Notebookcheck

技嘉 P57X v7 游戏笔记本电脑简短评测

Steve Schardein (translated by Yuchen Wang), 02/05/2017
Windows Notebook Kaby Lake Gaming Geforce

略有进步。自从我们最早评测P57X以来它并没有过太大的改变。不过一颗最新Kaby Lake处理器,更大容量内存和一块大幅改进的4K屏幕,可以让它更值得考虑吗?

Gigabyte P57X v7 (P57 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 2.8 GHz
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) - 8192 MB, Core: 1443 - 1645 MHz, Memory: 8000 MHz, 21.21.13.7586 - nVIDIA ForceWare 375.86
Memory
32768 MB 
, DDR4-2400, 双通道 (16 GB x 2)
Display
17.3 inch 16:9, 3840x2160 pixel 255 PPI, 无, SHP145E, IPS, glossy: no
Storage
Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800), 256 GB 
Soundcard
Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 耳机/麦克风接口, Card Reader: SD
Networking
Realtek Gaming GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Optical drive
HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUD0N
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 31 x 418 x 296
Battery
75.81 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Camera
Webcam: 高清 720p
Primary Camera: 1 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 2 x 2瓦 扬声器, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
3.412 kg, Power Supply: 938 g

 

Front: DVD-RAM (hot swap bay)
Front: DVD-RAM (hot swap bay)
Rear: No connections
Rear: No connections
Left: Kensington Lock, Gigabit Ethernet, USB 3.0 x 2, SD card reader, headphones, microphone
Left: Kensington Lock, Gigabit Ethernet, USB 3.0 x 2, SD card reader, headphones, microphone
Right: USB 3.0, USB 3.1 Type-C, HDMI, mini-DP (beneath removable cover), VGA, charging port
Right: USB 3.0, USB 3.1 Type-C, HDMI, mini-DP (beneath removable cover), VGA, charging port
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
166 MB/s ∼100% +112%
Gigabyte P57X v7
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78.2 MB/s ∼47%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78 MB/s ∼47% 0%
Gigabyte P57X v6
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76.4 MB/s ∼46% -2%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
224 MB/s ∼100% +148%
Gigabyte P57X v7
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
90.4 MB/s ∼40%
Gigabyte P57X v6
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
89.9 MB/s ∼40% -1%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
88 MB/s ∼39% -3%
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m 512KB
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
507 MBit/s ∼100% +4%
Gigabyte P57X v7
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
487 MBit/s ∼96%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 512KB
Gigabyte P57X v7
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
619 MBit/s ∼100%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
497 MBit/s ∼80% -20%
385.3
cd/m²
430.2
cd/m²
407.3
cd/m²
380.5
cd/m²
441.3
cd/m²
402.6
cd/m²
395.9
cd/m²
425.8
cd/m²
400
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Maximum: 441.3 cd/m² Average: 407.7 cd/m² Minimum: 14.29 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 441.3 cd/m²
Contrast: 1003:1 (Black: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.1 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | - Ø
100% sRGB (Argyll) 87% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.08
Gigabyte P57X v7
SHP145E, IPS, 17.3, 3840x2160
Gigabyte P57X v6
LGD0469, IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), IPS, 17.3, 3840x2160
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN LED, 17.3, 1920x1080
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
IPS, 17.3, 3840x2160
Response Times
43%
41%
69%
16%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
55.6
33.6
40%
37
33%
26
53%
45.6
18%
Response Time Black / White *
46.8
25.6
45%
24
49%
7
85%
35.2
25%
PWM Frequency
1000
1042
4%
Screen
-9%
10%
-25%
1%
Brightness
408
321
-21%
320
-22%
284
-30%
360
-12%
Brightness Distribution
86
93
8%
88
2%
85
-1%
81
-6%
Black Level *
0.44
0.267
39%
0.25
43%
0.25
43%
0.4
9%
Contrast
1003
1233
23%
1344
34%
1228
22%
998
0%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.1
5.93
-16%
3.61
29%
9.65
-89%
4.78
6%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.3
6.72
-56%
4.78
-11%
10.07
-134%
3.8
12%
Gamma
2.08 115%
2.12 113%
2.32 103%
2.12 113%
2.03 118%
CCT
7345 88%
7611 85%
6185 105%
12145 54%
7288 89%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
87
57
-34%
88
1%
75
-14%
86.9
0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
87
-13%
100
0%
100
0%
100
0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
17% / 2%
26% / 16%
22% / -7%
9% / 5%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
46.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.4 ms rise
↘ 36.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (27.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
55.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.4 ms rise
↘ 37.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (43.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 1000 Hz29 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 1000 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 29 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 1000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 59 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 4287 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z CPU
CPU-Z CPU
CPU-Z Caches
CPU-Z Caches
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Memory
CPU-Z Memory
CPU-Z RAM SPD
CPU-Z RAM SPD
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
ComputeMark
ComputeMark
LantencyMon
LantencyMon
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.95 Points ∼29% +14%
Gigabyte P57X v7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.71 Points ∼26%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
1.68 Points ∼25% -2%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.5 Points ∼22% -12%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
Intel Core i7-7820HK
9.6 Points ∼48% +19%
Gigabyte P57X v7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.04 Points ∼40%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
7.75 Points ∼39% -4%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.44 Points ∼37% -7%
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
Intel Core i7-7820HK
172 Points ∼77% +13%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
152 Points ∼68% 0%
Gigabyte P57X v7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
152 Points ∼68%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
141 Points ∼63% -7%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
140 Points ∼63% -8%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
Intel Core i7-7820HK
864 Points ∼46% +17%
Gigabyte P57X v7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
736 Points ∼40%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
706 Points ∼38% -4%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
656 Points ∼35% -11%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
635 Points ∼34% -14%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
374.425 s * ∼4% -10%
Gigabyte P57X v7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
340.3 s * ∼4%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
224.726 s * ∼3% +34%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
572.296 Seconds * ∼3% -5%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
553 Seconds * ∼2% -1%
Gigabyte P57X v7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
546 Seconds * ∼2%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.71 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
8.04 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
62.52 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
152 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
736 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
93.94 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Help
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
5014 Points ∼77% +19%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
4623 Points ∼71% +10%
Gigabyte P57X v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
4218 Points ∼65%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
7780 Points ∼84% +51%
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
5192 Points ∼56% +1%
Gigabyte P57X v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
5161 Points ∼55%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
2303 Points ∼25% -55%
Home Score Accelerated v2
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
4437 Points ∼74% +24%
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
4206 Points ∼70% +18%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
4060 Points ∼68% +14%
Gigabyte P57X v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
3569 Points ∼60%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3569 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5161 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4218 points
Help
Gigabyte P57X v7
Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
Gigabyte P57X v6
Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL (RAID 0)
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-2%
352%
174%
Write 4k QD32
296
274.9
-7%
553.5
87%
386.8
31%
Read 4k QD32
281.3
273.9
-3%
657.8
134%
601.1
114%
Write 4k
82.25
84.59
3%
141.3
72%
145.2
77%
Read 4k
26.04
25.93
0%
51.06
96%
51.61
98%
Write 512
306.1
314.4
3%
2445
699%
1254
310%
Read 512
315
303.1
-4%
1776
464%
1044
231%
Write Seq
305.7
315.4
3%
2572
741%
1249
309%
Read Seq
516.8
481.7
-7%
3219
523%
1658
221%
Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
Transfer Rate Minimum: 359.5 MB/s
Transfer Rate Maximum: 411.8 MB/s
Transfer Rate Average: 400.7 MB/s
Access Time: 0.1 ms
Burst Rate: 83.3 MB/s
CPU Usage: 2.3 %
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
10945 Points ∼68% +20%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
9550 Points ∼60% +5%
Gigabyte P57X v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
9116 Points ∼57%
Gigabyte P57X v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
8366 Points ∼52% -8%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
7795 Points ∼49% -14%
1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
28675 Points ∼56% +23%
Gigabyte P57X v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
23356 Points ∼46% 0%
Gigabyte P57X v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
23243 Points ∼46%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
22427 Points ∼44% -4%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
21228 Points ∼42% -9%
3DMark
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
Gigabyte P57X v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
4005 Points ∼40%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
3957 Points ∼39% -1%
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics
Gigabyte P57X v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
8357 Points ∼62% +1%
Gigabyte P57X v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
8236 Points ∼61%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
8057 Points ∼59% -2%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
21026 Points ∼52% +22%
Gigabyte P57X v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
17170 Points ∼42%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
17106 Points ∼42% 0%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
15718 Points ∼39% -8%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
127933 Points ∼78% +70%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
100453 Points ∼61% +34%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
84341 Points ∼52% +12%
Gigabyte P57X v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
79578 Points ∼49% +6%
Gigabyte P57X v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
75190 Points ∼46%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
258199 Points ∼67% +123%
Gigabyte P57X v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
123302 Points ∼32% +6%
Gigabyte P57X v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
116033 Points ∼30%
3DMark 06 Standard
28053 points
3DMark 11 Performance
16753 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
24337 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
13444 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
7498 points
Help
Batman: Arkham Knight - 3840x2160 High / On (Interactive Smoke & Paper Debris Off) AA:SM AF:8x (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
47 fps ∼81%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
45 fps ∼78% -4%
Mafia 2 - 1920x1080 high AA:0x AF:16x (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
156.3 fps ∼71%
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
43 fps ∼55%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
37.4 fps ∼48% -13%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
40.6 fps ∼52% -6%
Sleeping Dogs - 1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:Extreme (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
116.3 fps ∼79%
Fallout 4 - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:T AF:16x (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
42 fps ∼46%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
44.3 fps ∼48% +5%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
130 fps ∼60%
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
123.8 fps ∼58% -5%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
131.8 fps ∼61% +1%
low med. high ultra4K
Mafia 2 (2010) 156.3fps
Sleeping Dogs (2012) 116.3fps
BioShock Infinite (2013) 130fps
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) 47fps
Fallout 4 (2015) 42fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 43fps

Noise Level

Idle
30.4 / 32.1 / 32.1 dB(A)
Load
45.6 / 51.5 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
Gigabyte P57X v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL (RAID 0)
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
Noise
-4%
-7%
-6%
-4%
off / environment *
29
29.7
-2%
31
-7%
30
-3%
29.2
-1%
Idle Minimum *
30.4
33.2
-9%
33
-9%
34
-12%
33.9
-12%
Idle Average *
32.1
33.2
-3%
34
-6%
35
-9%
33.9
-6%
Idle Maximum *
32.1
33.2
-3%
40
-25%
37
-15%
33.9
-6%
Load Average *
45.6
47.5
-4%
44
4%
39
14%
43.8
4%
Load Maximum *
51.5
52.5
-2%
50
3%
56
-9%
53.4
-4%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 26.8 °C51.2 °C39.2 °C 
 27.8 °C38.8 °C41.4 °C 
 23.6 °C21.6 °C20.4 °C 
Maximum: 51.2 °C
Average: 32.3 °C
35.8 °C56.8 °C27 °C
27.4 °C28 °C21.8 °C
20.8 °C21 °C22.8 °C
Maximum: 56.8 °C
Average: 29 °C
Power Supply (max.)  53 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.732.838.72535.332.235.33133.634.733.64032.634.332.65030.432.930.46331.23031.28030.929.930.910030.830.630.812532.332.432.316034.427.434.42003926.43925045.225.345.23154626.34640046.925.846.950051.325.451.363054.524.454.580051.424.551.4100054.423.554.4125059.123.559.116005924.359200058.623.258.6250061.922.661.9315061.422.861.4400061.322.961.35000582358630050.122.750.1800056.722.856.71000056.822.856.81250051.322.951.31600047.822.947.8SPL70.535.770.5N25.42.525.4median 51.4Gigabyte P57X v7median 23.5median 51.4Delta5.82.15.843.943.736.635.230.130.332.638.131.634.529.941.530.947.829.550.9255322.758.922.568.521.769.720.771.820.27719.875.419.471.418.972.319.472.619.2712067.318.96818.474.718.473.618.166.518.365.618.468.118.46418.462.318.56118.555.831.183.11.560.7median 19.2Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LGmedian 68.11.64.8hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Gigabyte P57X v7 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.46 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 90% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 17%, worst was 32%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 17%, worst was 32%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.37 / 0.8 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 15.7 / 23.4 / 23.5 Watt
Load midlight 184.6 / 233.1 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Gigabyte P57X v7
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3
Gigabyte P57X v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL (RAID 0), TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3
Power Consumption
-2%
-31%
-38%
-32%
Idle Minimum *
15.7
18.4
-17%
25
-59%
29
-85%
27.3
-74%
Idle Average *
23.4
22.8
3%
35
-50%
35
-50%
34.9
-49%
Idle Maximum *
23.5
24
-2%
46
-96%
40
-70%
37.6
-60%
Load Average *
184.6
175.5
5%
103
44%
94
49%
164.4
11%
Load Maximum *
233.1
229.5
2%
223
4%
315
-35%
202.5
13%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
4h 16min
WiFi Surfing v1.3
2h 35min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 38min
Gigabyte P57X v7
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 75.81 Wh
Gigabyte P57X v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 75.81 Wh
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 88 Wh
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 75.2 Wh
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 74.48 Wh
Battery Runtime
33%
10%
3%
-15%
Reader / Idle
256
418
63%
278
9%
242
-5%
Load
98
103
5%
89
-9%
55
-44%
WiFi v1.3
155
201
30%
200
29%
160
3%
160
3%

Pros

+ 强劲的显卡性能;大部分游戏可以在4K高设定下运行
+ 迅速的系统响应
+ 大幅改进的4K屏幕
+ 不错的平均运行温度
+ 实用的系统管理软件
+ 作为17.3寸设备相对便携
+ 拓展插槽十分实用

Cons

- 塑料机身(测试机上有裂痕)
- 较差的触控版按键
- 在负载下有两个较烫的位置,键盘略热
- 相对噪音较大,相比v6稍有改善
- 电池续航相比以前明显缩短
In review: Gigabyte P57X v7. Test model provided by Gigabyte.
In review: Gigabyte P57X v7. Test model provided by Gigabyte.

实话实说,相比前代P57X v6最新的v7并没有什么太大的变化。它们采用了同样的机身(塑料,相对轻盈便携),相似的布局和内部组件,相同的接口,甚至相同的显卡和固态硬盘。v7的最大(可以感觉到的)区别应该是搭配了Kaby Lake酷睿 i7-7700HQ处理器,更高分辨率的高品质4K屏幕,和翻倍的内存(同时内存频率也有所提高)。

整体上,尽管市场上还有不少速度更快、品质更高的游戏本,但技嘉P57X v7依然是一台搭配了绚丽屏幕的强劲设备。

除此之外,它还有了相对更低的风扇噪音和发热量(尽管仍然在一些位置温度很高),和大幅提升的屏幕品质带来的画质飞跃(更高的亮度,色域覆盖和分辨率)。不过,前代机型的一些缺点也依然存在。它的机身品质有些难登大雅之堂,屏幕上盖显得十分单薄。它也依然十分吵(尽管搭配了易用的风扇控制软件),同时触控版还是低于平均水平。电池续航相比前代机型反而退步,尽管它搭配了更高分辨率的屏幕和更大容量内存,功耗的数据依然有些高得出乎我们意料。当然它仍然是一台游戏笔记本电脑,电池续航并不是最重要的方面。

它屏幕的响应速度并不算快,这可能会对一些射击游戏和其他需要快速反应的游戏带来负面的影响。对于其他类型的游戏,这倒不是太大的问题(接近连接电视玩游戏)。选择1080p面板可以一定程度上缓解这些问题(v6的屏幕响应速度更快),鱼与熊掌不可兼得。

整体上,尽管市场上还有不少速度更快、品质更高的游戏本,但技嘉P57X v7依然是一台搭配了绚丽屏幕的强劲设备。它可以轻松应对大部分的挑战,同时对未来的升级也有不小预留空间。如果你不打算长时间用电池也不在意品质一般的机身和触控版的话,它是个不错的选择。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

Gigabyte P57X v7 - 04/25/2017 v6
Steve Schardein

Chassis
74 / 98 → 76%
Keyboard
79%
Pointing Device
67%
Connectivity
67 / 81 → 83%
Weight
54 / 66 → 79%
Battery
67%
Display
88%
Games Performance
95%
Application Performance
86%
Temperature
88 / 95 → 93%
Noise
76 / 90 → 84%
Audio
40%
Camera
69 / 85 → 81%
Average
73%
82%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 技嘉 P57X v7 游戏笔记本电脑简短评测
Steve Schardein, 2017-02- 5 (Update: 2017-02- 5)