联想Tab P11 Pro第二代平板电脑评测。集家庭和生产力于一身的平板电脑

Name: Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2
Brand: Lenovo

一个适合所有人的平板电脑。 明亮的OLED显示屏，对角线11.2英寸，120赫兹，四个杜比全景声扬声器，金属机身，更新至Android 14：适合家庭使用的联想Tab P11 Pro第二代推出了强大的多媒体配置，还可以用二合一键盘和手写笔等配件作为笔记本电脑的替代品。我们对它进行了测试。

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 11/28/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Tablet Touchscreen

联想Tab P11 Pro第二代为自己设定了一个雄心勃勃的目标，即吸引非常广泛的买家群体。这款11.2英寸的产品将自己定位为全能型产品，旨在实现网络冲浪、多媒体使用和游戏方面的目标。帐户管理和儿童模式也使Tab P11 Pro第二代适合家庭使用，通过对接键盘和手写笔等配件，这款平板电脑甚至可以转变为一台迷你笔记本电脑。

为了将其作为一款高效的工作平板电脑，联想在Android 12操作系统中集成了一些多任务处理功能，让人联想到Windows等操作系统。一旦可选键盘被磁力对接，平板电脑就会切换到一个特殊的桌面模式，在这种模式下，应用程序会在一个窗口中显示，而不是全屏，并且可以根据需要调整大小和位置。

Test device courtesy of Lenovo Germany

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 (Tab P Series)

Processor

MediaTek Kompanio 1300T 8 x 2 - 2.6 GHz, Cortex-A78 / A55

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G77 MP9

Memory

8 GB

, LPDDR4X

Display

11.20 inch 15:9, 2560 x 1536 pixel 266 PPI, capacitive, native pen support, OLED, 360 Hz sample rate, 600 nits peak brightness, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 100% DCI-P3, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB

, 232.8 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 DisplayPort, 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Connections: USB-C, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, exFAT support, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Hall Sensor, Vibration engine, E-Compass, Gyroscope, Coulomb Counter, WiFi Direct/Miracast, WiFi Display, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Full

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 6.8 x 263.66 x 166.67

Battery

8200 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 12

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix (f/2.4, 88° FoV, auto focus, LED flash, video recording up to 4K@30fps)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.0, 83° FOV, fixed focus, video recording up to 1080p@30fps)

Additional features

Speakers: JBL quad speakers with Dolby Atmos, Keyboard: virtual, docking keyboard optional, Charger (10V/2A), USB cable, Memory Card Tray Pin. Quick start guide, Safety & warranty information, OS-Upgrades up to Android 14, 3 years of security updates, 24 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

480 g, Power Supply: 58 g

Price

499 Euro

Links

Lenovo homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
89.2 %	11/2022	Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Kompanio 1300T, Mali-G77 MP9	480 g	6.8 mm	11.20"	2560x1536
91.7 %	03/2022	Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1, M1 8-Core GPU	461 g	6.1 mm	10.90"	2360x1640
86.2 %	01/2021	Lenovo Tab P11 Pro SD 730G, Adreno 618	485 g	5.8 mm	11.50"	2560x1600
90.2 %	06/2022	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730	507 g	6.3 mm	11.00"	2560x1600
88.7 %	11/2021	Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro SD 870, Adreno 650	515 g	6.85 mm	11.00"	2560x1600

外壳 - 高质量和轻量级的铝制底盘

联想Tab P11 Pro第二代的外壳不同于其盒子只在细节上有所不同。从视觉和触觉上看，这款11.2英寸的平板电脑是面向上流社会的对手，如 Apple iPad Air 5 2022或三星Galaxy Tab S8 5G而且在做工和缝隙尺寸方面也与它们不相上下。

6.8毫米薄的Tab P11 Pro第二代的外壳轻得令人愉快，只有480克，由铝合金制成，其双色设计让人想起了商务笔记本电脑。评测样品在受到扭转压力时有点弯曲，而且在中间也有轻微的弯曲，但证明足够结实，适合日常使用。联想没有提供关于显示玻璃的保护等级的信息。IP认证也不存在。

可选的联想Precision Pen 3手写笔以磁力方式吸附在Tab P11 Pro第二代的背面，也可以在那里充电。另一个磁性对接点是800万像素自拍镜上方的框架。底部的4个Pogo销用于连接可选的对接键盘，它也是通过磁力吸附到位的。

尺寸比较

Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Apple iPad Air 5 2022 DIN A5 ❌

设备 - Tab P11 Pro第二代的8GB内存和256GB存储空间

在审查时，联想只提供TB132FU存储版本的Tab P11 Pro Gen 2，它配备了8GB的LPDDR4x内存和256GB的UFS 3.1存储。后者可以通过平板电脑的microSD插槽进行扩展，最多可使用1TB的存储卡，也可以用exFAT文件系统进行格式化。在我们新配置的评测样品上，仍有不到233GB的内部存储空间。

用户还可以购买捆绑了手写笔和键盘的Tab P11 Pro Gen 2。这款平板电脑共有三种购买方式：

不带笔，不带键盘，354.99美元（建议零售价）
带笔，不带键盘。407.48美元（建议零售价）
带笔，带键盘。US$487.47 (RRP)

价格截止到2022年11月27日，可能会有变化。

联想平板电脑的标准功能包括蓝牙5.1，带有杜比全景声的四扬声器，支持DRM Widevine L1，以及一个USB-C端口，名义上通过USB 3.2 Gen.1传输速度达到5Gb/s。同时，它还支持Power Delivery 2.0，可以提供DisplayPort 1.4连接，这使得平板电脑可以作为笔记本的触摸显示屏使用。USB-C端口还接管了音频端口的功能。

微型SD卡读卡器

联想Tab P11 Pro第二代使用我们的Angelbird AV Pro V60 microSD参考卡实现了稳定的传输速率。然而，它们落后于前代产品，连续读取的平均速度为73MByte/s，连续写入为43.1MByte/s。

这款平板电脑的速度也比联想Tab P11 Pro在复制测试中也比联想Tab P11 Pro慢，并落后于对比设备，如三星Galaxy Tab S8 5G.

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	52.6 MB/s +188%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	24.4 MB/s +34%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	18.27 MB/s

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø41.1 (27.7-50)

Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø43.1 (27.9-59.2)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø39.2 (28.5-49.8)

Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø73 (49.1-80.3)

Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø85.8 (49-90.2)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø80.6 (46.7-90.1)

软件--账户管理、儿童模式和保修，Android 14

Android 12在该平板电脑上使用。联想承诺为该平板电脑提供三年的安全更新和两次操作系统升级，因此它应该有资格使用操作系统的下两个版本。在审查时（11月底），安全更新是从9月5日开始的，因此还没有完全达到最新水平。Android Android

联想在Android 操作系统中增加了一些应用程序。方便的是，其中没有臃肿的软件。小小的软件组合包括两个便签应用（Lenovo Instant Memo，Nebo）和计算器应用MyScript Calculator 2，它们是为Precision Pen 3量身定做的生产力工具。其他应用程序包括微软Office 365、Netflix和平板电脑中心支持应用程序，也可以用来购买延长保修期。

可以通过账户管理创建多个用户，这也使得联想平板电脑适合家庭使用。还包括 "儿童空间 "应用程序，它允许父母为他们的孩子提供适合儿童的内容。

特殊的生产力模式

与前代产品一样，当可选的键盘包连接到平板电脑时，一个特殊的用户界面被激活。所谓的 "生产力模式 "让人联想到桌面操作系统，因为所有打开的应用程序都以图标形式出现在屏幕底部的栏中。Android 图标和应用程序抽屉也显示在左边，可以用手指或手写笔轻松触及。

如果在键盘停靠时不需要生产力模式，它可以在任何时候被停用。反之，它也可以在没有对接键盘的情况下开启。

在生产力模式下，应用程序不以全屏显示，而是在自己的窗口中各自显示。这些窗口可以在桌面的任何地方移动，调整大小和最大化，最小化，并通过相应的图标关闭。虽然不是所有的应用程序都支持生产力模式，但大多数应用程序和一些游戏，如Subway Surfers，在测试中运行平稳。

打开的窗口可以使用Windows中已知的方法快速而清晰地排列。如果你把一个窗口拖到屏幕的左或右边缘，然后松开它，它就会自动调整大小，使其正好占据桌面的左或右一半。

通信和GNSS - 联想平板电脑的WiFi 6和蓝牙5.1

虽然联想也将Tab P11 Pro第二代定位为移动生产型工作平板电脑，但它并没有提供移动选项。因此，你只能在家里和外出时通过WLAN上网。

Tab P11 Pro Gen 2支持目前的WiFi无线标准，有WiFi 6。连接到我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器上，它实现了非常好的传输速率，峰值为921 MB/s。这样一来，这款平板电脑的性能明显超过了它的前辈，总体上与iPad Air 5 2022的速度差不多。 Apple iPad Air 5 2022年.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	864 (829^min - 888^max) MBit/s
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	777 (381^min - 863^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	645 (630^min - 659^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	827 (708^min - 899^max) MBit/s
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	767 (747^min - 777^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	555 (508^min - 597^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	921 (464^min - 934^max) MBit/s
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	769 (744^min - 780^max) MBit/s -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	715 (339^min - 767^max) MBit/s -22%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	959 (486^min - 977^max) MBit/s +9%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	883 (863^min - 903^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	843 (599^min - 944^max) MBit/s -5%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1802 (884^min - 1853^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1611 (1577^min - 1636^max) MBit/s

Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø903 (464-934)

Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø883 (863-903)

联想Tab P11 Pro第二代利用卫星导航系统GPS（L1，L5）和Glonass（L1）来确定其位置。在测试中，定位工作很好，在室内和室外的精确度都达到了2米。

然而，在实际使用中，GPS的准确度并不高，正如我们短途骑车所显示的那样。Tab P11 Pro第二代偶尔会记录下近10公里的路线，比Garmin Venu 2健身追踪器的精确度低得多。有时GPS把我们放在房子的墙里而不是路上，有时我们骑车穿过湖而不是过桥。尽管如此，其准确程度仍足以满足使用谷歌地图及公司的日常导航任务。

摄像头 - 1300万像素的主摄像头，图像质量尚可

联想P11 Pro第二代的相机模块包括一个1300万像素的主摄像头（f/2.4）和一个800万像素的定焦自拍摄像头（f/2.0）。

自拍相机能以每秒30帧的速度录制高达1080p的视频，覆盖83°的视野，并默认自动增亮显示屏。它在人像模式下实现了良好的虚化效果，其强度可以在5个级别中调整。如果你想在视频聊天中显得更清新，你还可以激活一个美颜滤镜。这也分5个等级，但只在第一个等级中产生有点可信的效果。

背面有一个1300万像素的摄像头，带有LED闪光灯和自动对焦功能，可以在30FPS下录制最大4K的视频，和摄像头一样，有一个不错的图像质量。与联想Tab P11 Pro前辈一样，以平板电脑的标准来看，照片是相当不错的，在良好的照明条件下，照片的清晰度和真实性令人印象深刻。然而，如果你放大图像，很快就会发现图像细节缺乏。

用主摄像头拍摄的变焦照片很模糊，在低光条件下拍摄的照片也很差。与Tab P11 Pro相比，联想已经取消了继任者背面的500万像素广角摄像头，但鉴于其相当平庸的性能，这并不是一个大的损失。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photo 1 Daylight photo 2 5x zoom Low light photo

click to load images

Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2

Canon EOS 90D

Apple iPad Pro 12.9

Xiaomi Redmi Pad

click to load images

Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2

Canon EOS 90D

Apple iPad Pro 12.9

Xiaomi Redmi Pad

click to load images

Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2

Canon EOS 90D

Apple iPad Pro 12.9

Xiaomi Redmi Pad

click to load images

Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2

Canon EOS 90D

Apple iPad Pro 12.9

Xiaomi Redmi Pad

在测试实验室，我们又仔细观察了一下主摄像头。在最佳照明条件下（最大Delta-E为10.55），ColorChecker测试图的颜色再现得相当准确，测试图显示得很清晰。然而，在1勒克斯的余光下，色彩的准确性和图像的清晰度完全下降，测试图上的任何内容都看不到了。

配件和保修 - 可延长至36个月，但需支付额外费用

联想Tab P11 Pro第二代配备了一个20瓦的电源适配器（10V/2A），一条USB-C 2.0充电线，一个用于MicroSD插槽的拆卸工具，以及一份快速启动指南。

可选的平板电脑配件包括联想Precision Pen 3和联想键盘包。，一个带触摸板的磁性二合一键盘和一个Type Cover。

联想为其平板电脑提供标准的2年保修。这可以延长到3年，但需要支付约100美元的附加费，其中还包括更好的服务，如下一个工作日的维修和延长的电话支持。

输入设备和操作 - 具有360赫兹采样率的精确的触摸屏

由于其120赫兹的屏幕，工作时的触摸采样率高达360赫兹，联想Tab P11 Pro第二代的操作非常流畅。不像Tab P11 Pro的后继者不再有指纹传感器，所以只有2D面部识别可用于生物识别认证。它的工作做得很好，但要达到较高的命中率，需要依赖足够的环境或显示屏亮度。

单独提供的联想Precision Pen 3支持4096个压力级别，有一个集成的倾斜检测，并通过蓝牙自动连接到平板电脑。键盘包也是可选的，配备有触摸板，由一个键盘和一个盖子组成，将Tab P11 Pro Gen 2变成一种迷你笔记本。

键盘的橡胶表面可以保护平板电脑，并通过4个Pogo销钉连接到其底部。盖子的背面可以调整角度，以便更好地使用，这使得平板电脑可以打开到大约135°的最大角度。

显示屏 - 亮度几乎是前代产品的两倍

联想Tab P11 Pro第二代的OLED显示屏的分辨率为2560 x 1536像素，以高达120 Hz的频率显示其15:9的图像。另外，你可以切换到60赫兹，从而从平板电脑中挤出更多的电池寿命。支持HDR10+、HLG和Dolby Vision。

Tab P11 Pro第二代的OLED屏幕的平均亮度为633 cd/m²，最大亮度为642 cd/m²（APL18测量值），比其前代产品的亮度高得多。Tab P11 Pro与同价位、同性能的同类竞争者相比，联想的平板电脑遥遥领先，其亮度超过了 Apple iPad Air 5 2022和三星Galaxy Tab S8 5G，比如说。在环境光传感器停用的情况下，这款平板电脑实现了472cd/m²的最大亮度。在最低亮度水平，它仍然保持相对明亮的5.52 cd/m²。

联想Tab P11 Pro Gen 2使用永久直流调光来控制显示屏亮度。在我们测量的所有亮度水平中，都是恒定的120赫兹，这与刷新率完全对应。由于这种均匀性和整个振幅曲线非常平坦，直流调光应该不会令人讨厌，即使对于敏感的用户来说。


608 cd/m²	615 cd/m²	619 cd/m²
623 cd/m²	631 cd/m²	645 cd/m²
646 cd/m²	645 cd/m²	669 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 669 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 633.4 cd/m² Minimum: 5.52 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 631 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
97.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23

	Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 OLED, 2560x1536, 11.20	Apple iPad Air 5 2022 IPS, 2360x1640, 10.90	Lenovo Tab P11 Pro OLED, 2560x1600, 11.50	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G LCD, 2560x1600, 11.00	Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro IPS, 2560x1600, 11.00
Screen		6%	-15%	3%	2%
Brightness middle	631	529 -16%	372 -41%	551 -13%	497 -21%
Brightness	633	490 -23%	375 -41%	536 -15%	475 -25%
Brightness Distribution	91	86 -5%	95 4%	93 2%	89 -2%
Black Level *		0.37		0.6	0.42
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.7	1.35 21%	1.8 -6%	1.4 18%	1.4 18%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.2	2.45 42%	4.2 -0%	5.6 -33%	3 29%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.6	2.1 19%	2.8 -8%	1.1 58%	2.3 12%
Gamma	2.23 ^99%	2.183 ^101%	2.29 ^96%	2.15 ^102%	2.25 ^98%
CCT	6496 ^100%	6939 ^94%	6718 ^97%	6621 ^98%	6744 ^96%
Contrast		1430		918	1183

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

120 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

在固定的变焦水平和不同的亮度设置下进行的一系列测量

为了调整图像参数，你可以从标准、自然和明亮三种颜色模式中选择。同时，色温可以通过三种预设（标准、温暖和寒冷）或通过色轮手动设置。

如果你把色彩模式和色温放在标准状态，联想Tab P11 Pro第二代会提供最佳的色彩再现。然后，该平板电脑会非常忠实地再现颜色和灰度。伽玛曲线和RGB平衡也堪称典范。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
9.54 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 8.316 ms rise
9.54 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.22 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
6.57 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.712 ms rise
6.57 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.857 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

由于其视角稳定的OLED面板，这款联想平板电脑可以在户外很好地使用。在温和的深秋阳光下，我们从显示屏上阅读内容没有问题。然而，在夏天或非常明亮的日子里，这可能是困难的，因为亮度储备不太可能是足够的。但如果你找一个阴凉的地方，应该不会有任何显示问题。

性能 - 联发科Kompanio 1300T提供高系统性能

联想采用了联发科Kompanio 1300T该SoC采用6纳米工艺制造，使用四个快速的ARM Cortex-A78内核和四个节能的Cortex-A55内核，在图形计算中得到9个内核的支持 Mali-G77 MC9.联发科处理器的进一步特点是WiFi 6，QHD分辨率，刷新率高达120赫兹，并支持HDR10+，联想的平板电脑也充分利用了这一点。

在我们的测试中，Kompanio 1300T证明了它是速度更快的移动SoC之一。在对比设备中，小米Pad 5 Pro在性能方面最接近评测对象，但整体得分更高。

与前代产品相比，性能提高了很多。只有在AIMark的人工智能计算中，这款平板电脑才会挣扎，与之相比联想Tab P11 Pro。另一方面，许多其他移动设备，如三星Galaxy Tab S8 5G，在这个基准测试中也表现得很弱。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPad Air 5 2022	1719 Points +122%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	1226 Points +59%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro	1019 Points +32%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2	773 Points
Average MediaTek Kompanio 1300T ()	773 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1892, n=68, last 2 years)	664 Points -14%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	523 Points -32%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad Air 5 2022	7034 Points +164%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro	3317 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	3269 Points +22%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2	2669 Points
Average MediaTek Kompanio 1300T ()	2669 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8524, n=68, last 2 years)	2362 Points -12%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	1764 Points -34%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Apple iPad Air 5 2022	1040908 Points +71%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	927884 Points +53%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro	704209 Points +16%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2	607789 Points
Average MediaTek Kompanio 1300T ()	607789 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1416727, n=52, last 2 years)	453858 Points -25%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	341542 Points -44%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	13740 Points +28%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro	11694 Points +9%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2	10776 Points
Average MediaTek Kompanio 1300T ()	10776 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 17267, n=65, last 2 years)	8736 Points -19%

CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPad Air 5 2022	1266 Points +73%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	1069 Points +46%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro	780 Points +6%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2	733 Points
Average MediaTek Kompanio 1300T ()	733 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1585, n=51, last 2 years)	672 Points -8%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	6908 Points +34%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro	6139 Points +19%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2	5144 Points
Average MediaTek Kompanio 1300T ()	5144 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (444 - 8886, n=52, last 2 years)	3631 Points -29%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	3421 Points -33%
System
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	10926 Points +54%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro	10171 Points +43%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2	7100 Points
Average MediaTek Kompanio 1300T ()	7100 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	6753 Points -5%
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 14097, n=52, last 2 years)	6543 Points -8%
Memory
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro	8167 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	6940 Points +6%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2	6576 Points
Average MediaTek Kompanio 1300T ()	6576 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (916 - 8890, n=52, last 2 years)	4284 Points -35%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	4053 Points -38%
Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	18998 Points +102%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro	12118 Points +29%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2	9383 Points
Average MediaTek Kompanio 1300T ()	9383 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (580 - 31738, n=52, last 2 years)	6639 Points -29%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	3875 Points -59%
Web
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2	1598 Points
Average MediaTek Kompanio 1300T ()	1598 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	1581 Points -1%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro	1411 Points -12%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	1291 Points -19%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 1907, n=52, last 2 years)	1205 Points -25%

AImark - Score v2.x
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro	118331 Points +2173%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	34522 Points +563%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	6124 Points +18%
Average of class Tablet (4468 - 6865, n=6, last 2 years)	5427 Points +4%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2	5207 Points
Average MediaTek Kompanio 1300T ()	5207 Points 0%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022	Points -100%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 44323, n=49, last 2 years)	8899 Points +5%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2	8461 Points
Average MediaTek Kompanio 1300T ()	8461 Points 0%

VRMark - Amber Room
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2	8816 Score
Average MediaTek Kompanio 1300T ()	8816 Score 0%
Average of class Tablet (1183 - 8816, n=4, last 2 years)	3565 Score -60%

Legend

Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 MediaTek Kompanio 1300T, ARM Mali-G77 MP9, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Apple iPad Air 5 2022 Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU, 64 GB SSD

Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Qualcomm Adreno 618, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Average MediaTek Kompanio 1300T

Average of class Tablet

在GPU基准测试中，结果与合成基准测试相同。联想Tab P11 Pro第二代的速度明显比Tab P11 Pro并接近于小米Pad 5 Pro总体而言。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	4144 Points +237%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2205 Points +79%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1235 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1230 Points

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	4913 Points +292%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2287 Points +83%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1253 Points
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1228 Points -2%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	18309 Points +323%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9052 Points +109%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4333 Points
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4290 Points -1%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	637 Points -85%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	10018 Points +133%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8630 Points +101%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4298 Points
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4273 Points -1%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	736 Points -83%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10486 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10215 Points +11%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9182 Points
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	3668 Points -60%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	20770 Points +79%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	14054 Points +21%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11615 Points
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	3756 Points -68%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5552 Points +5%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5298 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3676 Points -31%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	3390 Points -36%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	3350 Points
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	2261 Points
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	2437 Points
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8945 Points +19%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8844 Points +17%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7531 Points
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	2626 Points -65%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	14871 Points +73%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10563 Points +23%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8601 Points
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	2469 Points -71%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5634 Points +7%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5247 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3735 Points -29%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	3380 Points -36%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8472 Points
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	3490 Points -59%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10759 Points
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	3526 Points -67%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4858 Points
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	3371 Points -31%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal / Overall Score
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	6745 Points +167%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2527 Points

Basemark GPU 1.2 / Vulkan Medium Native
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	39.67 fps

Basemark GPU 1.2 / Vulkan Medium Offscreen
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	45.77 fps

Basemark GPU 1.2 / OpenGL Medium Native
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	30.29 fps

Basemark GPU 1.2 / OpenGL Medium Offscreen
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	43.92 fps

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	60 fps +216%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	34 fps +79%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	21 fps +11%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	19 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.5 fps -66%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	60.9 fps +190%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	35 fps +67%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	23 fps +10%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	21 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.6 fps -69%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	60 fps +107%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	50 fps +72%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	33 fps +14%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	29 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	10 fps -66%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	149 fps +176%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	87 fps +61%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps +11%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	54 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	16 fps -70%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	60 fps +131%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	47 fps +81%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	31 fps +19%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	26 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	9.7 fps -63%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	153.5 fps +220%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	83 fps +73%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	58 fps +21%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	48 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	17 fps -65%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +6%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps +5%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	113 fps
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	60 fps -47%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	55 fps -51%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	557 fps +203%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	381 fps +107%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	229 fps +24%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	184 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	85 fps -54%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	115 fps +53%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	81 fps +8%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	75 fps
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	60 fps -20%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	25 fps -67%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	317 fps +164%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	209 fps +74%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	137 fps +14%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	42 fps -65%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	88 fps +100%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	60 fps +36%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	50 fps +14%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	16 fps -64%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	229 fps +190%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	146 fps +85%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	96 fps +22%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	79 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	30 fps -62%

在浏览器性能方面，联想平板电脑没有留下任何批评的余地，因为复杂的网站可以快速加载。然而，Tab P11 Pro第二代再次仅次于小米Pad 5 Pro在基准测试中。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 (Safari 15)	184.3 Points +184%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G (Chrome 101.0.4951.41)	121.695 Points +88%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 236, n=59, last 2 years)	84.9 Points +31%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)	80 Points +23%
Average MediaTek Kompanio 1300T ()	64.9 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	64.891 Points
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro (Chrome 89.0.4389.105)	47.58 Points -27%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 (Safari 15)	435.6 Points +221%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G (Chrome 101.0.4951.41)	231.41 Points +71%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	135.71 Points
Average MediaTek Kompanio 1300T ()	135.7 Points 0%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)	134.7 Points -1%
Average of class Tablet (57.3 - 135.7, n=5, last 2 years)	85.4 Points -37%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro (Chrome 89.0.4389.105)	84.4 Points -38%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (21 - 227, n=57, last 2 years)	85.7 Points +36%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	63 Points
Average MediaTek Kompanio 1300T ()	63 Points 0%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 (Safari 15)	254 Points +239%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G (Chrome 101.0.4951.41)	155 Points +107%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)	121 Points +61%
Average of class Tablet (34 - 342, n=42, last 2 years)	120.7 Points +61%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	75 Points
Average MediaTek Kompanio 1300T ()	75 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro (Chrome 89.0.4389.105)	67 Points -11%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 (Safari 15)	255 runs/min +421%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G (Chrome 101.0.4951.41)	116 runs/min +137%
Average of class Tablet (14.7 - 376, n=52, last 2 years)	77.2 runs/min +58%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)	68.9 runs/min +41%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	48.9 runs/min
Average MediaTek Kompanio 1300T ()	48.9 runs/min 0%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro (Chrome 89.0.4389.105)	41.4 runs/min -15%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 (Safari 15)	66974 Points +134%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G (Chrome 101.0.4951.41)	48205 Points +69%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)	30367 Points +6%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	28601 Points
Average MediaTek Kompanio 1300T ()	28601 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (2672 - 74614, n=72, last 2 years)	23028 Points -19%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro (Chrome 89.0.4389.105)	16476 Points -42%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (451 - 34733, n=59, last 2 years)	3209 ms * -114%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro (Chrome 89.0.4389.105)	2888 ms * -92%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	1502.4 ms *
Average MediaTek Kompanio 1300T ()	1502 ms * -0%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)	1447 ms * +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G (Chrome 101.0.4951.41)	864.6 ms * +42%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 (Safari 15)	499 ms * +67%

* ... smaller is better

联想平板电脑的UFS 3.1内存确保了非常短的加载时间。由于其缓慢的UFS 2.0存储，前代产品只实现了读写性能的一小部分。

	Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2	Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro	Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		-68%	-18%	-16%	-7%	-52%
Sequential Read 256KB	1851.74	486.8 -74%	1517.98 -18%	1684 -9%	1760 ?(1004 - 2037, n=87) -5%	850 ?(163 - 3414, n=68, last 2 years) -54%
Sequential Write 256KB	1408.87	192.3 -86%	1026.82 -27%	772 -45%	1134 ?(452 - 1873, n=87) -20%	532 ?(78.2 - 2528, n=68, last 2 years) -62%
Random Read 4KB	289.26	136.3 -53%	263.23 -9%	289.3 0%	281 ?(173.5 - 543, n=87) -3%	167 ?(18.4 - 451, n=68, last 2 years) -42%
Random Write 4KB	308.21	123.3 -60%	256.83 -17%	281.5 -9%	311 ?(197.5 - 499, n=88) 1%	150.8 ?(8.23 - 503, n=68, last 2 years) -51%

游戏 - 可以达到120 FPS

凭借其4个兼容杜比全景声的扬声器、反应灵敏的120赫兹屏幕和 ARM Mali-G77 MC9作为像素生成器，联想平板电脑上的游戏不仅有趣，而且还能在更高的细节水平上顺利运行。

Tab P11 Pro Gen 2能够在三个游戏中的两个中充分展示其120赫兹的屏幕。Armajet和Subway Surfers可以以几乎恒定的每秒120帧的速度进行游戏。

PUBG Mobile是我们测试的第三个游戏，也是图形要求更高的游戏，在高清/高设置下被限制在每秒30帧。但我们注意到，在这里，更高的FPS率是可能的，因为帧率在游戏中的任何一点都没有下降。事实上，在HDR/Ultra设置中，这是一个更高的级别，也可以选择为最大，40 FPS是可能的--无论什么原因--并且被平板电脑保持几乎不变。

帧率是用我们的Gamebench测试工具确定的。

Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø119.3 (115-120)

Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2; PUBG Mobile; 2.2.0: Ø29.8 (28-31)

Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2; Subway Surfers; 3.3.1: Ø118.9 (112-120)

排放 - 4个杜比全景声扬声器的环绕声

温度

在测试中，联想Tab P11 Pro第二代加热到最高39.7℃，但只是在我们将其置于满负荷状态下一小时。这也导致了轻微的节流，3DMark的Wild Life压力测试证明了这一点。总的来说，性能下降的幅度很小，在日常使用中并不明显。这款平板电脑在正常使用中最多只会变得温热，因此总是触感舒适。

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø23.5 (22.3-25.5)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø40.1 (37.3-50)

Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø25.5 (25.4-25.6)

Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø6.77 (6.59-7.45)

Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø21 (20-29.7)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø10.9 (10.2-13.4)

Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø7.36 (7.35-7.37)

Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø80.5 (68.7-109)

Max. Load

Idle


37.4 °C	39.7 °C	30.2 °C
29.9 °C	31.8 °C	31 °C
32 °C	30.5 °C	32 °C

Maximum: 39.7 °C
Average: 32.7 °C


28.9 °C	38.5 °C	35.5 °C
38.7 °C	29.2 °C	29.4 °C
28.4 °C	29.7 °C	28.7 °C

Maximum: 38.7 °C
Average: 31.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 32.9 °C | Room Temperature 21.1 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

发言人

由于有4个JBL扬声器，Tab P11 Pro Gen 2能产生良好的环绕声。中音和高音听起来非常平衡。低音在声音组合中有些丢失，但仍然比许多其他多媒体平板电脑更有存在感。

扬声器的声音特性可以在Android 设置中通过电影、音乐 和动态三个设置来调整。在默认的动态模式下，它们会自动适应正在播放的内容。

音频设备可以通过USB-C适配器或蓝牙5.1连接到平板电脑。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理--耗电的平板电脑

消耗功率

联想Tab P11 Pro第二代的8200毫安时电池可以通过附带的20瓦电源适配器进行充电。关机后，在我们的测试中，空的电池需要2:11小时才能充电到100%。不支持无线充电。

在功耗方面，Tab P11 Pro第二代只有部分令人信服。虽然它的能效明显高于，例如Apple iPad Air 5 2022但它的电池消耗速度比它的前辈和其他对比设备，如三星Galaxy Tab S8 5G.

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.13 / 0.69 Watt
Idle	3 / 4.21 / 4.3 Watt
Load	6.8 / 9.5 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 8200 mAh	Apple iPad Air 5 2022 mAh	Lenovo Tab P11 Pro 8600 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G 8000 mAh	Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 8600 mAh
Power Consumption		-43%	16%	14%	6%
Idle Minimum *	3	1.65 45%	1.55 48%	1.19 60%	1.14 62%
Idle Average *	4.21	8.1 -92%	4.91 -17%	4.38 -4%	4.3 -2%
Idle Maximum *	4.3	9.4 -119%	5.02 -17%	4.45 -3%	4.31 -0%
Load Average *	6.8	9.5 -40%	4.38 36%	7.85 -15%	8.09 -19%
Load Maximum *	9.5	10.4 -9%	6.81 28%	6.67 30%	10.32 -9%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 MediaTek Kompanio 1300T: Ø7.13 (2.56-11.6)

Apple iPad Air 5 2022 Apple M1: Ø8.5 (2.85-16.7)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1: Ø6.61 (2.12-13.6)

Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G: Ø5.35 (1.849-9.44)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 MediaTek Kompanio 1300T; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.08 (5.53-8.58)

Apple iPad Air 5 2022 Apple M1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø16 (15.7-16.2)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.97 (6.63-14.8)

Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.62 (4.02-8.98)

Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 MediaTek Kompanio 1300T; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.28 (3.15-3.53)

Apple iPad Air 5 2022 Apple M1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.12 (3.04-3.45)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.14 (2.07-3.63)

Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.934 (1.897-2.33)

电池寿命

联想Tab P11 Pro第二代有一个更小但更明亮的显示屏，比联想Tab P11 Pro但也有一个稍小的电池。再加上更高的功耗，因此在电池运行时间方面，它没有接近前代产品。

联想宣传说网络浏览的电池寿命可达9小时，而视频播放据说可以达到14小时。我们在测试中确定了类似的运行时间，刷新率固定为120赫兹。

在模拟网页浏览中，Tab P11 Pro第二代持续了9:24小时，甚至比制造商指定的时间更长，但在高清视频播放中持续了12:08小时。根据不同的测试场景，联想Tab P11 Pro的运行时间多出10%至15%。审查样本也没有机会对抗三星Galaxy Tab S8 5G和小米Pad 5 Pro这两款手机的运行时间要长得多，特别是在网上冲浪方面。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		16h 56min
WiFi Websurfing		9h 24min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		12h 08min
Load (maximum brightness)		5h 37min

	Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 8200 mAh	Apple iPad Air 5 2022 mAh	Lenovo Tab P11 Pro 8600 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G 8000 mAh	Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 8600 mAh
Battery Runtime		-6%	23%	49%	69%
Reader / Idle	1016		1641 62%	2170 114%	3013 197%
H.264	728		851 17%	831 14%	1009 39%
WiFi v1.3	564	646 15%	624 11%	966 71%	921 63%
Load	337	245 -27%	348 3%	331 -2%	255 -24%

Pros

+ 明亮的OLED显示屏，120赫兹

+ 良好的性能

+ 高质量的做工

+ Android 14的更新保证

+ 快速的WiFi 6

+ 适用于家庭

+ 4个Dolby Atmos扬声器

+ 直观的笔输入

+ 用于键盘的对接端口

Cons

- 没有移动电话的选项

- 没有IP等级

- 没有指纹传感器

- 只有键盘和笔可选

- 平均电池运行时间

对联想Tab P11 Pro第二代的评价

联想Tab P11 Pro第二代是一款非常好的Android ，以354.99美元的官方价格提供了很多价值。它在一些方面也比前代产品做得更好。

加分项包括OLED显示屏，它现在的亮度几乎是两倍，频率为120而不是只有60赫兹，更强大的杜比全景声扬声器四重奏，以及更快的SoC。另一个加分点是承诺将平板电脑更新到Android 14。

联想Tab P11 Pro第二代是一款非常好的多功能Android ，但在电池寿命方面的表现比它的前辈差。

具有类似Windows界面的生产力模式也仍然是联想平板电脑的一个优点。多任务处理相当容易，即使没有可选的配件，尽管用手指最小化和最大化图标，或使窗口变大或变小有时有点麻烦。

如果你真的想在生产力模式下顺利工作，你应该购买对接键盘，最好还有数字输入笔，这样购买价格也会相应提高。

Tab P11 Pro第二代并不优于笔记本P11 Pro在每一个方面都要好。例如，仍然没有移动电话的选项，这不必要地减少了其应用范围。此外，与11.5英寸的前代产品相比，电池寿命甚至略有恶化，这可能是由于更小的电池、更亮的显示屏和改用更快的SoC的组合。

联想Tab P11 Pro第二代的替代品包括 Apple iPad Air 5 2022，以及三星Galaxy Tab S8 5G和小米Pad 5 Pro.三星和小米平板电脑还采用了120赫兹的显示屏，而Apple iPad Air 5 2022则限制在60赫兹。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

在审查时，联想Tab P11 Pro第二代在联想的官方网站，价格为354.99美元。.在英国，价格从 £396.00.其他列出该平板电脑的国家包括：法国,罗马尼亚和印度(这个名单并不详尽）。

价格截止到2022年11月26日，可能会有变化。

Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 - 2022-11-24 11/24/2022 v7
Manuel Masiero

Chassis

85 / 98 → 87%

Keyboard

74 / 80 → 93%

Pointing Device

93%

Connectivity

58 / 70 → 83%

Weight

84 / 40-88 → 91%

Battery

88%

Display

90%

Games Performance

65 / 78 → 83%

Application Performance

81 / 92 → 88%

Temperature

92%

Noise

100%

Audio

83 / 91 → 91%

Camera

54 / 85 → 64%

Average

80%

89%

Tablet - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Jacob Fisher - Translator - 897 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 388347 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 联想Tab P11 Pro第二代平板电脑评测。集家庭和生产力于一身的平板电脑

Manuel Masiero, 2022-11-28 (Update: 2022-11-28)