Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar联想 ThinkPad P16 G2 笔记本电脑评测：改进后的 165 Hz 屏幕和 Nvidia RTX 2000 Ada
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 90.2 % | 03/2024 | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE i7-13700HX, NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | 3 kg | 30.23 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 88.2 % | 02/2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB i7-12850HX, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU | 3 kg | 30.23 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 92.3 % | 09/2023 | HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | 2.6 kg | 28.5 mm | 16.00" | 3840x2400 | |
| 91.7 % | 10/2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE i9-13900H, NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 17.5 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 88.9 % | 12/2023 | HP ZBook Power 15 G10 R7 PRO 7840HS, NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | 2 kg | 22.9 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | |
| 86.2 % | 01/2024 | Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD R7 PRO 7840HS, RTX A1000 Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 24.7 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 |
外壳灰色巨型经典结构
与第一代产品相比，联想 ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 的外壳保持不变。 ThinkPad P16.这款目前最厚的 ThinkPad 笔记本电脑采用了与其他大多数机型截然不同的设计，选择了双色配色（暴风灰屏幕盖和键盘面板，黑色屏幕边框和底盖）以及不同的外形语言--底盖采用圆角设计，而不是像其他 ThinkPad 那样采用方形设计。与大多数现代 ThinkPad 不同的是，这款产品采用了经典的顶部底座铰链设计，边框相当大，尽管已经比老款 P 系列的边框要小。
在材料方面，联想 ThinkPad P16 G2 在很大程度上坚持了 ThinkPad 一贯的设计风格：金属与塑料的结合。底盖外壳采用塑料材质，并采用 ThinkPad 传统的镁合金结构框架设计--防滚架进行加固。屏幕盖是铝制的，另外还采用了镁合金加固。这款设备给人的感觉非常坚固，是目前在结构上最接近经典ThinkPad的产品。几乎没有薄弱点，机身几乎没有任何松动，唯一的例外是掌托右侧智能卡读卡器上方的掌托区域。
铰链非常完美。它们可以防止晃动，允许超过 180 度的打开角度，甚至可以单手打开屏幕。
很明显，联想 ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 是本次对比中最大、最重的工作站。规格和定位最接近的是 惠普 ZBook Fury 16 G10重量比它轻 400 克，体积和厚度也略小一些。
连接性ThinkPad P16 G2 端口丰富
端口选择和位置与前面的 联想 ThinkPad P16 G1.这两款产品的端口都非常出色，四面都有端口，并且都有传统端口和三个 USB C 端口，其中两个支持 Thunderbolt 4。我们非常怀念的是 RJ45 以太网，ThinkPad 工作站曾经拥有的功能，如 ThinkPad P15 G2和 ThinkPad P17 G2运动型 2.5 GBit 以太网。
SD 读卡器
在我们使用 AV Pro microSD 128 GB V60 参考卡进行的测试中，全尺寸 SD 读卡器的表现令人失望。传输速度一般，甚至低于平均水平。此外，SD 卡也很突出。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Average of class Workstation (54.8 - 200, n=16, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB (AV Pro V60) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Average of class Workstation (78.6 - 226, n=16, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB (AV Pro V60) | |
交流
虽然集成蓝牙 5.3 的英特尔 AX211 WiFi 网卡在下载数据时传输速度很快，但上传速度却慢得多。速度没有下降，连接非常稳定。
ThinkPad P16 G2 提供 4G/LTE 形式的 WWAN，但我们的评测设备没有配备。不过可以升级。
网络摄像头
在网络摄像头方面，ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 显然不属于最新的 ThinkPad 设计。该机型仅限于 1080p 网络摄像头。对于视频会议来说，图像效果尚可，但肯定不如一些较新笔记本电脑机型上的 500 万像素或 800 万像素摄像头。
安全
作为一款企业级设备，联想 ThinkPad P16 G2 拥有大量的安全选项。首先，它拥有专用的 TPM 2.0 安全芯片。在机身外部，有一个智能卡读卡器，这对大公司非常有用。ThinkPad 工作站有一个用于防盗的 Kensington 锁插槽、一个指纹识别器和一个红外摄像头，可通过 Windows Hello 安全登录。
配件
除了配备专有 Slim tip 插头的 170 瓦充电器外，包装盒内没有任何附件。
维护
维护方式与 ThinkPad P16 G1 基本相同：一半的内存插槽和一个固态硬盘托架位于底部小检修门的下方。其余的位于用户可更换的键盘下方，可选 WWAN 卡的开放式 M.2 插槽也位于此处。这两个步骤都很简单，现在大多数笔记本电脑都没有可拆卸键盘，即使在工作站领域也是如此。要进入冷却系统和内部电池则比较麻烦，因为必须卸下整个底盖，并用许多螺丝固定。但这也是可行的。
联想提供了一份名为《硬件维护手册》的维修手册指导用户完成维修过程。
保修
我们评测的这款联想 ThinkPad P16 G2 德国版保修期为 36 个月，包括现场服务和 Premier 支持。电池的保修期为 12 个月。在国际上，这款设备的保修期为 36 个月，但不提供现场服务，只提供上门服务。
输入设备：联想 ThinkPad 系列的传统优势
键盘
灰色的 ThinkPad 按键雕刻精致，键程为 1.5 毫米，为用户提供了绝佳的键入体验。在这款键盘上打字既精确又流畅，同时还能提供良好的阻力。按键采用蓝白色 LED 背光，亮度分为两档。
在键盘布局方面，ThinkPad P16 G2 与其他 16 英寸 ThinkPad 一样，采用了我们熟悉的布局。它的右侧有一个专用的数字键盘，这意味着整个键盘向左移动。当然，如果你需要数字键盘，这也是一种值得的牺牲。与 ThinkPad 笔记本电脑一样，键盘的布局也非常出色，F 键和专用导航键都有分组。
触摸板
光滑的塑料触摸板与之前的 ThinkPad P16 大小相同。它是一块传统的机械点击板，只能在触摸板的下半部分按压。但我们不禁要问，为什么联想认为有必要通过使用塑料表面而不是更高质量的玻璃来节省成本。当然，对于联想的目标客户来说，在如此昂贵的机器上，这不应该是一个预算问题。
除了触摸板，联想 ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 当然还配备了红色 TrackPoint 指点杆。它是 ThinkPad 品牌的主打产品，可以用来控制鼠标，工作非常精确，在某些任务中可以胜过触摸板--戴手套使用、在飞机或火车等狭小空间使用笔记本电脑以及简单的拖放操作。触摸板上方的专用扁平 TrackPoint 按钮可与指点杆配合使用，鼠标中键用于滚动。
显示屏WQXGA 屏幕现在速度更快
按照 ThinkPad 的惯例，联想为 P16 G2 提供了多种不同的屏幕选择。它们都是 16 英寸 16:10 面板：
- WUXGA（1,920 x 1,200），IPS，300 cd/m²，100 % sRGB，哑光
- WUXGA（1,920 x 1,200），IPS，400 cd/m²，100 % sRGB，哑光
- 2.5K/WQXGA (2,560 x 1,600), IPS, 500 cd/m², 100 % sRGB, 雾面, 165 Hz
- 4K/WQUXGA（3,840 x 2,400），IPS，800 cd/m²，100 % DCI-P3，雾面，HDR
- 4K/WQUXGA（3,840 x 2,400），OLED，400 cd/m²，100 % DCI-P3，半亚光，HDR，多点触控，数字转换笔
如果消费者购买了 ThinkPad P16 G2，我们评测设备上的屏幕可能会成为最受欢迎的屏幕选择--摄影师除外，他们可能需要 4K 屏幕的广色域。屏幕的亮度达到了承诺的 500 cd/m²，平均最大亮度为 510 cd/m²。这使得该屏幕甚至可以与 WQUXGA 屏幕的 惠普 ZBook Fury 16 G10.当然，它比 HP ZBook Power 15 G10 的 WQHD 显示屏亮得多。 惠普 ZBook Power 15 G10.
对于 IPS 屏幕来说，这款面板的反应速度相当快。虽然响应时间无法与 OLED 屏幕相比，但要好于许多其他 IPS 面板。当然，165 Hz 的快速刷新率也有所帮助。对于游戏和其他受益于快速刷新率的应用来说，这款屏幕无疑是可用的。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 510 cd/m²
Contrast: 1378:1 (Black: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 2.3
ΔE Greyscale 3.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
73.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
71% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.26
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE MNG007DA1-9, IPS LED, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB NE160QDM-N63 , IPS LED, 2560x1600, 16.00 | HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 AUO87A8, IPS, 3840x2400, 16.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE NE160QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | HP ZBook Power 15 G10 BOE0B6A, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60 | Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD NE160WUM-N64, IPS, 1920x1200, 16.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | 19% | -3% | -4% | -4% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 71 | 71.5 1% | 98 38% | 68.1 -4% | 68.2 -4% | 67.8 -5% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.2 | 100 1% | 99.9 1% | 97.5 -2% | 95.6 -4% | 97.7 -2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 73.2 | 73.3 0% | 86.2 18% | 70.2 -4% | 70.5 -4% | 69.8 -5% |
| Response Times | -178% | 6% | -1% | -3% | -226% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 12.8 ? | 37.7 ? -195% | 11.9 ? 7% | 13.7 ? -7% | 13 ? -2% | 50.6 ? -295% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 10.1 ? | 26.3 ? -160% | 9.6 ? 5% | 9.6 ? 5% | 10.4 ? -3% | 26 ? -157% |
| PWM Frequency | ||||||
| Screen | 9% | 14% | 25% | -17% | 6% | |
| Brightness middle | 510 | 424 -17% | 514.6 1% | 521 2% | 313.8 -38% | 355 -30% |
| Brightness | 517 | 398 -23% | 495 -4% | 484 -6% | 302 -42% | 344 -33% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 90 1% | 90 1% | 89 0% | 83 -7% | 92 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.37 | 0.24 35% | 0.46 -24% | 0.36 3% | 0.29 22% | 0.17 54% |
| Contrast | 1378 | 1767 28% | 1119 -19% | 1447 5% | 1082 -21% | 2088 52% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.6 | 2.6 -0% | 2.4 8% | 1.2 54% | 3.27 -26% | 2.9 -12% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.2 | 4.9 6% | 4.86 7% | 2.5 52% | 7.81 -50% | 5.6 -8% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.3 | 0.8 65% | 0.4 83% | 1 57% | 0.56 76% | 1 57% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.6 | 4.1 -14% | 1 72% | 1.4 61% | 5.9 -64% | 4.7 -31% |
| Gamma | 2.26 97% | 2.13 103% | 2.3 96% | 2.25 98% | 2.18 101% | 2.12 104% |
| CCT | 5969 109% | 7252 90% | 6553 99% | 6682 97% | 6323 103% | 6356 102% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -56% /
-19% | 13% /
14% | 7% /
15% | -8% /
-12% | -75% /
-29% |
* ... smaller is better
出厂时，显示器有点过热，这在卡尔曼灰度测量中最为明显。使用 X-Rite i1Pro 3 和 X-Rite i1Profiler 校准后，Colorchecker deltaE 值（描述色彩与理想值的平均偏差）从 2.6 降至 2.3。虽然差别不是很大，但还是很明显。我们创建的色彩配置文件可在上面的灰色框中免费下载。
联想称屏幕覆盖了 100% 的 sRGB 色域，我们测量的覆盖率为 99.2%。这使得该显示屏可用于简单的照片和视频编辑。
在办公室外，由于屏幕亮度高达 500 cd/m²以上，并且采用了哑光表面，因此使用起来非常方便。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 12.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 61 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 6.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
性能Raptor Lake HX 和 Ada Lovelace 构成了强大的组合
联想 ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 有大量硬件可供选择。提供五种英特尔酷睿处理器： i5 i5-13600HX和 i7-13700HX处理器 i7-13850HX，i7-13850HX，i9-13950HX i9-13950HX和 i9-13980HX.还有更多的 GPU 选项，如联想的 Nvidia RTX A1000、RTX 2000 Ada、RTX 3500 Ada、RTX 4000 Ada 和 RTX 5000 Ada。如果不需要专用 GPU，也可以购买仅配备英特尔 GPU 的 ThinkPad 笔记本电脑。
内存最高可达 192 GB DDR5-4000/3600 内存，或 128 GB ECC 内存。这要归功于四个 SO-DIMM 插槽，它们可以容纳 48 GB 的模块。在存储方面，联想就没那么慷慨了，只有两个 M.2 2280 插槽，最多可容纳 8 TB。这相当于竞争对手 惠普 ZBook Fury 16 G10的一半。
测试条件
联想使用集成的 Windows 电源设置来调节 ThinkPad 工作站的性能模式。有三种不同的模式会影响功率限制。功耗限制 1 (PL1) 描述了长期、持续的性能，而功耗限制 2 则设定了短期提升性能的边界：
- 最佳电池寿命：PL1 30 W / PL2 67 W
- 平衡：PL1 80 瓦 / PL2 100 瓦
- 最佳性能：PL1 80 瓦 / PL2 100 瓦
处理器
英特尔 英特尔酷睿 i7-13700HX是 Raptor-Lake-HX 系列的基本 i7 CPU。它结合了 8 个小 E 核心（1.5 至 3.7 GHz）和 8 个大 P 核心（2.1 至 5 GHz），由于在 P 核心上采用了超线程技术，因此共有 16 个核心和 24 个线程。该 CPU 的额定功耗通常为 55 W，与英特尔笔记本电脑 CPU 系列中最强大的 HX55 系列一样。它不支持 ECC 内存。为了与其他处理器进行基准比较，我们提供了 CPU 基准列表.
虽然联想 ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 的 CPU 性能令人印象深刻，与之前的 ThinkPad P16 G1 相比大约提高了 10%，但与 HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 的 CPU 性能相比，联想 ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 的 CPU 性能仍有差距。 惠普 ZBook Fury 16 G10在这一类别中明显胜出。不过，ZBook 的酷睿 i9 多了 8 个 E 核心，这应该是多核性能差异的原因。
在不连接充电器的情况下运行 Cinebench R23 多核测试，结果为 11318 分，性能下降了约 45%。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700HX | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
| Average of class Workstation | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (19987 - 22598, n=10) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
| Average of class Workstation (4332 - 24560, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (1666 - 1933, n=10) | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
| Average of class Workstation (1144 - 2106, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (6889 - 8610, n=10) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
| Average of class Workstation (1669 - 9329, n=29, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (644 - 740, n=10) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
| Average of class Workstation (528 - 816, n=29, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (3008 - 3482, n=11) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
| Average of class Workstation (706 - 3625, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (243 - 279, n=10) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
| Average of class Workstation (166.2 - 301, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Average of class Workstation (137 - 684, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (138 - 198, n=9) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (72220 - 89294, n=10) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
| Average of class Workstation (20087 - 99351, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (5552 - 6409, n=10) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
| Average of class Workstation (4777 - 6670, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (12389 - 15850, n=10) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
| Average of class Workstation (5022 - 17487, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (1666 - 1899, n=10) | |
| Average of class Workstation (1474 - 2095, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (19.7 - 25.5, n=10) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
| Average of class Workstation (5.09 - 26, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Average of class Workstation (36.5 - 95.2, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (36.5 - 52.9, n=10) | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Average of class Workstation (0.3876 - 0.544, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (0.4274 - 0.493, n=10) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700HX | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Average of class Workstation | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (15397 - 21999, n=10) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Average of class Workstation (2619 - 25776, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (77807 - 109364, n=10) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Average of class Workstation (12909 - 109059, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (3412 - 5053, n=10) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Average of class Workstation (824 - 4981, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (105112 - 114717, n=10) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Average of class Workstation (26716 - 131931, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (10407 - 13519, n=10) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
| Average of class Workstation (3105 - 14742, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (38311 - 53484, n=10) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Average of class Workstation (6967 - 58181, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (72510 - 182575, n=10) | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Average of class Workstation (19489 - 132156, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (981 - 1451, n=10) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
| Average of class Workstation (314 - 1472, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (8145 - 11837, n=10) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Average of class Workstation (1473 - 13800, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Average of class Workstation (18157 - 51637, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (20471 - 42415, n=10) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
系统性能
这样的系统在日常性能方面毫无弱点可言。即使在合成基准测试中稍稍落后于其他一些工作站，它也总能提供流畅的体验。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU () | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
| Average of class Workstation (5488 - 8587, n=27, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU () | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
| Average of class Workstation (9151 - 12197, n=27, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU () | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Average of class Workstation (7846 - 10820, n=27, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU () | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
| Average of class Workstation (5399 - 13947, n=27, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU () | |
| Average of class Workstation (1154 - 1972, n=27, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU () | |
| Average of class Workstation (1188 - 1842, n=27, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU () | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
| Average of class Workstation (1180 - 2248, n=27, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Average of class Workstation (990 - 1865, n=27, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU () | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU () | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
| Average of class Workstation (218 - 415, n=29, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
| Average of class Workstation (166.7 - 338, n=23, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
| Average of class Workstation (451 - 612, n=29, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU () | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 7154 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Average of class Workstation (30324 - 95718, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (36504 - 63990, n=10) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (36510 - 69729, n=10) | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
| Average of class Workstation (30787 - 85570, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
| Average of class Workstation (32728 - 93871, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (33598 - 85675, n=10) | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
| Average of class Workstation (83.4 - 139.3, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (81.9 - 97.9, n=10) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
当涉及到对 DPC 延迟敏感的工作时，系统会出现一些问题。联想可以通过驱动程序和/或 BIOS 更新随时解决这些问题。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
联想的 ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 包含一个由 SK Hynix 制造的 1 TB SSD。这是一款通过 NVMe PCIe Gen 4 连接的快速 M.2 2280 硬盘。虽然该固态硬盘在基准测试中落后于竞争对手，但差距并不大。
什么是实质性差距？只有两个 M.2 2280 插槽，其中一个出厂时是空闲的。虽然这比大多数笔记本电脑要好，但惠普的 ZBook Fury 16 G10 有四个 M.2 2280 插槽，在存储方面超过了 ThinkPad。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
撠 Nvidia RTX 2000 Ada是目前 Nvidia 面向专业市场的入门级 GPU，基于 Ada Lovelace 世代。作为一款专业芯片，该显卡专为 CAD 等任务而设计，并配有专门的 ISV 优化驱动程序。
在 ThinkPad P16 G2 中，它的功耗可高达 80 W，动态提升功耗为 20 W。这使 ThinkPad P16 超越了 ThinkPad P1 6 代因为 P1 的 GPU 功耗限制为 65 瓦，其中 15 瓦为动态提升功耗。在 3DMark 基准测试中，P16 比 P1 平均快约 27%，差距显而易见。当然，惠普 ZBook Fury 16 G10 在 GPU 性能方面远胜于其他机型，但该机型还配备了 Nvidia RTX 5000 Ada.
与处理器一样，当设备仅依靠电池运行时，GPU 性能也会被调低。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 29077 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 58198 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 22505 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 9628 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
它当然不是为游戏而生，但联想 ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 玩游戏的能力还是很强的。即使是最新的游戏也能运行，不过可能只是在高图形设置下而不是超高。老游戏也可以在内置显示屏的原生 QHD 分辨率下运行。对于 4K 游戏，GPU 还不够强大。此外，8 GB 的 VRAM 在某些情况下可能会造成障碍。
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
| Average of class Workstation (19.6 - 156.5, n=29, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 21D6001DMB A2000 Retest | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 21D6001DMB A2000 Retest | |
| Average of class Workstation (18.3 - 124.4, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
| GTA V (2015) | 176.3 | 173.4 | 163.6 | 98 | 76.8 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 424 | 291 | 184.5 | 95.6 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 188.2 | 168.7 | 160.7 | 150.2 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 199.2 | 120.3 | 84.2 | 61.3 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 156.5 | 133.5 | 103.4 | ||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 408 | 231 | 184.2 | 158.4 | 103.9 |
| F1 23 (2023) | 201 | 191.1 | 147 | 49.2 | 31.6 |
排放物：ThinkPad P16 运行温度不高，但声音很大
系统噪音
风扇的噪音特性喜忧参半。空转时，与 HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 相比，联想 ThinkPad P16 G2 的风扇开启得更快。 惠普 ZBook Fury 16 G10.在最大负载情况下，风扇的噪音比惠普大得多，最大可达 56 dB(a)。不过，在中等负载下，联想 ThinkPad 笔记本电脑比惠普更安静。因此，说联想笔记本电脑的噪音更大，并不是在任何情况下都适用的。有趣的是，惠普拥有速度更快的 RTX 5000 Ada，因此配备该芯片的 ThinkPad P16 G2 的性能可能会优于 ZBook，这要归功于风扇在最大负载下的噪音。
在我们的评测设备上，我们没有发现线圈现象。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 23.5 / 29.2 / 29.5 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 32.7 / 56.6 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.5 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-12850HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH | HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N | HP ZBook Power 15 G10 NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, R7 PRO 7840HS, WDC PC SN810 2TB | Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD RTX A1000 Laptop GPU, R7 PRO 7840HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 5% | 6% | 2% | 10% | 6% | |
| off / environment * | 23.5 | 23.2 1% | 22.9 3% | 24.5 -4% | 24.2 -3% | 24.3 -3% |
| Idle Minimum * | 23.5 | 23.2 1% | 22.9 3% | 24.5 -4% | 24.4 -4% | 24.3 -3% |
| Idle Average * | 29.2 | 23.2 21% | 22.9 22% | 24.5 16% | 24.4 16% | 24.3 17% |
| Idle Maximum * | 29.5 | 23.2 21% | 28.5 3% | 24.5 17% | 24.4 17% | 24.3 18% |
| Load Average * | 32.7 | 47.8 -46% | 40.6 -24% | 48 -47% | 27.4 16% | 35.7 -9% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 50.6 | 34.1 33% | 44.1 13% | 40.7 20% | 43.3 14% | 43.7 14% |
| Load Maximum * | 56.6 | 56.3 1% | 45.8 19% | 48 15% | 46.8 17% | 50.2 11% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
设备在空闲时保持完全冷却，但在负载情况下会产生一些热量。特别是 TrackPoint 周围和键盘中间的区域会发热。此处测得的最高温度为 47 摄氏度。尽管内部组件功能强大，但机器的其他部分大多保持凉爽。
在运行综合 CPU 和 GPU 负载的压力测试时，Nvidia GPU 没有出现任何节流现象。不过，CPU 的功耗被限制在 55 W。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.2 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 38.1 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 41.3 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.2 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.2 °C / 88.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (-3.4 °C / -6.2 F).
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB Intel Core i7-12850HX, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU | HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | HP ZBook Power 15 G10 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS, NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS, NVIDIA RTX A1000 Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 2% | -18% | -13% | -4% | -6% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 47.2 | 43.1 9% | 44.8 5% | 47.1 -0% | 42.4 10% | 40.9 13% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 39.5 | 39.9 -1% | 50 -27% | 56.5 -43% | 47.8 -21% | 57.9 -47% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 28.1 | 26 7% | 34.4 -22% | 28.1 -0% | 26.8 5% | 24.5 13% |
| Idle Bottom * | 25.3 | 27.6 -9% | 31.8 -26% | 27.6 -9% | 27.2 -8% | 25.5 -1% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
联想在键盘上方配备了上扬式立体声扬声器，可提供足够的音效，但与惠普的 ZBook Fury 16 G10 相比，音量明显不足。 ZBook Fury 16 G10.在嘈杂的环境中，ThinkPad 的表现会明显差一些。
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理：性能主力电池寿命退居其次
耗电量
与上一代 ThinkPad P16 相比，功耗略有增加。造成这种差异的原因可能是驱动程序的优化。从配置上看，两款工作站笔记本电脑非常相似。
240 瓦超薄尖头充电器足以满足约 180 瓦的最大功耗。
| Off / Standby | 0.1 / 0.7 Watt |
| Idle | 9.3 / 14.1 / 15.5 Watt |
| Load |
133.6 / 179.6 Watt |
   
| |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE i7-13700HX, NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N, IPS LED, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB i7-12850HX, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, IPS LED, 2560x1600, 16.00 | HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, IPS, 3840x2400, 16.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE i9-13900H, NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | HP ZBook Power 15 G10 R7 PRO 7840HS, NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN810 2TB, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60 | Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD R7 PRO 7840HS, RTX A1000 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, IPS, 1920x1200, 16.00 | Average NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Average of class Workstation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 28% | -37% | 13% | 30% | 47% | 12% | 9% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 9.3 | 5.1 45% | 15.3 -65% | 8.3 11% | 5.3 43% | 4.1 56% | 7.63 ? 18% | 7.82 ? 16% |
| Idle Average * | 14.1 | 9.2 35% | 18.2 -29% | 14.5 -3% | 9.9 30% | 6.5 54% | 12.8 ? 9% | 12.7 ? 10% |
| Idle Maximum * | 15.5 | 9.9 36% | 28 -81% | 15.3 1% | 16.7 -8% | 6.7 57% | 15.8 ? -2% | 18.7 ? -21% |
| Load Average * | 133.6 | 124.1 7% | 137.9 -3% | 91.8 31% | 61.3 54% | 65.2 51% | 95.6 ? 28% | 96.5 ? 28% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 144.9 | 87.7 39% | 189.4 -31% | 104.7 28% | 87.9 39% | 77.2 47% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 179.6 | 168.9 6% | 202 -12% | 164.5 8% | 145.3 19% | 147 18% | 163.1 ? 9% | 158.9 ? 12% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
尽管联想没有改变内置 94 Wh 电池的容量，但与去年相比，电池续航时间略有下降。 联想 ThinkPad P16 G1.在我们的 WiFi 测试（屏幕亮度为 150 cd/m²）中，超过 8 小时的续航时间对于这样一款功能强大的设备来说还是可以接受的。
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE i7-13700HX, NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, 94 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB i7-12850HX, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, 94 Wh | HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, 95 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE i9-13900H, NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | HP ZBook Power 15 G10 R7 PRO 7840HS, NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, 83 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD R7 PRO 7840HS, RTX A1000 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Average of class Workstation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 10% | -16% | 10% | 17% | 74% | 5% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 515 | 564 10% | 435 -16% | 567 10% | 601 17% | 897 74% | 541 ? 5% |
| Load | 106 | 67 | 68 | 81.3 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论联想 ThinkPad P16 G2 优于上一代机型
联想 ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 是 2022 年推出的改进版。 联想ThinkPad P16一代.它不仅在性能方面更快，而且在显示方面也更快，因为新机型现在采用了 165 Hz 屏幕，解决了我们对去年版本的抱怨之一。由于采用了更新的 Raptor Lake HX CPU 和 Nvidia Ada Lovelace GPU，CPU 和 GPU 的性能也得到了提升。
作为一款升级版笔记本电脑，ThinkPad P16 G2 保留了前代产品的优点，但也有不足之处。它在输入质量、坚固性、性能/散热和功能等许多方面的设计都非常出色。不过，它仍然缺少 RJ45 以太网，SD 读卡器的速度也很一般，存储扩展能力与一些竞争对手相比也很有限。此外，与同类产品相比，它的设计相当笨重。
在工作站领域，联想的 ThinkPad P16 G2 是一个非常不错的选择，尤其是在对移动性要求不高的情况下。
总的来说，联想 ThinkPad P16 G2 是工作站领域一个非常不错的选择，尤其是如果对移动性要求不高的话。最大的竞争对手之一是 惠普 ZBook Fury 16 G10它的存储能力更强，体积和重量略轻。
价格和供应情况
联想销售的 ThinkPad P16 G2 基本型号售价为 1855 美元。亚马逊销售的配置与我们测试的机型类似，售价约为 2030 美元。
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE
-
03/16/2024 v7
Benjamin Herzig
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.
Pricecompare
