Notebookcheck Logo

Aorus X7 v7 (7820HK, GTX 1070, QHD) 笔记本电脑简短评测

优秀的游戏设备。 Aorus X7 v7带来了许多优化。除了配备了令人振奋的NVMe固态硬盘，它还具有优秀的游戏性能，QHD显示屏幕，可升级的性能，以及中央处理器、图形处理器的超频功能。
Gaming Geforce Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Windows
Aorus X7 v7 (X7 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-7820HK 4 x 2.9 - 3.9 GHz, Kaby Lake
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1443 MHz, RAM: 8000 MHz, 256-bit GDDR5, ForceWare 384.94, no Optimus
Memory
16 GB 
, DDR4-2400, dual-channel, four slots (two used)
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 170 PPI, AU Optronics B173QTN01.4 (AUO1496), TN LED, G-Sync, 120 Hz, QHD, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel HM175
Storage
Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL, 256 GB 
, + HGST HTS721010A9E630 (1 TB, 7200 rpm)
Soundcard
Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: microphone, headphone, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC, Brightness Sensor, TPM 2.0
Networking
Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 25 x 428 x 305
Battery
94 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Additional features
Speakers: two speakers two subwoofers, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 230 W charger, Cyberlink PowerDVD 12, MS Office (trial), 24 Months Warranty
Weight
3.4 kg, Power Supply: 774 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

❌
428 mm 334 mm 53 mm 4.5 kg423 mm 322 mm 40 mm 4.3 kg423 mm 304 mm 33 mm 3.8 kg428 mm 305 mm 25 mm 3.4 kg418 mm 296 mm 31 mm 3.4 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Aorus X7 v7
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
196 MB/s
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
79 MB/s -60%
Gigabyte P57X v7
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78.2 MB/s -60%
Aorus X7 v6
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78 MB/s -60%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78 MB/s -60%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76 MB/s -61%
MSI GS73VR 7RF
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
25.9 MB/s -87%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Aorus X7 v7
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
247 MB/s
Gigabyte P57X v7
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
90.4 MB/s -63%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
89 MB/s -64%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
88 MB/s -64%
Aorus X7 v6
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s -65%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s -65%
MSI GS73VR 7RF
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27.1 MB/s -89%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
624 MBit/s +25%
MSI GS73VR 7RF
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
563 MBit/s +13%
Aorus X7 v6
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
554 MBit/s +11%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
512 MBit/s +3%
Aorus X7 v7
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
498 MBit/s
HP Omen 17-an014ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
443 MBit/s -11%
iperf3 receive AX12
HP Omen 17-an014ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
702 MBit/s +45%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
694 MBit/s +43%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
681 MBit/s +40%
MSI GS73VR 7RF
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
640 MBit/s +32%
Aorus X7 v6
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
496 MBit/s +2%
Aorus X7 v7
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
485 MBit/s
346
cd/m²		377
cd/m²		361
cd/m²
357
cd/m²		375
cd/m²		370
cd/m²
322
cd/m²		320
cd/m²		345
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AU Optronics B173QTN01.4 (AUO1496) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 377 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 352.6 cd/m² Minimum: 18 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 375 cd/m²
Contrast: 647:1 (Black: 0.58 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 6.06 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 5.68 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
87% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
87.1% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
63% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.3
CCT: 7998 K
Aorus X7 v7
AU Optronics B173QTN01.4 (AUO1496), 2560x1440, 17.3"		Aorus X7 v6
B173QTN01.0 (AUO1096), 2560x1440, 17.3"		HP Omen 17-an014ng
AUO149D, 1920x1080, 17.3"		Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), 3840x2160, 17.3"		Asus G752VS-BA338T
AU Optronics B173HAN01.1 (AUO119D), 1920x1080, 17.3"		Gigabyte P57X v7
SHP145E, 3840x2160, 17.3"		MSI GS73VR 7RF
AU Optronics AUO109B, 3840x2160, 17.3"
Display
-3%
5%
36%
0%
36%
6%
Display P3 Coverage (%)
63
60.9
-3%
64.6
3%
86.4
37%
61.6
-2%
87.8
39%
64.2
2%
sRGB Coverage (%)
87.1
84.2
-3%
92.9
7%
99.9
15%
90.3
4%
100
15%
96.8
11%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%)
63.7
61.2
-4%
66.1
4%
99.1
56%
62.8
-1%
98.9
55%
66.4
4%
Response Times
-48%
-248%
-218%
-192%
-406%
-196%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms)
24 ?(14, 10)
31 ?(11, 20)
-29%
45.2 ?(20.8, 24.4)
-88%
50 ?(24.4, 25.6)
-108%
36 ?(18, 18)
-50%
55.6 ?(18.4, 37.2)
-132%
38 ?(19.6, 18.4)
-58%
Response Time Black / White * (ms)
6 ?(4, 2)
10 ?(3, 7)
-67%
30.4 ?(16.4, 14)
-407%
25.6 ?(11.2, 14.4)
-327%
26 ?(14.4, 11.6)
-333%
46.8 ?(10.4, 36.4)
-680%
26 ?(16, 10)
-333%
PWM Frequency (Hz)
1000 ?(29)
Screen
-7%
20%
28%
5%
23%
16%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)
375
343
-9%
314
-16%
343
-9%
307
-18%
441.3
18%
371.1
-1%
Brightness (cd/m²)
353
312
-12%
309
-12%
328
-7%
300
-15%
408
16%
343
-3%
Brightness Distribution (%)
85
80
-6%
88
4%
84
-1%
88
4%
86
1%
86
1%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
0.58
0.5
14%
0.34
41%
0.29
50%
0.32
45%
0.44
24%
0.42
28%
Contrast (:1)
647
686
6%
924
43%
1183
83%
959
48%
1003
55%
884
37%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
6.06
7.33
-21%
3.19
47%
4.01
34%
5.53
9%
5.1
16%
4.5
26%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
10.54
10.79
-2%
6.1
42%
6.03
43%
11.54
-9%
9.8
7%
9.7
8%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.68
7.6
-34%
3.49
39%
4.7
17%
7
-23%
4.3
24%
3.1
45%
Gamma
2.3 96%
2.19 100%
2.34 94%
2.4 92%
2.48 89%
2.08 106%
2.17 101%
CCT
7998 81%
9024 72%
7261 90%
6451 101%
8103 80%
7345 88%
7120 91%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) (%)
57
55
-4%
60
5%
88
54%
58
2%
87
53%
61
7%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) (%)
87
84
-3%
93
7%
100
15%
90
3%
100
15%
97
11%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-19% / -12%
-74% / -19%
-51% / -3%
-62% / -22%
-116% / -32%
-58% / -14%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8156 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms).
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
LatencyMon
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
12814
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
23763
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
6252
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
74.9 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
8.71 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.85 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
127.3 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
793 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
166 Points
Help
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | Geekbench 3 | Geekbench 4.0 | Geekbench 4.4 | JetStream 1.1
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
171 Points +3%
Aorus X7 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
170 Points +2%
Aorus X7 v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
166 Points
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
161 Points -3%
MSI GS73VR 7RF
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
160 Points -4%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
157 Points -5%
Gigabyte P57X v7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
152 Points -8%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
144 Points -13%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
867 Points +9%
Aorus X7 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
807 Points +2%
Aorus X7 v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
793 Points
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
742 Points -6%
Gigabyte P57X v7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
736 Points -7%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
735 Points -7%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
732 Points -8%
MSI GS73VR 7RF
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
732 Points -8%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Multi 64Bit
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
9.53 Points +9%
Aorus X7 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
8.88 Points +2%
Aorus X7 v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
8.71 Points
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.19 Points -6%
MSI GS73VR 7RF
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.18 Points -6%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.09 Points -7%
Gigabyte P57X v7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.04 Points -8%
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus X7 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
1.93 Points +4%
Aorus X7 v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.85 Points
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.83 Points -1%
MSI GS73VR 7RF
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.82 Points -2%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.81 Points -2%
Gigabyte P57X v7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.71 Points -8%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.69 Points -9%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
26081 Points +10%
Aorus X7 v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
23763 Points
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
22434 Points -6%
Rendering Single 32Bit
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
6566 Points +5%
Aorus X7 v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
6252 Points
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5923 Points -5%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Aorus X7 v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
16465 Points
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
13984 Points -15%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Aorus X7 v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
4361 Points
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
3804 Points -13%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Aorus X7 v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
15575 Points
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
14053 Points -10%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Aorus X7 v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
4942 Points
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
4603 Points -7%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Aorus X7 v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
16165 Points
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
14767 Points -9%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Aorus X7 v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
4841 Points
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
4777 Points -1%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Aorus X7 v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
283.1 Points
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
270 Points -5%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
221.5 Points -22%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
51.6 Points -82%
PCMark 7 Score
6874 points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5101 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
8196 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5287 points
PCMark 10 Score
5689 points
Help
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus G752VS-BA338T
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5103 Points 0%
Aorus X7 v7
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
5101 Points
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
5064 Points -1%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4989 Points -2%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
4395 Points -14%
MSI GS73VR 7RF
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
3581 Points -30%
Gigabyte P57X v7
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
3569 Points -30%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus G752VS-BA338T
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5410 Points +2%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5289 Points 0%
Aorus X7 v7
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
5287 Points
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
5088 Points -4%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
4541 Points -14%
MSI GS73VR 7RF
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
4259 Points -19%
Gigabyte P57X v7
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
4218 Points -20%
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
AS SSD
hddimg
Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
Sequential Read: 2263 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1504 MB/s
512K Read: 446.9 MB/s
512K Write: 1312 MB/s
4K Read: 54 MB/s
4K Write: 148.2 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 636 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 539 MB/s
Aorus X7 v7
Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL		HP Omen 17-an014ng
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP		Asus G752VS-BA338T
Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e		Gigabyte P57X v7
Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)		Aorus X7 v6
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7		Alienware 17 R4
SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
7%
6%
-58%
7%
-11%
Read Seq (MB/s)
2263
1736
-23%
2791
23%
517
-77%
1499
-34%
1277
-44%
Write Seq (MB/s)
1504
1212
-19%
1596
6%
305.7
-80%
1411
-6%
786
-48%
Read 512 (MB/s)
446.9
1044
134%
400.8
-10%
315
-30%
966
116%
894
100%
Write 512 (MB/s)
1312
854
-35%
1606
22%
306.1
-77%
1103
-16%
659
-50%
Read 4k (MB/s)
54
59.1
9%
55.1
2%
26.04
-52%
44.33
-18%
38.11
-29%
Write 4k (MB/s)
148.2
144.9
-2%
163.8
11%
82.3
-44%
155.5
5%
128.5
-13%
Read 4k QD32 (MB/s)
636
582
-8%
607
-5%
281.3
-56%
696
9%
628
-1%
Write 4k QD32 (MB/s)
539
523
-3%
527
-2%
296
-45%
531
-1%
531
-1%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
32277 points
3DMark 11 Performance
17201 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
160287 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
29794 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
14272 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
7679 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
5529 points
Help
3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Alienware 17 R4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
26438 Points +19%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
24349 Points +10%
Aorus X7 v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
23591 Points +6%
Gigabyte P57X v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
23243 Points +5%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
22510 Points +1%
Aorus X7 v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
22190 Points
HP Omen 17-an014ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
21918 Points -1%
MSI GS73VR 7RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
14666 Points -34%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Alienware 17 R4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
132575 Points +13%
Aorus X7 v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
116901 Points
HP Omen 17-an014ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
108657 Points -7%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
101587 Points -13%
Aorus X7 v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
101012 Points -14%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
94246 Points -19%
Gigabyte P57X v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
75190 Points -36%
MSI GS73VR 7RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
46269 Points -60%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Alienware 17 R4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
21846 Points +25%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
18346 Points +5%
Aorus X7 v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
17433 Points
HP Omen 17-an014ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
17289 Points -1%
Gigabyte P57X v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
17170 Points -2%
Aorus X7 v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
17068 Points -2%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
16847 Points -3%
MSI GS73VR 7RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
11384 Points -35%
012345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
CPU and GPU stay comparatively cool.
CPU and GPU stay comparatively cool.
The GPU's performance drops ever so slightly over time.
The GPU's performance drops ever so slightly over time.
lowmed.highultra
Tomb Raider (2013) 506 433.6 358.2 189.9
BioShock Infinite (2013) 288.3 255.8 243.8 145.8
The Witcher 3 (2015) 249.7 191 119 61.3
Resident Evil 7 (2017) 517 305.4 162.7 133.8
Prey (2017) 143.4 142.9 140.5 139
Rocket League (2017) 249.8 249.8 219.5
Dirt 4 (2017) 323.1 230 152.8 82.2
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017) 130 130.5 106.7 78.6
The Witcher 3 | BioShock Infinite | Prey
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK
78.1 fps +27%
Aorus X7 v7
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK
61.3 fps
Asus G752VS-BA338T
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
59.6 fps -3%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
59.4 fps -3%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
58 fps -5%
MSI GS73VR 7RF
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
41 fps -33%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK
162.9 fps +12%
Aorus X7 v7
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK
145.8 fps
Asus G752VS-BA338T
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
139.4 fps -4%
MSI GS73VR 7RF
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
134 fps -8%
Gigabyte P57X v7
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
130 fps -11%
Prey - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:2TX SM AF:16x
Aorus X7 v7
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK
139 fps
Asus G752VS-BA338T
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
132.5 fps -5%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
129 fps -7%

Noise level

Idle
33 / 36 / 41 dB(A)
HDD
34 dB(A)
Load
41 / 52 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Aorus X7 v7
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile		Aorus X7 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile		HP Omen 17-an014ng
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile		Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile		Asus G752VS-BA338T
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile		Gigabyte P57X v7
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile		Alienware 17 R4
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Noise
-1%
-1%
2%
5%
6%
-3%
off / environment * (dB)
30
30
-0%
30
-0%
31
-3%
30
-0%
29
3%
28.2
6%
Idle Minimum * (dB)
33
33
-0%
30
9%
32
3%
30
9%
30.4
8%
35.6
-8%
Idle Average * (dB)
36
35
3%
37
-3%
35
3%
32
11%
32.1
11%
35.6
1%
Idle Maximum * (dB)
41
40
2%
39
5%
38
7%
36
12%
32.1
22%
35.7
13%
Load Average * (dB)
41
43
-5%
44
-7%
42
-2%
43
-5%
45.6
-11%
50.2
-22%
Witcher 3 ultra * (dB)
45
47
-4%
44
2%
43
4%
50.2
-12%
Load Maximum * (dB)
52
54
-4%
55
-6%
50
4%
49
6%
51.5
1%
50.2
3%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 50 °C51 °C50 °C 
 47 °C49 °C48 °C 
 41 °C43 °C42 °C 
Maximum: 51 °C
Average: 46.8 °C
61 °C60 °C54 °C
64 °C64 °C53 °C
44 °C44 °C43 °C
Maximum: 64 °C
Average: 54.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  55 °C | Room Temperature 24 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 64 °C / 147 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 43.4 °C / 110 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 43 °C / 109.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-14.1 °C / -25.4 F).
Aorus X7 v7
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile		Aorus X7 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile		HP Omen 17-an014ng
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile		Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile		Asus G752VS-BA338T
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile		Gigabyte P57X v7
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile		Alienware 17 R4
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Heat
12%
1%
23%
22%
9%
9%
Maximum Upper Side * (°C)
51
47.5
7%
48
6%
39.1
23%
41
20%
51.2
-0%
49.6
3%
Maximum Bottom * (°C)
64
54.5
15%
54
16%
42.1
34%
39.3
39%
56.8
11%
56
12%
Idle Upper Side * (°C)
33
28.6
13%
35
-6%
27.9
15%
28.8
13%
29.2
12%
29.6
10%
Idle Bottom * (°C)
33
28.8
13%
37
-12%
26.1
21%
27.3
17%
29.2
12%
29.2
12%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.337.92533.7323129.2294028.8285026.426.66327.931.58026.842.610025.754.912524.654.216023.850.120023.657.525022.759.331522.162.740021.266.950020.866.863019.7668001966.6100018.571.8125017.974.2160017.773.4200017.770.2250017.771.2315017.670.3400017.562.5500017.564.2630017.466.4800017.461.41000017.5541250017.557.61600017.354.5SPL30.481.5N1.450.8median 17.9median 64.2Delta1.66.439.338.635.637.135.434.334.334.13232.131.931.531.231.330.531.129.529.62938.228.449.62856.927.756.926.356.625.856.52561.625.859.225.161.824.972.324.670.124.371.323.968.223.666.823.775.423.771.723.569.923.470.123.36623.464.823.560.636.6822.849.5median 24.9median 61.81.58.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAorus X7 v7MSI GS73VR 7RF
Aorus X7 v7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

MSI GS73VR 7RF audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 92% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.6 / 1.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 27 / 33 / 40 Watt
Load midlight 107 / 259 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Aorus X7 v7
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile		Aorus X7 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile		HP Omen 17-an014ng
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile		Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile		Asus G752VS-BA338T
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile		Gigabyte P57X v7
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile		Alienware 17 R4
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Power Consumption
0%
16%
8%
19%
10%
-11%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)
27
29
-7%
22
19%
23
15%
21
22%
15.7
42%
37.5
-39%
Idle Average * (Watt)
33
31
6%
28
15%
33
-0%
27
18%
23.4
29%
37.6
-14%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)
40
38
5%
35
12%
40
-0%
32
20%
23.5
41%
37.6
6%
Load Average * (Watt)
107
111
-4%
93
13%
94
12%
86
20%
184.6
-73%
122.4
-14%
Witcher 3 ultra * (Watt)
190
157
17%
177
7%
165
13%
180.3
5%
Load Maximum * (Watt)
259
253
2%
208
20%
228
12%
206
20%
233.1
10%
277.4
-7%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
3h 41min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 40)
3h 00min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
2h 45min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 21min
Aorus X7 v7
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 94 Wh		HP Omen 17-an014ng
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 86 Wh		Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 88 Wh		Asus G752VS-BA338T
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 90 Wh		Gigabyte P57X v7
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 75.81 Wh		MSI GS73VR 7RF
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 65 Wh		Aorus X7 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 94 Wh		Alienware 17 R4
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 99 Wh
Battery runtime
40%
24%
58%
6%
-4%
0%
3%
Reader / Idle (h)
3.7
5.8
57%
5.4
46%
7.4
100%
4.3
16%
5
35%
4.6
24%
H.264 (h)
2.8
4.3
54%
4.3
54%
WiFi v1.3 (h)
3
4.5
50%
3.6
20%
4.9
63%
2.6
-13%
2.7
-10%
3
0%
3
0%
Load (h)
1.4
1.4
0%
1.5
7%
1.6
14%
1.6
14%
0.9
-36%
1.2
-14%

Pros

+ 120赫兹的哑光面板
+ NVMe 固态硬盘
+ 两个M.2-2280插槽
+ 强大游戏性能
+ 四个运行内存插槽
+ G-Sync
+ CPU / GPU超频功能
+ 雷电3
+ 快速读卡器

Cons

- 视角不佳
- 对比度差
- 3D应用程序下，系统噪声大
- 压感明显的表面
- 电池续航不佳
- 高价
Aorus X7 v7. Review unit courtesy of Gigabyte.
Aorus X7 v7. Review unit courtesy of Gigabyte.

外观上，Aorus X7 v7似乎与其前代产品非常相似。更新和改进大多都存在于内部，例如，更新更快的SD卡读卡器，新的端口排列方式，新的雷电3.0端口或附加的USB Type-A端口。此外，新型号还具有额外的M.2-2280插槽，现在可以同时使用两个NVMe 固态硬盘。

Aorus X7 v7是一款制作精良的游戏笔记本，价格高昂，却还是有些缺点。

第七代Aorus配备了第七代的四核 酷睿i7-7820HK 处理器, 对比前代有了些许的性能加强。与此同时，当配合Kaby Lake 四核时，GeForce GTX 1070 的性能足以流畅地运行市面上的大部分游戏，即便是在超高清画质之下。由于英伟达的 G-Sync技术，刷新率也达到了屏幕对应的120赫兹。

NVMe 固态硬盘确保了系统的顺畅运行，2.5英寸1 TB的机械硬盘提供了大量的游戏存储空间。这些配件的更换和升级都非常容易。当然，在这种情况下，还是需要打开底盖，因为不具备维护舱口。

我们特别喜欢该哑光QHD显示屏幕的高亮度。但是，它的较低的对比度，较差的视角和相对较低的色彩空间覆盖等其他方面，却令人失望。在这个价格范围内，我们期望设备能更好。而X7 v7的4K屏幕机型至少应该满足用户对宽广视角的需求。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Aorus X7 v7 - 08/14/2017 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck

Chassis
82 / 98 → 83%
Keyboard
87%
Pointing Device
81%
Connectivity
67 / 81 → 83%
Weight
54 / 10-66 → 78%
Battery
68%
Display
84%
Games Performance
97%
Application Performance
98%
Temperature
73 / 95 → 77%
Noise
64 / 90 → 71%
Audio
70%
Average
77%
85%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Aorus X7 v7 (7820HK, GTX 1070, QHD) 笔记本电脑简短评测
Sascha Mölck, 2017-09-25 (Update: 2017-09-25)