Notebookcheck Logo

小米Redmi Note 11S智能手机评测--90Hz AMOLED和108MP摄像头,售价200欧元(约199美元)。

勤俭节约的人。 虽然小米Redmi Note 11S的官方价格只有200欧元(约199美元),但它仍然提供了广泛的设备。这款6.43英寸智能手机的亮点是其90赫兹的AMOLED面板,它提供了非常好的图像质量。此外,设备还包括一个108万像素的摄像头,一个5000毫安时的电池,以及一个用于快速充电的33瓦的充电器。我们的测试表明它是否值得购买。
Android Smartphone Touchscreen
小米Redmi Note 11S

那些不想花超过400欧元(约398美元)购买智能手机的人将在小米的红米系列中找到他们需要的东西。然而,目前的红米阵容以智能手机开始,甚至明显更实惠。你可以从五款中档智能手机中挑选,官方价格在170欧元(Redmi Note 11)到370欧元(Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G)。尽管他们的价格实惠,但总是有一个AMOLED显示屏。

对于那些将价格限制设定在200欧元的人来说,我们的Redmi Note 11S测试装置可能是一个很好的选择。这款6.43英寸的Android 智能手机配备了 联发科Helio G96和其集成的 ARM Mali-G57 MC2图形单元。此外,还有6GB的内存,高达128GB的存储空间,以及其他功能,如108MP的摄像头和33瓦的快速充电。我们的测试显示了Redmi Note 11S在日常操作中的表现。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S (Redmi Note 12 Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio G96 8 x 2 - 2.1 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
6 GB 
, LPDDR4X
Display
6.43 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 409 PPI, capacitive, AMOLED, FHD+, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 64 GB 
, 42 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio port, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB (exFAT supported), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: proximity sensor, accelerometer, electronic compass, gyroscope, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3, IR blaster
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Bands 1/2/4/5/8), 4G (Bands 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/20/28/38/40/41), Head SAR 0.595 W/kg , Body SAR 0.936 W/kg , Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.09 x 159.87 x 73.87
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 108 MPix (Samsung HM2, f/1.9, 1/1.52", 0.7µm) + 8MP ultrawide camera (f/2.2, FOV 118°) + 2MP macro camera (f/2.4) + 2MP depth camera (f/2.4), videos up to 1080p@30fps
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.4, videos up to 1080p @ 30fps
Additional features
Speakers: dual speakers, Keyboard: virtual, 33W charger, USB cable (type A to C), SIM tool, protective case, quick start guide, warranty card, MIUI 13, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
179 g, Power Supply: 88 g
Price
200 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
80 %
09/2022
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2
179 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.43"2400x1080
78.9 %
01/2022
Motorola Moto G31
Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2
181 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.40"2400x1080
77.6 %
05/2022
Realme C35
T616, Mali-G57 MP1
189 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2408x1080
78.5 %
03/2022
Nokia G21
T606, Mali-G57 MP1
190 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
78.1 %
08/2021
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2
186 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.40"1600x720
81.1 %
08/2021
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4
178.8 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.43"2400x1080
80 %
05/2022
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
SD 680, Adreno 610
179 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.43"2400x1080

外壳 - 一个没有IP认证的轻型塑料外壳

小米提供Redmi Note 11S,颜色为石墨灰、珍珠白和暮光蓝。它的磨砂表面使这个重量为179克(约6.3盎司)的小米手机相当不容易沾染指纹。

Redmi Note 11S的外壳以非常好的工艺给人留下深刻印象。边框和后盖都由塑料制成,与AMOLED面板一起形成一个稳定的单元。虽然电源键和音量摇杆在边框中的位置不是很紧,但它们仍然提供了一个非常好的压力点。

然而,与它的Redmi Note 10S前代产品相比,我们的测试装置失去了一些坚固性,因为夏米为其后续产品取消了IP53认证。制造商并没有说明对显示屏玻璃的保护方式。在交付状态下,有一个保护膜覆盖着显示屏。

除了一些细节之外,Redmi Note 11S和Redmi Note 10S的外观是相似的。显示屏继续占正面的84%左右,自拍镜仍然放在顶部显示屏边缘中央的打孔下面。背面持有一个四摄像头系统,其核心元素是一个108MP的传感器。

小米Redmi Note 11S
小米Redmi Note 11S
小米Redmi Note 11S
小米Redmi Note 11S
小米Redmi Note 11S
小米Redmi Note 11S
小米Redmi Note 11S
小米Redmi Note 11S
小米Redmi Note 11S
小米Redmi Note 11S
小米Redmi Note 11S
小米Redmi Note 11S

尺寸比较

164.6 mm 75.9 mm 8.5 mm 190 g164.4 mm 75.6 mm 8.1 mm 189 g161.9 mm 73.9 mm 8.6 mm 181 g160.46 mm 74.5 mm 8.29 mm 178.8 g159.87 mm 73.87 mm 8.09 mm 179 g159.87 mm 73.87 mm 8.09 mm 179 g159.3 mm 73.6 mm 8.4 mm 186 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备 - 具有10秒限制的始终开启功能

你可以从两个小米Redmi Note 11S型号中选择不同的存储尺寸。这款智能手机在制造商的网店中仅售200欧元,配备6GB LPDDR4X-RAM和64GB的UFS 2.2存储。另一方面,在我们测试的时候,第二个版本的128GB存储空间价格完全相同,所以你可以安全地忽略64GB版本。

与前代产品相比,小米Redmi Note 11S的设备几乎没有变化。它仍然缺乏5G支持和通知LED。同时,这款智能手机仍然非常适用于日常任务。除了microSD读卡器,它还包括一个3.5毫米音频端口,支持双SIM卡,一个支持USB-OTG的USB-C 2.0端口,立体声扬声器,一个红外传感器,蓝牙5.0,以及用于非接触式支付的NFC。

Redmi Note 11S的设备还包括一个永远在线的功能。然而,显示屏并不是持续活动的,而只是在你点击屏幕后10秒内显示时间和电池电量等信息。

左边:双SIM卡/MicroSD插槽
左边:双SIM卡/MicroSD插槽
右边:带指纹传感器的电源键,音量摇杆
右边:带指纹传感器的电源键,音量摇杆
顶部:红外辐射器、扬声器、3.5毫米音频接口
顶部:红外辐射器、扬声器、3.5毫米音频接口
底部:麦克风、USB-C 2.0、扬声器
底部:麦克风、USB-C 2.0、扬声器

微型SD卡读卡器

智能手机在使用我们的Angelbird AV Pro V60 microSD参考卡时达到了稳定的传输速率。然而,一段时间后,在连续读取时,传输率明显下降。另一方面,在复制测试中,Redmi Note 11S的速度几乎是其前辈的两倍。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
44.2 MB/s +24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
35.73 MB/s
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
24.74 MB/s -31%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
20.6 MB/s -42%
Realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
20.5 MB/s -43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
18.76 MB/s -47%
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
17.7 MB/s -50%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36.5 (25.2-45.7)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø71.4 (33.3-76.8)

软件 - MIUI 13和升级到Android 12

在这一点上,Redmi Note 11S运行的是Android 12,尽管它一开始是Android 11。伴随着小米的MIUI 13版用户界面。在我们测试的时候(8月底),Android 安全补丁是2022年6月1日的水平,所以它们仍然是相当最新的。

你可以删除所有预装的第三方应用程序,如Facebook、Spotify和AliExpress。对DRM Widevine L1的支持也使你能够以高清质量播放视频流。

小米Redmi Note 11S
小米Redmi Note 11S
小米Redmi Note 11S
小米Redmi Note 11S
小米Redmi Note 11S
小米Redmi Note 11S
小米Redmi Note 11S
小米Redmi Note 11S

通信和GNSS - 4G,稳定的Wi-Fi 5,以及精确的GPS

Redmi Note 11S在移动通信方面不是特别有天赋。5G不被支持,而且只有12个支持4G的频段。然而,由于20和28频段也包括在支持的频段中,你应该不会遇到任何接收问题,至少在欧洲地区。

Redmi Note 11S还通过蓝牙5.0、NFC和Wi-Fi 5进行通信。通过我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器,小米智能手机实现了非常稳定的WLAN传输速率。平均约为340 Mbit/s,它们属于你可以从Wi-Fi 5期望的范围。此外,作为我们的对比设备,Redmi Note 11S在WLAN中的整体速度略快。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=205, last 2 years)
648 MBit/s +99%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
325 (289min - 340max) MBit/s
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
299 (224min - 315max) MBit/s -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
298 (198min - 345max) MBit/s -8%
Realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
244 (179min - 255max) MBit/s -25%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=206, last 2 years)
683 MBit/s +88%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
364 (176min - 384max) MBit/s
Realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
347 (309min - 366max) MBit/s -5%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
339 (328min - 362max) MBit/s -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
322 (162min - 386max) MBit/s -12%
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
346 (267min - 353max) MBit/s
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
346 (334min - 352max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
283 (145min - 322max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Smartphone
  (last 2 years)
376 MBit/s
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
353 (261min - 359max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
328 (255min - 340max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
320 (299min - 340max) MBit/s
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360380Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø325 (289-340)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø358 (176-384)
室内的GPS接收
室内的GPS接收
室外的GPS接收
室外的GPS接收

小米智能手机使用GPS(L1)、Glonass(E1)、Galileo(E1)和Beidou(B1)卫星导航系统确定其当前位置。在我们的测试中,它不仅迅速成功,而且在这方面非常准确。通过GPS测试应用程序,Redmi Note 11S在室内达到了2米(约6.6英尺)的精度,在室外甚至能够提高到1米(约3.3英尺)。

小米智能手机也非常适用于日常导航任务。Redmi Note 11S在大约10公里(约6.2英里)的自行车骑行过程中记录的路线与佳明Venu2健身追踪器一样准确。

GPS测试:概述
GPS测试:概述
GPS测试:环湖
GPS测试:环湖
GPS测试:转折点
GPS测试:转折点

电话功能和语音质量

小米的双SIM卡智能手机支持VoLTE和WLAN通话。在我们的测试中,它提供了一个良好的语音质量。在拨打固定电话或移动电话时,Redmi Note 11S可以将对话双方的声音清晰地传递给对方,而且容易理解。在扬声器模式下,通信也很容易成功,大声的噪音被相当可靠地过滤掉。

除了两张Nano-SIM卡外,卡盘还提供了一个可容纳1TB数据的microSD卡的空间。在0.595 W/kg(头部SAR)和SAR 0.936 W/kg(身体SAR),辐射值相对较低。

摄像头 - 四个摄像头,108MP

用自拍相机拍摄的照片
用自拍相机拍摄的照片

Redmi Note 11S的自拍相机提供1600万像素的分辨率,并以每秒30帧的1080p分辨率录制视频。它成功地拍摄了扎实的人像照片,细节清晰可见,颜色看起来很自然。你可以使用美容模式来优化图像。

108MP的主摄像头使用三星HM2作为图像传感器(f/1.9,1/1.52")。通过9-in-1像素分选,它可以拍摄1200万像素的照片,并由两个200万像素的传感器支持,用于微距和深度记录。当与更昂贵的智能手机的图像质量相比较时,Redmi Note 11S当然会输,但对于其价格级别来说,它仍然创造了非常体面的照片。

在最佳光线条件下,用108MP相机拍摄的照片看起来不错,特别是如果你将它们与Redmi Note 11的照片进行比较。由于其更大的图像传感器和更高的像素储备量,Redmi Note 11S能够比其红米兄弟姐妹明显捕捉到更多的图像细节。此外,颜色鲜艳,图像对比度丰富。 另一方面,主摄像头只在变焦记录中产生浑浊的细节。在夜间拍摄时,你也不得不接受一些妥协,因为它们很快就会变得模糊不清。

超广角摄像头(f/2.2)提供118度的视角,具有800万像素的分辨率。就质量而言,它无法与主摄像头竞争,因为它产生的图像即使在最好的光线条件下也会有明显的噪音,而且在相当低的清晰度水平下运行。

相比之下Redmi Note 10S相比,视频特性变得更糟。与前者的联发科Helio G95 相比,后者的 联发科Helio G96Redmi Note 11S不允许录制4K视频,而只允许在30FPS下录制最多1080p的视频。在录制视频时,在主摄像头和超广角摄像头之间切换是不可能的。

用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用超广角相机拍摄的照片
用超广角相机拍摄的照片

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Tageslicht-Aufnahme 1Tageslicht-Aufnahme 2Ultraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLowlight-Aufnahme

我们的测试实验室显示,在最佳光线条件下,主摄像头能够相当准确地再现色彩(最大Delta-E为12.3)。此外,我们的测试图的图片直到边缘都很清晰。然而,在只有1勒克斯的低光下,都无法再识别。

ColorChecker
4.1 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S: 6.84 ∆E min: 1.93 - max: 12.3 ∆E
ColorChecker
30 ∆E
55.5 ∆E
40.2 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
46.1 ∆E
62.8 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
65.5 ∆E
64.5 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
38.2 ∆E
76.8 ∆E
45 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
94.3 ∆E
71.7 ∆E
52.9 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S: 47.58 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 94.33 ∆E

配件和保修 - 33瓦的充电器和保护罩

与小米Redmi Note 11S一起,还包括一个33瓦的充电器、USB线(Type-A转C)、SIM卡工具、保护罩和快速入门手册。制造商在其在线商店中没有为该智能手机提供任何特殊配件。

小米Redmi Note 11S的保修期为12个月。

输入设备和操作 - 响应式显示

由于其高达180赫兹的触摸扫描率,Redmi Note 11S的电容式触摸屏对输入的反应非常迅速,非常准确地执行。90赫兹的刷新率使动画和滚动菜单和网站的操作变得非常流畅。

你可以使用集成在电源按钮上的指纹传感器以生物识别方式解锁智能手机。这很快就能成功,而且识别率也很高。在良好的光线条件下,通过二维人脸识别进行认证的速度同样快,尽管作为一个纯粹的软件解决方案,其安全性不如指纹传感器。

键盘 - 横向
键盘 - 横向
键盘 - 纵向
键盘 - 纵向

显示屏 - AMOLED面板,90赫兹

子像素网格
子像素网格

Redmi Note 11S的AMOLED显示屏提供2400 x 1080像素的分辨率,可以调整为60或90赫兹的固定帧率。没有像一些旗舰级智能手机那样的自适应控制。不支持HDR。

在平均435.9cd/m²的情况下,AMOLED面板实现了坚实的亮度,但我们的测试装置既没有达到其Redmi Note 10S前辈的亮度,也没有达到其目前的Redmi Note 11兄弟姐妹机型的亮度。

小米承诺Redmi Note 11S的亮度水平高达1000尼特,但我们测量其显示屏的最大亮度为577 cd/m²(APL50测量值)。在没有激活亮度传感器的情况下,最高为436 cd/m²。在最低的亮度水平下,显示屏仍然产生2.42 cd/m²。

AMOLED屏幕使用脉宽调制进行亮度控制。在显示器亮度低于54%时,PWM闪烁的频率范围相当高,在174.5和401.7赫兹之间。在显示屏亮度大于54%时,频率为恒定的90赫兹,振幅水平非常平坦和均匀。

441
cd/m²
429
cd/m²
432
cd/m²
443
cd/m²
430
cd/m²
437
cd/m²
443
cd/m²
435
cd/m²
433
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 443 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 435.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.42 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 430 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.43
Motorola Moto G31
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.40
Realme C35
IPS, 2408x1080, 6.60
Nokia G21
IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Super AMOLED, 1600x720, 6.40
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.43
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.43
Screen
-33%
-124%
-169%
-168%
-6%
27%
Brightness middle
430
423
-2%
585
36%
492
14%
349
-19%
706
64%
702
63%
Brightness
436
425
-3%
558
28%
484
11%
352
-19%
701
61%
701
61%
Brightness Distribution
97
94
-3%
89
-8%
86
-11%
92
-5%
98
1%
98
1%
Black Level *
0.6
0.46
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.2
1.58
-32%
4.4
-267%
6.02
-402%
5.87
-389%
2.1
-75%
1
17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.6
4.68
-80%
8.77
-237%
9.13
-251%
15.51
-497%
4.9
-88%
2.3
12%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.5
2.7
-80%
5.9
-293%
7.1
-373%
2.7
-80%
1.5
-0%
1.4
7%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.219 99%
2.228 99%
2.345 94%
2.07 106%
2.29 96%
2.2 100%
CCT
6379 102%
6674 97%
8001 81%
8918 73%
6970 93%
6447 101%
6520 100%
Contrast
975
1070

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 401.7 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 401.7 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 401.7 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18080 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最小显示亮度
分钟。
25%的显示亮度
25%
50%的显示亮度
50%
75%的显示亮度
75%
最大手动显示亮度
100%

具有固定变焦水平和各种亮度设置的测量系列

你可以在显示设置中选择 "鲜艳"、"饱和 "和 "标准 "颜色预设。此外,你也可以调整色温。从 "鲜艳 "切换到 "标准 "预设时,你会得到最佳的色彩再现。正如我们用CalMAN软件和光谱光度计进行的测量所显示的那样,AMOLED面板随后将只有最小的颜色偏差,所有这些偏差也都在理想的目标范围内。

色彩准确度(标准预设,sRGB色彩目标空间)
色彩准确度(标准预设,sRGB色彩目标空间)
色彩空间(标准预设,sRGB色彩目标空间)。
色彩空间(标准预设,sRGB色彩目标空间)。
灰度(标准预设,sRGB颜色目标空间)
灰度(标准预设,sRGB颜色目标空间)
饱和度(标准预设,sRGB颜色目标空间)。
饱和度(标准预设,sRGB颜色目标空间)。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.7065 ms rise
↘ 0.7505 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.63 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.8288 ms rise
↘ 0.7988 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).

在户外,Redmi Note 11S打出了一个好数字。如果你避免阳光直射,显示屏上的内容可以毫无障碍地阅读。由于AMOLED面板的高视角稳定性,在非常陡峭的侧视角度下也能正常工作。

在户外使用(阳光直射)
在户外使用(阳光直射)
在户外使用(在阴凉处)。
在户外使用(在阴凉处)。
视角
视角

性能 - 与前代产品相比,几乎没有任何改进

小米Redmi Note 11S使用 联发科Helio G96处理器。这款采用12纳米工艺生产的八核SoC提供了高达2.05GHz的时钟速度,并由集成的 ARM Mali-G57 MC2图形单元的支持。Helio G96配有LPDDR4X内存、UFS 2.2存储和4G移动通信。

Redmi Note 11S在几乎所有的合成基准测试中都比对比设备快,也击败了Redmi Note 11系列的入门级机型,即Redmi Note 11骁龙680.然而,与前代产品相比,我们的测试设备几乎无法向前推进。在AnTuTu v9和PCMark基准测试中,10S的性能表现为 Redmi Note 10S甚至更快。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=214, last 2 years)
900 Points +70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
528 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G96
  (466 - 530, n=3)
508 Points -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
507 Points -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
384 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
364 Points -31%
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
353 Points -33%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
312 Points -41%
Realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
298 Points -44%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=214, last 2 years)
2947 Points +58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1863 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G96
  (1688 - 1863, n=3)
1769 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1738 Points -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
1685 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1370 Points -26%
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1295 Points -30%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1185 Points -36%
Realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1184 Points -36%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=151, last 2 years)
738649 Points +149%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
330876 Points +11%
Average Mediatek Helio G96
  (297002 - 363022, n=2)
330012 Points +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
297002 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
252044 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
204547 Points -31%
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
191865 Points -35%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=209, last 2 years)
11643 Points +43%
Average Mediatek Helio G96
  (8115 - 9209, n=3)
8540 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
8236 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
8115 Points
Realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
8066 Points -1%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
7805 Points -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
7694 Points -5%
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
6596 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
6570 Points -19%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (200 - 1474, n=160, last 2 years)
830 Points +89%
Average Mediatek Helio G96
  (440 - 518, n=2)
479 Points +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
440 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
388 Points -12%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=162, last 2 years)
5686 Points +111%
Average Mediatek Helio G96
  (2696 - 3072, n=2)
2884 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2738 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2696 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2346 Points -13%
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2229 Points -17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
1566 Points -42%
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=162, last 2 years)
9595 Points +91%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
5794 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
5353 Points +7%
Average Mediatek Helio G96
  (5016 - 5684, n=2)
5350 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
5016 Points
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4366 Points -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2083 Points -58%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12306, n=162, last 2 years)
6206 Points +89%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
3824 Points +17%
Average Mediatek Helio G96
  (3280 - 4282, n=2)
3781 Points +15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3280 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2843 Points -13%
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2691 Points -18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
1012 Points -69%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=162, last 2 years)
13856 Points +401%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3178 Points +15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2763 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G96
  (2666 - 2763, n=2)
2715 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2183 Points -21%
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1838 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1811 Points -34%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=162, last 2 years)
1487 Points +28%
Average Mediatek Helio G96
  (1163 - 1372, n=2)
1268 Points +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1199 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1163 Points
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1143 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1099 Points -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
898 Points -23%
AImark - Score v2.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (1043 - 139804, n=54, last 2 years)
20600 Points +168%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
7697 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G96
 
7697 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7242 Points -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
6118 Points -21%
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
5912 Points -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
4995 Points -35%
Realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
4725 Points -39%

由于带有 ARM Mali-G57 MC2由于采用了ARM Mali-G57 MC2,Redmi Note 11S使用了比10S更弱的图形单元。 Redmi Note 10S但前者在图形基准测试中更快。总的来说,Redmi Note 11S在这里只处于中间位置。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
326 Points
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
181 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
174 Points -47%
Realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
129 Points -60%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
127 Points -61%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
111 Points -66%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1003 Points
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
717 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
686 Points -32%
Realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
464 Points -54%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
435 Points -57%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
393 Points -61%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1181 Points
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
719 Points -39%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
679 Points -43%
Realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
463 Points -61%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
447 Points -62%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
397 Points -66%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2628 Points +21%
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2488 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2423 Points +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2375 Points +10%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2298 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2168 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2110 Points -3%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2845 Points +24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2286 Points
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1271 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1224 Points -46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1155 Points -49%
Realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
919 Points -60%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
783 Points -66%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2641 Points +17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2259 Points
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1426 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1375 Points -39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1253 Points -45%
Realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1074 Points -52%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
917 Points -59%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3036 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2675 Points +10%
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2603 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2573 Points +6%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2559 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2488 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2434 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2743 Points +17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2341 Points
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1267 Points -46%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1211 Points -48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1199 Points -49%
Realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
939 Points -60%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
814 Points -65%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2682 Points +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2361 Points
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1430 Points -39%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1379 Points -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1372 Points -42%
Realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1109 Points -53%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
959 Points -59%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2957 Points +30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2654 Points +16%
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2601 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2565 Points +12%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2400 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2372 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2281 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3558 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3453 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1995 Points -42%
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1674 Points -52%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1604 Points -54%
Realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1471 Points -57%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1236 Points -64%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3202 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3099 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2113 Points -32%
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1818 Points -41%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1750 Points -44%
Realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1656 Points -47%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1385 Points -55%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2587 Points +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2383 Points
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1408 Points -41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1365 Points -43%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1354 Points -43%
Realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1103 Points -54%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
945 Points -60%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2633 Points +15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2280 Points
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1246 Points -45%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1198 Points -47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1188 Points -48%
Realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
935 Points -59%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
806 Points -65%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2959 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2829 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2683 Points -5%
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2578 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2492 Points -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2436 Points -14%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2379 Points -16%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3274 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3120 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2085 Points -36%
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1785 Points -45%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1783 Points -46%
Realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1710 Points -48%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1414 Points -57%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3648 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3335 Points -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1931 Points -47%
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1633 Points -55%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1630 Points -55%
Realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1518 Points -58%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1255 Points -66%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3063 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2654 Points +10%
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2644 Points +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2589 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2547 Points +6%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2546 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2410 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
60 fps +15%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
59 fps +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
52 fps
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
40 fps -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
37 fps -29%
Realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps -56%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
85 fps +35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
63 fps
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
45 fps -29%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
44 fps -30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
42 fps -33%
Realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps -59%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
49 fps +58%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
42 fps +35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
31 fps
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
22 fps -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -45%
Realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps -55%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
52 fps +37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
38 fps
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
25 fps -34%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
24 fps -37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps -47%
Realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps -58%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
31 fps +55%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
30 fps +50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps -30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps -35%
Realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.7 fps -56%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
32 fps +28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
16 fps -36%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps -36%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps -40%
Realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.9 fps -60%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps +50%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
16 fps +33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.5 fps -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.3 fps -39%
Realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5 fps -58%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps +27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
9.6 fps -36%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
9.3 fps -38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.6 fps -43%
Realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.9 fps -61%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps +41%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
9.5 fps +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.5 fps
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6 fps -29%
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5.4 fps -36%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5 fps -41%
Realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.4 fps -60%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.4 fps +30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.7 fps
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3.5 fps -39%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
3.3 fps -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.2 fps -44%
Realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.2 fps -61%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2 fps -65%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps +46%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
17 fps +31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
9.5 fps -27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.8 fps -32%
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.4 fps -35%
Realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.4 fps -58%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps +25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.8 fps -39%
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
9.6 fps -40%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
9.2 fps -42%
Realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.1 fps -62%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5.2 fps -67%

在浏览器基准测试中,Redmi Note 11S提供了一个良好的性能。网站的渲染速度相当快,然后还可以流畅地滚动。11S有一个相当大的优势,那就是 Redmi Note 10S的优势可能主要是由于它的浏览器版本比较新。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=170, last 2 years)
103.9 Points +144%
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (42.5 - 62.2, n=2)
52.4 Points +23%
Realme C35 (Chrome 101)
45.399 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101)
43.525 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S (Chrome 104.0.5112.97)
42.542 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G (Chrome 92)
31.57 Points -26%
Motorola Moto G31 (Chrome 97)
31.19 Points -27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)
16.92 Points -60%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=154, last 2 years)
104.4 runs/min +203%
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (34.4 - 52.7, n=2)
43.6 runs/min +27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101)
39.64 runs/min +15%
Realme C35
34.44 runs/min 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S (Chrome 104.0.5112.97)
34.4 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G (Chome 92)
29.1 runs/min -15%
Motorola Moto G31 (Chome 97)
27.9 runs/min -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)
14.7 runs/min -57%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (37 - 304, n=119, last 2 years)
131 Points +138%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101)
67 Points +22%
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (55 - 77, n=2)
66 Points +20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S (Chrome 104.0.5112.97)
55 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G (Chrome 92)
51 Points -7%
Motorola Moto G31 (Chrome 97)
45 Points -18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)
28 Points -49%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=205, last 2 years)
33314 Points +92%
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (17394 - 19873, n=2)
18634 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S (Chrome 104.0.5112.97)
17394 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101)
13056 Points -25%
Motorola Moto G31 (Chrome 97)
11597 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G (Chrome 92)
11313 Points -35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)
4808 Points -72%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)
10797 ms * -289%
Motorola Moto G31 (Chrome 97)
3469 ms * -25%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G (Chrome 92)
3349 ms * -21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101)
3234.1 ms * -17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S (Chrome 104.0.5112.97)
2773.2 ms *
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (2560 - 2773, n=2)
2667 ms * +4%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=168, last 2 years)
1658 ms * +40%

* ... smaller is better

Redmi Note 11S与10S相比,实现了最大的性能提升。 Redmi Note 10S在存储性能方面实现了最大的飞跃。尽管有了UFS 2.2,它在名义上使用相同的存储类型,但在随机读取和写入访问方面明显更快。然而,由于顺序传输率几乎没有差别,应用程序的加载时间也大致相同。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11SMotorola Moto G31Realme C35Nokia G21Samsung Galaxy A22 4GXiaomi Redmi Note 10SXiaomi Redmi Note 11Average 64 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-50%
-2%
-62%
-56%
-29%
11%
-3%
90%
Sequential Read 256KB
524.39
309.8
-41%
907.1
73%
257.6
-51%
297.7
-43%
498.8
-5%
895.34
71%
758 ?(485 - 940, n=17)
45%
1471 ?(215 - 4512, n=213, last 2 years)
181%
Sequential Write 256KB
446.46
221.5
-50%
271.1
-39%
180.6
-60%
183
-59%
372
-17%
519.23
16%
400 ?(120.6 - 519, n=17)
-10%
1084 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=213, last 2 years)
143%
Random Read 4KB
214.82
84
-61%
137.8
-36%
74
-66%
101.2
-53%
110.5
-49%
172.95
-19%
154.9 ?(88.5 - 220, n=17)
-28%
243 ?(22.2 - 543, n=213, last 2 years)
13%
Random Write 4KB
216.24
109.8
-49%
206.4
-5%
60.2
-72%
66.9
-69%
121
-44%
163.29
-24%
176.3 ?(95.4 - 216, n=17)
-18%
267 ?(13 - 709, n=213, last 2 years)
23%

游戏--可实现流畅的游戏体验

芯片ARM Mali-G57 MC2Redmi Note 11S中使用的图形单元能够流畅地显示游戏,只要图形细节不设置得太高。例如,在《PUBG》移动版中,在高清/高的设置下,可以实现30FPS的恒定。在图形较简单的游戏中,如Armajet和Subway Surfers,帧率甚至在60FPS左右。然而,Armajet的不同帧率也表明,SoC在这里已经达到了它的性能极限。

我们用我们的Gamebench来测量游戏的帧率。测试工具测量游戏的帧率。

氩氦刀
氩氦刀
PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø58.3 (51-61)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S; PUBG Mobile; 2.1.0: Ø29.9 (27-31)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S; Subway Surfers; 2.38.0: Ø59.7 (53-61)

排放 - 始终保持低温运行

温度

当运行时,Redmi Note 11S从未超过手部温度。经过一个小时的持续压力测试,我们测量到小米智能手机表面的最高温度只有36.3℃(97.3°F)。它几乎在任何时候都能使用其全部SoC性能。我们在3DMark Wild Life压力测试中测得的性能下降是如此之小,以至于没有意义。

Max. Load
 36.3 °C35.6 °C32.6 °C 
 35.7 °C34.7 °C33.8 °C 
 33.9 °C32.6 °C32.3 °C 
Maximum: 36.3 °C
Average: 34.2 °C
31.9 °C34.4 °C36.1 °C
32.4 °C32.6 °C35.2 °C
32.4 °C33.8 °C34.7 °C
Maximum: 36.1 °C
Average: 33.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  27.8 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
99.3 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
99.2 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.1 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.2 %
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
98.9 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
97.9 % -1%
01234567Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø1.969 (1.96-1.976)
Motorola Moto G31 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.7.2: Ø1.091 (1.086-1.099)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.4.2: Ø1.052 (1.037-1.059)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø6.96 (6.93-7)
Motorola Moto G31 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.33 (4.31-4.34)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.15 (4.13-4.17)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.68 (2.66-2.69)

发言人

Redmi Note 11S的设备包括立体声扬声器,这在高达200欧元(约199美元)的价格范围内是个例外。作为典型的智能手机,双扬声器听起来相当薄,但仍能相当好地再现声音。然而,低音是罕见的。另一方面,音频端口听起来很干净,没有噪音,信噪比达到了93dBFS。

你可以使用3.5毫米音频端口或蓝牙5.0连接外部音频设备与Redmi Note 11S。通常的蓝牙音频编解码器,如AAC、SBC、LDHC、aptX、aptX HD和aptX Adaptive都受到支持。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.640.6252935.93127.826.84025.837.75032.536.96322.427.28024.526.210019.42112516.520.416018.438.820012.843.12509.947.931511.350.640013.153.450011.459.46301162.280011.663.7100012.365.712501270.8160012.471.9200012.272.925001373.9315012.873.8400013.278500013.479.3630013.871.9800013.368.11000013.365.91250013.570.11600013.165.2SPL24.985.5N0.657.5median 13median 65.7Delta0.810.93032.926.725.625.624.526.121.636.434.629.222.62528.217.824.918.328.818.638.917.442.214.247.815.955.912.857.81462.713.368.712.274.412.376.411.977.912.876.212.777.512.17812.978.713.28013.47913.677.213.473.113.970.5147114.266.725.288.90.775median 13.4median 73.11.211.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Note 11SXiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 稳固但不突出

消耗功率

小米智能手机可以使用附带的33瓦特充电器快速充电。在我们的测试中,将5000毫安时的电池从0充到80%需要37分钟。然后,电池在52分钟后被完全充满。

有趣的是,充电的速度几乎没有小米Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G兄弟机型的充电速度为51分钟,尽管该智能手机使用67瓦的充电器。虽然Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G在开始时充电较快,但随后充电曲线下降得相当快,最后几乎达到相同的充电时间。

Redmi Note 11S的耗电量并不显眼。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.04 / 0.18 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.89 / 1.87 / 1.9 Watt
Load midlight 3.01 / 6.26 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G31
5000 mAh
Realme C35
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
5000 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio G96
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
11%
19%
-17%
11%
4%
-9%
-16%
Idle Minimum *
0.89
0.7
21%
0.8
10%
1.5
-69%
0.69
22%
1.06
-19%
0.945 ?(0.89 - 1, n=2)
-6%
0.896 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=159, last 2 years)
-1%
Idle Average *
1.87
0.9
52%
1.1
41%
2.1
-12%
1.46
22%
1.93
-3%
1.585 ?(1.3 - 1.87, n=2)
15%
1.449 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=159, last 2 years)
23%
Idle Maximum *
1.9
1.3
32%
1.4
26%
2.5
-32%
1.5
21%
1.96
-3%
1.7 ?(1.5 - 1.9, n=2)
11%
1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=159, last 2 years)
14%
Load Average *
3.01
3.5
-16%
3.1
-3%
2.9
4%
3.67
-22%
2.87
5%
4.41 ?(3.01 - 5.8, n=2)
-47%
5.51 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=159, last 2 years)
-83%
Load Maximum *
6.26
8.5
-36%
5.1
19%
4.9
22%
5.58
11%
3.85
38%
7.43 ?(6.26 - 8.6, n=2)
-19%
8.19 ?(4.32 - 20.8, n=159, last 2 years)
-31%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mediatek Helio G96: Ø3.86 (1.049-8.74)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80: Ø3.8 (0.967-7.64)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G: Ø3.03 (1.109-6.23)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mediatek Helio G96; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.24 (2.98-3.62)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.91 (2.32-5.27)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.88 (2.54-5.23)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mediatek Helio G96; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.144 (1.097-1.297)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.15 (1.9-2.49)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.302 (1.117-1.614)

电池寿命

其5000毫安时的电池为Redmi Note 11S的良好电池寿命做出了贡献。在我们的模拟网络冲浪中,这款智能手机可以持续12小时左右,而在播放视频时,略微超过16小时。然而,在电池容量相同的情况下,所有的对比设备的持续时间仍然明显更长,特别是包括Redmi Note 10S前身。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
27h 43min
WiFi Websurfing
12h 05min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 11min
Load (maximum brightness)
6h 16min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G31
5000 mAh
Realme C35
5000 mAh
Nokia G21
5050 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
16%
32%
50%
40%
47%
16%
Reader / Idle
1663
2140
29%
2867
72%
3612
117%
2098
26%
H.264
971
1294
33%
1297
34%
1172
21%
1076
11%
WiFi v1.3
725
1032
42%
958
32%
1087
50%
1252
73%
1087
50%
842
16%
Load
376
226
-40%
299
-20%
368
-2%
409
9%

Pros

+ 90-Hz AMOLED显示屏
+ 准确的GPS
+ 良好的指纹识别传感器
+ 立体声扬声器
+ 双SIM卡+microSD
+ 可靠的电池寿命和快速充电

Cons

- 部分内容比前代产品差
- 没有IP认证
- 没有全功能的永远在线显示屏
- 视频录制只有1080p

对小米Redmi Note 11S的评判

测试小米Redmi Note 11S。测试装置由NBB.com(notebooksbilliger.de)提供。
测试小米Redmi Note 11S。测试装置由NBB.com(notebooksbilliger.de)提供。

通过Redmi Note 11S,小米提供了一个良好的中低端智能手机。以200欧元(约199美元)的官方价格,那些可以不使用5G的人将得到一部做工良好、日常操作性能稳定的智能手机。该 联发科Helio G96和6GB的内存确保大多数应用程序的运行没有任何问题,延迟成为例外。

以200欧元的价格,小米Redmi Note 11S提供了很多物美价廉的智能手机,包括一个90赫兹的AMOLED屏幕。然而,在某些方面,它比它的前辈更差。

小米智能手机的AMOLED屏幕变得特别有趣,它以90赫兹的刷新率确保了吸引人的流畅操作。除显示屏外,Redmi Note 11S还拥有立体声扬声器、不错的电池寿命和108万像素的摄像头,在最佳光线条件下能成功拍摄出好照片。33瓦的充电器可以快速为智能手机充电。

Redmi Note 11S几乎没有区别于其Redmi Note 10S 前身,除了提供更多最新版本的Android 和支持DRM Widevine L1外,几乎没有任何优势。此外,我们的测试设备在某些方面也没有任何改进:由于改用了联发科Helio G96,图形性能更弱,而且现在不支持4K,只支持全高清视频录制。电池寿命也变差了,而且IP53认证被取消了。因此,从上一代产品升级是不值得的。

小米Redmi Note 11S的替代品是,例如 诺基亚G21三星Galaxy A22 4G这两款手机价格更实惠,性能和设备相似,也提供90Hz的屏幕。然而,只有三星还包括一个AMOLED屏幕。

价格和可用性

在我们测试的时候,128GB版本的Redmi Note 11S,例如从亚马逊购买,价格为246美元小米 公司的网店 也列出了这款智能手机,但没有提供任何在美国的购买选项

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S - 09/01/2022 v7
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
81%
Keyboard
69 / 75 → 92%
Pointing Device
88%
Connectivity
50 / 70 → 71%
Weight
90%
Battery
90%
Display
90%
Games Performance
25 / 64 → 40%
Application Performance
66 / 86 → 76%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
71 / 90 → 78%
Camera
58%
Average
75%
80%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 小米Redmi Note 11S智能手机评测--90Hz AMOLED和108MP摄像头,售价200欧元(约199美元)。
Manuel Masiero, 2022-09- 5 (Update: 2022-09- 5)