Notebookcheck

微星 GE72VR 6RF Apache Pro 笔记本电脑简短评测

Sebastian Bade (translated by Yuchen Wang), 01/14/2017
Gaming Geforce Notebook Skylake Windows

阿帕奇在接近!著名游戏笔记本生产商微星为我们带来了一台配置不俗的设备。一颗Skylake架构高速四核处理器和一块帕斯卡显卡为这款最新机型提供动力。请阅读我们的详尽评测了解它的组件是否能够分工协作发挥最大潜能。

MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 (GE72 Series)
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) - 6144 MB, Core: 1405 MHz, Memory: 4000 MHz, GDDR5 (三星), ForceWare 376.33, Nvidia Optimus
Memory
16384 MB 
, 2x 8 GB DDR4-2400 SO-DIMM, 双通道, 两个内存槽均已占用, 最高支持 32 GB
Display
17.3 inch 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 127 PPI, N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN LED, 120Hz, 全高清, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel HM170 (Skylake PCH-H)
Storage
Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY, 256 GB 
, SSD + HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630, 1TB 机械硬盘 @ 7200 rpm. 硬盘槽: 1x m.2 (可选 PCIe/NVMe), 1x 2.5寸
Soundcard
Realtek ALC899 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 2x 3.5毫米接口 (耳机,麦克风), Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC, Brightness Sensor
Networking
Killer e2400 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.0
Optical drive
HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUD0N
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 32 x 420 x 288
Battery
51 Wh, 4730 mAh Lithium-Ion, 6 芯
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 高清, 720p @ 30 fps
Additional features
Speakers: 4x 2瓦扬声器, 1x 3瓦低音炮, Keyboard: 孤岛式, 3 三区域 (全彩背光), Keyboard Light: yes, 电源适配器:180瓦,配件:快速开始说明, 软件: Dragon Center, MSI True Color, Nahimic 2, Steel Series Engine 3, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.99 kg, Power Supply: 590 g
Price
1750 EUR

 

Size Comparison

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
78 MB/s ∼100% +290%
Aorus X7 v6
78 MB/s ∼100% +290%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
76 MB/s ∼97% +280%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
72.6 MB/s ∼93% +263%
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292
68.1 MB/s ∼87% +241%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
23.8 MB/s ∼31% +19%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
20 MB/s ∼26%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
88 MB/s ∼100% +340%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
87 MB/s ∼99% +335%
Aorus X7 v6
87 MB/s ∼99% +335%
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292
86.2 MB/s ∼98% +331%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
84.6 MB/s ∼96% +323%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
27.6 MB/s ∼31% +38%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
20 MB/s ∼23%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
676 MBit/s ∼100% +119%
Aorus X7 v6
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
496 MBit/s ∼73% +61%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
308 MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Aorus X7 v6
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
554 MBit/s ∼100% +85%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
529 MBit/s ∼95% +77%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
299 MBit/s ∼54%

MSI Dragon Center

MSI Dragon Center, APP-Portal
APP-Portal
MSI Dragon Center, System Monitor
System Monitor
MSI Dragon Center, LED-Assistent
LED-Assistent
MSI Dragon Center, System Tuner
System Tuner
MSI Dragon Center, Mobile Center
Mobile Center
MSI Dragon Center, Tools & Help
Tools & Help

MSI Dragon Dashboard

MSI Dragon Dashboard, System Monitor
System Monitor
MSI Dragon Dashboard, LED Wizard
LED Wizard
MSI Dragon Dashboard System, Tuner
System Tuner
237
cd/m²
275
cd/m²
255
cd/m²
244
cd/m²
270
cd/m²
259
cd/m²
243
cd/m²
238
cd/m²
262
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 275 cd/m² Average: 253.7 cd/m² Minimum: 4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 270 cd/m²
Contrast: 1038:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.33 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 3.46 | - Ø
100% sRGB (Argyll) 75% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.13
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), 1920x1080
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3, 1920x1080
MSI GS73VR 6RF
1920x1080
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292
LP173WF4-SPD1, 1920x1080
HP Omen 17-w110ng
LG Philips LGD046E, 1920x1080
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), 3840x2160
Aorus X7 v6
B173QTN01.0 (AUO1096), 2560x1440
Response Times
-112%
-10%
-96%
-116%
-116%
-18%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
28 (12, 16)
38 (12, 26)
-36%
28 (13.2, 14.8)
-0%
29 (12, 17)
-4%
37 (13, 24)
-32%
37 (13, 24)
-32%
31 (11, 20)
-11%
Response Time Black / White *
8 (5, 3)
23 (5, 18)
-188%
9.6 (5.2, 4.4)
-20%
23 (7, 16)
-188%
24 (4, 20)
-200%
24 (5, 19)
-200%
10 (3, 7)
-25%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-43%
6%
-28%
-6%
4%
-49%
Brightness
254
312
23%
315
24%
355
40%
342
35%
320
26%
312
23%
Brightness Distribution
86
91
6%
86
0%
79
-8%
87
1%
88
2%
80
-7%
Black Level *
0.26
0.5
-92%
0.308
-18%
0.39
-50%
0.31
-19%
0.25
4%
0.5
-92%
Contrast
1038
652
-37%
1095
5%
1000
-4%
1168
13%
1344
29%
686
-34%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.33
6.3
-89%
2.96
11%
5.9
-77%
4.5
-35%
3.61
-8%
7.33
-120%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.46
7.37
-113%
2.57
26%
6.17
-78%
3.48
-1%
4.78
-38%
7.6
-120%
Gamma
2.13 113%
2.37 101%
2.25 107%
2.24 107%
2.23 108%
2.32 103%
2.19 110%
CCT
7419 88%
7116 91%
7114 91%
6955 93%
6144 106%
6185 105%
9024 72%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
75
55
-27%
74.3
-1%
55
-27%
55
-27%
88
17%
55
-27%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
83
-17%
100
0%
84
-16%
84
-16%
100
0%
84
-16%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-78% / -57%
-2% / 3%
-62% / -41%
-61% / -28%
-56% / -20%
-34% / -43%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12 ms rise
↘ 16 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6262 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
DPC-Latenzen
Intel Extreme Tuning Utility
 
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus X7 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
170 Points ∼100% +21%
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292
Intel Core i7-6820HK
154 Points ∼91% +10%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
148 Points ∼87% +6%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
141 Points ∼83% +1%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
140 Points ∼82%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
134 Points ∼79% -4%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
134 Points ∼79% -4%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Aorus X7 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
807 Points ∼100% +19%
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292
Intel Core i7-6820HK
704 Points ∼87% +4%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
679 Points ∼84% 0%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
678 Points ∼84% 0%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
676 Points ∼84%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
671 Points ∼83% -1%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
656 Points ∼81% -3%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus X7 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
1.93 Points ∼100% +25%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.69 Points ∼88% +9%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.55 Points ∼80%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.5 Points ∼78% -3%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.5 Points ∼78% -3%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Aorus X7 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
8.88 Points ∼100% +20%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.47 Points ∼84% +1%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.47 Points ∼84% +1%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.41 Points ∼83% 0%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.39 Points ∼83%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7206 Points ∼100% +17%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
6145 Points ∼85%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
26510 Points ∼100% +2%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
25885 Points ∼98%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
269.16 Points ∼100% +26%
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292
Intel Core i7-6820HK
236.01 Points ∼88% +10%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
232.36 Points ∼86% +9%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
230.83 Points ∼86% +8%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
213.9 Points ∼79%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292
Intel Core i7-6820HK
37616 Points ∼100% +22%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
37205 Points ∼99% +21%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
34352 Points ∼91% +12%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
33508 Points ∼89% +9%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
30722 Points ∼82%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1178.6 ms * ∼100%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1082 ms * ∼92% +8%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1067.1 ms * ∼91% +9%
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292
Intel Core i7-6820HK
1010 ms * ∼86% +14%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
3866
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
19720
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
4720
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
4138 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
25885 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
6145 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
7.39 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
58.34 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.55 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
676 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
140 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
92.23 fps
Help
PCMark 7 - Score
Aorus X7 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK, 2700, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5946 Points ∼100% +2%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
5809 Points ∼98%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
5556 Points ∼93% -4%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
4114 Points ∼69% -29%
PCMark 8
Storage Score v2
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
5018 Points ∼100% +2%
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292
Intel Core i7-6820HK, 2700, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH
4962 Points ∼99% 0%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
4942 Points ∼98%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
4230 Points ∼84% -14%
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
5394 Points ∼100% +12%
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292
Intel Core i7-6820HK, 2700, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH
5104 Points ∼95% +6%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
4831 Points ∼90%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
4809 Points ∼89% 0%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
4774 Points ∼89% -1%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
7128 Points ∼100% +44%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
6361 Points ∼89% +29%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
5062 Points ∼71% +3%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
4933 Points ∼69%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
2303 Points ∼32% -53%
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
4833 Points ∼100% +21%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
4670 Points ∼97% +17%
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292
Intel Core i7-6820HK, 2700, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH
4214 Points ∼87% +6%
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292
Intel Core i7-6820HK, 2700, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH
4214 Points ∼87% +6%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
4060 Points ∼84% +2%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
4012 Points ∼83% +1%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
3985 Points ∼82%
PCMark Vantage Result
20205 points
PCMark 7 Score
5809 points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3985 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4933 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4831 points
Help
The SSD from Toshiba uses ...
The SSD from Toshiba uses ...
... the M.2-2280 slot.
... the M.2-2280 slot.
The 1 TB HDD stems from HGST ...
The 1 TB HDD stems from HGST ...
... and rotates at 7200 rpm.
... and rotates at 7200 rpm.
CrystalDiskMark SSD
CrystalDiskMark SSD
ATTO SSD
ATTO SSD
CrystalDiskMark HDD
CrystalDiskMark HDD
HD Tune HDD
HD Tune HDD
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
MSI GS73VR 6RF
SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292
Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
Aorus X7 v6
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-86%
-18%
35%
65%
197%
Write 4k QD32
178.1
1.186
-99%
167.1
-6%
250.9
41%
295.3
66%
530.8
198%
Read 4k QD32
335.4
1.106
-100%
251.6
-25%
364.4
9%
600.2
79%
695.7
107%
Write 4k
86.83
1.146
-99%
42.51
-51%
91.39
5%
153.3
77%
155.5
79%
Read 4k
21.23
0.602
-97%
20.3
-4%
37.48
77%
42.7
101%
44.33
109%
Write 512
247.2
63.33
-74%
254.4
3%
404.2
64%
294.7
19%
1103
346%
Read 512
427.2
44.85
-90%
242.3
-43%
452.4
6%
616.2
44%
966.3
126%
Write Seq
274.6
130.6
-52%
319
16%
483.7
76%
294.9
7%
1411
414%
Read Seq
509.7
134.6
-74%
334.3
-34%
513.3
1%
1156
127%
1499
194%
Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
Sequential Read: 509.7 MB/s
Sequential Write: 274.6 MB/s
512K Read: 427.2 MB/s
512K Write: 247.2 MB/s
4K Read: 21.23 MB/s
4K Write: 86.83 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 335.4 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 178.1 MB/s
3DMark Ice Storm
3DMark Ice Storm
3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited
3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited
3DMark Ice Storm Extreme
3DMark Ice Storm Extreme
3DMark Cloud Gate
3DMark Cloud Gate
3DMark Sky Diver
3DMark Sky Diver
3DMark Time Spy
3DMark Time Spy
3DMark Fire Strike
3DMark Fire Strike
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra
3DMark 11
3DMark 11
3DMark Vantage
3DMark Vantage
3DMark 06
3DMark 06
3DMark 05
3DMark 05
3DMark 03
3DMark 03
 
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Aorus X7 v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
23591 Points ∼100% +57%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
21228 Points ∼90% +41%
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
21172 Points ∼90% +41%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
20656 Points ∼88% +38%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
15019 Points ∼64%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14904 Points ∼63% -1%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14317 Points ∼61% -5%
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Aorus X7 v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
17068 Points ∼100% +47%
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
16046 Points ∼94% +38%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
15806 Points ∼93% +36%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
15718 Points ∼92% +35%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11617 Points ∼68%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11506 Points ∼67% -1%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11311 Points ∼66% -3%
3DMark 03 Standard
87152 points
3DMark 05 Standard
23823 points
3DMark 06 Standard
25697 points
3DMark Vantage P Result
33893 points
3DMark 11 Performance
12474 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
81901 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
22892 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
9704 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
5118 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
3648 points
Help
Rise of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Aorus X7 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
97 fps ∼100% +65%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
89.7 (min: 80) fps ∼92% +53%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
85.5 fps ∼88% +45%
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
84.2 fps ∼87% +43%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
61.4 fps ∼63% +4%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
58.8 (min: 53) fps ∼61%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
Aorus X7 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
111 fps ∼100% +56%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
107.6 fps ∼97% +51%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
105.6 (min: 96) fps ∼95% +48%
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
97.1 fps ∼87% +36%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
72.4 fps ∼65% +2%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
71.3 (min: 65) fps ∼64%
Deus Ex Mankind Divided
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:2xMS AF:8x
Aorus X7 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
41.1 fps ∼100% +37%
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
37.5 fps ∼91% +25%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
30.1 (min: 23.4) fps ∼73%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
27.3 fps ∼66% -9%
1920x1080 High Preset AF:4x
Aorus X7 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
74.1 fps ∼100% +30%
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
66.7 fps ∼90% +17%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
57.1 (min: 46.3) fps ∼77%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
48.7 fps ∼66% -15%
BioShock Infinite
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
103.8 (min: 19.8) fps ∼100% +6%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
100 fps ∼96% +2%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
98.9 fps ∼95% +1%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
98 (min: 11.6) fps ∼94%
1366x768 High Preset
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
166.4 fps ∼100% +4%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
161 (min: 35.8) fps ∼97% +1%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
159.5 (min: 15) fps ∼96%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
156.9 fps ∼94% -2%
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
58 fps ∼100% +56%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
50.8 (min: 41) fps ∼88% +37%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
37.2 (min: 25) fps ∼64%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
103.8 fps ∼100% +57%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
94.8 (min: 69) fps ∼91% +43%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
66.2 (min: 39) fps ∼64%
low med. high ultra4K
BioShock Infinite (2013) 181.3175.9159.598fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 177135.966.237.224.7fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 180132.471.358.823.7fps
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 113.9100.357.130.1fps
Two small fans ...
Two small fans ...
... and a total of 6 heatpipes ...
... and a total of 6 heatpipes ...
... constitute the cooling system.
... constitute the cooling system.

Noise Level

Idle
34 / 35 / 36 dB(A)
DVD
41 / dB(A)
Load
40 / 51 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 31 dB(A)
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
MSI GS73VR 6RF
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Aorus X7 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Noise
7%
2%
0%
-1%
-2%
-3%
off / environment *
31
30.5
2%
28.4
8%
31.2
-1%
30
3%
31
-0%
30
3%
Idle Minimum *
34
31.4
8%
31.9
6%
31.2
8%
33
3%
33
3%
33
3%
Idle Average *
35
31.4
10%
32
9%
32.6
7%
34
3%
34
3%
35
-0%
Idle Maximum *
36
31.5
12%
34
6%
34.75
3%
35
3%
40
-11%
40
-11%
Load Average *
40
40.9
-2%
47
-18%
47.8
-20%
45
-13%
44
-10%
43
-8%
Load Maximum *
51
46.2
9%
49.4
3%
49.7
3%
52
-2%
50
2%
54
-6%

* ... smaller is better

Stress test: FurMark + Prime95
Stress test: FurMark + Prime95
Full load (top side; Optris PI 640)
Full load (top side; Optris PI 640)
Full load (underside; Optris PI 640)
Full load (underside; Optris PI 640)
Max. Load
 47.4 °C48.5 °C44.3 °C 
 47.6 °C48.8 °C42.4 °C 
 41.6 °C40.7 °C27.8 °C 
Maximum: 48.8 °C
Average: 43.2 °C
39.4 °C41.4 °C48.2 °C
31.7 °C37.8 °C43.4 °C
22.9 °C31.7 °C36.7 °C
Maximum: 48.2 °C
Average: 37 °C
Power Supply (max.)  44.8 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
MSI GS73VR 6RF
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Aorus X7 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Heat
-5%
-4%
-2%
1%
4%
0%
Maximum Upper Side *
48.8
53.1
-9%
50.8
-4%
53.3
-9%
45
8%
42.6
13%
47.5
3%
Maximum Bottom *
48.2
44.9
7%
60
-24%
50
-4%
54.3
-13%
44.9
7%
54.5
-13%
Idle Upper Side *
30.1
32.9
-9%
27.4
9%
30.3
-1%
29.6
2%
33.1
-10%
28.6
5%
Idle Bottom *
30.4
33.4
-10%
28.8
5%
28
8%
28.6
6%
28.9
5%
28.8
5%

* ... smaller is better

The speakers are located...
The speakers are located...
... in front part of the base unit.
... in front part of the base unit.
The subwoofer sits further back.
The subwoofer sits further back.
Software allows to adjust the sound...
Software allows to adjust the sound...
... according to your requirements.
... according to your requirements.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.437.62540.741.33138.442.94032.238.15029.139632839.88025.445.210023.9511252359.916023.959.120022.366.225022.568.731520.976.440019.478.350020.282.163019.483.180019.781.3100019.579.2125019.477.9160019.681.3200019.381250019.583.7315019.479.4400019.481.4500019.277.7630019.274.380001970.9100001977.91250018.872.91600018.670.3SPL31.692.2N1.6101median 19.4MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21median 77.9Delta0.8637.942.234.836.927.730.132.740.628.630.426.427.629.530.826.131.424.627.922.336.523.755.322.662.320.563.219.562.519.262.91967.818.668.91868.418.363.91970.518.171.118.268.818.470.618.374.718.474.518.577.818.67518.678.818.57618.665.730.8851.562.2median 18.6HP Omen 17-w110ngmedian 68.41.66.6hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 18%, worst was 34%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

HP Omen 17-w110ng audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 18%, worst was 34%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.4 / 1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 13 / 20 / 26 Watt
Load midlight 83 / 169 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Voltcraft VC 940
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
MSI GS73VR 6RF
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Aorus X7 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Power Consumption
0%
-40%
-10%
-22%
-60%
-62%
Idle Minimum *
13
15.6
-20%
22.6
-74%
14
-8%
19
-46%
25
-92%
29
-123%
Idle Average *
20
20.2
-1%
32.7
-64%
20
-0%
25
-25%
35
-75%
31
-55%
Idle Maximum *
26
21.4
18%
32.8
-26%
23.8
8%
31
-19%
46
-77%
38
-46%
Load Average *
83
90
-8%
114.7
-38%
103
-24%
90
-8%
103
-24%
111
-34%
Load Maximum *
169
147
13%
167.9
1%
212
-25%
193
-14%
223
-32%
253
-50%

* ... smaller is better

maximum battery life
maximum battery life
minimum battery life
minimum battery life
Wi-Fi battery life
Wi-Fi battery life
H.264 battery life
H.264 battery life
Charging time
Charging time
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
3h 16min
WiFi Surfing v1.3 (Edge 38.14393.0.0)
2h 22min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
2h 20min
Load (maximum brightness)
0h 40min
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
51 Wh
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
76 Wh
MSI GS73VR 6RF
65 Wh
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292
60 Wh
HP Omen 17-w110ng
95 Wh
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
88 Wh
Aorus X7 v6
94 Wh
Battery Runtime
90%
65%
-3%
112%
69%
28%
Reader / Idle
196
353
80%
353
80%
163
-17%
432
120%
278
42%
H.264
140
262
87%
233
66%
WiFi v1.3
142
250
76%
213
50%
91
-36%
247
74%
200
41%
182
28%
Load
40
87
118%
66
65%
57
43%
115
188%
89
123%

Pros

+ 美观的设计
+ 优秀的机身品质
+ 舒适的键盘,智能背光
+ 磨砂120赫兹屏幕
+ 重仅3千克
+ 6 GB显存版GeForce GTX 1060
+ 优秀的游戏性能
+ 手机用MSI Dragon Center + Dragon Dashboard软件

Cons

- SD读卡器速度慢
- 触控版较小
- 电池续航短
- 未使用NVMe固态硬盘
In review: MSI GE72VR. Test model provided by MSI Germany
In review: MSI GE72VR. Test model provided by MSI Germany

微星设计了许多高端设备。不过并不是每个人都愿意在笔记本电脑上花费超过2000欧元(约14688人民币)。GE72VR是这家生产商推出的一台中高端机型,我们的测试型号市场价约1750欧元(约12852人民币)。不过,这个型号的性价比并不算出色,因为在同价位范围内的惠普 Omen (帕萨卡)搭配了更快的GeForce GTX 1070显卡。这台17寸笔记本电脑的主要优势在于雅致纤薄的机身设计和工艺品质。同样不能不提的还有120赫兹高刷新率屏幕,尽管是TN面板,这块屏幕的实际表现十分不错。其他的特点还有背光键盘和实用的微星Dragon Center软件。

选择GE72VR的用户将拥有足够的性能享受到流畅的游戏体验。对细节的关注和丰富的功能让这台设备更加全面。另外,不少游戏玩家将会十分喜欢它的120赫兹屏幕。

除了优势之外,我们对它也有一些不满。例如,它较小的触控版让多指触控手势变得难以使用。另外,它的电池续航也有些说不过去。生产商应该考虑在未来机型中增加电池容量,让它可以适合更多用途。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 - 12/29/2016 v6
Sebastian Bade

Chassis
78 / 98 → 79%
Keyboard
81%
Pointing Device
78%
Connectivity
60 / 81 → 74%
Weight
57 / 66 → 83%
Battery
65%
Display
87%
Games Performance
92%
Application Performance
89%
Temperature
85 / 95 → 89%
Noise
69 / 90 → 77%
Audio
78%
Camera
65 / 85 → 76%
Average
76%
83%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 微星 GE72VR 6RF Apache Pro 笔记本电脑简短评测
Sebastian Bade, 2017-01-14 (Update: 2017-01-14)