Notebookcheck Logo

Aorus 17X XES回顾。配备i9-12900HX的游戏笔记本提供顶级性能

不仅是为了游戏。 凭借其360赫兹面板、RGB键盘和NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070 Ti，技嘉笔记本电脑完全为游戏而设计。同时，使用的英特尔处理器和内存数量也提供了丰富的动力。具体结果如何，将由我们的基准测试和游戏测试显示。
Alder Lake Gaming Geforce Windows Intel
Aorus 17X XES提供16个核心和24个线程。
Aorus 17X XES提供16个核心和24个线程。

凭借其最重要的关键规格，这款笔记本电脑注定要用于游戏。由于其360赫兹面板，Aorus 17X应该能很好地处理高帧率。考虑到英特尔i9-12900HX，这是目前Alder Lake级别最强大的移动处理器，拥有丰富的16个核心和NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070 Ti，这似乎根本不是一个虚幻的目标。此外，还有一个配备Nvidia RTX 3080 Ti的型号，承诺增加FPS，甚至应该稍快。

有了这么多的性能，竞争对手包括相应的装备良好的游戏笔记本电脑，如 MSI GE67 HX 12 UGS或申克XMG Pro 17 E22.另一个有趣的比较应该是与外部相同的 Aorus 17 XE4，它结合了相同的显卡和一个稍小的CPU。你也可以在Aorus 17 XE4 的评论中找到关于机箱、维护或输入设备的额外细节，因为这些部分对于Aorus 17X是相同的。

Aorus 17X XES (17X Series)
Processor
Intel Core i9-12900HX 16 x 1.7 - 5 GHz, 157 W PL2 / Short Burst, 86 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-HX
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1410 MHz, Memory: 1750 MHz, 130 W TDP ( including 15 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 511.65, Nvidia Advanced Optimus
Memory
32 GB 
, DDR5-4800, dual channel
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, Sharp SHP1563, IPS, glossy: no, 360 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM670 (Alder Lake-S PCH)
Storage
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10, 1024 GB 
, M.2 2280
Soundcard
Intel Alder Lake-S PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: headset port, Sensors: light
Networking
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 30 x 398 x 258
Battery
99 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix HD webcam
Additional features
Speakers: stereo 2 x 2.5 W, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, Gigabyte Control Center, 280-Watt power supply
Weight
2.74 kg, Power Supply: 1.03 kg
Price
2800 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
83.7 %
08/2022
Aorus 17X XES
i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU		2.7 kg30 mm17.30"1920x1080
86.3 %
09/2022
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU		2.8 kg31 mm17.30"1920x1080
87.7 %
07/2022
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU		2.5 kg23.4 mm15.60"1920x1080
85.4 %
07/2022
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU		2.8 kg27 mm17.30"2560x1440
87.4 %
06/2022
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU		2.4 kg23.4 mm15.60"3840x2160
88.2 %
05/2022
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU		2.6 kg20.5 mm16.00"3840x2400
85.2 %
04/2022
Aorus 17 XE4
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU		2.6 kg27 mm17.30"1920x1080

机箱 - Aorus 17X的大型冷却系统和大量的塑料。

由于体积大，重量重，而且以塑料为主，这款机箱充其量可以说是实用主义的。显示屏的盖子可以更结实一些，但总的来说，没有恼人的吱吱声，而且你还可以用一只手将盖子打开到130度，没有任何问题。考虑到沉重的底座，这当然不足为奇。白色的、发光的Aorus标志看起来很有吸引力。

尺寸比较

❌
398 mm 261 mm 31 mm 2.8 kg398 mm 258 mm 30 mm 2.7 kg398 mm 254 mm 27 mm 2.6 kg396 mm 262 mm 27 mm 2.8 kg358 mm 267 mm 23.4 mm 2.5 kg358 mm 267 mm 23.4 mm 2.4 kg355 mm 266 mm 20.5 mm 2.6 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

设备 - 最低限度，但适合于游戏笔记本电脑

连接的数量其实并不丰富。但至少，Thunderbolt 4确保了快速的数据传输。2.5-Gigabit LAN端口提供了类似的优势，不仅是创意专业人士应该对三个不同的视频输出端口感到满意。

左侧：2.5-Gbit LAN，HDMI，DisplayPort，USB-A（5Gbit/s）。
左侧：2.5-Gbit LAN，HDMI，DisplayPort，USB-A（5Gbit/s）。
右：耳机、USB-A（5Gbit/s）、Thunderbolt 4、电源
右：耳机、USB-A（5Gbit/s）、Thunderbolt 4、电源

通讯

WLAN模块，略微超过了游戏笔记本的平均传输速率，也提供了高带宽。但由于采用了Wi-Fi 6E，这里使用的标准也相应地强大。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1755 (1679min - 1765max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (853 - 1857, n=78, last 2 years)
1512 MBit/s -14%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (883 - 1857, n=171)
1492 MBit/s -15%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1461 (1392min - 1501max) MBit/s -17%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1648 (1133min - 1711max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (648 - 1878, n=76, last 2 years)
1474 MBit/s -11%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (632 - 1851, n=172)
1375 MBit/s -17%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1348 (1151min - 1393max) MBit/s -18%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750180018501900Tooltip
Aorus 17X XES Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1648 (1133-1711)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1481 (1314-1543)
Aorus 17X XES Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1755 (1679-1765)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1829 (831-1948)

网络摄像头

与Aorus 17 XE4一样，17X XES也使用一个简单的高清摄像头。由于其分辨率较低，它只是勉强适合视频通话。至少，即使在恶劣的光线条件下，所产生的图像也很容易辨认，而且颜色偏差仍在限制范围内。

另一方面，双阵列麦克风的效果也不错。来自不同方向和距离的录音在几乎相同的音量下被再现。不幸的是，声音听起来非常尖锐，但至少它们很容易被理解。

ColorChecker
8.8 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
12 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Aorus 17X XES: 8.89 ∆E min: 3.41 - max: 14.44 ∆E

输入设备--游戏键盘有多彩的照明效果

体面的键盘没有提供大的行程，但有舒适的阻力。框架几乎没有弯曲。至少，有了可自由配置的RGB照明，大量的功能键选择，以及全尺寸的数字块，就没有理由抱怨了。然而，我们必须小心，因为该键盘比标准键盘小得多，这可能会在打字时造成一些刺激。

显示 - 快速但不明亮

子像素网格
子像素网格
几乎没有任何明显的屏幕渗漏。
几乎没有任何明显的屏幕渗漏。

对角线为17.3英寸的大显示屏以其360赫兹的刷新率给人留下深刻印象。响应时间也相应变短。此外，还有一个体面的对比度，超过1000:1。高刷新率与全高清分辨率相结合。

不太有说服力的是亮度。即使在桌子上，270cd/m²的平均值有时也显得太低，而且照明缺乏动力。考虑到微弱的背景照明，屏幕出血仍在限制范围内，我们只注意到右上角有一个光晕，图像内容非常暗。

为了使显示器能够自动适应周围环境，技嘉为Aorus 17X配备了一个亮度传感器。虽然它工作可靠，但对于我们的口味来说，它启动的频率有点太高。仅仅通过将手移到前面来制造一些阴影，就可能导致亮度的调整，这也是每次都会报告的。

Nvidia Advanced Optimus在后台运行，将延迟限制在最低限度，确保在iGPU和游戏显卡之间的切换几乎不被注意。这对快速和竞争性游戏特别实用，但在一般情况下也很有用。

295
cd/m²		302
cd/m²		294
cd/m²
278
cd/m²		278
cd/m²		270
cd/m²
253
cd/m²		247
cd/m²		240
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Sharp SHP1563 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 302 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 273 cd/m² Minimum: 6 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 79 %
Center on Battery: 278 cd/m²
Contrast: 1069:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.96 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.07
ΔE Greyscale 6.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
71.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.224
Aorus 17X XES
Sharp SHP1563, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30		HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
BOE09EE, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30		MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Samsung ATNA562P02-0, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.60		SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
BOE099D, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30		MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
AUO51EB, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60		Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
BOE NE160QAM-NX1, IPS-Level, 3840x2400, 16.00		Aorus 17 XE4
Sharp LQ173M1JW12, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Display
-14%
-1%
19%
15%
20%
-1%
Display P3 Coverage
70.1
59.03
-16%
71.7
2%
97.5
39%
80.4
15%
98
40%
69
-2%
sRGB Coverage
99.9
87.46
-12%
89.7
-10%
99.9
0%
98.4
-2%
99.9
0%
99.4
-1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
71.9
61.04
-15%
75.2
5%
85.2
18%
94.7
32%
86.3
20%
71.2
-1%
Response Times
-192%
93%
-38%
-287%
-163%
-220%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
3.4 ?(1.4, 2)
14 ?(7, 7)
-312%
0.25 ?(0.13, 0.12)
93%
5.4 ?(2.3, 3.1)
-59%
18.8 ?(9.2, 9.6)
-453%
14.6 ?(6.7, 7.9)
-329%
15.2 ?(7.6, 7.6)
-347%
Response Time Black / White *
5.8 ?(2.5, 3.3)
10 ?(6, 4)
-72%
0.4 ?(0.2, 0.2)
93%
6.8 ?(2.9, 3.9)
-17%
12.8 ?(6.8, 6)
-121%
5.6 ?(2, 3.6)
3%
11.2 ?(6.8, 4.4)
-93%
PWM Frequency
100 ?(50)
480.4 ?(100)
Screen
8%
24%
20%
18%
16%
21%
Brightness middle
278
321
15%
356.1
28%
349
26%
351
26%
459
65%
274
-1%
Brightness
273
302
11%
358
31%
319
17%
347
27%
434
59%
267
-2%
Brightness Distribution
79
84
6%
99
25%
83
5%
90
14%
88
11%
82
4%
Black Level *
0.26
0.41
-58%
0.32
-23%
0.35
-35%
0.44
-69%
0.25
4%
Contrast
1069
783
-27%
1091
2%
1003
-6%
1043
-2%
1096
3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.96
1.62
59%
4.83
-22%
2.5
37%
2.54
36%
2.97
25%
2.07
48%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
10.78
4.08
62%
7.94
26%
6.87
36%
8.36
22%
8.13
25%
4.89
55%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.07
1.93
-80%
0.64
40%
0.67
37%
1.03
4%
0.83
22%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.8
1.24
82%
3.1
54%
3.9
43%
4.1
40%
4.9
28%
3
56%
Gamma
2.224 99%
2.41 91%
2.2 100%
2.09 105%
2.089 105%
2.235 98%
2.207 100%
CCT
7651 85%
6261 104%
5938 109%
7192 90%
7036 92%
6775 96%
6999 93%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-66% / -26%
39% / 30%
0% / 12%
-85% / -26%
-42% / -9%
-67% / -18%

* ... smaller is better

色彩空间的覆盖是针对游戏的最佳选择。sRGB色彩空间基本上可以完全重现。正如预期的那样，该显示器只能覆盖AdobeRGB或DCI-P3色彩空间的部分内容，这些色彩空间大多用于处理媒体。

卡尔曼：灰度
卡尔曼：灰度
卡尔曼：饱和度
卡尔曼：饱和度
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN：灰度（校准的）。
CalMAN：灰度（校准的）。
CalMAN: 饱和度(已校准)
CalMAN: 饱和度(已校准)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)

交付状态下的色彩准确性仍然可以改进。然而，你需要训练有素的眼睛才能真正注意到勉强达到4的DeltaE。在校准之后，我们测量的DeltaE只有1，这相当于一个几乎最佳的色彩再现。你可以从上面的链接中下载相关的颜色配置文件，在面板值的盒子底部。

Aorus 17X XES与sRGB对比
Aorus 17X XES与sRGB对比
Aorus 17X XES与AdobeRGB的对比
Aorus 17X XES与AdobeRGB的对比
Aorus 17X XES 与 P3 的对比
Aorus 17X XES 与 P3 的对比

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
5.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.5 ms rise
↘ 3.3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.4 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

在户外，照片几乎无法辨认，但你仍然可以阅读文字。
在户外，照片几乎无法辨认，但你仍然可以阅读文字。

很难推荐在户外使用Aorus 17X XES。在阳光直射下，你很难再认出任何东西。即使在阴凉处或从后面照过来，大多数颜色也会缺乏亮度。

这款笔记本电脑仍然足以用于网上冲浪或在阴暗处阅读。但是，图像处理或游戏只能建议在室内进行。

可视角度的稳定性是没有问题的，但我们对IPS面板没有别的期望。即使在几乎90°的陡峭视角下，我们也没有观察到任何颜色变化。虽然亮度降低了，但这并不妨碍识别。

性能--i9 CPU在游戏笔记本中占主导地位

硬件设备证明自己足以满足全高清分辨率的要求。所有目前和很可能还有许多未来的游戏都可以在游戏笔记本电脑上顺利播放，没有任何妥协。如果你能接受较少的细节，非常高的帧率也变得现实，并且由于360赫兹（包括可变刷新率），可以最佳地显示。

此外，总共有24个线程的极快的处理器与32GB的DDR5内存相结合，也允许使用它进行除图形应用之外的苛刻计算。计算性能决不需要隐藏在工作站中。

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z存储
CPU-Z存储
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
HWiNFO

测试条件

对于所有的测试、游戏和基准测试，以及从文本和图像处理到上网的额外任务，我们使用了技嘉控制中心的性能配置文件的自动切换，这被称为 "Ai Boost"。这不仅可以调整CPU的功率限制，而且颜色配置文件和风扇或键盘的行为也会根据情况而改变。下表显示了为处理器分配了多少功率。

总的来说，该系统工作可靠，能识别所有程序，并将它们与相应的模式联系起来。然而，我们发现颜色配置文件之间非常明显的变化，总是发生一些延迟，这有点令人讨厌。例如，当关闭浏览器并启动一个激活创作者模式的写作程序时，这一点就很明显。

虽然当电源插头从插座上拔下时，完全关闭键盘照明似乎很有必要，但在晚上仍然不大实用。

独立于智能控制，性能配置文件也可以单独调整到最小的细节，以便根据自己的喜好来定位。然而，你需要手动切换它们。你可以通过按下按钮来做到这一点，这也是你可以调整风扇配置文件的同样方式。

游戏模式 创造者模式 涡轮模式 会议 省电模式
pl1 65 w 86 w 86 w 15 w 15 w
pl2 157 w 157 w 157 w 30 w 30 w

处理器

Aorus 17X的热管用铜而不是铝。
Aorus 17X的热管用铜而不是铝。

这台英特尔酷睿i9-12900HX提供了2个额外的性能核心，相比之下 i9-12900H.再加上8个额外的效率核心，这导致了处理总共24个线程的能力，这在包括多任务在内的高强度任务中变得很明显。

由于只有P核心达到5.0GHz的最大时钟速度，HX芯片在纸面上提供了与i9-12900H相同的性能。 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX在这方面的性能。在Cinebench R15的恒定负载测试中，以及在一般的CPU性能中，它明显领先于AMD芯片。总的来说，i9在原始性能能力方面将大多数竞争对手大大甩在后面，当你考虑到它令人印象深刻的设备时，这并不令人惊讶。拥有6个P核的i9处理器，如i9-12900H，也被甩在后面。

此外，在长期运行中，有一个非常稳定的性能，考虑到高功耗，这也指向了一个非常好的冷却系统设计。在Cinebench R15的第一次运行后，该值在长期运行中甚至没有下降4%。 冷却也代表了Aorus 17 XE4的唯一可见的外部差异。你可以通过风扇通风口看到热管的铜片，而不是由铝制成的黑漆散热片。

我们的 基准列表提供了各种处理器的性能概览。

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

01452904355807258701015116013051450159517401885203021752320246526102755Tooltip
Aorus 17X XES Intel Core i9-12900HX: Ø2729 (2696.14-2830.06)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2569 (2512.4-2719.42)
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø2467 (2423.65-2668.98)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø2247 (2222.47-2257.72)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
 
83.7 pt
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
77.9 pt
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
75.2 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
72.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H
71.6 pt
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
71.3 pt
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H
66.6 pt
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
60.9 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
60.5 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (18337 - 23482, n=8)
22529 Points +23%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
22456 (19998.9min - 22456.2max) Points +22%
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 34613, n=229, last 2 years)
19422 Points +6%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
18337 Points
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H
17161 Points -6%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
16530 Points -10%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H
16034 Points -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
14085 Points -23%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
11814 Points -36%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
1928 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (1897 - 1936, n=8)
1917 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H
1911 Points -1%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1855 Points -4%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
1812 Points -6%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H
1811 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 2235, n=227, last 2 years)
1809 Points -6%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
1765 Points -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1566 Points -19%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (7037 - 9042, n=8)
8602 Points +22%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
8564 Points +22%
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=227, last 2 years)
7383 Points +5%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
7037 Points
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H
6516 Points -7%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
6271 Points -11%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H
6150 Points -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
5489 Points -22%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
4847 Points -31%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
740 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (728 - 745, n=8)
738 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H
737 Points 0%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
717 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=227, last 2 years)
697 Points -6%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H
694 Points -6%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
692 Points -6%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
676 Points -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
595 Points -20%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (2830 - 3652, n=8)
3493 Points +23%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
3383 (3163.31min - 3383.24max) Points +20%
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=231, last 2 years)
3074 Points +9%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
2830 (2696.14min - 2830.06max) Points
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H
2719 (2512.4min - 2719.42max) Points -4%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H
2670 Points -6%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
2669 (2423.65min - 2668.98max) Points -6%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
2580 (2349.9min - 2579.98max) Points -9%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
2518 (1886.88min - 2518.1max) Points -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
2292 Points -19%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (274 - 282, n=8)
278 Points +1%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
276 Points
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H
273 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=230, last 2 years)
268 Points -3%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
267 Points -3%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H
263 Points -5%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
260 Points -6%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
256 Points -7%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
250 Points -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
249 Points -10%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
246 Seconds * -22%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H
234 Seconds * -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
220 Seconds * -9%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
201 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 1259, n=225, last 2 years)
201 Seconds * -0%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
195.9 Seconds * +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H
189.9 Seconds * +6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (144 - 201, n=8)
154.4 Seconds * +23%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
153.1 Seconds * +24%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (69778 - 88128, n=7)
84614 MIPS +21%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
76947 MIPS +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 140932, n=226, last 2 years)
76641 MIPS +10%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
69778 MIPS
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
69083 MIPS -1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H
65743 MIPS -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
64457 MIPS -8%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H
57987 MIPS -17%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
55958 MIPS -20%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
6343 MIPS
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (6165 - 6358, n=7)
6293 MIPS -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 7581, n=226, last 2 years)
6113 MIPS -4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H
6041 MIPS -5%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
5981 MIPS -6%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H
5851 MIPS -8%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
5818 MIPS -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
5727 MIPS -10%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
5624 MIPS -11%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (15116 - 16925, n=8)
16247 Points +7%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
15116 Points
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
14213 Points -6%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
13722 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 22200, n=231, last 2 years)
13504 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H
12261 Points -19%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H
12096 Points -20%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
11626 Points -23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
10167 Points -33%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (1874 - 1949, n=8)
1909 Points 0%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
1902 Points
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1861 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H
1856 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 2193, n=231, last 2 years)
1805 Points -5%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H
1781 Points -6%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
1759 Points -8%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
1749 Points -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1594 Points -16%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (19.6 - 26.6, n=7)
25 fps +28%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
24.9 fps +27%
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 37.6, n=229, last 2 years)
21.1 fps +8%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
19.6 fps
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H
19.1 fps -3%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
18.4 fps -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
18 fps -8%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H
16.3 fps -17%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
14.6 fps -26%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 332, n=223, last 2 years)
49.3 s * -31%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
45 s * -19%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
43.5 s * -15%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
42 s * -11%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H
38.5 s * -2%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
37.7 s *
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (33.6 - 42.4, n=7)
37.4 s * +1%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H
36.4 s * +3%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
36.3 s * +4%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
0.4799 sec * -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 4.47, n=226, last 2 years)
0.4706 sec * -13%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4659 sec * -12%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
0.459 sec * -10%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4534 sec * -9%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
0.4392 sec * -6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H
0.437 sec * -5%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (0.4159 - 0.4242, n=7)
0.4211 sec * -1%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
0.4159 sec *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2830 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
236 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
276 Points
Help
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
 
96.7 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
88.9 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
86.5 pt
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
80.6 pt
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
78 pt
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
73.5 pt
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
63.5 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
60.9 pt
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
53.3 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (11535 - 22183, n=7)
19240 KRay/s +26%
Average of class Gaming
  (3069 - 60169, n=222, last 2 years)
18514 KRay/s +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
16852 KRay/s +10%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
15255 KRay/s
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
15078 KRay/s -1%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
11088 KRay/s -27%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
8573 KRay/s -44%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
8538 KRay/s -44%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
7233 KRay/s -53%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
103794 Points +32%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (52916 - 110093, n=7)
96060 Points +23%
Average of class Gaming
  (18567 - 252486, n=222, last 2 years)
93043 Points +19%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
78356 Points
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
75435 Points -4%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
49654 Points -37%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
38656 Points -51%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
38396 Points -51%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
34372 Points -56%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (3559 - 5123, n=7)
4698 MB/s +32%
Average of class Gaming
  (629 - 10389, n=222, last 2 years)
4297 MB/s +21%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3977 MB/s +12%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3791 MB/s +7%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3559 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3547 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3043 MB/s -14%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2992 MB/s -16%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2525 MB/s -29%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming
  (15371 - 200651, n=222, last 2 years)
108858 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
107024 Points +2%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
105314 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
104920 Points 0%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
104457 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (101029 - 104457, n=7)
102903 Points -1%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
102833 Points -2%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
99702 Points -5%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
91366 Points -13%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
12955 Points +24%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (10475 - 13062, n=7)
12627 Points +21%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
12303 Points +17%
Average of class Gaming
  (2137 - 32988, n=222, last 2 years)
12143 Points +16%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
10475 Points
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9687 Points -8%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9652 Points -8%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9634 Points -8%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
8783 Points -16%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
57334 Points +47%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (31779 - 53628, n=7)
47917 Points +23%
Average of class Gaming
  (10291 - 134044, n=222, last 2 years)
47650 Points +22%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
39016 Points
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
37158 Points -5%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
31771 Points -19%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
23188 Points -41%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
23070 Points -41%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
19904 Points -49%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (125268 - 183146, n=7)
166223 MB/s +23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
139407 MB/s +4%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
136241 MB/s +1%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
134645 MB/s
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
117708 MB/s -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=222, last 2 years)
106724 MB/s -21%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
95195 MB/s -29%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
95126 MB/s -29%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
81335 MB/s -40%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
1351 MB/s +36%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (990 - 1408, n=7)
1336 MB/s +35%
Average of class Gaming
  (150.9 - 2409, n=222, last 2 years)
1202 MB/s +21%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
1056 MB/s +7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
1048 MB/s +6%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
1004 MB/s +1%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
990 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
890 MB/s -10%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
875 MB/s -12%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (6663 - 11913, n=7)
10470 KRay/s +23%
Average of class Gaming
  (1518 - 31796, n=222, last 2 years)
10025 KRay/s +18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9001 KRay/s +6%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
8518 KRay/s
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
7989 KRay/s -6%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
6675 KRay/s -22%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
4940 KRay/s -42%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
4924 KRay/s -42%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
4160 KRay/s -51%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (40239 - 47710, n=7)
42604 MPixel/s +5%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40648 MPixel/s +1%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
40386 MPixel/s
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=223, last 2 years)
36547 MPixel/s -10%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
34944 MPixel/s -13%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
32445 MPixel/s -20%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
29705 MPixel/s -26%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
28692 MPixel/s -29%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
25893 MPixel/s -36%

系统性能

考虑到所使用的处理器，我们几乎期待Aorus 17X在系统性能方面的出色表现。这款笔记本电脑显然能够领先于我们测试的游戏笔记本电脑的平均水平，在某些部分甚至超过了20%。它几乎总是领先于 Aorus 17 XE4这并不十分令人惊讶，因为该系统的处理器性能较低。只有 MSI Raider GE66 12UHS配备了超频的 英特尔酷睿i9-12900HK才能够在整个过程中取得更好的数值。

在几乎每一个应用程序的启动过程中，我们都可以清楚地感受到其性能，而且我们几乎看不到任何延迟。即使并行运行几个应用程序也不会导致任何障碍，这也是由于大而快速的工作存储器的原因。因此，虚拟场景的使用也显得完全现实。

在电池操作下，即强制使用省电模式时，高性能所剩无几，PCMark10的结果只达到最佳值的三分之一。

在Ai Boost模式下的PCMark10
在Ai Boost模式下的PCMark10
省电模式下的PCMark10
省电模式下的PCMark10
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8178 Points +4%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8042 Points +2%
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
7899 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  ()
7899 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
7812 Points -1%
Aorus 17 XE4
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
7700 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=197, last 2 years)
7573 Points -4%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
7357 Points -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
6351 Points -20%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
11078 Points +5%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10919 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
10814 Points +2%
Aorus 17 XE4
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
10765 Points +2%
Average of class Gaming
  (8300 - 12334, n=196, last 2 years)
10708 Points +1%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
10646 Points +1%
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
10589 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  ()
10589 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
9374 Points -11%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10422 Points +2%
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
10237 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  ()
10237 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
10197 Points 0%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10023 Points -2%
Aorus 17 XE4
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
9820 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (7244 - 11833, n=196, last 2 years)
9727 Points -5%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
9279 Points -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
7704 Points -25%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
12897 Points +4%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
12857 Points +4%
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
12342 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  ()
12342 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
11732 Points -5%
Aorus 17 XE4
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
11721 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (6462 - 18475, n=196, last 2 years)
11407 Points -8%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
10938 Points -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
9626 Points -22%
CrossMark / Overall
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2155 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  ()
2155 Points 0%
Aorus 17 XE4
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2000 Points -7%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1973 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2334, n=167, last 2 years)
1876 Points -13%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1833 Points -15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
1711 Points -21%
CrossMark / Productivity
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2030 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  ()
2030 Points 0%
Aorus 17 XE4
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1962 Points -3%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1874 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=167, last 2 years)
1787 Points -12%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1741 Points -14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
1698 Points -16%
CrossMark / Creativity
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2304 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  ()
2304 Points 0%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2089 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2514, n=167, last 2 years)
2040 Points -11%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
2012 Points -13%
Aorus 17 XE4
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1992 Points -14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
1724 Points -25%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Aorus 17 XE4
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2142 Points +1%
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2113 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  ()
2113 Points 0%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1941 Points -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
1715 Points -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=167, last 2 years)
1700 Points -20%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1613 Points -24%
PCMark 10 Score
7899 points
Help
AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (62852 - 70863, n=7)
65526 MB/s +4%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
62959 MB/s 0%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
62852 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 92565, n=222, last 2 years)
59056 MB/s -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
53162 MB/s -15%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
53008 MB/s -16%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
49810 MB/s -21%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
47278 MB/s -25%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
45062 MB/s -28%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
68051 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (62140 - 72930, n=7)
67115 MB/s -1%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
66798 MB/s -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (24879 - 90647, n=222, last 2 years)
62916 MB/s -8%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
59935 MB/s -12%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
57329 MB/s -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
53321 MB/s -22%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
48780 MB/s -28%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
46179 MB/s -32%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65001 MB/s +8%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (60001 - 68782, n=7)
62827 MB/s +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (21619 - 103259, n=222, last 2 years)
61374 MB/s +2%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
60001 MB/s
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
58827 MB/s -2%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
57764 MB/s -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
57180 MB/s -5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
46677 MB/s -22%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
44515 MB/s -26%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
100.8 ns * -16%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
95.7 ns * -10%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
93.7 ns * -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
92.3 ns * -6%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
91.7 ns * -5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
91.2 ns * -5%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (83.9 - 93.4, n=7)
87.9 ns * -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 152.5, n=219, last 2 years)
87.2 ns * -0%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
87 ns *

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

在运行程序时的延迟评估中，这台笔记本电脑无法给我们留下充分印象。为了评估这一点，我们在默认浏览器中打开几个网页，然后以4K分辨率播放Youtube视频并运行Prime95。这导致最大延迟几乎不超过1毫秒。这个数值是有限的，在某些情况下明显低于竞争对手的数值。然而，Aorus 17X XES仍然不适合用它来进行实时音频和视频处理。

4K视频再现给出了坚实但不完美的结果。对处理器的要求不是很高，在完成视频后，总共3500个单帧中只有3个帧被丢掉。

LatencyMon主页面
LatencyMon主页面
LatencyMon驱动程序列表
LatencyMon驱动程序列表
4K的YouTube视频
4K的YouTube视频
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
9988 μs * -796%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5785 μs * -419%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1698.6 μs * -52%
Aorus 17 XE4
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1681 μs * -51%
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1115 μs *
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
903 μs * +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
521.5 μs * +53%

* ... smaller is better

存储解决方案

所使用的技嘉M.2固态硬盘并没有显示出任何弱点。即使在负载测试中，特别是为了显示热量发展是否过高，最大性能也保持不变。PCIe 4.0连接的能力得到了充分的利用。

在其他竞争对手中， Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22显示了事情不应该这样做，因为在很短的时间内已经出现了节流现象。

AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
Sequential Read: 5715MB/s
Sequential Write: 3218MB/s
4K Read: 94.04MB/s
4K Write: 256.3MB/s
4K-64 Read: 2963MB/s
4K-64 Write: 3299MB/s
Access Time Read: 0.085ms
Access Time Write: 0.014ms
Score Read: 3629Points
Score Write: 3877Points
Score Total: 9242Points
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10		HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB		MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR		SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW		MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB		Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)		Aorus 17 XE4
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10		Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
 		Average of class Gaming
 
Drive Performance Rating
Percent
76.7
55.3
-28%
75.9
-1%
73.4
-4%
77.5
1%
76.8
0%
79.3
3%
74.3
-3%
60
-22%
DiskSpd
-25%
3%
-4%
-2%
24%
-6%
-6%
-17%
seq read
3871
3605
-7%
3929
1%
3141
-19%
3813
-1%
4903
27%
3631
-6%
3439 ?(2519 - 4224, n=10)
-11%
3528 ?(1291 - 7045, n=196, last 2 years)
-9%
seq write
4224
3593
-15%
4063
-4%
3391
-20%
3838
-9%
7889
87%
2200
-48%
3133 ?(2200 - 4236, n=10)
-26%
3808 ?(535 - 9307, n=196, last 2 years)
-10%
seq q8 t1 read
6921
6799
-2%
6683
-3%
6766
-2%
5358
-23%
10557
53%
7034
2%
6974 ?(6864 - 7112, n=10)
1%
6357 ?(1983 - 16089, n=196, last 2 years)
-8%
seq q8 t1 write
4852
5199
7%
4985
3%
4993
3%
4951
2%
9830
103%
3611
-26%
4259 ?(3611 - 4999, n=10)
-12%
4779 ?(539 - 14571, n=196, last 2 years)
-2%
4k q1 t1 read
74.1
77
4%
93
26%
67.2
-9%
88.3
19%
73.1
-1%
88.8
20%
75.6 ?(55 - 91, n=10)
2%
67.6 ?(30.6 - 95.9, n=196, last 2 years)
-9%
4k q1 t1 write
319
205
-36%
275
-14%
279
-13%
273
-14%
359
13%
356
12%
324 ?(201 - 391, n=10)
2%
224 ?(66.6 - 421, n=196, last 2 years)
-30%
4k q32 t16 read
3564
1274
-64%
4176
17%
4260
20%
4068
14%
2390
-33%
3582
1%
3521 ?(3318 - 3583, n=10)
-1%
2576 ?(313 - 6172, n=196, last 2 years)
-28%
4k q32 t16 write
3570
553
-85%
3491
-2%
3961
11%
3478
-3%
1542
-57%
3604
1%
3502 ?(2584 - 3667, n=10)
-2%
2147 ?(162.3 - 4869, n=196, last 2 years)
-40%
AS SSD
-25%
-21%
-6%
1%
0%
7%
-1%
-35%
Score Total
9242
5693
-38%
8980
-3%
9047
-2%
8959
-3%
6635
-28%
9279
0%
8549 ?(5636 - 10783, n=10)
-7%
6784 ?(1923 - 13854, n=184, last 2 years)
-27%
Score Read
3629
1898
-48%
3469
-4%
3276
-10%
3341
-8%
2619
-28%
3549
-2%
3256 ?(1805 - 3629, n=10)
-10%
2489 ?(528 - 4721, n=184, last 2 years)
-31%
Score Write
3877
2955
-24%
3799
-2%
4151
7%
3977
3%
2556
-34%
3996
3%
3713 ?(2849 - 5339, n=10)
-4%
3089 ?(515 - 7208, n=184, last 2 years)
-20%
Seq Read
5715
5233.79
-8%
5282.63
-8%
4559
-20%
5098.97
-11%
5344.88
-6%
5031
-12%
5048 ?(4494 - 5715, n=10)
-12%
4937 ?(1759 - 12763, n=184, last 2 years)
-14%
Seq Write
3218
2355.42
-27%
3975.65
24%
3548
10%
3667.77
14%
7663.27
138%
3162
-2%
3202 ?(1891 - 4476, n=10)
0%
3647 ?(495 - 11316, n=184, last 2 years)
13%
4K Read
94.04
68.25
-27%
86.37
-8%
63.1
-33%
84.06
-11%
68.93
-27%
108
15%
90.5 ?(61.3 - 112.1, n=10)
-4%
66.7 ?(30.4 - 112.1, n=184, last 2 years)
-29%
4K Write
256.3
224.32
-12%
240.81
-6%
254.1
-1%
244.47
-5%
328.69
28%
308.6
20%
287 ?(206 - 358, n=10)
12%
210 ?(96.3 - 512, n=184, last 2 years)
-18%
4K-64 Read
2963
1306.59
-56%
2854.25
-4%
2757
-7%
2747.2
-7%
2015.68
-32%
2938
-1%
2660 ?(1285 - 2964, n=10)
-10%
1923 ?(312 - 3475, n=184, last 2 years)
-35%
4K-64 Write
3299
2495.32
-24%
3160.56
-4%
3543
7%
3365.94
2%
1460.96
-56%
3371
2%
3105 ?(2403 - 4533, n=10)
-6%
2517 ?(277 - 5909, n=184, last 2 years)
-24%
Access Time Read *
0.085
0.078
8%
0.029
66%
0.073
14%
0.032
62%
0.053
38%
0.048
44%
0.0632 ?(0.028 - 0.094, n=10)
26%
0.05422 ?(0.016 - 0.379, n=182, last 2 years)
36%
Access Time Write *
0.014
0.017
-21%
0.054
-286%
0.018
-29%
0.018
-29%
0.013
7%
0.013
7%
0.0135 ?(0.011 - 0.018, n=10)
4%
0.04705 ?(0.011 - 1.028, n=184, last 2 years)
-236%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-26% / -25%
-6% / -11%
-5% / -5%
0% / -0%
8% / 10%
1% / 2%
-3% / -3%
-25% / -27%

* ... smaller is better

Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

035070010501400175021002450280031503500385042004550490052505600595063006650Tooltip
Aorus 17X XES Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10: Ø6907 (6282.04-6938.39)
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng WDC PC SN810 1TB: Ø6308 (4668.05-6876.44)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW: Ø5166 (1248.02-6466.22)

图形卡

Aorus 17X提供了NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070 Ti显卡的最大功率为130瓦，其中15瓦可以作为CPU的 "动态提升"。在我们的各种基准测试中，该游戏笔记本电脑的表现接近所使用的GPU的平均值。

在TheWitcher 3 的压力测试中，性能也在较长的时间内保持不变，这表明冷却系统的规模足够大。然而，显而易见的是，配备较小的i7-12700H处理器的Aorus 17 XE4在这里的表现更好。看一眼WiNFO的传感器值，就会发现GPU没有达到相同的性能值，这可能可以追溯到较大的处理器的功率和冷却需求明显较高。这意味着GPU的最高温度达到得更快，导致时钟速度降低。下面两张图表的平均值很好地表明了这一点。

你可以找到更多的基准测试和与各种显卡的比较，在我们的 基准列表.

带有i9-12900HX的Aorus 17X XES
带有i9-12900HX的Aorus 17X XES
配备i7-12700H的Aorus 17 XE4
配备i7-12700H的Aorus 17 XE4
3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
99.7 pt
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800HX
95.9 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
94.5 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
88.8 pt
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
84.7 pt
Aorus 17 XE4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
83 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
 
81.4 pt
Aorus 17X XES
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
79.1 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
78.4 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
42918 Points +34%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800HX
42212 Points +32%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
40435 Points +26%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
40257 Points +26%
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72070, n=229, last 2 years)
40173 Points +26%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
37112 Points +16%
Aorus 17 XE4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
35988 Points +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (13799 - 42569, n=36)
35944 Points +12%
Aorus 17X XES
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
32001 Points
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
182486 Points +20%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800HX
168590 Points +11%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
154082 Points +2%
Aorus 17X XES
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
151618 Points
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
146239 Points -4%
Aorus 17 XE4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
140844 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (15902 - 193851, n=142, last 2 years)
135868 Points -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (33126 - 181005, n=25)
130456 Points -14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
79498 Points -48%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800HX
31096 Points +22%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
30933 Points +21%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
30821 Points +21%
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=233, last 2 years)
29268 Points +15%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
28012 Points +10%
Aorus 17 XE4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
27776 Points +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
27562 Points +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (22612 - 32550, n=37)
27554 Points +8%
Aorus 17X XES
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
25538 Points
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
12838 Points +31%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
12778 Points +30%
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22547, n=231, last 2 years)
11960 Points +22%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800HX
11938 Points +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
11227 Points +14%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
10521 Points +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (8142 - 12324, n=37)
10478 Points +7%
Aorus 17 XE4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
10462 Points +6%
Aorus 17X XES
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
9834 Points
3DMark 11 Performance
29161 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
59273 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
23528 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
10254 points
Help

游戏性能

我们测试的所有游戏都能够保持超过60FPS的帧率，即使在最高的细节设置下也是如此。这意味着Aorus 17X应该能够很好地处理较新和要求较高的游戏，甚至在可预见的未来。在这里，全高清分辨率也为所需的性能提供了一个务实的限制。

正如已经提到的，RTX 3070 Ti无法发挥其全部潜力。的微星GE67 12UGS采用相同的GPU，在某些方面明显领先。技嘉笔记本电脑的重点更在于生产力。

360-Hz面板可能只在一些较简单的游戏中发挥其全部潜力。然而，由于支持可变刷新率，而且响应时间极短，它在每秒100帧或更多的情况下仍能打出不错的数字。

The Witcher 3 | GTA V | Dota 2 Reborn | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | X-Plane 11.11 | Far Cry 5 | Strange Brigade | Forza Horizon 5 | God of War | Elex 2
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
223.3 (204min) fps +41%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
223 fps +41%
Average of class Gaming
  (17.5 - 449, n=165, last 2 years)
218 fps +38%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
210 fps +33%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
204.8 fps +30%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
197.9 (47.7min, 61.4P0.1, 127.7P1) fps +25%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (139.7 - 226, n=27)
188.8 fps +19%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
180 (32.6min, 55P0.1, 121P1) fps +14%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
158 fps
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (8.61 - 216, n=225, last 2 years)
116.1 fps +24%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
112.7 (105min) fps +20%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
112 (94min) fps +20%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
111.1 (30min, 41.5P0.1, 74.7P1) fps +19%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
110 (98min) fps +17%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
103.7 fps +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (76.8 - 124.1, n=39)
102.4 fps +9%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
99.9 (29.7min, 45.7P0.1, 74.1P1) fps +7%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
93.7 (80min) fps
GTA V
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
178.5 (3.24min, 125P1) fps
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
178.1 (3.97min, 142.9P1) fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
177.5 (3.92min, 125P1) fps -1%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
177.3 (2.97min, 111.1P1) fps -1%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
175 (6min, 111P1) fps -2%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
172.6 fps -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (80 - 181.9, n=28)
165.5 fps -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (15.3 - 187.1, n=180, last 2 years)
163.2 fps -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
158.9 (4.88min, 111.1P1) fps -11%
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
122 (6.11min, 90.9P1) fps +10%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
117.5 (5.88min, 83.3P1) fps +6%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
117 (24.8min, 83.3P1) fps +6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
116.6 (6.1min, 76.9P1) fps +5%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
110.9 (6.17min, 76.9P1) fps
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
109.4 fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (44 - 123.9, n=36)
106.7 fps -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.38 - 167.7, n=215, last 2 years)
106.7 fps -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
101.5 (21.1min, 71.4P1) fps -8%
Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 high (2/3)
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
166.9 (139.1min) fps +5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
164.5 (143.9min) fps +4%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
158.3 (135.1min) fps
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
155.3 (136.9min) fps -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.9 - 244, n=234, last 2 years)
151.8 fps -4%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
148.4 (127.8min) fps -6%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
141.2 (124.2min) fps -11%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
147 (130.6min) fps -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (75.4 - 170.2, n=38)
142.8 fps -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
114.8 (99.4min) fps -27%
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
156.8 (134min) fps +6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
155.8 (135.8min) fps +5%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
148 (121.3min) fps
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
147.7 (130.1min) fps 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (26.9 - 220, n=235, last 2 years)
142.1 fps -4%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
140.8 (121min) fps -5%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
134.4 (116.3min) fps -9%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
139 (122.8min) fps -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (68.7 - 160.5, n=38)
135.6 fps -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
111.3 (96.1min) fps -25%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
122.4 fps +29%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
120.2 fps +27%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
119.6 fps +26%
Average of class Gaming
  (9.13 - 194.9, n=225, last 2 years)
110.5 fps +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
108 fps +14%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
102.8 fps +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (49.5 - 122.4, n=35)
98.5 fps +4%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
96.5 fps +2%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
94.7 fps
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
117.5 fps +1%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
116.9 fps
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
115.5 fps -1%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
105.9 fps -9%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
103 fps -12%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
101.6 fps -13%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
91.4 fps -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.4 - 166.2, n=240, last 2 years)
101.2 fps -13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (51.6 - 116.9, n=37)
95.5 fps -18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
78.2 fps -33%
Far Cry 5
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
153 fps +6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
153 (119min) fps +6%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
146 (123min) fps +1%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
144 (123min) fps
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
138 (113min) fps -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 232, n=113, last 2 years)
134.4 fps -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (99 - 147, n=23)
129.6 fps -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
120 (73min) fps -17%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
144 fps +7%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
137 (106min) fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
136 (100min) fps +1%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
135 (112min) fps
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
130 (104min) fps -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (14 - 218, n=123, last 2 years)
125.8 fps -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (91 - 138, n=25)
120.4 fps -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
111 (82min) fps -18%
Strange Brigade
1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
238 (42.8min, 162.5P1) fps +29%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
235 (75.3min, 181.1P1) fps +27%
Average of class Gaming
  (17.5 - 465, n=188, last 2 years)
230 fps +25%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
224 (61.2min, 162.6P1) fps +21%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
214 (73.2min, 156.4P1) fps +16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (112 - 248, n=27)
203 fps +10%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
200 (42.1min, 151P1) fps +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
198.8 (67.5min, 136.8P1) fps +8%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
184.7 (122.1min, 133.5P1) fps
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
207 (84.6min, 149.5P1) fps +27%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
207 (107.5min, 154.2P1) fps +27%
Average of class Gaming
  (14.6 - 421, n=223, last 2 years)
205 fps +26%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
199.8 (41.6min, 145.9P1) fps +22%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
186.4 (71.9min, 139.2P1) fps +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
182.4 (66.8min, 132.6P1) fps +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (109 - 221, n=37)
179.9 fps +10%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
178 (94.9min, 133P1) fps +9%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
163.2 (82.8min, 122.4P1) fps
Forza Horizon 5
1920x1080 High Preset
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
144 fps +11%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
130 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (122 - 130, n=3)
125.3 fps -4%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
124 fps -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 174, n=13, last 2 years)
115 fps -12%
1920x1080 Extreme Preset
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
91 fps +14%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
80 fps
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
79 fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (76 - 80, n=3)
78.3 fps -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 124, n=11, last 2 years)
75.8 fps -5%
God of War
1920x1080 High Preset
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
92 (77min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (76.6 - 92, n=5)
85.1 fps -7%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
84.7 (25.3min, 33.1P0.1, 70.5P1) fps -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.2 - 180, n=24, last 2 years)
82.9 fps -10%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 133, n=24, last 2 years)
62.9 fps +3%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
61 (54min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (55.1 - 64.3, n=5)
60 fps -2%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
59.6 (40.6min, 41.2P0.1, 48.8P1) fps -2%
Elex 2
1920x1080 High / On AA:FX AF:16x
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
96 fps +16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (83 - 99.4, n=3)
90.4 fps +9%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
88.8 (35.6min, 46.8P0.1, 58.4P1) fps +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (36.9 - 118.7, n=14, last 2 years)
84.1 fps +1%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
83 fps
1920x1080 Ultra / On AA:SM AF:16x
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
91 fps +21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (75 - 89, n=3)
81.4 fps +9%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
80.1 (27min, 37.2P0.1, 56.2P1) fps +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.1 - 118.5, n=14, last 2 years)
76.7 fps +2%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
75 fps

除了短暂的下降4%之外，在我们的TheWitcher 3压力测试中，帧率在最大细节上几乎保持不变。这表明，即使在恒定负载下，也有足够的冷却性能。

你可以在图表中以及各种游戏的帧率值中看到 Aorus 17 XE4与相同的显卡和i7-12700H的性能总是好几个百分点。显卡必须与处理器分享太多的资源。然而，这并不改变在适合当前游戏方面的良好总体印象。

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

8595105115Tooltip
Aorus 17X XES i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø92.2 (85-97)
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø110.3 (101-123)
Aorus 17 XE4 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø96.5 (87-103)
low med. high ultra
GTA V (2015) 178.5 110.9
The Witcher 3 (2015) 158 93.7
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 158.3 148
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 94.7
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 116.9
Far Cry 5 (2018) 144 135
Strange Brigade (2018) 184.7 163.2
Forza Horizon 5 (2021) 130 80
God of War (2022) 92 61
Elex 2 (2022) 83 75

排放--Aorus 17X的高冷却需求

噪声排放

当然，风扇在负载下会变得很响。不幸的是，在某些情况下，噪音量大大超过了竞争对手，但你通常也会听到一些呼呼的声音。

真正突出的是风扇转速的突然升高，有时甚至在电池运行时。在常规负载下，如网上冲浪、图像处理和运行办公程序，这就变得很烦人。风扇的转速一直在突然上升。

显然，技嘉已经注意到了这一点会变得多么令人讨厌。Escape "键提供了第二个功能，只要按一下按钮就可以调整风扇的行为，而不需要做任何其他改变。

Noise Level

Idle
28 / 32 / 38 dB(A)
Load
53 / 55 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 26 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs204534.638.239.233.742.32546.83433.535.328.445.73151.144.94247.640.7504043.533.133.237.629.743.95041.54140.941.239.833.1633327.230.526.425.139.18036.528.223.522.12339.310028.724.822.221.619.733.412531.925.32422.218.337.316031.624.724.823.920.936.720033.625.32623.420.636.325034.326.524.822.82236.631535.92624.12219.43940036.725.320.818.916.439.350037.225.321.319.516.439.463038.827.922.218.416.24080038.625.720.115.31340.7100040.726.421.415.512.742.5125042.227.821.414.911.744.1160042.82720.914.611.145.2200042.125.419.114.811.844.725004123.818.917.913.644315041.926.322.713.315.544.54000402415.613.515.142.850004119.31513.914.943.8630043.11815.514.114.845.5800036.515.614.713.913.441.41000031.814.514.113.212.436.81250027.613.913.512.811.9321600020.313.513.21312.825.3SPL52.8373228.226.655.3N8.82.61.71.10.810.6median 37.2median 25.3median 20.9median 15.3median 14.9median 40Delta4.73.44.13.52.63.8hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAorus 17X XES
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10		HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB		MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR		SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW		MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB		Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)		Aorus 17 XE4
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
Noise
6%
15%
-4%
8%
13%
7%
off / environment *
26
25.4
2%
22.7
13%
26
-0%
26
-0%
26
-0%
24
8%
Idle Minimum *
28
28
-0%
22.9
18%
26
7%
27
4%
26
7%
30
-7%
Idle Average *
32
28
12%
22.9
28%
34
-6%
30
6%
27
16%
31
3%
Idle Maximum *
38
31.2
18%
22.9
40%
42
-11%
39
-3%
29
24%
34
11%
Load Average *
53
52.2
2%
44.4
16%
58
-9%
45
15%
41
23%
44
17%
Witcher 3 ultra *
54
52.2
3%
55.7
-3%
57
-6%
45
17%
48
11%
51
6%
Load Maximum *
55
52.2
5%
57.4
-4%
58
-5%
47
15%
50
9%
49
11%

* ... smaller is better

温度

在游戏时，甚至在压力测试期间，游戏笔记本的热量发展并没有变得太极端。掌托保持相对凉爽。键盘区域的热量发展也保持在可接受的范围内，即使按键明显升温。

很大一部分热量是通过底部带走的，它比顶部的温度高几度。我们测得的最大值为65℃（149°F）。这也意味着你不应该在有垫子的表面上使用Aorus 17X，但它最好放在桌子等坚固的表面上。

Max. Load
 46 °C42 °C54 °C 
 42 °C45 °C47 °C 
 34 °C38 °C36 °C 
Maximum: 54 °C
Average: 42.7 °C
58 °C57 °C52 °C
52 °C51 °C45 °C
38 °C38 °C31 °C
Maximum: 58 °C
Average: 46.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  50 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 58 °C / 136 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 45.2 °C / 113 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41 °C / 105.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-12.1 °C / -21.8 F).
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU		HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU		MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU		SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU		MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU		Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU		Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Heat
18%
29%
2%
4%
14%
11%
Maximum Upper Side *
54
31.3
42%
34.4
36%
56
-4%
54
-0%
45
17%
50
7%
Maximum Bottom *
58
43.3
25%
42
28%
60
-3%
65
-12%
50
14%
58
-0%
Idle Upper Side *
37
31.3
15%
24
35%
34
8%
30
19%
33
11%
30
19%
Idle Bottom *
39
43.3
-11%
33.2
15%
36
8%
35
10%
33
15%
32
18%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

在恒定的负载下，i9-12900HX最高达到100℃（212°F）。在这之后，Aorus 17X总是不得不大幅节制其时钟速度。然而，只有在显卡也处于重载的情况下才会出现这种情况。在《Witcher 3 》的最大细节设置下，这个场景显示得很好，揭示了耗电的CPU的极高热量发展。

压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3

发言人

通过观察下面的条形图，你可以立即看到，这款笔记本电脑缺乏低音。MacBook Pro 16显示了这应该是什么样子的。不幸的是，你可以清楚地听到电子或摇滚等相应音乐的差异。深层频率明显缺乏力量。

相比之下，声音和一般的高频都被清晰准确地再现出来。强调声音的音乐和所有以声音和对话为主的内容听起来都很有说服力。对于笔记本电脑的立体声扬声器来说，这是一个很好的结果。

由于有耳机端口和各种视频端口，有许多额外的选项可用于外部扬声器。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.743.72528.436.13140.748.34029.735.95039.841.36325.133.880233010019.725.512518.32816020.936.920020.6442502254.131519.459.340016.461.850016.465.963016.271.58001369.1100012.775.1125011.776.1160011.175.4200011.876.7250013.670.9315015.566.9400015.168.7500014.974630014.874.9800013.473.21000012.470.11250011.968.91600012.862.4SPL26.685.2N0.862.5median 14.9median 68.9Delta2.69.226.325.821.422.12624.925.127.622.532.523.448.72655.818.860.922.167.2267019.372.317.674.217.774.319.575.31571.711.871.311.27410.574.21072.710.17210.67210.97511.374.811.671.71269.71269.612.371.112.669.61270.111.269.824.784.70.666.6median 12median 71.73.42.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAorus 17X XESApple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Aorus 17X XES audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 一个耗电的17英寸笔记本电脑

消耗功率

就像其他配置相当、功能强大的游戏笔记本一样，即使没有负载，功耗也已经非常高了。虽然最低18瓦是可以接受的，但如果你考虑到根本没有运行的应用程序，这似乎还是太高了。

超过150瓦的平均负载消耗量明显高于竞争对手的水平。仅i9-12900HX的消耗就比弱小的CPU多出10瓦。然而，这些功率并没有真正得到有效利用。在我们的TheWitcher 3压力测试中，Aorus 17 XE4做得更好，为此也少用了10%的功率。

在最高消耗290瓦的情况下，280瓦的电源仍然能够处理。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 /  Watt
Idledarkmidlight 18 / 28 / 36 Watt
Load midlight 153 / 290 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Aorus 17X XES
i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU		HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU		SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU		MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU		Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU		Aorus 17 XE4
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU		Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
 		Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
24%
21%
21%
14%
12%
22%
25%
Idle Minimum *
18
12.2
32%
13
28%
16
11%
19
-6%
20
-11%
14.2 ?(4 - 34.6, n=27)
21%
13.7 ?(2 - 64, n=178, last 2 years)
24%
Idle Average *
28
18
36%
17
39%
19
32%
24
14%
23
18%
19.9 ?(8.9 - 43, n=27)
29%
19.1 ?(8 - 67, n=178, last 2 years)
32%
Idle Maximum *
36
19.4
46%
26
28%
26
28%
31
14%
28
22%
26.2 ?(14.3 - 47.3, n=27)
27%
26.8 ?(9 - 101.1, n=178, last 2 years)
26%
Load Average *
153
128
16%
120
22%
110
28%
104
32%
120
22%
125.8 ?(87.2 - 202, n=27)
18%
110.9 ?(32.1 - 202, n=178, last 2 years)
28%
Witcher 3 ultra *
221
209
5%
221
-0%
202
9%
186.5
16%
196
11%
Load Maximum *
290
266
8%
266
8%
242
17%
256
12%
257
11%
248 ?(160 - 319, n=27)
14%
250 ?(64.5 - 418, n=177, last 2 years)
14%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240Tooltip
Aorus 17X XES; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø221 (214-242)
Aorus 17X XES; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø200 (186.7-237)

Power Consumption With External Monitor

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225Tooltip
Aorus 17X XES; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø139.4 (134.3-164.4)
Aorus 17X XES; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø177.1 (166.7-232)
Aorus 17X XES; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø209 (203-214)
Aorus 17X XES; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø213 (206-234)

电池寿命

这并不奇怪，在与Aorus 17 XE4相同的电池容量下，Aorus 17X中更耗电的处理器导致了更差的电池寿命。 特别是在网上冲浪时，尽管系统上几乎没有任何值得一提的负载，但笔记本的表现却令人难以信服。你几乎没有超过4小时的时间再去寻找另一个插座。尽管有省电模式和有限的亮度，但结果仍然低于平均水平，尽管电池储存了近100Wh。

这台笔记本电脑根本不是为电池工作而设计的，所以你应该总是把电源放在伸手可及的地方，尽管它绝不是小的。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
4h 26min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
4h 9min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
3h 46min
Gaming
0h 00min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 26min
Aorus 17X XES
i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh		HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 78 Wh		MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh		SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 E22
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 80 Wh		Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh		Aorus 17 XE4
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh		Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
46%
38%
25%
65%
29%
38%
H.264
226
273
21%
559
147%
366
62%
399 ?(56 - 747, n=91, last 2 years)
77%
WiFi v1.3
266
371
39%
336
26%
408
53%
469
76%
308
16%
368 ?(57 - 745, n=181, last 2 years)
38%
Load
86
131
52%
128
49%
88
2%
62
-28%
94
9%
84.2 ?(36 - 173, n=143, last 2 years)
-2%

Pros

+ 非常强大的处理器
+ 360赫兹面板
+ 大型DDR5内存
+ 免费的SSD插槽
+ 雷电4
+ 三个视频端口

Cons

- 显示屏亮度低
- 声音很大，很热
- 风扇控制不理想
- USB-A连接速度慢
- 图形性能不理想

结论 - 使用技嘉笔记本电脑进行游戏和工作

Aorus 17X XES，测试装置由德国Gigabyte提供。
Aorus 17X XES，测试装置由德国Gigabyte提供。

Aorus 17X XES的核心和亮点是其处理器。有了i9-12900HX，这款笔记本电脑在CPU基准测试中遥遥领先，在高要求的任务中具有令人信服的性能，它也可以很容易地并行运行。 大量的DDR5内存和快速而有能力的M.2 SSD强调了在系统性能方面的高远目标。

尽管有360赫兹的全sRGB色彩空间覆盖的显示器和Nvidia Advanced Optimus的相应快速显示，但这绝不是一台纯粹的游戏笔记本电脑。在办公桌上的合适位置，有一到三个合适的屏幕连接到其视频端口，它也能够证明其工作站的品质。

除其他外，32GB的工作内存非常适用于此。此外，处理器似乎太强大了，而且太需要冷却，无法充分利用显卡的性能，这在游戏时可能成为一个相当大的障碍。

Aorus 17X并不是一台纯粹的游戏笔记本电脑，它同样可以胜任苛刻的任务和偶尔的高水平游戏。

这并不奇怪，这款笔记本电脑在电池寿命、噪音和热量发展方面变得相当弱。强大的组件要求在移动性方面做出明显的妥协。然而，考虑到非常大的电池，我们仍然期待更多。

连接设备也可以变得更丰富一些。17英寸的笔记本电脑肯定会提供足够的空间。此外，两个USB-A连接仍然使用USB 3.0标准，只有5Gbit/s。另一方面，Thunderbolt 4、2.5-Gigbit LAN，以及HDMI和DP多少弥补了这一点。

但当然，这并不能改变良好的系统性能。如果一台笔记本电脑应该工作得非常快，而且还能以最佳质量显示游戏，这里就有了一切。但如果游戏应该是在前台，那么Aorus 17 XE4可能是一个更好的选择。较小的处理器明显降低了价格，但没有限制游戏期间的性能。你可以找到一个更高的系统性能，但价格也相应较高。 MSI Raider GE66，比如说。

价格和可用性

Aorus 17X的上市价格为Gigabyte，而类似的Aorus 17配置与英特尔i9-12900H处理器在BestBuy，售价2999美元。.你可以找到配备i7-12700H的Aorus 17 XE4，它在纯游戏性能方面表现更好，在亚马逊售价1999美元。.

Aorus 17X XES - 08/17/2022 v7
Mario Petzold

Chassis
76 / 98 → 78%
Keyboard
81%
Pointing Device
86%
Connectivity
64 / 80 → 80%
Weight
58 / 10-66 → 86%
Battery
57 / 95 → 60%
Display
83%
Games Performance
98%
Application Performance
98%
Temperature
72 / 95 → 76%
Noise
59 / 90 → 66%
Audio
80%
Camera
37 / 85 → 43%
Average
73%
84%
Gaming - Weighted Average

More articles related to this device

Aorus 17X XES (17X Series)
Review
•
Aorus 17X AZF回顾：带有i9-13900HX和R...

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Aorus 17X XES回顾。配备i9-12900HX的游戏笔记本提供顶级性能
Mario Petzold, 2022-08-18 (Update: 2022-08-18)