小米Redmi Note 12S 智能手机评测：轻巧、廉价、OLED 屏幕

Name: Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Brand: Xiaomi

苗条纤细。 Redmi Note 12S 是一款配备 6.43 英寸屏幕的紧凑型智能手机。它提供大量存储空间和高分辨率主摄像头，但没有 5G 功能。在我们的评测中，我们将看看这款紧凑型中端智能手机的表现如何。

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 08/08/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone

屏幕小于 7 英寸的智能手机已不再罕见，但对有些人来说，小巧的智能手机无疑更实用。它更适合放在口袋里，小手更容易使用，而且通常更轻。

Redmi Note 12S 是小米廉价中端系列中新推出的一款略小的机型。但这并不意味着你必须放弃 AMOLED 屏幕和足够的存储空间。

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S (Redmi Note 12 Series)

Processor

Mediatek Helio G96 8 x 2 - 2.1 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G57 MP2

Memory

8 GB

Display

6.43 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 409 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, glossy: yes, 90 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB

, 235 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: 3.5mm, Card Reader: microSD (shared, up to 1TB), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B5/B8), 4G (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B32/B38/B40/B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.1 x 159.9 x 73.9

Battery

5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 33-watt charging

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 13

Camera

Primary Camera: 108 MPix f/1.9, phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/30fps (Camera 1); 8.0MP, f/2.2, wide angle lens (Camera 2); 2.0MP, f/2.4, macro lens (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.4, Videos @1080p/30fps

Additional features

Speakers: hybrid stereo speakers, 24 Months Warranty, FM Radio, fanless

Weight

176 g

Price

249 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
80.4 %	08/2023	Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2	176 g	256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.43"	2400x1080
78.5 %	06/2023	Honor X8a Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2	179 g	128 GB eMMC Flash	6.70"	2388x1080
81.7 %	06/2023	Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G SD 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619	189 g	128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.67"	2400x1080
79.1 %	03/2023	Motorola Moto G53 SD 480+, Adreno 619	183 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.50"	1600x720
79.4 %	05/2023	Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2	202 g	64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.60"	2408x1080

外壳 - 轻质塑料

小米Redmi Note 12S 是一款相当轻巧的智能手机，仅重 176 克，体积明显小于同类产品。小米Redmi Note 12 5G等智能手机相比要小得多。不过，屏幕周围的边框清晰可见，因此如果稍加调整，这款手机可能会更加小巧。

手机外壳由塑料制成，背面闪烁着珍珠绿、冰蓝或玛瑙黑的光泽。摄像头模块从外壳中清晰地凸显出来，并因其深色而显得格外突出。尽管采用了简单的塑料边框，但智能手机非常稳定，几乎无法扭曲。背面有些地方可能会轻微凹陷。

Redmi Note 12S 没有指定保护标准，因此不应暴露在多尘环境中或浸入水中。

尺寸比较

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Motorola Moto G53 Honor X8a Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S DIN A6 ❌

设备 - 花小钱，大内存

小米Redmi Note 12S 有两种配置，其供应情况取决于所在地。价格也是如此。

128 GB 大容量存储空间/6 GB 内存
256 GB 大容量存储空间/8 GB 内存

一个与众不同的功能是调频收音机功能。这在没有网络覆盖或不想使用任何移动数据时非常方便。红外线端口还可以连接遥控设备。

此外，还配备了 NFC 功能，可以使用移动支付服务。

microSD 读卡器

microSD 插槽也是智能手机的第二个 SIM 卡插槽，因此您必须决定是使用两张 SIM 卡，还是使用一张 SIM 卡和 microSD 来获得更多存储空间。

在使用我们的 Angelbird V60 参考卡进行测试时，读取速度相当慢。CPDT 基准测试显示数据传输速率一再下降，因此读卡器只能用于使用频率较低的数据。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	50.48 MB/s +156%
Motorola Moto G53 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)	26.8 MB/s +36%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	23.14 MB/s +17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)	19.7 MB/s

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø34.6 (15.6-48.3)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36.3 (4.86-48.5)

Motorola Moto G53 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø38.9 (28.3-49.6)

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø37.2 (22.3-48.4)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75.3 (44.9-85.2)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø61.2 (29.9-79.8)

Motorola Moto G53 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø76.1 (26.1-84.4)

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø75.7 (20.1-83.4)

软件 -Android 13 ex works

Android 13 已预装在智能手机上。除此之外，还预装了内部的 MiUI 14，它对系统进行了重大改动，有时会在使用系统应用程序时显示广告。此外还预装了大量第三方应用程序，如果需要，可以直接删除。

小米Redmi Note 12S 并不属于 "Android 企业推荐 "计划，该计划可提供有关更新频率和持续时间的信息。因此，很难获得有关该智能手机预期更新和软件供应的信息。

小米 Redmi Note 11S11S 的前身从Android 11 开始，将收到Android 13。因此，预计Redmi Note 12S 2 也会有主要的版本更新。安全补丁是从 2023 年 7 月开始的，因此在评测时还算是最新的。在低价位产品中，小米通常每 3 个月提供一次安全更新。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 跟踪不准确

得益于 WiFi 5，Redmi Note 12S 在使用华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 参考路由器时的数据传输速率高达 388 Mbit/s。因此，这款智能手机的数据传输速率达到了这个价位的通常水平，但我们在测试过程中也观察到数据传输速率有一两次明显下降。在多次重复测试时，这些情况会以不规则的间隔出现。

在靠近路由器的地方，智能手机显示出完整的信号强度，网站加载速度也相当快。在 10 米的距离和穿过 3 面墙时，信号强度保持不变，但网页加载速度明显变慢。

Redmi Note 12S 是一款 4G 智能手机。它提供国内使用所需的最多频率，但您必须进一步询问在国外旅行时是否可以使用移动互联网。在大约两周的评测阶段，我们反复检查了信号，并在同一地点与同网络的高端智能手机进行了比较。小米智能手机在这里处于中等水平，通常无法跟上更昂贵的智能手机的信号强度，但在市内环境中从未完全失去信号

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone (34.8 - 1875, n=211, last 2 years)	651 MBit/s +103%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	369 (361^min - 371^max) MBit/s +15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	347 (336^min - 351^max) MBit/s +8%
Motorola Moto G53 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	345 (317^min - 350^max) MBit/s +8%
Honor X8a Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	333 (276^min - 345^max) MBit/s +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	320 (241^min - 354^max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone (40.5 - 1810, n=212, last 2 years)	687 MBit/s +87%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	369 (337^min - 380^max) MBit/s 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	368 (326^min - 388^max) MBit/s
Honor X8a Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	367 (351^min - 384^max) MBit/s 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	363 (349^min - 374^max) MBit/s -1%
Motorola Moto G53 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	358 (319^min - 374^max) MBit/s -3%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø319 (241-354)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø368 (326-388)

红米智能手机可与所有主要的卫星网络合作进行定位。此外还支持 SBAS，以实现更精确的定位。当我们走到户外时，只需一小会儿就能精确定位到 5 米左右。

至于它的实际功能，我们带着Redmi Note 12 进行了一次自行车骑行，同时还带上了 Garmin Venu 2 智能手表作为对比。

事实证明，即使在相当开阔的地形上，小米智能手机的导航能力也很有限。我们一次又一次地看到明显偏离路线的情况，而且记录的环路明显太小。

在古镇狭窄的街道和过桥时，这些误差也依然存在。根据Redmi Note 12，我们穿过了房屋，在水面上盘旋。即使是这个价位的智能手机也能更精确地跟踪用户。

电话和语音质量 - 必要时声音响亮

小米手机使用谷歌的标准应用程序进行通话。

通过集成的听筒，语音质量清晰响亮，即使在嘈杂的环境中也能很好地理解对方的意思。麦克风也能清晰地捕捉到我们的声音，但时不时会出现一些小的掉音。

扬声器和免提模式的音质明显较弱，因此另一端的人听起来更远，也更难理解。不过，根据对方的说法，我们的声音是以一种易于理解的方式传达的。

相机 - 系统灵活，照片效果出色

Redmi Note 12S 的主摄像头分辨率为 1.08 亿像素，采用三星的 Isocell HM2 传感器。它将 9 个像素合成一个大像素，因此能拍摄出 1200 万像素的图像，且感光度良好。全分辨率只能在特殊模式下使用。

拍摄出来的照片在白平衡方面比较冷，但这有助于真实再现。乍一看，图像很清晰，但放大后细节就会丢失。日光下的动态效果令人满意，但在光线较弱的情况下，动态效果会有所下降，在暗处和亮处都会显示出明显的弱点。

广角相机的分辨率为 800 万像素，在普通拍照模式下，可以使用焦距介于两个镜头之间的混合变焦。该摄像头拍摄的照片效果不错，但你不应该放大照片来查看细节。背面的第三个镜头是一个低分辨率微距摄像头，只能在特殊模式下使用。

前置摄像头为 1600 万像素索尼摄像头。在光线充足的情况下，它能拍出清晰的自拍照，但动态效果不佳，放大后细节看起来颗粒感很强。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera - flower Main camera - surrounding environment Main camera - low light Wide angle

click to load images

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S

Apple iPhone 14

Honor Magic4 Pro

Canon EOS 600D

click to load images

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S

Apple iPhone 14

Honor Magic4 Pro

Canon EOS 600D

click to load images

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S

Apple iPhone 14

Honor Magic4 Pro

Canon EOS 600D

click to load images

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S

Apple iPhone 14

Honor Magic4 Pro

Canon EOS 600D

三星的主摄像头仍需在测试实验室中证明自己。下面是我们在全棚照明下拍摄的测试图。图片边缘的锐度明显下降，红色背景前的黑色文字也给相机带来了锐度问题。

在照度仅为 1 lux 的情况下，图像仍然可以辨认，但细节非常少。

ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S: 8.8 ∆E min: 0.85 - max: 14.9 ∆E

附件和保修 - 含保护套

除了充电器和 USB 线缆外，包装中还有一个智能手机硅胶套和一个打开 SIM 卡托盘的工具。不过，你不会找到一个有线耳机，如果你想使用 FM 收音机，这是绝对必要的，因为它可以替代天线。

小米为在欧盟购买的智能手机提供 24 个月的保修服务（欧盟以外地区可能有所不同）。另外，电池和电源适配器也享受 2 年整机保修。

输入设备和操作 - 精确触摸屏

由于屏幕每秒可显示高达 90 帧的画面，因此操作起来感觉非常灵敏。精确的触摸屏也功不可没，在边边角角都能顺利接受我们的指令。

指纹传感器集成在右侧的待机键上。它能对已注册的指纹做出快速、可靠的反应，并以最小的延迟解锁智能手机。Redmi Note 12S 还提供面部识别功能。不过，它只能对二维图像进行识别，因此容易受到操控。

显示屏 - 屏幕明亮、准确

这个价位（略高于 200 美元）的手机很少采用 AMOLED 屏幕，但小米Redmi Note 12S 却采用了这种屏幕。它具有增强的 FullHD 分辨率和高达 90 Hz 的帧速率。

亮度也达到了很高的水平，尽管我们测得的平均亮度只有 631 cd/m²，而不是小米宣传的 700 cd/m²。我们在小范围内测得的亮度超过 900 cd/m²（APL 18），因此该显示屏也非常适合 HDR 内容，尽管它并没有这样宣传。

由于可以关闭像素，AMOLED 屏幕的黑色值几乎是完美的，这使得小米Redmi Note 12S 的对比度强烈，色彩鲜艳。


638 cd/m²	626 cd/m²	624 cd/m²
636 cd/m²	627 cd/m²	625 cd/m²
643 cd/m²	636 cd/m²	627 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 643 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 631.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 627 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.15 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.284

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.43	Honor X8a IPS, 2388x1080, 6.70	Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67	Motorola Moto G53 IPS, 1600x720, 6.50	Samsung Galaxy A14 5G PLS LCD, 2408x1080, 6.60
Screen		-27%	-11%	-77%	-272%
Brightness middle	627	492 -22%	658 5%	587 -6%	579 -8%
Brightness	631	481 -24%	663 5%	559 -11%	543 -14%
Brightness Distribution	97	94 -3%	98 1%	91 -6%	87 -10%
Black Level *		0.38		0.4	0.57
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.15	1.32 -15%	1.4 -22%	2.6 -126%	7.6 -561%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.05	3.37 -64%	2.7 -32%	5.62 -174%	12.7 -520%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.4	1.9 -36%	1.7 -21%	3.3 -136%	8.7 -521%
Gamma	2.284 ^96%	2.194 ^100%	2.23 ^99%	2.463 ^89%	2.23 ^99%
CCT	6347 ^102%	6288 ^103%	6504 ^100%	6288 ^103%	9344 ^70%
Contrast		1295		1468	1016

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

355.6 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 355.6 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 355.6 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

在固定变焦级别和不同亮度设置下进行的系列测量

令人讨厌的是，在亮度为 50% 或以下时，屏幕会出现明显的 PWM 闪烁，频率在 120 到 356 Hz 之间波动。由于缺少直流调光选项，敏感的人很可能会在这方面出现问题。因此，在购买前一定要对屏幕进行低亮度测试。

在 "标准 "配置文件下，色彩还原非常好，与参考值的偏差很小。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
2.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.1 ms rise
2.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.4 ms rise
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

在户外，即使是在明亮的夏日，明亮的显示屏也很容易阅读。

由于采用了 AMOLED 技术，从各个方向观看都能获得非常广阔的视角。

性能 - 性能良好的老式 SoC

联发科技的 Helio G96Redmi Note 12S 采用的是联发科 Helio G96 处理器。联发科的 Helio G96 处理器在 12S 中使用。 Redmi Note 11S的前身。尽管如此，目前的红米智能手机仍然证明了其强大的性能，并在对比设备中名列前茅。

在日常使用中，你不得不面对系统不时出现卡顿的情况，但总的来说，你可以很好地工作。在启动更复杂的应用程序时，您还需要忍受稍长的等待时间，但事实证明，Helio G96 总体上足以胜任许多任务。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 2138, n=220, last 2 years)	911 Points +72%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144	642 Points +21%
Motorola Moto G53 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	558 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192	530 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	525 Points -1%
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (466 - 530, n=3)	508 Points -4%
Honor X8a Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144	284 Points -46%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6681, n=220, last 2 years)	2988 Points +70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144	1954 Points +11%
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (1688 - 1863, n=3)	1769 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192	1755 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	1700 Points -3%
Motorola Moto G53 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	1632 Points -7%
Honor X8a Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144	1132 Points -35%

Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone (193 - 2930, n=105, last 2 years)	1390 Points +104%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192	680 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G96 ()	680 Points 0%
Honor X8a Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144	438 Points -36%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone (845 - 7408, n=105, last 2 years)	3840 Points +127%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192	1688 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G96 ()	1688 Points 0%
Honor X8a Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144	1217 Points -28%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (102602 - 1650926, n=153, last 2 years)	738503 Points +103%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192	363022 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (297002 - 363022, n=2)	330012 Points -9%
Motorola Moto G53 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	317725 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	308581 Points -15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144	Points -100%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone (4761 - 21385, n=215, last 2 years)	11771 Points +42%
Motorola Moto G53 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	10093 Points +22%
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (8115 - 9209, n=3)	8540 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192	8297 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	8038 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144	7953 Points -4%
Honor X8a Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144	6789 Points -18%

CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (200 - 1474, n=165, last 2 years)	837 Points +62%
Motorola Moto G53 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	546 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144	539 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	534 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192	518 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (440 - 518, n=2)	479 Points -8%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)	5759 Points +87%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144	3337 Points +9%
Motorola Moto G53 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	3236 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192	3072 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (2696 - 3072, n=2)	2884 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	2825 Points -8%
System
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)	9672 Points +70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144	6437 Points +13%
Motorola Moto G53 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	6157 Points +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192	5684 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	5508 Points -3%
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (5016 - 5684, n=2)	5350 Points -6%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)	6267 Points +46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192	4282 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144	4065 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	3991 Points -7%
Motorola Moto G53 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	3782 Points -12%
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (3280 - 4282, n=2)	3781 Points -12%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)	14220 Points +433%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144	4001 Points +50%
Motorola Moto G53 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	2876 Points +8%
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (2666 - 2763, n=2)	2715 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	2676 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192	2666 Points
Web
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)	1495 Points +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192	1372 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (1163 - 1372, n=2)	1268 Points -8%
Motorola Moto G53 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	1263 Points -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144	1184 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	1083 Points -21%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone (207 - 84787, n=150, last 2 years)	21814 Points +133%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192	9380 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (9119 - 9380, n=2)	9250 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	6303 Points -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144	5395 Points -42%
Motorola Moto G53 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	5242 Points -44%

AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 245629, n=105, last 2 years)	17833 Points +2020%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	949 Points +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192	841 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G96 ()	841 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G53 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	424 Points -50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144	Points -100%

Redmi Note 12S 的移动图形芯片无法流畅呈现 4K 游戏图形，但这个价位的其他智能手机也无法做到这一点。即使是全高清图形，你也必须运行不太复杂的游戏才能获得流畅的游戏体验。12Redmi Note 12 5G在这方面要强大得多。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	326 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	310 Points -5%
Motorola Moto G53 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	287 Points -12%
Honor X8a Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	156 Points -52%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	324 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	317 Points
Motorola Moto G53 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	293 Points -8%
Honor X8a Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	188 Points -41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1139 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1139 Points
Motorola Moto G53 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	973 Points -15%
Honor X8a Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	622 Points -45%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1191 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1160 Points
Motorola Moto G53 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	982 Points -15%
Honor X8a Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	697 Points -40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Motorola Moto G53 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2901 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2846 Points +15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2677 Points +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2468 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2347 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2289 Points +5%
Motorola Moto G53 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2232 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2178 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2413 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2393 Points +7%
Motorola Moto G53 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2363 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2236 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3618 Points +14%
Motorola Moto G53 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3387 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3231 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3174 Points
Honor X8a Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2478 Points -22%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2590 Points +15%
Motorola Moto G53 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2412 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2347 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2244 Points
Honor X8a Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1231 Points -45%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2709 Points +13%
Motorola Moto G53 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2638 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2546 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2400 Points
Honor X8a Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1386 Points -42%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Moto G53 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	103 fps +106%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	58 fps +16%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	56 fps +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	50 fps
Honor X8a Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	34 fps -32%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	85 fps +49%
Motorola Moto G53 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	81 fps +42%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	64 fps +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	57 fps
Honor X8a Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	38 fps -33%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Moto G53 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	68 fps +127%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	36 fps +20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	30 fps
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	27 fps -10%
Honor X8a Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	19 fps -37%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	43 fps +23%
Motorola Moto G53 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	41 fps +17%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	36 fps +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	35 fps
Honor X8a Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	21 fps -40%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Motorola Moto G53 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	55 fps +175%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	25 fps +25%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	21 fps +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	20 fps
Honor X8a Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	13 fps -35%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	31 fps +41%
Motorola Moto G53 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	29 fps +32%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	24 fps +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	22 fps
Honor X8a Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	13 fps -41%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Motorola Moto G53 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	29 fps +164%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15 fps +36%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	12 fps +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	11 fps
Honor X8a Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	7.4 fps -33%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Motorola Moto G53 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	17 fps +31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	17 fps +31%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15 fps +15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	13 fps
Honor X8a Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	8.7 fps -33%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Motorola Moto G53 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	20 fps +141%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	11 fps +33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.3 fps
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7.9 fps -5%
Honor X8a Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	4.8 fps -42%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Moto G53 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	8.9 fps +62%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7.1 fps +29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.5 fps
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.3 fps -4%
Honor X8a Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	3.2 fps -42%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Motorola Moto G53 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	31 fps +138%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	17 fps +31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	13 fps
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	12 fps -8%
Honor X8a Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	7.5 fps -42%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	20 fps +43%
Motorola Moto G53 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	18 fps +29%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	14 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	14 fps
Honor X8a Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	8.2 fps -41%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3.1 fps +55%
Motorola Moto G53 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2.9 fps +45%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2.3 fps +15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2 fps
Honor X8a Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1.5 fps -25%

就上网冲浪而言，Redmi Note 12S 在同价位手机中还算不错的选择。在浏览器基准测试中，它的速度通常快于同类智能手机，在日常使用中，网站加载速度也相当快。不过，你往往需要等待一段时间才能看到图片。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)	106.1 Points +71%
Motorola Moto G53 (Chrome 111)	69.475 Points +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S (Chrome 115)	62.192 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G (Chrome 113.0.5672.76)	58.044 Points -7%
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (42.5 - 62.2, n=2)	52.4 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (Chrome 112)	48.955 Points -21%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)	107.1 runs/min +103%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S (Chrome 115)	52.7 runs/min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G (Chrome 113.0.5672.76)	48.5 runs/min -8%
Motorola Moto G53 (Chrome 111)	47.78 runs/min -9%
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (34.4 - 52.7, n=2)	43.6 runs/min -17%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (Chrome 112)	34.4 runs/min -35%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=160, last 2 years)	100.2 Points +73%
Motorola Moto G53 (Chrome 111)	77 Points +33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G (Chrome 113.0.5672.76)	68 Points +17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S (Chrome 115)	58 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (2111)	50 Points -14%
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (42 - 58, n=2)	50 Points -14%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)	133.1 Points +73%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G (Chrome 113.0.5672.76)	91 Points +18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S (Chrome 115)	77 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (55 - 77, n=2)	66 Points -14%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=214, last 2 years)	33357 Points +68%
Motorola Moto G53 (Chrome 111)	20938 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S (Chrome 115)	19873 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G (Chrome 113.0.5672.76)	19867 Points 0%
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (17394 - 19873, n=2)	18634 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (Chrome 112)	15352 Points -23%
Honor X8a (Chrome 114)	9404 Points -53%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (2560 - 2773, n=2)	2667 ms * -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S (Chrome 115)	2560.2 ms *
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (Chrome 112)	2337.2 ms * +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G (Chrome 113.0.5672.76)	2117.2 ms * +17%
Motorola Moto G53 (Chrome 111)	1829.3 ms * +29%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)	1595 ms * +38%

* ... smaller is better

Redmi Note 12S 的 UFS 2.2 存储速度相当快。不过，如果配备相应的快速内存控制器，这种存储设备就能发挥更大的作用。三星Galaxy A14 5G所示。即便如此，Redmi Note 12S 仍能提供快速的数据传输和相对较短的加载时间。

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S	Honor X8a	Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G	Motorola Moto G53	Samsung Galaxy A14 5G	Average 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-66%	-9%	-28%	13%	32%	92%
Sequential Read 256KB	518.7	278.1 -46%	520.09 0%	474.6 -9%	849.3 64%	892 ?(482 - 1009, n=22) 72%	1508 ?(226 - 4512, n=218, last 2 years) 191%
Sequential Write 256KB	492.3	224.2 -54%	505.55 3%	243.87 -50%	469.83 -5%	690 ?(369 - 913, n=22) 40%	1118 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=218, last 2 years) 127%
Random Read 4KB	211.9	61.6 -71%	170.61 -19%	166.24 -22%	193.63 -9%	219 ?(99.7 - 291, n=22) 3%	247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=218, last 2 years) 17%
Random Write 4KB	202.6	18.7 -91%	161.26 -20%	139.83 -31%	204 1%	230 ?(99.2 - 301, n=22) 14%	272 ?(13 - 709, n=218, last 2 years) 34%

游戏 - 某些游戏只能达到 60 帧/秒

Redmi Note 12S 很少能在游戏中达到 60 帧/秒。虽然在快速 2D 射击游戏《Armajet》中可以达到 60 帧/秒，但偶尔也会出现帧数波动。

在《PUBG Mobile》中，在非常低的设置下，我们可以看到高达 40 帧的帧数，否则 30 帧是正常情况。帧率通过 GameBench 进行测量。

通过触摸屏和位置传感器进行控制的效果非常好。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø59.1 (54-60)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 2.7.0: Ø39.7 (38-41)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.7.0: Ø29.8 (28-31)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S; Diablo Immortal; Medium Mobile Low; 2.0.2: Ø29.2 (24-31)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S; Diablo Immortal; Ultra Mobile Very High; 2.0.2: Ø29.4 (22-31)

排放 - 仅轻微节流

温度

智能手机的最高温度为 42.2 °C，在长时间负载的情况下会变得非常热，但不会达到临界温度，始终可以保持稳定。在长时间负载下，性能也保持稳定。同样的基准测试运行 20 次后，我们测得最高性能下降了 8%。

Max. Load

Idle


42.2 °C	36.7 °C	33.8 °C
41.2 °C	36.3 °C	33.7 °C
40.8 °C	36.3 °C	33.8 °C

Maximum: 42.2 °C
Average: 37.2 °C


35.2 °C	36.8 °C	40.6 °C
34.4 °C	37 °C	42.1 °C
32.8 °C	37.1 °C	40.3 °C

Maximum: 42.1 °C
Average: 37.4 °C

Power Supply (max.) 42.3 °C | Room Temperature 21.3 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.2 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.5 % +9%
Motorola Moto G53 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	96.9 % +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	91.7 %
Honor X8a Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	83 % -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	% -100%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99 %
Motorola Moto G53 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	98.8 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	98.4 % -1%
Honor X8a Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	81.8 % -17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	% -100%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø1.956 (1.948-1.968)

Honor X8a Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø1.011 (0.932-1.14)

Motorola Moto G53 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø1.755 (1.744-1.766)

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø1.978 (1.957-1.988)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø6.91 (6.4-6.98)

Honor X8a Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.9 (3.73-4.49)

Motorola Moto G53 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø5.87 (5.72-5.9)

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø7.2 (7.18-7.21)

发言人

扬声器系统由位于底部边缘的主扬声器和作为第二扬声器的听筒组成，侧握手机时可产生轻微的立体声效果，声音重现相当清晰。不过，一旦加入乐器，两个扬声器就显得有点力不从心，变得不精确。声音也比较高亢，但即使开到最大音量也很少让人感到不舒服。

使用音频接口或蓝牙连接外接音频设备时，音效会更好。此外，小米还为无线音频传输提供了多种编解码器，包括 SBC、AAC、最重要的 aptX 编解码器、LDAC 和 LHDC（最高版本 5）。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 长时间运行

耗电量

Redmi Note 12S 电池在低负荷时几乎不需要任何能量，但在重负荷时耗电量可高达 8.6 瓦。

一旦电池耗尽，充电功率可达 33 瓦。幸运的是，小米在低价位产品中提供了快速充电技术，这意味着Redmi Note 12S 在电池完全耗尽的情况下可在 1:45 小时内完成充电。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	1 / 1.3 / 1.5 Watt
Load	5.8 / 8.6 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G 5000 mAh	Motorola Moto G53 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A14 5G 5000 mAh	Average Mediatek Helio G96	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		0%	4%	0%	2%	-1%
Idle Minimum *	1	0.99 1%	0.8 20%	0.64 36%	0.945 ?(0.89 - 1, n=2) 5%	0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years) 10%
Idle Average *	1.3	1.98 -52%	1.5 -15%	2.1 -62%	1.585 ?(1.3 - 1.87, n=2) -22%	1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years) -12%
Idle Maximum *	1.5	2.02 -35%	2 -33%	2.17 -45%	1.7 ?(1.5 - 1.9, n=2) -13%	1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years) -9%
Load Average *	5.8	3.35 42%	4.6 21%	3.73 36%	4.41 ?(3.01 - 5.8, n=2) 24%	5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years) 4%
Load Maximum *	8.6	4.72 45%	6.3 27%	5.44 37%	7.43 ?(6.26 - 8.6, n=2) 14%	8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years) 3%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.3 (1.021-8.59)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.189 (1.035-1.437)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.11 (3.79-6.42)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.189 (1.035-1.437)

电池寿命

我们还通过各种电池测试检验了日常使用中的电池寿命。最重要的是我们的 WLAN 测试，它模拟了日常互联网使用。这款智能手机的续航时间接近 16 小时，因此在同价位手机中取得了不错的成绩。在同价位手机中处于中游水平。

考虑到可能的高消耗率，近 6 小时的负载时间也是一个不错的值，因此节能功能似乎发挥了作用。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		29h 56min
WiFi Websurfing		15h 53min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		17h 22min
Load (maximum brightness)		5h 56min

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S 5000 mAh	Honor X8a 4500 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G 5000 mAh	Motorola Moto G53 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A14 5G 5000 mAh
Battery Runtime		-3%	-7%	8%	13%
Reader / Idle	1796		1668 -7%	2301 28%	2558 42%
H.264	1042		1065 2%	1165 12%	1111 7%
WiFi v1.3	953	927 -3%	645 -32%	1035 9%	1029 8%
Load	356		388 9%	297 -17%	340 -4%

Pros

+ 坚固的外壳

+ 小巧轻便

+ 明亮的 AMOLED 屏幕

+ 电池寿命长

+ 快速充电技术

+ 大量存储空间

Cons

- PWM 闪烁

- 定位不准确

- 系统充斥广告

- 无 5G

评价：紧凑型中端产品，屏幕明亮

如果你正在寻找一款体积小巧、续航时间长且屏幕出色的智能手机，那么小米Redmi Note 12S 应该是你的首选。

这款手机的外壳并不出众，软件广告偶尔也很烦人，扬声器系统也很一般。但这款智能手机确实具有良好的存储容量、不错的照片质量、灵活的应用程序选项和快速充电功能。

在性能方面，这款智能手机与同类产品相当，但尽管存储速度很快，你也不得不忍受偶尔的延迟。AMOLED 屏幕缺乏直流调光功能可能会让敏感的用户感到不舒服，因为它在低亮度时会强烈闪烁。

小米Redmi Note 12S 是一款拥有大量存储空间和明亮 AMOLED 屏幕的紧凑型智能手机。

如果用户不想没有 5G，而且手机大小不是最重要的标准，也可以购买小米Redmi Note 12 5G.三星三星Galaxy A14 5G同样小巧，但存储空间要小得多。

价格和供应情况

在美国亚马逊，买家可以购买小米Redmi Note 12S 的 256 GB 版本，有冰蓝色（219.50 美元）、玛瑙黑（217.00 美元）或珍珠绿（214.00 美元）三种颜色。

价格截至 2023 年 8 月 8 日，可能会有变动。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S - 2023-08-07 08/07/2023 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis

81%

Keyboard

65 / 75 → 87%

Pointing Device

90%

Connectivity

46 / 70 → 66%

Weight

90%

Battery

91%

Display

92%

Games Performance

24 / 64 → 38%

Application Performance

69 / 86 → 81%

Temperature

89%

Noise

100%

Audio

64 / 90 → 71%

Camera

60%

Average

74%

80%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Jacob Fisher - Translator - 922 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 389876 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 小米Redmi Note 12S 智能手机评测：轻巧、廉价、OLED 屏幕

Florian Schmitt, 2023-08- 8 (Update: 2023-08- 8)

小米Redmi Note 12S 智能手机评测：轻巧、廉价、OLED 屏幕

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳 - 轻质塑料

尺寸比较

设备 - 花小钱，大内存

microSD 读卡器

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

软件 -Android 13 ex works

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 跟踪不准确

电话和语音质量 - 必要时声音响亮

相机 - 系统灵活，照片效果出色

附件和保修 - 含保护套

输入设备和操作 - 精确触摸屏

显示屏 - 屏幕明亮、准确

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - 性能良好的老式 SoC

游戏 - 某些游戏只能达到 60 帧/秒

排放 - 仅轻微节流

温度

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

发言人

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G audio analysis

电池寿命 - 长时间运行

耗电量

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

评价：紧凑型中端产品，屏幕明亮

价格和供应情况

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Pricecompare