Notebookcheck

技嘉Aero 15Classic-XA(酷睿 i7-9750H, RTX 2070 Max-Q)笔记本电脑评测

小巧的高性能机器。 凭借Core i7-9750H处理器和GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q GPU，技嘉的超薄游戏笔记本Aero 15 Classic-XA可在其15.6英寸屏幕（240 Hz，FHD，IGZO）上流畅运行所有现代游戏。它的其他部件看起来也很不错：NVMe SSD，双通道的16 GB RAM和
Sascha Mölck, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by Zewei Shen),
Coffee Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Windows
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA (Aero 15 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-9750H 6 x 2.6 - 4.5 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q - 8192 MB, Core: 885 MHz, Memory: 6000 MHz, GDDR6, 256-bit bus, ForceWare 430.39, Optimus
Memory
16384 MB 
, SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, Dual-Channel, two storage bays (both occupied), max 64 GB
Display
15.6 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IGZO, 240 Hz, X-Rite Pantone, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel HM370
Storage
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8, 512 GB 
, NVMe, 2x M.2 Typ 2280 (one slot occupied)
Soundcard
Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Cannon Point-LP PCH - cAVS (Audio, Video, Speech)
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm组合耳机和麦克风插孔, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC, TPM 2.0
Networking
Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW) (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 19 x 356 x 250
Battery
94.24 Wh, 6200 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 15.2 V
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 2x 2 W立体声扬声器, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 230 W充电器, XSplit Gamecaster Premium (3 month trial), XSplit Broadcaster Premium (3 month trial), 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.122 kg, Power Supply: 724 g
Links
Gigabyte homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

❌
362 mm 265 mm 25 mm 2.3 kg359 mm 243 mm 22 mm 2 kg359 mm 255 mm 18 mm 2.1 kg360 mm 268 mm 15.75 mm 2.1 kg356 mm 250 mm 19 mm 2.1 kg356 mm 250 mm 18.9 mm 2.1 kg355 mm 235 mm 17.8 mm 2.1 kg

» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
200 MB/s ∼100% +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
197 MB/s ∼99%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 212, n=278)
92.8 MB/s ∼46% -53%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 Turing
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
79 MB/s ∼40% -60%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
242 MB/s ∼100% 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
242 MB/s ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=276)
110 MB/s ∼45% -55%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 Turing
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
89 MB/s ∼37% -63%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
696 MBit/s ∼100%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
684 MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 1670, n=319)
679 MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
678 MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 Turing
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
676 MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
671 MBit/s ∼96% -4%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
661 MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
596 MBit/s ∼86% -14%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Predator Triton 500
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
683 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
680 MBit/s ∼100% 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
678 MBit/s ∼99%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 Turing
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
677 MBit/s ∼99% 0%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
655 MBit/s ∼96% -3%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
644 MBit/s ∼94% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 1645, n=319)
630 MBit/s ∼92% -7%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
588 MBit/s ∼86% -13%
242
cd/m²		249
cd/m²		241
cd/m²
255
cd/m²		266
cd/m²		248
cd/m²
245
cd/m²		246
cd/m²		236
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5)
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 266 cd/m² Average: 247.6 cd/m² Minimum: 8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 266 cd/m²
Contrast: 858:1 (Black: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.78 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9, calibrated: 0.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.58 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
96% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 62% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.46
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IGZO, 1920x1080, 		Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080, 		Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080, 		Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2, IPS, 1920x1080, 		Schenker XMG Neo 15 Turing
BOEhydis NV156FHM-N4G (BOE07AF), IPS, 1920x1080, 		Acer Predator Triton 500
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080, 		Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
LP156WFG-SPB2, IPS, 1920x1080,
Response Times
-15%
-8%
34%
-14%
24%
-21%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
15.2 (7.6, 7.6)
16.4 (8.8, 7.6)
-8%
16.8 (9.2, 7.6)
-11%
7 (3.6, 3.4)
54%
8.8 (4.4, 4.4)
42%
8 (4, 4)
47%
18.8 (11.6, 7.2)
-24%
Response Time Black / White *
11.2 (6.8, 4.4)
13.6 (8.4, 5.2)
-21%
11.6 (7.2, 4.4)
-4%
9.6 (4.4, 5.2)
14%
10 (6, 4)
11%
11.2 (6, 5.2)
-0%
13.2 (8, 5.2)
-18%
PWM Frequency
23580 (24)
1000 (99)
-96%
Screen
16%
-4%
-11%
-18%
-18%
-17%
Brightness middle
266
250
-6%
314.7
18%
323.6
22%
268
1%
304
14%
320.4
20%
Brightness
248
235
-5%
312
26%
315
27%
270
9%
299
21%
298
20%
Brightness Distribution
89
85
-4%
90
1%
91
2%
84
-6%
89
0%
85
-4%
Black Level *
0.31
0.29
6%
0.38
-23%
0.29
6%
0.24
23%
0.27
13%
0.42
-35%
Contrast
858
862
0%
828
-3%
1116
30%
1117
30%
1126
31%
763
-11%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.78
1.46
47%
2.56
8%
3.31
-19%
4.51
-62%
4.66
-68%
3.21
-15%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.96
2.47
59%
4.89
18%
5.74
4%
9.58
-61%
9.65
-62%
5.54
7%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
0.91
1.71
-88%
2.73
-200%
1.57
-73%
1.72
-89%
2.36
-159%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.58
1.27
65%
3.4
5%
2.9
19%
5.36
-50%
5.53
-54%
3.6
-1%
Gamma
2.46 89%
2.4 92%
2.3 96%
2.29 96%
2.51 88%
2.5 88%
2.27 97%
CCT
7186 90%
6749 96%
6435 101%
6765 96%
7826 83%
8028 81%
6503 100%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
62
60
-3%
60.7
-2%
59.7
-4%
59
-5%
60
-3%
59
-5%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
96
93
-3%
94.6
-1%
91.8
-4%
92
-4%
93
-3%
92
-4%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
1% / 11%
-6% / -4%
12% / -4%
-16% / -17%
3% / -12%
-19% / -18%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.7 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
15.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.6 ms rise
↘ 7.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.2 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 23580 Hz ≤ 24 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 23580 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 24 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 23580 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 50 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18115 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
LatencyMon
Intel XTU
01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120113011401150116011701180119012001210Tooltip
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1007 (976.09-1115.02)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1095 (1087.31-1156.25)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø922 (913.2-999)
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1072 (986.63-1110.9)
Schenker XMG Neo 15 Turing Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø994 (961.98-1074.38)
Acer Predator Triton 500 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø980 (961.82-1019.05)
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1183 (1168.7-1209.56)
CPU clock rates during the CB15 loop
CPU clock rates during the CB15 loop
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
6704
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
33694
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
9464
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
175 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1115 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
109.82 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Help
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R10 | Cinebench R20 | Geekbench 3 | Geekbench 4.4 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Octane V2 | WebXPRT 3 | JetStream 1.1
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Predator Triton 500
Intel Core i7-8750H
176 Points ∼100% +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
175 Points ∼99%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points ∼99% -1%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points ∼99% -1%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
Intel Core i7-8750H
173 Points ∼98% -1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
168 Points ∼95% -4%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
166 Points ∼94% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 215, n=576)
159 Points ∼90% -9%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
Intel Core i7-8750H
1238 Points ∼100% +11%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
1156 Points ∼93% +4%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
1122 Points ∼91% +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
1115 Points ∼90%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-8750H
1079 Points ∼87% -3%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Intel Core i7-8750H
1019 Points ∼82% -9%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
999 Points ∼81% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2804, n=580)
886 Points ∼72% -21%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
33923 Points ∼100% +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
33694 Points ∼99%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-8750H
31800 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (3026 - 50462, n=441)
18875 Points ∼56% -44%
Rendering Single 32Bit
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
6704 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-8750H
6645 Points ∼99% -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
6351 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (1645 - 8872, n=441)
4905 Points ∼73% -27%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (340 - 511, n=96)
441 Points ∼100% +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
429 Points ∼97%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-8750H
418 Points ∼95% -3%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (1530 - 6321, n=97)
2837 Points ∼100% +17%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
2427 Points ∼86%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-8750H
2340 Points ∼82% -4%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
23246 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-8750H
21659 Points ∼93% -7%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
21358 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (9307 - 27774, n=81)
16229 Points ∼70% -30%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
4166 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-8750H
4139 Points ∼99% -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
3741 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (2926 - 4825, n=81)
3710 Points ∼89% -11%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
23396 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-8750H
20592 Points ∼88% -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (4116 - 40720, n=80)
20070 Points ∼86% -14%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
18716 Points ∼80% -20%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
5218 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-8750H
5123 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (2131 - 6030, n=80)
4891 Points ∼94% -6%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
4810 Points ∼92% -8%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Gaming
  (745 - 7545, n=238)
1155 ms * ∼100% -8%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)
1138.1 ms * ∼99% -6%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)
1125.7 ms * ∼97% -5%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)
1121.9 ms * ∼97% -5%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
Intel Core i7-8750H (Microsoft Edge 44.17763.1.0)
1119.3 ms * ∼97% -4%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 42.17134.1.0)
1103.4 ms * ∼96% -3%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H (Edge 44)
1071.8 ms * ∼93%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H (Edge 44)
36178 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)
35120 Points ∼97% -3%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
Intel Core i7-8750H (Microsoft Edge 44.17763.1.0)
34062 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (12288 - 49518, n=210)
33662 Points ∼93% -7%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)
33659 Points ∼93% -7%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 42.17134.1.0)
33637 Points ∼93% -7%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)
30594 Points ∼85% -15%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H (Edge 44)
229 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (152 - 249, n=29)
220 Points ∼96% -4%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)
255.92 Points ∼100% +3%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)
255.46 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Gaming
  (51.6 - 333, n=218)
251 Points ∼98% +1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 42.17134.1.0)
250.68 Points ∼98% +1%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
Intel Core i7-8750H (Microsoft Edge 44.17763.1.0)
250.23 Points ∼98% 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H (Edge 44)
249.43 Points ∼97%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)
245.41 Points ∼96% -2%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 7 Score
6854 points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4851 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5574 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
6035 points
Help
PCMark 10 | PCMark 8
PCMark 10 - Score
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5941 Points ∼100% +4%
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0)
5883 Points ∼99% +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5697 Points ∼96%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
5651 Points ∼95% -1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5492 Points ∼92% -4%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5416 Points ∼91% -5%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
5353 Points ∼90% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7511, n=269)
5303 Points ∼89% -7%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
6035 Points ∼100%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5852 Points ∼97% -3%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
5679 Points ∼94% -6%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
5645 Points ∼94% -6%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5607 Points ∼93% -7%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5289 Points ∼88% -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6593, n=428)
5082 Points ∼84% -16%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5115 Points ∼100% +5%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
4851 Points ∼95%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
4582 Points ∼90% -6%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
4338 Points ∼85% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=445)
4277 Points ∼84% -12%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4150 Points ∼81% -14%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
3979 Points ∼78% -18%
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
hddimg
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
Sequential Read: 2478 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1190 MB/s
512K Read: 1611 MB/s
512K Write: 1163 MB/s
4K Read: 73.05 MB/s
4K Write: 194.3 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 611.3 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 457.1 MB/s
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8		Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8		Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ		Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8		Schenker XMG Neo 15 Turing
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB		Acer Predator Triton 500
2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0)		Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-15%
-13%
-33%
-6%
7%
-20%
Write 4K
115.5
97.13
-16%
93.88
-19%
93.92
-19%
92.52
-20%
93.6
-19%
80.98
-30%
Read 4K
57.97
53.66
-7%
40.56
-30%
46.29
-20%
40.45
-30%
38.82
-33%
36.03
-38%
Write Seq
1555
1526
-2%
1468
-6%
974.3
-37%
1197
-23%
2455
58%
1687
8%
Read Seq
2590
2020
-22%
1540
-41%
1425
-45%
1018
-61%
2107
-19%
1835
-29%
Write 4K Q32T1
369.3
285.6
-23%
293.5
-21%
259.4
-30%
288.6
-22%
298.7
-19%
205.3
-44%
Read 4K Q32T1
441.7
321.8
-27%
346
-22%
296.5
-33%
332
-25%
338.7
-23%
229
-48%
Write Seq Q32T1
1547
1533
-1%
1941
25%
976.7
-37%
3317
114%
2902
88%
1683
9%
Read Seq Q32T1
2969
2351
-21%
3266
10%
1666
-44%
3515
18%
3536
19%
3363
13%
3DMark 06 Standard
35193 points
3DMark 11 Performance
18171 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
113186 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
35891 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
15494 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
6639 points
Help
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
8171 Points ∼100% +22%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6728 Points ∼82% 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6716 Points ∼82%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6562 Points ∼80% -2%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6460 Points ∼79% -4%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6368 Points ∼78% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (368 - 13013, n=214)
5886 Points ∼72% -12%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
21237 Points ∼100% +23%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
18153 Points ∼85% +5%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
17598 Points ∼83% +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
17335 Points ∼82%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
16989 Points ∼80% -2%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
16589 Points ∼78% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=601)
11926 Points ∼56% -31%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
28997 Points ∼100% +32%
Acer Predator Triton 500
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
28083 Points ∼97% +28%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22723 Points ∼78% +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22089 Points ∼76% 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22005 Points ∼76%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
21860 Points ∼75% -1%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
21723 Points ∼75% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=678)
14238 Points ∼49% -35%
The Witcher 3 | BioShock Infinite | Far Cry 5
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
80.3 fps ∼100% +25%
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
76.5 (min: 63) fps ∼95% +19%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
68.9 fps ∼86% +7%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
64.1 fps ∼80%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
63.8 fps ∼79% 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
58.3 (min: 48) fps ∼73% -9%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
57 fps ∼71% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=369)
51.9 fps ∼65% -19%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
211 fps ∼100% +40%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
166 fps ∼79% +10%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
152.5 fps ∼72% +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
150.3 fps ∼71%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
148.5 fps ∼70% -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
127.7 fps ∼61% -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (9.7 - 266, n=370)
100 fps ∼47% -33%
Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
89 fps ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (10 - 113, n=46)
69.7 fps ∼78% -22%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
67 fps ∼75% -25%
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8; The Witcher 3: Ø63 (1-68)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8; The Witcher 3: Ø51.3 (44-61)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; The Witcher 3: Ø62.2 (57-70)
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8; The Witcher 3: Ø72.3 (68-77)
Schenker XMG Neo 15 Turing GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB; The Witcher 3: Ø63.9 (59-68)
Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0); The Witcher 3: Ø76.1 (70-81)
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ; The Witcher 3: Ø56.9 (51-61)
low med. high ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 321.3 279.3 238 150.3 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 273.1 189.2 113.2 64.1 fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 117.6 87.9 62.9 fps
World of Tanks enCore (2018) 490.3 218.9 129.1 fps
Far Cry 5 (2018) 127 100 95 89 fps
Forza Horizon 4 (2018) 150 121 118 98 fps
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 113 93 87 79 fps
Metro Exodus (2019) 128.8 79.8 56.3 47.7 fps
The Division 2 (2019) 147 108 87 70 fps
Anno 1800 (2019) 92 82.1 68.1 34 fps

Noise Level

Idle
31 / 34 / 39 dB(A)
Load
46 / 55 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q		Schenker XMG Neo 15 Turing
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Acer Predator Triton 500
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q		Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Noise
6%
16%
3%
2%
8%
13%
off / environment *
30
30
-0%
28.8
4%
28.7
4%
30
-0%
29
3%
28
7%
Idle Minimum *
31
32
-3%
28.8
7%
29.8
4%
30
3%
30
3%
32.6
-5%
Idle Average *
34
34
-0%
28.8
15%
32.4
5%
32
6%
32
6%
32.7
4%
Idle Maximum *
39
36
8%
29.4
25%
38
3%
35
10%
34
13%
32.7
16%
Load Average *
46
42
9%
35.7
22%
38.2
17%
47
-2%
44
4%
33.3
28%
Witcher 3 ultra *
53
44
17%
42.5
20%
56.6
-7%
53
-0%
46
13%
41.6
22%
Load Maximum *
55
48
13%
45
18%
56.6
-3%
55
-0%
47
15%
45.2
18%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 57 °C58 °C58 °C 
 42 °C50 °C44 °C 
 37 °C40 °C39 °C 
Maximum: 58 °C
Average: 47.2 °C
63 °C64 °C53 °C
57 °C56 °C41 °C
40 °C41 °C37 °C
Maximum: 64 °C
Average: 50.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  38 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 47.2 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 58 °C / 136 F, compared to the average of 39.7 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 64 °C / 147 F, compared to the average of 42.5 °C / 109 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.1 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-11.2 °C / -20.2 F).
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q		Schenker XMG Neo 15 Turing
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Acer Predator Triton 500
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q		Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Heat
6%
17%
10%
-2%
2%
9%
Maximum Upper Side *
58
56
3%
49
16%
47
19%
58
-0%
49
16%
37.6
35%
Maximum Bottom *
64
66
-3%
49
23%
48.6
24%
68
-6%
58
9%
45.2
29%
Idle Upper Side *
30
27
10%
25.4
15%
28.8
4%
30
-0%
33
-10%
32.2
-7%
Idle Bottom *
31
27
13%
27.2
12%
33.2
-7%
31
-0%
33
-6%
37.2
-20%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2043.345.52539.640.63132.434.94034.435.55027.228.86329.332.38027.732.210026.832.512523.434.216022.74920022.958.325023.562.131519.962.240019.762.450019.260.263017.967.58001871.9100017.871125018.975.2160017.871.6200017.470.1250017.768.5315017.770.9400017.869.3500017.562.4630017.564.6800017.467.71000017.366.71250017.367.61600017.362.6SPL30.281.9N1.453.1median 17.8median 66.7Delta1.54.738.841.439.537.736.840.33939.938.137.734.638.733.844.233.744.332.246.131.95433.154.530.260.63066.228.670.527.371.626.967.726.566.426.568.726.363.526.265.926.161.226.159.92657.125.95925.859.225.758.325.851.925.64925.646.325.542.438.576.13.438.5median 26.3median 59.22.17.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseGigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XARazer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (71.62 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.4 / 0.8 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 21 / 23 / 32 Watt
Load midlight 97 / 213 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q		Schenker XMG Neo 15 Turing
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Acer Predator Triton 500
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q		Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Power Consumption
21%
26%
6%
23%
9%
5%
Idle Minimum *
21
16
24%
10.4
50%
16.1
23%
13
38%
16
24%
22.9
-9%
Idle Average *
23
18
22%
14.6
37%
20.9
9%
16
30%
22
4%
27.2
-18%
Idle Maximum *
32
23
28%
16.3
49%
27
16%
21
34%
32
-0%
27.5
14%
Load Average *
97
88
9%
88.5
9%
93.4
4%
84
13%
89
8%
83.4
14%
Witcher 3 ultra *
148
120
19%
155.4
-5%
168.2
-14%
135
9%
147
1%
143.6
3%
Load Maximum *
213
167
22%
182.4
14%
215.3
-1%
183
14%
173
19%
160.5
25%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
9h 05min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge 44)
7h 01min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
6h 48min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 01min
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh		Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh		Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh		Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 80 Wh		Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 50 Wh		Schenker XMG Neo 15 Turing
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 62.3 Wh		Acer Predator Triton 500
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 82 Wh		Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 57 Wh
Battery Runtime
-6%
18%
-11%
-57%
-32%
-50%
-64%
Reader / Idle
545
549
1%
762
40%
682
25%
412
-24%
335
-39%
235
-57%
H.264
408
364
-11%
504
24%
292
-28%
WiFi v1.3
421
382
-9%
513
22%
387
-8%
181
-57%
304
-28%
190
-55%
166
-61%
Load
181
174
-4%
156
-14%
88
-51%
93
-49%
81
-55%
46
-75%

Pros

+ X-Rite Pantone认证
+ 240赫兹的屏幕
+ 紧凑轻巧的设计
+ 卓越的做工
+ 低调的设计
+ 窄边框
+ RGB键盘背光
+ 实用软件
+ 高速的NVMe SSD
+ 第二个M.2 2280槽
+ 雷电3
+ 高速SD卡读卡器

Cons

- 屏幕亮度低
- 风扇声音恼人
- 运行温度高
- 扬声器中规中矩
- CPU发挥不出所有性能
技嘉Aero 15Classic-XA-7DE5250P, test unit provided by Gigabyte Germany.
技嘉Aero 15Classic-XA-7DE5250P, test unit provided by Gigabyte Germany.

从外观来看，与其前代Aero 15-X9相比，Aero 15 Classic并没有真正的改变。所有的变化在于内部：笔记本电脑配备了全新的六核Core i7-9750H，Core i7-8750H的后续产品。

不过新的Core i7-9750H无法提供任何实质性的改进。

它无法真正利用其略高的内存，测试结果通常与i7-8750H相当。最重要的是，在高负载下性能会持续下降，我们使用CineBench R15进行循环测量。我们认为这台机子的散热压不住这块CPU。

尽管如此，Core i7-9750H和GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q的组合可以在1080p高画质下流畅的运行所有游戏。高速的NVMe SSD可实现流畅的系统性能，并且该设备还具有第二个M.2 2280 SSD的空闲插槽。

另一个改进是Aero 15 Classic的屏幕。虽然Aero 15-X9已经配备了144-Hz IPS显示屏，但技嘉为Aero 15 Classic提供了由夏普制造的240-Hz IGZO面板。这款新面板提供稳定的视角，快速的响应时间，当然还有很棒的色彩。然而，我们对亮度和对比度感到失望。考虑到这台设备的价格，这两项的表现算不上出色。续航时间对于游戏本来说非常棒。

Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA - 05/14/2020 v7
Sascha Mölck

Chassis
84 / 98 → 86%
Keyboard
83%
Pointing Device
78%
Connectivity
68 / 80 → 85%
Weight
62 / 10-66 → 93%
Battery
71 / 95 → 75%
Display
86%
Games Performance
92%
Application Performance
88%
Temperature
71 / 95 → 75%
Noise
63 / 90 → 70%
Audio
82%
Camera
40 / 85 → 47%
Average
75%
84%
Gaming - Weighted Average
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 技嘉Aero 15Classic-XA(酷睿 i7-9750H, RTX 2070 Max-Q)笔记本电脑评测
Sascha Mölck, 2019-07-18 (Update: 2019-07-18)