Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
MagyarEluktronics Mech-17 GP2笔记本电脑评测。微星GT77泰坦的性能，没有大小之分
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2取代了去年的Mech-17 GP，将英特尔12代和Nvidia Ampere选项分别换成英特尔13代和Nvidia Ada Lovelace。值得注意的是，尽管相对于其他17英寸游戏笔记本电脑来说，它的占地面积很小，但它提供了酷睿HX系列CPU和175WGeForce RTX 4090图形。
Mech-17 GP2是基于去年Uniwill设计的Schenker Neo 17 M22的更新版本。它本质上是Neo 17 E23，尽管是在Eluktronics的品牌下。今年的主板有几个重要的变化，我们将在下面的分析中详细说明。否则，它们的外观设计仍然是相同的，因此我们建议查看我们现有的关于Schenker Neo 17 M22 的评论，以了解更多关于Mech-17 GP2的物理特性。
我们审查的配置已经完全配置了Core i9-13900HX和RTX 4090，价格约为3400美元。更少的SKU可用于RTX 4070，但所有选项都有相同的CPU和240 Hz 2560 x 1600 IPS显示屏。
Mech-17 GP2的替代品包括其他高端17英寸游戏笔记本电脑，如Razer Blade 17,Alienware m17 R5,Asus Zephyrus S17, 或MSI Titan GT77 。
更多Eluktronics评论。
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Processor
Intel Core i9-13900HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.4 GHz, 160 W PL2 / Short Burst, 99 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, Core: 2140 MHz, Memory: 2375 MHz, 175 W TDP, GDDR6, 531.18, Advanced Optimus, MUX
Memory
32 GB
, Samsung DDR5-4800, 40-39-39-76, Dual-Channel
Display
17.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 178 PPI, BOE NE170QDM-NZ1, IPS, BOE0A99, glossy: no, 240 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)
Storage
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, 1024 GB
Weight
2.878 kg, Power Supply: 1.108 kg
Price
3300 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 89.9 % | 03/2023 | Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 2.9 kg | 27 mm | 17.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 87.6 % | 09/2022 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 27 mm | 17.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 82.1 % | 02/2023 | MSI Katana 17 B13VFK i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 25.2 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 89 % | 02/2023 | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 3.5 kg | 23 mm | 17.30" | 3840x2160 | |
| 86.1 % | 01/2023 | Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT | 3.4 kg | 26.7 mm | 17.00" | 3840x2160 | |
| 91.4 % | 02/2023 | Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 3 kg | 21.9 mm | 18.00" | 2560x1600 |
案例
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 (Angelibird AV Pro V60) | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI (Angelibird AV Pro V60) | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 (Angelibird AV Pro V60) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 (Angelibird AV Pro V60) | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 (Angelibird AV Pro V60) | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI (Angelibird AV Pro V60) | |
沟通
英特尔AX201是Wi-Fi 6和蓝牙5.2连接的标准配置。尽管如此，考虑到该系统的价格，我们期望AX210/211能有更快的Wi-Fi 6E速度。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1295 (1034-1383)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 MediaTek RZ608; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø936 (898-971)
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1225 (1116-1351)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 MediaTek RZ608; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø966 (949-978)
网络摄像头
2MP FHD网络摄像头和IR是支持Hello的标准配置。不过，没有隐私开关或快门选项。
17.3 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
32.1 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
维护
底部面板由14颗飞利浦螺钉固定，相对来说比较容易维修。与去年的型号相比，制造商对内部结构进行了修改，如下图所示，尽管它们的外部设计仍然相同。两个内存模块现在是堆叠在一起的，以节省主板上的空间，而CPU和GPU的位置已经互换。
配件和保修
除了交流电适配器和文件之外，零售盒中没有任何额外的东西。该模型与可选的第二代液体推进包（LPP G2）外部冷却器兼容。
标准的一年有限制造商保修适用。额外支付250美元可升级到三年。
显示
我们早期的2023年模型采用了与2022年模型相同的BOE NE170QDM-NZ1面板和BOE0A99控制器，这意味着视觉体验同比没有什么不同。因此，我们下面的测量结果在2022年和2023年的型号之间几乎是相同的。但这并不是一种抱怨，因为该面板几乎提供了我们对高端游戏笔记本电脑所期望的一切，包括快速刷新率、快速响应时间、全sRGB覆盖和G-Sync支持。然而，对于更高的分辨率和更深的P3颜色，你将不得不去寻找其他地方，而不是像微星GT77或Razer Blade 18.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
BOE NE170QDM-NZ1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 417.3 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 386.9 cd/m² Minimum: 21.19 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 417.3 cd/m²
Contrast: 994:1 (Black: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.14 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.42
ΔE Greyscale 3.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
69.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 BOE NE170QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 17.00 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 BOE0A99, IPS, 2560x1600, 17.00 | MSI Katana 17 B13VFK B173HAN04.9, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 17.30 | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI B173ZAN06.C, Mini-LED, 3840x2160, 17.30 | Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AU Optronics AUODBA3, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.00 | Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 AU Optronics B180QAN01.0, IPS, 2560x1600, 18.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 0% | -40% | 23% | 23% | 21% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 69.1 | 69 0% | 40.8 -41% | 94.9 37% | 97.2 41% | 96.9 40% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.7 | 99.8 0% | 61 -39% | 99.9 0% | 99.6 0% | 99.8 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 69.8 | 69.6 0% | 42.2 -40% | 92.4 32% | 88.4 27% | 85.3 22% |
| Response Times | 23% | -176% | -202% | -30% | 40% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 12 ? | 10.8 ? 10% | 33 ? -175% | 38.4 ? -220% | 16.4 ? -37% | 4.2 ? 65% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 9.4 ? | 6.1 ? 35% | 26 ? -177% | 26.6 ? -183% | 11.6 ? -23% | 8 ? 15% |
| PWM Frequency | 2380 ? | |||||
| Screen | 1% | -158% | 67678% | -147% | -64% | |
| Brightness middle | 417.3 | 415 -1% | 267 -36% | 606 45% | 484 16% | 549.6 32% |
| Brightness | 387 | 399 3% | 256 -34% | 602 56% | 449 16% | 524 35% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 90 3% | 93 7% | 93 7% | 87 0% | 89 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.42 | 0.43 -2% | 0.21 50% | 0.0001 100% | 0.55 -31% | 0.53 -26% |
| Contrast | 994 | 965 -3% | 1271 28% | 6060000 609558% | 880 -11% | 1037 4% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.14 | 1.44 33% | 4.7 -120% | 4.8 -124% | 4.8 -124% | 3.32 -55% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.09 | 2.33 43% | 20.4 -399% | 8.2 -100% | 7.48 -83% | 6.63 -62% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.42 | 0.89 -112% | 4.5 -971% | 1.8 -329% | 4.74 -1029% | 2.7 -543% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.1 | 1.8 42% | 1.5 52% | 6.5 -110% | 5.5 -77% | 2 35% |
| Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.132 103% | 2.12 104% | 2.63 84% | 2.42 91% | 2.29 96% |
| CCT | 6040 108% | 6327 103% | 6552 99% | 6596 99% | 6148 106% | 6319 103% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 8% /
4% | -125% /
-135% | 22500% /
43484% | -51% /
-94% | -1% /
-31% |
* ... smaller is better
这款显示器开箱后就被很好地校准了，灰度和色彩的平均deltaE值分别只有3.1和2.14。我们自己校准它将进一步提高deltaE的平均值，在sRGB标准下只有0.6和0.42。我们上述经过校准的ICM配置文件可供免费下载。
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 9.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 6.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
业绩
测试条件
在运行以下任何基准测试之前，我们通过Windows将我们的设备设置为性能模式，并通过预装的Eluktronics控制中心软件设置为 "野兽模式"。我们还通过Nvidia控制面板将系统设置为dGPU模式。用户应该熟悉控制中心，因为它是切换特定型号功能的枢纽，如RGB、电池充电模式、性能模式、液体冷却模式等。支持高级优化（MUX）。
我们在测试设备上遇到了一些问题，包括空白的启动屏幕，游戏时至少有一次系统冻结，以及CPU和GPU长时间处于最大利用率时的自动重启。我们通过在BIOS菜单中禁用快速启动来解决第一个问题，但这种问题首先就不应该出现。
处理器
原始的CPU性能仅比第13代产品落后1%至2%。 酷睿i9-13950HX在微星Titan GT77中，因此它们在大多数情况下可能是相等的。从Ryzen 9 6900HX到我们的 酷睿i9-13900HX将多线程性能提高了2倍至2.5倍。第12代 酷睿i7-12700H在许多中高档游戏笔记本电脑上仍然很常见，它的速度大约慢50%。
性能的可持续性非常好，随着时间的推移没有重大的性能下降或循环行为。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø4802 (4757.37-4969.56)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø2230 (2203.37-2292.39)
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H: Ø2295 (2246.31-2349.07)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX: Ø4980 (4889.98-5226.71)
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX: Ø3311 (3259.45-3569.52)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX | |
| Corsair One i300 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (24270 - 32623, n=22) | |
| Corsair One i300 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1867 - 2105, n=19) | |
| Corsair One i300 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
| MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (9152 - 12541, n=20) | |
| Corsair One i300 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (722 - 810, n=20) | |
| Corsair One i300 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
| MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (3913 - 4970, n=21) | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| Corsair One i300 | |
| MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Corsair One i300 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (247 - 304, n=21) | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
| MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| Corsair One i300 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (101 - 153, n=21) | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (90675 - 127283, n=20) | |
| Corsair One i300 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (6340 - 7177, n=20) | |
| Corsair One i300 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (17614 - 21075, n=21) | |
| Corsair One i300 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1345 - 2093, n=21) | |
| Corsair One i300 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
| MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (23.5 - 34.4, n=21) | |
| Corsair One i300 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (32.8 - 51.1, n=20) | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| Corsair One i300 | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
| MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (0.375 - 0.4564, n=21) | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Corsair One i300 | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (17589 - 27615, n=21) | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (88686 - 137015, n=21) | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (4362 - 7029, n=21) | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (125644 - 141385, n=21) | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (12334 - 17179, n=21) | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (43850 - 69202, n=21) | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (89413 - 237881, n=21) | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1284 - 1958, n=21) | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (9481 - 15279, n=21) | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (42994 - 51994, n=21) | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
系统性能
PCMark分数是我们数据库中最高的一些，可与微星Titan GT77相媲美。特别是它的数字内容创作得分比去年的RTX 3080 Ti模型高出近70%，这是由于图形性能的增加。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (7690 - 9331, n=8) | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (10972 - 11983, n=8) | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (9038 - 11680, n=8) | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (10605 - 16395, n=8) | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1825 - 2295, n=8) | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1666 - 2166, n=8) | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (2162 - 2514, n=8) | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1441 - 2275, n=8) | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 9016 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (67716 - 78835, n=21) | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (73998 - 88462, n=21) | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (65472 - 77045, n=21) | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (80.4 - 91.1, n=21) | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示，在打开我们主页的多个浏览器标签时，存在轻微的DPC问题。在60 FPS的情况下，4K视频播放是完美的，没有掉帧。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的设备配备了一个1TB 三星PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR这是目前最快的基于消费者的PCIe4 x4 NVMe SSD之一。不幸的是，正如我们下面的压力测试图所示，我们单位的驱动器表现出在长时间内保持最大传输率的问题。相比之下，使用相同的三星驱动器的Razer Blade 15能够维持6700MB/s的传输率，没有任何问题。
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
7030 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
5040 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
669.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
494.9 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
2635 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
3276 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
61.83 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
130.1 MB/s
| Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø4351 (3559.71-6512.68)
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø6602 (5678.43-6643.28)
GPU性能
总体性能要比移动RTX 3080 Ti快40%至60%。 移动RTX 3080 Ti来说，大致上与 桌面RTX 3080 Ti.在支持的游戏上启用DLSS 3可以将性能提高2到3倍，尽管有潜在的图形伪影。
如果不支持或禁用RT效果，大多数游戏可以以原生4K和60FPS运行。例外情况包括像《赛博朋克2077》或《F1 22》这样要求非常高的游戏，帧率会在40至50FPS范围内徘徊。在这种情况下，G-Sync和DLSS可以派上用场，分别减少撕裂和提高性能。
选择RTX 4080或RTX 4070配置而不是RTX 4090，将使图形性能分别降低10%至15%和40%至45%。因此，4090和4080之间的性能差异要比4080和4070之间的性能差异小得多，尽管每一步之间的价格差异是固定的500美元。
| 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
| SCHENKER XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | |
| Corsair One i300 -1! | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS -1! | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 -1! | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK -2! | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH -2! | |
| MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) -1! | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 46863 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 37682 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 20223 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating | The Witcher 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11 | Cyberpunk 2077 1.6
| Performance Rating - Percent | |
| SCHENKER XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090 | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| Corsair One i300 -1! | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 -1! | |
| MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
| MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH -1! | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) -1! | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx -1! | |
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| SCHENKER XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090 | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| Corsair One i300 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
| MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| SCHENKER XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090 | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| Corsair One i300 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| SCHENKER XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090 | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| Corsair One i300 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
| MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| SCHENKER XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090 | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| Corsair One i300 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
| MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| SCHENKER XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090 | |
| Corsair One i300 | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
| MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| SCHENKER XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090 | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Corsair One i300 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
| MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| SCHENKER XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090 | |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 | The Witcher 3 | GTA V | Dota 2 Reborn | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | X-Plane 11.11 | Metro Exodus | Borderlands 3 | F1 22
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø207 (191-221)
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
| GTA V (2015) | 187.5 | 187.2 | 186.5 | 149.8 | 146.3 | 180.2 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 717.7 | 617.3 | 449 | 216.3 | 167.6 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 243 | 216 | 205 | 192.5 | 186.7 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 233 | 230 | 194.9 | 157.1 | 90.8 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 212 | 188.8 | 146.4 | 124.7 | ||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 656 | 508 | 465 | 421 | 315 | 163.4 |
| Metro Exodus (2019) | 240.1 | 207.1 | 173.8 | 146.5 | 127.7 | 82.1 |
| Borderlands 3 (2019) | 284.2 | 269.7 | 238.5 | 179.7 | 129.4 | 72.2 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 191.1 | 178.6 | 166.9 | 159.7 | 101.3 | 47.8 |
| F1 22 (2022) | 375 | 358 | 322 | 140.6 | 91.8 | 45.3 |
排放
系统噪音
虽然与去年的机型相比，冷却方案有所调整，但整体的风扇噪音仍然大致相同。无论设置或屏幕上的负载如何，内部风扇始终处于活动状态。如果不运行任何密集型应用程序，我们建议使用办公模式或平衡模式，因为风扇明显变得更安静，更有活力。
当在性能模式或 "野兽 "模式下进行游戏时，风扇噪音将稳定在50至52 dB(A)之间，这与Alienware m17 R5或Razer Blade 18相似。 Razer Blade 18在类似的条件下。在游戏时，如果风扇噪音超过50 dB(A)，耳机几乎是必须的。
Thermal Grizzly液态金属是所有配置的标准配置。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 28 / 28 / 30.4 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 41 / 52.6 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.2 dB(A) | ||
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW | MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024 | Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -8% | -6% | -7% | 10% | 9% | |
| off / environment * | 25.2 | 26 -3% | 24.5 3% | 24.6 2% | 23 9% | 23.5 7% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28 | 26 7% | 24.5 12% | 29.2 -4% | 23 18% | 23.8 15% |
| Idle Average * | 28 | 29 -4% | 24.5 12% | 29.2 -4% | 28.11 -0% | 23.8 15% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30.4 | 40 -32% | 40 -32% | 29.2 4% | 28.11 8% | 26.8 12% |
| Load Average * | 41 | 47 -15% | 48.3 -18% | 50.7 -24% | 30.62 25% | 37.3 9% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 50.7 | 52 -3% | 56 -10% | 53.3 -5% | 49.75 2% | 48 5% |
| Load Maximum * | 52.6 | 54 -3% | 59.1 -12% | 61 -16% | 50.17 5% | 53.5 -2% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
表面温度在中心位置最热，沿键盘两侧和掌托处最凉。新鲜空气通过WASD键进入，使手指在游戏时保持凉爽。39摄氏度到44摄氏度的热点比我们在Alienware m17 R5上记录的温度要低。 摄氏39度至44度，比我们在Alienware m17 R5上记录的温度要低。在类似的游戏条件下，热点可以达到50 C至57 C。
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.5 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25 °C / 77 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+3.9 °C / 7 F).
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.5 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25 °C / 77 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+3.9 °C / 7 F).
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT | Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -13% | -7% | 4% | -14% | 1% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 39 | 49 -26% | 41.6 -7% | 40.6 -4% | 53 -36% | 39.2 -1% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 44 | 52 -18% | 43.1 2% | 41.1 7% | 56 -27% | 35.6 19% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 31 | 30 3% | 32 -3% | 26.2 15% | 30 3% | 31.8 -3% |
| Idle Bottom * | 29.8 | 33 -11% | 35.8 -20% | 30.3 -2% | 29 3% | 33.2 -11% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
当在Prime95下施加压力时，CPU将提升到4.7 GHz、160 W和96 C，只持续一两秒钟，然后立即下降到4.1 GHz和107 W，然而，核心温度将保持在96 C，非常高。
在运行时，GPU时钟频率、温度和功耗将分别稳定在2310 MHz、80 C和169 W。 Witcher 3.GPU的额定功率为175 W TGP，因此现实世界的耗电量为169 W，非常接近。不幸的是，CPU的温度将保持在96摄氏度，而Razer Blade 18的温度为85摄氏度或66摄氏度。 Razer Blade 18(RTX 4070)或 微星GT77，分别为85 C或66 C。
同时运行Prime95和FurMark超过数分钟，每次都会使我们的设备崩溃。我们怀疑核心温度高是自动关机和重启的原因。大多数其他笔记本电脑在这样的极端负载下会节制性能，以防止崩溃。
用电池供电运行严重地限制了性能。在电池上进行的Fire Strike 测试将返回物理和图形分数，分别为11430和11496分，而在主电源上则为43004和47611分。
| CPU时钟（GHz） | GPU时钟（MHz） | CPU平均温度（°C） | GPU平均温度（°C） | |
| 系统空闲 | -- | -- | 47 | 37 |
| Prime95 压力 | 3.4 | -- | 96 | 54 |
| Witcher 3 应力 | ~0.7 | 2310 | 97 | 80 |
发言人
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
消耗功率
整体功耗明显高于我们在2022年AMD-Ampere型号上的记录。例如，仅仅在桌面上空转就会消耗14瓦至37瓦，而2022年版本仅消耗7瓦至17瓦。游戏对我们的2023设备的要求要高出37%的功率，但每瓦性能仍然非常好，因为用户获得的图形性能比移动RTX 3080 Ti高出40%至60%。
330瓦的交流适配器比330瓦的交流适配器大，用于 新的Razer Blade(~18.5 x 8.5 x 3.6 cm vs. ~18 x 7.5 x 2.5 cm)，因为Eluktronics和Uniwill还没有转移到GaN充电。当CPU和GPU各自处于100%的利用率时，我们能够记录到343W的临时最大消耗。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.54 / 14.8 Watt |
| Idle | 14 / 19.3 / 36.8 Watt |
| Load |
117.2 / 342.5 Watt |
   
| |
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 17.00 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2560x1600, 17.00 | MSI Katana 17 B13VFK i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 17.30 | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, Mini-LED, 3840x2160, 17.30 | Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT, SSSTC CA6-8D1024, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.00 | Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, SSSTC CA6-8D1024, IPS, 2560x1600, 18.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 35% | 35% | 1% | 24% | -24% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 14 | 7 50% | 12.2 13% | 14 -0% | 13 7% | 24.5 -75% |
| Idle Average * | 19.3 | 11 43% | 14.9 23% | 21.6 -12% | 16.5 15% | 34.1 -77% |
| Idle Maximum * | 36.8 | 17 54% | 15.8 57% | 24.8 33% | 17 54% | 47.7 -30% |
| Load Average * | 117.2 | 92 22% | 85.22 27% | 122.5 -5% | 93 21% | 140 -19% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 304 | 221 27% | 151.1 50% | 265 13% | 239 21% | 202 34% |
| Load Maximum * | 342.5 | 306 11% | 212.8 38% | 418 -22% | 251 27% | 261 24% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø304 (297-331)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø221 (201-226)
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø222 (209-342)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø237 (147.8-260)
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø15 (12.2-24.5)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø10.4 (8.59-15.7)
Power Consumption external Monitor
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø200 (186.7-273)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø104.9 (90.7-113.4)
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø228 (209-246)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø107.5 (105.8-112.6)
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø244 (233-275)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø210 (204-215)
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø286 (272-295)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø222 (204-233)
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø13.9 (11.7-21.4)
电池寿命
WLAN的运行时间比去年由AMD驱动的Neo 17 M22短了几个小时，总时间刚刚超过5小时。两台测试设备都被设置为平衡电源配置文件，并在iGPU上激活Optimus。
从空电到满电需要2至2.5小时。该系统不能通过USB-C充电。
| Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | MSI Katana 17 B13VFK i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 53.5 Wh | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh | Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT, 97 Wh | Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 91.7 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 76% | -42% | 5% | -5% | -21% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 305 | 537 76% | 176 -42% | 319 5% | 290 -5% | 240 -21% |
| Reader / Idle | 722 | 420 | ||||
| H.264 | 398 | 358 | 294 | |||
| Load | 109 | 58 | 86 | 107 | 80 |
Pros
+ 易于维修；2个SODIMM，2个M.2 SSD
+ 占地面积小，性能好
+ 可提供裸机配置
+ 咔嚓咔嚓的CherryMX键盘
+ 175 WGeForce GPU
Cons
- WLAN和SD读卡器可以更快
- 核心温度非常高
- 固态硬盘的性能节流
- 笨重的330瓦交流适配器
- 没有网络摄像头快门
Verdict — Turning Up The Heat A Bit Too Literally
Mech-17 GP2的体积比微星GT77 Titan的小7%，重量比微星GT77的轻17%。 微星GT77 HX Titan而提供几乎相同的性能。因此，它是密集型的，但也许有点太多。在运行游戏时，CPU温度甚至对游戏笔记本来说都非常高。尽管对于英特尔处理器来说，97摄氏度的范围在技术上是 "安全的"，但它仍然比去年的型号更热，而且对终端用户来说并不完全是安慰。高核心温度也许可以通过利用外部水冷却器扩展坞来缓解，但一台笔记本电脑不应该依赖一个可选的配件来实现最佳冷却效果。
以高核心温度为代价的高性能。
除了单位体积的高性能外，价格也是该机型的一个突出因素。Mech-17 GP2是为数不多的GeForce 40的笔记本电脑之一，带有裸机选项，这意味着如果你能提供自己的内存、SSD和操作系统，你可以节省几百美元。2999美元用于购买市场上最快的游戏笔记本电脑之一并不差；只是要确保密切关注那些核心温度。
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
-
03/08/2023 v7
Allen Ngo
Gaming - Weighted Average
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.
Pricecompare
