Notebookcheck Logo

小米Redmi Note 10S评论。廉价的Android 智能手机是防水和防尘的

经IP53认证。 小米Redmi Note 10S是一款拥有IP认证的低价位智能手机。Redmi Note 10S的价格与它的前辈Redmi Note 9S差不多。然而,它提供的硬件略好。阅读我们的评论,了解Redmi Note 10S提供什么样的用户体验。
Touchscreen Smartphone Android
小米Redmi Note 10S

就像 Redmi Note 9S Redmi Note 10S是为价格敏感的买家准备的。有两个变种,它们有不同的存储容量(64/128GB)。这款Android 智能手机配备了 联发科Helio G95.该 ARM Mali-G76 MP4作为GPU。这款智能手机提供6GB的内存。

我们的审查设备有128GB的内部存储器。在每个部分下面,用户可以从我们的数据库中添加其他设备到对比图中。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Redmi Note Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio G95 8 x 2 - 2.1 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G76 MP4
Memory
6144 MB 
Display
6.43 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 409 PPI, capacitive, AMOLED, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 110 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5-mm combination audio jack, Card Reader: microSD (FAT, FAT32), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: proximity sensor, accelerometer, gyroscope, e-compass, OTG, IR-Blaster
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G GSM (850, 900, 1.800, 1.900 MHz), 3G WCDMA (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8), 4G LTE FDD/TDD (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.29 x 160.46 x 74.5
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix main (1.97", 0.7 μm, f/1.79), 8 MP ultra-wide (118°, f/2.2), 2 MP macro (f/2.4), 2 MP depth (f/2.4)
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix (f/2.45)
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: virtual, Keyboard Light: yes, power supply, usb-c-cable, protection case, sim needle, MIUI 12.5, 12 Months Warranty, SAR (head): 0.599 W/kg, SAR (body): 0.904 W/kg, IP53, Camera2 API: Level 3, SNR: 91,42 dBFS, fanless
Weight
178.8 g, Power Supply: 112 g
Price
280 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Likely Competitors

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
80.9 %
08/2021
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4
178.8 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.43"2400x1080
80.7 %
06/2020
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
SD 720G, Adreno 618
209 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.67"2400x1080
81.4 %
04/2021
realme 8
Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4
177 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.40"2400x1080
78.6 %
05/2021
Oppo A74
SD 662, Adreno 610
175 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.43"2400x1080
84.6 %
04/2021
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
SD 860, Adreno 640
215 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080

小米Redmi Note 10S的中框和背面是由塑料制成的。显示器由康宁大猩猩3号玻璃保护。这款小米智能手机获得了IP53认证,这意味着它是防水和防尘的。制造质量处于一个非常好的水平。

Redmi Note 10S的设计和重量与Redmi Note 10相同。然而,这两款小米智能手机有不同的颜色方案。与Note 9SPoco X3 相比,Note 10S更轻、更薄。

小米Redmi Note 10S
小米Redmi Note 10S
小米Redmi Note 10S
小米Redmi Note 10S
小米Redmi Note 10S
小米Redmi Note 10S

Size Comparison

165.3 mm 76.8 mm 9.4 mm 215 g165.8 mm 76.7 mm 8.8 mm 209 g160.46 mm 74.5 mm 8.29 mm 178.8 g160.6 mm 73.9 mm 8 mm 177 g160.3 mm 73.8 mm 7.95 mm 175 g

连接性 -Android 智能手机,带有红外辐射器和耳机插孔

我们已经提到,用户可以在Redmi Note 10S中插入一个microSD卡。该卡槽可以同时容纳两张nanoSIM卡和一张microSD。这款小米智能手机同时支持VoLTE和WiFi通话。Redmi Note 10S有一个3.5毫米音频插孔和一个USB-C端口,以USB 2.0速度运行。Note 10S支持Camera2 L3 API。不支持Widevine L1,这就是为什么用户将不能以高清质量进行视频流。然而,Android ,这款智能手机有一个通知LED。

左侧:nanoSIM/MicroSD卡插槽
左侧:nanoSIM/MicroSD卡插槽
顶部:扬声器、红外辐射器、麦克风
顶部:扬声器、红外辐射器、麦克风
右侧:音量摇杆,带集成指纹传感器的电源按钮
右侧:音量摇杆,带集成指纹传感器的电源按钮
底部:扬声器、USB-C端口、麦克风、耳机插孔
底部:扬声器、USB-C端口、麦克风、耳机插孔

读卡器

使用我们的参考级microSD卡东芝Exceria Pro M501,Redmi Note 10S在复制JPG文件时实现了18.76MB/s的数据传输率。对于这种类型的设备来说,这是一个正常的结果,但这并不意味着它在大的计划中不是一个非常差的结果。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Oppo A74
Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
36.62 MB/s ∼100% +95%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
18.76 MB/s ∼51%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
15.75 MB/s ∼43% -16%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø42.4 (35.4-50.9)
; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø84.9 (50.7-89.2)

软件--采用MIUI 12的小米智能手机

Redmi Note 10S运行Android 11(在我们审查时的安全补丁级别:2021年5月)。小米智能手机配备了一个被称为MiUI的定制启动器(在我们审查时的当前版本:12.5.6)。虽然主屏幕的布局对大多数Android 用户来说是熟悉的,但软件的其他部分需要一些时间来适应。

Redmi Note 10S配备了一大批预装的应用程序,如Facebook、TikTok和booking.com。还有一些第一方的应用程序,如小米的文件管理器和照片库。不幸的是,预装的应用程序只能被禁用。它们不能被完全卸载。

小米Redmi Note 10S的软件
小米Redmi Note 10S的软件
小米Redmi Note 10S的软件
小米Redmi Note 10S的软件
小米Redmi Note 10S的软件
小米Redmi Note 10S的软件
小米Redmi Note 10S的软件
小米Redmi Note 10S的软件

通信和GNSS - 不适合用于导航

Redmi Note 10S支持以下移动通信标准。GSM、3G、LTE。LTE调制解调器可以在LTE Cat.12速度(最大下载速度:600 Mb/s;最大上传速度:100 Mb/s)。


对于短距离通信,我们的评测设备依赖于NFC、蓝牙5和Wi-Fi 5。通过我们的参考级路由器Netgear Nighthawk AX12,Redmi Note 10S的下载速度可达283 Mb/s,上传速度可达320 Mb/s。与其他竞争者相比,这些都是中等水平的结果。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
652 (326min - 669max) MBit/s ∼100% +130%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1395, n=197, last 2 years)
486 MBit/s ∼75% +72%
realme 8
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
346 (317min - 353max) MBit/s ∼53% +22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
283 (145min - 322max) MBit/s ∼43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
256 (247min - 263max) MBit/s ∼39% -10%
Oppo A74
Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
249 (155min - 290max) MBit/s ∼38% -12%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
486 (425min - 550max) MBit/s ∼100% +52%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1348, n=198, last 2 years)
470 MBit/s ∼97% +47%
realme 8
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
335 (281min - 350max) MBit/s ∼69% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
320 (299min - 340max) MBit/s ∼66%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
286 (225min - 321max) MBit/s ∼59% -11%
Oppo A74
Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
276 (170min - 314max) MBit/s ∼57% -14%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320Tooltip
; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø319 (299-340)
; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø283 (145-322)
室内的GPS测试
室内的GPS测试
户外的GPS测试
户外的GPS测试

对于地理定位,我们的审查设备依赖于以下全球导航卫星系统。GPS、GLONASS、北斗和伽利略。在户外,Android 智能手机的误差范围为2米。我们使用一个被称为GPS测试的应用程序来确定误差范围。

为了确定我们的评测设备在导航方面的准确性,我们带着它去骑车。在这次骑行中,我们也由专业的导航仪Garmin Edge 500陪同。在这里,Redmi Note 10S在正确绘制我们所走的路线方面遇到困难。这可能是由过度的能量管理造成的。然而,在这次骑行中,我们确实关闭了所有可以关闭的节能功能。

小米Redmi Note 10S - 导航
小米Redmi Note 10S - 导航
小米Redmi Note 10S - 导航
小米Redmi Note 10S - 导航
小米Redmi Note 10S - 导航
小米Redmi Note 10S - 导航

电话和通话质量 - 与小米智能手机的稳定连接

电话应用提供了对最喜欢的联系人的直接访问,并允许用户轻松调出拨号盘。还有另外两个标签;一个是通话记录,另一个是保存的联系人。

Redmi Note 10S提供了较高的通话音量。通话两端的声音听起来清晰明了,而且大部分时间都能成功过滤掉背景噪音。

相机 - 适用于快照

用前置摄像头拍摄的自拍
用前置摄像头拍摄的自拍

由于有一个200万像素的深度传感器,Redmi Note 10S的64万像素主摄像头可以产生非常详细的特写照片。色彩看起来非常自然。然而,远处的物体往往变得模糊不清。

800万像素的超广角摄像头能拍出色彩鲜明的照片。不过,用超广角相机拍摄的照片看起来有点颗粒感。在弱光条件下,超广角相机无法捕捉到任何细节。没有光学变焦。使用数码变焦拍摄的照片显得非常模糊。在微距摄影方面,额外的200万像素微距相机的表现比主相机差。

在专业模式下,用户可以为每个摄像头调整快门速度、亮度、ISO和白平衡。没有专业视频模式。用小米智能手机拍摄的视频看起来和照片一样好。视频可以在1080p和720p下以60或30FPS录制。Redmi Note 10S只能以30 FPS录制4K视频。

1300万像素的前置摄像头可以产生良好的自拍效果。颜色看起来很自然。有彩色滤镜和美容模式。自拍相机没有专业模式。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Close-up shotPanoramic shotUltra wide-angle shot5X zoomLow-light shot
click to load images

我们使用X-Rite ColorChecker Passport来进一步检查颜色的准确性。在受控的照明条件下,大多数颜色都有点太暗。在这些照明条件下,我们测试图表的照片显得很有细节。然而,角落看起来相当模糊和冲淡

ColorChecker
2.3 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
5 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S: 6.84 ∆E min: 2.27 - max: 11.4 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.9 ∆E
54.1 ∆E
38.8 ∆E
35.6 ∆E
43.9 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
34 ∆E
42.7 ∆E
26.7 ∆E
65.4 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
29.6 ∆E
48.3 ∆E
37 ∆E
76.1 ∆E
43 ∆E
42.9 ∆E
91 ∆E
70.3 ∆E
51.6 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
24.1 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S: 46.44 ∆E min: 13.76 - max: 91.04 ∆E

附件及保修 - 包装盒中的保护套

除了智能手机本身,Redmi Note 10S的盒子里还有一个带有适当的USB Type-C电缆的USB充电器,一个硅胶套和一个SIM卡拆卸工具。

Redmi Note 10S的保修期为12个月。要了解更多关于保修范围和相关主题,请访问我们的常见问题部分。

输入设备和处理 - 电源按钮中的指纹识别器

Redmi Note 10S配备了Android的标准键盘,这被称为GBoard。它提供了大量的定制选项,适合输入较长的文本。触摸屏对输入的反应是可靠和迅速的。由于屏幕表面非常光滑,拖放功能效果非常好。

指纹传感器被集成到电源按钮中。它非常可靠,但速度不快。面部解锁功能运行良好。

小米Redmi Note 10S - 输入设备
小米Redmi Note 10S - 输入设备
小米Redmi Note 10S - 输入设备
小米Redmi Note 10S - 输入设备

显示屏 - 明亮的AMOLED面板

像素排列
像素排列

小米Redmi Note 10S的6.43英寸AMOLED屏幕的原始分辨率为2400x1080像素。Redmi Note 10S的显示屏可以达到700 cd/m²,这就是为什么它在我们的比较表中占据了首位。在APL50测试中,亮度达到了938 cd/m²的峰值。在禁用环境光传感器的情况下,最大亮度为441 cd/m²。最低亮度为2.63cd/m²。

对于亮度控制,Redmi Note 10S利用脉冲宽度调制(PWM)。频率在123.8和250赫兹之间波动。有一个直接电流调光模式,可以启用它来消除闪烁。在直流调光模式下,没有色彩再现的问题。

PWM高于57%
PWM高于57%
直接电流调光(1 - 100%)。
直接电流调光(1 - 100%)。
700
cd/m²
700
cd/m²
702
cd/m²
693
cd/m²
706
cd/m²
706
cd/m²
701
cd/m²
697
cd/m²
700
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 706 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 700.6 cd/m² Minimum: 2.63 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 706 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.1 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.3
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
91.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.29
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.43
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
realme 8
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.40
Oppo A74
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.43
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Screen
-62%
-27%
-41%
7%
Brightness middle
706
622
-12%
590
-16%
606
-14%
567
-20%
Brightness
701
612
-13%
607
-13%
606
-14%
524
-25%
Brightness Distribution
98
94
-4%
92
-6%
98
0%
87
-11%
Black Level *
0.56
0.57
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.1
3.98
-90%
2.64
-26%
3.6
-71%
1
52%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.9
7.33
-50%
6.85
-40%
6.2
-27%
2.1
57%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.5
4.5
-200%
2.4
-60%
3.3
-120%
1.7
-13%
Gamma
2.29 96%
2.206 100%
2.265 97%
2.31 95%
2.16 102%
CCT
6447 101%
7361 88%
6913 94%
6704 97%
6343 102%
Contrast
1111
995
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
114.9

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 250 Hz ≤ 57 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 57 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19959 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

小米智能手机的AMOLED面板可以实现完美的黑色,因为每个像素都可以完全关闭。色彩再现可以在设置菜单中调整。标准模式是最准确的颜色。在饱和模式下,颜色显得过于饱和。

Redmi Note 10S的默认色彩模式被称为 "自动"。在这种模式下,色温会根据照明环境自动调整。然而,在这种模式下,颜色总是显得太冷。

CalMAN - 色彩准确性(标准模式,sRGB)。
CalMAN - 色彩准确性(标准模式,sRGB)。
CalMAN - 色彩空间覆盖(标准模式,sRGB)。
CalMAN - 色彩空间覆盖(标准模式,sRGB)。
CalMAN - 灰度跟踪(标准模式,sRGB)。
CalMAN - 灰度跟踪(标准模式,sRGB)。
CalMAN - 饱和度(标准模式,sRGB
CalMAN - 饱和度(标准模式,sRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.4 ms rise
↘ 2.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (36.5 ms).

Redmi Note 10S的屏幕在户外是可读的,只要你呆在一个阴凉的地方。即使在阴天,屏幕反射也会被证明是令人困扰的。

小米Redmi Note 10S在阴天的户外。
小米Redmi Note 10S在阴天的户外。
小米Redmi Note 10S在阴天的户外。
小米Redmi Note 10S在阴天的户外。

AMOLED面板的可视角度非常好。然而,在非常尖锐的角度,用户可能会注意到一些颜色的闪烁。

视角
视角

性能 - 与Redmi Note 9S相比,几乎没有改进。

小米Redmi Note 10S采用了两年前的 联发科Helio G95.在我们的基准测试中,该SoC的表现符合预期。相比之下,Redmi Note 10S的性能并没有得到提升。 Redmi Note 9S.事实上,在一些基准测试中,Redmi Note 9S比其继任者更快。然而,Redmi Note 10S的表现与它的主要竞争对手差不多 Realme 8.

此外,由于系统限制,一些基准测试无法进行。Redmi Note 10S在AI Mark和Basemark OS II中的表现相当差,可能是因为能量管理过于激进。

Geekbench 5.4
Single-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
507 Points ∼70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
559 Points ∼77% +10%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
532 Points ∼73% +5%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
305 Points ∼42% -40%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
728 Points ∼100% +44%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (506 - 532, n=5)
515 Points ∼71% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=269, last 2 years)
684 Points ∼94% +35%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
1685 Points ∼63%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1690 Points ∼64% 0%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
1689 Points ∼64% 0%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1234 Points ∼46% -27%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
2657 Points ∼100% +58%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (1622 - 1689, n=5)
1665 Points ∼63% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=269, last 2 years)
2225 Points ∼84% +32%
Vulkan Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2258 Points ∼86%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
2400 Points ∼91% +6%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
2324 Points ∼88% +3%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2055 - 2400, n=4)
2209 Points ∼84% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 8702, n=212, last 2 years)
2632 Points ∼100% +17%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2248 Points ∼84%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
2314 Points ∼87% +3%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
374 Points ∼14% -83%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
2668 Points ∼100% +19%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (1943 - 2314, n=5)
2194 Points ∼82% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 9069, n=214, last 2 years)
2580 Points ∼97% +15%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
8236 Points ∼74%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
10373 Points ∼93% +26%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
7554 Points ∼68% -8%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
11153 Points ∼100% +35%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (8236 - 10373, n=3)
9114 Points ∼82% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 18567, n=173, last 2 years)
10212 Points ∼92% +24%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3202 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3501 Points ∼100% +9%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
2542 Points ∼73% -21%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1797 Points ∼51% -44%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2542 - 3511, n=4)
3127 Points ∼89% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=178, last 2 years)
3350 Points ∼96% +5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3558 Points ∼94%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3647 Points ∼96% +3%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
2398 Points ∼63% -33%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1681 Points ∼44% -53%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2398 - 3592, n=4)
3201 Points ∼84% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=178, last 2 years)
3804 Points ∼100% +7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2372 Points ∼74%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3070 Points ∼95% +29%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
3222 Points ∼100% +36%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2368 Points ∼73% 0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2372 - 3253, n=4)
3024 Points ∼94% +27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (677 - 5268, n=178, last 2 years)
2860 Points ∼89% +21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3120 Points ∼40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3669 Points ∼47% +18%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
3293 Points ∼42% +6%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1819 Points ∼23% -42%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
7752 Points ∼100% +148%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (3120 - 3336, n=4)
3230 Points ∼42% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 13341, n=230, last 2 years)
5079 Points ∼66% +63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3335 Points ∼28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3803 Points ∼32% +14%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
3285 Points ∼27% -1%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1737 Points ∼14% -48%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
12070 Points ∼100% +262%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (3148 - 3335, n=4)
3272 Points ∼27% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 31940, n=230, last 2 years)
7282 Points ∼60% +118%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2547 Points ∼74%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3267 Points ∼95% +28%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
3323 Points ∼97% +30%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2182 Points ∼63% -14%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
3442 Points ∼100% +35%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2547 - 3392, n=4)
3128 Points ∼91% +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (651 - 6394, n=228, last 2 years)
3270 Points ∼95% +28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2587 Points ∼94%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2507 Points ∼91% -3%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
2745 Points ∼100% +6%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1151 Points ∼42% -56%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2587 - 2754, n=4)
2702 Points ∼98% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=184, last 2 years)
2477 Points ∼90% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2633 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2369 Points ∼90% -10%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
2633 Points ∼100% 0%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
998 Points ∼38% -62%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2599 - 2643, n=4)
2627 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=184, last 2 years)
2549 Points ∼97% -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2436 Points ∼75%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3152 Points ∼98% +29%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
3228 Points ∼100% +33%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2474 Points ∼77% +2%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2436 - 3261, n=4)
3039 Points ∼94% +25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (688 - 5262, n=184, last 2 years)
2865 Points ∼89% +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2682 Points ∼39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2680 Points ∼39% 0%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
2754 Points ∼40% +3%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1152 Points ∼17% -57%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
6871 Points ∼100% +156%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2682 - 2849, n=4)
2767 Points ∼40% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 11909, n=244, last 2 years)
4085 Points ∼59% +52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2743 Points ∼33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2551 Points ∼31% -7%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
2712 Points ∼33% -1%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1015 Points ∼12% -63%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
8218 Points ∼100% +200%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2682 - 2743, n=4)
2715 Points ∼33% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 20955, n=244, last 2 years)
5216 Points ∼63% +90%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2488 Points ∼57%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3256 Points ∼75% +31%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
2914 Points ∼67% +17%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2177 Points ∼50% -12%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
4367 Points ∼100% +76%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2488 - 3405, n=4)
3005 Points ∼69% +21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (635 - 5793, n=244, last 2 years)
3263 Points ∼75% +31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2641 Points ∼49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2353 Points ∼44% -11%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
2826 Points ∼52% +7%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1113 Points ∼21% -58%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
5406 Points ∼100% +105%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2641 - 2852, n=4)
2778 Points ∼51% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (426 - 6977, n=167, last 2 years)
2342 Points ∼43% -11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2845 Points ∼41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2257 Points ∼32% -21%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
2878 Points ∼41% +1%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
968 Points ∼14% -66%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
6987 Points ∼100% +146%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2788 - 2878, n=4)
2847 Points ∼41% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 11259, n=167, last 2 years)
2546 Points ∼36% -11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2110 Points ∼70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2765 Points ∼92% +31%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
2656 Points ∼88% +26%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2349 Points ∼78% +11%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
3017 Points ∼100% +43%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2110 - 2813, n=4)
2586 Points ∼86% +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1567 - 3958, n=167, last 2 years)
2579 Points ∼85% +22%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
1493 Points ∼43%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
383 Points ∼11%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
3488 Points ∼100%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (1373 - 1493, n=2)
1433 Points ∼41%
Average of class Smartphone
  (216 - 10062, n=201, last 2 years)
3085 Points ∼88%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
1502 Points ∼43%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
Points ∼0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
3455 Points ∼100%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (1352 - 1502, n=2)
1427 Points ∼41%
Average of class Smartphone
  (205 - 11700, n=206, last 2 years)
3404 Points ∼99%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
108 Points ∼11%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
987 Points ∼100%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
 
387 Points ∼39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 3080, n=163, last 2 years)
991 Points ∼100%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
Points ∼0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
974 Points ∼99%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
 
381 Points ∼39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (101 - 2864, n=158, last 2 years)
980 Points ∼100%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
60 fps ∼50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
59 fps ∼50% -2%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
35 fps ∼29% -42%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
119 fps ∼100% +98%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (45 - 68, n=3)
57.7 fps ∼48% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.5 - 165, n=202, last 2 years)
70.5 fps ∼59% +18%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
85 fps ∼46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
86 fps ∼47% +1%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
35 fps ∼19% -59%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
184 fps ∼100% +116%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (78 - 85, n=3)
81.3 fps ∼44% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 439, n=202, last 2 years)
144.3 fps ∼78% +70%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
49 fps ∼48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
37 fps ∼36% -24%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
19 fps ∼18% -61%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
103 fps ∼100% +110%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (42 - 49, n=3)
44.3 fps ∼43% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 161, n=201, last 2 years)
57.2 fps ∼56% +17%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
52 fps ∼47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
42 fps ∼38% -19%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
19 fps ∼17% -63%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
110 fps ∼100% +112%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (43 - 52, n=3)
49 fps ∼45% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.4 - 251, n=202, last 2 years)
82.3 fps ∼75% +58%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
31 fps ∼42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
27 fps ∼36% -13%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
13 fps ∼18% -58%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
74 fps ∼100% +139%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (26 - 31, n=3)
28.7 fps ∼39% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 136, n=201, last 2 years)
44.7 fps ∼60% +44%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
32 fps ∼42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
31 fps ∼40% -3%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
13 fps ∼17% -59%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
77 fps ∼100% +141%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (29 - 33, n=3)
31.3 fps ∼41% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 173, n=202, last 2 years)
55.7 fps ∼72% +74%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
18 fps ∼41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼36% -11%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
7 fps ∼16% -61%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
44 fps ∼100% +144%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (15 - 18, n=3)
16.7 fps ∼38% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 83, n=201, last 2 years)
28.3 fps ∼64% +57%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
19 fps ∼41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼39% -5%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
7.1 fps ∼15% -63%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
46 fps ∼100% +142%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (18 - 19, n=3)
18.7 fps ∼41% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 102, n=201, last 2 years)
33.7 fps ∼73% +77%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
19 fps ∼42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼38% -11%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
19 fps ∼42% 0%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
8.3 fps ∼18% -56%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
45 fps ∼100% +137%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (16 - 19, n=5)
18.2 fps ∼40% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.7 - 104, n=264, last 2 years)
29.4 fps ∼65% +55%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
20 fps ∼43%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
21 fps ∼46% +5%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
8.2 fps ∼18% -59%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
46 fps ∼100% +130%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (19 - 21, n=5)
20.4 fps ∼44% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.9 - 136, n=265, last 2 years)
35.2 fps ∼77% +76%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
12 fps ∼41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps ∼38% -8%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
12 fps ∼41% 0%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
4.9 fps ∼17% -59%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
29 fps ∼100% +142%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (10 - 12, n=5)
11.4 fps ∼39% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3 - 69, n=265, last 2 years)
20.4 fps ∼70% +70%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
7.4 fps ∼44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
7 fps ∼41% -5%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
7.7 fps ∼45% +4%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2.8 fps ∼16% -62%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
17 fps ∼100% +130%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (6.8 - 7.8, n=5)
7.48 fps ∼44% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.7 - 52, n=265, last 2 years)
13.4 fps ∼79% +81%
Antutu v9 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
330876 Points ∼59%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
198053 Points ∼35% -40%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
563850 Points ∼100% +70%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
 
330876 Points ∼59% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (111952 - 1119358, n=126, last 2 years)
556641 Points ∼99% +68%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
282417 Points ∼58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
275931 Points ∼57% -2%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
185542 Points ∼38% -34%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
483527 Points ∼100% +71%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (282417 - 295778, n=2)
289098 Points ∼60% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94609 - 727247, n=118, last 2 years)
365936 Points ∼76% +30%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
6118 Points ∼11%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
15832 Points ∼29% +159%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
46152 Points ∼84% +654%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (6118 - 12983, n=3)
10500 Points ∼19% +72%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 286905, n=146, last 2 years)
55254 Points ∼100% +803%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
1566 Points ∼30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3542 Points ∼68% +126%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2247 Points ∼43% +43%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
5224 Points ∼100% +234%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (1566 - 3182, n=3)
2600 Points ∼50% +66%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1223 - 8753, n=177, last 2 years)
4353 Points ∼83% +178%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2083 Points ∼24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
6828 Points ∼80% +228%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
4921 Points ∼58% +136%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
8549 Points ∼100% +310%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2083 - 5564, n=3)
4193 Points ∼49% +101%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2083 - 19657, n=177, last 2 years)
7713 Points ∼90% +270%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
1012 Points ∼18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
4295 Points ∼75% +324%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2618 Points ∼46% +159%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
5716 Points ∼100% +465%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (1012 - 4108, n=3)
2959 Points ∼52% +192%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 9044, n=177, last 2 years)
4979 Points ∼87% +392%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3178 Points ∼30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3807 Points ∼36% +20%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1832 Points ∼17% -42%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
10549 Points ∼100% +232%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (3178 - 3807, n=3)
3529 Points ∼33% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 26660, n=177, last 2 years)
7772 Points ∼74% +145%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
898 Points ∼62%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1410 Points ∼98% +57%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1081 Points ∼75% +20%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
1445 Points ∼100% +61%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (898 - 1288, n=3)
1125 Points ∼78% +25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (718 - 2392, n=177, last 2 years)
1392 Points ∼96% +55%

Remdi Note 10S在我们的浏览器基准测试中排在最后。我们重新进行了几次浏览器基准测试,但总是得到相同的结果。我们不清楚为什么Remdi Note 10S在这些基准测试中表现得如此糟糕。

尽管如此,小米智能手机提供了一个良好的网络浏览体验。滚动很流畅,网站加载也相对较快。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 182.6, n=177, last 2 years)
64.8 Points ∼100% +283%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Chrome 90.0.4430.210)
62 Points ∼96% +266%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)
48.53 Points ∼75% +187%
Average Mediatek Helio G95 (16.9 - 40.4, n=4)
32.8 Points ∼51% +94%
Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77)
32.19 Points ∼50% +90%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)
16.92 Points ∼26%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 414, n=160, last 2 years)
117.4 Points ∼100% +340%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Chrome 90.0.4430.210)
110.2 Points ∼94% +313%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)
89.5 Points ∼76% +236%
Average Mediatek Helio G95 (26.7 - 72.4, n=3)
56.6 Points ∼48% +112%
Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77)
47.84 Points ∼41% +79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)
26.66 Points ∼23%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 244, n=164, last 2 years)
62.6 runs/min ∼100% +326%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Chrome 90.0.4430.210)
59 runs/min ∼94% +301%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chome 81)
44.1 runs/min ∼70% +200%
Average Mediatek Helio G95 (14.7 - 34.2, n=3)
27.6 runs/min ∼44% +88%
Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77)
26.5 runs/min ∼42% +80%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)
14.7 runs/min ∼23%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 265, n=185, last 2 years)
94.7 Points ∼100% +238%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Chrome 90.0.4430.210)
90 Points ∼95% +221%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)
69 Points ∼73% +146%
Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77)
59 Points ∼62% +111%
Average Mediatek Helio G95 (28 - 57, n=4)
46.8 Points ∼49% +67%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)
28 Points ∼30%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (3526 - 65969, n=192, last 2 years)
24367 Points ∼100% +407%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Chrome 90.0.4430.210)
23902 Points ∼98% +397%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)
17303 Points ∼71% +260%
Average Mediatek Helio G95 (4808 - 16289, n=3)
12304 Points ∼50% +156%
Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77)
8958 Points ∼37% +86%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)
4808 Points ∼20%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)
10797 ms * ∼100%
Average Mediatek Helio G95 (2673 - 10797, n=4)
5037 ms * ∼47% +53%
Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77)
4322 ms * ∼40% +60%
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 15230, n=190, last 2 years)
2971 ms * ∼28% +72%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)
2794 ms * ∼26% +74%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Chrome 90.0.4430.210)
2155 ms * ∼20% +80%

* ... smaller is better

Redmi Note 10S的读写速度与其他竞争对手非常相似。这里唯一的例外是小米Poco X3 Pro,它的内部内存明显更快。Redmi Note 10S有两个变体:一个是64GB的内部存储器,另一个是128GB的内部存储。

根据规格表,Redmi Note 10S具有UFS 2.2内存。然而,Helio G95不能完全利用这种快速内存。根据规格表,Redmi Note 10S具有UFS 2.2内存。但是, Helio G95不能完全利用这么快的内存。UFS 2.0是联发科SoC能处理的最快的内存类型。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 10SXiaomi Redmi Note 9Srealme 8Oppo A74Xiaomi Poco X3 ProAverage 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-4%
-1%
1%
85%
36%
55%
Sequential Read 256KB
498.8
496.6
0%
526
5%
515
3%
1330
167%
683 ?(303 - 999, n=27)
37%
947 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=262, last 2 years)
90%
Sequential Write 256KB
372
214.8
-42%
187.8
-50%
255.3
-31%
527
42%
458 ?(105.3 - 857, n=27)
23%
502 ?(11.9 - 1485, n=262, last 2 years)
35%
Random Read 4KB
110.5
137
24%
144
30%
139.4
26%
203.1
84%
165.1 ?(89.3 - 253, n=27)
49%
171.3 ?(13.5 - 345, n=262, last 2 years)
55%
Random Write 4KB
121
123.6
2%
133
10%
126.4
4%
176.9
46%
162.6 ?(113.8 - 213, n=27)
34%
167.8 ?(30.3 - 475, n=263, last 2 years)
39%

游戏--不稳定的帧率

Redmi Note 10S可以顺利地运行非要求较高的标题。在我们的游戏基准测试中,Redmi Note 10S设法达到相对较高的帧率。然而,帧时间的一致性非常差。我们使用Gamebench来记录帧率。

Redmi Note 10S无法在我们基准测试的任何图形设置中保持一致的帧率。然而,触摸屏和运动传感器的工作没有任何问题。

PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
氩氦刀
氩氦刀
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
; Armajet: Ø43.8 (20-58)
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø50.5 (31-59)
; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø30.6 (19-41)

排放 - 带有立体声扬声器的智能手机

温度

GFXBench ES 2.0
GFXBench ES 2.0
GFXBench Manhatten 3.1
GFXBench Manhatten 3.1

根据我们的测量,Redmi Note 10S的表面温度在负载下达到38.6℃(101.48°F)。这款小米智能手机变得相当温暖。然而,它总是舒适地拿在手里。

我们的GFXBench压力测试显示,Redmi Note 10S可以在持续负载下保持所有的性能。小米智能手机不应该因为过热而在负载下节流。

Max. Load
 38.6 °C37.3 °C32.8 °C 
 37.8 °C36.8 °C31.7 °C 
 36.7 °C35.3 °C31 °C 
Maximum: 38.6 °C
Average: 35.3 °C
32.9 °C35.9 °C37.5 °C
32.2 °C34.1 °C37.3 °C
30.8 °C33.7 °C34.6 °C
Maximum: 37.5 °C
Average: 34.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  26.9 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
热量分布 - 前面
热量分布 - 前面
热量分布 - 背面
热量分布 - 背面

发言人

Redmi Note 10S的扬声器提供了一个相对较高的音量。然而,高音部分明显过高。扬声器在再现声音方面表现良好。对于媒体消费,我们建议使用一套耳机或外部扬声器。

用户可以通过3.5毫米音频插孔或蓝牙5将耳机或外部扬声器连接到小米智能手机上。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203032.92526.725.63125.624.54026.121.65036.434.66329.222.6802528.210017.824.912518.328.816018.638.920017.442.225014.247.831515.955.940012.857.85001462.763013.368.780012.274.4100012.376.4125011.977.9160012.876.2200012.777.5250012.178315012.978.7400013.280500013.479630013.677.2800013.473.11000013.970.51250014711600014.266.7SPL25.288.9N0.775median 13.4median 71Delta1.212.233.640.33541.124.824.924.927.128.5272724.815.715.316.52415.722.214.431.89.137.29.641.27.551.110.654.912.358.718.763.517.664.115.768.711.568.810.872.69.972.61372.216.47015.466.81761.318.263.420.266.820.465.917.366.717.850.128.380.90.945.6median 15.7median 63.52.89.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Note 10Srealme 8
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

realme 8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命 - 良好的电池运行时间

能源消耗

小米Redmi Note 10S是一款非常节能的智能手机。事实上,当涉及到功耗时,它在我们的比较表中占据了首位。在Geekbench基准测试中,耗电量峰值为8W。

附带的充电器的额定输出为33W。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.12 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.69 / 1.46 / 1.5 Watt
Load midlight 3.67 / 5.58 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
5020 mAh
Oppo A74
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
5160 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio G95
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-61%
-2%
-53%
-41%
-24%
Idle Minimum *
0.69
1.5
-117%
0.62
10%
0.79
-14%
1.297 ?(0.69 - 2.5, n=3)
-88%
0.898 ?(0.12 - 2.5, n=200, last 2 years)
-30%
Idle Average *
1.46
2.1
-44%
1.59
-9%
2.21
-51%
1.987 ?(0.9 - 3.6, n=3)
-36%
1.655 ?(0.65 - 3.6, n=200, last 2 years)
-13%
Idle Maximum *
1.5
2.5
-67%
1.63
-9%
2.26
-51%
2.13 ?(1.2 - 3.7, n=3)
-42%
1.874 ?(0.69 - 3.7, n=200, last 2 years)
-25%
Load Average *
3.67
5.2
-42%
4.05
-10%
6.17
-68%
4.32 ?(3.67 - 5, n=3)
-18%
4.43 ?(2.1 - 7.74, n=200, last 2 years)
-21%
Load Maximum *
5.58
7.5
-34%
5.2
7%
10.09
-81%
6.79 ?(5.58 - 8.4, n=3)
-22%
7.29 ?(3.56 - 11.9, n=200, last 2 years)
-31%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench, GFXBench and when idle (150 cd/m²)

012345678Tooltip
; Idle 1min: Ø1.048 (0.954-1.2)
; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.16 (1.315-6.05)
; Geekbench 5.4: Ø3.74 (0.892-8.04)

电池寿命

在我们面向实际的Wi-Fi测试中,Redmi Note 10S的电池运行时间达到了18小时以上。而 Realme 8在同一测试中持续了差不多的时间。但 Redmi Note 9S在我们的上网测试中比Redmi Note 10S持续的时间长。总而言之,Redmi Note 10S为一款拥有5000毫安时电池的智能手机提供了良好的电池寿命。

小米智能手机支持快速充电。用附带的充电器给Redmi Note 10S充满电大约需要一个半小时。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
60h 12min
WiFi Websurfing
18h 07min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
19h 32min
Load (maximum brightness)
6h 08min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
5020 mAh
realme 8
5000 mAh
Oppo A74
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
5160 mAh
Battery Runtime
-11%
-4%
-15%
-24%
Reader / Idle
3612
2263
-37%
2386
-34%
2372
-34%
H.264
1172
1269
8%
1179
1%
973
-17%
WiFi v1.3
1087
1187
9%
1039
-4%
982
-10%
879
-19%
Load
368
279
-24%
314
-15%
276
-25%

Pros

+ 明亮的显示屏
+ 立体声扬声器
+ IP53认证
+ 可同时使用两张SIM卡和一张MicroSD卡

Cons

- 与前代产品相比,性能改善不大
- 过于激进的能量管理对GNSS产生了负面影响
- 不支持Widevine DRM L1
- 游戏时帧率不稳定
- 对SD卡不支持exFAT
- 只有12个月的保修期

评语 - 性能稳定,硬件良好

对小米Redmi Note 10S的评论。设备由以下单位提供。德国小米公司
对小米Redmi Note 10S的评论。设备由以下单位提供。德国小米公司

Redmi Note 10S是小米的另一款价格低廉的中档智能手机。它提供了一个体面的性能水平,可以处理大多数应用程序。在要求很高的应用程序中,小米智能手机可能会感到滞后。此外,在非常繁重的网站上加载网页内容可能需要一段时间。电池运行时间相当好,相机系统也很不错。

Redmi Note

10提供了一个非常好的硬件组合。

现在的问题是选择哪个。Redmi Note 10 ,Redmi Note 10S或Redmi Note 10 Pro 。这些智能手机的价格从200到300欧元(约240-360美元)不等。通过选择合适的产品,你可以为自己节省一些钱。虽然Redmi Note 10没有NFC芯片,但Note 10 Pro有,但它也配备了更好的相机系统。这就是为什么Redmi Note 10S看起来是一个很好的折衷方案。Redmi Note 10S的主要竞争对手是realme 8 ,它的性能水平非常相似。Redmi Note 9S 的用户不应该升级到Redmi Note 10S。

价格和可用性

小米Redmi Note 10目前在Walmart售价为270美元。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S - 06/17/2021 v7
Mike Wobker

Chassis
87%
Keyboard
66 / 75 → 88%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
48 / 70 → 68%
Weight
90%
Battery
92%
Display
89%
Games Performance
29 / 64 → 45%
Application Performance
50 / 86 → 58%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
73 / 90 → 81%
Camera
63%
Average
74%
81%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 小米Redmi Note 10S评论。廉价的Android 智能手机是防水和防尘的
Mike Wobker, 2021-08-14 (Update: 2021-08-14)