 2 years)	43.4 fps +171%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	18 fps
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	7.2 fps -60%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	19 fps +6%
Gigaset GS290 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	4 fps -78%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	16 fps -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (14 - 18, n=5)	17 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (2.9 - 166, n=185, last 2 years)	59.9 fps +233%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	15 fps -12%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	21 fps +24%
Gigaset GS290 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	3.6 fps -79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	17 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (17 - 17, n=7)	17 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=226, last 2 years)	44 fps +159%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	8.2 fps
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	21 fps
Gigaset GS290 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	3.9 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	19 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (15 - 19, n=6)	18 fps
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 229, n=226, last 2 years)	64.3 fps
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	11 fps
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	9.1 fps -17%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	13 fps +18%
Gigaset GS290 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	2.2 fps -80%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	6.8 fps -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (11 - 11, n=7)	11 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.8 - 119, n=226, last 2 years)	32.8 fps +198%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	7 fps
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2.8 fps -60%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	7.9 fps +13%
Gigaset GS290 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1.4 fps -80%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	11 fps +57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (6.8 - 7.1, n=7)	6.96 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 94, n=226, last 2 years)	25.6 fps +266%

AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	275931 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	167305 Points -39%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	319383 Points +16%
Gigaset GS290 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	108862 Points -61%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	282085 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (253274 - 288306, n=5)	272982 Points -1%

Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	19.4 (3.7^min - 33.6^max) fps
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	21.2 (4.9^min - 40.7^max) fps
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	18.1 (2.3^min - 44.7^max) fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	0 fps

VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2416 Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	3243 Score +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G ()	2416 Score 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=12, last 2 years)	5985 Score +148%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3542 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2318 Points -35%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	3695 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	3054 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (3287 - 3542, n=5)	3412 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)	5759 Points +63%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	6828 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	4391 Points -36%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	7178 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	6155 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (5783 - 6908, n=5)	6506 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)	9672 Points +42%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	4295 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2780 Points -35%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	4726 Points +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	3609 Points -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (3845 - 4573, n=5)	4204 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)	6267 Points +46%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3807 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1932 Points -49%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	4339 Points +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	3419 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (3757 - 3830, n=5)	3786 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)	14220 Points +274%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	1410 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1224 Points -13%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	1267 Points -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	1145 Points -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (1226 - 1410, n=5)	1315 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)	1495 Points +6%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)	106.1 Points +119%
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)	55.4 Points +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)	48.53 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (37.8 - 54.4, n=4)	47.2 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)	35.3 Points -27%
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81)	29.12 Points -40%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)	104.3 Points +17%
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)	91.2 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)	89.5 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (59.7 - 94.7, n=5)	84.1 Points -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)	72.1 Points -19%
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81)	33.38 Points -63%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)	107.1 runs/min +143%
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)	53.2 runs/min +21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chome 81)	44.1 runs/min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)	41.6 runs/min -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (26.8 - 45.2, n=4)	38.5 runs/min -13%
Motorola Moto G8 (Chome 81)	25.4 runs/min -42%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)	133.1 Points +93%
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)	97 Points +41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)	69 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (53 - 78, n=5)	67.6 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)	55 Points -20%
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81)	38 Points -45%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=213, last 2 years)	33503 Points +94%
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)	17925 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)	17303 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (11846 - 17734, n=5)	16261 Points -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)	15606 Points -10%
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81)	6133 Points -65%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81)	6719 ms * -140%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)	3002 ms * -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (2532 - 3577, n=5)	2957 ms * -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)	2794 ms *
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)	2472 ms * +12%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)	1595 ms * +43%

* ... smaller is better

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S	Motorola Moto G8	Huawei P40 Lite	Gigaset GS290	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro	Average 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-17%	28%	-26%	10%	-5%	206%
Sequential Read 256KB	496.6	301 -39%	913 84%	274.2 -45%	535 8%	530 ?(286 - 948, n=36) 7%	1508 ?(226 - 4512, n=218, last 2 years) 204%
Sequential Write 256KB	214.8	239 11%	181.7 -15%	196.8 -8%	193.5 -10%	215 ?(142.8 - 466, n=36) 0%	1118 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=218, last 2 years) 420%
Random Read 4KB	137	57.3 -58%	157.3 15%	54.7 -60%	156.2 14%	129.6 ?(65 - 233, n=36) -5%	247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=218, last 2 years) 80%
Random Write 4KB	123.6	128.1 4%	175.4 42%	19.77 -84%	180.4 46%	100.7 ?(13.5 - 187.4, n=36) -19%	272 ?(13 - 709, n=218, last 2 years) 120%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	74.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	68.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -8%	82.6 ?(Nano Memory Card) 11%	81.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 9%	71.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -4%	68.3 ?(30.2 - 86, n=20) -8%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	54.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	48.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -11%	70.6 ?(Nano Memory Card) 29%	73.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 35%	57.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 4%	53.2 ?(28.6 - 70.2, n=20) -3%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 0.18.0: Ø29.9 (28-31)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S; PUBG Mobile; HD; 0.18.0: Ø29.8 (19-31)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S; Arena of Valor; min; 1.34.1.10: Ø30.2 (29-31)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.34.1.10: Ø30.1 (2-31)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 2.2.2a: Ø29.6 (23-31)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 2.2.2a: Ø29.6 (21-31)

Max. Load

Idle


39.9 °C	36.1 °C	34.8 °C
39.4 °C	36.3 °C	34.4 °C
37.6 °C	35.7 °C	34.3 °C

Maximum: 39.9 °C
Average: 36.5 °C


31.2 °C	36.1 °C	39.9 °C
33 °C	36 °C	37.4 °C
33 °C	35.4 °C	36.7 °C

Maximum: 39.9 °C
Average: 35.4 °C

Power Supply (max.) 39.6 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 64.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 64.7% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 64.7% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (119.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Motorola Moto G8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 62.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 62.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 62.9% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (120.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.3 Watt
Idle	1.5 / 2.1 / 2.5 Watt
Load	5.2 / 7.5 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S 5020 mAh	Motorola Moto G8 4000 mAh	Huawei P40 Lite 4200 mAh	Gigaset GS290 4700 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro 4500 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		7%	24%	19%	10%	20%	18%
Idle Minimum *	1.5	1.3 13%	0.79 47%	0.88 41%	0.79 47%	0.982 ?(0.75 - 1.5, n=5) 35%	0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years) 40%
Idle Average *	2.1	2 5%	2.14 -2%	2.05 2%	2.32 -10%	1.94 ?(1.79 - 2.19, n=5) 8%	1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years) 31%
Idle Maximum *	2.5	2.8 -12%	2.23 11%	2.1 16%	2.38 5%	2.06 ?(1.84 - 2.5, n=5) 18%	1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years) 35%
Load Average *	5.2	3.9 25%	3.6 31%	4.73 9%	4.72 9%	4.02 ?(2.65 - 5.41, n=5) 23%	5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years) -7%
Load Maximum *	7.5	7.2 4%	5.17 31%	5.61 25%	7.68 -2%	6.16 ?(4.86 - 7.59, n=5) 18%	8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years) -11%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		37h 43min
WiFi Websurfing		19h 47min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		21h 9min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 39min

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S 5020 mAh	Motorola Moto G8 4000 mAh	Huawei P40 Lite 4200 mAh	Gigaset GS290 4700 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro 4500 mAh
Battery Runtime		-12%	-11%	-21%	-22%
Reader / Idle	2263	1953 -14%	2154 -5%		1893 -16%
H.264	1269	1048 -17%	1176 -7%		984 -22%
WiFi v1.3	1187	988 -17%	1007 -15%	934 -21%	864 -27%
Load	279	276 -1%	228 -18%		212 -24%

Pros

+ 续航时间很长

+ 多功能相机阵列

+ 红外端口

+ 撰写本文时的安卓系统是最新的

+ 性能表现不错...

+ ...没有降频

+ microSD读卡器

+ 快速充电

Cons

- 没有NFC

- 低对比度显示

- 预装的垃圾软件

Verdict – A Lot to Offer

In review: Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. Test unit provided by Trading Shenzhen

小米的Redmi Note 9S足以证明，无论是在尺寸还是在设备和连接性方面，200美元的价格都能在2020年为买带来出色的智能手机。当然，您不应期望LTE，Wi-Fi 6或NFC的性能可以达到高端智能手机的水平。

Redmi Note 9S提供的是具有多个可使用镜头的灵活多样的相机阵列。同样，不要期望与昂贵得多的高端智能手机具有相同的照片质量，但是稍微降低您的期望将足以接受您对相机系统的实际需求。

您还将获得一块巨大的电池，也是造成Redmi比较重的原因。在我们的Wi-Fi测试中，续航时间将近20小时。

小米Redmi Note 9S以低廉的价格提供了不错的相机和更长的续航时间。

屏幕亮度高，但没有相对应的高对比度。定位足够准确，可以日常使用。考虑到它的价格等级，Note 9S整体上相当强大。它在负载下不会过热，并在撰写本文时提供了最新的Android系统。

总体而言，Redmi Note 9S以低廉的价格提供了出色的功能，因此值得我们全力推荐。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S - 2020-05-19 05/19/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis

82%

Keyboard

65 / 75 → 87%

Pointing Device

96%

Connectivity

44 / 70 → 63%

Weight

88%

Battery

92%

Display

85%

Games Performance

29 / 64 → 46%

Application Performance

69 / 86 → 80%

Temperature

88%

Noise

100%

Audio

72 / 90 → 80%

Camera

59%

Average

75%

81%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Finn D Boerne - Translator - 450 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 389263 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 红米Note 9S智能手机评测：大屏低价

Florian Schmitt, 2020-06-26 (Update: 2020-06-26)

红米Note 9S智能手机评测：大屏低价

Test Group

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S audio analysis

Motorola Moto G8 audio analysis

Pros

Cons

Verdict – A Lot to Offer

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare