Notebookcheck Logo

三星Galaxy S22+智能手机评论。Galaxy S22的大版本

更大的好处。 产品名称中的加号(+)意味着额外的功能,而三星Galaxy S22+提供了所需的功能。它提供了区别于著名的Galaxy S22的所有功能,但更进一步,特别是在显示屏和电池方面。
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

三星传统上将其在Galaxy S系列中的旗舰智能手机广泛提供,以便它们吸引尽可能多的买家。2022年也不例外。处于顶端的是6.8英寸的Galaxy S22 Ultra它在一个设备中结合了Galaxy S和Galaxy Note系列的最佳元素。三星新的S级产品中最实惠的产品还是 Galaxy S22它的6.1英寸的尺寸与iPhone 13相似。 Apple iPhone 13但使用与Galaxy S22 Ultra相同的SoC,即Exynos 2200。.

Galaxy S22+是完成当前Galaxy S阵容的第三款设备。在性能方面,由于使用了相同的SoC,它与它的两个姐妹型号处于同一水平。然而,在功能和价格方面,它更接近于Galaxy S22,而不是Galaxy S22 Ultra。

Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Galaxy S Series)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 2200 8 x 1.8 - 2.8 GHz, Exynos X2 / Cortex-A710 / A510
Graphics adapter
Memory
8192 MB 
, LPDDR5
Display
6.60 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 390 PPI, capacitive, AMOLED, FHD+, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 98.4 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Barometer, Fingerprint Sensor, Gyro Sensor, Geomagnetic Sensor, Hall Sensor, Proximity Sensor, UWB, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Full, Wi-Fi Direct, Samsung Smart Switch, Samsung DeX
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850, 900, 1.800, 1.900 MHz), 3G (B1, B2, B4, B5, B8), 4G (B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B7, B8, B12, B13, B17, B18, B19, B20, B25, B26, B28, B32, B38, B39, B40, B41, B41, B66), 5G (N1, N2, N3, N5, N7, N8, N12, N20, N25, N28, N38, N40, N41, N66, N75, N77, N78), Dual-SIM (Nano-SIM), eSIM, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.6 x 157.4 x 75.8
Battery
4500 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, OIS, FOV 85°) + 12MP Ultrawide camera (f/2.2, FOV 120°) + 10MP Telephoto camera (3x optical zoom, OIS, f/2.4, FOV 36°); videos up to [email protected]
Secondary Camera: 10 MPix f/2.2, FOV 80°
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo speakers, Keyboard: virtual, USB cable, SIM tool, Quick start guide, Warranty Information, One UI 4.1, 24 Months Warranty, fanless, waterproof
Weight
196 g
Price
1049 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
88.7 %
05/2022
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920
196 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.60"2340x1080
90.4 %
10/2021
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15, A15 GPU 5-Core
238 g128 GB NVMe6.70"2778x1284
87.9 %
04/2022
OnePlus 10 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
200.5 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"3216x1440
89 %
04/2022
Oppo Find X5 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
221 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"3216x1440
89.4 %
02/2021
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14
200 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2400x1080
87.4 %
02/2022
Xiaomi 12 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
204 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.73"3200x1440

外壳:高质量的玻璃底盘,铝制框架

Galaxy S22+整个采用无框和扁平设计,并带有圆角,使其与 Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max.除了较小的外形尺寸外, Galaxy S22使用了完全相同的外壳,获得了IP68认证。因此,这意味着该智能手机是防尘的,可以在1.5米以下的淡水中潜水30分钟而不受损害。

在正面和背面,Galaxy S22+由Gorilla Glass Victus+保护。捆绑元素是一个由装甲铝制成的框架,旨在加强智能手机的刚性,实际上使其对任何试图凹陷或扭曲它的行为都具有极大的抵抗力。总而言之,三星Galaxy S22+看起来和感觉都非常高质量。

背面最引人注目的设计元素是三摄像头,它从外壳上突出几毫米,两边被上述连接显示屏和后盖的金属框架所包围。后盖的哑光表面处理与正面的 "干净 "外观很匹配,也使智能手机相当耐指纹。

三星提供Galaxy S22+的 "幻影黑"(就像我们的评测设备)和 "幻影白"、"绿色 "和 "粉金 "的外壳颜色。此外,还有其他颜色的变体,如 "石墨"、"奶油"、"紫罗兰 "和 "天蓝",这些颜色只在三星商店里出售。

尺寸比较

163.6 mm 74.6 mm 8.66 mm 204 g163.7 mm 73.9 mm 8.5 mm 221 g163 mm 73.9 mm 8.6 mm 200.5 g161.5 mm 75.6 mm 7.8 mm 200 g160.8 mm 78.1 mm 7.7 mm 238 g157.4 mm 75.8 mm 7.6 mm 196 g

硬件:Galaxy S22+的8GB内存和高达256GB的存储。

三星提供Galaxy S22+的两个存储版本。配备8GB LPDDR5内存和128GB UFS 3.1内存的智能手机价格为749.99美元,而配备8/256GB的变体则为1079.99美元。由于缺乏microSD插槽,内部内存无法扩展。

Galaxy S22+的USB-C端口以USB 3.2 Gen.1的速度工作,在测试中实现了约300 MB/s的数据速率。它还可以用适配器作为音频端口使用。此外,USB-C端口支持USB OTB,可用于连接外围设备。

左边:没有连接
左边:没有连接
右:控制键,音量摇杆开关
右:控制键,音量摇杆开关
顶部:麦克风,显示器边缘的扬声器
顶部:麦克风,显示器边缘的扬声器
底部。双卡、麦克风、USB-C 3.1 Gen.1、扬声器
底部。双卡、麦克风、USB-C 3.1 Gen.1、扬声器

软件。操作系统更新到Android 16

Galaxy S22+运行Android 12和制造商自己的One UI 4.1界面。在测试时(4月中旬),Android 安全补丁是从4月1日开始的--没有比这更及时的了。

操作系统和预装的应用程序将我们的128GB评测设备上的自由存储空间减少到约98GB。ROM只配备了一些第三方应用程序,如Facebook和Spotify,以及少量的微软工具。除了至少可以停用的OneDrive之外,所有第三方应用程序都可以卸载。

买家特别感兴趣的是。Galaxy S22+将获得最多4个Android 操作系统升级和5年的安全补丁,因此用户很可能能够享受使用该智能手机,直到并包括Android 16。在S21系列下,用户收到的更新少了一年(企业版除外)。

通信和GNSS:UWB芯片和WiFi 6E

三星Galaxy S22+支持广泛的移动频率,包括17个5G频段,所以你应该在任何地方都有良好的接收。它在通信功能方面与Galaxy S22有两点不同,其中包括蓝牙5.2和NFC:Galaxy S22+有一个超宽带(UWB)芯片,提供WiFi 6E而不是WiFi 6。

在与我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器进行的实际Wi-Fi测试中,Galaxy S22+实现了非常高的传输速率,峰值超过1500 Mbps。在WiFi 6模式下,数据吞吐量仍然很高而且很稳定,但与WiFi 6E相比明显降低。

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1465 (1307min - 1536max) MBit/s ∼100% +77%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
944 (859min - 952max) MBit/s ∼64% +14%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
826 (765min - 881max) MBit/s ∼56%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
820 (799min - 837max) MBit/s ∼56% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72.5 - 1736, n=36, last 2 years)
704 MBit/s ∼48% -15%
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1214 (516min - 1524max) MBit/s ∼100% +35%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
899 (432min - 966max) MBit/s ∼74%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
893 (835min - 941max) MBit/s ∼74% -1%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
890 (433min - 934max) MBit/s ∼73% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78.3 - 1710, n=36, last 2 years)
716 MBit/s ∼59% -20%
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000 6GHz 6E
Average of class Smartphone
  (1346 - 1704, n=3, last 2 years)
1486 MBit/s ∼100% +10%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1346 (696min - 1430max) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000 6GHz 6E
Average of class Smartphone
  (1565 - 1751, n=3, last 2 years)
1673 MBit/s ∼100% +7%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1565 (777min - 1666max) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
875 (836min - 889max) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
747 (650min - 862max) MBit/s ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
600 (305min - 657max) MBit/s ∼69%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1395, n=234, last 2 years)
482 MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
855 (827min - 886max) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
854 (804min - 879max) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
718 (707min - 724max) MBit/s ∼84%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1348, n=234, last 2 years)
470 MBit/s ∼55%
08517025534042551059568076585093510201105119012751360144515301615Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000 6GHz 6E; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1323 (696-1430)
; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000 6GHz 6E; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1538 (777-1666)
; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø825 (765-881)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø885 (432-966)
室内的GPS信号
室内的GPS信号
室外的GPS信号
室外的GPS信号

在导航方面,Galaxy S22+使用来自GPS(B1,B5)、Glonass(B1)、北斗(B1,B2a)、伽利略(B1,B5a)和QZSS的数据。在室内,定位精度可达5米,在室外可达3米。

户外实践测试还表明,Galaxy S22+提供了准确的定位数据,非常适用于导航任务。在一次长达5公里的自行车骑行中,该智能手机对我们的定位几乎与Garmin Venu 2(用于比较的导航设备)一样精确。Galaxy S22+在密集的建筑区并不那么准确,但这在日常生活中不太可能产生影响。

GPS测试:总结
GPS测试:总结
GPS测试:环湖
GPS测试:环湖
GPS测试:转折点
GPS测试:转折点

电话功能和语音质量

Galaxy S22+提供非常好的语音质量。语音听起来很自然,即使在嘈杂的环境中也很容易理解。激活扬声器后,虽然不时有一些轻微的语音混响,但音质和可理解性仍然很稳固。

除了VoLTE之外,Galaxy S22还支持WLAN通话。第一个选项可以在连接设置中找到,而Wi-Fi通话可以在手机应用中激活。

照相机。良好的三重摄像头,带OIS

用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照

Galaxy S22+和 Galaxy S22S22+和S22共享相同的三摄像头设置,其中包括一个带有光学图像稳定器(OIS)的5000万像素广角摄像头,一个1200万像素超广角摄像头,以及一个带有OIS和3倍光学变焦的1000万像素长焦摄像头。1000万像素的前置摄像头通过一个小的圆形开口集成到显示屏上,可以进行均衡的自拍。

Galaxy S22+是适合那些不想处理光圈、曝光和白平衡等拍摄参数的用户的智能手机。在相机软件的 "专业 "模式下,你当然可以自己配置所有重要的拍摄设置。标准的 "照片 "模式可以自动选择最佳场景设置,产生几乎同样好的照片。它们以自然的色彩、高对比度和强烈的细节而令人满意。然而,作为三星的典型代表,相机软件偶尔会出现图像过饱和的情况。

夜间拍摄往往是智能手机的致命弱点。幸运的是,这并不适用于Galaxy S22+。它的主摄像头即使在低光下也能拍出相对较好和令人惊讶的细节。长焦摄像头通过3倍光学变焦拉近了与拍摄对象的距离,结合光学图像稳定技术,也能获得良好的图像。数字变焦提供高达30倍的放大率。与主摄像头和长焦摄像头相比,Galaxy S22+的超广角摄像头由于照片一般,边缘相当模糊和嘈杂而落后。

Galaxy S22+以每秒24帧的速度录制高达8K的视频。那些还想使用长焦和超广角相机拍摄的人不得不将自己限制在30帧/秒的4K视频,但这些还是以良好的图像质量作为补偿。与Galaxy S22一样,Galaxy S22+也可以用HDR10+录制视频,在每秒30帧的情况下最多可以达到4K。

用自拍相机拍照
用自拍相机拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用超广角相机拍照
用超广角相机拍照

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Tageslicht-Aufnahme 1Tageslicht-Aufnahme 25-facher ZoomUltraweitwinkelLowlight-Aufnahme
click to load images

在照片实验室,我们又仔细看了看主相机。除了一些较深的绿色和棕色的色调外,参考色被非常准确地再现出来。即使在1勒克斯的照明水平下,测试图也能完全再现,但仍然相当模糊。

ColorChecker
10.1 ∆E
5 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
1.4 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S22+: 5.74 ∆E min: 1.36 - max: 14.23 ∆E
ColorChecker
20.6 ∆E
26.6 ∆E
24.8 ∆E
26.3 ∆E
27 ∆E
38.4 ∆E
28.5 ∆E
19.7 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
23.4 ∆E
30.1 ∆E
34.3 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
29 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
22.1 ∆E
21.2 ∆E
32.1 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
25.6 ∆E
30.8 ∆E
27.9 ∆E
21.6 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S22+: 24.83 ∆E min: 12.85 - max: 38.42 ∆E

附件和保修。可选的45瓦的电源装置

从平面包装上已经可以看出,Galaxy S22+并没有配备电源装置。所包含的只是一条USB线(C型到A型),一个SIM卡工具和一份快速指南,以及包含保修信息的传单。三星在其网上商店提供可选的45瓦快速充电适配器。在那里,你还可以买到无线充电板、保护壳和耳机等物品。

三星Galaxy S22有24个月的保修期,可以通过Samsung Care+延长保修期。保险套餐延长保修期。

输入设备和操作。超声波指纹传感器和2D面部扫描

三星Galaxy S22+可以非常流畅地操作,在我们的评测中从未给人以任何任务压倒性的印象。应用程序迅速启动,在打开的应用程序之间的切换不会有任何卡顿,手指输入的处理也没有任何延迟。只有在启动智能手机时,你才需要等待一小会儿,让用户界面完成加载,但这只需要几秒钟。

对于认证,你可以使用隐藏在显示屏下的超声波指纹传感器,它可以快速可靠地解锁智能手机。第二种生物识别方法是二维人脸识别,它不像指纹传感器那样可靠,但在良好的照明条件下也能达到同样高的命中率。

横向模式下的键盘
横向模式下的键盘
纵向模式下的键盘
纵向模式下的键盘

显示屏。120 Hz AMOLED面板,1500 cd/m²

子像素
子像素

Galaxy S22+的6.6英寸AMOLED显示屏的分辨率为2340x1080,在默认设置下可在10至120赫兹范围内动态调整其刷新率。在名义上,它达到了与S22 Ultra相同的高亮度。 Galaxy S22 Ultra即高达1750尼特。在测试中,AMOLED屏幕没有达到制造商规定的1500cd/m²的规格,但仍然实现了令人印象深刻的高亮度。

在没有亮度传感器的情况下,显示屏的最大亮度为419 cd/m²,而在激活 "额外亮度 "选项后,这一亮度增加到714 cd/m²。在最低的亮度设置下,我们测量了1.69cd/m²,如果你在Android "输入帮助 "和 "可视性改进 "下的设置中打开 "额外调光",则会下降到0.33cd/m²。

在Galaxy S22+上调整亮度时,我们还观察到了典型的OLED面板的PWM闪烁现象。根据亮度水平,这在恒定的120或240赫兹下运行,因此应该很少或没有抱怨(甚至对敏感用户)。

1095
cd/m²
1085
cd/m²
1106
cd/m²
1094
cd/m²
1090
cd/m²
1107
cd/m²
1101
cd/m²
1091
cd/m²
1101
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1107 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1096.7 cd/m² Minimum: 0.33 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1090 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.5 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
98.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.04
Samsung Galaxy S22+
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.60
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
OLED, 2778x1284, 6.70
OnePlus 10 Pro
AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.70
Oppo Find X5 Pro
AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.70
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2400x1080, 6.70
Xiaomi 12 Pro
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.73
Screen
30%
17%
15%
2%
11%
Brightness middle
1090
1049
-4%
793
-27%
746
-32%
814
-25%
959
-12%
Brightness
1097
1060
-3%
776
-29%
744
-32%
814
-26%
977
-11%
Brightness Distribution
98
98
0%
95
-3%
97
-1%
97
-1%
96
-2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.5
0.78
69%
0.79
68%
0.9
64%
2
20%
1.1
56%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.8
1.72
55%
1.93
49%
1.6
58%
3.6
5%
3.1
18%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.3
0.8
65%
1.3
43%
1.6
30%
1.4
39%
1.9
17%
Gamma
2.04 108%
2.181 101%
2.223 99%
2.23 99%
2.12 104%
2.22 99%
CCT
6492 100%
6559 99%
6624 98%
6499 100%
6568 99%
6498 100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21940 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最小亮度
分钟。
25%的亮度
25%
50%的亮度
50%
75%的亮度
75%
最大的手动亮度与提升
100%

镜头下的画面是固定的放大镜和不一样的智能显示

在显示设置中,用户可以选择 "生动 "和 "自然"。Galaxy S22+在后一种设置下提供最佳的显示质量。在每种情况下,delta E值都小于3,颜色和灰度的偏差与色温和RGB平衡一样,都在理想范围内。

色彩准确性(色彩模式:自然;色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩准确性(色彩模式:自然;色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(色彩模式:自然;色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(色彩模式:自然;色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(色彩模式:自然;色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(色彩模式:自然;色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(色彩模式:自然;色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(色彩模式:自然;色彩空间:sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.153 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5785 ms rise
↘ 0.5745 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8.548 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.274 ms rise
↘ 4.274 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37 ms).

Galaxy S22+提供了一个非常适合户外使用的屏幕。即使在阳光直射下,屏幕内容仍然非常明显。在阴凉处,除了反光的显示屏外,可读性没有任何限制。

室外使用(阳光直射)。
室外使用(阳光直射)。
室外使用(在阴凉处)。
室外使用(在阴凉处)。

AMOLED面板的可视角度稳定性非常高。在平坦的视角下,亮度会有所下降,图像可能会出现轻微的绿色或蓝色变色,但这些都不值得担心。

视角
视角

性能。有改进空间的高端SoC

除了Galaxy S22+之外,还包括 Galaxy S22Galaxy S22 Ultra也使用Exynos 2200 并因此采用相同的高端SoC。这款八核处理器是目前最快的智能手机CPU之一,但仍不足以与顶级产品相比。竞争者,如 骁龙8代Apple A15 Bionic 更快。

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1742 Points ∼100% +54%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1257 Points ∼72% +11%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1211 Points ∼70% +7%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1192 Points ∼68% +5%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200
  (1133 - 1154, n=3)
1144 Points ∼66% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1133 Points ∼65%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
1100 Points ∼63% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=262, last 2 years)
653 Points ∼37% -42%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
4914 Points ∼100% +37%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3738 Points ∼76% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
3599 Points ∼73%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200
  (3474 - 3599, n=3)
3544 Points ∼72% -2%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3521 Points ∼72% -2%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3488 Points ∼71% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
3364 Points ∼68% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=262, last 2 years)
2151 Points ∼44% -40%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1011412 Points ∼100% +19%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
962824 Points ∼95% +13%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
856953 Points ∼85% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
850401 Points ∼84%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
800222 Points ∼79% -6%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200
  (704479 - 850401, n=3)
789542 Points ∼78% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (111952 - 1041980, n=102, last 2 years)
550205 Points ∼54% -35%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
14998 Points ∼100%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200
  (12579 - 14998, n=3)
13882 Points ∼93% -7%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13827 Points ∼92% -8%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13131 Points ∼88% -12%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12144 Points ∼81% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 18567, n=133, last 2 years)
10130 Points ∼68% -32%
CrossMark - Overall
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1169 Points ∼100% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1129 Points ∼97%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200
  (942 - 1129, n=3)
1009 Points ∼86% -11%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
956 Points ∼82% -15%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
811 Points ∼69% -28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (226 - 1169, n=44, last 2 years)
740 Points ∼63% -34%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
8124 Points ∼100% +13%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
7186 Points ∼88%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200
  (6319 - 7186, n=3)
6832 Points ∼84% -5%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6799 Points ∼84% -5%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6584 Points ∼81% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
6144 Points ∼76% -15%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6007 Points ∼74% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (895 - 8124, n=180, last 2 years)
4141 Points ∼51% -42%
System
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
19657 Points ∼100% +73%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
11373 Points ∼58%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200
  (10464 - 11373, n=3)
11016 Points ∼56% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
10492 Points ∼53% -8%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10340 Points ∼53% -9%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10006 Points ∼51% -12%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
9934 Points ∼51% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1542 - 19657, n=180, last 2 years)
7351 Points ∼37% -35%
Memory
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6844 Points ∼100%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6523 Points ∼95% -5%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200
  (6212 - 6844, n=3)
6490 Points ∼95% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
6246 Points ∼91% -9%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
5437 Points ∼79% -21%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
5125 Points ∼75% -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1012 - 9044, n=180, last 2 years)
4782 Points ∼70% -30%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
3612 Points ∼53% -47%
Graphics
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
25642 Points ∼100% +47%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
21944 Points ∼86% +26%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
21678 Points ∼85% +24%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
17475 Points ∼68%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200
  (17104 - 17475, n=3)
17283 Points ∼67% -1%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
15216 Points ∼59% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
14636 Points ∼57% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (478 - 25642, n=180, last 2 years)
7035 Points ∼27% -60%
Web
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
2392 Points ∼100% +22%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1960 Points ∼82%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200
  (1434 - 1960, n=3)
1773 Points ∼74% -10%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1669 Points ∼70% -15%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1527 Points ∼64% -22%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
1486 Points ∼62% -24%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1444 Points ∼60% -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (718 - 2392, n=180, last 2 years)
1373 Points ∼57% -30%
AImark - Score v2.x
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
226728 Points ∼100% +3486%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
107460 Points ∼47% +1600%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
72572 Points ∼32% +1048%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 286905, n=121, last 2 years)
63547 Points ∼28% +905%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200
  (6217 - 6487, n=3)
6342 Points ∼3% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6323 Points ∼3%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6121 Points ∼3% -3%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
5982 Points ∼3% -5%

ǞǞǞ 鹰眼920集成在三星Exynos 2200中的GPU无疑是同类产品中最快的之一,但它的处理能力并没有达到 Adreno 730 和Apple Bionic A15 GPU的处理能力。 骁龙8代1Apple A15 Bionic, 分别是。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
2817 Points ∼100% +46%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2568 Points ∼91% +33%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2523 Points ∼90% +30%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2513 Points ∼89% +30%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1935 Points ∼69%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
3080 Points ∼100% +40%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2637 Points ∼86% +20%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2609 Points ∼85% +18%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2575 Points ∼84% +17%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2202 Points ∼71%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
11688 Points ∼100% +48%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10384 Points ∼89% +32%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10282 Points ∼88% +30%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10175 Points ∼87% +29%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7890 Points ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6010 Points ∼51% -24%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10034 Points ∼100% +30%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9927 Points ∼99% +29%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9826 Points ∼98% +27%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
9680 Points ∼96% +26%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7710 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5668 Points ∼56% -26%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4150 Points ∼100% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4137 Points ∼100% +6%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3998 Points ∼96% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3909 Points ∼94%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3902 Points ∼94% 0%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
1902 Points ∼46% -51%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19283 Points ∼100% +31%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18090 Points ∼94% +23%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
16202 Points ∼84% +10%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14680 Points ∼76%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13950 Points ∼72% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10913 Points ∼57% -26%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10323 Points ∼100% +13%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10005 Points ∼97% +10%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9149 Points ∼89% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9105 Points ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8001 Points ∼78% -12%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
5782 Points ∼56% -36%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12123 Points ∼100% +8%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11411 Points ∼94% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11221 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10958 Points ∼90% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7718 Points ∼64% -31%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
25285 Points ∼100% +6%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
25242 Points ∼100% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23949 Points ∼95%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20842 Points ∼82% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9794 Points ∼39% -59%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4296 Points ∼100% +10%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4120 Points ∼96% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3923 Points ∼91%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3922 Points ∼91% 0%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
121 fps ∼100% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps ∼98% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps ∼98%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps ∼50% -50%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼50% -50%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼50% -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
425 fps ∼100% +33%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
409.6 fps ∼96% +28%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
380 fps ∼89% +19%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
368 fps ∼87% +15%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
320 fps ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
242 fps ∼57% -24%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
117 fps ∼98% -2%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps ∼50% -50%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼50% -50%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼50% -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
251 fps ∼100% +17%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
227.9 fps ∼91% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
214 fps ∼85%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
204 fps ∼81% -5%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
181 fps ∼72% -15%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
161 fps ∼64% -25%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
114 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
103 fps ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
87 fps ∼76% -24%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps ∼53% -47%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼53% -47%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps ∼49% -51%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
169 fps ∼100% +30%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
144 fps ∼85% +11%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
131 fps ∼78% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
130 fps ∼77%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
111 fps ∼66% -15%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
107 fps ∼63% -18%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
73 fps ∼100%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼82% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps ∼77% -23%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
53.2 fps ∼73% -27%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps ∼53% -47%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps ∼49% -51%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
92.9 fps ∼100% +29%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
72 fps ∼78%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps ∼76% -1%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps ∼76% -1%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps ∼68% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62 fps ∼67% -14%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps ∼100% +6%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
54.8 fps ∼96% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps ∼77% -19%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps ∼63% -33%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
27 fps ∼47% -50%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps ∼100% +39%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps ∼93% +29%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
37.9 fps ∼88% +22%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps ∼79% +10%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
27 fps ∼63% -13%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64 fps ∼96% -4%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼90% -10%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
59.1 fps ∼88% -12%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps ∼79% -21%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps ∼66% -34%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
108 fps ∼100% +80%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps ∼94% +68%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
94 fps ∼87% +57%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
92 fps ∼85% +53%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64 fps ∼59% +7%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼56%

在浏览器性能方面,三星Galaxy S22+的性能非常稳定。然而,像所有其他Android 智能手机一样,它在面对以下产品时显得力不从心Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max.

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)
181.8 Points ∼100% +69%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Chrome 100.0.4896.127)
107.364 Points ∼59%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
103 Points ∼57% -4%
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100)
101.23 Points ∼56% -6%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (96.4 - 107.4, n=3)
100.2 Points ∼55% -7%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
84.1 Points ∼46% -22%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ (Chrome 88.0.4324.152)
66.3 Points ∼36% -38%
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 182.6, n=177, last 2 years)
60 Points ∼33% -44%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)
402.9 Points ∼100% +197%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
172.8 Points ∼43% +27%
OnePlus 10 Pro
158.342 Points ∼39% +17%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (118.9 - 200, n=3)
151.5 Points ∼38% +12%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
147.5 Points ∼37% +9%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Chrome 100.0.4896.127)
135.54 Points ∼34%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ (Chrome 88.0.4324.152)
117.8 Points ∼29% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 414, n=184, last 2 years)
111.5 Points ∼28% -18%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)
242 runs/min ∼100% +130%
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100)
129.3 runs/min ∼53% +23%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (105 - 111, n=3)
108 runs/min ∼45% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Chrome 100.0.4896.127)
105 runs/min ∼43%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
104 runs/min ∼43% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ (Chrome 88.0.4324.152)
85.8 runs/min ∼35% -18%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
73.5 runs/min ∼30% -30%
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 244, n=162, last 2 years)
59.4 runs/min ∼25% -43%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)
248 Points ∼100% +62%
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100)
193 Points ∼78% +26%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Chrome 100.0.4896.127)
153 Points ∼62%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (124 - 153, n=3)
142 Points ∼57% -7%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
133 Points ∼54% -13%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
119 Points ∼48% -22%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ (Chrome 88.0.4324.152)
102 Points ∼41% -33%
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 265, n=189, last 2 years)
90 Points ∼36% -41%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)
63831 Points ∼100% +44%
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100)
49343 Points ∼77% +11%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Chrome 100.0.4896.127)
44398 Points ∼70%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (34055 - 44398, n=3)
39148 Points ∼61% -12%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
38407 Points ∼60% -13%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
29750 Points ∼47% -33%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ (Chrome 88.0.4324.152)
28247 Points ∼44% -36%
Average of class Smartphone (3526 - 65969, n=193, last 2 years)
22261 Points ∼35% -50%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 15230, n=195, last 2 years)
3271 ms * ∼100% -110%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ (Chrome 88.0.4324.152)
1744 ms * ∼53% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Chrome 100.0.4896.127)
1557.9 ms * ∼48%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (1259 - 1566, n=3)
1461 ms * ∼45% +6%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
1330 ms * ∼41% +15%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
1125 ms * ∼34% +28%
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100)
823.5 ms * ∼25% +47%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)
414.8 ms * ∼13% +73%

* ... smaller is better

UFS 3.1存储的性能处于较高的水平。除了 Oppo Find X5 Pro,它的连续读取速度并不像对比设备那样高。但这在日常生活中并不明显,因为应用程序启动非常快。

Samsung Galaxy S22+OnePlus 10 ProOppo Find X5 ProSamsung Galaxy S21+Xiaomi 12 ProAverage 128 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
1%
-23%
0%
26%
-19%
-50%
Sequential Read 256KB
1629.99
1602.12
-2%
1410
-13%
1623
0%
1620
-1%
1567 ?(1030 - 1898, n=34)
-4%
897 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=259, last 2 years)
-45%
Sequential Write 256KB
1001.67
1253.34
25%
894
-11%
1037
4%
1465
46%
752 ?(233 - 1095, n=34)
-25%
435 ?(11.9 - 1465, n=259, last 2 years)
-57%
Random Read 4KB
306.7
284.34
-7%
183.7
-40%
309.6
1%
324.9
6%
232 ?(126.2 - 322, n=34)
-24%
159.3 ?(13.5 - 325, n=259, last 2 years)
-48%
Random Write 4KB
297.67
264.45
-11%
210.4
-29%
283.3
-5%
448.9
51%
232 ?(121.4 - 323, n=34)
-22%
151.6 ?(269 - 449, n=260, last 2 years)
-49%

游戏。有很多高帧率的潜力

芯片 Exynos 2200和其 Xclipse 920GPU提供了足够的动力来顺利运行当前的游戏。然而,FPS主要取决于所玩的游戏。Galaxy S22+的AMOLED屏幕可以管理高达120 FPS,在Armajet中也能充分发挥这一优势。然而,在第二个测试游戏PUBG Mobile中,最高只能达到30 FPS,尽管还有很大的改进空间。话说回来,帧率几乎从未低于30FPS大关。

帧率是用我们的Gamebench 测试工具确定的。

氩氦刀
氩氦刀
PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø102.7 (75-120)
; PUBG Mobile; 1.9.0: Ø29.8 (26-31)

排放。薄弱的冷却使Exynos 2200的速度变慢

温度

Galaxy S22+在运行过程中最高达到35.3℃,握持时不会引起任何不适。然而,在内部,该智能手机必须通过节流来控制Exynos 2200 SoC的热量。正如3DMark的Wild Life Stress测试所显示的那样,这种情况在负载下发生得相当快。开始后不久,基准分数下降,在最坏的情况下比最佳结果低58%。

Max. Load
 34.7 °C35.2 °C32.4 °C 
 35.1 °C35.3 °C33 °C 
 34.8 °C33.4 °C31.6 °C 
Maximum: 35.3 °C
Average: 33.9 °C
31.4 °C33.7 °C33.2 °C
30.1 °C33.1 °C34.3 °C
29.8 °C31.4 °C34.4 °C
Maximum: 34.4 °C
Average: 32.4 °C
Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
80.1 (44.5min) % ∼100% +38%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69.3 (41.6min) % ∼87% +19%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65.8 (3805min) % ∼82% +13%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62.7 (37.2min) % ∼78% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58.2 (27.4min) % ∼73%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
47.2 (27.4min) % ∼59% -19%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
77 (12.3min) % ∼100% +26%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
73.1 (11.3min) % ∼95% +20%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62.7 (9.64min) % ∼81% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60.9 (8.06min) % ∼79%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
% ∼0% -100%
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø9.11 (8.06-13.3)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.1 (12.3-16)
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø31.4 (27.4-47.1)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø47 (44.5-55.5)
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø37.8 (27.4-58)
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø49.5 (34.8-61.7)

发言人

Galaxy S22+的两个扬声器可以大声播放,最高可达91.3 dB(A),即使几乎听不到低音,但总体上提供相当平衡的声音。

有线耳机或扬声器可以通过一个USB-C适配器连接。蓝牙编解码器AAC、aptX、LDAC和SBC可用于无线连接。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.434.3252836.53132.636.34027.731.2503441.3632736.58023.635.910022.338.312517.739.516016.151.620012.850.925013.156.331512604009635001167.963010.770.980010.374.3100010.977.1125012.179160011.879.620001281.5250011.881.7315011.983.3400012.980.8500013.378.6630013.472.7800013.578.61000013.671.41250014.868.91600014.164SPL24.691.3N0.686.3median 12.8median 71.4Delta1.110.634.738.935.637.933.93333.436.733.73728.930.322.925.721.532.421.441.716.248.613.850.112.253.510.754.58.658.410.461.911.962.913.365.710.266.99.269.59.269.99.771.310.770.812.669.114.267.215.358.314.663.615.767.416.571.815.86516.455.525.280.20.647.3median 13.3median 63.62.76.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy S22+Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy S22+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 19% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命。比前代略微多了一些耐力

消耗功率

Galaxy S22+在功耗方面并不显眼。然而,在负载情况下功耗明显增加,也高于对比设备的功耗。

Galaxy S22+的4500毫安时电池可以用高达45瓦的功率充电。用户必须单独购买一个匹配的电源,因为三星没有在智能手机中包含一个电源。该 Galaxy S22 Ultra提供与Galaxy S22+相同的充电功率,但有一个更大的电池(5000毫安时)。在目前Galaxy S阵容的另一端是 Galaxy S22它的容量为3700毫安时,充电功率上限为25瓦。

Galaxy S22+上支持高达15W的无线充电。通过无线电源共享功能,该智能手机还可以为其他兼容的Galaxy 设备进行无线充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.13 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.71 / 1.1 / 1.19 Watt
Load midlight 7.74 / 9.64 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Samsung Galaxy S22+
4500 mAh
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
4352 mAh
OnePlus 10 Pro
5000 mAh
Oppo Find X5 Pro
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S21+
4800 mAh
Xiaomi 12 Pro
4600 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 2200
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
10%
-8%
-8%
-3%
-3%
4%
-16%
Idle Minimum *
0.71
0.6
15%
0.7
1%
1.24
-75%
0.74
-4%
0.94
-32%
0.66 ?(0.58 - 0.71, n=3)
7%
0.915 ?(0.12 - 2.5, n=205, last 2 years)
-29%
Idle Average *
1.1
1.5
-36%
1.1
-0%
1.39
-26%
1.27
-15%
1.24
-13%
1 ?(0.71 - 1.19, n=3)
9%
1.704 ?(0.65 - 3.6, n=205, last 2 years)
-55%
Idle Maximum *
1.19
1.6
-34%
1.7
-43%
1.42
-19%
1.33
-12%
1.34
-13%
1.203 ?(1.16 - 1.26, n=3)
-1%
1.931 ?(0.69 - 4, n=205, last 2 years)
-62%
Load Average *
7.74
3.5
55%
6.4
17%
3.58
54%
6.32
18%
5.7
26%
7.26 ?(6.97 - 7.74, n=3)
6%
4.46 ?(2.1 - 7.74, n=205, last 2 years)
42%
Load Maximum *
9.64
4.8
50%
11.3
-17%
6.99
27%
9.61
-0%
8.12
16%
9.94 ?(8.85 - 11.3, n=3)
-3%
7.33 ?(3.56 - 11.9, n=205, last 2 years)
24%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Samsung Exynos 2200: Ø7.01 (1.002-15.6)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Apple A15 Bionic: Ø4.63 (0.728-10.5)
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1: Ø6.81 (1.309-12.9)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011121314Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Samsung Exynos 2200; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.3 (6.26-14.5)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Apple A15 Bionic; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.75 (8.24-9.27)
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.78 (6.94-8.13)
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Samsung Exynos 2200; Idle 1min: Ø0.814 (0.76-1.222)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Apple A15 Bionic; Idle 1min: Ø0.773 (0.705-0.881)
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Idle 1min: Ø0.977 (0.881-1.647)

电池寿命

模拟网络冲浪13小时,视频播放17小时,三星Galaxy S22+实现了良好的电池运行时间。虽然这款智能手机没有达到 Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max的水平。它击败了所有Android 比较设备和它的前辈,即Galaxy S21+(尽管这些设备的电池略大)。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
42h 55min
WiFi Websurfing
13h 08min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
17h 01min
Load (maximum brightness)
6h 04min
Samsung Galaxy S22+
4500 mAh
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
4352 mAh
OnePlus 10 Pro
5000 mAh
Oppo Find X5 Pro
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S21+
4800 mAh
Xiaomi 12 Pro
4600 mAh
Battery Runtime
30%
-15%
-10%
-14%
-14%
Reader / Idle
2575
2846
11%
1617
-37%
1269
-51%
1780
-31%
2036
-21%
H.264
1021
1522
49%
1121
10%
1142
12%
1174
15%
788
-23%
WiFi v1.3
788
1067
35%
767
-3%
788
0%
651
-17%
766
-3%
Load
364
452
24%
255
-30%
367
1%
282
-23%
337
-7%

Pros

+ 高质量的做工
+ 准确的GPS
+ 系统更新时间长
+ 良好的相机
+ 非常明亮的AMOLED显示屏
+ 系统性能高
+ 良好的电池寿命

Cons

- 负载下的节流
- 不包括电源

三星Galaxy S22+的评语

在审查中。三星Galaxy S22+。评测设备由德国三星公司提供。
在审查中。三星Galaxy S22+。评测设备由德国三星公司提供。

三星Galaxy S22+的时尚设计与S22相同。 Galaxy S22也与它较小的Galaxy S22对应的判决相同。在这里,三星再次制作了一个极其坚实的整体包装,以出色的做工、坚实的美学和强大的性能给人留下深刻印象。

与6.7英寸的 Galaxy S21+,Galaxy S22+已经变得略小,为6.6英寸。尽管电池较小,但电池运行时间却提高了10%以上。然而,前辈确实也有一个自适应120赫兹显示屏,一个体面的三摄像头,5G与双卡和eSIM以及超宽带芯片(UWB)。

三星Galaxy S22+是一款非常坚实的高端智能手机。与其强大的前辈相比,显示屏有了明显的改善。

Galaxy S22+与6.1英寸的Galaxy S22入门级机型仅在几个方面有区别,但这些对购买来说可能是决定性的。Galaxy S22+比它的姐妹机型大得多,并使用了S22 Ultra的超亮AMOLED显示屏。 Galaxy S22 Ultra.这意味着它比已经非常明亮的Galaxy S22拥有更多的亮度储备。

Galaxy S22+在通信和电池方面的装备也更好一些。它有一个UWB芯片,WiFi 6E和更高的充电速度(45瓦而不是最大25瓦),这是Galaxy S22不具备的。然而,交货时不包括电源装置。

Galaxy S22+的替代品包括更昂贵和更快的 Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max,它在设计上与三星智能手机非常相似。同样更快,但价格相似的还有 一加10 Pro小米12 Pro.

价格和可用性

在发表文章时,三星Galaxy S22+在美国亚马逊上有两种存储版本:128 GB,价格为749.99美元256 GB,售价1079.99美元。.

Samsung Galaxy S22+ - 05/09/2022 v7
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
92%
Keyboard
70 / 75 → 93%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
67 / 70 → 96%
Weight
88%
Battery
90%
Display
91%
Games Performance
57 / 64 → 90%
Application Performance
85 / 86 → 99%
Temperature
94%
Noise