Notebookcheck Logo

Schenker Technologies XMG P407 (Clevo P641HK1) 笔记本电脑简短评测

简洁游戏本。Schenker这台14英寸设备能在哑光的IPS显示屏上顺利运行所有游戏。功能也很好,NVMe固态硬盘和机械硬盘的组合,16 GB的运行内存和一个很好的键盘。如果需要,也可以在其中安装LTE / UMTS调制解调器。
Gaming Geforce Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Windows
SCHENKER XMG P407
Processor
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 4 x 2.8 - 3.8 GHz, Kaby Lake
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile - 4 GB VRAM, Core: 1493 MHz, Memory: 3500 MHz, GDDR5, 128-bit-connection, ForceWare 378.49, Optimus
Memory
16 GB 
, DDR4-2400, 双通道, 两插槽 (已占用), 最高32 GB
Display
14.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, LG Philips LP140WF3-SPD1 (LGD046D), IPS, 60 Hz, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel HM175
Storage
Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e, 256 GB 
, + Seagate Barracuda ST1000LM048, 1 TB HDD @ 5400 rpm. Slots: 1x M.2-type 2280 & 1x 2.5-inch
Soundcard
Realtek ALC892 @ Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 耳机插口, 麦克风输入, S/PDIF, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC, Mini SD, MMC, RSMMC, SIM卡 插槽
Networking
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 25 x 349 x 247
Battery
45 Wh Lithium-Ion, 3 cells
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 全高清
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声, Keyboard: 巧克力键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, 电源供给: 120 瓦特, 控制中心, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.118 kg, Power Supply: 460 g
Price
1569 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Left side: Mini DisplayPort 1.4, Mini DisplayPort 1.2, HDMI, USB 3.1 Gen-1 (Type-A), USB 3.1 Gen-2 (Type-C), microphone input, headphone jack, S/PDIF
Left side: Mini DisplayPort 1.4, Mini DisplayPort 1.2, HDMI, USB 3.1 Gen-1 (Type-A), USB 3.1 Gen-2 (Type-C), microphone input, headphone jack, S/PDIF
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
SCHENKER XMG P406
 
76 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG P407
 
76 MB/s
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
 
26 MB/s -66%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
SCHENKER XMG P407
 
87 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG P406
 
86 MB/s -1%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
 
27.7 MB/s -68%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
561 MBit/s +28%
SCHENKER XMG P407
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
439 MBit/s
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168 (jseb)
312 MBit/s -29%
iperf3 receive AX12
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
513 MBit/s +7%
SCHENKER XMG P407
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
480 MBit/s
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168 (jseb)
347 MBit/s -28%
278
cd/m²
304
cd/m²
315
cd/m²
253
cd/m²
298
cd/m²
277
cd/m²
254
cd/m²
278
cd/m²
277
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
LG Philips LP140WF3-SPD1 (LGD046D) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 315 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 281.6 cd/m² Minimum: 25 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 80 %
Center on Battery: 298 cd/m²
Contrast: 1104:1 (Black: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.42 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.11 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
82% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
54% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
82.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.5
SCHENKER XMG P407
LG Philips LP140WF3-SPD1 (LGD046D), 1920x1080, 14.00
SCHENKER XMG P406
LG Philips 140WF1 (LGD040A), 1920x1080, 14.00
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
LG Philips LP140WF3-SPD1 (LGD046D), 1920x1080, 14.00
Gigabyte P34W v5
2560x1440, 14.00
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Chi Mei N156HGE-EAL, 1920x1080, 15.60
Display
2%
2%
-13%
31%
Display P3 Coverage
64.5
66.2
3%
65.2
1%
51.4
-20%
85.4
32%
sRGB Coverage
82.1
82.8
1%
83.4
2%
76.6
-7%
100
22%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
60
60.5
1%
60.9
2%
52.8
-12%
83.8
40%
Response Times
-15%
2%
9%
-1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
47 ?(14, 33)
56 ?(22, 34)
-19%
47 ?(14, 33)
-0%
41.2 ?(15.2, 26)
12%
44 ?(24, 20)
6%
Response Time Black / White *
27 ?(5, 22)
30 ?(8, 22)
-11%
26 ?(6, 20)
4%
25.4 ?(3.4, 22)
6%
29 ?(12, 17)
-7%
PWM Frequency
198 ?(90)
Screen
-1%
-1%
3%
-50%
Brightness middle
298
282
-5%
272
-9%
277.8
-7%
258
-13%
Brightness
282
266
-6%
277
-2%
270
-4%
234
-17%
Brightness Distribution
80
81
1%
84
5%
83
4%
79
-1%
Black Level *
0.27
0.22
19%
0.26
4%
0.38
-41%
0.54
-100%
Contrast
1104
1282
16%
1046
-5%
731
-34%
478
-57%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.42
4.98
-13%
4.59
-4%
2.71
39%
9.74
-120%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.57
10.2
-19%
8.49
1%
5.47
36%
14.6
-70%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.11
4.08
1%
4.28
-4%
2.11
49%
11.59
-182%
Gamma
2.5 88%
2.51 88%
2.23 99%
2.19 100%
2.19 100%
CCT
6329 103%
5877 111%
6848 95%
6314 103%
11851 55%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
54
54
0%
55
2%
48.5
-10%
76
41%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
82
83
1%
83
1%
76.9
-6%
100
22%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-5% / -2%
1% / -0%
-0% / 0%
-7% / -27%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 63 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 33 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
LatencyMon
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
5472
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
22216
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5742
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
64.1 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
8.08 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.66 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
93.8 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
738 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
149 Points
Help
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
149 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG P407
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
149 Points
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
146 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG P406
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
141 Points -5%
Gigabyte P34W v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
137 Points -8%
CPU Multi 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG P407
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
738 Points
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
730 Points -1%
Gigabyte P34W v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
680 Points -8%
SCHENKER XMG P406
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
680 Points -8%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
678 Points -8%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.16 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG P407
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.08 Points
Gigabyte P34W v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.5 Points -7%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.49 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG P406
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.45 Points -8%
CPU Single 64Bit
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.68 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG P407
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.66 Points
Gigabyte P34W v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.65 Points -1%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.65 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG P406
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.6 Points -4%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
SCHENKER XMG P407
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
22216 Points
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
21976 Points -1%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20639 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG P406
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20394 Points -8%
Gigabyte P34W v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20195 Points -9%
Rendering Single 32Bit
SCHENKER XMG P407
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5742 Points
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5568 Points -3%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5550 Points -3%
Gigabyte P34W v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5460 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG P406
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5348 Points -7%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Single-Core Score
SCHENKER XMG P407
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
3558 Points
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
3542 Points 0%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
3256 Points -8%
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
SCHENKER XMG P407
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
13693 Points
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
13346 Points -3%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
12873 Points -6%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4326 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG P407
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
4321 Points
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
4119 Points -5%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
SCHENKER XMG P407
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
14026 Points
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
13058 Points -7%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
12448 Points -11%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
252.1 Points +2%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
247.3 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG P407
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
247.2 Points
PCMark 7 Score
6266 points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4069 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5146 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5234 points
Help
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
SCHENKER XMG P407
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e
4069 Points
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
4010 Points -1%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
3899 Points -4%
Gigabyte P34W v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
3706 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG P406
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZHPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
3371 Points -17%
Work Score Accelerated v2
SCHENKER XMG P407
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e
5234 Points
SCHENKER XMG P406
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZHPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
5023 Points -4%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
4920 Points -6%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
4831 Points -8%
Gigabyte P34W v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
4649 Points -11%
PCMark 7 - Score
SCHENKER XMG P407
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e
6266 Points
Gigabyte P34W v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
6242 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG P406
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZHPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
6147 Points -2%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
5874 Points -6%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
3818 Points -39%
Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e
Sequential Read: 1345 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1502 MB/s
512K Read: 320.3 MB/s
512K Write: 1276 MB/s
4K Read: 58.9 MB/s
4K Write: 171 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 625 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 539 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG P407
Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e
SCHENKER XMG P406
Samsung SM951 MZHPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
 
Gigabyte P34W v5
Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
14%
20%
31%
-96%
Read Seq
1345
1634
21%
1977
47%
2269
69%
112.4
-92%
Write Seq
1502
1290
-14%
1668
11%
1524
1%
107.3
-93%
Read 512
320.3
1149
259%
800
150%
937
193%
43.19
-87%
Write 512
1276
1285
1%
1030
-19%
1483
16%
57
-96%
Read 4k
58.9
43.82
-26%
58.1
-1%
53.8
-9%
0.494
-99%
Write 4k
171
110.3
-35%
145.6
-15%
167.3
-2%
1.122
-99%
Read 4k QD32
625
320.5
-49%
592
-5%
622
0%
1.088
-100%
Write 4k QD32
539
287.3
-47%
508
-6%
418.9
-22%
1.234
-100%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
26084 points
3DMark 11 Performance
9921 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
83626 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
22393 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
7194 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
3766 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
2659 points
Help
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
78820 Points +46%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
61281 Points +14%
SCHENKER XMG P407
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
53978 Points
SCHENKER XMG P406
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
51975 Points -4%
Gigabyte P34W v5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
51225 Points -5%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
49539 Points -8%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
39824 Points -26%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
11622 Points +39%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
10791 Points +29%
SCHENKER XMG P407
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
8376 Points
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
7646 Points -9%
Gigabyte P34W v5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
7457 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG P406
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
7436 Points -11%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
6382 Points -24%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
15387 Points +48%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
13534 Points +30%
SCHENKER XMG P407
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
10402 Points
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
9725 Points -7%
Gigabyte P34W v5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
9691 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG P406
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
9649 Points -7%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
8223 Points -21%
low med. high ultra
Tomb Raider (2013) 360.1 258.1 199.2 98.9
BioShock Infinite (2013) 168.9 159.2 152.2 76.4
Battlefield 4 (2013) 178.6 174.9 145.7 71
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) 63.2 45.6 40.4
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 99 74.7 39.8 20.3
Battlefield 1 (2016) 142.1 122.1 62.4 56.3
Civilization VI (2016) 70.2 50.1 41.8 42.4
Titanfall 2 (2016) 143.7 136.5 68.5 58.6
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
102.3 fps +34%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
94 fps +23%
SCHENKER XMG P407
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
76.4 fps
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
72.8 fps -5%
Gigabyte P34W v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
71.4 fps -7%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
66.2 fps -13%
Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
144.9 fps +47%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
131.7 fps +33%
SCHENKER XMG P407
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
98.9 fps
Gigabyte P34W v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
87.4 fps -12%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
80.6 fps -19%
Battlefield 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4x MS
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
99.8 fps +41%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
94 fps +32%
SCHENKER XMG P407
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
71 fps
SCHENKER XMG P406
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
58.1 fps -18%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
52 fps -27%
Battlefield 1 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
SCHENKER XMG P407
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
56.3 fps
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
51.2 fps -9%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
44.4 fps -21%
Ashes of the Singularity - 1920x1080 high
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
57.4 fps +42%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
49.4 fps +22%
SCHENKER XMG P407
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
40.4 fps
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
29.1 fps -28%
Titanfall 2 - 1920x1080 Very High (Insane Texture Quality) / Enabled AA:TS AF:16x
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
78.5 fps +34%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
66.7 fps +14%
SCHENKER XMG P407
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
58.6 fps
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
45.5 fps -22%
Civilization VI - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4xMS
SCHENKER XMG P407
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
42.4 fps
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
34.1 fps -20%
Deus Ex Mankind Divided - 1920x1080 High Preset AF:4x
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
52.4 fps +32%
SCHENKER XMG P407
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
39.8 fps
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
32.2 fps -19%

Noise Level

Idle
31 / 32 / 36 dB(A)
HDD
32 dB(A)
Load
43 / 48 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
SCHENKER XMG P407
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
SCHENKER XMG P406
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
Gigabyte P34W v5
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
Noise
-5%
-9%
-2%
1%
off / environment *
29
31
-7%
30.6
-6%
Idle Minimum *
31
30
3%
35
-13%
31.6
-2%
32.5
-5%
Idle Average *
32
32
-0%
36
-13%
31.6
1%
32.5
-2%
Idle Maximum *
36
40
-11%
37
-3%
32.5
10%
32.5
10%
Load Average *
43
47
-9%
43
-0%
46.5
-8%
36.4
15%
Load Maximum *
48
51
-6%
57
-19%
52.5
-9%
52.4
-9%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 43.6 °C48.7 °C46 °C 
 43.6 °C49 °C45.7 °C 
 34.7 °C36.4 °C27 °C 
Maximum: 49 °C
Average: 41.6 °C
44.7 °C43.8 °C44 °C
40.9 °C50.8 °C48.6 °C
30.1 °C31.9 °C31.6 °C
Maximum: 50.8 °C
Average: 40.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  49 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.8 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.5 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36.4 °C / 97.5 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-7.5 °C / -13.5 F).
SCHENKER XMG P407
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
SCHENKER XMG P406
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
Gigabyte P34W v5
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
Heat
-35%
-6%
-18%
2%
Maximum Upper Side *
49
55
-12%
54
-10%
59.3
-21%
44.9
8%
Maximum Bottom *
50.8
58.7
-16%
49.4
3%
56.5
-11%
38.2
25%
Idle Upper Side *
26.3
36.9
-40%
28
-6%
27.8
-6%
27.4
-4%
Idle Bottom *
24.1
41.7
-73%
26.8
-11%
31.8
-32%
29
-20%

* ... smaller is better

Speakers

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.540.82539.236.13129.6314036.537.35027.228.46327.827.38027.429.910027.228.712522.928.316021.736.420022.650.625021.754.131519.855.940018.758.250018.161.36301867.680017.370.9100016.867.7125016.963.7160017.160.2200017.168.3250017.167.8315017.166.2400017.563.6500017.461.6630017.466.5800017.367.71000017.363.81250017.457.4160001751.5SPL29.778.2N1.342.9median 17.4median 61.6Delta0.98.229.834.234.541.330.937.32833.925.431.125.927.723.831.823.740.72347.623.253.622.355.620.954.419.762.119.16219.362.919.664.120.370.419.370.119.269.52067.41969.718.968.718.96418.764.318.763.318.864.318.956.7195518.950.718.743.431.378.81.543.8median 19.2median 62.91.16.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSCHENKER XMG P407Razer Blade (2016) FHD
SCHENKER XMG P407 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Razer Blade (2016) FHD audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.6 / 1.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 10 / 15 / 24 Watt
Load midlight 82 / 124 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
SCHENKER XMG P407
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
SCHENKER XMG P406
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
Power Consumption
-13%
-10%
3%
Idle Minimum *
10
12
-20%
14
-40%
10.6
-6%
Idle Average *
15
16
-7%
18
-20%
14.5
3%
Idle Maximum *
24
22
8%
21
12%
15
37%
Load Average *
82
90
-10%
70
15%
90
-10%
Load Maximum *
124
170
-37%
146
-18%
135
-9%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
7h 23min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 38)
4h 01min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
3h 33min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 32min
SCHENKER XMG P407
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 45 Wh
SCHENKER XMG P406
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M, 45 Wh
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 70 Wh
Gigabyte P34W v5
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M, 61 Wh
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 41 Wh
Battery Runtime
-26%
40%
-22%
-18%
Reader / Idle
443
275
-38%
760
72%
392
-12%
387
-13%
H.264
213
312
46%
217
2%
WiFi v1.3
241
197
-18%
427
77%
232
-4%
225
-7%
Load
92
72
-22%
59
-36%
47
-49%
41
-55%

Pros

+ 坚实,平整的外壳
+ 配置广泛
+ 非常好的输入设备
+ 哑光IPS显示屏
+ 接口众多
+ NVMe固态硬盘

Cons

- 能源利用率和电池续航可以更好
- 显示屏切换时间慢
- 电池模式下,性能较差
- 没有雷电3
In review: XMG P407. Test model provided by Schenker Technologies
In review: XMG P407. Test model provided by Schenker Technologies

在外观上,XMG P407与其前代没有什么不同。这就是为什么我们重点关注它的内部新特征。新的Kaby Lake处理器带来了细微的性能提升。新的处理器对电池的续航也带来了正面的影响。GeForce GTX 1050 Ti集成显卡处于Nvidia阵营的的中上流,但与上一代的许多顶级产品相比,它却具有更高的性能。换句话说:XMG P406的集成显卡GeForce GTX 970M3DMark基准测试和现实世界游戏中方面失分。

负载下的发热情况可以说是适中的:XMG P407不像其前代那样烫手。P406P407在系统噪声方面的差异很小。 然而,我们注意到一些改进:P406中的处理器风扇容易突然加速运转,非常显眼。但P407显然不存在这种情况。 该机的接口得到了进一步更新:四个USB 3.1 Type-A 第一代接口中的一个升级成了USB 3.1 Type-C 第二代接口。此外,两个迷你视频接口中的一个也符合了1.4标准。

凭借XMG P407Schenker提供了一个14英寸的全能型的游戏本。

高速NVMe固态硬盘确保了系统的快速运行。所需的存储空间由2.5英寸硬盘驱动器提供。两个驱动器都可以被更换,而且用户可以毫不费力地拆开机器的底板 。该机配备了优秀的的键盘;哑光IPS显示屏具有令人愉快的视角和良好的对比度。然而,屏幕的亮度可以更高。内置显示屏的切换时间仅比XMG P406稍好。

 

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里

Schenker Technologies XMG P407 (Clevo P641HK1) Notebook Review

 

 

SCHENKER XMG P407 - 03/06/2017 v6(old)
Sascha Mölck

Chassis
76 / 98 → 78%
Keyboard
83%
Pointing Device
86%
Connectivity
66 / 81 → 82%
Weight
62 / 10-66 → 93%
Battery
73%
Display
86%
Games Performance
90%
Application Performance
94%
Temperature
86 / 95 → 90%
Noise
76 / 90 → 84%
Audio
71%
Camera
52 / 85 → 61%
Average
77%
85%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Schenker Technologies XMG P407 (Clevo P641HK1) 笔记本电脑简短评测
Sascha Mölck, 2017-03-27 (Update: 2017-04- 2)