结论——华硕 Zenbook 14 是一款性能均衡的优质产品
新款华硕 Zenbook 14 是一款价格亲民的 14 英寸日常笔记本电脑，在我们的评测中给人留下了良好的印象。它拥有高品质的机身、出色的输入设备，且电池续航时间比戴尔 XPS 13 或苹果 MacBook Neo 等竞争对手更长。 骁龙 X 处理器在日常使用场景下性能充足，大致与 XPS 13 中的 Wildcat Lake 处理器相当。苹果的 A18 Pro 处理器单核性能明显更高，但多核性能较低。
这款 OLED 面板的表现可说喜忧参半。虽然主观画质非常出色，具备 OLED 典型的优势——如深邃的黑色、丰富的色彩、快速的响应时间以及准确的色彩还原，但其刷新率仅限于 60 Hz，亮度也仅为 300 尼特，非常低。此外，它还不支持 HDR。
基础款（8/256 GB）售价799美元，高配款（16/512 GB）售价999美元，在当前市场环境下定价合理，与戴尔XPS 13持平，但如果可能的话，我们建议选择16 GB内存的机型。 不过，目前更大的问题在于去年的旧款华硕 Zenbook A14 仍可购买。 例如，在亚马逊上，你可以以870美元的价格买到搭载骁龙X1P-42-100处理器、16GB+512GB存储，并配备更亮且支持HDR的OLED屏幕的机型，其性价比更高。
Pros
Cons
价格与供货情况
配备 8 GB 内存和 256 GB SSD 存储的 SKU 零售价为 799 美元，而我们评测的这款配备 16 GB 内存和 512 GB 存储的机型零售价为 999 美元。
- $1,199.99ASUS Zenbook 14 OLED Touchscreen Laptop,14" FHD+, AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 (> Intel Ultra 9 288V), 16GB DDR5, IST Computer Customized 256GB/512GB/1TB/2TB SSD, Copilot+ PC, 1080p Webcam, Backlit, Win 11 Pro
- $839.00ASUS Zenbook 14 UX3405CA 14" FHD Touchscreen Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 16GB RAM, 512GB SSD, Intel Arc Graphics, Windows 11 Home, Thin & Light Ultrabook Notebook
- $48.881pcs Cooler Fans for ASUS 14 Zenbook 14 AI UX3480GA UX3480AA UX3480QA
规格
机箱、网络连接与输入设备
Zenbook 14 提供扎布里斯基米色、北极蓝以及科莫多珊瑚色三种配色，并采用陶瓷铝合金机身。与 Zenbook A14（重量不足 1 公斤）相比，新款 Zenbook 14 重量略重，为 1.1 公斤，但手感更为扎实。 底座的稳定性极佳，只有键盘中央部分在施加很大力道时才会凹陷，但在实际使用中这并不构成问题。机盖的坚固度稍弱，且会有一些吱吱声，但铰链的调节非常到位。 可维护部件仅限于 M.2-2280 SSD，用户还可以清洁风扇。
接口配置相当充足，包括两个 USB-C 接口、一个 USB-A 接口以及 HDMI 接口，同时配备了传输速率稳定且高速的 Wi-Fi 6E 模块。 1080p网络摄像头的成像效果不错。输入设备是本机的亮点之一，因为它配备了一款键程为1.7毫米、精准度极高的背光键盘，打字体验非常舒适。触控板的表现也极为出色，机械点击声并不刺耳。
| Networking | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| HP Omnibook 5 14 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
显示屏 - OLED，亮度300尼特
华硕采用了 OLED 面板（1920 x 1200 像素，16:10），主观画质非常出色，色彩丰富（全面覆盖 P3 色域）、黑色深邃且响应速度快，但问题在于亮度。 该面板亮度仅约300尼特，且不支持HDR。结合镜面屏的特性，这在户外使用时也会成为问题。 刷新率也仅限于 60 Hz，但考虑到其价格定位，这并不是一个致命的缺陷。XPS 13 配备了一块 120 Hz 的 IPS 面板，分辨率更高、亮度更好，但响应时间较慢；而 MacBook Neo 则采用了一块更亮的 60 Hz IPS 面板。
华硕的面板存在 480 Hz 的 PWM 闪烁现象，但振幅较低，且华硕仍提供其软件解决方案以实现无闪烁调光。出厂时的色彩准确度已非常出色，可用于图像编辑（华硕提供了精准的 P3 及 sRGB 色彩配置文件）。 由于我们的校准软件不兼容基于ARM架构的Windows系统，因此无法对该面板进行校准。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 302 cd/m²
Contrast: 30200:1 (Black: 0.01 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.1 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.69}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.6 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.94}
88.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
98.9% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
99.6% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.12
CCT: 6451 K
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA ATNA40KW01-0, OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Dell XPS 13 DX13260 LG Philips LP134WQ, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.4", 120 Hz | Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB IPS, 2408x1506, 13", 60 Hz | Ninkear S14, 16+1TB BOE0D0A, , 2240x1400, 14", 60 Hz | HP Omnibook 5 14 Samsung SDC4213, OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA ATNA40CT06-0, OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -0% | -16% | -18% | -5% | 1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 99.6 | 98.2 -1% | 72.2 -28% | 67.4 -32% | 95 -5% | 100 0% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 98.9 | 99.9 1% | 97.9 -1% | 97.3 -2% | 100 1% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 88.7 | 87.6 -1% | 72.6 -18% | 69.7 -21% | 89.6 1% | |
| Response Times | -2643% | -1048% | -1634% | 3% | 17% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 1.65 ? | 51.2 ? -3003% | 20.8 ? -1161% | 42 ? -2445% | 1.67 ? -1% | 1.08 ? 35% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 1.41 ? | 33.6 ? -2283% | 14.6 ? -935% | 13 ? -822% | 1.84 ? -30% | 1.17 ? 17% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 480 ? | 480 | 480 ? | |||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 22 | 13.5 39% | 22 -0% | |||
| Screen | -277% | -566% | -275% | -4% | 40% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 302 | 539.3 79% | 548 81% | 381 26% | 288.7 -4% | 386 28% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 304 | 503 65% | 519 71% | 362 19% | 289 -5% | 387 27% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 98 | 89 -9% | 91 -7% | 82 -16% | 98 0% | 98 0% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.01 | 0.25 -2400% | 0.48 -4700% | 0.24 -2300% | ||
| Contrast (:1) | 30200 | 2157 -93% | 1142 -96% | 1588 -95% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.1 | 1.2 43% | 1.4 33% | 1.36 35% | 3.43 -63% | 0.9 57% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6 | 3.63 39% | 3.1 48% | 2.24 63% | 7.04 -17% | 1.7 72% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.6 | 1.4 61% | 2.1 42% | 1.09 70% | 1.3 64% | 1.5 58% |
| Gamma | 2.12 104% | 2.2 100% | 2.24 98% | 2.45 90% | 2.2 100% | 2.19 100% |
| CCT | 6451 101% | 6727 97% | 6870 95% | 6494 100% | 6336 103% | 6399 102% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.92 | 0.4 | 1.2 | |||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -973% /
-577% | -543% /
-513% | -642% /
-425% | -2% /
-2% | 19% /
25% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.74 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.67 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.7 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.65 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.88 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.77 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.13 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (30.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 480 Hz Amplitude: 22 % | ≤ 100 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 480 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 480 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7625 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
测试条件
我们在测试中使用了“性能模式”。虽然 HWiNFO 目前已显示骁龙 X1 芯片的功耗数据，但这些数据尚不完整，且与我们的实际功耗测量结果并不完全吻合，因此无法提供确切数值（预计约为 35 瓦）。 对于日常使用场景，我们推荐“标准模式”，因为其性能损失较小，且即使在满载状态下，风扇噪音也明显更低。
注意：目前，512 GB 存储容量的 SKU 存在 SSD 故障，会导致功耗增加约 3 瓦。 华硕已知晓此问题，目前正在着手修复，预计很快会推出解决方案。我们将原装的三星 SSD 更换为三星 990 Pro，并使用该硬盘进行了功耗测量和电池续航测试。此外，我们还纳入了功耗较高的电池续航测试数据以供对比。
处理器性能
骁龙 X1-26-100 是高通速度最慢的骁龙 X 系列处理器，但其整体 CPU 性能对于日常任务而言绝对绰绰有余。 其测试结果大致与戴尔 XPS 13 中的 Wildcat Lake 处理器相当；而苹果 MacBook Neo 中的 A18 Pro 处理器在单核场景下速度明显更快，但在全核高负载情况下则稍显逊色。尽管 CPU 性能并非亮点，但绝对足以应对日常任务，且运行稳定。 下表显示了原生CPU基准测试结果，而CB R15循环测试下方的表格则显示了模拟CPU基准测试结果。在电池供电模式下，多核性能会下降8%。
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
| CPU Performance rating | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| HP Omnibook 5 14 | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 -2! | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (416 - 1471, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA | |
| HP Omnibook 5 14 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (646 - 708, n=4) | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (83 - 200, n=52, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omnibook 5 14 | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (96 - 96, n=4) | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB | |
| Geekbench 6.7 / Multi-Core | |
| HP Omnibook 5 14 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5987 - 20325, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (10492 - 14998, n=6) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB | |
| Geekbench 6.7 / Single-Core | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1922 - 4195, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omnibook 5 14 | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (1421 - 2675, n=6) | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB | |
Cinebench R15 多核循环测试
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance rating | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB -11! | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB | |
| HP Omnibook 5 14 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5263 - 21812, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB | |
| HP Omnibook 5 14 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (6897 - 7539, n=5) | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (975 - 2213, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB | |
| HP Omnibook 5 14 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (956 - 978, n=5) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2072 - 8541, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA | |
| HP Omnibook 5 14 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (2639 - 2881, n=5) | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (366 - 832, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB | |
| HP Omnibook 5 14 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (359 - 374, n=5) | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (849 - 3334, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omnibook 5 14 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (1338 - 1422, n=5) | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (184 - 322, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB | |
| HP Omnibook 5 14 | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (181.2 - 186, n=5) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (16455 - 77867, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB | |
| HP Omnibook 5 14 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (29240 - 30075, n=5) | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (4088 - 6699, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB | |
| HP Omnibook 5 14 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (4041 - 4127, n=5) | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| Geekbench 6.7 / Multi-Core | |
| HP Omnibook 5 14 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5987 - 20325, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (10492 - 14998, n=6) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB | |
| Geekbench 6.7 / Single-Core | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1922 - 4195, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omnibook 5 14 | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (1421 - 2675, n=6) | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (3.16 - 25.1, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA | |
| HP Omnibook 5 14 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (4.44 - 5.52, n=5) | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (67.6 - 102.3, n=5) | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| HP Omnibook 5 14 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (39.9 - 78.8, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (0.84 - 0.888, n=5) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA | |
| HP Omnibook 5 14 | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.4024 - 0.861, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
| Performance rating | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB -1! | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA -1! | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 -1! | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2069 - 32043, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (5435 - 5647, n=4) | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11041 - 120045, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (14133 - 16182, n=4) | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (561 - 5169, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (2093 - 2368, n=4) | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (44593 - 95002, n=41, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (44150 - 44593, n=3) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (692 - 18164, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (1357 - 1384, n=4) | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5978 - 64271, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (9024 - 9154, n=4) | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6815 - 96917, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (35860 - 40691, n=4) | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (127.2 - 1361, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (447 - 490, n=4) | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (953 - 17362, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (2699 - 3102, n=4) | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (10193 - 85600, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (30286 - 31591, n=4) | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU CheckMate | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (471 - 5939, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (n=1) | |
系统与存储设备
Zenbook 14 系统响应迅速，实际使用中感觉并不卡顿。我们顺利运行了常规的基准测试套件，未出现任何卡顿现象，也未发现稳定性问题。部分基准测试和应用程序在 ARM 系统上仍无法正常运行，因此建议您先确认所需应用程序是否兼容。 这款三星 PCIe 4.0 固态硬盘提供 512 GB 存储容量（可用空间 423 GB），在并非所有基准测试中表现都理想，但这可能与我们之前提到的固态硬盘故障有关。待华硕修复该问题后，我们将重新进行基准测试。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| HP Omnibook 5 14 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1061 - 2356, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB | |
| HP Omnibook 5 14 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (1093 - 1135, n=5) | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1022 - 2277, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB | |
| HP Omnibook 5 14 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (1001 - 1056, n=5) | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1070 - 2743, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB | |
| HP Omnibook 5 14 | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (1203 - 1246, n=5) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1010 - 1854, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (1007 - 1176, n=5) | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| HP Omnibook 5 14 | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB | |
| HP Omnibook 5 14 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (353 - 404, n=4) | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (203 - 530, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA | |
| HP Omnibook 5 14 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (167.3 - 378, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (104.2 - 286, n=5) | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (420 - 1158, n=5) | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (234 - 709, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA | |
| HP Omnibook 5 14 | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB | |
* ... smaller is better
» No benchmarks for this notebook found!
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (15233 - 131023, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (61578 - 63432, n=4) | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (116332 - 127192, n=4) | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (13982 - 127174, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (17404 - 135141, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (46150 - 48754, n=4) | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6.1 - 317, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (7.2 - 17.2, n=2) | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
* ... smaller is better
* ... smaller is better
磁盘限速：DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8
GPU 与游戏性能
Adreno X1-45 集成显卡（iGPU）是市面上速度最慢的现代显卡之一，其图形性能总体非常低，但仍能轻松应对包括高分辨率视频播放在内的任何日常任务。该显卡几乎无法运行游戏，我们建议使用 Xbox 云游戏等流媒体服务。
| 3DMark Performance rating - Percent | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB -3! | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB -2! | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA -1! | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA | |
| Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 -2! | |
| HP Omnibook 5 14 -2! | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4571 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3651 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1056 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 1140 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (711 - 1226, n=15) | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| HP Omnibook 5 14 | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (241 - 1117, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom METAL | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (76.3 - 227, n=5, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Performance rating - Percent | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB | |
| HP Omnibook 5 14 | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 -2! | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA -1! | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB -5! | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5.6 - 78.6, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA | |
| HP Omnibook 5 14 | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (10.9 - 61.3, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| HP Omnibook 5 14 | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (4.73 - 43.7, n=52, last 2 years) | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB | |
| HP Omnibook 5 14 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (8.37 - 54.5, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| HP Omnibook 5 14 | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (19 - 101.3, n=43, last 2 years) | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB | |
| HP Omnibook 5 14 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (29.9 - 97, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB | |
| HP Omnibook 5 14 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (16.2 - 50.5, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB | |
| Ninkear S14, 16+1TB | |
| HP Omnibook 5 14 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
《赛博朋克2077》极高画质帧率图表
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 104.2 | 95 | 33.8 | 15.1 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 87.3 | 71.7 | 59.5 | 50.7 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 37.5 | 20 | 11.9 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 39.3 | 29.9 | 25.6 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 86.9 | 30.1 | 22.2 | 19.3 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 13.4 | 10.9 | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 14.9 | 11.4 | 9.75 | 8.36 |
排放与功耗
系统噪声
ZenBook 14 通常运行时静音或非常安静。除非对 CPU 进行极限压力测试（在日常使用中很难实现），否则您完全听不到风扇的声音。 在我们的压力测试中，性能模式下的噪音值最高为 47.1 dB(A)，标准模式下为 36.2 dB(A)，静音模式下为 27.7 dB(A)。我们未听到任何其他电子噪音。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 24.6 / 24.6 / 24.6 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 26.1 / 47.4 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.6 dB(A) | ||
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA SD X1-26-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | Dell XPS 13 DX13260 Core 5 320, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 WCL | Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB A18 Pro, A18 GPU | Ninkear S14, 16+1TB R5 7535HS, Radeon 660M | HP Omnibook 5 14 SD X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA SD X1-26-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 3% | -16% | -0% | 3% | ||
| off / environment * (dB) | 24.6 | 23.3 5% | 24.9 -1% | 25.8 -5% | 24.7 -0% | |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 24.6 | 23.3 5% | 25.1 -2% | 25.8 -5% | 24.7 -0% | |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 24.6 | 23.3 5% | 25.2 -2% | 25.8 -5% | 24.7 -0% | |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 24.6 | 23.3 5% | 25.2 -2% | 25.8 -5% | 24.7 -0% | |
| Load Average * (dB) | 26.1 | 27.7 -6% | 45.3 -74% | 29 -11% | 26.4 -1% | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 32.5 | 35.6 -10% | 45.3 -39% | 29.2 10% | 28.7 12% | |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 47.4 | 40.7 14% | 45 5% | 37.8 20% | 42.7 10% | |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (dB) | 44.8 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在日常使用中，表面温度并不构成问题。在负载状态下，底座左侧会明显发热，但最高达到 42-43 °C 的温度绝非问题。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.8 °C / 91 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (-4.6 °C / -8.2 F).
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA SD X1-26-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | Dell XPS 13 DX13260 Core 5 320, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 WCL | Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB A18 Pro, A18 GPU | Ninkear S14, 16+1TB R5 7535HS, Radeon 660M | HP Omnibook 5 14 SD X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA SD X1-26-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 7% | 11% | -15% | 4% | 4% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 41.6 | 39 6% | 40.8 2% | 47 -13% | 32.4 22% | 40 4% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 43.8 | 38.2 13% | 38 13% | 41.5 5% | 33.6 23% | 42.4 3% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 27 | 26 4% | 23.8 12% | 33.9 -26% | 30.2 -12% | 25.7 5% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 27.1 | 26.2 3% | 22.8 16% | 33.9 -25% | 32 -18% | 26.5 2% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
这款立体声扬声器的音质与 XPS 13 相当，但与 MacBook Neo 相比稍逊一筹。
Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Dell XPS 13 DX13260 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Ninkear S14, 16+1TB audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
HP Omnibook 5 14 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
功耗与电池续航时间
Zenbook 14 是一款效率极高的设备，我们建议使用 65W 电源适配器（欧盟版机型出厂时不附带电源适配器）。 虽然 50 Wh 的电池容量相对较小，但其续航表现却非常出色。在 150 nits 亮度下的 Wi-Fi 测试中，续航时间超过 20 小时；在屏幕全亮度下，我们测得的续航时间也超过 11 小时。 受 SSD 故障影响，电池续航时间显著缩短，分别为 9 小时 20 分钟（150 尼特）和 6 小时 54 分钟（最大亮度）。
| Off / Standby | 0.35 / 0.51 Watt |
| Idle | 3 / 5 / 5.2 Watt |
| Load |
17.2 / 70 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA SD X1-26-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | Dell XPS 13 DX13260 Core 5 320, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 WCL | Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB A18 Pro, A18 GPU | Ninkear S14, 16+1TB R5 7535HS, Radeon 660M | HP Omnibook 5 14 SD X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA SD X1-26-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -14% | 6% | -92% | 4% | 6% | -4% | -43% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 3 | 1.9 37% | 1.5 50% | 5.3 -77% | 1.9 37% | 3.1 -3% | 2.84 ? 5% | 3.5 ? -17% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 5 | 5.4 -8% | 8.9 -78% | 9.1 -82% | 2.5 50% | 5.2 -4% | 5.23 ? -5% | 6.43 ? -29% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 5.2 | 5.8 -12% | 9 -73% | 12.5 -140% | 8.1 -56% | 5.4 -4% | 6.86 ? -32% | 7.75 ? -49% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 17.2 | 20.6 -20% | 18.9 -10% | 44.5 -159% | 17.8 -3% | 13.8 20% | 16.8 ? 2% | 39.4 ? -129% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 20.2 | 30.1 -49% | 10.3 49% | 38 -88% | 19.1 5% | 19.7 2% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 19.4 | 33.6 -73% | 11.5 41% | 40.7 -110% | 19.9 -3% | 19.6 -1% | ||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 70 | 52 26% | 26.3 62% | 61.5 12% | 70.3 -0% | 46.8 33% | 62.5 ? 11% | 63.9 ? 9% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗 赛博朋克 / 压力测试
外接显示器的功耗
Notebookcheck 评分
Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA
- 09/23/2026 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Total Sustainability Score: 潜在竞争对手对比
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 85.6%  | Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,199.99 ASUS Zenbook 14 OLED Touchsc... 2. $839.00 ASUS Zenbook 14 UX3405CA 14"... 3. $48.88 1pcs Cooler Fans for ASUS 14... List Price: 999€ | 1.1 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI OLED |
2. 85.7%  | Dell XPS 13 DX13260 Intel Core 5 320 ⎘ Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | List Price: 700 USD | 1.1 kg | 12.7 mm | 13.40" 2560x1600 225 PPI IPS |
3. 86%  | Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB Apple A18 Pro ⎘ Apple A18 GPU ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB SSD | List Price: 699€ | 1.2 kg | 12.7 mm | 13.00" 2408x1506 218 PPI IPS |
4. 82.9%  | Ninkear S14, 16+1TB AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS ⎘ AMD Radeon 660M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 629€ | 1.1 kg | 15 mm | 14.00" 2240x1400 189 PPI |
5. 85.5%  | HP Omnibook 5 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 550 USD | 1.3 kg | 12.7 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI OLED |
6. 86.3%  | Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 1299€ | 978 g | 15.9 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
