三星Galaxy S22评论 - 最好的紧凑型Android 智能手机之一

Name: Samsung Galaxy S22
Brand: Samsung

小型旗舰店。 6.1英寸的三星Galaxy S22是新Galaxy S系列中最小和最实惠的型号。即便如此，它也提供了与其更昂贵的同事相同的高SoC性能，并且在功能方面几乎不相上下。此外，与它的前辈Galaxy S21相比，它有很大的改进。

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 05/04/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

三星在今年开年时推出了 Galaxy S22 Ultra 现在正在为其Galaxy S阵容做另一个补充，其中包括旗舰智能手机Galaxy S22和Galaxy 22+。我们的候选人，Galaxy S22，是最小和最便宜的型号，但与更昂贵的Galaxy S22同事共享许多功能。

通过Galaxy 22，三星进一步完善了其著名的前辈S21的成功秘诀。 Galaxy S21.重要的核心功能没有发生重大的硬件变化，而是得到了改进，如处理器、相机模块和外壳。此外，还有八种颜色的变体，并承诺将一直更新到Android 16。

Test device courtesy of Samsung Germany

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Galaxy S22 (Galaxy S Series)

Processor

Samsung Exynos 2200 8 x 1.8 - 2.8 GHz, Exynos X2 / Cortex-A710 / A510

Graphics adapter

Samsung Xclipse 920

Memory

8 GB

, LPDDR5

Display

6.10 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 422 PPI, capacitive, AMOLED, FHD+, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB

, 97.8 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Barometer, Fingerprint Sensor, Gyro Sensor, Geomagnetic Sensor, Hall Sensor, Proximity Sensor, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Full, Wi-Fi Direct, Samsung Smart Switch, Samsung DeX

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850, 900, 1.800, 1.900 MHz), 3G (B1, B2, B4, B5, B8), 4G (B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B7, B8, B12, B13, B17, B18, B19, B20, B25, B26, B28, B32, B38, B39, B41, B41, B66), 5G (N1, N2, N3, N5, N7, N8, N12, N20, N25, N28, N38, N40, N41, N66, N75, N77, N78), Dual-SIM (Nano-SIM), eSIM, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.6 x 146 x 70.6

Battery

3700 mAh Lithium-Ion

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 12

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, OIS, FOV 85°) + 12MP Ultra Wide camera (f/2.2, FOV 120°) + 10MP Telephoto camera (3x optical zoom, OIS, f/2.4, FOV 36°); videos up to 8K@24fps
Secondary Camera: 10 MPix f/2.2, FOV 80°

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo speakers, Keyboard: virtual, USB cable, SIM tool, Quick start guide, Warranty Information, One UI 4.1, 24 Months Warranty, fanless, waterproof

Weight

167 g

Price

849 Euro

Links

Samsung notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
89.3 %	05/2022	Samsung Galaxy S22 Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920	167 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.10"	2340x1080
88.7 %	10/2021	Apple iPhone 13 A15, A15 GPU 4-Core	173 g	128 GB NVMe	6.10"	2532x1170
87.4 %	12/2021	Google Pixel 6 Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20	207 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.40"	2400x1080
89.5 %	02/2021	Samsung Galaxy S21 Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14	169 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.20"	2400x1080
87.1 %	10/2021	Sony Xperia 5 III SD 888 5G, Adreno 660	168 g	128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.10"	2520x1080
87.7 %	03/2022	Xiaomi 12 SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730	179 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.28"	2400x1080

外壳 - 玻璃底盘和铝制框架

三星Galaxy S22的尺寸为6.1英寸，以今天的标准来看是一款紧凑的智能手机，甚至比其6.2英寸的前辈S21还要小。 Galaxy S21.它的外形因素与 Apple iPhone 13，但这并不是它与它的Apple 竞争对手的唯一共同点。这两款智能手机在设计上也很相似：圆角、清晰的边缘和统一的平面正面。与iPhone 13一样，也有IP68认证，用于防水和防尘。侧面看，两款智能手机的尺寸几乎相同。然而，与Apple 智能手机相比，6克的重量优势在Galaxy S22上并不明显。

三星Galaxy S22的正面和背面都有大猩猩玻璃Victus+保护，并由铠甲铝框架进一步加强。总的来说，这款三星智能手机看起来好像是由一个模具制造出来的，感觉上是高质量的。

背面最引人注目的设计元素是三组镜头。连接显示屏和后盖的金属框架也包围了相机单元，它从外壳上突出了几毫米。我们的测试设备的 "幻影黑 "的哑光表面处理与Galaxy S22的谨慎的整体外观相匹配，也使其相当防指纹。外壳颜色有 "幻影白"、"绿色 "和 "粉金"。其他颜色的变体还包括 "石墨"、"奶油"、"紫罗兰 "和 "天蓝"，这些颜色只在三星商店有售。

尺寸比较

特点 -Android 12，最多256个内存和一个快速USB-C端口

三星提供两种内存配置的Galaxy S22。8/128GB版本的官方价格为699,99美元，而256GB版本的价格也高不了多少，为849.99美元。 Android 12，以及One UI 4.1和预装的应用程序，在我们的128GB测试设备中占用了30.2GB，剩下98GB空闲。由于缺乏一个microSD插槽，内部内存无法扩展。

Galaxy S22缺少一个3.5毫米的插孔连接和一个FM收音机，以及一个UWB芯片，而Galaxy S22+和 Galaxy S22 Ultra有的。另一方面，它的USB-C端口以USB 3.2 Gen.1的速度运行，这意味着它以5GBit/s的名义速率传输数据。在实践中，数据传输率可能达到300MB/s左右。Galaxy S22可以安装两张nano SIM卡，而第二个SIM卡槽可以用eSIM卡代替。

软件 -Android 12和One UI 4.1，用于Galaxy S22。

三星Galaxy S22运行Android 12和制造商自己的One UI 4.1界面。在测试时（4月中旬），Android 安全补丁是从2022年4月1日开始的--没有比这更及时的了。

买家还可以期待长期的操作系统更新。三星承诺，Galaxy S22将收到多达四次Android 操作系统升级和五年的安全补丁，因此用户可能能够享受使用智能手机，直到并包括Android 16。在S21系列下，用户获得的时间少了一年（企业版除外）。

通信和GNSS - WiFi 6和精确的GPS

除了22个LTE频段外，三星Galaxy S22还支持17个5G频段，因此在几乎任何地方的手机接收都应该没有问题。

在WLAN方面，Galaxy S22通过WiFi 6进行通信，这意味着它有些落后于提供WiFi 6E的Galaxy S22+。在与我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器进行的实际测试中，Galaxy S22在5GHz网络中仍然实现了轻快和稳定的传输速率，在发送和接收方向上均为800Mbps左右。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	854 (763^min - 898^max) MBit/s +12%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	763 (386^min - 780^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (34.8 - 1875, n=209, last 2 years)	655 MBit/s -14%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	823 (418^min - 852^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	757 (380^min - 826^max) MBit/s -8%
Average of class Smartphone (40.5 - 1810, n=210, last 2 years)	692 MBit/s -16%
iperf3 transmit AX12
Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	833 (794^min - 859^max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	802 (421^min - 857^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S21 Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	789 (613^min - 870^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S21 Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	500 (390^min - 572^max) MBit/s
Sony Xperia 5 III Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	680 (620^min - 701^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	895 (870^min - 907^max) MBit/s
Sony Xperia 5 III Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	839 (805^min - 859^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S21 Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	778 (678^min - 837^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S21 Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	650 (249^min - 792^max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	715 (672^min - 723^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)	376 MBit/s

Samsung Galaxy S22; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø750 (386-780)

Samsung Galaxy S22; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø809 (418-852)

Galaxy S22使用来自GPS、Glonass、北斗、伽利略和QZSS各一个频段的数据来确定其位置。准确度在室内达到4米，在室外达到2米

实践测试也以优异的成绩通过。在一次10公里的自行车骑行中，Galaxy S22显示的实际位置几乎与Garmin Venu 2（用于比较的导航设备）一样精确。只有在密集的建筑区观察到较小的偏差，但这在日常生活中不太可能产生影响。

电话功能和语音质量

三星Galaxy S22的语音质量非常好。在打电话时，我们的对话伙伴的声音听起来很自然，即使有很大的背景噪音也很容易理解。激活扬声器后，虽然不时有一些轻微的语音混响，但音质仍然很好。不过，可懂度仍然很高。

除了VoLTE之外，Galaxy S22还支持WLAN通话。第一个选项可以在连接设置中找到，而WiFi通话可以在手机应用中激活。

相机 - 良好的照片，视频也可选择HDR10+。

Galaxy S22和Galaxy S22+共享相同的三摄像头，包括一个带有光学图像稳定器（OIS）的50MP广角摄像头，一个12MP超广角摄像头和一个带有OIS和3倍光学变焦的10MP长焦摄像头。1000万像素的前置摄像头通过一个小的圆形开口集成到显示屏中，可以进行均衡的自拍。

主摄像头使用像素分选将4个相邻的像素合并成一个像素，从而拍摄出12MP的照片。在良好的照明条件下，照片的细节令人印象深刻，并提供非常好的对比度。作为三星的典型，也有一个强烈的色彩方案，这当然不是为所有人服务的。根据不同的主题，这款智能手机可以在色彩方面挖掘得有点太深，使照片看起来过于饱和。由于更新了相机软件，Galaxy S22成功地拍摄了比Galaxy S21更好、更明亮的夜间照片，即使细节水平不是特别高。

超广角摄像头拍摄的照片还不错，但质量并不接近主摄像头。照片在图像边缘相当模糊，而且还伴随着图像噪音。长焦摄像头通过3倍光学变焦拉近了拍摄对象，结合光学图像稳定技术，也能拍出好照片。数字变焦提供高达30倍的放大率。

Galaxy S22可以以每秒24帧的速度录制高达8K的视频。然而，那些想使用全部相机频谱的人，必须满足于4K和30 FPS，因为只有这些模式允许在录制过程中切换镜头。尽管如此，他们以良好的图像质量作为补偿。该相机还可以用HDR10+录制视频，但这只在全高清和30帧/秒的最大范围内发挥作用。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Tageslicht-Aufnahme 1 Tageslicht-Aufnahme 2 Ultraweitwinkel 5-facher Zoom Lowlight-Aufnahme

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

在照片实验室，我们又仔细观察了一下这台相机。在最佳照明条件下，Galaxy S22总体上相当准确地再现了色彩和灰度，但一些绿色和蓝色的色调有些欠缺。另一方面，即使在几乎没有余光的情况下，它也能很好地再现测试图，但忽略了图像的清晰度。

ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S22: 5.37 ∆E min: 1.45 - max: 11.18 ∆E

配件和保修 - 不包括电源装置

在配件方面，三星很吝啬。包装中只包含一条USB线（C型到A型），一个SIM卡工具，一份快速指南和保修信息的传单。如果你没有备用的电源适配器，你可以囤积可选的25瓦快速充电适配器。在其网上商店，三星还提供无线充电垫、保护壳和耳机等。

三星Galaxy S22有24个月的保修期，可以通过Samsung Care+延长保修期。保险套餐延长保修期。

输入设备和操作 - 显示器中的超声波指纹传感器

Galaxy S22的精确触摸屏确保了非常流畅的操作，在测试中从未给人以被任何任务压倒的感觉。在三星最小的Galaxy S22机型上，手指输入的处理没有任何延迟，应用程序快速启动，在打开的应用程序之间的切换也没有任何障碍。不支持笔输入。这只适用于 Galaxy S22 Ultra在目前的Galaxy S阵容中。

你可以通过超声波指纹传感器解锁Galaxy S22，该传感器位于显示屏下方，反应非常快，识别率非常高。第二种生物识别认证方法是通过前置摄像头进行不太安全的二维面部扫描。

显示器 - 高达1300cd/m²的明亮AMOLED面板

Galaxy S22的2340 x 1080像素AMOLED显示屏以10至120赫兹的自适应刷新率工作，但也可以设置为60赫兹。据三星称，该显示屏的峰值亮度达到1300尼特，这在测试中得到证实。这使它成为最明亮的智能手机显示屏之一。Galaxy S22也有一个Always On Display，用于显示时间和通知。还可以激活一个眼睛舒适模式，减少图像的蓝色成分。

通过均匀分布的明暗图像区域，显示屏的亮度达到1296 cd/m²（APL18），或在额外亮度选项（APL50）下达到1221 cd/m²。当亮度传感器被停用时，在标准设置下，亮度下降到最大745 cd/m²，而在额外调光选项下，亮度下降到430 cd/m²。在最低亮度设置下，亮度可降至0.35cd/m²。

Galaxy S22上也出现了调整亮度时典型的OLED面板的PWM闪烁现象。然而，根据亮度水平，它以恒定的120或240赫兹运行，因此应该很少或最好没有投诉（甚至对敏感用户）。


848 cd/m²	846 cd/m²	873 cd/m²
850 cd/m²	853 cd/m²	877 cd/m²
850 cd/m²	854 cd/m²	874 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 877 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 858.3 cd/m² Minimum: 0.35 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 853 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.07

	Samsung Galaxy S22 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.10	Apple iPhone 13 OLED, 2532x1170, 6.10	Google Pixel 6 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.40	Samsung Galaxy S21 Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2400x1080, 6.20	Sony Xperia 5 III OLED, 2520x1080, 6.10	Xiaomi 12 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.28
Screen		24%	1%	-8%	-44%	-3%
Brightness middle	853	831 -3%	805 -6%	790 -7%	554 -35%	867 2%
Brightness	858	830 -3%	805 -6%	793 -8%	559 -35%	867 1%
Brightness Distribution	96	98 2%	98 2%	97 1%	95 -1%	98 2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.9	0.77 59%	1.4 26%	2.2 -16%	2.22 -17%	1.7 11%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.2	1.52 52%	3.7 -16%	4.2 -31%	5.94 -86%	4.4 -38%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.9	1.2 37%	1.8 5%	1.6 16%	3.6 -89%	1.8 5%
Gamma	2.07 ^106%	2.209 ^100%	2.29 ^96%	2.13 ^103%	2.193 ^100%	2.2 ^100%
CCT	6460 ^101%	6501 ^100%	6507 ^100%	6497 ^100%	7000 ^93%	6762 ^96%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

239.8 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 239.8 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 239.8 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17915 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

镜头下的画面是固定的放大镜和不一样的智能显示

你可以在屏幕模式中选择 "鲜艳 "和 "自然"，据此白平衡也可以在前者中调整。然而，我们在 "自然 "图像模式下得到了最好的图像质量，它几乎完全覆盖了sRGB色彩空间。色彩表现和RGB色彩平衡就会落在理想的范围内。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.275 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.644 ms rise
1.275 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.631 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8.486 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4.243 ms rise
8.486 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.243 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

在户外使用时，Galaxy S22可以充分发挥其明亮显示屏的潜力。即使在阳光直射下，屏幕内容仍然可以被很好地阅读。

显示器的视角稳定性非常好，这也是AMOLED的典型特征。在平坦的视角下，可能会出现轻微的色雾和/或亮度略有下降，但这并不影响可读性。

性能 - Exynos 2200，与竞争对手的距离可观

三星Galaxy S22使用相同的高端SoC，即 Exynos 2200，与 Galaxy S22 Ultra.这款八核处理器是目前最快的智能手机CPU之一，但并不接近竞争对手，如骁龙8代或 Apple A15 Bionic的计算能力。这在合成基准测试中很明显，特别是在安兔兔v9中，在AImark中更是如此。但是与 Galaxy S21和它的 Exynos 2100相比，这种领先只是轻微的。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 13 Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096	1755 Points +53%
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1237 Points +8%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (1133 - 1161, n=4)	1148 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	1145 Points
Sony Xperia 5 III Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	1137 Points -1%
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192	1041 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192	1003 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 2138, n=216, last 2 years)	914 Points -20%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 13 Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096	4820 Points +39%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (3474 - 3768, n=4)	3600 Points +4%
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	3581 Points +3%
Sony Xperia 5 III Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	3572 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	3474 Points
Samsung Galaxy S21 Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192	3228 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6681, n=216, last 2 years)	2997 Points -14%
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192	2805 Points -19%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	982789 Points +21%
Apple iPhone 13 Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096	813876 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	813746 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (704479 - 850401, n=4)	797881 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (102602 - 1650926, n=153, last 2 years)	738503 Points -9%
Sony Xperia 5 III Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	714551 Points -12%
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192	702981 Points -14%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Sony Xperia 5 III Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	14729 Points +5%
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	14508 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	14068 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (12579 - 14998, n=4)	13805 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (4761 - 21385, n=212, last 2 years)	11756 Points -16%
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192	10409 Points -26%

CrossMark - Overall
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1109 Points +16%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (888 - 1129, n=4)	979 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	957 Points
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192	849 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone (200 - 1474, n=164, last 2 years)	835 Points -13%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	6991 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (6319 - 7186, n=4)	6919 Points -1%
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	6860 Points -2%
Sony Xperia 5 III Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	6362 Points -9%
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192	6287 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192	6030 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=165, last 2 years)	5745 Points -18%
System
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	11210 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (10464 - 11373, n=4)	11032 Points -2%
Sony Xperia 5 III Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	10927 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192	10530 Points -6%
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	10334 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=165, last 2 years)	9678 Points -14%
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192	9085 Points -19%
Memory
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (6212 - 7614, n=4)	6771 Points +6%
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	6535 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	6413 Points
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12716, n=165, last 2 years)	6250 Points -3%
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192	6071 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192	5924 Points -8%
Sony Xperia 5 III Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	5573 Points -13%
Graphics
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	18370 Points +6%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (17104 - 17941, n=4)	17447 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	17269 Points
Sony Xperia 5 III Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	15739 Points -9%
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192	15303 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192	14636 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=165, last 2 years)	14101 Points -18%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	1924 Points
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192	1851 Points -4%
Sony Xperia 5 III Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	1827 Points -5%
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1785 Points -7%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (1434 - 1960, n=4)	1768 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=165, last 2 years)	1494 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192	1448 Points -25%

AImark - Score v2.x
Sony Xperia 5 III Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	261820 Points +3936%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192	228879 Points +3428%
Apple iPhone 13 Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096	105623 Points +1528%
Average of class Smartphone (1043 - 139804, n=50, last 2 years)	21146 Points +226%
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	6766 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	6487 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (6217 - 6487, n=3)	6342 Points -2%
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192	5723 Points -12%

在图形性能方面， Xclipse 920 GPU - 集成了三星 Exynos 2200 - 显示了与CPU基准测试类似的情况。Exynos 2200的性能比不上骁龙8代和 Apple A15 Bionic.它超过了张量 SoC的谷歌Pixel 6 和索尼Xperia 5 III 与其骁龙888在GPU基准测试中的表现，但除了相对较小的领先优势外，并没有设法获得更多东西。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2418 Points +30%
Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	2313 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1855 Points
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1823 Points -2%
Sony Xperia 5 III Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	1256 Points -32%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2586 Points +33%
Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	2470 Points +27%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2067 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1946 Points
Sony Xperia 5 III Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	1456 Points -25%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	9979 Points +34%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9782 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7458 Points
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7064 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5966 Points -20%
Sony Xperia 5 III Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	5064 Points -32%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9713 Points +38%
Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	8788 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7064 Points
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6954 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5815 Points -18%
Sony Xperia 5 III Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	5787 Points -18%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy S21 Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4668 Points +17%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4303 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4000 Points
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3643 Points -9%
Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	2307 Points -42%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	18286 Points +54%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11893 Points
Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	9878 Points -17%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8605 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7680 Points -35%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10618 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8268 Points
Samsung Galaxy S21 Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6717 Points -19%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6606 Points -20%
Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	5713 Points -31%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10206 Points
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9693 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7933 Points -22%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7344 Points -28%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	24177 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	17842 Points
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11005 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9889 Points -45%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy S21 Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4688 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4086 Points
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3754 Points -8%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3393 Points -17%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	121 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps
Sony Xperia 5 III Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	117 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	110 fps -8%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	90 fps -24%
Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	60.1 fps -49%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	428 fps +42%
Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	416.3 fps +38%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	302 fps
Sony Xperia 5 III Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	202 fps -33%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	144 fps -52%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	137 fps -55%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	121 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps
Sony Xperia 5 III Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	113 fps -5%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	79 fps -34%
Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	60.2 fps -49%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	217.4 fps +13%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	213 fps +10%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	193 fps
Samsung Galaxy S21 Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	143 fps -26%
Sony Xperia 5 III Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	129 fps -33%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	90 fps -53%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	121 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	113 fps
Samsung Galaxy S21 Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	106 fps -6%
Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	60.1 fps -47%
Sony Xperia 5 III Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	58 fps -49%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	57 fps -50%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	164 fps +33%
Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	138.6 fps +13%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	123 fps
Samsung Galaxy S21 Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	83 fps -33%
Sony Xperia 5 III Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	71 fps -42%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -51%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	81 fps +35%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps
Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	58.5 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	58 fps -3%
Sony Xperia 5 III Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	39 fps -35%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	36 fps -40%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	96.6 fps +44%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	78 fps +16%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	67 fps
Sony Xperia 5 III Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	48 fps -28%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	42 fps -37%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	40 fps -40%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	69 fps +35%
Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	54.9 fps +8%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	51 fps
Samsung Galaxy S21 Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	45 fps -12%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	40 fps -22%
Sony Xperia 5 III Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	37 fps -27%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	39 fps +34%
Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	37.2 fps +28%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	29 fps
Samsung Galaxy S21 Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	25 fps -14%
Sony Xperia 5 III Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	23 fps -21%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	23 fps -21%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	93 fps +41%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	66 fps
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	47 fps -29%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	46 fps -30%
Sony Xperia 5 III Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	45 fps -32%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	112.9 fps +69%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99 fps +48%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	67 fps
Sony Xperia 5 III Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	57 fps -15%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	49 fps -27%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	49 fps -27%

在浏览器性能方面，Galaxy S22表现非常好，但像所有其他Android 比较设备一样，它落后于 Apple iPhone 13.

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 13 (Safari 15)	180 Points +87%
Sony Xperia 5 III (Chrome93)	119.3 Points +24%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)	113.8 Points +18%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=172, last 2 years)	105.8 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)	96.4 Points
Google Pixel 6 (Chrome 96)	90.1 Points -7%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (13.8 - 107.4, n=4)	78.6 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy S21 (Chrome 88.0.4324.152)	65.1 Points -32%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 13 (Safari 15)	399.8 Points +236%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)	209.7 Points +76%
Sony Xperia 5 III (Chrome93)	209.3 Points +76%
Google Pixel 6 (Chrome 96)	180.4 Points +52%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (118.9 - 200, n=3)	151.5 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)	118.9 Points
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)	104.3 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S21 (Chrome 88.0.4324.152)	98.8 Points -17%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 13 (Safari 15)	244 runs/min +120%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (105 - 137, n=4)	115.3 runs/min +4%
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)	111 runs/min
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)	107.1 runs/min -4%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)	107 runs/min -4%
Google Pixel 6 (Chrome 96)	104 runs/min -6%
Samsung Galaxy S21 (Chrome 88.0.4324.152)	74.1 runs/min -33%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone 13 (Safari 15)	219 Points +47%
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)	149 Points
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)	148 Points -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (124 - 153, n=3)	142 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)	133.1 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S21 (Chrome 88.0.4324.152)	114 Points -23%
Google Pixel 6 (Chrome 96)	110 Points -26%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 13 (Safari 15)	62664 Points +61%
Sony Xperia 5 III (Chrome93)	45930 Points +18%
Google Pixel 6 (Chrome 96)	43376 Points +11%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (34055 - 51202, n=4)	42162 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)	38992 Points
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)	37279 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=210, last 2 years)	33573 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy S21 (Chrome 88.0.4324.152)	25656 Points -34%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Samsung Galaxy S21 (Chrome 88.0.4324.152)	1810 ms * -16%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=172, last 2 years)	1599 ms * -2%
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)	1566 ms *
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (840 - 1566, n=4)	1306 ms * +17%
Google Pixel 6 (Chrome 96)	1034 ms * +34%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)	930 ms * +41%
Sony Xperia 5 III (Chrome93)	919 ms * +41%
Apple iPhone 13 (Safari 15)	413.6 ms * +74%

* ... smaller is better

UFS 3.1的传输率处于良好的水平，但就潜在的性能而言，智能手机属于比较设备的中场。然而，在实践中，这些差异是不明显的。

	Samsung Galaxy S22	Google Pixel 6	Samsung Galaxy S21	Sony Xperia 5 III	Xiaomi 12	Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-38%	11%	-5%	39%	-8%	2%
Sequential Read 256KB	1486	1546 4%	1648 11%	1593 7%	1851 25%	1599 ?(1030 - 3134, n=56) 8%	1505 ?(226 - 4512, n=215, last 2 years) 1%
Sequential Write 256KB	993	233.4 -76%	1095 10%	740 -25%	1417 43%	777 ?(233 - 1332, n=56) -22%	1112 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=215, last 2 years) 12%
Random Read 4KB	273	126.2 -54%	309.7 13%	253.4 -7%	325.2 19%	244 ?(126.2 - 428, n=56) -11%	247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=215, last 2 years) -10%
Random Write 4KB	257.6	190.3 -26%	282.6 10%	271.3 5%	437.5 70%	245 ?(121.4 - 503, n=56) -5%	271 ?(13 - 709, n=215, last 2 years) 5%

游戏 - 有FPS限制的游戏

融合了 Exynos 2200 和 Xclipse 920GPU在游戏中提供了一个体面的提升。尽管有120赫兹的显示屏和充足的电力，但在测试游戏Armajet和PUBG Mobile中，无论我们选择何种图形设置，都不可能超过30FPS。

帧率是用我们的Gamebench 测试工具确定的。

Samsung Galaxy S22; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø29.5 (28-31)

Samsung Galaxy S22; PUBG Mobile; 1.9.0: Ø29.2 (20-31)

排放 - 负载下快速节流

温度

三星Galaxy S22在负载下最多变得温热。怠速时，表面温度远远低于30°C大关。

这款手机 Exynos 2200 只有在工作温度足够低时才能达到最大性能。然而，这不会持续很久。一旦SoC面临苛刻的任务，它的性能在很短的时间内就会大幅下降，这在3DMark Wild Life压力测试的图表中得到了很好的说明。该骁龙8代1的温度问题甚至比Exynos 2200更多，但是 Apple A15 Bionic在负载下相对稳定。

Max. Load

Idle


33.4 °C	33.2 °C	31.7 °C
33.7 °C	32.2 °C	30.9 °C
32 °C	33.2 °C	31.5 °C

Maximum: 33.7 °C
Average: 32.4 °C


31.1 °C	34.1 °C	34.2 °C
30.5 °C	33.3 °C	35 °C
29.2 °C	32.5 °C	33.2 °C

Maximum: 35 °C
Average: 32.6 °C

Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.4 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	80.1 (44.5^min) % +42%
Sony Xperia 5 III Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	63.2 (19.4^min) % +12%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	56.5 (3290^min) % 0%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	56.4 (23.6^min) %
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	53.1 (22.2^min) % -6%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	46.3 (27.5^min) % -18%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	77 (12.3^min) % +38%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	56 (6.63^min) %
Sony Xperia 5 III Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	55.2 (5.08^min) % -1%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	54.9 (7.06^min) % -2%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	% -100%

Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø7.78 (6.63-11.8)

Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.1 (12.3-16)

Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø27.2 (23.6-41.9)

Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø47 (44.5-55.5)

Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø35.6 (27.5-59.4)

发言人

Galaxy S22的扬声器位于智能手机的两端，播放声音相当响亮，总体上提供相当平衡的声音，即使在声音组合中几乎听不到低音。

那些想通过蓝牙获得声音的人必须满足于SBC、AAC、aptX和LDAC编解码。有线耳机也可以连接到S22的USB-C端口上。 Galaxy S22适配器。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Samsung Galaxy S22 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi 12 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 尽管减少了电池尺寸，但仍有坚实的平均水平

消耗功率

Galaxy S22的平均功耗为1.2瓦，在空闲模式下非常经济。然而，在负载情况下，功耗明显增加，也比对比设备的平均功耗高。

Galaxy S22的3700毫安时电池可以用高达25瓦的功率充电。然而，与其他Galaxy S型号一样，三星对配套的电源装置收取额外费用。反过来，这些设备提供更大的电池和更多的充电功率。Galaxy S22+（4500 mAh）和 Galaxy S22 Ultra(5000毫安时)可以用高达45瓦的功率充电。无线充电支持Galaxy S22的15瓦特。通过无线电源共享功能，Galaxy S22还可以为其他兼容的Galaxy 设备进行无线充电。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.02 / 0.24 Watt
Idle	0.69 / 1.19 / 1.26 Watt
Load	6.97 / 8.85 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Samsung Galaxy S22 3700 mAh	Apple iPhone 13 3240 mAh	Google Pixel 6 4614 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S21 4000 mAh	Sony Xperia 5 III 4500 mAh	Xiaomi 12 4500 mAh	Average Samsung Exynos 2200	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		15%	11%	-28%	-86%	-13%	-9%	-11%
Idle Minimum *	0.69	0.6 13%	0.68 1%	1.1 -59%	1.8 -161%	0.87 -26%	0.668 ?(0.58 - 0.71, n=4) 3%	0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years) -30%
Idle Average *	1.19	1 16%	1 16%	1.61 -35%	2.6 -118%	1.7 -43%	1.038 ?(0.71 - 1.19, n=4) 13%	1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years) -22%
Idle Maximum *	1.26	1.3 -3%	1.02 19%	1.78 -41%	3.1 -146%	1.82 -44%	1.218 ?(1.16 - 1.26, n=4) 3%	1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years) -29%
Load Average *	6.97	4.5 35%	5.39 23%	6.47 7%	5.3 24%	4.68 33%	9.43 ?(6.97 - 15.9, n=4) -35%	5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years) 20%
Load Maximum *	8.85	7.8 12%	9 -2%	10.12 -14%	11.5 -30%	7.41 16%	11.5 ?(8.85 - 16.1, n=4) -30%	8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years) 6%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200: Ø6.67 (0.973-15.2)

Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1: Ø7.17 (1.141-13.1)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.32 (5-16.8)

Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.02 (8.51-9.65)

Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.845 (0.79-1.42)

Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.18 (1.054-1.884)

电池寿命

Galaxy S22的电池寿命是坚实的平均水平。在模拟网上冲浪时，这款智能手机的续航时间略高于11小时，在视频播放时几乎为15小时。这比它的上一代产品，即 Galaxy S21尽管有更大的电池，但总体上还是差了13%。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		36h 22min
WiFi Websurfing		11h 15min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		14h 47min
Load (maximum brightness)		5h 24min

	Samsung Galaxy S22 3700 mAh	Apple iPhone 13 3240 mAh	Google Pixel 6 4614 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S21 4000 mAh	Sony Xperia 5 III 4500 mAh	Xiaomi 12 4500 mAh
Battery Runtime		27%	3%	-13%	8%	12%
Reader / Idle	2182	2734 25%	2020 -7%	1713 -21%		2558 17%
H.264	887	1224 38%	1219 37%	941 6%		890 0%
WiFi v1.3	675	1019 51%	627 -7%	544 -19%	727 8%	760 13%
Load	324	299 -8%	291 -10%	267 -18%		385 19%

Pros

+ 高质量的做工

+ 紧凑尺寸

+ 准确的 GPS

+ 更新时间长

+ 良好的相机

+ 非常明亮的AMOLED显示屏

+ 系统性能高

Cons

- 负载下的节流

- 不包括电源

- 充电时最大功率为 25 瓦

三星Galaxy S22的评语

三星通过Galaxy S22创造了一个非常好的整体包装，与Galaxy S21一样，它以出色的做工、坚实的美学和强大的性能给人留下深刻印象。

与前代产品相比，它有一些改进。例如，现在相机的夜景拍摄效果明显更好，而且现在不再是塑料背面，而是全部采用玻璃表面。电池寿命也得到了改善（尽管电池较小），120赫兹显示屏也是如此，它实现了与Galaxy S21一样好的图像显示，但在更大的范围内动态调整其帧速率，最重要的是，它的光芒更亮。

6.1英寸的三星Galaxy S22以其高质量的做工和强大的功能给人留下深刻印象。

另一个强有力的卖点是三星对Galaxy S22的更新政策，它承诺该智能手机将能够运行连续的操作系统，直至Android 16。因此，你可以在很长一段时间内不必进行新的智能手机升级。

最便宜的Galaxy S机型的新版本也没有microSD插槽、插孔和电源装置。充电功率容量也仍然限制在25瓦，这似乎不再符合时代的要求。

Galaxy S22的替代品是，例如，6.1英寸的 Apple iPhone 13，它在尺寸和设计方面也与三星非常相似。淘宝网索尼Xperia 5 III和小米12，也是紧凑型的，目前要比Galaxy S22便宜得多，而且速度也快一些。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

三星Galaxy S22可以通过美国亚马逊以各种价格购买。.配备128GB内存的变体价格为699,99美元，另一款配备256GB的变体价格为849,99美元。

Samsung Galaxy S22 - 2022-08-30 08/30/2022 v7
Manuel Masiero

Chassis

92%

Keyboard

69 / 75 → 92%

Pointing Device

93%

Connectivity

66 / 70 → 94%

Weight

91%

Battery

89%

Display

93%

Games Performance

58 / 64 → 91%

Application Performance

85 / 86 → 99%

Temperature

94%

Noise

100%

Audio

73 / 90 → 81%

Camera

79%

Average

83%

89%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Jacob Fisher - Translator - 888 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 388017 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 三星Galaxy S22评论 - 最好的紧凑型Android 智能手机之一

Manuel Masiero, 2022-05- 4 (Update: 2022-05- 4)

三星Galaxy S22评论 - 最好的紧凑型Android 智能手机之一

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳 - 玻璃底盘和铝制框架

尺寸比较

特点 -Android 12，最多256个内存和一个快速USB-C端口

软件 -Android 12和One UI 4.1，用于Galaxy S22。

通信和GNSS - WiFi 6和精确的GPS

电话功能和语音质量

相机 - 良好的照片，视频也可选择HDR10+。

配件和保修 - 不包括电源装置

输入设备和操作 - 显示器中的超声波指纹传感器

显示器 - 高达1300cd/m²的明亮AMOLED面板

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - Exynos 2200，与竞争对手的距离可观

游戏 - 有FPS限制的游戏

排放 - 负载下快速节流

温度

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

发言人

Samsung Galaxy S22 audio analysis

Xiaomi 12 audio analysis

电池寿命 - 尽管减少了电池尺寸，但仍有坚实的平均水平

消耗功率

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

三星Galaxy S22的评语

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare