Notebookcheck Logo

小米12 Pro评测--搭载骁龙8代的强大高端智能手机

升级了。 小米12 Pro不仅有一个新的设计,而且还有一个完全翻新的相机设置,有三个高能力的50万像素传感器。此外,还有很多现代高端功能。在这篇评论中,我们将探讨为什么仍有改进的余地。
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

由于小米12系列尚未在欧洲上市,而且小米仍然让我们等待,我们正在测试高端系列中的顶级机型的进口版本。小米12 Pro在所有领域都依靠顶级技术,它有各种存储配置。用户可以选择8和12GB的内存以及128或256GB的内部存储。通过microSD卡扩展存储是不可能的。

与其前身相比,特别是相机设置有了一些改进。小米用索尼传感器取代了三星的主传感器,并将超广角和长焦传感器升级为5000万像素的三星传感器。这款智能手机搭载了全新的 高通Snapdragon 8 Gen.这使得它成为首批配备加州顶级SoC的设备之一。同样,该显示屏承诺改进自适应刷新率调节,并提高亮度。

由于小米12 Pro是2022年推出的第一款旗舰机,它的主要竞争对手仍然是前一年的机型。这包括 iPhone 13 Pro Max, 三星Galaxy S21 Ultra,以及 奥普Find X3 Pro.然而,甚至更便宜的智能手机,如 摩托罗拉Edge 20 Pro谷歌Pixel 6都属于与小米新参考智能手机相同的价格类别。

Xiaomi 12 Pro (12 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 3 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) Waipio
Graphics adapter
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5
Display
6.73 inch 20:9, 3200 x 1440 pixel 521 PPI, Capacitive, 10 multi-touch points, 480 Hz touch sampling rate, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus, LTPO, 10 Bit, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 229.5 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer, color spectrum, IR blaster, OTG
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 41, 42), 5G sub6 (band 1, 3, 5, 8, 28a, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.66 x 163.6 x 74.6
Battery
4600 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Sony IMX707, f/1.9, 24 mm, 1/1.28", 1.22 µm, OIS, 7P) + 50 MPix (2x optical zoom, f/1.9, 48 mm, 5P) + 50 MPix (Ultra Wide, 115°, f/2.2, 6P); 8k-Video; Camera2-API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.45, 26 mm, 0.7 µm)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Harmon Kardon, Keyboard: Onscreen, 120W charger, USB cable (Type-A to Type-C), silicon bumper, SIM needle, quick start guide, MIUI 13, 12 Months Warranty, DRM Widevine L1; GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1, E5a), BeiDou (B1, B1C, B2a), QZSS (L1, L5), NacIC (L5), SBAS, fanless
Weight
204 g, Power Supply: 220 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
87.6 %
02/2022
Xiaomi 12 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
204 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.73"3200x1440
86.9 %
10/2021
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
SD 870, Adreno 650
185 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2400x1080
90.4 %
08/2021
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14
227 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.80"3200x1440
90.5 %
10/2021
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15, A15 GPU 5-Core
238 g128 GB NVMe6.70"2778x1284
89.2 %
08/2021
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
234 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.81"3200x1440
88.9 %
03/2021
Oppo Find X3 Pro
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
193 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"3216x1440
小米12 Pro的颜色版本(图片:小米)。
小米12 Pro的颜色版本(图片:小米)。

小米12 Pro有四种不同的颜色。黑色、蓝色和粉红色的机型都配有玻璃背壳,使它们比配有所谓素食皮革的绿色智能手机重了一克。反过来说,绿色版本的厚度为0.5毫米(约0.02英寸),总厚度为8.66毫米(约0.34英寸)。然而,我们测得的厚度为9.1毫米(约0.36英寸),这表明小米可能使用的是圆角边缘的平均值。

摄像头凸起约1.45毫米(约0.06英寸),主要光学元件额外突出1.05毫米(约0.04英寸)。因此,当手机平放在桌子上时,12 Pro的左侧很容易摇晃,如果使用附带的硅胶保险杠,这种情况就更加明显了。

我们对小米智能手机的制造质量非常满意。间隙非常均匀和紧密。材料的选择感觉很好,尽管视觉上有吸引力的人造皮革的触觉让人想起带软化剂的塑料。相比之下,亚光铝框架显得更加优雅。我们期望对我们从角落里扭转的尝试有更大的阻力,小米12 Pro的吱吱嘎嘎声和噼啪声相当多。

缺乏IP认证是令人失望的。虽然塑料SIM卡托盘上有一个橡胶密封,但防水智能手机通常有一个明显更厚的密封。槽盖与边框平齐,但颜色不太匹配。

尺寸比较

165.1 mm 75.6 mm 8.9 mm 227 g164.3 mm 74.6 mm 8.38 mm 234 g163.6 mm 74.6 mm 8.66 mm 204 g163.6 mm 74 mm 8.26 mm 193 g163 mm 76 mm 8 mm 185 g160.8 mm 78.1 mm 7.7 mm 238 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性 - 小米12 Pro只支持USB 2.0

正如预期的那样,小米12 Pro既没有提供耳机插孔,也没有提供microSD卡插槽。然而,我们失望地看到小米仍然依赖一个USB 2.0端口。该标准不仅比竞争对手的USB 3.2解决方案慢得多,而且不支持有线视频输出。仍然支持OTG和系留。

除去FM接收器,小米12 Pro的功能列表相当完整。这包括蓝牙5.2、NFC和一个红外发射器。然而,小米仍然没有整合UWB芯片,这是目前小米手机独有的。 混合4.

顶部:扬声器、麦克风、红外辐射器
顶部:扬声器、麦克风、红外辐射器
左边
左边
右边。音量、电源按钮
右边。音量、电源按钮
底部。扬声器、USB、麦克风、SIM卡插槽
底部。扬声器、USB、麦克风、SIM卡插槽

软件 -Android 12与MIUI 13

小米12 Pro目前运行Android 12和小米自己的MiUI 13出厂版本。由于我们的测试设备是该智能手机的中文版,语言选择受到严重限制,西半球的大多数用户很可能被迫选择英语。

出于类似的原因,GetApps和许多中文应用程序都被预装。键盘布局是非正统的,因此应该很快被GBoard或Swift取代。虽然这与中国市场无关,但小米12 Pro配备了所有必要的谷歌服务,但不包括谷歌游戏商店,后者必须追溯安装。不过,随后,这款智能手机就可以以熟悉的方式使用了。

所谓的 "内容启动器"有点令人讨厌,因为从底部边缘向上滑动后,它会显示一个类似于饲料的东西,由于我们缺乏语言技能,很难确定其目的。值得庆幸的是,它可以被搜索取代,或者从主屏幕设置中完全删除。在这里,应用程序抽屉的粉丝也可以启用他们最喜欢的功能。

小米智能手机还配备了DRM认证。因此,只要你选择的流媒体服务支持12 Pro,受保护的内容就可以高质量地观看。在我们的案例中,Netflix的工作没有任何问题,甚至DolbyVision也支持。

那些希望备份数据的人将得到小米自己的云服务的非常频繁的优惠,尽管使用谷歌硬盘也是可能的。此外,备份可以通过USB从电脑或外部存储介质上创建。当使用有线选项时,旧的USB标准意味着用户将不得不非常耐心。

更新分布有些不清楚。虽然我们在测试时确实收到了更新,但安全补丁仍然可以追溯到2021年12月1日。虽然不应期待每月的补丁,但一个或多个主要版本的升级应该是必然的。到目前为止,小米还没有就此发表明确的声明。

可用的系统语言
可用的系统语言
内容启动器
内容启动器
搜索作为内容启动器的替代品
搜索作为内容启动器的替代品
主屏幕菜单
主屏幕菜单

通信和GNSS - 小米12 Pro无LTE频段20

小米12 Pro配备了理论上最强大的调制解调器之一:骁龙X65 5G调制解调器-射频系统。然而,快速浏览一下规格表,就这个价格范围而言,支持的频段范围相当小,而且只支持6级以下的5G。值得注意的是,LTE频段列表中缺少20频段,这对欧洲的用户来说主要是很重要的。在大都市,这不太可能成为一个问题,我们在大城市测试时没有遇到任何限制,尽管这在农村地区可能很快会改变。即将推出的国际版不太可能受到这一缺点的影响。

在Wi-Fi方面,小米智能手机支持目前所有的IEEE-802.11标准,包括最新的Wi-Fi 6E。然而,我们发现无法连接到我们的参考路由器华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000的6GHz频段,这大概是源于不支持新的欧洲6E规范。在Wi-Fi 6网络内,小米12 Pro达到了很高的传输速度,在接收数据时特别稳定。虽然在传输数据时,速度没有那么稳定,但在日常工作中,这一点并不明显,它们仍然很快。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1281 (635min - 1400max) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1190 (1121min - 1230max) MBit/s ∼93%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
875 (836min - 889max) MBit/s ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
803 (437min - 889max) MBit/s ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
633 (523min - 703max) MBit/s ∼49%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
655 (597min - 675max) MBit/s ∼51%
Average of class Smartphone
  (16.9 - 1368, n=132, last 2 years)
507 MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 receive AX12
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
922 (904min - 928max) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
169 (156min - 180max) MBit/s ∼18%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
779 (363min - 824max) MBit/s ∼84%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
731 (565min - 819max) MBit/s ∼79%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
718 (707min - 724max) MBit/s ∼78%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
697 (500min - 767max) MBit/s ∼76%
Average of class Smartphone
  (31.1 - 953, n=133, last 2 years)
479 MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1569 (1493min - 1651max) MBit/s ∼100% +29%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1214 (516min - 1524max) MBit/s ∼77%
Average of class Smartphone
  (57.7 - 1710, n=123, last 2 years)
648 MBit/s ∼41% -47%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1465 (1307min - 1536max) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1352 (1210min - 1436max) MBit/s ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (44.3 - 1736, n=121, last 2 years)
601 MBit/s ∼41% -59%
0801602403204004805606407208008809601040112012001280136014401520Tooltip
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1463 (1307-1536)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 660; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø767 (363-824)
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1197 (516-1524)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 660; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1190 (1121-1230)
GPS测试。室外
GPS测试。室外
GPS测试:室内
GPS测试:室内
GPS测试。全球导航卫星系统网络利用率
GPS测试。全球导航卫星系统网络利用率

在GNSS支持方面,小米12 Pro在GPS、Glonass、BeiDou、QZSS、NaIC和SBAS等所有可用频率上大放异彩。卫星上行链路几乎立即建立,而且精度很高。虽然同样的过程在室内需要稍长的时间,但精度仍然很高。

小米智能手机的竞争者是 Garmin Venu 2在我们的小型自行车骑行中与Garmin Venu 2智能手表竞争。在我们总长度超过5公里(约3英里)的测试赛道末端,两台设备之间只有90米(约295英尺)的距离。仔细观察赛道的详细进程,发现它们在绕湖一周时非常接近,在转弯处两个追踪器在不同地方有偏差。对于日常使用,12 Pro应该提供非常可靠的导航能力,同时也很适合其他定位任务。

GNSS测试轨道。绕湖而行
GNSS测试轨道。绕湖而行
全球导航卫星系统测试轨道。转折点
全球导航卫星系统测试轨道。转折点
全球导航卫星系统测试轨道。摘要
全球导航卫星系统测试轨道。摘要

电话和通话质量

小米12 Pro提供功能齐全的双卡,有两张nano SIM卡,不支持eSIM。只能使用小米自己的小米SIM卡,它只在中国使用。支持VoLTE和Wi-Fi通话,而SIP账户管理还没有被整合到系统中。

由于是中文软件版本,通话记录器被整合到电话应用中,并带有人工智能功能,但只在中文中可用。语音质量是令人失望的。虽然用户在任何时候都能听懂,但声音听起来很沉闷,而且经常伴有小的电子噪音和偶尔的中断。在开始时,经常有回声,随着时间的推移而逐渐消失。有一个噪音消除功能,虽然它至少可以减弱背景噪音,即使在嘈杂的环境中也可以通话,但使用12 Pro的人的声音往往会被切断,偶尔甚至会被完全抑制。

免提电话的声音在安静的环境中是足够大的。虽然在免提模式下,用户捕捉到的声音也听起来有些沉闷,并伴随着安静的静态噪音,但即使在离手机2米(约6.5英尺)远的地方,通话质量仍然保持一致。

相机 - 小米12 Pro的182MPix像素

与小米12 Pro的自拍
自拍。照片模式
与小米12 Pro的自拍
自拍。自拍
前置摄像头设置
设置

小米12 Pro的前置摄像头的分辨率为32MP(传感器:OmniVision OV32B40),可用于覆盖整个屏幕的照片,或长宽比为4:3或16:9的照片。因此,照片的细节很丰富,看起来很吸引人。虽然美颜模式默认是启用的,但它可以根据你的喜好进行调整,或从设置中完全禁用。此外,可以选择几种所谓的电影效果。使用人像模式可以实现体面的虚化效果,然而,HDR在这种模式下是不可用的。

视频可以以高达全高清(1920 x 1080像素)和每秒60帧的速度录制,还有一个可选的自动字幕功能,在我们的测试中,这个功能是令人沮丧的。

主要摄像机

背面的三个传感器的分辨率都是50MP。然而,只有主摄像头依靠索尼IMX707(像素大小:1.22微米),而另外两个传感器各自使用一个小得多的三星S5KJN1(像素大小:0.64微米)。

虽然主传感器在纸面上应该表现良好,但小米夸大了对比度和锐度,这导致图片略微太暗,动态范围受到不必要的限制。这可能是由于亚洲市场的偏好,因为颜色普遍过饱和,尤其是绿色调几乎似乎要跳出屏幕。更好的结果可能可以通过GCam应用程序或其他相机应用程序来实现,即将发布的国际版本也很可能遵循一种更平衡的方法。

超广角传感器的表现令人印象深刻。翘曲的镜头得到了适当的补偿,即使靠近边缘也没有色差。由于分辨率高,景深也很好。在这里,微距模式本可以成为顶部的樱桃。

2倍光学变焦完成了小米12 Pro的相机三重奏。不幸的是,与主摄像头不同,这个摄像头不提供光学图像稳定(OIS)。因此,照片在白天的时候效果很好,在更高的变焦水平上很快就变得模糊了。虽然20倍数码变焦在数据表上看起来不错,但由于它在实践中产生的低质量结果,它可能不会看到很多用途。

专业模式允许手动定制设置和RAW格式的照片。

视频模式允许以8K的分辨率进行录制,尽管它们被限制在每秒24帧,最大长度为6分钟。只有主摄像头可以在这种分辨率下使用,但至少录制的内容支持HDR10。

坚持使用超高清的用户可以使用所有三个光学器件,在30和60FPS之间选择,并有HDR10+选项。然而,在录像时不可能在摄像机之间切换。希望利用特别稳定的稳定器的用户被限制在1080p,固定的30FPS。较低的高清分辨率也是可用的,但它也被限制在30 FPS。不幸的是,只有8K视频可以在24p下录制。目前还不清楚为什么小米在较低的分辨率下省略了这种模式。

专业模式也可用于视频录制,其结构与摄影模式类似,有一个额外的直方图和麦克风水平。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraHauptkameraUltraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLow-Light
click to load images

在受控的照明条件下,小米12 Pro设法以高度的清晰度捕捉我们的测试图表。在这里,与日常场景相比,该智能手机的对比度特征要温和得多。

在某些情况下,12 Pro在色彩方面出现了偏差,可能会出现非常过饱和的现象。因此,深绿色的deltaE达到24以上--这与自然的色彩再现相去甚远。尽管色彩平衡也略微过暖,但我们对它非常满意。

ColorChecker
20.7 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
10 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
19.9 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 12 Pro: 12.17 ∆E min: 3.48 - max: 24.4 ∆E
ColorChecker
13.8 ∆E
9 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
11 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
19.7 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 12 Pro: 13.48 ∆E min: 8.85 - max: 22.18 ∆E

配件和保修

小米提供12个月的保修期,与制造商的保修期没有任何关系。 制造商的保修.不提供额外的服务计划或延长保修期。

小米12 Pro的供货范围包括一个模块化的120瓦充电器,一条兼容的USB线(A型到C型),一个SIM卡工具和一个透明的硅胶保险套。制造商不提供任何额外的配件,尽管有各种第三方的保护套可供选择。

输入设备和处理 - 快速指纹传感器和480赫兹

小米12 Pro的电容式触摸屏有能力同时识别多达10个输入,有480赫兹的高采样率,并有坚固的康宁大猩猩玻璃Victus的保护。一个相当厚的屏幕保护膜在出厂前就已经预装好了,它的边缘在外部界限上感觉有些硬。虽然滑行性能仍然很好,但没有屏幕保护膜,用户体验明显更舒适。无论哪种方式,输入感觉都很可靠,反应灵敏。

小米预装的中文键盘应该很快被替换成你在游戏商店中选择的布局。与国际版本相比,所有其他差异都相当小。

小米将指纹传感器隐藏在显示屏下面。虽然它只是一个光学传感器,但在我们的测试中,它工作得非常可靠,并迅速从待机状态下解锁我们的智能手机。另外,或在此基础上,还提供了一个面部识别,感觉甚至快了一小段。随着MIUI 13的推出,小米承诺将采用更多的机器学习算法,以提高前置摄像头的2D面部识别的安全性。

显示屏 - 明亮、准确,最高可达120赫兹

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

小米12 Pro采用6.73英寸(17.09厘米,109.35平方厘米)的AMOLED显示屏,最大分辨率为3200 x 1440像素(WQHD+),像素密度高达521PPI。然而,这必须在设置菜单中手动启用,因为较小的全高清+分辨率(2400 x 1080像素,391 PPI)是默认设置。当选择较高的分辨率时,用户还可以选择让系统自动调整iT,以延长电池寿命。

系统会自适应地将LTPO 2.0面板的刷新率控制在10和120赫兹的范围内。另外,用户也可以设置60、90或120赫兹的固定刷新率。只有在启用环境光传感器的情况下才能达到最大亮度,该传感器在我们的测试中能迅速适应新的照明条件。

当显示纯白色图像时,AMOLED面板在中央达到959尼特。在显示亮区和暗区均匀分布的情况下,亮度在APL50中攀升到1279尼特,在APL25中达到1356尼特,在APL10中达到1377尼特。这仍然使小米的亮度低于其宣传的最大亮度(1500尼特)。手动设置亮度的上限只有479尼特。

像所有的OLED一样,小米12 Pro也持续闪烁。在最低亮度下,我们测量的频率在181.2和367.6赫兹之间。随着亮度的增加,振幅和波长都会减少。防闪烁模式只能通过开发者选项访问,而不是标准操作系统的一部分。

此外,船上有一个蓝光过滤器(阅读模式),允许调整显示的色温和预定激活。该面板支持所有常见的HDR标准。HLG、HDR10、HDR10+和DolbyVision。

970
cd/m²
960
cd/m²
993
cd/m²
966
cd/m²
959
cd/m²
991
cd/m²
975
cd/m²
979
cd/m²
998
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 998 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 976.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2.48 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 959 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.2
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.5
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Xiaomi 12 Pro
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.73
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3200x1440, 6.80
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
OLED, 2778x1284, 6.70
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.81
Oppo Find X3 Pro
AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.70
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.70
Screen
-18%
25%
-12%
7%
-13%
Brightness middle
959
910
-5%
1049
9%
891
-7%
759
-21%
666
-31%
Brightness
977
913
-7%
1060
8%
888
-9%
776
-21%
644
-34%
Brightness Distribution
96
98
2%
98
2%
99
3%
94
-2%
93
-3%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.1
2
-82%
0.78
29%
1.9
-73%
0.8
27%
1.4
-27%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.1
3.1
-0%
1.72
45%
3.7
-19%
1.8
42%
2.65
15%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.9
2.2
-16%
0.8
58%
1.3
32%
1.6
16%
1.9
-0%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2.06 107%
2.181 101%
2.3 96%
2.23 99%
2.209 100%
CCT
6498 100%
6512 100%
6559 99%
6527 100%
6512 100%
6646 98%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 367.6 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 367.6 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 367.6 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19466 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

我们使用我们的分光光度计和分析软件CalMAN分析了色彩深度为10比特的AMOLED面板的准确性。小米12 Pro在 "自然 "模式下达到了最准确的图像,该模式使用相对较小的sRGB色彩空间。在这里,deltaE的偏差是最小的,色彩平衡几乎是理想的。

而 "鲜艳 "模式使用更大的DCI-P3色彩空间,其色温更冷,色彩饱和度更高。

灰度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)。
颜色(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)。
色彩空间(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)。
饱和度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)。
灰度(配置文件:鲜艳,目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)
灰度(配置文件:鲜艳,目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)
颜色(配置文件:鲜艳,目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)。
颜色(配置文件:鲜艳,目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)。
色彩空间(配置文件:生动,目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)。
色彩空间(配置文件:生动,目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)。
饱和度(配置文件:鲜艳,目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)。
饱和度(配置文件:鲜艳,目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
7.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.6 ms rise
↘ 3.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (35.8 ms).

小米12 Pro为户外使用提供了良好的装备。它不会受到严重的眩光影响,而且有很多亮度储备。

正如我们将在本评论的后面部分看到的,散热不良可能导致系统调暗面板,以防止过热。

正如预期的那样,AMOLED显示屏的可视角度非常好。只有在极端角度下才能观察到明显的亮度下降和青色色调。

小米12 Pro的可视角度
小米12 Pro的可视角度

性能--小米12 Pro的Snapdragon 8 Gen.

小米12 Pro是市场上第一款配备高通2022年顶级SoC的智能手机 骁龙8代1.根据不同的型号,小米将其与8GB或(如我们的测试型号)12GB的LPDDR5内存搭配。小米的 Adreno 730作为集成图形单元。

与芯片组的前身相比,原始的CPU性能只是略有增加,小米12 Pro在Geekbench中略微落后于高通的参考设计。GPU性能不应该是这种情况,基于Vulkan API的应用程序可望从比Adreno 660的改进中大大受益。 Adreno 660内的Adreno 660的改进而大大受益。 骁龙888.我们的测试结果证实了这一点,3DMark图形测试显示了13%至83%的领先优势,较小的改进属于使用旧版OpenGL ES接口的场景。

GFXBench描绘了类似的画面。然而,小米12 Pro在这个基准测试中并没有达到其真正的潜力。特别是GFXBench的最新测试场景(Aztec Ruins)显示参考设计的速度高达44%,这很可能源于小米12 Pro的冷却效果不佳。

Geekbench 5.4
Single-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1192 Points ∼68%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Reference
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1237 Points ∼71% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
1106 Points ∼63% -7%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1742 Points ∼100% +46%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
974 Points ∼56% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
989 Points ∼57% -17%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1123 Points ∼64% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (1181 - 1298, n=21)
1231 Points ∼71% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1885, n=264, last 2 years)
759 Points ∼44% -36%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3738 Points ∼76%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Reference
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
3839 Points ∼78% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
3583 Points ∼73% -4%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
4914 Points ∼100% +31%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
2986 Points ∼61% -20%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
3462 Points ∼70% -7%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
3535 Points ∼72% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (3269 - 3839, n=21)
3548 Points ∼72% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (291 - 5538, n=264, last 2 years)
2445 Points ∼50% -35%
Vulkan Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
Points ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
6252 Points ∼98%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
3159 Points ∼49%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4287 Points ∼67%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4415 Points ∼69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (5157 - 8462, n=16)
6389 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (79 - 9065, n=203, last 2 years)
3119 Points ∼49%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
Points ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
7400 Points ∼100%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
3482 Points ∼47%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4599 Points ∼62%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4656 Points ∼63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (5820 - 6291, n=16)
5985 Points ∼81%
Average of class Smartphone
  (261 - 9069, n=199, last 2 years)
2880 Points ∼39%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10958 Points ∼90%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Reference
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
12119 Points ∼100% +11%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
9245 Points ∼76% -16%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
8768 Points ∼72% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (6784 - 13121, n=17)
10889 Points ∼90% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 18846, n=196, last 2 years)
5772 Points ∼48% -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
20842 Points ∼80%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Reference
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
26049 Points ∼100% +25%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
13273 Points ∼51% -36%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
13647 Points ∼52% -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (15268 - 26049, n=17)
22365 Points ∼86% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 36343, n=195, last 2 years)
8728 Points ∼34% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4120 Points ∼92%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Reference
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
4220 Points ∼94% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
4483 Points ∼100% +9%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
3895 Points ∼87% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (2237 - 4811, n=17)
3942 Points ∼88% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (651 - 7019, n=194, last 2 years)
3437 Points ∼77% -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
9149 Points ∼85%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Reference
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
10726 Points ∼100% +17%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
8345 Points ∼78% -9%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
5782 Points ∼54% -37%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
9540 Points ∼89% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (5983 - 11528, n=16)
9675 Points ∼90% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 16067, n=227, last 2 years)
4613 Points ∼43% -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13950 Points ∼72%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Reference
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
19392 Points ∼100% +39%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
10794 Points ∼56% -23%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
16202 Points ∼84% +16%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
12394 Points ∼64% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (11082 - 19392, n=16)
16625 Points ∼86% +19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 25350, n=226, last 2 years)
6139 Points ∼32% -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4150 Points ∼79%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Reference
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
4183 Points ∼79% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
4651 Points ∼88% +12%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1902 Points ∼36% -54%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5283 Points ∼100% +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (2283 - 4771, n=16)
3965 Points ∼75% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (635 - 7042, n=226, last 2 years)
3400 Points ∼64% -18%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
9927 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
5756 Points ∼58% -42%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
9680 Points ∼98% -2%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
4274 Points ∼43% -57%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5689 Points ∼57% -43%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5657 Points ∼57% -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (6351 - 10062, n=14)
9091 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (254 - 10062, n=201, last 2 years)
3160 Points ∼32% -68%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10384 Points ∼89%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Reference
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
10412 Points ∼89% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
5873 Points ∼50% -43%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
11688 Points ∼100% +13%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
4233 Points ∼36% -59%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5734 Points ∼49% -45%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5721 Points ∼49% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (6483 - 10412, n=20)
9608 Points ∼82% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (247 - 14002, n=224, last 2 years)
4181 Points ∼36% -60%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2609 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
1871 Points ∼61% -28%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
3080 Points ∼100% +18%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
1243 Points ∼40% -52%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1552 Points ∼50% -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (1629 - 2639, n=20)
2470 Points ∼80% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 3751, n=206, last 2 years)
1138 Points ∼37% -56%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2513 Points ∼89%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Reference
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
2577 Points ∼91% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
1758 Points ∼62% -30%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
2817 Points ∼100% +12%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
1223 Points ∼43% -51%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1498 Points ∼53% -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (1567 - 2585, n=21)
2386 Points ∼85% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (101 - 3707, n=198, last 2 years)
1137 Points ∼40% -55%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
121 fps ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
104 fps ∼73% -14%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
60 fps ∼42% -50%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
142 fps ∼100% +17%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
120 fps ∼85% -1%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
60 fps ∼42% -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (60 - 121, n=16)
99.8 fps ∼70% -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.5 - 165, n=194, last 2 years)
77 fps ∼54% -36%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
425 fps ∼94%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Reference
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
450 fps ∼100% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
154 fps ∼34% -64%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
409.6 fps ∼91% -4%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
223 fps ∼50% -48%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
281 fps ∼62% -34%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
230 fps ∼51% -46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (245 - 450, n=17)
361 fps ∼80% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 462, n=194, last 2 years)
176.3 fps ∼39% -59%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
117 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
69 fps ∼59% -41%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
60 fps ∼51% -49%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
116 fps ∼99% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
98 fps ∼84% -16%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
55 fps ∼47% -53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (60 - 121, n=16)
89.4 fps ∼76% -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 161, n=195, last 2 years)
64.3 fps ∼55% -45%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
251 fps ∼95%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Reference
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
265 fps ∼100% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
117 fps ∼44% -53%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
227.9 fps ∼86% -9%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
132 fps ∼50% -47%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
177 fps ∼67% -29%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
127 fps ∼48% -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (141 - 265, n=17)
190 fps ∼72% -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.4 - 292, n=196, last 2 years)
99.7 fps ∼38% -60%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
87 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
51 fps ∼59% -41%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
60 fps ∼69% -31%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
80 fps ∼92% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
62 fps ∼71% -29%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
36 fps ∼41% -59%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (50 - 121, n=16)
77.9 fps ∼90% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 136, n=196, last 2 years)
50.7 fps ∼58% -42%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
169 fps ∼97%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Reference
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
175 fps ∼100% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
74 fps ∼42% -56%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
144 fps ∼82% -15%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
91 fps ∼52% -46%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
121 fps ∼69% -28%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
93 fps ∼53% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (95 - 175, n=17)
130.5 fps ∼75% -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 197, n=196, last 2 years)
67.7 fps ∼39% -60%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
36 fps ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
30 fps ∼56% -17%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
53.2 fps ∼100% +48%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
50 fps ∼94% +39%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
35 fps ∼66% -3%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
28 fps ∼53% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (28 - 81, n=16)
51 fps ∼96% +42%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 93, n=195, last 2 years)
33.3 fps ∼63% -7%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
71 fps ∼72%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Reference
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
98 fps ∼100% +38%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
58 fps ∼59% -18%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
92.9 fps ∼95% +31%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
58 fps ∼59% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
71 fps ∼72% 0%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
55 fps ∼56% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (50 - 98, n=17)
74.6 fps ∼76% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.9 - 114, n=195, last 2 years)
41 fps ∼42% -42%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
44 fps ∼74%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
37 fps ∼62% -16%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
59.1 fps ∼99% +34%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
49 fps ∼82% +11%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
44 fps ∼74% 0%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
38 fps ∼64% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (38 - 98, n=20)
59.6 fps ∼100% +35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 113, n=260, last 2 years)
34 fps ∼57% -23%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
92 fps ∼70%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Reference
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
131 fps ∼100% +42%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Reference
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
130 fps ∼99% +41%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
69 fps ∼53% -25%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
108 fps ∼82% +17%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
57 fps ∼44% -38%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
85 fps ∼65% -8%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
72 fps ∼55% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (60 - 131, n=22)
95.6 fps ∼73% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.9 - 142, n=261, last 2 years)
42.1 fps ∼32% -54%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
27 fps ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
26 fps ∼47% -4%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
54.8 fps ∼100% +103%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
31 fps ∼57% +15%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
26 fps ∼47% -4%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
25 fps ∼46% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (27 - 69, n=20)
45.3 fps ∼83% +68%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.8 - 86, n=261, last 2 years)
24 fps ∼44% -11%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
34 fps ∼69%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Reference
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
49 fps ∼100% +44%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Reference
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
43 fps ∼88% +26%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
28 fps ∼57% -18%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
37.9 fps ∼77% +11%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
22 fps ∼45% -35%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
30 fps ∼61% -12%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
28 fps ∼57% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (19 - 49, n=22)
37.6 fps ∼77% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.7 - 56, n=261, last 2 years)
16.1 fps ∼33% -53%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2293 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
2703 Points ∼100% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (2293 - 2663, n=2)
2478 Points ∼92% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (177 - 5296, n=57, last 2 years)
1711 Points ∼63% -25%

虽然小米12 Pro在系统基准测试中表现良好,但它仍然没有完全达到我们的预期。例如,在安兔兔中,它确保了对其竞争对手的大幅领先,但没有设法跳到七位数的分数。在PCMark中,它落后于参考设计23%。这部分是由于MIUI,部分是由于SoC的热开发。我们在日常使用中的主观印象与这些结果相吻合,因为即使在浏览系统的菜单时,也可以观察到微小的卡顿。

在人工智能加速方面,12 Pro做得非常好,以很大的优势超过了所有竞争对手。

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Reference
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1003590 Points ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
962824 Points ∼96%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
815441 Points ∼81% -15%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
801983 Points ∼80% -17%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
800222 Points ∼80% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
749520 Points ∼75% -22%
Google Pixel 6
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
702981 Points ∼70% -27%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
692521 Points ∼69% -28%
CrossMark
Overall
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
990 Points ∼100% +22%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
972 Points ∼98% +20%
Google Pixel 6
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
849 Points ∼86% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
846 Points ∼85% +4%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
829 Points ∼84% +2%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
811 Points ∼82%
Productivity
Asus ROG Phone 5
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
994 Points ∼100% +34%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
974 Points ∼98% +31%
Google Pixel 6
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
866 Points ∼87% +17%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
852 Points ∼86% +15%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
800 Points ∼80% +8%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
741 Points ∼75%
Creativity
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
970 Points ∼100% +10%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
906 Points ∼93% +3%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
878 Points ∼91%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
829 Points ∼85% -6%
Google Pixel 6
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
825 Points ∼85% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
824 Points ∼85% -6%
Responsiveness
Asus ROG Phone 5
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1126 Points ∼100% +34%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1102 Points ∼98% +31%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
918 Points ∼82% +9%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
897 Points ∼80% +7%
Google Pixel 6
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
867 Points ∼77% +3%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
840 Points ∼75%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Reference
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
17025 Points ∼100% +30%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16391 Points ∼96% +25%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14339 Points ∼84% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13982 Points ∼82% +6%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13131 Points ∼77%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11986 Points ∼70% -9%
Google Pixel 6
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10409 Points ∼61% -21%
UL Procyon AI Inference - Overall Score
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63613 Points ∼100%
Google Pixel 6
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28581 Points ∼45% -55%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19592 Points ∼31% -69%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
17835 Points ∼28% -72%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5725 Points ∼9% -91%
AImark - Score v2.x
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
262983 Points ∼100% +262%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
241222 Points ∼92% +232%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
171404 Points ∼65% +136%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
107460 Points ∼41% +48%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Reference
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
96317 Points ∼37% +33%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
72572 Points ∼28%
Google Pixel 6
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5723 Points ∼2% -92%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points ∼0% -100%

正如预期的那样,小米12 Pro的浏览器性能很快,浏览网页感觉非常灵敏,尽管它在我们的基准测试中没有打破任何记录。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)
181.8 Points ∼100% +116%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (72.8 - 134.6, n=16)
107.9 Points ∼59% +28%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra (Chrome91)
94.3 Points ∼52% +12%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro (Chrome 94)
93.7 Points ∼52% +11%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
84.1 Points ∼46%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (Chrome 88)
76.6 Points ∼42% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (14.8 - 282, n=172, last 2 years)
76.4 Points ∼42% -9%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)
402.9 Points ∼100% +173%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (121.9 - 237, n=11)
195.6 Points ∼49% +33%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro (Chrome 94)
170.6 Points ∼42% +16%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra (Chrome91)
160.9 Points ∼40% +9%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
147.5 Points ∼37%
Oppo Find X3 Pro (Chrome 89)
139.4 Points ∼35% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (Chrome 88)
127.3 Points ∼32% -14%
Average of class Smartphone (21.9 - 414, n=117, last 2 years)
123.2 Points ∼31% -16%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)
242 runs/min ∼100% +229%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (64.4 - 129.3, n=16)
104 runs/min ∼43% +41%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra (Chrome91)
98 runs/min ∼40% +33%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (Chrome 88)
84.1 runs/min ∼35% +14%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
73.5 runs/min ∼30%
Average of class Smartphone (12.8 - 375, n=160, last 2 years)
72.6 runs/min ∼30% -1%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro (Chrome 94)
71.9 runs/min ∼30% -2%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)
248 Points ∼100% +108%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (79 - 193, n=15)
142.9 Points ∼58% +20%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra (Chrome91)
141 Points ∼57% +18%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (Chrome 88)
132 Points ∼53% +11%
Oppo Find X3 Pro (Chrome 89)
129 Points ∼52% +8%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro (Chrome 94)
127 Points ∼51% +7%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
119 Points ∼48%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 292, n=171, last 2 years)
104.1 Points ∼42% -13%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)
63831 Points ∼100% +115%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (27730 - 50626, n=17)
42391 Points ∼66% +42%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro (Chrome 94)
39985 Points ∼63% +34%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra (Chrome91)
33423 Points ∼52% +12%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
29750 Points ∼47%
Oppo Find X3 Pro (Chrome 89)
27914 Points ∼44% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (3905 - 74261, n=197, last 2 years)
27455 Points ∼43% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (Chrome 88)
27275 Points ∼43% -8%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 12437, n=182, last 2 years)
2419 ms * ∼100% -82%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (Chrome 88)
1786 ms * ∼74% -34%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra (Chrome91)
1782 ms * ∼74% -34%
Oppo Find X3 Pro (Chrome 89)
1646 ms * ∼68% -24%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
1330 ms * ∼55%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro (Chrome 94)
1176 ms * ∼49% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (814 - 1440, n=16)
1010 ms * ∼42% +24%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)
414.8 ms * ∼17% +69%
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (Chrome 88)
313.2 ms * ∼100% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
303 ms * ∼97% -0%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
302.5 ms * ∼97%
Average of class Smartphone (55.7 - 619, n=13, last 2 years)
301 ms * ∼96% -0%

* ... smaller is better

小米12 Pro内部的UFS 3.1存储的速度快得惊人,几乎在所有领域都有明显的改进,尽管它没有打破连续读取的记录,但在日常使用中这一点并不明显。

Xiaomi 12 ProMotorola Edge 20 ProSamsung Galaxy S21 UltraXiaomi Mi 11 UltraOppo Find X3 ProAverage 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-33%
-15%
-19%
-24%
-16%
-48%
Sequential Read 256KB
1620
1699
5%
1710
6%
1928
19%
1779
10%
1777 ?(1014 - 2037, n=68)
10%
1040 ?(90.5 - 3557, n=256, last 2 years)
-36%
Sequential Write 256KB
1465
723
-51%
1077
-26%
756
-48%
759
-48%
1070 ?(452 - 1833, n=68)
-27%
611 ?(11.9 - 2723, n=256, last 2 years)
-58%
Random Read 4KB
324.9
245.7
-24%
316.7
-3%
259.3
-20%
273.3
-16%
277 ?(173.5 - 543, n=68)
-15%
190.1 ?(13.5 - 543, n=256, last 2 years)
-41%
Random Write 4KB
448.9
179.6
-60%
279.5
-38%
329.7
-27%
267.1
-40%
300 ?(197.5 - 490, n=69)
-33%
194.5 ?(13 - 552, n=257, last 2 years)
-57%

游戏--不良的冷却效果玷污了游戏体验

ǞǞǞ 阿德雷诺730小米12 Pro内部的Adreno 730理论上应该是Android 智能手机中最强大的图形单元之一。特别是Vulkan性能得到了巨大的改善,HFR游戏应该可以不受任何限制。

不幸的是,我们GameBench对三款游戏的分析显示,12 Pro并没有设法满足这些期望。虽然PUBG Mobile在超高清下的帧率保持在稳定的40 FPS,但较低的细节设置和较高的帧率显示出帧数下降,可以看到卡顿的现象。

Genshiin Impact中也可以观察到类似的行为,尽管最大帧率不是很高,只有35 FPS。在这种情况下,一个 Galaxy S21 Ultra通常可以管理超过55FPS的帧率。即使在较低的预设下,小米12 Pro以60 FPS开始,但在短时间内就会下降到35 FPS,偶尔会出现卡顿。

虽然Wild Rift运行得很好,但小米手机最多只支持60 FPS,而且不能从设置菜单中选择90甚至120帧/秒。在这里 Galaxy S21 FE处于优势地位,在120FPS下的游戏无卡顿。

英雄联盟。野生裂缝
英雄联盟。野生裂缝
PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
玄信影响
玄信影响
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Xiaomi 12 Pro; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 2.4.0_5199000_5224067: Ø42.2 (21-61)
Xiaomi 12 Pro; Genshin Impact; medium 120 fps; 2.4.0_5199000_5224067: Ø34.4 (25-36)
Xiaomi 12 Pro; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 2.4.0_5199000_5224067: Ø33 (22-36)
Xiaomi 12 Pro; League of Legends: Wild Rift; 3.0.0.5295: Ø60.7 (60-61)
Xiaomi 12 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 1.8.0: Ø56.6 (44-61)
Xiaomi 12 Pro; PUBG Mobile; HD; 1.8.0: Ø56.6 (45-61)
Xiaomi 12 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 1.8.0: Ø39.8 (36-41)

排放--感官的交响乐

温度

在3DMark Wild Life Extreme压力测试初期就有过热的风险
过热的风险

闲置时,小米12 Pro的表面温度保持舒适的低水平。在长时间的负载下,温度如预期般上升,尽管热量分布非常均匀,温度仍然没有明显超过体温。

智能手机的内部结构也不能这么说。被吹捧为大型的冷却解决方案并不能很好地处理热量的发展。在3DMark的压力测试中,12 Pro显示出明显的性能下降,可能会影响日常使用中的性能,与我们对游戏基准的观察相吻合。该系统甚至不得不中止压力测试Wild Life Extreme,以防止其过热(见截图)。这也暗示了在温暖的夏天的限制。

虽然我们能够运行GFXBench电池测试,但试图访问结果会导致应用程序崩溃,这就是为什么它们没有在这里列出。

Max. Load
 36 °C36.5 °C37.6 °C 
 36.1 °C36.7 °C36.7 °C 
 36 °C36.1 °C34.6 °C 
Maximum: 37.6 °C
Average: 36.3 °C
34.6 °C35.5 °C36.4 °C
33.2 °C34.7 °C37 °C
32.9 °C33.8 °C35.8 °C
Maximum: 37 °C
Average: 34.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  27.4 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.3 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.1 (12.3-16)
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø37.8 (27.4-58)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø47 (44.5-55.5)
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø49.5 (34.8-61.7)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Reference Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø51.1 (47.4-62.5)

发言人

小米12 Pro的两个立体声扬声器经过哈曼卡顿的优化,它们给人留下了非常好的印象。对于智能手机来说,声音是相对平衡的,甚至听起来相当丰富,因为即使是高低音频率也被包括在内。

另外,耳机可以通过USB-C接口连接,也可以通过蓝牙无线连接。小米已经全力以赴,有SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX Adaptive、AptX TWS+、LDAC和LDHC(1至4版本),所有既定标准都在其中。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.233.42521.727.83118.627.94021.721.3503230.86325.727.98027.424.410024.336.812516.345.216018.951.720017.547.225012.35631515.757.940011.658.550011.866.563012.468.780011.672.3100012.574.1125013.172.2160012.571.4200013.171.9250012.871.4315012.877.2400012.971.7500013.367.7630013.472.8800013.767.91000013.7681250014.4671600013.759.1SPL25.284.2N0.759.9median 13.1median 67.9Delta1.57.730.825.822.62619.223.721.424.132.83618.624.218.123.715.427.710.739.41756.114.954.313.25812.562.311.565.710.566.89.968.311.971.110.676.213.676.81471.212.972.511.773.512.978.913.180.113.377.113.873.21479.513.574.414.272.51763.425880.675median 13.2median 71.21.27.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi 12 ProSamsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi 12 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

能源管理--小米12 Pro配备4600毫安时

能源消耗

小米12 Pro的耗电量已经得到改善,尽管屏幕有自适应刷新率,但在空转时,最低亮度也只是有些高。

4600毫安时的电池可以在短短24分钟内用附带的120瓦充电器完全充电,或者在15分钟内将电池充电到75%。此外,小米智能手机支持高达50瓦的无线充电和高达10瓦的反向无线充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.009 / 0.24 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.94 / 1.24 / 1.34 Watt
Load midlight 5.7 / 8.12 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Xiaomi 12 Pro
4600 mAh
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
5000 mAh
Oppo Find X3 Pro
4500 mAh
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
4352 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
23%
-9%
-19%
-16%
15%
-33%
-3%
Idle Minimum *
0.94
0.7
26%
1.06
-13%
1.13
-20%
0.93
1%
0.6
36%
1.255 ?(0.7 - 3.18, n=15)
-34%
0.888 ?(0.12 - 2.5, n=189, last 2 years)
6%
Idle Average *
1.24
0.9
27%
1.19
4%
1.67
-35%
1.54
-24%
1.5
-21%
2.02 ?(1.04 - 4.38, n=15)
-63%
1.559 ?(0.65 - 3.6, n=189, last 2 years)
-26%
Idle Maximum *
1.34
1.2
10%
1.2
10%
1.69
-26%
1.69
-26%
1.6
-19%
2.21 ?(1.15 - 4.45, n=15)
-65%
1.77 ?(0.69 - 3.7, n=189, last 2 years)
-32%
Load Average *
5.7
4.6
19%
6.46
-13%
5.17
9%
6.38
-12%
3.5
39%
5.49 ?(3.58 - 8.04, n=15)
4%
4.36 ?(2.1 - 7.74, n=189, last 2 years)
24%
Load Maximum *
8.12
5.5
32%
10.76
-33%
9.9
-22%
9.58
-18%
4.8
41%
8.75 ?(6.67 - 11.3, n=15)
-8%
7.22 ?(3.56 - 11.9, n=189, last 2 years)
11%

* ... smaller is better

Energy Consumption: Geekbench (150 nits)

0123456789101112Tooltip
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1: Ø6.81 (1.309-12.9)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G: Ø5.28 (1.358-11.1)

Energy Consumption: GFXBench (150 nits)

012345678910