Razer Blade 16 (2024) 笔记本电脑评测:配备超高速三星 OLED 显示屏
与去年的前代产品相比,Razer Blade 有哪些新变化?简而言之:WiFi 7、英特尔第 14 代处理器和 OLED 显示屏。后者是雷蛇宣传的最大新功能。即便如此,前代机型已经非常出色的 Mini-LED 显示屏选项仍得以保留,这意味着你现在可以在 OLED 和 Mini-LED 显示屏之间做出选择。因此,在这次评测中,我们将特别仔细地查看这款笔记本电脑的显示屏。此外,我们还将检查英特尔第 14 代处理器与第 13 代处理器相比,在刀锋 16 中能提供怎样的性能。
我们的 2024 Razer Blade 16 将与其他配备RTX 4090 的 16 英寸游戏本竞争,首先是联想旗舰Legion 9i Gen 8 16IRX8,但也包括申克 XMG Neo 16 E23 和华硕 ROG Zephyrus M16 。当然,我们还将把它与配备 Gen-13-HX CPU 和 RTX 4090 的前代产品 进行比较。为了在比较领域中至少有一台采用全新 Gen-14 CPU 的笔记本电脑,我们还将把它与配备i7-14650HX 的LenovoLegion 5i 16 G9 进行比较。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
91.1 % | 02/2024 | Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 22 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
89.8 % | 03/2023 | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 21.99 mm | 16.00" | 3840x2400 | |
90.2 % | 10/2023 | Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 2.6 kg | 22.7 mm | 16.00" | 3200x2000 | |
87.7 % | 04/2023 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 29.9 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
89.1 % | 02/2024 | Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 25.2 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳和连接性 - 金属一体成型机身,带钛金属板
这款笔记本电脑的外壳几乎没有任何变化--硬件依然采用铝合金一体式机身,底座前部还镶嵌了一块钛金属板,以提高其坚固性。外壳和键盘仍然是真正的指纹磁铁。
但有一点变化是:你现在可以选择 "水星 "版的 Blade,它采用了轻型设计。
有关该设备的外壳、连接和输入设备的更多信息,请参阅我们对2023 型号的评测 。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 (Angelbird AV PRO 128 GB V60) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=101, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 (Angelbird AV PRO 128 GB V60) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=95, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 |
输入设备 - 触摸板是不是太大了?
这款笔记本电脑的薄膜开关键相当大,键与键之间有一点空隙。反过来,Razer 决定不安装数字键盘。
按键的抬升距离很短,达到平均水平,反馈效果也不错。遗憾的是,上/下箭头键的高度减半,但除此之外,布局感觉不错,空间宽敞。
每个按键的 RGB 背光(Razer Chroma)可通过 Synapse 应用程序进行广泛配置,这也是 Razer 的典型特色。
触摸板非常大!大到旁边的掌托都显得太小了。这有时会导致触控板输入失败,因为你的手只是放在触控板的一侧,却不小心碰到了触控板。在这方面,少一点会更多一些。
显示屏 - 采用 OLED 或 Mini-LED 的 Blade 16?
我们的测试机型安装了全新的三星 OLED 显示屏,这也是 Razer 所推崇的显示屏。不过,你也可以选择配备优质 Mini-LED 显示屏的笔记本电脑。客户面临着一个艰难的抉择,因为两种面板类型各有利弊。
Mini-LED 的亮度最高可达 1,000 尼特(HDR),而前代机型在 SDR 模式下仍能达到 700 尼特以上。我们的 OLED 屏幕 "只能 "达到平均 420 尼特,但它却拥有完美的黑色值和高对比度。它可以使显示屏上的个别区域完美变暗。
Mini-LED 显示屏有两种原生分辨率模式,即 FHD+ 和 UHD+。OLED 的分辨率 "限制 "在 1600p(QHD+),但它的响应速度极快,在 0.2(灰到灰)和 0.4 毫秒(黑到白)之间。无论您最终选择哪款显示屏,Razer 的产品都不会让您失望。
我们的 Blade 测试机型采用的三星 OLED 显示屏表面反光、清晰。Razer 宣传该机型获得了各种认证,包括 VESA ClearMR 11000(240 Hz 时屏幕上移动物体的最高显示清晰度)、Calman Verified(色彩校准)和 VESA DisplayHDR True Black 500。
除了获得众多认证外,这款分辨率为 2,560 x 1,600 像素的 16:10 OLED 还支持 G-Sync,并经过预校准。OLED 没有背光出血现象。
|
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 416 cd/m²
Contrast: 20900:1 (Black: 0.02 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.07 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.07
ΔE Greyscale 1.12 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
95.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.29
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung SDC41AB (ATNA60DL03-0), OLED, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 AUO B160ZAN01.U, mini-LED, 3840x2400, 16.00 | Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 CSOT T3 MNG007ZA2-2, Mini-LED, 3200x2000, 16.00 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 BOE0AF0 NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 NE160QDM-NZ3, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -1% | -4% | -21% | -16% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.1 | 99.9 1% | 97.2 -2% | 67.3 -32% | 72.4 -27% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 96.7 -3% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 95.6 | 90.9 -5% | 87 -9% | 68.9 -28% | 74.1 -22% |
Response Times | -6469% | -2616% | -3996% | -3592% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.24 ? | 10.2 ? -4150% | 13.3 ? -5442% | 14.5 ? -5942% | 12.5 ? -5108% |
Response Time Black / White * | 0.4 ? | 62.04 ? -15410% | 11.6 ? -2800% | 8.6 ? -2050% | 8.7 ? -2075% |
PWM Frequency | 960 | 2420 ? 152% | 4742 394% | ||
Screen | -42% | -49% | -201% | -176% | |
Brightness middle | 418 | 730 75% | 674.9 61% | 372 -11% | 526 26% |
Brightness | 420 | 729 74% | 682 62% | 349 -17% | 500 19% |
Brightness Distribution | 98 | 94 -4% | 96 -2% | 88 -10% | 87 -11% |
Black Level * | 0.02 | 0.0045 77% | 0.04 -100% | 0.32 -1500% | 0.33 -1550% |
Contrast | 20900 | 162222 676% | 16873 -19% | 1163 -94% | 1594 -92% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.07 | 5.65 -428% | 2.56 -139% | 2.06 -93% | 1.2 -12% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.04 | 10.11 -150% | 4.16 -3% | 3 26% | 2.1 48% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.07 | 1.85 -73% | 2.47 -131% | 1.5 -40% | 1 7% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.12 | 8.1 -623% | 3 -168% | 1.9 -70% | 1.3 -16% |
Gamma | 2.29 96% | 1.98 111% | 2.38 92% | 2.312 95% | 2.23 99% |
CCT | 6417 101% | 5874 111% | 6799 96% | 6747 96% | 6391 102% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -2171% /
-1319% | -890% /
-553% | -1406% /
-705% | -1261% /
-630% |
* ... smaller is better
正如所承诺的那样,该面板几乎涵盖了 DisplayP3 的全部内容,当然也包括 sRGB。此外,AdobeRGB 的覆盖率约为 96%。
根据 Razer 的说法,每款 16 英寸 Blade 型号都经过预校准,我们的测量也证实了这一点。它的灰度和色彩偏差非常小,只有 1 左右,这意味着 Blade 16 非常适合编辑照片和视频。
制造商还在 Synapse 软件中为此设置了几种色彩配置文件,即 DCI-P3、Adobe RGB、Rec.709 和 sRGB。此外,还可以选择单独调整色彩模式,以及本机色彩模式。我们选择 DCI-P3 进行测量。
总的来说,我们认为 OLED 面板比 Mini-LED 显示屏略胜一筹,这主要是因为它具有出色的色彩空间覆盖率、色彩准确性、深黑色、高对比度和快速响应时间。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
0.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.2 ms rise | |
↘ 0.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
0.24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.15 ms rise | |
↘ 0.09 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 960 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 960 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 960 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17908 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
笔记本电脑 0.2 毫秒和 0.4 毫秒的响应时间非常快,对于我们测试设备的自动记录模式来说太快了。下面是我们手动记录的上升和下降时间。
在室外,由于 Blade 16 表面反光,使用起来可能会有些困难。尽管如此,其强烈的对比度还是稍微弥补了这一点。在阴凉处,户外工作应该没问题。
性能 - 尽管有新一代 CPU,但仍停滞不前
凭借其强大的 RTX 4090和同样强大的 英特尔酷睿 i9-14900HX当然,Blade 16 主要面向游戏玩家。但凭借其出色的屏幕和优雅轻薄的设计,Razer 也一直刻意将创意专业人士作为目标客户。32 GB 内存、WiFi 7 和 2 TB SSD 是我们测试样品的全部配置。
测试条件
Razer Synapse 是 Blade 型号的指挥和控制中心。您可以通过它设置四种性能模式(静音、平衡、涡轮、自定义)之一以及灯光效果,并进行进一步调整。
有时软件需要进行自我更新,这需要花费很长的时间,我们甚至不得不在更新后重新启动设备,这有点令人烦恼。在漫长的自动更新过程中,无法访问选项。主屏幕也不是最好的。虽然软件会记住 Windows 会话期间打开的最后一个选项卡(如性能),但我们总是要重启后才能进入主屏幕。在这里,我们首先要选择我们的设备(即使它是我们唯一的 Razer 设备),然后点击正确的选项卡;"自定义 "被默认选中(设置功能键)--一个可能很少使用的选项卡。
在基准测试中,我们使用自定义模式最大限度地提高了 CPU 和 GPU 的性能。不过,我们将风扇设置为自动,否则风扇会一直开到最大音量。有时图形切换会出现一些问题,某些应用程序会出现故障。例如,3DMark 06 只能在 dGPU 模式下启动。
处理器
酷睿 i9-14900HX 酷睿 i9-14900HX是目前笔记本电脑 Raptor-Lake-Refresh 系列中的佼佼者。不过,与去年的 Raptor Lake 相比,其架构保持不变,只是涡轮时钟频率略有提高。现在,它的主频高达 5.8 GHz,除此之外,英特尔的旗舰 CPU 还拥有 24 个内核(8 个 P 核心、16 个 E 核心;32 个线程)。
在 Cinebench R15 循环测试中,CPU 提供了非常高且稳定的性能,在运行 1 到 3 次后,性能没有出现通常的下降。即便如此 Legion 9与去年的顶级型号 酷睿 i9-13980HX和英特尔 13 代的其他顶级 CPU 一样快,只是稍逊一筹。性能较弱的 i7-14650HX在当前的 Legion 5则稍显落后。与其 前代,当前 CPU 的性能提高了约 8%。尽管性能出色,但并没有太多理由支持花大价钱购买英特尔第 14 代处理器,因为第 13 代处理器的速度几乎与第 14 代处理器相同。请看我们的 对新的第 14 代 CPU 的分析了解更多信息。
在下表中,我们列出了 Cinebench R15 使用不同性能模式时的功耗,右侧的截图说明了这些值。如果我们断开电源,Synapse 会自动切换到无法更改的平衡模式。不过,TDP 值甚至低于插入电源时的相同模式--它们与静音模式下的值更为接近。
性能模式/值 | Cinebench R15 分数,首次运行 | 运行开始时的 TDP | 运行结束时的 TDP |
---|---|---|---|
用户定义(增压/高) | 4,456 | 139 | 135 |
涡轮 | 4,305 | 139 | 126 |
平衡型 | 2,678 | 58 | 54 |
静音型 | 1,888 | 38 | 35 |
电池 | 1,835 | 37 | 34 |
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 -2! | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 -2! | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average of class Gaming |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (20702 - 32996, n=23) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34613, n=232, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (2043 - 2235, n=23) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (527 - 2235, n=230, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (8427 - 12419, n=23) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=230, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (779 - 859, n=23) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 | |
Average of class Gaming (169 - 855, n=230, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (3263 - 4875, n=23) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=234, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (287 - 320, n=23) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 318, n=233, last 2 years) |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Average of class Gaming (87 - 1259, n=228, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (102 - 164, n=23) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (87555 - 127108, n=23) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=229, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (6206 - 7508, n=23) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=229, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 6.2 / Multi-Core | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (15849 - 18643, n=23) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (5340 - 18590, n=76, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 6.2 / Single-Core | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (2800 - 3095, n=23) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (1599 - 3095, n=76, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (8618 - 21606, n=23) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=234, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (1669 - 2210, n=23) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2210, n=234, last 2 years) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (22.7 - 34.4, n=23) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=232, last 2 years) |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=226, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (33.9 - 85.1, n=23) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 4.47, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (0.3609 - 0.4225, n=23) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (17244 - 29351, n=22) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (3069 - 60169, n=225, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (88537 - 148888, n=22) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (18567 - 252486, n=225, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (4267 - 7229, n=22) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (629 - 10389, n=225, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (118405 - 148773, n=22) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 | |
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 200651, n=225, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (12217 - 18256, n=22) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 32988, n=225, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (43302 - 72594, n=22) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average of class Gaming (10291 - 134044, n=225, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (86964 - 241777, n=22) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=225, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (1265 - 2149, n=22) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2409, n=225, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (9170 - 16128, n=22) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (1518 - 31796, n=225, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (33960 - 51118, n=22) | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=226, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 |
系统性能
在 CrossMark 中,Blade 16 领先于对比设备,而在 PCMark 10 中,这款游戏机比具有相同 CPU/GPU 组合的普通笔记本电脑落后约 3%。总的来说,所有对比设备都取得了相似的成绩。
主观而言,系统运行流畅,只有图形切换会在启动应用程序时造成几秒钟的停滞,但这也是许多使用 dGPU 的其他游戏机的情况。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (8230 - 9234, n=8) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (5235 - 9852, n=198, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (10871 - 11628, n=8) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (8300 - 12334, n=197, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (9951 - 11759, n=8) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 11833, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (13219 - 16462, n=8) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (6462 - 18475, n=197, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1877 - 2238, n=8) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2334, n=171, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1738 - 2113, n=8) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=171, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (2195 - 2543, n=8) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2514, n=171, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1478 - 2327, n=8) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=171, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (322 - 339, n=7) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (215 - 480, n=194, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (287 - 309, n=5) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (157.9 - 328, n=163, last 2 years) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Average of class Gaming (421 - 824, n=209, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (430 - 467, n=8) |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 8401 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (56992 - 83392, n=22) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 92565, n=225, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (54443 - 87507, n=22) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (24879 - 90647, n=225, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (51387 - 78199, n=22) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average of class Gaming (21619 - 103259, n=225, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 152.5, n=222, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (79.7 - 105, n=22) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
一旦打开浏览器,LatencyMon 软件就会检测到轻微的延迟。当在我们的网站上打开多个标签页时,这些延迟就会增加。我们的 4K/60 fps YouTube 视频播放流畅,但有一帧掉帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
Razer 在测试设备中安装了一块来自三星的 2-TB PCIe-4-NVMe 固态硬盘。这款速度相对较快的存储设备在我们的 最佳榜单的第 13 位。在刀锋战士中,固态硬盘首先以最佳速度运行,但在较长时间内无法保持稳定--由于热节流,它的传输速率在一段时间后下降了约 30%。随后,它仍然保持了较快的速度,不过,Razer确实应该采取措施,确保一开始就不会出现热节流现象。
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
......(英文 RTX 4090是目前笔记本电脑最强大的 GPU。在刀锋 16 中,它甚至可以使用最大 175 瓦(150 瓦 + 25 瓦动态提升,取决于模式)。它还配备了 16 GB 内存。
在合成 3DMark 基准测试中,RTX-4090 的竞争对手都取得了类似的成绩,只有 XMG Neo 16 E23快了约 7%。总而言之,Blade 16 中的 RTX 4090 所取得的成绩与我们数据库中所有配备 RTX 4090 的笔记本电脑的平均成绩相当。与 2023刀锋16只高出 5%。
在电池模式下重复运行另一次 "Fire-Strike",笔记本电脑的图形分数下降了 85%!
3DMark 11 Performance | 44454 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 65797 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 34756 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 18732 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏
在游戏方面,笔记本电脑也有类似的表现。与上一代产品相比,Blade 再次取得了约 7% 的领先优势。其他上一代竞争对手,如 XMG Neo 16或 Legion 9等其他上一代竞争对手在游戏方面甚至超过了 Blade。
总的来说,Blade 16 的性能足以支持所有 4K 游戏。不过,在运行《Dying Light 》时,它的帧率有时会降至 60 帧以下。
在玩《赛博朋克 2077》1.6 版时,新款刀锋 16 在 4K 超高清下的帧数约为 52 帧。在 4K 下,无论是否使用最佳 GPU,在最高 RT 画质下帧率都会下降到无法播放的数值。
即使使用 DLSS 或帧生成 (FG),也无法与显示器的刷新率相媲美--至少在其原始 1600p 分辨率下是如此。在《赛博朋克》中,我们测得的刷新率为 53.42fps(DLSS),约为 85fps(FG)。在《使命召唤:现代战争 III》中,系统的刷新率为 161fps(DLSS)和 183fps(FG);在《艾伦觉醒 II》中,我们测得的刷新率为 73.5fps(DLSS)和 112.6fps(FG)。
下表显示了 Witcher 3FHD Ultra 在各种性能模式下的 FPS、耗电量和体积值。
性能模式/值 | Witcher 3 fps(最大/平均) | 噪音辐射(分贝) | 功耗(瓦特 |
---|---|---|---|
用户定义(增强/高) | 211 / 193 | 46.81 | 243 |
涡轮 | 203 / 191 | 46.81 | 242 |
平衡 | 177 / 169 | 42.99 | 196 |
静音 | 141 / 132 | 32.16 | 141 |
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average of class Gaming |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (6.38 - 167.7, n=218, last 2 years) |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (9.13 - 194.9, n=228, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (14.6 - 421, n=226, last 2 years) |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (26.9 - 220, n=238, last 2 years) |
Witcher 3 FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
GTA V (2015) | 184 | 181.9 | 181.6 | 138.1 | 126.9 | 168 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 567 | 425 | 354 | 200 | 164 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 233 | 210 | 201 | 188.1 | 187.3 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 171.7 | 155.7 | 137.5 | 126.8 | ||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 204 | 182.3 | 146.2 | 145.5 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 173 | 140 | 134 | 127 | 125 | 103 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 487 | 372 | 368 | 359.8 | 279 | 157 |
Dying Light 2 (2022) | 223.1 | 196.6 | 155.6 | 117.3 | 59.8 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 146.7 | 138.51 | 123.6 | 103.58 | 86.59 | 46.1 |
F1 23 (2023) | 113.2 | 72.4 | 36.9 | |||
Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 95.35 | 83.39 | 39.61 | |||
Assassin's Creed Mirage (2023) | 130 | 117 | 74 | |||
Alan Wake 2 (2023) | 108.6 | 78.4 | 41.6 | |||
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023 (2023) | 179 | 138 | 91 | |||
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora (2023) | 98 | 67 | 34 |
排放与功率 - Razer Blade 提供大量定制选项
噪音排放
在将 CPU 和 GPU 性能最大化的自定义模式下,风扇有时会静止不动,但大多数情况下,风扇会在 27 分贝左右嗡嗡作响,即使在空闲时也是如此。
在平均负载情况下(3DMark 06),风扇分两步加速。在最初的 30 秒内,风扇转速缓慢上升,并在超过 43 分贝之前将平均噪音水平维持了约一分钟。例如,价格便宜得多的 戴尔 G16则安静得多,在整个测试过程中输出音量保持在 27 分贝。在这种情况下,该笔记本电脑的前代产品也保持了较低的噪音。
从结果来看,涡轮增压模式在性能或噪音排放方面都没有带来任何优势。 Witcher 3但 Blade 的散热效果更好。
尽管性能几乎相同,但即使在最大压力下,新款 Blade 的噪音也比前代产品小得多。不过,竞争对手在游戏时的噪音更大。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23 / 23 / 27.66 dB(A) |
Load |
| 43.76 / 50.37 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23 dB(A) |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024 | Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0) | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8 | Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14650HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 4% | -2% | -30% | -11% | |
off / environment * | 23 | 20.84 9% | 23.7 -3% | 25 -9% | 24 -4% |
Idle Minimum * | 23 | 23.65 -3% | 24 -4% | 31 -35% | 24 -4% |
Idle Average * | 23 | 23.65 -3% | 24 -4% | 33 -43% | 28.8 -25% |
Idle Maximum * | 27.66 | 23.65 14% | 30.4 -10% | 42 -52% | 32 -16% |
Load Average * | 43.76 | 43.35 1% | 30.4 31% | 58 -33% | 45.5 -4% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 46.81 | 46.7 -0% | 52.2 -12% | 57 -22% | 53.1 -13% |
Load Maximum * | 50.37 | 46.72 7% | 54.9 -9% | 59 -17% | 55.7 -11% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在最大压力下,我们测得的热点温度高达 47 °C。如果把设备放在腿上,温度就会过高,但与同类产品相比,温度还是比较低的。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.1 °C / -9.2 F).
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -10% | -12% | -2% | -2% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 45 | 52 -16% | 49.6 -10% | 50 -11% | 40.4 10% |
Maximum Bottom * | 45 | 47.6 -6% | 48.6 -8% | 51 -13% | 43.8 3% |
Idle Upper Side * | 29 | 33 -14% | 33.2 -14% | 28 3% | 30.3 -4% |
Idle Bottom * | 30 | 30.6 -2% | 34.2 -14% | 26 13% | 35.3 -18% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
与许多其他游戏笔记本电脑不同,Blade 16 有四个扬声器,两个高音扬声器和两个低音扬声器。这为听众提供了均衡的高音和中音,而且与许多竞争对手不同的是,低音也很明显。
不过,这也有其局限性,扬声器的音量仍然不会过大。只有一个 3.5 毫米插孔用于连接模拟设备。
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.16 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
耗电量
新款 "刀锋战士 "在功耗方面取得了巨大进步。尤其是在空闲状态下,它的耗电量降到了预期的水平;而上一代机型在这种情况下非常耗电。
即使在玩《巫师》时,尽管性能相同甚至略有提高,但功耗也略有下降。现在,只有 328 瓦的理论临时最大功耗要高一些。
Razer 为自己的电源装置感到自豪是理所当然的,这些装置通常比一般第三方制造商的同类解决方案更小,但却能提供相同的性能。附带的 330 瓦电源大小恰好可以吸收峰值负载,而且据 Razer 称,与同类解决方案相比,其体积节省了约 60%。事实上,Razer 电源的体积明显小于戴尔 G16 所配备的 330 瓦电源。 戴尔 G16(2024)等产品的 330 瓦电源要小得多。
Off / Standby | 0.02 / 0.02 Watt |
Idle | 16.9 / 17.8 / 19.6 Watt |
Load |
128 / 328 Watt |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, OLED, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, SSSTC CA6-8D1024, mini-LED, 3840x2400, 16.00 | Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0), Mini-LED, 3200x2000, 16.00 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -41% | -69% | -6% | 10% | -21% | 2% | |
Idle Minimum * | 16.9 | 27.5 -63% | 32.3 -91% | 8 53% | 15.4 9% | 16.8 ? 1% | 13.9 ? 18% |
Idle Average * | 17.8 | 34.4 -93% | 42.6 -139% | 18 -1% | 19.7 -11% | 23.2 ? -30% | 19.2 ? -8% |
Idle Maximum * | 19.6 | 35.4 -81% | 57.9 -195% | 28 -43% | 20.7 -6% | 34.3 ? -75% | 27 ? -38% |
Load Average * | 128 | 147.8 -15% | 121 5% | 133 -4% | 102.6 20% | 130 ? -2% | 111.4 ? 13% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 243 | 256 -5% | 254 -5% | 294 -21% | 191.3 21% | ||
Load Maximum * | 328 | 286.7 13% | 297.7 9% | 399 -22% | 246.6 25% | 326 ? 1% | 251 ? 23% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
笔记本电脑的电池容量保持不变,仍为 95.2 Ah。运行时间也是如此。我们测得的上网时间约为 5.5 小时,观看视频约为 6.5 小时。
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 95.2 Wh | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 95.2 Wh | Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 6% | -40% | -1% | 6% | 2% | |
H.264 | 456 | 503 10% | 349 -23% | 576 26% | 400 ? -12% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 329 | 345.5 5% | 159 -52% | 399 21% | 444 35% | 367 ? 12% |
Load | 79 | 81 3% | 58 -27% | 46 -42% | 84.3 ? 7% | |
Witcher 3 ultra | 95 | 84 | 80.6 ? | |||
Reader / Idle | 404 | 543 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 从 2023 型升级为 2023 型的理由不多
Razer Blade 16 再次成为一款非常成功的游戏笔记本电脑。它小巧纤薄,功能强大,拥有高品质的外观。凭借其快速而漂亮的 OLED 显示屏,其配置也丰富了一个漂亮的屏幕选择。
不过,同样配备了非常出色的 Mini-LED 显示屏的 2023 机型的用户其实并没有升级的理由--它的性能几乎没有通过 Raptor Lake Refresh 得到提升,也没有为该机型添加任何必备功能。
就像它的前辈一样,2024 版的 Razer Blade 16 是一款非常成功的高端游戏机。然而,与几乎等同的前代产品相比,几乎没有任何升级的理由。
价格和供应情况
新款 Blade 16 目前在亚马逊上的售价为4,699.99 美元。
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
-
02/19/2024 v7
Christian Hintze
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.