Notebookcheck

华硕 FX553VD (7700HQ, GTX 1050) 笔记本简短评测

Christian Hintze (translated by Delta Zhang), 05/13/2017
Gaming Geforce Notebook Windows

追寻超凡。 我们对华硕 FX553VD进行了测试以及评估,以检验其是否达到华硕 “追寻超凡”的理念,亦或是华硕仍需要继续追寻。相比于同厂同价位搭载 GTX 1060 的型号,这台笔记本是否有足够的优点来让消费者购买。

Asus FX553VD-DM249T (FX Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 2.8 GHz @ 3.8 GHz
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) - 2048 MB, NVIDIA, Umschaltbar auf Intel HD Graphics 630
Memory
8192 MB 
, 1槽占用
Display
15.6 inch 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 141 PPI, 非触控屏, BOE, TN, 型号: BOE CQ NT156FHM-N41, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel HM175
Storage
Hynix HFS128G39TND, 128 GB 
, 第二储存设备: 希捷笔记本硬盘 1TB ST1000LM035
Soundcard
Conexant @ Intel Skylake PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 1 符合麦克风/耳机 接口, Card Reader: Realtek PCIE 读卡器
Networking
Realtek RTL8168B/8111B (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n/ac), Bluetooth Intel(R) Wireless Bluetooth(R)
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 31 x 385 x 258
Battery
48 Wh Lithium-Ion, 4 芯
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 高清网络摄像头
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声扬声器, Keyboard: 红色背光巧克力键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.378 kg, Power Supply: 571 g
Price
1070 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Back: no features
Back: no features
Right: USB 2.0 port A, slot for Kensington-Lock, and dummy DVD drawer
Right: USB 2.0 port A, slot for Kensington-Lock, and dummy DVD drawer
Front: speakers and memory card reader
Front: speakers and memory card reader
Left: LAN, HDMI, 2x USB-3.0 Type-A, USB 3.0 Type-C, headphone/microphone jack
Left: LAN, HDMI, 2x USB-3.0 Type-A, USB 3.0 Type-C, headphone/microphone jack
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
635 MBit/s ∼100% +22%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
541 MBit/s ∼85% +4%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
533 MBit/s ∼84% +2%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
521 MBit/s ∼82%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168 (jseb)
347 MBit/s ∼55% -33%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (jseb)
246 MBit/s ∼39% -53%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
666 MBit/s ∼100%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
653 MBit/s ∼98% -2%
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
532 MBit/s ∼80% -20%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
513 MBit/s ∼77% -23%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168 (jseb)
312 MBit/s ∼47% -53%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (jseb)
306 MBit/s ∼46% -54%
222
cd/m²
218
cd/m²
221
cd/m²
219
cd/m²
225
cd/m²
219
cd/m²
205
cd/m²
206
cd/m²
204
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 225 cd/m² Average: 215.4 cd/m² Minimum: 12.6 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 227 cd/m²
Contrast: 489:1 (Black: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.94 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 2.68 | - Ø
57% sRGB (Argyll) 36% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.35
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
BOE, , 1920x1080, 15.6
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Chi Mei N156HGE-EAL, , 1920x1080, 15.6
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
AU Optronics AUO41ED, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
LG Philips LGD0550 / LP156WF6-SPK4, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
AU Optronics AUO38ED B156HTN 28H80, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus FX502VM-AS73
1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
-83%
-75%
-30%
-106%
-35%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
43 (24, 19, plateau)
44 (24, 20)
-2%
44.4 (15.2, 29.2)
-3%
22 (10, 12)
49%
36 (17, 19)
16%
28.4 (11.2, 17.2)
34%
Response Time Black / White *
11 (7, 4)
29 (12, 17)
-164%
27.2 (6.8, 20.4)
-147%
23 (13, 10)
-109%
36 (19, 17)
-227%
22.4 (6, 16.4)
-104%
PWM Frequency
198 (90)
Screen
-40%
-13%
3%
-82%
-10%
Brightness
215
234
9%
193
-10%
257
20%
235
9%
205
-5%
Brightness Distribution
91
79
-13%
75
-18%
85
-7%
75
-18%
92
1%
Black Level *
0.46
0.54
-17%
0.19
59%
0.32
30%
0.55
-20%
0.69
-50%
Contrast
489
478
-2%
1104
126%
878
80%
447
-9%
304
-38%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.94
9.74
-147%
7.8
-98%
5.16
-31%
10.97
-178%
4.7
-19%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.68
11.59
-332%
7.3
-172%
4.57
-71%
14.25
-432%
1.8
33%
Gamma
2.35 102%
21.9 11%
2.39 100%
2.59 93%
1.83 131%
2.23 108%
CCT
6709 97%
11851 55%
5771 113%
6931 94%
11200 58%
6975 93%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
36
76
111%
39.3
9%
37
3%
35
-3%
36.2
1%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
57
100
75%
56.5
-1%
58
2%
55
-4%
56.6
-1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-62% / -48%
-44% / -26%
-14% / -3%
-94% / -87%
-23% / -15%

* ... smaller is better

ColorChecker
ColorChecker
Grayscale
Grayscale
Saturation
Saturation

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 24 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected90 % brightness setting

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8568 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
162 Points ∼81% +11%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
159 Points ∼80% +9%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
151 Points ∼76% +3%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
146 Points ∼73% 0%
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD)
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
146 Points ∼73% 0%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
146 Points ∼73%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
140 Points ∼70% -4%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
741 Points ∼34% +1%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
733 Points ∼34%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
730 Points ∼34% 0%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
725 Points ∼34% -1%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
724 Points ∼34% -1%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
719 Points ∼33% -2%
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD)
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
508 Points ∼24% -31%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.82 Points ∼80% +9%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.67 Points ∼74% 0%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.67 Points ∼74%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.65 Points ∼73% -1%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.16 Points ∼3% 0%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.14 Points ∼3%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7.99 Points ∼3% -2%
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
6.81 Points ∼3% -16%
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6832
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
28648
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
7647
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
0.94 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.67 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
8.14 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
0.99 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
146 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
733 Points
Help
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6
5068 Points ∼78% +1%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND
5040 Points ∼77%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
4831 Points ∼74% -4%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
4442 Points ∼68% -12%
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP
2880 Points ∼44% -43%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
2722 Points ∼42% -46%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
4765 Points ∼80% +24%
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP
4182 Points ∼70% +9%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
3899 Points ∼65% +2%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6
3850 Points ∼64% 0%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND
3832 Points ∼64%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
3565 Points ∼60% -7%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3832 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5040 points
Help
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
Hynix HFS128G39TND
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
Toshiba MQ01ABD100
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
Intel SSDSCKKF256H6
Asus FX502VM-AS73
SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-80%
44%
-84%
50%
-3%
Write 4k QD32
136.4
1.234
-99%
140.2
3%
0.893
-99%
255.1
87%
99.74
-27%
Read 4k QD32
348.2
1.088
-100%
400.9
15%
0.718
-100%
279.6
-20%
369.9
6%
Write 4k
76.76
1.122
-99%
89.84
17%
0.846
-99%
85.44
11%
70.91
-8%
Read 4k
29.74
0.494
-98%
33.12
11%
0.327
-99%
27.11
-9%
29.36
-1%
Write 512
136.9
56.98
-58%
185.4
35%
28.31
-79%
304
122%
137.8
1%
Read 512
340.9
43.19
-87%
399.7
17%
28.33
-92%
338.9
-1%
343.5
1%
Write Seq
136.2
107.3
-21%
476.6
250%
100.6
-26%
422.8
210%
138.2
1%
Read Seq
503.7
112.4
-78%
522.1
4%
101.5
-80%
485.8
-4%
502.5
0%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus FX502VM-AS73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
14732 Points ∼29% +92%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
9768 Points ∼19% +27%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
9725 Points ∼19% +27%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8223 Points ∼16% +7%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7664 Points ∼15%
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7564 Points ∼15% -1%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus FX502VM-AS73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
11633 Points ∼29% +91%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7791 Points ∼19% +28%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7646 Points ∼19% +25%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
6382 Points ∼16% +5%
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
6100 Points ∼15% 0%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
6094 Points ∼15%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Score
Asus FX502VM-AS73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
9845 Points ∼42% +79%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
6774 Points ∼29% +23%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
6709 Points ∼29% +22%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5729 Points ∼25% +4%
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5528 Points ∼24% 0%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5508 Points ∼24%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus FX502VM-AS73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
80496 Points ∼49% +115%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
49539 Points ∼30% +32%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
46362 Points ∼28% +24%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
39824 Points ∼24% +6%
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
38748 Points ∼24% +3%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
37469 Points ∼23%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Score
Asus FX502VM-AS73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
25979 Points ∼53% +33%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
21998 Points ∼44% +13%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
20791 Points ∼42% +7%
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
19978 Points ∼40% +2%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
19877 Points ∼40% +2%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
19501 Points ∼39%
3DMark 11 Performance
7471 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
19501 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
5508 points
Help
012345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
25.2 (min: 19) fps ∼100% +10%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND
23 fps ∼91%
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP
21.4 fps ∼85% -7%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
45.8 (min: 30) fps ∼100% +29%
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP
39.9 fps ∼87% +12%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND
35.6 fps ∼78%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP
70.1 fps ∼100% +12%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND
62.7 fps ∼89%
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP
120.4 fps ∼100% +32%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND
91 fps ∼76%
Rise of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
61.3 fps ∼100% +92%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6
38.3 fps ∼62% +20%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
33.7 fps ∼55% +5%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND
32 fps ∼52%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6
46.6 fps ∼100% +23%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
39.5 fps ∼85% +4%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND
38 fps ∼82%
1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6
86.6 fps ∼100% +31%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
70 fps ∼81% +6%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND
66 fps ∼76%
1024x768 Lowest Preset
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND
120 fps ∼100%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6
117.5 fps ∼98% -2%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
115.3 fps ∼96% -4%
Doom
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
95.1 fps ∼100% +121%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6
67.5 fps ∼71% +57%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND
43 fps ∼45%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6
69.1 fps ∼100% +57%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND
44 fps ∼64%
1920x1080 Medium Preset
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6
73.3 fps ∼100% +36%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND
54 fps ∼74%
1366x768 Medium Preset
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6
105.3 fps ∼100% +46%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND
72 fps ∼68%
1280x720 Low Preset
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6
117 fps ∼100% +14%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND
103 fps ∼88%
low med. high ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 9162.735.623fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 120663832fps
Doom (2016) 103724443fps

Noise Level

Idle
32.9 / 32.9 / 33.5 dB(A)
HDD
32.9 dB(A)
Load
43.7 / 47 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 30.8 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2048.34242.435.148.32541.340.53933.841.33136.539.233.830.636.54033.832.933.728.633.85033.432.131.428.633.46333.634.93130.633.68032.631.932.327.232.610032.93428.726.532.912529.929.426.42629.916030.730.427.225.130.720028.527.926.323.928.525028.928.425.122.228.9315302825.622.33040029.9282621.429.950030.928.223.120.430.963031.428.822.419.631.480034.931.92318.734.910003632.722.418.236125033.531.120.71833.5160037.735.220.117.937.7200040.33719.617.540.3250037.933.719.117.237.931503531.719.217.235400030.726.1191730.7500028.42419.117.228.463002621.91917.126800023.220.618.917.123.210000212018.917.1211250020.119.618.816.920.11600020.119.61916.920.1SPL46.943.732.930.346.9N5.24.11.91.45.2median 30.7Asus FX553VD-DM249Tmedian 28.4median 20.7median 18median 30.7Delta3.53.932.83.5hearing rangehide median Fan Noise
Max. Load
 39.2 °C36 °C28.2 °C 
 44.2 °C33.5 °C27.1 °C 
 41.4 °C31.5 °C26.4 °C 
Maximum: 44.2 °C
Average: 34.2 °C
24.3 °C30.5 °C40 °C
24.9 °C33.1 °C38 °C
25 °C26.6 °C28.8 °C
Maximum: 40 °C
Average: 30.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  46 °C | Room Temperature 23.4 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.5 / 0.6 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 4 / 6.7 / 9.6 Watt
Load midlight 81 / 107 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Hynix HFS128G39TND, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Toshiba MQ01ABD100, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Intel SSDSCKKF256H6, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus FX502VM-AS73
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Power Consumption
-75%
-34%
-38%
-3%
-105%
Idle Minimum *
4
10.6
-165%
8.29
-107%
7
-75%
4.4
-10%
14.9
-273%
Idle Average *
6.7
14.5
-116%
8.9
-33%
10.2
-52%
6.8
-1%
15.1
-125%
Idle Maximum *
9.6
15
-56%
10.2
-6%
14
-46%
8.3
14%
15.2
-58%
Load Average *
81
90
-11%
77.1
5%
78
4%
81
-0%
105.8
-31%
Load Maximum *
107
135
-26%
136.6
-28%
127
-19%
127
-19%
148.8
-39%
Witcher 3 ultra *
90

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
9h 47min
WiFi Surfing
0h 00min
WiFi Surfing v1.3
6h 00min
Load (maximum brightness)
0h 56min
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 48 Wh
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 41 Wh
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 63.3 Wh
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 52.5 Wh
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 74 Wh
Asus FX502VM-AS73
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 64 Wh
Battery Runtime
-33%
59%
-5%
73%
-16%
Reader / Idle
587
387
-34%
961
64%
322
-45%
1174
100%
363
-38%
WiFi v1.3
360
225
-37%
389
8%
302
-16%
622
73%
277
-23%
Load
56
41
-27%
115
105%
81
45%
81
45%
64
14%
H.264
217
455

Pros

+ 坚实的性能
+ 低功耗
+ 安静的按键
+ 体积紧凑

Cons

- 中庸的TN面板
- 风扇一直工作
- 仅有带有2GB显存的GTX1050
- 强度不足的外壳
- 键盘出发压力欠缺
- 令人讨厌的热量分布
The Asus FX553VD, provided by: Notebooksbilliger.de
The Asus FX553VD, provided by: Notebooksbilliger.de

华硕 FX553实际上是一台中高端多媒体笔记本,但它也是一台入门级游戏设备。将FX553当作一台多媒体笔记本来看的话它能得到更好的分数,所以我们将它列入这个分类当中。在这个分类下,FX553的评分将会上升两分,是它成为一台表现较为全面的设备。单单从性能来说,FX553并不弱,其搭载的硬件很好的兑现了它自身的承诺。但其他部分大多就仅仅是平均水平而已。

我们认为FX53最糟糕的地方在于它的外壳强度不足过于柔软,键盘触发压力欠佳,再者就是亮度及对比度都不足的屏幕,最后是在左侧表面上过高的发热。

从另一方面来说,选择购买它并不是一个太错误的选择。你会得到一台实惠的游戏及多媒体应用笔记本,它能够流畅的运行当下所有的游戏且发热及噪音尚可接受。当然你需要衡量一下是否选择购买稍贵一点搭载 GTX 1060 的“真正”的游戏本FX502。FX502在游戏中的表现几乎是FX553的两倍,但同时也更热噪音也更大。所以这是一个需要做出妥协的决定,一边是性能,另一边是温度/噪音/重量。

华硕 FX553VD 性能强大,外观上附有吸引力,但从技术角度来说也仅是一台不显眼的全能型设备。

相比于其他配置相近的竞品,FX553处于中下水平。它和MSI的产品几乎相同,其他例如来自惠普和戴尔的设备会更好一点。考虑到其所提供的配置,我们认为1100欧元(约合1177美元)的价格几乎是太高了。有些竞品在略低于1000欧元(约合1070美元)的价位上,而且并不比FX553差。即便是来自同一家厂商的FX502,仅仅贵了100到200欧元(约合107到214美元),便搭载有16G内存以及GTX1060.

当真正的设备摆在眼前时,“追寻超凡”变得十分困难。整体设计及低功耗也许最“超凡”的,但其余部分却仅是不出众的平均水平。其目标用户应该是那些想要一台有着相对较强性能的多媒体笔记本但不是很在乎制造工艺及细节的用户。华硕 FX553 不是太贵,不是太重,不是太吵,也不是太热。它运行速度很快,但并不是一台高端设备。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里

Asus FX553VD-DM249T - 04/19/2017 v6
Christian Hintze

Chassis
78 / 98 → 79%
Keyboard
83%
Pointing Device
78%
Connectivity
48 / 81 → 60%
Weight
61 / 67 → 86%
Battery
88%
Display
82%
Games Performance
88 / 85 → 100%
Application Performance
91 / 92 → 99%
Temperature
75%
Noise
76 / 95 → 80%
Audio
72%
Camera
55 / 85 → 65%
Average
75%
83%
Multimedia - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华硕 FX553VD (7700HQ, GTX 1050) 笔记本简短评测
Christian Hintze, 2017-05-13 (Update: 2017-05-13)