惠普Pavilion Plus 16 评论:配备 RTX 4050 的高级多媒体笔记本电脑
惠普最近推出了两款新的Pavilion Plus 机型,作为 Envy 系列更经济实惠的替代产品。我们曾评测过Pavilion Plus 14 的两个版本 英特尔猛禽湖和 AMD Zen 4和 AMD Zen 4 两款机型。现在,我们来看看更大的Pavilion Plus 16。
Pavilion Plus 16 放弃了Pavilion Plus 14 的 "IMAX 增强 "OLED 面板,转而提供 H 系列处理器和可选的 Nvidia 显卡。
我们的Pavilion Plus 16 配备了 英特尔酷睿 i7-13700H处理器、16 GB 内存、1 TB SSD 和 16 英寸 2560 x 1600 120 Hz IPS 显示屏。Pavilion Plus 16 是少数配备了 英伟达GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB 笔记本电脑 GPU.该配置在惠普印度官方商城的售价为 1,24,999 ₹(1,350 美元)。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88.7 % | 02/2024 | HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 19.9 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
88.2 % | 01/2024 | SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | 1.3 kg | 16.6 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
87.1 % | 08/2023 | Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.2 kg | 19.95 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
85.6 % | 08/2023 | Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 1.4 kg | 18.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
89.2 % | 04/2023 | Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 R7 7735HS, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | 1.6 kg | 15.6 mm | 14.50" | 2560x1600 | |
87.6 % | 11/2023 | Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 19 mm | 16.00" | 3200x2000 | |
89.4 % | 04/2023 | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 1.8 kg | 16.5 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
底盘坚固的全金属结构
与Pavilion Plus 14 相似,Pavilion Plus 16 的 A、C 和 D 盖采用了自然银色金属结构,而盖子则由铝制成。
整体制造质量几乎无可挑剔。我们没有注意到盖子或键盘面板有任何特别的弯曲。
惠普宣传的屏占比为 89.74%,但实际测量值为 83%。这款笔记本电脑的重量为 1.9 千克,与其他流行的 16 英寸多媒体笔记本电脑相仿。
连接性稳定的无线局域网吞吐量
Pavilion Plus 16 提供了丰富的端口选择,包括 USB Type-A 和 USB Type-C 端口,其中包括 Thunderbolt 4。
端口的位置很好,不会妨碍相邻外设的连接,但其中一个 Type-C 端口本可以放在左侧,这样分布会更均匀。
交流
Pavilion Plus 16 在 5 GHz 频段的 iPerf3 性能比我们观察到的华硕 VivoBook Pro 16 稍微慢一些。 华硕 VivoBook Pro 16采用相同英特尔 Wi-Fi 6E AX211 无线局域网卡的华硕 VivoBook Pro 16 稍微慢一些。
Pavilion 弥补了 VivoBook Pro 16 在 6 GHz 接收性能上的不足,但差距不大。
iPerf3 在 5 GHz 和 6 GHz 频段的性能相当稳定,没有出现任何故障,这与我们在联想超薄 Pro 7 上看到的情况不同。 联想超薄 Pro 7采用联发科 Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 芯片的情况不同。
Networking / iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (358 - 1735, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (464 - 1861, n=188) |
Networking / iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (701 - 1789, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (582 - 1890, n=188) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 |
Networking / iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Average of class Multimedia (944 - 1822, n=39, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (632 - 1851, n=174) |
Networking / iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (883 - 1857, n=173) | |
Average of class Multimedia (920 - 1803, n=39, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 |
网络摄像头
500 万像素网络摄像头可拍摄出不错的图像,非常适合视频会议使用。作为一款笔记本电脑网络摄像头,该摄像头能很好地保留细节,但在光线不足的情况下可能会出现问题。
惠普提供了一些有趣的实用工具,如惠普增强照明(HP Enhanced Lighting),它可以增亮拍摄对象周围的屏幕,还有一个视频控制应用程序,可以提供额外的取景和图像调整选项。
安全
惠普为Pavilion Plus 16 提供了一个兼容 Windows Hello 的红外摄像头和一个用于网络摄像头的隐私快门。在我们使用该设备期间,红外摄像头的运行速度相当快。
此外,还配备了 TPM 2.0 模块,以满足 Windows 11 的安全要求。
配件和保修
包装盒内除了 135 W 电源适配器和常规文件外,没有其他附件。
惠普为Pavilion Plus 16 在印度提供一年保修。购买者可以通过购买符合条件的惠普护理包将保修期延长三年。.
维护
卸下四颗 PH0 螺钉后,可撬开底部面板。内存是焊接的,但 WLAN 卡、NVMe SSD 和电池组可以根据需要更换。
输入设备全尺寸数字键盘,触感良好
键盘
Pavilion Plus 16 的键盘提供了不错的键入体验。灰色键帽与自然银色机身形成了良好的对比。数字键盘空间宽敞,在 Excel 中进行数字运算时非常方便。不过它缺少数字锁定指示灯。
电源键位于 Delete 键旁边,这可能会让初次使用的用户感到困惑。顶部和底部的方向键也感觉很拥挤。三段式白色背光有助于在光线不足时清晰显示。
触摸板
12.5 厘米 x 8 厘米的触摸板空间宽敞,滑动顺畅,反馈良好。不过,行程并不深。
整个触摸板就像鼠标左键一样。点击触摸板中部和底部比点击顶部反应更灵敏。
显示屏120 Hz WQXGA 面板,色彩逼真,无 PWM
Pavilion Plus 16 配备了 16 英寸 16:10 2560 x 1600 WQXGA IPS 面板,刷新率为 120 Hz,额定亮度为 400 尼特。
我们测得的最大亮度为 415 尼特,平均亮度为 394 尼特,亮度分布达到 90%。由于采用的是 IPS 面板,该显示屏无法避免背光溢出现象--在长时间曝光的情况下,下角部分会出现这种现象。
主观而言,Pavilion Plus 16 提供了良好的观看体验,适合工作和娱乐。
|
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 401 cd/m²
Contrast: 1185:1 (Black: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.13 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.65
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
76.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
74.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx AU Optronics AUOFDA4, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 CSOT T3 MNE007ZA1-3, IPS, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 LG Philips 160WQ2, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 Samsung ATNA40YK07-1, , 2880x1800, 14.00 | Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 LEN89C1, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.50 | Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Samsung ATNA60BX01-1, OLED, 3200x2000, 16.00 | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung ATNA60CL03-0, AMOLED, 2880x1800, 16.00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 0% | -3% | 20% | -2% | 20% | 20% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 74.6 | 74.7 0% | 70.1 -6% | 99.9 34% | 72.9 -2% | 98.7 32% | 99.9 34% |
sRGB Coverage | 99 | 99.6 1% | 99.6 1% | 100 1% | 98.2 -1% | 99.7 1% | 100 1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 76.5 | 75.8 -1% | 72.3 -5% | 96.5 26% | 74.6 -2% | 96.5 26% | 96.3 26% |
Response Times | -193% | -274% | -14% | -220% | -3% | 93% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 9.06 ? | 32.2 ? -255% | 35 ? -286% | 1.15 ? 87% | 31.8 ? -251% | 0.68 ? 92% | 0.49 ? 95% |
Response Time Black / White * | 6.7 ? | 15.4 ? -130% | 24.2 ? -261% | 14.4 ? -115% | 19.3 ? -188% | 13.2 ? -97% | 0.65 ? 90% |
PWM Frequency | 90.02 ? | 240 ? | 240 ? | ||||
Screen | 21% | 1% | 5% | 3% | -10% | 135% | |
Brightness middle | 403 | 402 0% | 299.4 -26% | 369 -8% | 344.7 -14% | 353 -12% | 400 -1% |
Brightness | 394 | 371 -6% | 290 -26% | 364 -8% | 334 -15% | 354 -10% | 399 1% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 86 -4% | 92 2% | 85 -6% | 92 2% | 98 9% | 93 3% |
Black Level * | 0.34 | 0.27 21% | 0.21 38% | 0.31 9% | 0.03 91% | ||
Contrast | 1185 | 1489 26% | 1426 20% | 1112 -6% | 13333 1025% | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.13 | 1.8 42% | 4.25 -36% | 2.85 9% | 3.01 4% | 4.23 -35% | 2.3 27% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.14 | 3.6 41% | 6.71 -9% | 4.22 31% | 6.3 -3% | 7.13 -16% | 4.15 32% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.65 | 1.5 9% | 0.52 68% | 2.18 -32% | 0.83 50% | 2.42 -47% | 1.66 -1% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.5 | 1.8 60% | 5.5 -22% | 2.2 51% | 4.6 -2% | 2.5 44% | 2.7 40% |
Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.27 97% | 2.35 94% | 2.15 102% | 2.28 96% | 2.4 92% | 2.266 97% |
CCT | 6261 104% | 6695 97% | 6368 102% | 6518 100% | 6420 101% | 6642 98% | 7047 92% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -57% /
-14% | -92% /
-39% | 4% /
6% | -73% /
-30% | 2% /
-1% | 83% /
105% |
* ... smaller is better
该面板覆盖了 99% 的 sRGB 色彩空间,同时还能很好地再现 Adobe RGB 和 Display P3 色彩。这使得Pavilion Plus 16 适合一般多媒体消费和基本编辑工作流程,尤其是网络内容。
使用肖像显示器公司提供的 X-Rite i1Basic Pro 3 分光光度计和 Calman Ultimate 软件,我们将灰度和 ColorChecker Delta E 2000 的平均值分别从 4.5 提高到 0.6 和 3.13 提高到 1.65。
我们的校准文件可从上面的链接下载。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
6.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.6 ms rise | |
↘ 3.1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
9.06 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.27 ms rise | |
↘ 4.79 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17908 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
鉴于Pavilion Plus 16 并非针对游戏人群,因此响应时间还算不错。在所有测试亮度水平下,我们都没有观察到 PWM,这是一件好事。
欲了解更多信息,请查看我们的文章"为什么 PWM 如此令人头疼"。我们的PWM 排名表 提供了评测设备的 PWM 测量概览。
只要没有阳光直射显示屏,室外观看在最大亮度下一般都没问题。可视角度稳定,但我们观察到在极端情况下亮度和色彩信息会丢失。
性能:酷睿 i7-13700H 受限于低 PL2
根据地区的不同,惠普提供Pavilion Plus 16 英寸 酷睿 i5-13500H和酷睿 i7-13700H 两种配置,并可选配 RTX 3050 6GB 显卡。
测试条件
myHP 应用程序允许用户在两种运行模式之间进行选择:平衡模式和性能模式。平衡模式使用 50 W 的 PL1,在性能模式下可增至 60 W。这两种模式下的 PL2 上限均为 61 W。
RTX 3050 6GB GPU 默认运行在 MSHybrid / Optimus 模式下,无法进行 MUX 切换。
我们使用性能模式进行所有基准测试。在电池供电情况下,PL1/PL2 降至 35 W / 35 W。
处理器
Pavilion Plus 16 的酷睿 i7-13700H 受限于较低的 PL2 值。这在多核基准测试中表现得尤为明显,它明显落后于戴尔 Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 等机型。 戴尔 Inspiron 16 Plus 7630戴尔 Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 采用了 89 W PL2 的酷睿 i7-13700H。
尽管如此,在 Cinebench R15 多核循环测试中,Pavilion Plus 16 的散热似乎非常有效,确保了性能的持续性。
Pavilion Plus 16 在大多数 CPU 单核心排行榜上名列前茅,但它的单核心性能却不如申克 Vision 14 M23。 申克 Vision 14 M23在这些测试中紧随其后。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 -2! | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 -2! | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 -2! |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (5890 - 20034, n=27) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average of class Multimedia (4624 - 30789, n=101, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (1323 - 1914, n=27) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2110, n=99, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (2322 - 7674, n=27) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1783 - 11768, n=97, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (508 - 741, n=27) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 812, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (905 - 2982, n=27) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Average of class Multimedia (785 - 4703, n=106, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (213 - 276, n=27) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Average of class Multimedia (142.6 - 308, n=99, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Average of class Multimedia (107 - 662, n=95, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (169 - 555, n=27) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (27322 - 76344, n=27) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Average of class Multimedia (20166 - 119900, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (4825 - 6238, n=27) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7163, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 |
Geekbench 6.2 / Multi-Core | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Average of class Multimedia (8656 - 21264, n=30, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (9985 - 13832, n=11) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU |
Geekbench 6.2 / Single-Core | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Average of class Multimedia (2320 - 3157, n=30, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (2316 - 2639, n=11) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (6165 - 14215, n=27) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Average of class Multimedia (3828 - 23059, n=100, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (1362 - 1919, n=27) | |
Average of class Multimedia (926 - 2342, n=100, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (6.72 - 21.2, n=27) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average of class Multimedia (4.99 - 30.5, n=88, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (31.3 - 62.4, n=27) | |
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 84.9, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Average of class Multimedia (0.3826 - 0.723, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (0.4308 - 0.607, n=27) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (4986 - 18908, n=27) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average of class Multimedia (3804 - 27411, n=88, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (25360 - 92359, n=27) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (16379 - 136048, n=88, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (1339 - 4224, n=27) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1099 - 6681, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (68763 - 107159, n=27) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 134321, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (3099 - 15484, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (4800 - 11050, n=27) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (12321 - 45118, n=27) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Average of class Multimedia (9602 - 68591, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (28769 - 151254, n=27) | |
Average of class Multimedia (23702 - 169946, n=88, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (389 - 1215, n=27) | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average of class Multimedia (302 - 1901, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (2540 - 10135, n=27) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1996 - 14590, n=88, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (19552 - 52727, n=27) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 |
查看我们的专用 英特尔酷睿 i7-13700H页面,了解更多性能比较。
系统性能
Pavilion Plus 16 在某种程度上超越了 VivoBook Pro 16,配备了 酷睿 i9-13900H和 RTX 4050组合的 VivoBook Pro 16,但在 PCMark 10 中输给后者 6%。
除此之外,该系统在执行日常工作和网页浏览任务时反应相当灵敏。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average of class Multimedia (4635 - 8670, n=85, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (6290 - 6597, n=2) | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (9943 - 10112, n=2) | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (8803 - 8950, n=2) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Average of class Multimedia (5845 - 11186, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average of class Multimedia (4688 - 13548, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (7590 - 8752, n=2) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Average of class Multimedia (1009 - 2146, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (1504 - 1752, n=2) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Average of class Multimedia (971 - 2064, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (1417 - 1657, n=2) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2865, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (1711 - 1970, n=2) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average of class Multimedia (926 - 2171, n=91, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (1220 - 1458, n=2) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (64356 - 65837, n=2) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Average of class Multimedia (20513 - 94254, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (65825 - 70861, n=2) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 90142, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (68174 - 76930, n=2) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 95196, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (75 - 346, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (85.7 - 89.7, n=2) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (171.4 - 432, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (286 - 300, n=2) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (273 - 325, n=2) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Average of class Multimedia (133.2 - 348, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Average of class Multimedia (363 - 1016, n=95, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (490 - 496, n=2) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5525 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5653 points | |
PCMark 10 Score | 6597 points | |
Help |
DPC 延迟
Pavilion Plus 16 的中断到处理延迟时间实测值为 5325.1 μs,偏高,这可能会引起实时音频和视频工作流程用户的担忧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 |
* ... smaller is better
我们的 DPC 延迟排名页面提供更多已评测设备的延迟比较。
存储设备
我们的Pavilion Plus 16 设备安装了西部数据 PC SN810 1 TB NVMe 硬盘。累计硬盘性能比申克 Vision 14 M23 中的三星 990 Pro 慢约 10%,比申克 Vision 14 M23 中的三星 PM9A1 慢约 16%。 三星Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16.
较低的 4K 读/写性能是造成这一性能差距的主要原因。
遗憾的是,机箱内只能安装一个固态硬盘。也无法添加 2.5 英寸硬盘。
* ... smaller is better
磁盘节流DiskSpd 读取循环,队列深度 8
虽然惠普为固态硬盘提供了散热罩,但在队列深度为 8 的 DiskSpd 读取循环测试中,这显然不足以防止硬盘在第 25 次循环后出现节流。
更多存储基准可在我们的 固态硬盘比较页面.
图形处理器性能
Pavilion Plus 16 是除联想 Slim Pro 7 和申克 Vision 14 M23 之外,我们测试过的唯一采用较新 RTX 3050 6 GB 笔记本 GPU 的笔记本电脑。
惠普笔记本的 RTX 3050 6 GB 额定 TGP 为 60 W,而申克和联想分别为 50 W 和 63 W。
因此,Slim 7 Pro 的 3DMark 累计性能略高于Pavilion Plus 16,而 Vision 14 M23 则落后惠普 5%。
3DMark 11 Performance | 17282 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 82182 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 43015 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 10890 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 5641 points | |
Help |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU (53 - 99, n=8) | |
Average of class Multimedia (19 - 99, n=45, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU (97 - 152, n=10) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Average of class Multimedia (32 - 152, n=47, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU (388 - 937, n=9) | |
Average of class Multimedia (190 - 1374, n=83, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
与 RTX 3050 4GB 相比,我们发现 RTX 3050 6GB 在 1080p 游戏中的累积优势约为 10%。 RTX 3050 4 GB平均水平。
与 Slim Pro 7 和 Vision 14 M23 相比,Pavilion Plus 16 的 RTX 3050 在 1080p 游戏性能方面显示出良好的累积优势,而与 VivoBook Pro 16 的 65 W RTX 4050 笔记本电脑 GPU 相比则落后 25%。
有趣的是,Pavilion Plus 16 还能在整体游戏性能上超越配备 RTX 4050 的Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16,但这是因为后者在Dota 2 Reborn和X-Plane 11 中表现不佳。
RTX 3050 6 GB 可以在 1080p 超高设置下流畅运行旧版游戏,但在 1080p 高设置以上的现代 AAA 游戏中却很吃力。
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU (48 - 72.5, n=20) | |
Average of class Multimedia (4.24 - 123, n=88, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 |
Witcher 3 FPS 图表
在TheWitcher 3 1080p Ultra 的压力测试中,我们没有发现明显的节流现象,这说明散热效率很高。
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
GTA V (2015) | 177.9 | 172 | 123.3 | 62.7 | 42.7 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 244 | 159.1 | 91.4 | 50.1 | 37 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 155.2 | 131 | 124.2 | 116.9 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 128.2 | 70.9 | 52 | 37.4 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 140.6 | 117 | 97.3 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 89 | 82 | 76 | 52 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 256 | 112.8 | 91.9 | 80.5 | 57.1 |
F1 22 (2022) | 150.2 | 145.3 | 109.5 | 34 | 20.1 |
F1 23 (2023) | 150.1 | 141.2 | 97.5 | 26 | 14.3 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 67.6 | 52.1 | 43.2 | 36.9 | 21.3 |
Assassin's Creed Mirage (2023) | 70 | 63 | 55 | 41 | 31 |
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora (2023) | 39.5 | 36.3 | 31.5 | 23.4 | 15.1 |
请参阅我们专门的 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3050 6 GB 笔记本电脑 GPU页面了解更多信息。
排放:风扇噪音尚可忍受,但负载情况下表面温度较高
系统噪音
在最大负载下的性能模式下,我们测得的声压级 (SPL) 为 42.1 dB(A)。惠普似乎为风扇噪音设定了限制,在平衡模式下低于 35 dB(A),在性能模式下低于 45 dB(A)。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 22.22 / 22.22 / 22.22 dB(A) |
Load |
| 42.03 / 42.1 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 22.22 dB(A) |
性能模式 | 空闲 dB(A) | 负载平均 dB(A) | 负载最大 dB(A) | Witcher 3 1080p Ultra dB(A) |
---|---|---|---|---|
平衡 | 22.22 | 33.81 | 34.08 | 34.41 / 48 fps |
性能 | 22.22 | 42.03 | 42.1 | 42.1 / 50 帧/秒 |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 R7 7735HS, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -10% | -7% | -10% | -4% | -14% | -9% | |
off / environment * | 22.22 | 23.5 -6% | 23.2 -4% | 21.46 3% | 22.7 -2% | 20.96 6% | 25 -13% |
Idle Minimum * | 22.22 | 23.5 -6% | 23.2 -4% | 22.08 1% | 22.8 -3% | 25.28 -14% | 26 -17% |
Idle Average * | 22.22 | 23.5 -6% | 23.2 -4% | 22.08 1% | 22.8 -3% | 25.28 -14% | 27 -22% |
Idle Maximum * | 22.22 | 26 -17% | 23.2 -4% | 22.08 1% | 22.8 -3% | 25.28 -14% | 28 -26% |
Load Average * | 42.03 | 43.6 -4% | 35.1 16% | 52.98 -26% | 43.8 -4% | 51.88 -23% | 40 5% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 42.1 | 48.7 -16% | 52.5 -25% | 52.7 -25% | 43.8 -4% | 49 -16% | 39 7% |
Load Maximum * | 42.1 | 49.1 -17% | 52.5 -25% | 52.67 -25% | 47.1 -12% | 51.8 -23% | 41 3% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
Pavilion Plus 16 采用了双风扇双热管系统来冷却 CPU 和 GPU。在我们的压力测试中,这种设置被推向了极限,表面温度最高达到 49.6°C,最低达到 45.8°C。
虽然该设备可以舒适地放在膝上执行轻量级任务,但在繁重的工作负载下会让人感到不舒服。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.6 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.8 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-6.2 °C / -11.2 F).
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 10% | 6% | -2% | 19% | -1% | 22% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 49.6 | 48.5 2% | 47.8 4% | 49.2 1% | 42.2 15% | 42.6 14% | 41 17% |
Maximum Bottom * | 45.8 | 52.8 -15% | 42.2 8% | 54 -18% | 49 -7% | 48.4 -6% | 44 4% |
Idle Upper Side * | 39.2 | 27.6 30% | 35.2 10% | 33.6 14% | 24.4 38% | 39.4 -1% | 23 41% |
Idle Bottom * | 35.4 | 27 24% | 35 1% | 37.6 -6% | 25.2 29% | 39.8 -12% | 26 27% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在 Prime95 in-place large FFTs 压力测试中,Pavilion Plus 16 的酷睿 i7-13700H 平均主频为 2.2 GHz,而封装功耗平均为 53 W。
加入 FurMark 后,Core i7-13700H 和 RTX 3050 竞争功耗,导致 CPU 和 GPU 的时钟时断时续地上升和下降。
平均而言,Core i7-13700H 的时钟频率最高只能达到 1.96 GHz,而 RTX 3050 的时钟频率为 910 MHz,平均功耗分别为 41 W 和 39 W。
在 1080p 超高清环境下, Witcher 3 。现在,RTX 3050 几乎可以持续利用接近 60 W 的最大 TGP。
有趣的是,即使 CPU/GPU 时钟和功率保持相对不变,核心温度也会在一段时间后开始下降。
压力测试 | CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | GPU 平均温度(°C) |
系统空闲 | 3.74 | - | 52 | 31.1 |
Prime95 | 2.1 | - | 86 | 67.4 |
Prime95 + FurMark | 1.93 | 735 | 86 | 73.5 |
Witcher 3 1080p Ultra | 2.2 | 1,717 | 71 | 74.2 |
发言人
Pavilion Plus 16 配有一对立体声扬声器,其输出音量为 74.2 dB(A),在大多数普通大小的房间中都足够使用。低音清晰可辨,但并不突出。不过,中高音相对清晰。
不过,用户可以通过外置扬声器或蓝牙 5.3 获得更好的音效。
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理:经济省电,电池寿命长
耗电量
Pavilion Plus 16 的功耗相对于给定硬件的总体功耗较低。虽然申克 Vision 14 M23 和联想 Slim Pro 7 在平均负载和 Witcher 3 下更省电,但 Pavilion Plus 16 在最大负载下更省电。
随机提供的 135 W 电源适配器足以在压力下为笔记本供电。
Off / Standby | 0.087 / 0.16 Watt |
Idle | 3.3 / 7.3 / 14.24 Watt |
Load |
91.7 / 115.8 Watt |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, IPS, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, , 2880x1800, 14.00 | Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 R7 7735HS, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.50 | Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, OLED, 3200x2000, 16.00 | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMOLED, 2880x1800, 16.00 | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -2% | -100% | 6% | -30% | -141% | 20% | -14% | -35% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.3 | 5.2 -58% | 15.6 -373% | 4.96 -50% | 7.6 -130% | 21.06 -538% | 3 9% | 5.37 ? -63% | 7.29 ? -121% |
Idle Average * | 7.3 | 7.8 -7% | 17.7 -142% | 7.54 -3% | 12.2 -67% | 24.27 -232% | 5 32% | 9.1 ? -25% | 11.8 ? -62% |
Idle Maximum * | 14.24 | 9 37% | 20.6 -45% | 9.31 35% | 12.8 10% | 25.12 -76% | 11 23% | 12 ? 16% | 14.6 ? -3% |
Load Average * | 91.7 | 78.6 14% | 87.4 5% | 83.4 9% | 76.5 17% | 52.4 43% | 72 21% | 82.3 ? 10% | 77.7 ? 15% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 96.2 | 86.8 10% | 121.7 -27% | 73.3 24% | 89.5 7% | 110.2 -15% | 69.7 28% | ||
Load Maximum * | 115.8 | 121.2 -5% | 138 -19% | 91.74 21% | 135.7 -17% | 146 -26% | 108 7% | 124.2 ? -7% | 121 ? -4% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption: The Witcher 3 / Stress test
Power Consumption: External monitor
电池寿命
强劲但低功耗的内部结构有助于实现良好的电池续航时间。Pavilion Plus 16 的电池容量为 68 瓦时,在亮度为 150 尼特的情况下,可实现近 10.5 小时的网页浏览和 12 小时的 1080p 视频播放,运行时间令人印象深刻。
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, 68 Wh | SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 86 Wh | Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 63 Wh | Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 R7 7735HS, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, 73 Wh | Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 96 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 16% | -9% | -18% | 1% | -11% | 2% | -5% | |
H.264 | 720 | 626 -13% | 585 -19% | 803 12% | 710 ? -1% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 624 | 723 16% | 566 -9% | 486 -22% | 628 1% | 606 -3% | 576 -8% | 572 ? -8% |
Reader / Idle | 1055 | 1093 | 933 ? | |||||
Load | 85 | 67 | 106 | 97.7 ? | ||||
Witcher 3 ultra | 75 | 81.8 ? |
Pros
Cons
评价:巨大潜力因妥协而受阻
惠普Pavilion Plus 16 满足了人们对现代多媒体笔记本电脑的大部分要求,适合工作和娱乐。Pavilion Plus 16 采用全金属结构,没有多余的弯曲,散发出高档的质感,端口选择也涵盖了基本功能。
2560 x 1600 120 Hz 的面板不具备 HDR 或广泛的 Adobe RGB 和 Display P3 覆盖范围,这与 Pavilion Plus 14的 2.8K OLED 面板。不过,它能满足基本需求,响应时间合适,没有 PWM 闪烁。
惠普Pavilion Plus 16 是一款全能型多媒体和生产力笔记本电脑,但从售价来看,它最好至少能配备 RTX 4050"。
一旦开始与竞争对手进行比较,性能上的局限性就显而易见了。事实证明,与戴尔 Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 相比,60 W PL2 对Pavilion Plus 16 的多核性能尤其不利。 戴尔 Inspiron 16 Plus 7630甚至 三星Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16甚至三星 Book3 Ultra 16,它们都采用了更高瓦数的酷睿 i7-13700H。
惠普本可以在额外的电源配置文件中轻松允许 80 W PL2 或更高的功率,以最大限度地发挥芯片的潜力。然而,在当前配置的负载下,散热子系统已经显得十分紧张。
NvidiaGeForce RTX 3050 6 GB 在性能和能效方面都不及 Ada 代。虽然 1080p 游戏性能比 RTX 3050 4 GB 有了明显提升,但合成测试并未显示出太大的激励作用。
Pavilion Plus 16 在惠普网站上的售价为 1350 美元,比 Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 高出 100 美元,后者提供 60 W RTX 4060 和性能更好的酷睿 i7-13700H。尽管如此,在印度市场,Pavilion Plus 16 的售价比 Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 便宜。
华硕 华硕 VivoBook Pro 16华硕 VivoBook Pro 16 配备 3.2K OLED 显示屏、酷睿 i9-13900H 和高达 RTX 4060 的处理器,对于初出茅庐的创作者来说是一个绝佳的选择,只要塑料材质和 300 美元的额外溢价不会让你望而却步。
价格和供应情况
经测试的惠普Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx 可从惠普印度官方网站购买,售价为 1,24,999 英镑。网站上购买,价格为 1,24,999 ₹。在惠普美国网站上也可以配置这款笔记本电脑,价格为 1,350 美元。
亚马逊印度站提供的Pavilion Plus 16 不含 RTX 3050 dGPU,售价为 1,25,900 英镑。
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
-
02/07/2024 v7
Vaidyanathan Subramaniam
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.