Notebookcheck

红米Note 7智能手机评测

Inge Schwabe, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Sabrina Hartmann (translated by Zewei Shen), 04/25/2019
Android ARM Chinese Tech Smartphone Touchscreen

价格屠夫。 由于小米的新营销策略,小米红米Note 7在前不久被直接更名为红米 Note 7.由于它具有智能手机目前最高的相机像素和相对较弱的Snapdragon 660,因此难以给出准确的分类。 我们测试了子品牌红米的第一款官方智能手机,以发现其真正的潜力。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Redmi Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Octa-Core, 64 Bit
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 512
Memory
4096 MB 
Display
6.3 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 409 PPI, 多点电容触控屏, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, glossy: yes
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 51 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm组合, USB type-C, Card Reader: microSD高达256 GB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速度计,陀螺仪,接近传感器,指南针,指纹传感器, USB type-C 2.0
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM 900/1800/1900 MHz, UMTS 850/900/1900/2100 MHz, FDD LTE: B1,B3,B5,B7,B8, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.1 x 159.21 x 75.21
Battery
4000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix 48MP(三星GM1,1 / 2“,0.8μm,f / 1.8)PDAF + 5MP(f / 2.4)深度传感器,双LED,1080p @ 30/60 / 120fps
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix HDR, AI人像模式,视频1080p @ 30fps
Additional features
Speakers: 单声道扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟键盘, CHN AC适配器,USB充电器,硅胶外壳(+ EU适配器和USB OTG线), MIUI 10.2, system languages: English, Chinese; game speed booster, 12 Months Warranty, FM收音机,红外线,OTG,无线显示, QC4.0, fanless
Weight
186 g, Power Supply: 76 g
Price
227 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Lock screen
Lock screen
Earpiece between display and outer chassis
Left side, card tray
Included soft case
Redmi Note 7 in its case
Protruding camera
OEM demo photo
OEM demo photo of the black model
OEM demo photo of the dream blue model
OEM demo photo of the twilight gold model

Size Comparison

158.4 mm 75.64 mm 9.55 mm 186 g159.21 mm 75.21 mm 8.1 mm 186 g156.4 mm 75.8 mm 7.5 mm 169 g154.9 mm 74.8 mm 7.6 mm 175 g150.7 mm 72.3 mm 8.35 mm 168 g148.6 mm 71.2 mm 7.4 mm 145 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
615 MBit/s ∼100% +76%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB eMMC Flash
356 (min: 342, max: 371) MBit/s ∼58% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
350 (min: 327, max: 361) MBit/s ∼57%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
281 MBit/s ∼46% -20%
Nokia 7 Plus
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
247 MBit/s ∼40% -29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=409)
222 MBit/s ∼36% -37%
Huawei P20 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 64 GB eMMC Flash
198 MBit/s ∼32% -43%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
615 MBit/s ∼100% +158%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
346 MBit/s ∼56% +45%
Nokia 7 Plus
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
307 MBit/s ∼50% +29%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB eMMC Flash
285 (min: 142, max: 294) MBit/s ∼46% +20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
238 (min: 189, max: 285) MBit/s ∼39%
Huawei P20 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 64 GB eMMC Flash
233 MBit/s ∼38% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=409)
212 MBit/s ∼34% -11%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø350 (327-361)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø356 (342-371)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø238 (189-285)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø281 (142-294)
Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
Garmin Edge 500 - Pond
Garmin Edge 500 - Pond
Garmin Edge 500 - Loop
Garmin Edge 500 - Loop
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 - Overview
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 - Overview
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 - Pond
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 - Pond
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 - Loop
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 - Loop
48 MP picture, Redmi Note 7
48 MP picture, Redmi Note 7
48 MP picture, Honor View 20
48 MP picture, Honor View 20
HDR photo (12MP), Redmi Note 7
HDR photo (12MP), Honor View 20

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Reference card
Reference card
Detailed magnification
Detailed magnification
531
cd/m²
558
cd/m²
565
cd/m²
512
cd/m²
541
cd/m²
562
cd/m²
518
cd/m²
537
cd/m²
539
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 565 cd/m² Average: 540.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.24 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 541 cd/m²
Contrast: 1639:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.7 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 3.1 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
99.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
IPS, 2280x1080, 6.26
Huawei P20 Lite
IPS, 2280x1080, 5.84
Nokia 7 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
LTPS, 2160x1080, 5.65
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Super AMOLED, 2248x1080, 6.2
Screen
-20%
-47%
-16%
-43%
-15%
Brightness middle
541
421
-22%
528
-2%
458
-15%
675
25%
429
-21%
Brightness
540
389
-28%
525
-3%
463
-14%
650
20%
432
-20%
Brightness Distribution
91
85
-7%
89
-2%
92
1%
92
1%
88
-3%
Black Level *
0.33
0.33
-0%
0.51
-55%
0.22
33%
0.46
-39%
Contrast
1639
1276
-22%
1035
-37%
2082
27%
1467
-10%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.7
3.4
-26%
4.7
-74%
4
-48%
5.9
-119%
3.39
-26%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.6
5.9
-28%
8.9
-93%
7.4
-61%
9.5
-107%
5.25
-14%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.1
3.9
-26%
6.4
-106%
4.7
-52%
6.6
-113%
3.3
-6%
Gamma
2.26 97%
2.26 97%
2.22 99%
2.19 100%
2.36 93%
2.238 98%
CCT
6853 95%
7330 89%
7987 81%
7425 88%
7846 83%
7135 91%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2336 Hz ≤ 18 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2336 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 18 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2336 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9429 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.4 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 52 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (25.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
60 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 27.6 ms rise
↘ 32.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (40.2 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
5576 Points ∼39%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5640 Points ∼39% +1%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
3116 Points ∼22% -44%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
5688 Points ∼40% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14299 Points ∼100% +156%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (4983 - 5811, n=9)
5524 Points ∼39% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=307)
4559 Points ∼32% -18%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
5913 Points ∼69%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5893 Points ∼69% 0%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
3749 Points ∼44% -37%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
5867 Points ∼69% -1%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
5856 Points ∼69% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8548 Points ∼100% +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (4895 - 5913, n=11)
5694 Points ∼67% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=362)
4549 Points ∼53% -23%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1639 Points ∼67%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1621 Points ∼66% -1%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
935 Points ∼38% -43%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1646 Points ∼67% 0%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1579 Points ∼65% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2441 Points ∼100% +49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (1431 - 1646, n=11)
1598 Points ∼65% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (691 - 4824, n=364)
1354 Points ∼55% -17%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
6187 Points ∼84%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
6052 Points ∼82% -2%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
4793 Points ∼65% -23%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
6077 Points ∼83% -2%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
5965 Points ∼81% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7360 Points ∼100% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (5789 - 6187, n=10)
6022 Points ∼82% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3227 - 11440, n=357)
4997 Points ∼68% -19%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
6870 Points ∼77%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
6274 Points ∼70% -9%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
5704 Points ∼64% -17%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
6825 Points ∼76% -1%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
6332 Points ∼71% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8967 Points ∼100% +31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (6274 - 7026, n=10)
6654 Points ∼74% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4096 - 14439, n=525)
5466 Points ∼61% -20%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2768 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2758 Points ∼99% 0%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
1638 Points ∼59% -41%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2789 Points ∼100% +1%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2615 Points ∼94% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2227 Points ∼80% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (2121 - 2797, n=10)
2654 Points ∼95% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=372)
1830 Points ∼66% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1262 Points ∼30%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1265 Points ∼30% 0%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
401 Points ∼10% -68%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1239 Points ∼29% -2%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1268 Points ∼30% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4209 Points ∼100% +234%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (1134 - 1268, n=10)
1235 Points ∼29% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=372)
1598 Points ∼38% +27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1436 Points ∼41%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1438 Points ∼41% 0%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
482 Points ∼14% -66%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1441 Points ∼41% 0%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1432 Points ∼41% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3512 Points ∼100% +145%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (1270 - 1442, n=10)
1403 Points ∼40% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=375)
1484 Points ∼42% +3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2772 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2751 Points ∼99% -1%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
1671 Points ∼60% -40%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2768 Points ∼100% 0%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2756 Points ∼99% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2145 Points ∼77% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (2238 - 2815, n=10)
2700 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=386)
1805 Points ∼65% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2006 Points ∼34%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2015 Points ∼34% 0%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
604 Points ∼10% -70%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1980 Points ∼33% -1%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2024 Points ∼34% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5922 Points ∼100% +195%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (1734 - 2033, n=10)
1934 Points ∼33% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=386)
2194 Points ∼37% +9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2073 Points ∼49%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2142 Points ∼51% +3%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
704 Points ∼17% -66%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2114 Points ∼50% +2%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2151 Points ∼51% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4232 Points ∼100% +104%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (1887 - 2151, n=10)
2055 Points ∼49% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 8141, n=387)
1860 Points ∼44% -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2708 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2759 Points ∼100% +2%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
1757 Points ∼64% -35%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2749 Points ∼100% +2%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2628 Points ∼95% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2118 Points ∼77% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (1883 - 2759, n=10)
2573 Points ∼93% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4320, n=448)
1760 Points ∼64% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1189 Points ∼32%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1193 Points ∼32% 0%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
207 Points ∼6% -83%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1161 Points ∼31% -2%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1196 Points ∼32% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3742 Points ∼100% +215%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (1061 - 1201, n=10)
1173 Points ∼31% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=450)
1324 Points ∼35% +11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1358 Points ∼42%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1365 Points ∼43% +1%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
257 Points ∼8% -81%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1332 Points ∼42% -2%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1361 Points ∼43% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3197 Points ∼100% +135%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (1175 - 1372, n=11)
1339 Points ∼42% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=458)
1262 Points ∼39% -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2834 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2719 Points ∼96% -4%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
1760 Points ∼62% -38%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2734 Points ∼96% -4%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2638 Points ∼93% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2176 Points ∼77% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (2383 - 2834, n=10)
2700 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4454, n=480)
1667 Points ∼59% -41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1925 Points ∼29%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1929 Points ∼29% 0%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
109 Points ∼2% -94%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1895 Points ∼29% -2%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1938 Points ∼30% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6554 Points ∼100% +240%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (1711 - 1938, n=10)
1891 Points ∼29% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=480)
1801 Points ∼27% -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2073 Points ∼46%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2062 Points ∼46% -1%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
138 Points ∼3% -93%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2035 Points ∼45% -2%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2059 Points ∼45% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4529 Points ∼100% +118%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (1825 - 2073, n=10)
2025 Points ∼45% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7820, n=488)
1541 Points ∼34% -26%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
19087 Points ∼62%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
20437 Points ∼66% +7%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
13387 Points ∼44% -30%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
20085 Points ∼65% +5%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
19050 Points ∼62% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
30765 Points ∼100% +61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (15088 - 21016, n=10)
19357 Points ∼63% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 45072, n=640)
13636 Points ∼44% -29%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
29496 Points ∼38%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
29116 Points ∼38% -1%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
11713 Points ∼15% -60%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
29333 Points ∼38% -1%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
29306 Points ∼38% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
77003 Points ∼100% +161%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (25561 - 29496, n=10)
28566 Points ∼37% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (11427 - 162695, n=640)
19988 Points ∼26% -32%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
26308 Points ∼46%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
26605 Points ∼46% +1%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
12048 Points ∼21% -54%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
26610 Points ∼46% +1%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
26175 Points ∼45% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
57711 Points ∼100% +119%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (22145 - 26731, n=10)
25808 Points ∼45% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (11565 - 83518, n=641)
16573 Points ∼29% -37%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
51 fps ∼50%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
50 fps ∼49% -2%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
19 fps ∼19% -63%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
50 fps ∼49% -2%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
46 fps ∼45% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
102 fps ∼100% +100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (43 - 51, n=10)
48.2 fps ∼47% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=669)
35 fps ∼34% -31%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
44 fps ∼76%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
47 fps ∼81% +7%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
19 fps ∼33% -57%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
48 fps ∼83% +9%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
51 fps ∼88% +16%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
58 fps ∼100% +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (42 - 52, n=10)
47.8 fps ∼82% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=672)
26.9 fps ∼46% -39%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
23 fps ∼43%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
22 fps ∼41% -4%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
8.7 fps ∼16% -62%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
23 fps ∼43% 0%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
23 fps ∼43% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
54 fps ∼100% +135%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (20 - 23, n=10)
22.3 fps ∼41% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=588)
19.3 fps ∼36% -16%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
20 fps ∼39%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
21 fps ∼41% +5%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
8.9 fps ∼17% -55%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
22 fps ∼43% +10%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
22 fps ∼43% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
51 fps ∼100% +155%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (19 - 23, n=10)
21.3 fps ∼42% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=593)
17.8 fps ∼35% -11%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
15 fps ∼47%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
15 fps ∼47% 0%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
5.2 fps ∼16% -65%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
14 fps ∼44% -7%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
15 fps ∼47% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
32 fps ∼100% +113%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (13 - 15, n=10)
14.5 fps ∼45% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=449)
15.9 fps ∼50% +6%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
13 fps ∼45%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
14 fps ∼48% +8%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
5.6 fps ∼19% -57%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
15 fps ∼52% +15%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
14 fps ∼48% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
29 fps ∼100% +123%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (12 - 15, n=11)
13.7 fps ∼47% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=452)
15.2 fps ∼52% +17%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
4.8 fps ∼54%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5.1 fps ∼57% +6%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
5.2 fps ∼58% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (3 - 6.3, n=5)
4.88 fps ∼54% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=152)
8.97 fps ∼100% +87%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
3.2 fps ∼52%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
3.2 fps ∼52% 0%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
3.2 fps ∼52% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (3.2 - 4.8, n=5)
3.52 fps ∼57% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=152)
6.2 fps ∼100% +94%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
7.6 fps ∼56%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
8.1 fps ∼60% +7%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
8.2 fps ∼61% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (7.5 - 9.7, n=5)
8.22 fps ∼61% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=154)
13.5 fps ∼100% +78%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
8.7 fps ∼59%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
8.5 fps ∼57% -2%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
8.6 fps ∼58% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (8.5 - 8.7, n=5)
8.6 fps ∼58% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=153)
14.8 fps ∼100% +70%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
9.1 fps ∼36%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
9 fps ∼36% -1%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
3.1 fps ∼12% -66%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
8.3 fps ∼33% -9%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
9.1 fps ∼36% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
25 fps ∼100% +175%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (8.1 - 9.1, n=10)
8.88 fps ∼36% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=378)
10.7 fps ∼43% +18%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
7.8 fps ∼33%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
8.4 fps ∼35% +8%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
3.3 fps ∼14% -58%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
9.1 fps ∼38% +17%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
8.6 fps ∼36% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
24 fps ∼100% +208%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (7.5 - 9.8, n=11)
8.58 fps ∼36% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=382)
9.65 fps ∼40% +24%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
143352 Points ∼50%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
143551 Points ∼50% 0%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
88550 Points ∼31% -38%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
141701 Points ∼49% -1%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
140875 Points ∼49% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
288062 Points ∼100% +101%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (116346 - 143551, n=10)
137699 Points ∼48% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52607 - 398720, n=270)
130378 Points ∼45% -9%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
118368 Points ∼51%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
118773 Points ∼51% 0%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
68232 Points ∼29% -42%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
117165 Points ∼50% -1%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
115834 Points ∼50% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
232931 Points ∼100% +97%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (105973 - 120479, n=11)
116194 Points ∼50% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23275 - 283270, n=475)
85519 Points ∼37% -28%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1086 Points ∼84%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1086 Points ∼84% 0%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
858 Points ∼67% -21%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1101 Points ∼85% +1%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1146 Points ∼89% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1288 Points ∼100% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (1027 - 1146, n=10)
1092 Points ∼85% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=600)
741 Points ∼58% -32%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2308 Points ∼29%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2293 Points ∼29% -1%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
848 Points ∼11% -63%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2298 Points ∼29% 0%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2279 Points ∼29% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7965 Points ∼100% +245%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (1970 - 2332, n=10)
2257 Points ∼28% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=600)
1942 Points ∼24% -16%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2332 Points ∼66%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2269 Points ∼64% -3%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
1930 Points ∼55% -17%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2503 Points ∼71% +7%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2494 Points ∼71% +7%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3521 Points ∼100% +51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (1737 - 2799, n=10)
2360 Points ∼67% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=600)
1446 Points ∼41% -38%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
5141 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5237 Points ∼80% +2%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
3109 Points ∼47% -40%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
4976 Points ∼76% -3%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
5048 Points ∼77% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6556 Points ∼100% +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (3745 - 5282, n=10)
4957 Points ∼76% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=600)
2852 Points ∼44% -45%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2342 Points ∼60%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2332 Points ∼59% 0%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
1445 Points ∼37% -38%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2369 Points ∼60% +1%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2394 Points ∼61% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3923 Points ∼100% +68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (1905 - 2428, n=11)
2314 Points ∼59% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=604)
1418 Points ∼36% -39%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69)
80.876 Points ∼100% +48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72)
54.708 Points ∼68%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
53.89 Points ∼67% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)
52.897 Points ∼65% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (45.3 - 55.5, n=10)
52.4 Points ∼65% -4%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67)
49.396 Points ∼61% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 273, n=503)
38.7 Points ∼48% -29%
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)
23.424 Points ∼29% -57%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69)
14617 Points ∼100% +37%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
10945 Points ∼75% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72)
10679 Points ∼73%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)
10378 Points ∼71% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (8463 - 10945, n=11)
10080 Points ∼69% -6%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67)
9582 Points ∼66% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (1994 - 43280, n=661)
6268 Points ∼43% -41%
Huawei P20 Lite
4191 Points ∼29% -61%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=681)
10805 ms * ∼100% -174%
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)
10788.1 ms * ∼100% -173%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67)
4093.5 ms * ∼38% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (3796 - 4769, n=10)
4057 ms * ∼38% -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72)
3948 ms * ∼37%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
3937.3 ms * ∼36% -0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)
3879.5 ms * ∼36% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69)
2316.8 ms * ∼21% +41%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 161, n=132)
63.5 Points ∼100% +4%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
63 Points ∼99% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)
62 Points ∼98% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72)
61 Points ∼96%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (58 - 63, n=6)
60.7 Points ∼96% 0%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67)
58 Points ∼91% -5%
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)
34 Points ∼54% -44%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69)
251 Points ∼100% +44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72)
174 Points ∼69%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)
171 Points ∼68% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (159 - 182, n=8)
171 Points ∼68% -2%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
168 Points ∼67% -3%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67)
159 Points ∼63% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (66 - 362, n=329)
119 Points ∼47% -32%
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)
86 Points ∼34% -51%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Redmi Note 7Xiaomi Mi 8 LiteHuawei P20 LiteNokia 7 PlusBQ Aquaris X2 ProXiaomi Mi 8 Explorer EditionAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
2%
53%
-1%
-7%
62%
-3%
-21%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
59.51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
63.95 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
7%
69.01 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
16%
62.31
5%
61.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
56.3 (58.4 - 74.7, n=100)
-5%
48.6 (9.5 - 87.1, n=403)
-18%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
85.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
83.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
82.21
-1%
83.35 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
74.3 (76.1 - 87.2, n=100)
-11%
66.6 (8.1 - 96.5, n=403)
-20%
Random Write 4KB
16.06
18.75
17%
71.07
343%
19.62
22%
15.43
-4%
22.65
41%
24.3 (3.4 - 88.2, n=109)
51%
20.1 (0.14 - 250, n=711)
25%
Random Read 4KB
82.94
81.25
-2%
48.19
-42%
54.65
-34%
51.25
-38%
135.21
63%
54.3 (11.4 - 149, n=109)
-35%
44.8 (1.59 - 175, n=711)
-46%
Sequential Write 256KB
204.72
172.43
-16%
198.3
-3%
211.6
3%
204.83
0%
205.23
0%
171 (40 - 246, n=109)
-16%
92.1 (2.99 - 503, n=711)
-55%
Sequential Read 256KB
283.36
282.62
0%
293.94
4%
283.12
0%
280.78
-1%
691.65
144%
272 (95.6 - 704, n=109)
-4%
258 (12.1 - 1468, n=711)
-9%
Asphalt 9 - Legends Compare
010203040Tooltip
; High Quality; 1.4.1a: Ø28.2 (26-30)
; Standard / low; 1.4.1a: Ø28 (24-31)
Subway Surfers Compare
0102030405060Tooltip
; 1.100.0: Ø59.7 (51-60)
Max. Load
 33.8 °C32.8 °C31.4 °C 
 33.1 °C32.7 °C32.2 °C 
 32.5 °C32.9 °C31.4 °C 
Maximum: 33.8 °C
Average: 32.5 °C
28.8 °C31.1 °C33.9 °C
28 °C31.2 °C34.2 °C
29.2 °C31.1 °C33.6 °C
Maximum: 34.2 °C
Average: 31.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  28.9 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.5 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.6 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.635.42528.224.53124.624402124.4502834.76327.226.88025.422.210023.621.512519.223.91602040.820016.449.72501756.631516.560.440015.665.250014.37063012.869.78001470.3100014.673125014.276.816001476.9200014.179.5250014.479.4315014.277.4400014.675.5500014.173.1630014.666.9800014.767.71000015.1731250014.968.4160001557SPL26.687.6N0.869median 14.6median 69.7Delta1.6935.24232.941.837.230.431.736.639.641.828.331.427.331.526.934.226.731.42429.620.938.320.947.619.546.618.55417.562.817.559.415.758.915.86316.666.415.869.315.471.315.573.41674.815.875.91676.516.371.216.371.616.271.316.467.516.459.628.684.11.153.6median 16.4median 632.111.331.727.933.935.647.65031.234.63837.527.128.327.129.424.627.320.634.318.840.918.546.417.749.71752.216.55916.961.114.463.71468.313.567.513.765.913.967.312.767.812.770.112.769.412.566.611.96311.461.611.564.411.664.111.552.811.442.570.167.725.778.725.721.20.743median 13.7median 632.58.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Note 7Huawei P20 LiteXiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei P20 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.11 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.61 / 1.95 / 2.03 Watt
Load midlight 4.56 / 9.15 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
3350 mAh
Huawei P20 Lite
3000 mAh
Nokia 7 Plus
3800 mAh
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
3100 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
3000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
1%
-3%
3%
-1%
-69%
-4%
3%
Idle Minimum *
0.61
0.56
8%
0.98
-61%
0.65
-7%
0.63
-3%
1.8
-195%
0.738 (0.56 - 1.2, n=10)
-21%
0.88 (0.2 - 3.4, n=743)
-44%
Idle Average *
1.95
1.99
-2%
2
-3%
1.76
10%
2.16
-11%
2.9
-49%
1.903 (1.4 - 2.2, n=10)
2%
1.733 (0.6 - 6.2, n=742)
11%
Idle Maximum *
2.03
2.05
-1%
2.11
-4%
1.78
12%
2.18
-7%
3.5
-72%
2.21 (1.54 - 4.1, n=10)
-9%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=743)
-0%
Load Average *
4.56
4.62
-1%
3.9
14%
4.47
2%
4.48
2%
4.8
-5%
4.61 (3.47 - 8.2, n=10)
-1%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=737)
11%
Load Maximum *
9.15
8.94
2%
5.62
39%
9.13
-0%
7.87
14%
11.2
-22%
8.22 (5.93 - 12.2, n=10)
10%
5.88 (1.2 - 14.2, n=737)
36%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
32h 30min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12h 48min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15h 40min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 19min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
3350 mAh
Huawei P20 Lite
3000 mAh
Nokia 7 Plus
3800 mAh
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
3100 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-29%
-35%
-22%
-31%
-17%
Reader / Idle
1950
1678
-14%
750
-62%
1703
-13%
1374
-30%
1401
-28%
H.264
940
662
-30%
470
-50%
706
-25%
658
-30%
921
-2%
WiFi v1.3
768
547
-29%
582
-24%
672
-12%
605
-21%
694
-10%
Load
259
150
-42%
247
-5%
158
-39%
145
-44%
191
-26%

Pros

+ 4800万像素
+ 耐用
+ 几乎无边框的屏幕
+ 可扩展存储
+ 支持USB C和3.5 mm插孔耳机
+ 整洁的机身
+ 双SIM

Cons

- 混合SIM插槽
- 系统只支持英文
- 没有IP认证
- 不支持DRM L1
- 没有NFC
- LTE频段少
- 单扬声器
- 摄像头突起明显
红米Note 7智能手机评测 supplied by
红米Note 7智能手机评测 supplied by

那么,具有高像素相机和其他中档硬件的小米手机如何在竞争中脱颖而出?

Note 7与P20 Lite相比具有明显的优势。这不仅仅是在原始性能方面,而且在其他领域也有所体现,如Wi-Fi性能和续航时间。

高通的竞争力相当均衡。根据存储配置,价格在999-1599元之间。因此,可供选择的细节包括额外的功能和外观,尽管其他三位竞品的相机像素根本无法与Note相媲美。

红米Note 7是一款优秀的中档智能手机; 48万像素摄像头是它的标志性功能。

客观来讲,我们可以欣赏来自小米的功能性MIUI,它提供了比我们在本次评论中所涵盖的更多的功能。不过中国模式还包含许多不必要的软件,而且一些AI功能显然不能在欧洲使用。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 - 03/12/2019 v6
Inge Schwabe

Chassis
80%
Keyboard
66 / 75 → 88%
Pointing Device
82%
Connectivity
43 / 60 → 72%
Weight
89%
Battery
96%
Display
88%
Games Performance
54 / 63 → 86%
Application Performance
61 / 70 → 87%
Temperature
93%
Noise
100%
Audio
64 / 91 → 70%
Camera
75%
Average
76%
85%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 红米Note 7智能手机评测
Inge Schwabe, 2019-04-25 (Update: 2019-04-25)