Notebookcheck

红米Note 9 Pro智能手机评测:低价多能

再次出击。 小米试图通过廉价且设备齐全的中端智能手机来扰乱竞争。 借助Redmi Note 9 Pro,小米又向既定价格点投入了更多竞争力。 6.67英寸智能手机的建议零售价为250欧元(约合282美元),配备64-MP四摄像头和大容量电池。 我们的评测将告诉你是否值得购买。
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Felicitas Krohn (translated by Zewei Shen),
Android Smartphone Touchscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Redmi Note Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G 8 x 2.3 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
6144 MB 
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, capacitive, IPS, 康宁大猩猩玻璃5, FHD+, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 64 GB 
, 45.1 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机插孔, Card Reader: 最大512 GB的microSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Linear Z-axis vibration motor, 加速计,陀螺仪,接近传感器,指南针, IR blaster, Wi-Fi direct, USB OTG, DRM Widevine Level 1, Camera2 API Level 3
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (Band 2, 3, 5, 8), UMTS (bands 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), LTE (bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41), head SAR 0.662 W/kg, body SAR 1.021 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.8 x 165.75 x 76.68
Battery
5020 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix 主相机:64 MPix 48.0MP,f / 1.79,相位检测自动对焦,LED闪光灯,@ 2160p / 30fps,720p / 960fps的视频(相机1); 8.0MP,f / 2.2,广角(相机2); 5.0MP,f / 2.4,广角(相机3); 2.0MP,f / 2.4,景深(相机4)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f / 2.48,视频@ 1080p / 30fps
Additional features
Speakers: 底部单声道扬声器, Keyboard: virtual, 充电器,USB线,SIM工具,硅胶手机壳, MIUI 11, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
209 g, Power Supply: 40 g
Price
250 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Competing Devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
83 %
08/2020
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
SD 720G, Adreno 618
209 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.67"2400x1080
80 %
01/2020
Samsung Galaxy A51
Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3
172 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.5"2400x1080
81 %
10/2019
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4
200 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.53"2340x1080
80 %
06/2020
realme 6 Pro
SD 720G, Adreno 618
195 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.6"2400x1080
79 %
01/2020
Oppo A91
Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3
172 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.4"2400x1080
81 %
04/2020
Huawei P40 Lite
Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6
183 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.4"2310x1080

Size Comparison

165.75 mm 76.68 mm 8.8 mm 209 g163.8 mm 75.8 mm 8.9 mm 195 g161.35 mm 76.4 mm 8.79 mm 200 g160.2 mm 73.3 mm 7.9 mm 172 g159.2 mm 76.3 mm 8.7 mm 183 g158.5 mm 73.6 mm 7.9 mm 172 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
619 (283min - 670max) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
353 (330min - 362max) MBit/s ∼57% -43%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
298 (185min - 350max) MBit/s ∼48% -52%
Huawei P40 Lite
Mali-G52 MP6, Kirin 810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
298 (61min - 334max) MBit/s ∼48% -52%
Oppo A91
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P70, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
294 (80min - 338max) MBit/s ∼47% -53%
realme 6 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
292 (145min - 352max) MBit/s ∼47% -53%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=584)
274 MBit/s ∼44% -56%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
551 (465min - 583max) MBit/s ∼100%
Huawei P40 Lite
Mali-G52 MP6, Kirin 810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
338 (286min - 403max) MBit/s ∼61% -39%
Oppo A91
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P70, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
332 (312min - 337max) MBit/s ∼60% -40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
319 (302min - 325max) MBit/s ∼58% -42%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
297 (189min - 335max) MBit/s ∼54% -46%
realme 6 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
290 (137min - 336max) MBit/s ∼53% -47%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=584)
261 MBit/s ∼47% -53%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø609 (283-670)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø551 (465-583)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro: Overview
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro: Overview
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro: Lake
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro: Lake
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro: Turn
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro: Turn
Garmin Edge 500: Overview
Garmin Edge 500: Overview
Garmin Edge 500: Lake
Garmin Edge 500: Lake
Garmin Edge 500: Turn
Garmin Edge 500: Turn

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Tageslicht-Szene 1Tageslicht-Szene 25-facher ZoomUltraweitwinkelLowlight-Umgebung
ColorChecker
28.6 ∆E
49.3 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
35 ∆E
42 ∆E
58 ∆E
48.7 ∆E
32 ∆E
34.2 ∆E
26.7 ∆E
57.7 ∆E
59.4 ∆E
29.6 ∆E
44.9 ∆E
30.1 ∆E
62.6 ∆E
36.8 ∆E
42 ∆E
64.9 ∆E
64.9 ∆E
49 ∆E
36 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro: 41.94 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 64.93 ∆E
ColorChecker
3.6 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
6 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
0.8 ∆E
4 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
8 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro: 5.91 ∆E min: 0.82 - max: 11.17 ∆E
575
cd/m²
610
cd/m²
578
cd/m²
563
cd/m²
610
cd/m²
567
cd/m²
559
cd/m²
578
cd/m²
567
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 610 cd/m² Average: 578.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.25 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 610 cd/m²
Contrast: 1649:1 (Black: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.31
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Samsung Galaxy A51
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.53
realme 6 Pro
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.6
Oppo A91
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4
Huawei P40 Lite
IPS, 2310x1080, 6.4
Screen
-34%
-65%
-86%
-112%
-43%
Brightness middle
610
589
-3%
669
10%
442
-28%
594
-3%
478
-22%
Brightness
579
589
2%
630
9%
419
-28%
613
6%
448
-23%
Brightness Distribution
92
94
2%
87
-5%
90
-2%
89
-3%
87
-5%
Black Level *
0.37
0.42
-14%
0.37
-0%
0.49
-32%
Contrast
1649
1593
-3%
1195
-28%
976
-41%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.8
2.22
-23%
4.8
-167%
6.1
-239%
6.1
-239%
3
-67%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3
8.24
-175%
9
-200%
9.7
-223%
10.6
-253%
5.6
-87%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.5
2.6
-4%
6.2
-148%
5.9
-136%
7
-180%
4.1
-64%
Gamma
2.31 95%
2.111 104%
2.24 98%
2.35 94%
2.28 96%
2.26 97%
CCT
6864 95%
6508 100%
7846 83%
7631 85%
7370 88%
7282 89%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2404 Hz ≤ 43 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2404 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 43 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2404 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17699 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.8 ms rise
↘ 14.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20.4 ms rise
↘ 24.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.8 ms).
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
982 Points ∼60%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1063 Points ∼65% +8%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1337 Points ∼82% +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (982 - 1063, n=3)
1017 Points ∼62% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 4043, n=66)
1633 Points ∼100% +66%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1163 Points ∼47%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1201 Points ∼48% +3%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1338 Points ∼54% +15%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
2493 Points ∼100% +114%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (1163 - 1201, n=3)
1179 Points ∼47% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (272 - 4739, n=61)
1759 Points ∼71% +51%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1771 Points ∼90%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1759 Points ∼90% -1%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1475 Points ∼75% -17%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1430 Points ∼73% -19%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
1949 Points ∼99% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (1690 - 1771, n=3)
1740 Points ∼89% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 3531, n=107)
1961 Points ∼100% +11%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
569 Points ∼94%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
567 Points ∼94% 0%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
320 Points ∼53% -44%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
282 Points ∼47% -50%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
604 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (559 - 569, n=3)
565 Points ∼94% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1342, n=107)
557 Points ∼92% -2%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
7829 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5649 Points ∼56% -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
9967 Points ∼99% +27%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
10106 Points ∼100% +29%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
8185 Points ∼81% +5%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
9164 Points ∼91% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (7673 - 10106, n=3)
8536 Points ∼84% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 15299, n=509)
5915 Points ∼59% -24%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
9091 Points ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
6416 Points ∼43% -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
14946 Points ∼100% +64%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
13777 Points ∼92% +52%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
12070 Points ∼81% +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (9027 - 13777, n=3)
10632 Points ∼71% +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19989, n=667)
6485 Points ∼43% -29%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2721 Points ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2161 Points ∼73% -21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2543 Points ∼85% -7%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2562 Points ∼86% -6%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2304 Points ∼77% -15%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
2977 Points ∼100% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (2562 - 2765, n=3)
2683 Points ∼90% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=164)
2657 Points ∼89% -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2250 Points ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1438 Points ∼48% -36%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
1978 Points ∼66% -12%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2255 Points ∼76% 0%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1103 Points ∼37% -51%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
2552 Points ∼86% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (2250 - 2257, n=3)
2254 Points ∼76% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 8783, n=164)
2975 Points ∼100% +32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2340 Points ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1554 Points ∼58% -34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2087 Points ∼78% -11%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2317 Points ∼87% -1%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1248 Points ∼47% -47%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
2636 Points ∼99% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (2317 - 2353, n=3)
2337 Points ∼87% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6754, n=164)
2672 Points ∼100% +14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3236 Points ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2311 Points ∼58% -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3326 Points ∼84% +3%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3067 Points ∼77% -5%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2621 Points ∼66% -19%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
3972 Points ∼100% +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (3067 - 3256, n=3)
3186 Points ∼80% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=513)
2203 Points ∼55% -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2539 Points ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1530 Points ∼56% -40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2322 Points ∼84% -9%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2558 Points ∼93% +1%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1102 Points ∼40% -57%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
2752 Points ∼100% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (2539 - 2558, n=3)
2549 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9567, n=513)
2113 Points ∼77% -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2667 Points ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1654 Points ∼56% -38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2412 Points ∼82% -10%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2656 Points ∼90% 0%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1265 Points ∼43% -53%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
2954 Points ∼100% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (2656 - 2680, n=3)
2668 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8269, n=514)
1973 Points ∼67% -26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3226 Points ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2336 Points ∼58% -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3362 Points ∼84% +4%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3125 Points ∼78% -3%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2606 Points ∼65% -19%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
4003 Points ∼100% +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (3125 - 3267, n=3)
3206 Points ∼80% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=544)
2114 Points ∼53% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3785 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1993 Points ∼52% -47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2323 Points ∼61% -39%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3835 Points ∼100% +1%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1747 Points ∼46% -54%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
3488 Points ∼91% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (3785 - 3835, n=3)
3808 Points ∼99% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=544)
2832 Points ∼74% -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3645 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2060 Points ∼56% -43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2412 Points ∼66% -34%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3651 Points ∼100% 0%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1885 Points ∼52% -48%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
3591 Points ∼98% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (3645 - 3669, n=3)
3655 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=544)
2378 Points ∼65% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3170 Points ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2217 Points ∼60% -30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3280 Points ∼89% +3%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3083 Points ∼84% -3%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2550 Points ∼69% -20%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
3676 Points ∼100% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (3083 - 3170, n=3)
3135 Points ∼85% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=594)
2086 Points ∼57% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2356 Points ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1473 Points ∼54% -37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2218 Points ∼81% -6%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2388 Points ∼87% +1%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1117 Points ∼41% -53%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
2740 Points ∼100% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (2356 - 2388, n=3)
2371 Points ∼87% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=594)
1780 Points ∼65% -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2499 Points ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1592 Points ∼55% -36%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2390 Points ∼82% -4%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2514 Points ∼87% +1%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1276 Points ∼44% -49%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
2904 Points ∼100% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (2499 - 2514, n=3)
2507 Points ∼86% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7400, n=595)
1697 Points ∼58% -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3263 Points ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2225 Points ∼61% -32%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3267 Points ∼90% 0%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3076 Points ∼85% -6%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2568 Points ∼71% -21%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
3638 Points ∼100% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (3070 - 3263, n=3)
3136 Points ∼86% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=636)
1950 Points ∼54% -40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3620 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2027 Points ∼55% -44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2219 Points ∼60% -39%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3683 Points ∼100% +2%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1767 Points ∼48% -51%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
3384 Points ∼92% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (3620 - 3683, n=3)
3650 Points ∼99% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12611, n=635)
2343 Points ∼64% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3534 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2068 Points ∼59% -41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2390 Points ∼68% -32%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3528 Points ∼100% 0%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1899 Points ∼54% -46%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
3437 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (3501 - 3534, n=3)
3521 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9549, n=638)
2013 Points ∼57% -43%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
20054 Points ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
20393 Points ∼74% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
22928 Points ∼83% +14%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
14849 Points ∼54% -26%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
24514 Points ∼89% +22%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
27654 Points ∼100% +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (14849 - 20054, n=3)
18307 Points ∼66% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 58293, n=782)
15420 Points ∼56% -23%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
51789 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
25086 Points ∼47% -52%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
39137 Points ∼73% -24%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
53600 Points ∼100% +3%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
23159 Points ∼43% -55%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
47563 Points ∼89% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (51789 - 53600, n=3)
52696 Points ∼98% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=780)
26563 Points ∼50% -49%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
38315 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23866 Points ∼58% -38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
33832 Points ∼83% -12%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
33926 Points ∼83% -11%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
23447 Points ∼57% -39%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
41003 Points ∼100% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (33926 - 38671, n=3)
36971 Points ∼90% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 112989, n=780)
20764 Points ∼51% -46%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
85 fps ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
46 fps ∼52% -46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
82 fps ∼92% -4%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
85 fps ∼96% 0%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
89 fps ∼100% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (85 - 86, n=3)
85.3 fps ∼96% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=785)
44.9 fps ∼50% -47%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
60 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
40 fps ∼67% -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
58 fps ∼97% -3%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
59 fps ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (59 - 60, n=3)
59.7 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 138, n=794)
31 fps ∼52% -48%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
24 fps ∼45% -41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
49 fps ∼92% +20%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
41 fps ∼77% 0%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
53 fps ∼100% +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (41 - 42, n=3)
41.3 fps ∼78% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=690)
26.5 fps ∼50% -35%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
39 fps ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23 fps ∼44% -41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
42 fps ∼81% +8%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
38 fps ∼73% -3%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
52 fps ∼100% +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (37 - 39, n=3)
38 fps ∼73% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=698)
22.3 fps ∼43% -43%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
15 fps ∼45% -50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
29 fps ∼88% -3%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
30 fps ∼91% 0%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
33 fps ∼100% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (30 - 31, n=3)
30.3 fps ∼92% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=553)
21.3 fps ∼65% -29%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
29 fps ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14 fps ∼41% -52%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
26 fps ∼76% -10%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
27 fps ∼79% -7%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
34 fps ∼100% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (27 - 29, n=3)
27.7 fps ∼81% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=555)
19.4 fps ∼57% -33%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5.5 fps ∼42% -50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
6.8 fps ∼52% -38%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
11 fps ∼85% 0%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
4.5 fps ∼35% -59%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
13 fps ∼100% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (11 - 11, n=3)
11 fps ∼85% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=306)
11.3 fps ∼87% +3%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
6.9 fps ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3.5 fps ∼32% -49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
11 fps ∼100% +59%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
7 fps ∼64% +1%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2.9 fps ∼26% -58%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
7.9 fps ∼72% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (6.9 - 7, n=3)
6.97 fps ∼63% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=304)
8.09 fps ∼74% +17%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9.1 fps ∼43% -46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
17 fps ∼81% 0%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
17 fps ∼81% 0%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
7.5 fps ∼36% -56%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
21 fps ∼100% +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (17 - 17, n=3)
17 fps ∼81% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=310)
16.9 fps ∼80% -1%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 fps ∼48% -44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
19 fps ∼90% +6%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
19 fps ∼90% +6%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
8.8 fps ∼42% -51%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
21 fps ∼100% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (18 - 19, n=2)
18.5 fps ∼88% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=309)
19.4 fps ∼92% +8%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 fps ∼53% -44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
16 fps ∼84% -11%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
18 fps ∼95% 0%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
19 fps ∼100% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (18 - 18, n=3)
18 fps ∼95% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=478)
14.4 fps ∼76% -20%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.6 fps ∼43% -49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
14 fps ∼70% -18%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
16 fps ∼80% -6%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
20 fps ∼100% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (16 - 17, n=3)
16.3 fps ∼82% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=482)
12.7 fps ∼64% -25%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
271934 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
181295 Points ∼57% -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
282085 Points ∼88% +4%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
275464 Points ∼86% +1%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
319383 Points ∼100% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (271934 - 275931, n=3)
274443 Points ∼86% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 607937, n=107)
319223 Points ∼100% +17%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1226 Points ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
1145 Points ∼89% -7%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1233 Points ∼96% +1%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
1267 Points ∼98% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (1226 - 1410, n=3)
1290 Points ∼100% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=724)
817 Points ∼63% -33%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3757 Points ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2168 Points ∼50% -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3419 Points ∼79% -9%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3768 Points ∼87% 0%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
4339 Points ∼100% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (3757 - 3807, n=3)
3777 Points ∼87% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=724)
2491 Points ∼57% -34%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
4452 Points ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1605 Points ∼34% -64%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3609 Points ∼76% -19%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
4573 Points ∼97% +3%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
4726 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (4295 - 4573, n=3)
4440 Points ∼94% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=724)
1850 Points ∼39% -58%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
6856 Points ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4738 Points ∼66% -31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
6155 Points ∼86% -10%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
6908 Points ∼96% +1%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
7178 Points ∼100% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (6828 - 6908, n=3)
6864 Points ∼96% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=724)
3443 Points ∼48% -50%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3444 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
634 Points ∼17% -82%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3054 Points ∼83% -11%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3481 Points ∼94% +1%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
3695 Points ∼100% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (3444 - 3542, n=3)
3489 Points ∼94% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6273, n=724)
1754 Points ∼47% -49%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)
55.352 Points ∼100% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (47.9 - 48.5, n=2)
48.2 Points ∼87% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
47.901 Points ∼87%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=184)
40.7 Points ∼74% -15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)
35.298 Points ∼64% -26%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
27.681 Points ∼50% -42%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)
91.154 Points ∼100% +5%
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)
89.577 Points ∼98% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (86.8 - 89.6, n=3)
88.6 Points ∼97% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
86.75 Points ∼95%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)
72.098 Points ∼79% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
51.257 Points ∼56% -41%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=615)
47.1 Points ∼52% -46%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)
53.2 runs/min ∼100% +18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
45.2 runs/min ∼85%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (44.1 - 45.2, n=2)
44.7 runs/min ∼84% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=167)
43 runs/min ∼81% -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)
41.6 runs/min ∼78% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
29.1 runs/min ∼55% -36%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)
97 Points ∼100% +37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
71 Points ∼73%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=251)
69.9 Points ∼72% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (67 - 71, n=3)
69 Points ∼71% -3%
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)
67 Points ∼69% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
57 Points ∼59% -20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)
55 Points ∼57% -23%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)
17925 Points ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
17265 Points ∼96%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (17157 - 17303, n=3)
17242 Points ∼96% 0%
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)
17157 Points ∼96% -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)
15606 Points ∼87% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
10194 Points ∼57% -41%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=782)
7838 Points ∼44% -55%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1914 - 59466, n=808)
9783 ms * ∼100% -243%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
4375.1 ms * ∼45% -54%
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)
3033.1 ms * ∼31% -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)
3001.5 ms * ∼31% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (2794 - 3033, n=3)
2892 ms * ∼30% -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
2850.1 ms * ∼29%
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)
2471.6 ms * ∼25% +13%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 ProSamsung Galaxy A51Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Prorealme 6 ProOppo A91Huawei P40 LiteAverage 64 GB UFS 2.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-1%
17%
19%
-6%
35%
-8%
-33%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
54.94 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
60.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
9%
57.33 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
63.43 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
15%
60.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
10%
70.6 (Nano Memory Card)
29%
55.3 (33.3 - 65.3, n=9)
1%
51 (1.7 - 87.1, n=527)
-7%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
76.65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
73 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
71.61 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-7%
86.38 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
13%
77.21 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
1%
82.63 (Nano Memory Card)
8%
73.2 (36.8 - 85.4, n=9)
-5%
69 (8.1 - 96.5, n=527)
-10%
Random Write 4KB
112.93
104.4
-8%
180.4
60%
154
36%
28.55
-75%
175.45
55%
71.8 (13.6 - 196, n=13)
-36%
35.4 (0.14 - 319, n=879)
-69%
Random Read 4KB
122.58
110.8
-10%
156.22
27%
158.66
29%
145.64
19%
157.32
28%
113 (60.6 - 157, n=13)
-8%
58.7 (1.59 - 324, n=879)
-52%
Sequential Write 256KB
171.09
184.9
8%
193.54
13%
203.28
19%
185.26
8%
181.69
6%
180 (135 - 222, n=13)
5%
127 (2.99 - 911, n=879)
-26%
Sequential Read 256KB
498.15
496.1
0%
534.5
7%
512.61
3%
505.44
1%
912.99
83%
489 (272 - 687, n=13)
-2%
339 (12.1 - 1802, n=879)
-32%
010203040Tooltip
; Asphalt 9: Legends; 2.2.2a: Ø29.8 (21-31)
; PUBG Mobile; 0.18.0: Ø29.7 (19-31)
Max. Load
 38.1 °C38.4 °C38.2 °C 
 38.2 °C37.5 °C37.7 °C 
 36.4 °C36.6 °C38.2 °C 
Maximum: 38.4 °C
Average: 37.7 °C
34.5 °C34.7 °C38.5 °C
33.9 °C35 °C37.5 °C
34.4 °C35.2 °C36.3 °C
Maximum: 38.5 °C
Average: 35.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  29.5 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.832.92519.625.53123.920.44024.323.15030.533.56318.724.48020.420.410018.620.912517.526.716019.544.520019.244.325016.450.231515.255.640014.259.750014.765.863013.872.180014.675.2100014.175.8125013.574.4160014.474.9200013.976.1250013.878.7315013.879.4400014.771.2500014.271.1630014.470.8800014.974100001575.61250015.166.41600015.356.1SPL26.587.1N0.869.6median 14.7median 71.1Delta0.811.934.933.929.124.125.424.329.426.239.43427.324.821.622.1242320.722.519.938.51840.916.847.516.253.315.957.613.559.213.962.312.964.91465.414.766.614.168.214.268.714.569.815.470.614.97014.867.51562.815.360.815.360.515.64415.535.12779.30.942.8median 15.3median 60.81.311.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Note 9 ProXiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.25 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.75 / 2.19 / 2.24 Watt
Load midlight 3.88 / 5.97 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
5020 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A51
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
4500 mAh
realme 6 Pro
4300 mAh
Oppo A91
4025 mAh
Huawei P40 Lite
4200 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-5%
-14%
-11%
15%
3%
-15%
0%
Idle Minimum *
0.75
0.9
-20%
0.79
-5%
0.92
-23%
0.82
-9%
0.79
-5%
1.057 (0.75 - 1.5, n=3)
-41%
0.89 (0.2 - 3.4, n=883)
-19%
Idle Average *
2.19
1.7
22%
2.32
-6%
1.79
18%
1.73
21%
2.14
2%
2.03 (1.79 - 2.19, n=3)
7%
1.755 (0.6 - 6.2, n=882)
20%
Idle Maximum *
2.24
1.8
20%
2.38
-6%
1.88
16%
1.75
22%
2.23
-0%
2.21 (1.88 - 2.5, n=3)
1%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=883)
9%
Load Average *
3.88
5.2
-34%
4.72
-22%
5.41
-39%
2.33
40%
3.6
7%
4.83 (3.88 - 5.41, n=3)
-24%
4.1 (0.8 - 10.8, n=877)
-6%
Load Maximum *
5.97
6.6
-11%
7.68
-29%
7.59
-27%
5.97
-0%
5.17
13%
7.02 (5.97 - 7.59, n=3)
-18%
6.07 (1.2 - 14.2, n=877)
-2%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
38h 56min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
19h 35min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
18h 16min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 03min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
5020 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A51
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
4500 mAh
realme 6 Pro
4300 mAh
Oppo A91
4025 mAh
Huawei P40 Lite
4200 mAh
Battery Runtime
-24%
-21%
-12%
-49%
-10%
Reader / Idle
2336
1689
-28%
1893
-19%
2154
-8%
H.264
1096
846
-23%
984
-10%
1176
7%
WiFi v1.3
1175
698
-41%
864
-26%
1031
-12%
605
-49%
1007
-14%
Load
303
289
-5%
212
-30%
228
-25%

Pros

+ 物有所值
+ NFC
+ microSD和2x双SIM卡
+ 快速Wi-Fi
+ SAR值低
+ 33瓦充电器
+ 快速的系统性能
+ 没有降频
+ 续航时间长

Cons

- 游戏限30FPS
- 低对比度显示
- 预装的垃圾软件

总结——再一次的低价高配:

红米Note 9 Pro智能手机评测. Test device courtesy of Xiaomi Germany
红米Note 9 Pro智能手机评测. Test device courtesy of Xiaomi Germany

借助Redmi Note 9 Pro,小米又发布了一款智能手机,该智能手机在其产品组合中具有很高的性价比。

售价250欧元(〜282美元),它提供了很多功能:明亮的6.67英寸IPS显示屏,6 GB的RAM,64或128 GB的内部存储,八核Snapdragon 720G SoC和带有四摄像头的影像系统。得益于5020 mAh电池,Redmi Note 9 Pro可以实现出色的运行时间,33瓦电源适配器可为手机快速充电,并且还有一些方便的附加功能,例如可同时容纳一个microSD和两个SIM卡的托架。

小米Redmi Note 9 Pro以其价格提供了很多价值,而其较长的续航和诸如NFC之类的附加功能使其在机海中脱颖而出。

另一方面,它的缺点很少而且不太重要。话虽这么说,但64-MP摄像并没有像其规格所显示的那样令人印象深刻,因为它缺乏动态范围。相比之下,30 FPS的游戏并不是一个大问题,尤其是因为它们很少会跌破此FPS。尽管智能手机包含预装的广告程序,但可以删除相应的应用程序。

这款智能手机的发布可能会让Redmi Note 9S的购买者感到遗憾。虽然Redmi Note 9 Pro在物理上几乎是相同的,但它提供了一些高端功能,包括NFC模块,但价格更贵。但是,从Redmi Note 8 Pro升级上来并不是特别值得,因为在两代之间只有很小的改进。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro - 06/23/2020 v7
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
86%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
96%
Connectivity
50 / 70 → 72%
Weight
88%
Battery
92%
Display
89%
Games Performance
29 / 64 → 46%
Application Performance
70 / 86 → 81%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
80 / 90 → 89%
Camera
65%
Average
77%
83%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 红米Note 9 Pro智能手机评测:低价多能
Manuel Masiero, 2020-08-23 (Update: 2020-08-23)