华硕(ASUS) 灵耀U 2代 (i5-8265U,SSD,FHD) 笔记本电脑评测
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (18.4 - 142, n=15, last 2 years)  | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)  | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC)  | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)  | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (22.5 - 207, n=15, last 2 years)  | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC)  | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)  | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)  | |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
	
					   
  | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 77 %
Center on Battery: 323 cd/m²
Contrast: 1605:1 (Black: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 6.35 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
calibrated: 1.88
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 8.35 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
91% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
90.9% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
63.5% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.51
CCT: 8227 K
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T IPS, 1920x1080, 14"  | Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA IPS, 1920x1080, 14"  | Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 IPS, 1920x1080, 14"  | Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F IPS, 1920x1080, 14"  | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 0%  | 6%  | -31%  | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 63.5  | 64.3  1%  | 66.2  4%  | 43.19  -32%  | 
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 90.9  | 89.7  -1%  | 98.3  8%  | 64  -30%  | 
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 64.6  | 65.1  1%  | 67.8  5%  | 44.62  -31%  | 
| Response Times | 10%  | -3%  | -15%  | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 42 ?  | 39.6 ?  6%  | 41 ?  2%  | 41 ?  2%  | 
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 28 ?  | 24 ?  14%  | 30 ?  -7%  | 37 ?  -32%  | 
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 25000 ?  | 200 ?  | ||
| Screen | -11%  | 6%  | -20%  | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 321  | 332.8  4%  | 291  -9%  | 291  -9%  | 
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 282  | 310  10%  | 276  -2%  | 276  -2%  | 
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 77  | 87  13%  | 90  17%  | 85  10%  | 
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.2  | 0.29  -45%  | 0.27  -35%  | 0.46  -130%  | 
| Contrast (:1) | 1605  | 1148  -28%  | 1078  -33%  | 633  -61%  | 
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.35  | 5.14  19%  | 3.86  39%  | 4.3  32%  | 
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 12.2  | 11.88  3%  | 8.26  32%  | 10.01  18%  | 
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.88  | 3.61  -92%  | 3.18  -69%  | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 8.35  | 8.8  -5%  | 5.33  36%  | 4.21  50%  | 
| Gamma | 2.51 88%  | 2.33 94%  | 2.25 98%  | 2.46 89%  | 
| CCT | 8227 79%  | 8227 79%  | 7426 88%  | 6867 95%  | 
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) (%) | 59  | 58.1  -2%  | 62  5%  | 41  -31%  | 
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) (%) | 91  | 89.2  -2%  | 98  8%  | 64  -30%  | 
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -0% / 
						-7%  | 3% / 
						5%  | -22% / 
						-22%  | 
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8156 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.  | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16 ms rise | |
| ↘ 12 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 70 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms).  | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21 ms rise | |
| ↘ 21 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 66 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms).  | ||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 322, n=71, last 2 years)  | |
| Tuxedo InfinityBook Pro 14 (Windows 10)  | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8265U (111 - 164, n=35)  | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T | |
| Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=73, last 2 years)  | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T (BIOS 204)  | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8265U (457 - 750, n=38)  | |
| Tuxedo InfinityBook Pro 14 (Windows 10)  | |
| Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 | |
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2299 - 10697, n=12, last 2 years)  | |
| Tuxedo InfinityBook Pro 14 (Windows 10)  | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8265U (5841 - 6209, n=9)  | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (14395 - 56242, n=12, last 2 years)  | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8265U (16318 - 22962, n=9)  | |
| Tuxedo InfinityBook Pro 14 (Windows 10)  | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 | |
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (n=1last 2 years)  | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8265U (12198 - 14499, n=6)  | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T | |
| Tuxedo InfinityBook Pro 14 (Windows 10)  | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (n=1last 2 years)  | |
| Tuxedo InfinityBook Pro 14 (Windows 10)  | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8265U (3470 - 3842, n=6)  | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8265U (13168 - 14390, n=3)  | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8265U (4229 - 4605, n=3)  | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (27854 - 43897, n=7, last 2 years)  | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T | |
| Tuxedo InfinityBook Pro 14 (Windows 10)  | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8265U (7144 - 16249, n=19)  | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6041 - 8929, n=7, last 2 years)  | |
| Tuxedo InfinityBook Pro 14 (Windows 10)  | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8265U (2106 - 4830, n=19)  | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (215 - 476, n=2, last 2 years)  | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA (Edge 42.17134.1.0)  | |
| Tuxedo InfinityBook Pro 14 (Chromium 71.0.3578.98 - Windows 10)  | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8265U (193.7 - 244, n=19)  | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T (Edge 44)  | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 (Edge 42)  | |
| PCMark 7 Score | 5946 points | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3733 points | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4690 points | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4715 points | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3643 points | |
Help  | ||
| PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Tuxedo InfinityBook Pro 14 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2747 - 4244, n=24)  | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1739 - 1828, n=2, last 2 years)  | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G  | Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G  | Tuxedo InfinityBook Pro 14 Samsung SSD 970 EVO 500GB  | Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ  | Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027  | Average WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 12%  | 37%  | -20%  | -45%  | 4%  | 122%  | |
| Write 4K (MB/s) | 99.9  | 123  23%  | 130.9  31%  | 96.8  -3%  | 60.5  -39%  | 118.5 ?  19%  | 146.9 ?  47%  | 
| Read 4K (MB/s) | 40.03  | 43.28  8%  | 44.66  12%  | 36.99  -8%  | 21.63  -46%  | 42 ?  5%  | 63.5 ?  59%  | 
| Write Seq (MB/s) | 973  | 753  -23%  | 1187  22%  | 463.1  -52%  | 450.9  -54%  | 1123 ?  15%  | 2465 ?  153%  | 
| Read Seq (MB/s) | 1111  | 1336  20%  | 1190  7%  | 794  -29%  | 482.3  -57%  | 1208 ?  9%  | 3060 ?  175%  | 
| Write 4K Q32T1 (MB/s) | 424.6  | 510  20%  | 317.4  -25%  | 291.7  -31%  | 248.9  -41%  | 324 ?  -24%  | 422 ?  -1%  | 
| Read 4K Q32T1 (MB/s) | 255.9  | 339.2  33%  | 386.1  51%  | 352  38%  | 267.6  5%  | 322 ?  26%  | 485 ?  90%  | 
| Write Seq Q32T1 (MB/s) | 1300  | 1455  12%  | 2510  93%  | 468.1  -64%  | 534  -59%  | 1091 ?  -16%  | 4313 ?  232%  | 
| Read Seq Q32T1 (MB/s) | 1723  | 1727  0%  | 3560  107%  | 1489  -14%  | 563  -67%  | 1729 ?  0%  | 5534 ?  221%  | 
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 11338 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2074 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 9534 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1168 points | |
Help  | ||
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (995 - 16296, n=67, last 2 years)  | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA | |
| Tuxedo InfinityBook Pro 14 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T | |
| Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (1144 - 3432, n=244)  | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (832 - 11887, n=70, last 2 years)  | |
| Tuxedo InfinityBook Pro 14 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T | |
| Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (557 - 2608, n=213)  | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5577 - 61591, n=29, last 2 years)  | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA | |
| Tuxedo InfinityBook Pro 14 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T | |
| Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (6205 - 16400, n=225)  | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (804 - 4501, n=69, last 2 years)  | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (299 - 797, n=88)  | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 67.4 | 36.7 | 31 | 9.9 | 
Noise level
| Idle | 
 |  30.5 / 30.5 / 30.9 dB(A)  | 
| Load | 
 | 32.7 / 31.5 dB(A) | 
![]()  | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud  | 
||
min:   | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 39.3 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.4 °C / 86.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (-2.2 °C / -3.9 F).
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids  400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs  2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall  100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1%  difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (64.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids  400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs  2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall  100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.4%  difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids  400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs  2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall  100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.2%  difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | |
| Idle | |
| Load | 
 | 
Key: 
							min:   | |
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (7.25 - 26.4, n=71, last 2 years)  | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T | |
| Tuxedo InfinityBook Pro 14 | |
Pros
Cons
华硕灵耀U 2代UX433FA-A6061T是一款纤薄,时尚,小巧的14英寸笔记本电脑。它的金属外壳做工很好,其Whiskey-Lake Core i5处理器应该为大多数程序和用途提供足够的性能。A6061T也非常安静,因此在噪音敏感的环境中使用它时应该没有什么问题。
“华硕灵耀U 2代UX433FA-A6061T是一款精心设计且功能强大的14英寸笔记本电脑,但是它的低亮度显示屏和BIOS都让人失望。“
NVMe SSD也很不错,因为它可确保系统流畅地运行。如果存储空间不足,您可以随时更换SSD,但必须对设备进行拆卸才能执行此操作。键盘也很不错,而其隐藏的数字键盘很有趣,可能对于某些人来说非常实用。
UX433FA-A6061T也具有良好的电池寿命,但奇怪的是它比其功能更强大的同型号更短,尽管电池尺寸相同。此外,IPS显示屏具有稳定的视角和良好的对比度,但我们认为亮度还是太低。我们不喜欢华硕选择了亮面屏的决定,因为它具有高反光性,但这是大多数现代笔记本电脑都有的问题。
奇怪的是,USB Type-C端口无法为设备充电,也不支持DisplayPort输出。我们本来希望华硕能够为UX433FA配备一个雷电3端口,因为我们已经看到许多制造商开始给他们7000-8000元价位的笔记本电脑配备雷电3。因为这将允许人们外接GPU,这仍然是一个利基市场。
总的来说,UX433FA-A6061T是一款体面的14英寸笔记本电脑,它有很多功能,但它的价格仅略微低高配版于UX433FA-A6076T。 A6061T不能像我们预期的那样比i7版更好地保持其性能,这是令人失望的。但这并不妨碍UX433FA-A6061T取得优异的总体成绩。
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
 - 02/08/2019  v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck






































