Notebookcheck Logo

三星Galaxy S23 FE 评测--作为粉丝服务的智能手机

只对粉丝开放？ 时隔一年之后，三星通过Galaxy S23 FE 重新推出了其粉丝版。在我们的测试中，你会发现它到底能给你带来多少 "粉丝服务"，还是仅仅挤进了中端和高端之间。
5G Android Touchscreen Smartphone Galaxy S
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）

三星Galaxy S23 FE 是继 Galaxy S21 FE之后推出的，因为没有 S22 FE。三星已经取消了前代产品的 microSD 插槽，尽管它仍然使用高通 SoC。但现在它已被内置的 Exynos 2200欧洲用户已经从Galaxy S22 系列中了解了这一系统。

除此之外，这家韩国制造商只做了一些调整，其中还包括显示屏、存储和更新规定。显而易见的是，最新的 "粉丝版 "将更加经济实惠。配备 6/128GB 的 S21 FE 的建议零售价仍为 749 欧元（约合 816 美元），而配备 8/128GB 的 S23 FE 现在的起价为 649 欧元（约合 707 美元）。想拥有两倍内部存储空间的用户需要支付 699 欧元（约合 761 美元）。

那么，这是一笔划算的交易吗？还是只是粉丝服务？

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Galaxy S Series)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 2200 8 x 1.8 - 2.8 GHz, Exynos X2 / Cortex-A710 / A510
Graphics adapter
Samsung Xclipse 920
Memory
8 GB 
Display
6.40 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 403 PPI, capacitive, Dynamic AMOLED x2, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 107.6 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: proximity, accelerometer, magnetometer, gyroscope, barometer, OTG, DeX
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.2 x 158 x 76.5
Battery
4500 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, 1/1.56", OIS) + 12 MPix (ultra wide, f/2.2, 1/3.2") + 8 MPix (3x zoom, f/2.4, 1/4.4"); Camera2 API Level: Full
Secondary Camera: 10 MPix (f/2.4, FF)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: onscreen, Android 14 and One UI 6.0 via update, 24 Months Warranty, eSIM, GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1, E5a), BeiDou (B1, B2a); Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, LDAC, SSC; HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+; Head-SAR: 0.76 W/kg, Body-SAR: 1.045 W/kg; IP68; DRM Widevine L1, fanless, waterproof
Weight
209 g
Price
699 Euro
Links
Samsung notebook section
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
85.5 %
03/2024
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920		209 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.40"2340x1080
90.5 %
03/2023
Samsung Galaxy S23
SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740		167 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.10"2340x1080
88.8 %
02/2022
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660		177 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.40"2340x1080
88.9 %
11/2023
Google Pixel 8
Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7		187 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.20"2400x1080
89.4 %
05/2023
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740		199 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.67"2400x1080
87.4 %
08/2023
Nothing Phone (2)
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730		201.2 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2412x1080
Galaxy S23 FE 的所有颜色版本（摄影：Daniel Schmidt）
Galaxy S23 FE 的所有颜色版本

三星Galaxy S23 FE 采用了相当厚重的铝制边框，其锋利的边缘会刺痛手掌。由于 S23 的边缘更加圆润，因此握起来感觉更加舒适。风扇版的正面和背面均采用康宁大猩猩玻璃 5 保护层。

我们注意到重量明显增加。前代产品只有 177 克（约 6.2 盎司）重，Galaxy 23 甚至只有 167 克（约 5.9 盎司）重，而Galaxy S23 FE 则达到了 209 克（约 7.4 盎司）重。尽管显示屏和电池的尺寸与 S21 FE 相似，但我们测试机的尺寸在所有尺寸上都有所增加，这反映在宽边框上，导致 83% 的屏占比相当一般。

Galaxy 智能手机有六种不同的颜色版本：薄荷色、石墨色、奶油色、紫色、靛蓝色和橘色。后两种颜色仅在三星商店有售。所有机型的背面都是光面，容易留下指纹。做工给人留下了不错的印象，材质之间的过渡紧密而均匀。S23 FE 在试图翘起时只会发出一些非常轻微的吱吱声。此外，它还再次通过了 IP68 认证，具备防尘和防水功能。

(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）

尺寸比较

❌
162.1 mm 76.4 mm 8.6 mm 201.2 g161.2 mm 74.8 mm 8.6 mm 199 g158 mm 76.5 mm 8.2 mm 209 g155.7 mm 74.5 mm 7.9 mm 177 g150.5 mm 70.8 mm 8.9 mm 187 g146.3 mm 70.9 mm 7.6 mm 167 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备 -Galaxy S23 FE 几乎没有任何变化

三星智能手机提供了与其前代产品类似的设备。USB 3.2 端口（Gen.1）继续配备，同时支持 OTG 和有线图像输出，尽管它的传输速度并不快，在我们的拷贝测试中仅为 199.57 MB/s。如果将 S23 FE 连接到外接显示器，可以使用 DeX 桌面模式或直接镜像内容。无论哪种情况，都无法实现全高清以上的效果。

传感器阵列中仅新增了气压计，并支持蓝牙 5.3。电源按钮仍然是一个多功能按键，可在设置中进行配置。

上图：SIM 卡、麦克风（摄影：丹尼尔-施密特）
顶部：SIM 卡、麦克风
左侧（摄影：丹尼尔-施密特）
左侧
右：音量、功能键（摄影：Daniel Schmidt）
右：音量、功能键
底部：扬声器、麦克风、USB、麦克风（摄影：Daniel Schmidt）
底部：扬声器、麦克风、USB、麦克风

软件 -Android 13，5 年更新一次

虽然三星Galaxy S23 FE 最初交付时搭载的是Android 13，但此时它已经收到了Android 14 和 One UI 6.0 的更新。升级到 One UI 6.1 后，它包含了许多新的Galaxy AI 功能，我们已经从 Galaxy S24 Ultra的许多新的人工智能功能。我们报道).

三星承诺总共提供四次重大更新（最高可达Android 17）和五年的安全补丁。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 -Galaxy S23 FE 支持三频无线局域网

虽然三星Galaxy S23 FE 还不支持 Wi-Fi 7，但它支持 Wi-Fi 6E，也支持 6 GHz 频段。当连接到华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器时，它能达到很高且稳定的传输速率。

在移动通信方面，三星智能手机也具有良好的特性，支持包括 5G-Sub6 在内的所有常用标准。

Networking
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
iperf3 receive AXE11000
914 (min: 461) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
822 (min: 789) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1588 (min: 1465) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1446 (min: 1398) MBit/s ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy S23
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1659 (min: 1603) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1749 (min: 1253) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1799 (min: 1744) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1590 (min: 1562) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
855 (min: 649) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
737 (min: 358) MBit/s ∼42%
Google Pixel 8
iperf3 receive AXE11000
891 (min: 440) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
867 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1570 (min: 1043) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1521 (min: 1325) MBit/s ∼96%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
824 (min: 689) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
826 (min: 776) MBit/s ∼52%
Nothing Phone (2)
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1513 (min: 1097) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
799 (min: 577) MBit/s ∼50%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
651 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼39%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
687 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼39%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1536 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1364 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼86%
09018027036045054063072081090099010801170126013501440153016201710Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Exynos 2200, Samsung Xclipse 920; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1588 (1465-1658)
Google Pixel 8 Google Tensor G3, ARM Mali-G715 MP7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1570 (1043-1725)
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Exynos 2200, Samsung Xclipse 920; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1444 (1398-1497)
Google Pixel 8 Google Tensor G3, ARM Mali-G715 MP7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1520 (1325-1685)
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Exynos 2200, Samsung Xclipse 920; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø897 (461-932)
Google Pixel 8 Google Tensor G3, ARM Mali-G715 MP7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø876 (440-911)
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Exynos 2200, Samsung Xclipse 920; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø822 (789-857)
Google Pixel 8 Google Tensor G3, ARM Mali-G715 MP7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø852 (459-948)
GPS 测试：户外
户外活动
GPS 测试：室内
室内

Galaxy S23 FE 在室内也能快速、准确地确定位置。

在一次自行车旅行中，我们将三星智能手机与 Garmin Venu 2 进行了比较。尽管健身智能手表在建筑密集区的定位精度更高，但 S23 FE 在环湖时的定位精度更高，整体定位能力非常出色。

全球导航卫星系统测试路线：环湖
全球导航卫星系统测试路线：环湖
全球导航卫星系统测试路线：转折点
全球导航卫星系统测试路线：转折点
全球导航卫星系统测试路线：概述
全球导航卫星系统测试路线：概述

电话功能和语音质量

在通话方面，Galaxy S23 FE 的整体表现不错。它支持 VoLTE 和 WLAN 通话等目前常见的功能。系统中没有集成 SIP 账户控制功能，但也支持 eSIM。

通过听筒，语音质量听起来确实不错，大部分噪音都被可靠地过滤掉了。不过，我们仍然发现，噪音抑制功能在 Galaxy S23或 S24.在扬声器模式下，S23 FE 的麦克风范围很远（约 1.5 米，5 英尺），只有极小的回声，给人留下了深刻印象。

相机 -Galaxy S23 FE 没有专家级 RAW 格式

使用Galaxy S23 FE 拍摄的自拍照
使用Galaxy S23 FE 拍摄的自拍照

Galaxy S23 FE 的前置摄像头分辨率低于 S23 的兄弟机型，感光度也较低，仅为 f/2.4。也没有自动对焦功能。在日光条件下，它仍能提供不错的效果，对于社交媒体来说绰绰有余，但在光线较弱的条件下，你很容易看到一些图像噪点。您可以用它以高达 60 FPS 的速度录制超高清分辨率的视频。

主摄像头与同类机型类似。主传感器是一个 50 百万像素镜头，支持光学防抖（OIS）。此外，还有一个分辨率为 1200 万像素的超广角镜头和一个分辨率为 800 万像素的 3 倍光学变焦镜头。这三个镜头均不提供微距功能。

主摄像头的性能相当不错，也与 Galaxy S23.不过，我们注意到 S23 FE 的摄像头动态范围稍低，尤其是在全景照片中。在弱光条件下，两款相机的表现处于同一水平，超广角镜头的拍摄效果也很相似。但在变焦时，可以明显看出长焦镜头的分辨率较低。最大数码变焦为 30 倍。

在相机应用程序的设置中，您不必接受任何妥协，两种专业模式和 RAW 选项均可使用。但是，那些希望使用天文摄影选项的用户就无法使用Galaxy S23 FE 了，因为 S23 FE 无法通过Galaxy 商店加载专家 RAW应用程序。

您可以使用主摄像头录制 8k/24、超高清/60、全高清/60 或高清/30 格式的视频。您不仅可以使用专业模式选择更多帧频（如 120 FPS 的全高清），还可以进行多种设置，例如以 21:9 格式录制视频。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltrawide angle5x zoomLow-light

在控制光线的条件下，我们的测试图在图像中央看起来略微过度锐化。向边缘靠近时，清晰度会迅速降低，但仍保持在中等水平。

虽然色彩还原还算不错，但特别是一些蓝色调显示出非常高的 DeltaE 偏差，这也反映在明显的过度饱和上。

ColorChecker
1.2 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
1.4 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
2 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
4 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S23 FE: 5.01 ∆E min: 1.2 - max: 14.36 ∆E
ColorChecker
14.1 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
19.5 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
25.1 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
15 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
21.4 ∆E
25 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
19.5 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
21.3 ∆E
23.1 ∆E
20.1 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S23 FE: 18.63 ∆E min: 9.39 - max: 25.09 ∆E

配件和保修 - 三星智能手机附带一条 USB 数据线

Galaxy S23 FE 的随附配件非常少：除了一根 USB 数据线外，只有一个 SIM 卡工具和几张宣传单。

在德国，保修期为 24 个月，可通过 Care+ 套餐延长保修期。根据所选的期限和范围，费用在 49 至 139 欧元（约合 53 至 151 美元）之间。

输入设备和操作 -Galaxy S23 FE 中的光学指纹识别器

三星Galaxy S23 FE 的电容式触摸屏能快速、可靠地响应所有输入。它的康宁大猩猩 Glas 5 具有非常好的滑动特性，而且上面没有额外的保护膜。

线性振动电机即使在最大功率时也非常安静。因此，喜欢清脆反馈的用户可能会不太满意。

显示屏中集成了光学指纹传感器，用于生物识别安全。它的响应速度非常快，而且工作可靠。此外，您还可以使用前置摄像头设置安全性较低的人脸识别功能。

显示屏 - AMOLED，最高 120 Hz

子像素网格
子像素网格

三星Galaxy S23 FE 配备了一块 6.4 英寸 AMOLED 显示屏，提供扩展的全高清分辨率和高达 120 Hz 的刷新率。不过，这不是 LTPO 面板，因此系统只能在 60 和 120 Hz 之间自动切换刷新率。

不出所料，与前代产品相比，显示屏亮度有所提高，但仍明显低于 Galaxy S23或 S24.在纯白背景和激活亮度传感器的情况下，我们测得的平均亮度为 908 cd/m²。在亮部和暗部均匀分布的情况下 (APL18)，亮度值最高可达 1,367 cd/m²，而在 HDR 再现时，我们测得的峰值为 1,410 cd/m²。如果手动调节亮度，最高亮度可达 414 cd/m²。

Galaxy S23 FE 的最低亮度较低，还可选配蓝光滤镜，配备了一些重要功能，即使在黑暗中也能轻松护眼。与此相反，我们还看到了一些不同的 OLED 闪烁现象。在最低亮度下，它的闪烁频率在 120 到 240 Hz 之间。尽管在我们的测量系列中，在固定变焦级别和最低亮度下，这种现象看起来仍然相当无害，但这是由于缩放造成的，你可以在信息框中看到放大版的振幅。如果稍微提高亮度，就会出现相对较低的 120 Hz 频率，但此时振幅保持不变。从手动亮度的 47% 开始，频率只会增加一倍。因此，敏感用户在使用时可能会遇到一些困难。

896
cd/m²		903
cd/m²		921
cd/m²
897
cd/m²		897
cd/m²		923
cd/m²
903
cd/m²		911
cd/m²		925
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 925 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 908.4 cd/m² Minimum: 1.63 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 897 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.08
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Dynamic AMOLED x2, 2340x1080, 6.40		Samsung Galaxy S23
Dynamic AMOLED 2x, 2340x1080, 6.10		Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2340x1080, 6.40		Google Pixel 8
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.20		Motorola Edge 40 Pro
P-OLED, 2400x1080, 6.67		Nothing Phone (2)
OLED, 2412x1080, 6.70
Screen
-25%
-6%
17%
13%
17%
Brightness middle
897
1125
25%
758
-15%
1450
62%
1056
18%
951
6%
Brightness
908
1122
24%
758
-17%
1410
55%
1055
16%
948
4%
Brightness Distribution
97
96
-1%
99
2%
92
-5%
92
-5%
98
1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.2
3.2
-45%
1.5
32%
1.1
50%
1.28
42%
1
55%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.1
4.9
-58%
3.1
-0%
4.2
-35%
2.85
8%
2.2
29%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.7
3.3
-94%
2.3
-35%
2.1
-24%
1.7
-0%
1.6
6%
Gamma
2.08 106%
1.97 112%
2.06 107%
2.24 98%
2.206 100%
2.203 100%
CCT
6617 98%
6504 100%
6378 102%
6584 99%
6320 103%
6516 100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最小显示亮度
分钟
25% 显示屏亮度
25%
50% 显示亮度
50%
75% 显示亮度
75%
最大手动显示亮度
100%

在固定变焦级别和各种亮度设置下的测量系列

三星Galaxy S23 FE 在"自然"显示模式下实现了最自然的色彩再现，该模式提供了良好的校准，并以 sRGB 色彩空间为目标。

默认的 "鲜艳"模式看起来更冷，色彩饱和度更高。

灰度（显示模式：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（显示模式：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩（显示模式：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩（显示模式：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（显示模式：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（显示模式：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（显示模式：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（显示模式：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.59 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.836 ms rise
↘ 0.751 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.702 ms rise
↘ 0.7355 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Galaxy S23 FE 具有足够高的亮度，非常适合户外使用。只有在阳光非常充足的日子里，才可能会有一些轻微的限制，但这也可能是由于屏幕表面的反光造成的。

户外活动
户外活动
户外活动
户外活动

AMOLED 面板的视角稳定性很好。即使从非常陡峭的视角观看，亮度损失也很小。虽然我们没有注意到任何色调，但显示屏会稍稍变冷，但这并不妨碍日常操作。

三星Galaxy S23 FE 的视角稳定性
三星Galaxy S23 FE 的视角稳定性

性能 -Galaxy S23 FE 采用 Exynos 2200 处理器。

三星Galaxy S23 FE 由 Exynos 2200我们已经从Galaxy S22 系列中了解到该处理器。该处理器由 8 GB 工作内存支持。

相应地，其性能也与两年前的旗舰机型相差无几。系统基准测试的结果甚至略逊一筹，这可能与软件更新有关。

但Galaxy S23 FE 在日常操作中仍能提供非常流畅的系统性能。

Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.2 | Antutu v9 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | Geekbench ML
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1549 Points +33%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1418 Points +22%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1260 Points +9%
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1255 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1161 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2200
  (1133 - 1161, n=4)
1148 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1145 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
1092 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=220, last 2 years)
911 Points -22%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
4974 Points +32%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
4192 Points +11%
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4045 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
3768 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2200
  (3474 - 3768, n=4)
3600 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
3474 Points -8%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
3395 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
3204 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=220, last 2 years)
2988 Points -21%
Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1984 Points +24%
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1719 Points +7%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1653 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1601 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2200
  ()
1601 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 2930, n=105, last 2 years)
1390 Points -13%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
5149 Points +31%
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4584 Points +16%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
4225 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
3938 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2200
  ()
3938 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 7408, n=105, last 2 years)
3840 Points -2%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1249078 Points +52%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1134684 Points +38%
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
932991 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
822897 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
813746 Points -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200
  (704479 - 850401, n=4)
797881 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
743221 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=153, last 2 years)
738503 Points -10%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
603046 Points -27%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1508318 Points +34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (281399 - 2162423, n=51, last 2 years)
1249818 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1124908 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2200
  ()
1124908 Points 0%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1107295 Points -2%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
16612 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
15270 Points +13%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
15130 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
14107 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
14068 Points +4%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200
  (12579 - 14998, n=4)
13805 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
13573 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=215, last 2 years)
11771 Points -13%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
10897 Points -20%
CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1221 Points +38%
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1116 Points +26%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200
  (888 - 1129, n=4)
979 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
957 Points +8%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
955 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
888 Points
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
871 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (200 - 1474, n=165, last 2 years)
837 Points -6%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
778 Points -12%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
8830 Points +23%
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7839 Points +9%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
7466 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
7179 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6991 Points -3%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
6974 Points -3%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200
  (6319 - 7186, n=4)
6919 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
5839 Points -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)
5759 Points -20%
System
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
14401 Points +30%
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12171 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
11210 Points +1%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
11159 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
11081 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2200
  (10464 - 11373, n=4)
11032 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)
9672 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
9119 Points -18%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
8251 Points -26%
Memory
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
9115 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
8871 Points +17%
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
8458 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
7614 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2200
  (6212 - 7614, n=4)
6771 Points -11%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
6601 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6413 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)
6267 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
6248 Points -18%
Graphics
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
26837 Points +50%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
26748 Points +49%
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
19110 Points +7%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
18975 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
17941 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2200
  (17104 - 17941, n=4)
17447 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
17269 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)
14220 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
13588 Points -24%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1924 Points +10%
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1919 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1779 Points +1%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200
  (1434 - 1960, n=4)
1768 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1755 Points
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1657 Points -6%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1572 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
1501 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)
1495 Points -15%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
25563 Points +146%
Average of class Smartphone
  (207 - 84787, n=150, last 2 years)
21814 Points +110%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
16702 Points +61%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
15782 Points +52%
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13807 Points +33%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200
  (10374 - 10841, n=2)
10608 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
10374 Points
Geekbench ML
0.6 TensorFlow Lite CPU
Average of class Smartphone
  (509 - 1342, n=8, last 2 years)
1129 Points +122%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
509 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2200
  ()
509 Points 0%
0.6 TensorFlow Lite GPU
Average of class Smartphone
  (978 - 1478, n=8, last 2 years)
1185 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1021 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2200
  ()
1021 Points 0%
0.6 TensorFlow Lite NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone
  (378 - 3410, n=8, last 2 years)
894 Points +116%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
413 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2200
  ()
413 Points 0%

三星 三星 Xclipse 920基于 AMD RDNA 2 架构的三星 Xclipse 920 是当时首款支持基于硬件的光线追踪技术的智能手机 GPU。Galaxy S23 FE 的用户应该也能从中受益。不过，在基准测试中，我们也注意到一些更先进的 GPU 明显更快。即使是 Adreno 730在 Nothing Phone (2)性能也要高出 20% 到 56%。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3699 Points +117%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3503 Points +106%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2538 Points +49%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2439 Points +43%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1702 Points
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
974 Points -43%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3857 Points +127%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3280 Points +93%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2754 Points +62%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2422 Points +42%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1702 Points
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1500 Points -12%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13911 Points +116%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8977 Points +39%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6440 Points
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5872 Points -9%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8635 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6350 Points
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5683 Points -11%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5603 Points +56%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3589 Points
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5583 Points +54%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3631 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6185 Points +44%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4995 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4378 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4288 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21767 Points +85%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13546 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11774 Points
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11309 Points -4%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13955 Points +65%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9813 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8483 Points
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8366 Points -1%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +1%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +1%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
479 fps +120%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
459 fps +111%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
349 fps +60%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
317 fps +45%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
218 fps
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
178 fps -18%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +7%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
112 fps
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
103 fps -8%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78 fps -30%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -46%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
301 fps +123%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
271 fps +101%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
211 fps +56%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
135 fps
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
109 fps -19%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97 fps -28%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +35%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +35%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
73 fps -18%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps -27%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -33%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
214 fps +112%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
186 fps +84%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
134 fps +33%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
92 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps -26%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
109 fps +95%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
107 fps +91%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps +5%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps -25%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
125 fps +98%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
123 fps +95%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76 fps +21%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
74 fps +17%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
45 fps -29%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps +133%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
85 fps +102%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps +40%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps +33%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps +125%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
61 fps +118%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps +50%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps +32%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28 fps
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
25 fps -11%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +94%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +94%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps +21%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62 fps
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51 fps -18%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
151 fps +96%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
141 fps +83%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
113 fps +47%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 fps +29%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77 fps
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps -30%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps +150%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
28 fps +133%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps +67%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps +33%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12 fps

在基准测试中，三星Galaxy S23 FE 的浏览器性能良好。只有在 Jetstream 2.0 中，即使多次尝试，结果还是出人意料地低。不过，在日常操作中并没有发现类似的问题。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Nothing Phone (2) (Chrome 114)
178.548 Points +1189%
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)
158.595 Points +1045%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)
106.1 Points +666%
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)
104.25 Points +653%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro (Chrome 112)
100.8 Points +628%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (13.8 - 107.4, n=4)
78.6 Points +468%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Chrome 96)
63.9 Points +361%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Chrome 121)
13.847 Points
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Nothing Phone (2) (Chrome 114)
162 runs/min +18%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Chrome 121)
137 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)
136 runs/min -1%
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)
136 runs/min -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (105 - 137, n=4)
115.3 runs/min -16%
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)
107.1 runs/min -22%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro (Chome 112)
70.4 runs/min -49%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Chrome 96)
46.92 runs/min -66%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Nothing Phone (2) (Chrome 114)
147 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)
146 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Chrome 121)
130 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 ()
130 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=160, last 2 years)
100.2 Points -23%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro (Chrome 112)
99 Points -24%
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)
94 Points -28%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)
59913 Points +17%
Nothing Phone (2) (Chrome 114)
52931 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Chrome 121)
51202 Points
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)
47776 Points -7%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (34055 - 51202, n=4)
42162 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=214, last 2 years)
33357 Points -35%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro (Chrome 112)
31254 Points -39%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Chrome 96)
31070 Points -39%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)
1595 ms * -90%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Chrome 96)
1417 ms * -69%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (840 - 1566, n=4)
1306 ms * -55%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro (Chrome 112)
1265.2 ms * -51%
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)
998 ms * -19%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Chrome 121)
840.3 ms *
Nothing Phone (2) (Chrome 114)
755.5 ms * +10%
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)
701.7 ms * +16%

* ... smaller is better

Galaxy S23 FE 使用 128 或 256 GB UFS 3.1 存储空间，具体取决于版本。这在同类产品中是非常快的，尽管它显然被更现代的 UFS 4.0 存储器超越了。

Samsung Galaxy S23 FESamsung Galaxy S23Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5GGoogle Pixel 8Motorola Edge 40 ProNothing Phone (2)Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-3%
-19%
-15%
106%
25%
-16%
-7%
Sequential Read 256KB
1657.44
3133.7 ?(UFS 4.0)
89%

1686.71 ?(UFS 3.1)
2%

1639
-1%
1655.48
0%
3434.4
107%
1949.5
18%
1599 ?(1030 - 3134, n=56)
-4%
1508 ?(226 - 4512, n=218, last 2 years)
-9%
Sequential Write 256KB
994.67
844 ?(UFS 4.0)
-15%

628.53 ?(UFS 3.1)
-37%

760
-24%
895.86
-10%
2887.4
190%
1517.6
53%
777 ?(233 - 1332, n=56)
-22%
1118 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=218, last 2 years)
12%
Random Read 4KB
322.32
427.61 ?(UFS 4.0)
33%

343.65 ?(UFS 3.1)
7%

245.1
-24%
183.55
-43%
451.3
40%
287.5
-11%
244 ?(126.2 - 428, n=56)
-24%
247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=218, last 2 years)
-23%
Random Write 4KB
288.23
156.69 ?(UFS 4.0)
-46%

130.26 ?(UFS 3.1)
-55%

211.2
-27%
266.68
-7%
539
87%
403.8
40%
245 ?(121.4 - 503, n=56)
-15%
272 ?(13 - 709, n=218, last 2 years)
-6%

游戏 - 三星智能手机，游戏性能不俗

钛 Xclipse 920为 Play Store 的所有游戏提供了足够的性能。我们使用GameBench对几款游戏进行了更详细的分析。PUBG》最多只能在 HDR 设置下运行，在平衡或高清模式下无法超过 40 FPS。尽管在《源氏冲击》中可以达到 60 FPS，但仍会不时出现一些小的卡顿，尤其是在要求较高的设置下。

对于大多数游戏来说，现有的性能应该是绰绰有余的，尽管发烧友们并不能满足他们所有的愿望。与其他大多数Galaxy 智能手机一样，Galaxy S23 FE 也可以使用 Gaming Hub。

PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
源泉冲击
源泉冲击
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø59.5 (44-61)
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE; Genshin Impact; medium 120 fps: Ø59.3 (41-61)
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø58.2 (45-61)
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø58.3 (38-60)
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø39.5 (31-41)
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø39.8 (36-41)

排放 - 风扇版提供双扬声器

温度

在空闲运行时，Galaxy S23 FE 的表面温度很低。不出所料，在压力测试期间，温度会急剧升高，我们使用 Burnout Benchmark 对其进行了模拟。尽管温度并不低，最高可达 46.8 °C（116 °F），但仍保持在无需担心的范围内。

在 3DMark 的压力测试中，三星所宣传的散热改进变得非常明显，因为 S23 FE 能够在长时间负载情况下保持性能，比 S22、S22 FE、S22 FE 和 S22 FE 等机型都要好。 Galaxy S22相比，采用相同 SoC 的 S22但性能仍有明显下降。

Max. Load
 44.1 °C45.3 °C42.8 °C 
 46.2 °C46.8 °C44 °C 
 45.9 °C46.2 °C44.8 °C 
Maximum: 46.8 °C
Average: 45.1 °C
41 °C45.5 °C45.6 °C
43.1 °C44.5 °C46.5 °C
42.9 °C46.3 °C46.8 °C
Maximum: 46.8 °C
Average: 44.7 °C
Room Temperature 20.3 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 45.1 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.2 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
83.4 % +19%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69.9 %
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68.6 % -2%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
65.7 % -6%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60.2 % -14%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58.6 % -16%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
87.3 % +19%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79 % +7%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
74.6 % +1%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
73.5 %
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56.1 % -24%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53.8 % -27%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69 %
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø8.59 (7.53-10.2)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø15.5 (12.4-23.1)
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø30.9 (26.6-38.1)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø58.5 (52.3-76.3)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø66.7 (56-85.8)
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø9.91 (8.77-12)
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø9.78 (8.18-11.9)

发言人

三星Galaxy S23 FE 的两个扬声器在中等音量范围内能产生良好的音效。如果调高智能手机的音量，低音不足的问题会变得更加明显，高音有时也会略微失真。

您可以使用 USB-C 端口为有线耳机输出声音。在无线连接方面，可以使用蓝牙 5.3，但与其他智能手机一样，三星并没有提供很多现代音频编解码器。尽管也可以流式传输到多个蓝牙接收器，但只能使用 SBC 编解码器。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2028.631.52525.927.23123.424.74027.331.15036.240.26325.426.68016.626.510016.932.212514.742.816013.152.420015.152.925014.35631511.657.34001058.75009.163.863011.162.38009.167.6100011.873.812501577.5160011.377.620001278.7250012.377.7315012.778.8400012.682.5500013.175.6630013.470.1800013.569.81000013.570.91250013.6651600013.662.5SPL24.788.8N0.671.7median 13.1median 69.8Delta1.39.738.439.631.239.125.129.629.932.132.137.623.133.523.63422.433.316.839.316.550.513.45414.153.512.954.31357.211.768.111.671.712.97613.377.213.176.312.473.812.673.512.571.912.475.712.778.413.181.413.579.713.678.213.478.113.681.313.474.425890.677.6median 13.1median 74.41.29.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy S23 FEGoogle Pixel 8
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Google Pixel 8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - Exynos 依然耗电

耗电量

在功耗方面，Galaxy S23 FE 的功耗相当高。空闲运行时的功耗值已经高于Galaxy S23，而在负载情况下，SoC 的功耗也很高。

三星智能手机的有线充电器充电功率可达 25 瓦，充满电需要 1.5 小时。此外还支持无线充电和无线 PowerShare。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.03 / 0.24 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.69 / 1.15 / 1.26 Watt
Load midlight 15.93 / 16.09 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
4500 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S23
3900 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
4500 mAh		Google Pixel 8
4575 mAh		Motorola Edge 40 Pro
4600 mAh		Nothing Phone (2)
4700 mAh		Average Samsung Exynos 2200
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
44%
1%
25%
16%
13%
17%
6%
Idle Minimum *
0.69
0.57
17%
1.01
-46%
0.56
19%
0.7
-1%
0.9
-30%
0.668 ?(0.58 - 0.71, n=4)
3%
0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years)
-30%
Idle Average *
1.15
0.74
36%
1.5
-30%
1.08
6%
0.8
30%
1.1
4%
1.038 ?(0.71 - 1.19, n=4)
10%
1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years)
-26%
Idle Maximum *
1.26
0.83
34%
1.6
-27%
1.17
7%
1.3
-3%
1.4
-11%
1.218 ?(1.16 - 1.26, n=4)
3%
1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years)
-29%
Load Average *
15.93
4.26
73%
5.54
65%
8.01
50%
10
37%
5
69%
9.43 ?(6.97 - 15.9, n=4)
41%
5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years)
65%
Load Maximum *
16.09
6.16
62%
9.16
43%
8.89
45%
13.7
15%
10.4
35%
11.5 ?(8.85 - 16.1, n=4)
29%
8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years)
48%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011121314Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Exynos 2200; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.24 (0.961-14.4)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.19 (0.819-14)
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Exynos 2200; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.913 (0.859-1.222)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.699 (0.602-1.197)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Exynos 2200; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø12.6 (11.7-13.4)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.8 (10.5-13)
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Exynos 2200; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.913 (0.859-1.222)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.699 (0.602-1.197)

电池寿命

Galaxy S23 FE 拥有一块相当大的 4,500 毫安时电池，这有助于它实现基本良好的续航时间。不过，如果直接将其与Galaxy S23（3,900 毫安时）进行比较，续航时间会明显降低，这可以追溯到 Exynos 2200.

在 "Burnout Benchmark "的负载测试中，这一点尤为明显，三星智能手机的续航时间仅为 73 分钟。由于负载下的不良值并未真正纳入评估，我们决定略微降低分级。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
26h 15min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 120)
13h 35min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
18h 03min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 13min
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
4500 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S23
3900 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
4500 mAh		Google Pixel 8
4575 mAh		Motorola Edge 40 Pro
4600 mAh		Nothing Phone (2)
4700 mAh
Battery Runtime
120%
96%
51%
90%
76%
Reader / Idle
1575
2249
43%
1430
-9%
1493
-5%
2102
33%
1744
11%
H.264
1083
1255
16%
934
-14%
1363
26%
1062
-2%
1245
15%
WiFi v1.3
815
926
14%
594
-27%
814
0%
984
21%
909
12%
Load
73
370
407%
388
432%
205
181%
297
307%
268
267%

Pros

+ 良好的显示效果
+ IP68 认证
+ 更新周期长
+ 良好的定位功能
+ 无线充电
+ 支持 eSIM

Cons

- 效率低
- 支持的蓝牙音频编解码器很少
- 不必要的重量和锋利的边缘

评语 - 粉丝们的喜悦看起来与众不同，但...

测试三星Galaxy S23 FE。测试机由三星德国公司和 notebooksbilliger.de 提供（照片：Daniel Schmidt）
测试三星Galaxy S23 FE。测试机由三星德国公司和 notebooksbilliger.de 提供（照片：Daniel Schmidt）

毫无疑问，三星Galaxy S23 FE 是一款优秀的智能手机。但我们认为，给它贴上粉丝版（FE）的标签至少是值得商榷的。在前代产品中，microSD 插槽等用户喜爱的功能已经被取消，而且从 Snapdragon 换成 Exynos，我们怀疑粉丝们会不会很高兴。此外，该机还配备了低频 PWM 调光显示屏。为什么不干脆再用一块好的 PLS 面板呢，三星？

三星Galaxy S23 FE 是一款介于 A 系列和高端产品之间的优秀智能手机。

但总体而言，三星仍在继续提供一款真正的好产品，并在配置方面取得了不错的成绩。除了蓝牙和 NFC 等必备功能外，它还提供 USB 3.2（包括 DeX）、Wi-Fi 6E、无线充电、eSIM 支持、IP68 认证和五年更新。而 Exynos 2200可能不是最高效的芯片组，但仍能确保非常出色的系统性能和良好的电池续航时间。

如果显示屏可以稍微小一点，那么与 Galaxy S23进行比较：尽管 S23 的价格略高，而且已经推出一年，但它在各方面的综合表现仍然更胜一筹。其他功能强大的替代产品有 小米 13T Pro和 Nothing Phone (2).

价格和供应情况

三星很快放弃了最初 699 欧元（约合 761 美元）的建议零售价。在我们进行测试时，Galaxy S23 FE 在美国的三星商店有售，起价约为 550 美元。在美国有售。亚马逊（Amazon）等其他销售商也提供类似价格的产品，其中翻新机型的起价更低（约 430 美元）。

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE - 03/15/2024 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
83%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
56 / 70 → 80%
Weight
88%
Battery
85%
Display
92%
Games Performance
60 / 64 → 93%
Application Performance
91 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
84%
Noise
100%
Audio
74 / 90 → 82%
Camera
74%
Average
80%
86%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 三星Galaxy S23 FE 评测--作为粉丝服务的智能手机
Daniel Schmidt, 2024-03-17 (Update: 2024-03-17)