Notebookcheck Logo

realme 9i智能手机评测--带立体声扬声器的经济实惠的中档机型

90赫兹显示,刷新率可变。 由于现代的SoC和快速充电技术,realme 9i是一款有趣的、负担得起的中档手机。电池可以持续很长时间,还提供立体声。那么,这是不是一个真正的便宜货?
Android ARM Smartphone
realme 9i
Realme 9i (9 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73) / Silver (Cortex-A53)
Graphics adapter
Memory
4 GB 
Display
6.60 inch 20:9, 2412 x 1080 pixel 400 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, adaptive framerate, 180 Hz sampling rate, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 111 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio port, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, proximity, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41) , Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.4 x 164.4 x 75.7
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 33 Watt Dart Charge
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.8, phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/​30fps (Camera 1); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, macro lens (Camera 2); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, monochrome (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.1, 26mm, 1/3.0", 1.0µm, Videos @1080p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers, Keyboard: virtual keyboard, charger, USB cable, SIM tool, bumper, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.789 W/kg (head), 1,020 W/kg (body), fanless
Weight
190 g
Price
220 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
78.8 %
04/2022
Realme 9i
SD 680, Adreno 610
190 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.60"2412x1080
78.1 %
08/2021
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2
186 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.40"1600x720
80.5 %
01/2022
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2
195 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2400x1080
80.5 %
04/2021
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
SD 678, Adreno 612
178.8 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.43"2400x1080

外壳和功能 - 不寻常的背板

realme 9i是目前realme 9系列中最便宜的智能手机,它代表了中端级别。只需花200多欧元,你就能得到一部背面装饰有垂直条纹图案的塑料智能手机。根据观察的角度,背面以这样的方式反射光线,使观察者看到条纹--这是一种有趣的效果,我们在任何其他智能手机上都没有遇到。

颜色选择是浅蓝色或黑色。我们的测试设备在屏幕上施加压力时,显示屏上很快出现斑点,但它们马上就消失了。因此,稳定性一般,但制造质量处于高水平。

制造商提供两种存储选项。

  • realme 9i 64 GB大容量存储/4 GB内存:220欧元
  • realme 9i 128 GB大容量存储/4 GB内存:240欧元

用于移动支付服务的NFC也在机上,蓝牙5.0和3.5毫米音频端口也可用。还有一个专门的microSD插槽,所以它可以和两个SIM卡一起使用。用我们的参考microSD卡Angelbird AV Pro V60进行的测试表明,该microSD读卡器在复制测试和CPDT基准测试中都达到了不错的数据传输速度。

realme 9i
realme 9i
realme 9i
realme 9i
realme 9i
realme 9i

尺寸比较

164.4 mm 75.7 mm 8.4 mm 190 g163.56 mm 75.78 mm 8.75 mm 195 g160.46 mm 74.5 mm 8.29 mm 178.8 g159.3 mm 73.6 mm 8.4 mm 186 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
  (Angelbird V60)
44.2 MB/s +65%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10.9 - 77, n=98, last 2 years)
27.5 MB/s +3%
Realme 9i
  (Angelbird V60)
26.8 MB/s
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
  (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
15.47 MB/s -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
14.32 MB/s -47%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Realme 9i Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø39.9 (23.8-47.8)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø32.2 (24.3-39.7)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø32 (25-46.5)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Adreno 612, SD 678, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø38.7 (30.1-49.6)
Realme 9i Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø73.4 (43.7-82.9)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø54.7 (8-62.4)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø75.5 (58.6-78.9)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Adreno 612, SD 678, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø85.7 (34.1-91.6)

通信、软件和操作 - realme手机没有5G

在200欧元左右的价格范围内,WiFi 5是智能手机的等级标准。realme 9i满足了这一点,还提供了约300 Mbit/s的典型传输速率。然而,速度在实际平均速率附近波动很大,所以也会有下降的情况。

realme 9i不提供5G支持,可用的4G频率也不多,所以在旅行时,你可能会被切断移动互联网,这取决于国家的情况。在我们的样本测试中,接收强度明显低于高端智能手机,但在室内仍可使用。

Realme安装了Android 11和realmeUI 2.0作为操作系统。在测试时,安全补丁是2022年3月的,因此是最新的。Realme没有提供任何官方信息,说明这款智能手机的系统和安全更新将支持多长时间,但由于realme 7仍将获得Android 12,至少应该保证2次操作系统升级。

90赫兹的屏幕和现代的处理器使系统运行流畅。指纹传感器位于外壳右侧略微凹陷的待机按钮中,可以快速可靠地解锁设备。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
346 (267min - 353max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
287 (259min - 311max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
328 (255min - 340max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
246 (206min - 270max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Realme 9i
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
306 (89min - 380max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Realme 9i
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
268 (181min - 318max) MBit/s
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Realme 9i; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø268 (181-318)
Realme 9i; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø307 (89-380)

照相机--弱于弱光

前置摄像头照片样本
前置摄像头照片样本

realme 9i有一个5000万像素的主摄像头。然而,全分辨率只能在一个特殊模式下使用。通常情况下,通过像素分档,只用四分之一的分辨率记录照片,从而达到更高的光照强度。即使在放大的情况下,图像清晰度仍然很好,但像天空这样的大面积物体会出现条纹和颜色边缘。

这款相机显然在非常低的光线下很吃力,这也被我们照片实验室的照片所证明,在那里我们可以更好地调节照明条件。视频可以以1080p和30 fps的速度录制,自动对焦和亮度调节在这里工作得相当迅速和准确。数字变焦的平滑速度控制的可能性很好,所以可以创造出很酷的效果。

没有广角镜头,只有一个微距镜头,你可以在特殊模式下使用。第三个镜头包含了一个黑白传感器,用于支持主相机的模糊效果。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow Light
click to load images
ColorChecker
18.6 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
9 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Realme 9i: 13.74 ∆E min: 4.12 - max: 19.65 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.3 ∆E
54.6 ∆E
39.9 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
45.4 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
53.3 ∆E
36 ∆E
43.7 ∆E
28.3 ∆E
65.1 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
31.7 ∆E
47.1 ∆E
37.1 ∆E
76.7 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
42 ∆E
93 ∆E
71 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Realme 9i: 46.95 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 92.95 ∆E

显示器 - realme手机的明亮IPS屏幕

子像素结构
子像素结构

像A22 4G中的AMOLED显示屏 Galaxy A22 4GRedmi Note 10realme 9i中没有。相反,它有一个全高清IPS显示屏,平均最大亮度超过500cd/m²,令人信服。同样不错的是,亮度分布相当均匀。它是一个90赫兹的显示屏,可以动态地使帧率适应所观看的内容。然而,这种调整并不平滑,从30赫兹开始,有5个步骤。

0.6cd/m²的黑色值相当平庸,在明亮的颜色中明显可见的偏蓝也削弱了对画质的印象。蓝色调的色彩偏差相当高,但总体上仍在限制范围内。我们没有测量PWM

515
cd/m²
507
cd/m²
505
cd/m²
520
cd/m²
508
cd/m²
519
cd/m²
509
cd/m²
516
cd/m²
520
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 520 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 513.2 cd/m² Minimum: 3.38 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 508 cd/m²
Contrast: 847:1 (Black: 0.6 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.68 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 5.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
98.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.153
Realme 9i
IPS, 2412x1080, 6.60
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Super AMOLED, 1600x720, 6.40
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
TFT-LCD, 2400x1080, 6.60
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.43
Response Times
75%
-70%
84%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
34 ?(17, 17)
6 ?(3, 3)
82%
50 ?(25.6, 24.4)
-47%
4.8 ?(2.4, 2.4)
86%
Response Time Black / White *
18 ?(7, 11)
6 ?(3, 3)
67%
34.8 ?(20.8, 14)
-93%
3.2 ?(2, 1.2)
82%
PWM Frequency
127.6
250 ?(69)
Screen
-27%
2%
37%
Brightness middle
508
349
-31%
504
-1%
695
37%
Brightness
513
352
-31%
499
-3%
693
35%
Brightness Distribution
97
92
-5%
91
-6%
98
1%
Black Level *
0.6
0.72
-20%
Contrast
847
700
-17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.68
5.87
-60%
3.3
10%
2.2
40%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.36
15.51
-86%
6
28%
4.8
43%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.7
2.7
53%
4.1
28%
1.9
67%
Gamma
2.153 102%
2.07 106%
2.28 96%
2.25 98%
CCT
7733 84%
6970 93%
7041 92%
6286 103%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
24% / -1%
-34% / -12%
61% / 49%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN色彩空间
CalMAN色彩空间
CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN饱和度

性能、排放和电池寿命 - 一个真正的长跑运动员

高通骁龙680是一个相当新的SoC,为日常使用提供足够的性能。尽管采用了现代的6纳米制造工艺,但拥有8个内核的处理器通常只能与对比设备相提并论,而图形单元也提供了同类产品中的典型性能。

很好的是,realme安装了UFS 2.1存储,在我们的测试设备中实现了相当快的数据传输。在日常使用中,用户通常会有足够的动力在系统中顺利导航。只是在更复杂的应用程序中,智能手机显然不能提供像高端智能手机那样的动力。

令人高兴的是,即使在我们的基准测试中经过1小时的高负荷,realme手机的升温也被控制在限制范围内,最高为40.9℃。

作为奖励,realme 9i配备了立体声扬声器:听筒被用作第二个扬声器。声音系统可以变得相当响亮,但在清晰度方面并没有达到顶级水平。至少高音没有被过分强调,所以即使在高音量下,声音仍然比较悦耳。通过3.5毫米音频端口或蓝牙连接扬声器或耳机,效果会更好。这里支持许多编解码器,包括LDAC和aptX HD。

realme 9i配备了一个5000毫安的电池,可以用最大33瓦的功率充电。包括一个合适的充电器,当电池为空时,只需要一个多小时就能充满。在我们的WLAN测试中,该智能手机实现了约17:36小时的运行时间,这在同类比较中是一个很好的结果,在合理节俭使用的情况下,也足够在远离电源插座的几天内使用。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
374 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
364 Points -3%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
598 Points +60%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678, Adreno 612, 4096
531 Points +42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (323 - 384, n=14)
373 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=214, last 2 years)
900 Points +141%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1557 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1370 Points -12%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1809 Points +16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678, Adreno 612, 4096
1541 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (1287 - 1738, n=14)
1580 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=214, last 2 years)
2947 Points +89%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
8730 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
6570 Points -25%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
9402 Points +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678, Adreno 612, 4096
7645 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (4535 - 8730, n=14)
6497 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=209, last 2 years)
11643 Points +33%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2166 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1783 Points -18%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3965 Points +83%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678, Adreno 612, 4096
2344 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (975 - 2254, n=10)
2051 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (704 - 23024, n=115, last 2 years)
9038 Points +317%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2046 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1630 Points -20%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
4014 Points +96%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678, Adreno 612, 4096
2245 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (1425 - 2187, n=10)
1990 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 45492, n=114, last 2 years)
15757 Points +670%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2722 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2654 Points -2%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3801 Points +40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678, Adreno 612, 4096
2769 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (463 - 2866, n=10)
2480 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1075 - 8749, n=114, last 2 years)
4335 Points +59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1332 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1354 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2714 Points +104%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678, Adreno 612, 4096
1480 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (1231 - 1441, n=13)
1342 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 7890, n=104, last 2 years)
2680 Points +101%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1159 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1198 Points +3%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2546 Points +120%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678, Adreno 612, 4096
1286 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (1077 - 1273, n=13)
1170 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 9814, n=104, last 2 years)
2667 Points +130%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2789 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2492 Points -11%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3529 Points +27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678, Adreno 612, 4096
3130 Points +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (2301 - 2930, n=13)
2708 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 4679, n=104, last 2 years)
3126 Points +12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1353 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1379 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2770 Points +105%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678, Adreno 612, 4096
1499 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (267 - 1429, n=14)
1264 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=177, last 2 years)
6571 Points +386%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1185 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1211 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2570 Points +117%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678, Adreno 612, 4096
1303 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (240 - 1309, n=14)
1130 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=176, last 2 years)
9383 Points +692%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2683 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2675 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3804 Points +42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678, Adreno 612, 4096
3156 Points +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (441 - 2853, n=14)
2386 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (938 - 8480, n=176, last 2 years)
4169 Points +55%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
446 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
679 Points +52%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1235 Points +177%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678, Adreno 612, 4096
483 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (437 - 589, n=14)
461 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (395 - 9839, n=132, last 2 years)
2528 Points +467%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
417 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
686 Points +65%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1210 Points +190%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678, Adreno 612, 4096
482 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (417 - 574, n=14)
448 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (394 - 20068, n=197, last 2 years)
6135 Points +1371%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
108 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
174 Points +61%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
360 Points +233%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678, Adreno 612, 4096
143 Points +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (22 - 130, n=15)
115.6 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 5226, n=202, last 2 years)
1647 Points +1425%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
112 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
173 Points +54%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
348 Points +211%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678, Adreno 612, 4096
143 Points +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (112 - 130, n=13)
122.4 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (110 - 5248, n=197, last 2 years)
1656 Points +1379%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
8.6 fps
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
17 fps +98%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
15 fps +74%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678, Adreno 612, 4096
9.3 fps +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (4.6 - 17, n=14)
9.51 fps +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=221, last 2 years)
43.1 fps +401%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
9.7 fps
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9.2 fps -5%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
17 fps +75%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678, Adreno 612, 4096
10 fps +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (5.1 - 9.8, n=14)
9.08 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 229, n=221, last 2 years)
63.1 fps +551%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
5.1 fps
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9.5 fps +86%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
9.3 fps +82%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678, Adreno 612, 4096
5.6 fps +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (2.7 - 11, n=14)
5.65 fps +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.8 - 105, n=221, last 2 years)
32.1 fps +529%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
3.3 fps
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3.3 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
6.2 fps +88%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678, Adreno 612, 4096
3.7 fps +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (1.4 - 3.3, n=14)
3.07 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 94, n=221, last 2 years)
25.1 fps +661%
Realme 9iSamsung Galaxy A22 4GXiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 10Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-60%
-7%
-38%
-25%
58%
Sequential Read 256KB
976
297.7
-69%
964
-1%
497.4
-49%
760 ?(427 - 1011, n=113)
-22%
1471 ?(215 - 4512, n=213, last 2 years)
51%
Sequential Write 256KB
719
183
-75%
471
-34%
241.5
-66%
297 ?(13.6 - 719, n=113)
-59%
1084 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=213, last 2 years)
51%
Random Read 4KB
176.8
101.2
-43%
148.8
-16%
131.5
-26%
152.9 ?(92.6 - 239, n=113)
-14%
243 ?(22.2 - 543, n=213, last 2 years)
37%
Random Write 4KB
137.4
66.9
-51%
171.8
25%
122.1
-11%
131.6 ?(18.2 - 290, n=113)
-4%
267 ?(13 - 709, n=213, last 2 years)
94%

温度

Max. Load
 40.9 °C38.4 °C37.3 °C 
 40.3 °C37.9 °C37.3 °C 
 39.4 °C37.7 °C37.4 °C 
Maximum: 40.9 °C
Average: 38.5 °C
34.6 °C36.4 °C38.2 °C
35.4 °C37.1 °C40.1 °C
36.1 °C37.5 °C39.4 °C
Maximum: 40.1 °C
Average: 37.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  40 °C | Room Temperature 21.3 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.


热力图前线
热力图前线
热图背面
热图背面

演讲者

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.543.42535.538.83131.730.94030.835.55032.235.96325.1268019.423.710020.92612517.630.216015.837.72001340.425011.743.931510.65540010.561.750011.96863013.874.880015.478.2100012.780.812501679.8160012.478.6200011.676.1250013.175.7315013.174.1400013.775.7500014.270.1630014.767800015.369.31000015.967.21250016.5661600017.161.6SPL26.188N0.769.9median 13.8median 69.3Delta1.910.733.139.42838.724.129.625.322.63637.12427.820.629.114.524.910.334.413.647.311.744.511.448.812.456.210.157.811.763.911.568.710.169.110.371.710.975.412.47210.768.411.969.412.771.413.177.313.17913.679.514.373.113.669.914.168.814.665.624.586.30.565.3median 12.4median 68.81.67.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseRealme 9iXiaomi Redmi Note 10
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Realme 9i audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命

Realme 9i
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
5000 mAh
Average of class Smartphone
 
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
1056
1252
19%
966
-9%
889
-16%
912 ?(424 - 2844, n=224, last 2 years)
-14%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
17h 36min

Pros

+ 动态90赫兹显示
+ 无PWM
+ 快速记忆
+ 运行时间长
+ 快速加载

Cons

- 没有5G
- 没有广角摄像头
- 弱光下的摄像头很弱
- 显示屏偏蓝

评语 - 明亮的屏幕和大电池,价格低廉

评测中:Realme 9i。测试设备由:
评测中:Realme 9i。测试设备由:
数码港.com

价格低廉的中档手机realme 9i绝对可以与对手竞争,它配备了明亮的屏幕和快速充电技术。在我们的测试中,它也被证明比许多类似价格的设备更耐用,不会过度发热。

电源开发足以让系统顺利运行,但它没有超过同类标准。

缺乏对5G的支持可能会让买家感到失望,而显示屏的明显偏蓝也应该在购买前考虑。弱光下的照片看起来相当阴暗,但我们喜欢正常光线下的照片,相当不错。只是遗憾的是,realme没有安装一个广角摄像头以提高灵活性。

价格便宜,漂亮,速度快。realme 9i相当有说服力,但在低光照方面有一个弱点。

总体而言,realme 9i值得购买。特别是如果你能以一个好价格买到它。这款 小米Poco M4 Pro 5G然而,它可以夸耀5G和更多的性能。如果你想拥有一个AMOLED屏幕,你可以仔细看一下 Redmi Note 10.

价格和可用性

realme 9i可直接从制造商那里获得64或128GB的.但也有Cyberport和其他大型零售商,如amazon.denotebooksbilliger.de有智能手机提供。

Realme 9i - 04/02/2022 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
84%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
46 / 70 → 65%
Weight
89%
Battery
92%
Display
85%
Games Performance
14 / 64 → 22%
Application Performance
65 / 86 → 76%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
66 / 90 → 73%
Camera
56%
Average
73%
79%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > realme 9i智能手机评测--带立体声扬声器的经济实惠的中档机型
Florian Schmitt, 2022-04- 6 (Update: 2022-04- 6)